請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10572
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陸 雲(Alan Yun Lu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Pei-Yu Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李佩育 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:40:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:40:21Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部份
1.王良原,2009。「台灣中小型乳品業者乳品利基市場之研究」。碩士論文,東海大學食品科學研究所食品工業管理組。 2.朱慧敏,2004。「不確定性對臺灣農產品產地交易模式選擇之影響:兼論台灣卜蜂企業肉雞契約飼養模式之變動」。碩士論文,國立中山大學經濟研究所。 3.李宗儒、黃炳文、黃慧玲,2004。「台灣牛乳供應鏈與發展策略之研究」,『中華農產運銷協會』。第130期,頁26-39。 4.林晉寛、陳奇修,2007。「交易成本理論是解釋組織統治決策的有效理論嗎?-台灣之實證研究觀察」。『中華管理評論國際學報』,第10卷第3期。 5.施宗雄,2005。「牛乳及其加工產品之發展」,『中華民國乳業協會五十週年紀念特刊』。91-94。 6.洪堯勳,1999。「從交易成本觀點探討價值鏈管理創新」。博士論文,國立交通大學經營管理研究所。 7.洪順慶,2006。「台灣品牌競爭力」,『天下雜誌股份有限公司』。41-42。 8.流通快訊,第611、640、641、642期流通快訊雜誌社。 9.徐仁輝,1995。「組織經濟學的緣起與發展」。『中國行政評論』,6月,第4卷第3期,頁105-126。 10.高嬿嵋,2007。「台灣鮮乳產業的空間結構與形塑過程」。碩士論文,高雄師範大學地理學系。 11.許應哲、王俊賢、盧永祥、胡安慶,2009。「我國農民參與契約產銷之探討」,『中華農產運銷協會』。第140期,頁42-53。 12.郭添保,1993。「降低乳品進口關稅對台灣牛乳產業影響之分析」。碩士論文,國立中興大學農產運銷學系。 13.陳正倉、陳忠榮、林惠玲、莊春發,2007。『產業經濟學』。台北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。 14.陳幸浩,2005。「台灣乳業五十年」,『中華民國乳業協會五十週年紀念特刊』。14-16。 15.陸雲,2005。「營造農業企業化經營與價值鍊管理環境之研究--稻米與畜牧產業」,行政院農業委員會九十四年度科技研究計畫研究報告,頁33。 16.陸雲,2007。「提升台灣稻米競爭力作法之制度面分析-契作關係與配套措施」,『農業與資源經濟』,4(2),頁1-24。 17.陸雲,2009。「整合性水果外銷組織之建構」,『農業與經濟』。第43期,頁58-80。 18.黃炳文,2006。「台灣牛乳產業剩餘乳及其調節措施之研究」,『中華農學會報』。7(2),頁162-175。 19.黃炳文、施孟隆,2006。「台灣牛乳供應鏈發展情勢與策略之研究」,『中華農學會報』。7(3),頁277-295。 20.黃炳文、施孟隆,2007。「台灣牛乳供應鏈發展之關鍵因素研究」,『中華農學會報』。8(3),頁194-209。 21.楊德才,2007。『新制度經濟學』。南京:南京大學。 22.溫琇雯,2005。「以組織經濟學分析農業供應鏈之建立」。碩士論文,國立台灣大學農業經濟研究所。 23.萬鍾汶,1998。「全面性廣告與品牌廣告對台灣鮮乳需求與市場競爭性影響之研究」,國立中興大學農業經濟研究所。 24.趙 琪、林正士,2002。「廣告管理決策前因之研究:整合代理理論與交易成本觀點」。『管理學報』,10月,第19卷第5期,頁927-948。 25.劉祥熹,1991。「台灣地區乳品工業之產業組織分析」。『台灣銀行季刊』,第42卷第3期,頁274-297。 26.蔡精強,1985。台灣酪農經營之經濟分析。台灣省政府農林廳。 27.鄭秋桂,2001。「台灣毛豬產銷合作社向前整合經濟誘因之研究」。博士論文,國立中興大學農業經濟研究所。 28.戴基峰,2002。「交易特性對供應鏈協調機制與交易績效之影響-以資源基礎觀點與交易成本理論探討」。博士論文,國立中央大學資訊管理學系。 二、英文部份 1.Akerlof,G.A.,1970,”The Marker of Lemon:Quality Uncertainity and the Market Mechanism”,Quarterly Journal of Economics.84:488-500. 2.Alchain,Armen,1961.Some Economics of Property.RAND D-2316,Santa Monica,Calif.:RAND Corporation. 3.Alchian, Armen, and H. Demsetz,1972.”Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,”American Economic Review.72:777-795. 4.Alchian,Armen,1965.”The basis of some recent advances in the theory of management of the firm,”American Economics.22:433-449 5.Bergen,Mark,Shantanu Dutta,and Orville C.Walker,Jr.,1992.”Agency Relationships in Marketing:A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories,”Journal of Marketing.56:1-24. 6.Coase ,R.H.,1988.”The Firm,the Market,and the Law,”Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press. 7.Coase,R.H.,1937,'The Nature of the Firm,'Economica.4:386-405. 8.Coase,R.H.,1960.”The Problem of Social Cost,”Journal of Law and Economics.3:1-44. 9.Coase,R.H.,1984.”The New Institutional Economics,”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics.Vol.140:.229-231. 10.Demsetz,H.,1967.”Toward a theory of property rights,”American Economics Review.12:1-22. 11.Demsetz,H.,1969.”Information and efficiency:Another viewpoint,”Journal of Law and Economics.21:297-326. 12.Furubotn, and Pejovich,1972.”Property Rights and Economic Theory:A Survey of Recent Literature,”Journal of Economic Literature.10:1137-1162. 13.Furubotn, and Pejovich,1974.The Economics of Property Rights. Cambridge,Mass.:Ballinger. 14.Furubotn, E. G. and R. Richter,2006.Institutions and Economic Theory:The Contribution of the New Institution Economics. 顏愛靜主釋,黃名義等合譯。台北市:五南出版社。 15.Hurwicz,Leonid,1972.”On information decentralized systems,”Decision and Organization. Amsterdam : North-Holland Publishing Company 297-336 16.Jensen,Michael, and William, Meckling,1976.”Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavion,Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,”Journal of Financial Economics.3:305-360. 17.John D.Lawrence and Marvin L.Hayenga.,2002.”The U.S.Pork and Beef Sectors:Divergent Organization Patterns,Paradoxes and Conflicts,”In Paradoxes in Food Chains and Networks,J.H.Trienekens and S.W.F.Omta,editors.512-521. 18.Klein,B.,R.G.Crawford, & A.A.Alchian,1978.”Vertical integration,Appropriable Rents and Competitive Contracting Process,”Journal of Law and Economics.21:297-326. 19.Knoeber,Charles R.,1989.”A Real Game of Chicken:Contracts,Tournaments,and the Production of Broilers,”Journal of Law,Economics,and Organization.5:271-292. 20.Koopmans,T.,1957.Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York:McGraw-Hill. 21.Martinez,Steve W.,2002.”Vertical Coordination of Marketing Systems:Lessons From the Poultry,Egg,and Pork Industries,”USDA Agricultural Economic Report.807. 22.Reimer,Jeffrey,2006.”Vertical Integration in the Pork Industry,”AJAE.88:234-248. 23.Ross,Stephen,1973.”The economic theory of agency:The principal’s problem.”American Economic Review.63:134-139. 24.Simon, Herbert A.,1957.Models of Man. New York:John Wiley & Sons. 25.Whinston,A.B & Stabl,D.O & Choi,S Y.,1997,”The Economics of Electronic Commerce”,Don Fowley Press,139-173,375-404. 26.Williamson,Oliver E.,1975.”Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and antitrust implicateon,”NY.:Free Press. 27.Williamson,Oliver E.,1979.”Transaction-cost economics:The governance of contractuall relations,”Journal of Law and Economics.22:233-61. 28.Williamson,Oliver E.,1985.”The Ecomonic Institutions of Capitalism:Firms,Markets,Relational Contracting,”NY.:Free Press. 29.Williamson,Oliver E.,1988.”The Logic of Economic Organization,”Journal of Law,Economics,and Organization.4:65-93. 30.Williamson,Oliver E.,1991.”Comparative Economic Organization:The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,”Administrative Science Quarterly.36:269-96. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10572 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 酪農、乳廠與通路商三者為乳業供應鏈之個別廠商;酪農為生產端,乳廠為製造端、通路商為銷售端,彼此為取得對方資源而存在環環相扣的交易關係,尤其以乳廠為乳業整體發展之關鍵。本文試圖以組織經濟學相關理論做為研究方法,藉由交易成本理論分析生乳與乳品之交易特性,探討衍生的交易成本對交易雙方治理結構的影響。並利用代理理論及財產權理論,分析契約內容的誘因調整及其他相關因素對交易關係穩定性的影響。
分析結果顯示,乳廠與酪農的契約交易,考量交易成本及生產成本因素,是當前最佳的交易關係,且政府的輔導政策是促進廠農交易關係穩定性最為重要的因素。而乳廠與通路商的交易關係,受制於交易雙方的資產專屬性相差較大,通路商成為交易關係中強勢的一方;所以,乳廠需要整合通路商以避免投入的資產面臨套牢的風險,並降低現貨交易模式的交易成本。然所有權的整合非國內一般中小型乳廠規模所及,透過契約的整合是目前普遍使用的交易模式,因此契約內容的制定顯得重要,合宜的契約內容使交易關係更具穩定,而穩定的交易關係亦能提升乳廠的經營績效。 本研究之台農乳廠個案,為屬中小型乳廠規模,自1969年建廠以來,與上游的酪農戶之治理結構一直採行契約產銷,交易關係相當穩定;與下游的通路商之治理結構,則有現貨交易、契約交易、組織內部交易等3種交易關係,其中以97%的契約交易為主要。然因組織特性、人性、環境等因素影響,使得契約內容的執行力相對薄弱,契約的誘因調整績效亦顯得不彰,因此值得藉由組織經濟學理論探討問題所在,供台農乳廠經營者之參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Dairy farmers, processors, and distributors are the three kinds of firms in the supply chain in Taiwan’s dairy industry. There are interlocking vertical coordination problems among these three kinds of firms, dairy farmers on the production side, processors on the manufacturing side, and distributors on the sales side. Each obtains its resources from the other and the processors play the key role in the development of dairy industry. This thesis intends to use organizational economics theory to analyze the vertical coordination problems among these three kinds of firms. In particular, this thesis applies transaction cost economics to analyze the trading characteristics of raw milk and dairy products and the effects of transaction costs on the choice of governance structure between firms, and uses agency theory and property rights theory to analyze the effect of economic incentives on the stability of transactional relations among these three kinds of firms.
The empirical results of this thesis show that the current contractual relationship is the most appropriate form of vertical coordination between dairy farmers and processors, when both transaction costs and production factors are considered. Moreover, Government's guidance policy is the most important factor in promoting the stability of this contractual relation. On the vertical coordination between dairy processors and distributors, dairy distributors become the stronger side considering asset specificity involved in this transactional relationship. Therefore, dairy processors need to integrate their distributors to avoid transactional risks and reduce transaction costs in spot market. However, integration of their distributors is impossible for Taiwan’s small and medium sized processors. Thus presently contractual transaction is still the commonly used mode of transaction in Taiwan. For this reason, contracts and their specification of economic incentives are important. Appropriate contracts make transaction relations stable which will in turn help enhance the performance of dairy processors. A small to medium scale dairy processor, Taiwanese Farmers Dairy Processor (TFDP), is also studied in this thesis. Since its establishment in 1969, TFDP maintains a contractual relationship with its upper dairy farmers and this governance structure has been quite stable in both its production and marketing operation. In the vertical coordination with its lower distributors, TFDP adopts governance structures such as spot trading, contractual transaction, and hierarchical trading within its own organization. Contractual transaction accounts for 97 percent of TFDP sale and is the dominant form of its transaction with distributors. However, under the adverse influence of some organizational characteristics, human and environmental factors the execution of contract is rather inefficient. It seems that the economic Incentives of the contract were not effective in improving contract efficiency. Therefore, it deserves to investigate further the problems that TFDP faces nowadays with organizational economics theory so that constructive solutions could be proposed to the operators of TFDP. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:40:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-P96627009-1.pdf: 3083542 bytes, checksum: 996299ca6b1b0583c914bd138d0dd856 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論..................... 1
第一節 研究背景................... 1 第二節 研究動機與目的................ 2 第三節 研究方法與研究流程及章節次序....... 4 第四節 資料來源與研究限制............ 5 第二章 組織經濟學理論與文獻回顧........... 9 第一節 組織經濟學理論.............. 9 第二節 文獻回顧................. 22 第三章 乳廠與酪農之交易關係............. 27 第一節 乳業介紹................. 27 第二節 影響生乳交易模式選擇的因素........ 41 第三節 生乳交易模式............... 45 第四節 影響契約交易穩定的因素.......... 49 第五節 問卷結果分析............... 53 第四章 乳廠與通路商之交易關係............ 59 第一節 乳品市場介紹............... 59 第二節 影響乳品交易模式選擇的因素........ 68 第三節 乳品交易模式............... 71 第四節 影響乳品交易穩定的因素............ 75 第五節 問卷結果分析................. 77 第五章 個案研究-台農乳廠............... 83 第一節 乳廠介紹................. 83 第二節 乳廠與上游酪農之交易關係......... 86 第三節 乳廠與下游通路商之交易關係........ 89 第四節 影響契約穩定性的因素........... 97 第五節 經營績效問題............... 103 第六章 結論與建議.................. 109 第一節 結論................... 109 第二節 建議..................... 112 參考文獻....................... 115 附錄一:乳廠與酪農之交易關係問卷........... 121 附錄一:台農乳廠與通路商之交易關係問卷........ 129 附錄一:台農乳廠與臺灣省農會組織內部關係問卷..... 137 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 乳品廠與其上下游業者間垂直協調關係之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on the Vertical Coordination of Taiwan's Dairy Industry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李朝賢,何京勝 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 乳廠,交易關係,交易成本,交易特性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | dairy processor,vertical coordination,transaction costs,transaction characteristics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 141 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 3.01 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。