請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10628
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江炯聰 | |
dc.contributor.author | Po-Hung Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林勃宏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:45:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-16 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:45:03Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 李芳齡譯 (2007),企業觸媒策略-觸媒型企業多邊平台的制勝法則,天下文化。 2. 李波,王傳譯 (2009),贏在關鍵字廣告,人民郵電出版社。 3. 應建中 (2006),搜尋引擎網站之經營策略研究-以Google為例,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 4. 陳正君 (2006),網路商業模式與平台策略,國立臺灣大學管理學院商學組碩士論文。 5. 陳品均 (2006),Web 2.0 應用服務策略行動之研究- 以Yahoo!、Google、MSN 為例,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 6. 江旻峻 (2007),Web 2.0時代網路發展策略- 從整合性關係建立網站之觀點出發, 國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 7. 黃俊傑 (2008),網路廣告產業分析與領導廠商之競合策略,國立臺灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 8. 歐家宇 (2008),行動網路軟體平台競爭策略分析,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 9. 方羽倫 (2009),位置基礎服務與廣告在使用GPS功能智慧型手機時的希望與問題,國立台灣大學管理學院GMBA碩士論文。 10. 杜佾凝(2009),線上廣告服務商之競合 ---以Google、Microsoft、Yahoo!為例,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 11. 張奇、施仲仙、湯少華 (2009),前瞻五大行動創新應用,財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所(MIC)專案報告。 12. 行動寬頻下之適地性(LBS)服務發展趨勢-全球新興行動寬頻技術發展分析 (2009),財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所(MIC)專案報告。 英文部分 1. A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, (2010), Business Model Generation, Self published. 2. Evans, D. S. & Schmalensee, R. (2007), Catalyst Code: the strategies behind the World’s most dynamic companies, Harvard Business School Press. 3. Evans, D. S. (2008), “The Economics of the Online Advertising Industry”, Review of Network Economics, Vol. 7:3, pp 359-391, 2008. 4. Federman A. D. (2009) Promise and Issues for Location-based Services and Advertising via GPS-enabled smart phones, National Taiwan University GMBA Master Thesis. 5. Hagel, J., & Armstrong, A. G. (1997). Net gain: expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 6. James P. Andrew and Harold L. Sirkin, (2006), Payback-Reapting the Rewards of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press 7. Jiun-Jie Huang (2008), “Online Advertising Industry Analysis and Co-optition Strategy of the Leading Firm”, Master Thesis of National Taiwan University. 8. Juin-Der Lee, (2010) 'An Innovative Business Model for Online Calendars: An Automatic Informatin Retrieval (AIR)-Based Approach', (unpublished manuscript). 9. Mark W. Johnson,(2009), Seizing the White Space, Harvard Business Press 10. M. Dubosson-Torbay,A. Osterwalder, ,Y Pigneur., (2001), “eBusiness Model Design, Classification and Measurements”, Thunderbird International Business Review 11. Michael Rappa, (2000). Business models on the Web: managing the digital enterprise. North Carolina State University, USA. 12. Paul Timmers (1998), “Business Models for Electronic Markets, European Commission”, Directorate-General III. 13. Petrovic, O., Kittl, C., Teksten, R.D. (2001),”Developing business models for ebusiness”, International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2001, Vienna. 14. Rappa, M. (2002). “Managing the digital enterprise – Business models on the web.” Source: http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html 15. Rochet, J. and J. Tirole (2003) “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets,” Journal of the European Economic Association, pp.990-1029. 16. Rochet, J. & Tirole, J,(2004), “Two-Sided Markets: An Overview”, Mimeo, IDEI University of Toulouse. 17. Stephen E. Arnold, (2000). “The Joy of Six: Internet Content Revenue Models”, Arnold Information Technology. 18. Tseng-Chun Chen, (2006), “Online Business Model and Network Platform Strategy”, Master thesis of National Taiwan University. 網站部分 1. Apple website, http://www.apple.com 2. comScore website, http://www.comscore.com 3. Facebook website, http://www.facebook.com 4. Google website, http://www.google.com 5. Interactive Advertising Bureau website, http://www.iab.com 6. Microsoft website, http://www.microsoft.com 7. Nokia website, http://www.nokia.com 8. RIM website, http://www.rim.com 9. Yahoo! website, http://www.yahoo.com 10. Twitter website, http://twitter.com | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10628 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去很長的一段時間,Google成為網路界的霸主,主要原因有二:搜尋引擎技術的領先以及成功地結合網路廣告的商業模式,而且Google與其他競爭者(Microsoft, Yahoo)的差距可以說是越來越遠,似乎整個網路世界已為Google所統治。然而近幾年間,從Web 2.0概念的崛起一路到社群交友網站(Myspace, Facebook)與微網誌(Twitter)的興起,網路世界的版圖正在悄悄地變化移動著。此外,手機與網路從兩個不相同的平台與產業,開始互相靠近而形成一個新的行動網路產業(Mobile Internet Industry),更多的競爭者分別從各自原本的戰場跨足到對方的領域來。因此Google從前網路霸主的地位以及網路廣告的商業模式開始被來自不同產業,不同網路服務型態及不同商業模式的競爭者所挑戰。
本研究主要基於上述的網路時代背景,從分析過去Google成功的競爭策略與關鍵因素,到探討現階段來自不同產業的競爭者的競爭策略分析與比較,在第五章分成了搜尋引擎的戰爭、社群網站的戰爭、行動網路的戰爭、作業系統的戰爭以及未來位置基礎服務(Location-Based Service)的戰爭來進行不同競爭者間的分析與討論。本研究發現策略聯盟與締結策略夥伴為這些不同競爭者間共同的戰術運用,同時企業併購的活動也成為了各個競爭者主要的策略戰術。最後,本研究也嘗試預測未來可能的搜尋引擎發展以及未來競爭版圖的可能態勢。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | On the internet search and advertising market, nowadays Microsoft Bing and Facebook already become the largest competitors to Google. According to comScore report, Microsoft’s Bing got off to a good start by gaining about 3% market share in June, 2009. The latest search engine rankings for January 2010 showed continued growth by Microsoft's Bing at the expense of both Yahoo! and Google's search service.
According to Web measurement firm Compete Inc., Facebook has passed search-engine giant Google to become the top source for traffic to major portals like Yahoo! and MSN, and is among the leaders for other types of sites. This trend is shifting the way Web site operators approach online marketing, even as Google takes steps to move into the social-media world. Google nowadays is trying hard to expand its landscape from internet to Mobile, and even try to enter the Operating system, Netbook market and the consumer electronics such as E-Book, TV, etc. This study analyzes different battles among different industries between Google and all its competitors from their business model, revenue model, competitive advantage, strategy and other factors. Undoubtedly, Google is facing a big challenge from different competitors on different battles. In the end, this study summarizes the trend of strategic groups and strategic alliance among these keen competitions plus how to apply M&A strategy to compete on the violent environment. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:45:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97749011-1.pdf: 5952470 bytes, checksum: 799633ab47cade1d0c8e369fb99f18b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
謝 辭 I 中文摘要 II Abstract III Table of Contents IV List of Figures VII List of Tables XI Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Motives 1 1.2 Research Objectives 2 1.3 Research Methods 3 1.4 Thesis structure 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 Business Model 5 2.1.1 Four-box Business Model 6 2.1.2 Five patterns of Business Model 7 2.2 Profit formula on internet 8 2.2.1 Hagel, J. and Armstrong, A. G. (1997) 8 2.2.2 Stephen E. Arnold (2000) 8 2.2.3 Michael Rappa (2002) 10 2.3 Network Platform Strategy 14 2.3.1 Network Effect 14 2.3.2 Platform Strategy 15 Chapter 3 Competitive Landscape on Search Engine 19 3.1 Search Engine History and Introduction 19 3.1.1 History of Search Engine 19 3.1.2 Introduction of Search Engine Technology 22 3.2 Key Players and their Strategies 24 3.2.1 Yahoo! 26 3.2.2 Microsoft 29 3.2.3 Google 31 3.3 Competitive Analysis on Search Engine Industry 34 Chapter 4 Competitive Landscape on Internet Advertising Industry 37 4.1 Formats of Internet Advertising 37 4.2 Value Chain in Internet Advertising Industry 42 4.3 Key Players and their strategies 45 4.3.1 Google 45 4.3.2 Competitors 54 4.3.2.1 Yahoo! 54 4.3.2.2 Microsoft 57 4.3.3 DoubleClick 59 4.4 Competitive Analysis on Internet Advertising Industry 62 Chapter 5 Competitive Landscape: Key Players Strategies on new era (after 2008) 66 5.1 Battle on Internet Advertising 67 5.1.1 Microsoft 68 5.1.2 Yahoo! 75 5.1.3 Google’s response 78 5.1.4 Analysis and discussion 79 5.2 Battle on Social Network Platform 81 5.2.1 Facebook 82 5.2.2 Twitter 91 5.2.3 Google’s response 100 5.2.4 Analysis and Discussion 102 5.3 Battle on Mobile Phone Platform 105 5.3.1 RIM 107 5.3.2 Apple 110 5.3.3 Nokia 112 5.3.4 Microsoft 116 5.3.5 Google 117 5.3.6 Analysis and Discussion 119 5.4 Battle on Operation System Platform 124 5.4.1 Microsoft 125 5.4.2 Google Android and Chrome 129 5.4.3 Analysis and Discussion 132 5.5 Next Battle on Location Based Service Platform 135 5.6 Summary 143 Chapter 6 Conclusions 144 6.1 Research Conclusions 144 6.2 Further Research Suggestions 148 6.2.1 The trend of future search engine and competition 148 6.2.2 Future research suggestion 149 References 152 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | Google廣告商業模式的競爭策略分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Competitive Strategy Analysis on Google Advertising Business Model | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柴惠珍,尤瑞崇,羅茂雄 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 商業模式,搜尋引擎,網路廣告,Google, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Business Model,Search Engine,Internet Advertising,Google, | en |
dc.relation.page | 156 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 5.81 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。