請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10452完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曹幸之 | |
| dc.contributor.author | YU-CHU HUNG | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪瑜筑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:30:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-20 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:30:39Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
大村政男、王瑤英譯. 2007. 三天讀懂心理學-解讀人心的關鍵要訣. p193-202. 大是文化.台北. 王秋華. 2006. 國小實施有機園藝活動歷程之行動研究. 國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文. 王淑貞. 2007. 阿公阿嬤の田—安養機構中老人參與園藝活動歷程及其對老人健康狀況、人際關係和自我概念之影響. 亞洲大學少會工作學系碩士論文. 王瀅筑、陳炳堯、朱僑麗. 2009. 園藝活動對養護機構住民身心功能之影響 . 長期照護雜誌. 13: 325-337. 台北少年觀護所. 2008. <www.tpj.moj.gov.tw/mp088.huml > 白尊仁. 2009. 國小特教班從事園藝植栽之行動研究. 國立臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系所碩士論文. 朱凱薇. 2007. 一顆種子,一個希望 園藝治療活動在黎明教養院之個案研究. 國立慈濟大學社會工作研究所碩士論文. 何秀珠. 1986. 園藝治療-簡介一種「美」的輔導方法. 國教世紀. 21: 6-9. 吳思涵. 2005. 園藝活動對療養院慢性精神病患之影響. 園藝治療在職能治療中的應用. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 李執中 2006. 犯罪心理學. 華杏. 台北. (原著Curt R. Bartol and Anne M. Bartol, Criminal behavior: a psychosocial approach) 林木泉. 2008. 園藝治療入門. 洪葉文化. 台北(原著Charles A. Lewis) 林秀珍. 2007. 經驗與教育探微-2杜威(J. Dewey)教育哲學之詮釋. 師大書苑. 台北 法務部. 2008. 97年少年兒童犯罪概況及其分析. 法務部. 台北 洪甄苡. 2008. 園藝治療活動對自閉症患者治療效果之個案研究. 國立中興大學園藝學系研究所碩士論文. 台中. 洪蘭.2003. 真實的快樂. 遠流. 台北. (原著Martin E. P. Seligman ) 徐振邦、粱文蓁、吳曉青和陳儒晰. 2006. 最新教育研究法. 韋伯文化. 台北. (原著Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion and Keith Marrison.) 郝冰、王西敏. 2009. 失去山林的孩子.野人文化股份有限公司.台北 (Richard Louv 原著, Last child in the woods- saving our children from nature deflect disorder ) 高淑珍. 2006. 台北市啟智學校高職部中重度智能障礙學生園藝課程發展之行動研究. 國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文. 張元毓、蘇瑋佳、張俊彥. 2010. 學生從事園藝操作之表現與其提升注意力及獲得成就感多少之關係. 臺灣園藝. 56: 57-65. 張建隆. 2006. 園藝活動提昇慢性精神病患認知功能. 國立台灣大學園藝學所碩士論文. 張春興. 2001. 現代心理學. 東華書局. 台北 張敏. 2008. 園藝活動對特殊幼兒學習成效之行動研究. 國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作所碩士論文. 梁仲容. 1996. 園藝治療輔導方案對國小兒童自我概念、生活適應及休閒態度影響之研究. 初等教育學報. 民86.06: 333-373. 梁仲容. 2002. 園藝治療在兒童輔導上的應用. 諮商與輔導. 196: 2-7. 許家綾. 2006.青少年藝術治療. 心理. 台北(原著Bruce, L. M. , The dynamics of art as therapy with adolescents) 許瑞文. 2004. 國小二年級生命教育課程設計之行動研究-「向日葵的種植」與「毛毛蟲的飼養活動為例」. 國立嘉義大學教育研究所博士論文.郭毓仁、李靖雯、李子芬. 2002. 唐氏症患者在園藝訓練上之表現. 中國園藝. 46: 443-449. 郭毓仁、李靖雯、李子芬. 2002. 唐氏症患者在園藝訓練上的表現. 中國園藝. 46: 443-449. 郭慧綺. 2005. 園藝活動認知與情緒體驗之研究. 屏東科技大學農村規劃系碩士論文. 陳金定. 2007. 青少年發展與適應問題-理論與實務. 心理出版社.台北. 陳彥睿、陳榮五. 2008. 上班族女性參與麥桿菊花藝裝式活動之效益研究. 臺中區農業改良場研究匯報 101: 11-20. 陳柏璋. 1988. 教育研究方法的新取向: 質的研究方法. 南宏. 台北 陳國濱. 2006. 園藝活動對高職智能障礙學生自我概念及休閒效益之影響. 朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文. 陳惠美. 2009. 園藝活動對人與環境之效益. 自然生態環境與健康效益國際研討會論文集. 中華民國人與植物學會. p50-65. 陳惠美、許正典. 2007. 園藝治療對憂鬱症婦女介入之初探-個案研究. 造園景觀學報. 13: 27-50. 陳惠美、黃雅鈴. 2005. 園藝治療之理論與應用. 中國園藝. 51: 135-144. 陳筱筠. 2008. 園藝治療應用於老人身心健康改善之研究-以屏東縣潮州鎮孝愛仁愛之家為例. 國立屏東科技大學景觀暨遊憩管理研究所碩士論文. 陳慧娟. 2006. 景觀與園藝療癒介入大學生壓力. 中國文化大學景觀學研究所碩士論文. 曾兆良. 2003. 台北啟智學校園藝課程對智能障礙身心差異之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 曾慈惠. 2001. 園藝治療活動與其場所介紹. 造園季刊. 41: 47-52. 曾慈惠、毛慧芬、凌德麟. 2004. 園藝治療在職能治療中的應用. 科學農業. 52:198-211. 曾慈慧、呂文賢、何超然、林國青. 2007. 園藝治療活動對護理之家失能長者治療效果之研究. 臺灣園藝. 53: 345-360. 黃淑君. 2003. 自然景觀意像對少年犯心理之影響. 中華心理衛生學刊. 16: 1-22. 黃德祥、薛秀宜、謝龍卿、洪佩圓、黃惠鈴、朱麗勳、巫宜倫、謝幸穎、許會慈. 2006. 青少年心理學: 青少年的發展、多樣性、脈絡與應用. 心理. 台北(原著 Richard M. Lerner , Adolescence: development, diversity, context, and application) 賈馥茗、楊深坑. 1988. 教育研究法的探討與應用. 師大書苑. 台北 劉玉玲. 2005. 青少年發展-危機與轉機. 揚智文化. 台北 劉富文. 1999。人與植物的關係。科學農業,2-10 蔡清田. 2000. 教育行動研究. 五南. 台北 鄭智勇. 2008. 生命的更新-園藝治療對受戒人的影響. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 謝爵祥. 2009. 十步之內必有芳草─師生進行校園周遭野花草木移栽及相關園藝活動歷程之行動研究. 國立臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系所碩士論文. 西文文獻 American Horticultural Therapy Association. 2007. Horticultural therapy. 20.10.2007 <http://www.ahta.org>. Appleton, B. L., J. B. Clardy and S. K. Sutphin. 2008. The green thumb nursery: growing trees, changing kids. 10.25.10.2009. <http://www.files.vaes.vt.edu/HRAREC/Green%20Thumb%20Nursery.pdf> Arashida, E., S. Tsukagoshi, K. Noda, T. Kita, T. Ohgama,M. Komiyama and F.Ikegami. 2007. Psychological and physiological verification of the therapeutic effects of horticultural activity mainly with herbs. Horticulturral Ressearch(Japan)6: 491-496. Armstrong, T. A. 2002. The effect of environment on the behavior of youth offenders, A randomized experiment. Journal of Criminal Justice 30: 19-28. Bringslimark, T., T. Hartig and G. G. Patil. 2009. The psychological benefits of indoor plants: a critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 422-433. Brown, A., S. Brown, P. Darwin and S. Hockborn. 2005. The role of gardening in everyday life. 22.07.2009. <http://www.liv.ac.uk/geography/undergraduate/fieldclases/santacruz/SCRS2005/2005PDFs/Ashlley_al.pdf.> Cammack, C., T. M. Waliczek and J. M. Zajicek. 2002a. The green brigade: the educational effects of a community-based horticultural program on the horticultural knowledge and environmental attitude of juvenile offenders. HortTechnology. 12: 77-81. Cammack, C., T. M. Waliczek and J. M. Zajicek. 2002b. The green brigade: the educational effects of a community-based horticultural program on the self-development characteristics of juvenile offenders. HortTechnology. 12: 82-87. Dorothy, B. 2009. The child in the garden: an evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. The Journal of Environmental Education. 40: 15-38. Elings, M. 2006. People-plant interation- the physiological, psychological and sociological effects of plants on people. In Hassink, J. and Van, D.M.. (eds.) Farming for Health. The Netherlands: Wageningen University and Research Centre. Finch, C. R. 1995. Green brigade: horticultural learn-and-earn program for juvenile offenders. HortTechnology. 5: 118-120. Flagler, J. 1993. Correctional youth and the green industry. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture 7: 49-55. Flagler, J. 1995. The role of horticulture in training correctional youth. HortTecnology. 5: 185-187. Frumkin, H. 2001. Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 20: 234-240. Gibson, R. B. and M. P. Hughes. 2000. Treatment of the sexually violent predator: a horticultural approach. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 11: 20-25. Hale, B., G. Marlowe, R.H. Mattson, J.D. Nicholson, and C.A. Dempsey. 2005. A Horticultural therapy probation program: community supervised offenders. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 16: 38-49. Haller, L. R. and C. L. Kramer. 2006. Horticultural therapy methods: making connections in health care, human service, and community programs. USA: the Haworth Press. Han, K. T. 2006. An empirical approach to feng shui in terms of psychological well-being. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 17: 8-19. Heim, S., J. Stang and M. Ireland. 2009. A garden pilot project enhances fruit and vegetable sonsumption among children. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 109: 1220-1226. Jiller, J. 2006. Doing time in the garden- life lessons through prison horticulture. New Village Press. California. Johnson, W. T. 1999. Horticultural therapy: a bibliographic essay for today’s health care practitioner. Alternative Health Practitioner. 5: 225-232. Kim, E. and R. H. Mattson. 2002. Stress recovery effects of viewing red-flowering geraniums. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 13: 4-12. Klemmer, C. D., T. M. Waliczek and J. M. Zajicek. 2005. Growing minds: the effect of a school gardening program on the science achievement of elementary students. HortTechnology. 15: 448-452. Koch, S., T. M. Waliczek and J. M. Zajicek. 2006. The effect of a summer garden program on the nutritional knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of children. HortTechonology. 16: 620- 625. Lee, S. M. and J. K. Suh. 2008. Horticultural therapy in a jail: correctional care for anger. Acta Hortcultuae. 790: 109-113. Leger, L. S., 2003. Health and nature-new challenges for health promotion. Health Promotion International. 18: 173-175. Lewis, C. L. 1996. Green nature/human nature: the meaning of plants in our lives. University of Illionis. Lewis, J. F. and R. H. Mattson. 1988. Garden may reduce blood pressure of elderly people: activity suggestions and model for intervention. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 3: 25-28. Lindemuth, A. L. 2007. Designing therapeutic environments for inmates and prison staff in the Unitedd States: Precedents and contemporary applications. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology. 8: 87-97. Maller, C., M. Townsend., A. Pryor, P. Brown and L. S. Leger. 2005. Healthy nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International. 21: 45-54 Matsuo, E. 2008. Humanity in horticulture-healing and pleasure. Acta Horticulturae. 790: 39-44. Mattson, R. H., J. Merkle, L. Parrett and T. Waliczek. 1993. Proposed horticultural therapy standards of practice. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 7: 41-48. McCormick, F. G., D. E. Cox, and G. M. Millers. 1989. Experiential needs of students in agriculture programs. The Agricultural Education Magazine. 62: 10-11. McGuinn, C. P. 1999. An Assessment of a vocational horticulture training curriculum at a school for juvenile offenders. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Master of Science in Horticulture. Moffitt, T. E. 1993. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review. 100: 674-701. Moore, E. O. 1981. A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands. Journal of Environmental System. 11: 17-23. Morgan, S. C., S. L. Hamilton, M. L. Bentley and S. Myrie. 2009. Environmental education in botanic garden: exploring Brooklyn Botanic Garden’s project green reach. The Journal of Environmental Education. 40: 35-52. Nurse, J., P. Woodcock and J. Ormsby. 2003. Influence of environmental factors on mental health within prisons: focus group study. BMJ. 327: 480. Park, S. H. and R. H. Mattson. 2009. Therapeutic influence of plants in hospital rooms on surgical recovery. HortScience. 44: 102-105. Pfeffer, J. C., D. E. Deyton and J. M. Fly. 2009. Survey of horticultural therapy programs in Tennessee. Journal of Therapeutic Hortuculture. 19: 25-35. Phibbs, E. J. and D. Relf. 2005. Improving research on youth gardening. HortTechnology. 15: 425-428. Pierce, C. A. and L. M. Seals. 2006. The importance of community gardening for homeless women: a pilot study. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 17: 20-25 Pigg, A. E., T. M. Waliczek and J. M. Zajicek. 2006. Effects of a gardening program on the academic progress of third, fourth, and fifth grade math and science student. HortTechnology. 16: 262-264. Pliszka, S. R., J.O. Sherman, M. V.Barrow and S. Irick. 2000. Affective disorder in juvenile offenders: A preliminary study. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 157: 130-132. Rappe, E. and S. L. Kivelä. 2005. Effects of garden visits on long-term care residents as related to depression. HortTechnology 15: 298-303. Relf, P. D. 1973. Horticulture: a thrapeutic tool. Journal of Rehabilitation. 39: 27-29. Relf, P. D. 1999. The role of horticulture in human well-being and qualityof life. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 5: 5-14. Relf, P. D. 2005. The therapeutic values of plants. Pediatric Rehabilitation. 8: 235-237. Rice, J. S. and L. L. Remy. 1998. Impact of horticultural therapy on psychosocial functioning among urban jail inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 26: 169-191. Richard, H. J. and D. M. Kafami. 1999. Impact of horticultural therapy on vulnerability and resistance to substance abuse among incarcerated offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 29: 183-193. Robison, C. W. and J. M. Zajicek. 2005. Growing minds: the effect of a one-yearschool garden program on six constructs of life skills of elementary school.children. HortTechnology. 15: 453-457. Russell, J. A. 1980. A Circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 6: 1161-1178. Sandel, M. H. 2004. Therapeutic gardening in a long-term detention setting. Journal for Juvenile Justice Services 19: 123-131. Sandler, L., J. A. Vandegrift and C. VerBrugghen. 1995. From desert to garden: reconnecting disconnected youth. Educational Leadership. 52: 14-16. Sempik, J., J. Aldridge and S. Becker. 2003. Social and therapeutic horticulture: evidence and messages from research. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. Shoemaker, C. A. 2004. Horticultural therapy: comparisons with other allied therapies and current status of the profession. Acta Horticulturae 639: 173-178. Shoemaker, C. A., P.D. Relf, and V.I. Lohr. 2000. Social science methodologies for studying individuals' responses in human issues in horticulture research. HortTechnology: 10: 87-93. Simson, S. and M. Straus. 1998. Horticulture as therapy: principles and practice. The Haworth: Binghamton, NY. Sugimoto, M., H. Cho, and R. H. Mattson. 2005. Bio-monitoring human heart rate and caloric expenditure responses to horticultural therapy. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 16: 20-27. Terri, M. Y. 1990. A comparison of the effects of horticultural therapy and pet therapy on self-esteem and well-being of adults with visual disabilities. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 5: 47-58. Toyoda, M. 2008. Development of horticultural therapy evalution system using three elements. Acta Horticulturae. 790: 55-61. Trexler, C. J. and S. Barrett. 1992. The race toward academics through agriscience. The Agricultural Education Magazine. 64: 6-8. Uehara, I. and S. Itoh. 1999. Importance of multiple outdoor activities for persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 10: 22-27. Wagenfeld, A. 2009. It’s more than seeing green: exploring the senses through gardening. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 19: 47-53. Waliczek, T. M., J. C. Bradley and J. M. Zajicek. 2001. The effect of school gardens on children’s interpersonal relationships and attitudes toward school. HortTechnology. 11: 466-467. Waliczek, T. M., J. M. Zajicek and R. D. Lineberger. 2005. The influence of gardening activities on consumer perceptions of life satisfaction. HortScience. 40: 1360-1365. Yost, B., and L.Chawla. 2009. Benefits of gardening for children, Fact Sheet #3, Aug 2009. Children, Youth and Environments Center for Resarch and Design. 18.08. 2009.<http://www.peecworks.org/PEEC/PEEC_Research/S03D4BA56-03D4BBCF> | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10452 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 少年時期(12歲以上、未滿18歲)正處身心發展尚未成熟階段,一般採取感化教育矯正少年偏差行為。觸法少年在管束期間,身處與外界隔離、活動空間被管控的地方,其身心必有一定的壓力。園藝治療係源於人有親近自然的本能和與植物有極密切之關係。本研究將以植物作為媒介的園藝治療導入少年觀護所的教育課程,透過行動研究方式,探討如何在少年觀護所實施多元化治療性園藝活動,了解觀護少年的體驗及學習狀況與效益分析,探究園藝活動類型與方案設計的適宜性,作為觀護所日後設計與實施園藝活動的參考。研究採用個案心得感想單、問卷和觀察記錄,進行質性和量化評估分析。以每隔週固定時間及場地進行1.5小時園藝活動。活動包括「園藝技術」和「園藝資材應用」兩種類型;每次活動獨立設計,以短期目標為主,最終成果呈現以不超過兩次上課時間為原則。研究結果顯示,有別於其它教室課程,園藝活動課程因能實際動手操作,能改善觀護少年排斥學習或感到無聊的狀況,少年能在活動中暫時忘卻身陷囹圄,心情獲得抒解。園藝活動可以提供少年多種正向情緒體驗,在成功的體驗中,獲得成就感、建立自信心。少年在知識和園藝技能上有所增進、發揮創造力、關心周遭、培養耐心與細心、促發思考、提供未來休閒娛樂或職業上的選擇等,並懂得團隊合作及和他人友善連結。課程內容配合節令和節慶進行,使活動豐富又具變化,提供不同個案需求,並能同時兼顧新舊個案,能降低少年流動率高的影響。活動內容包含講課和操作兩部分,能增加少年學習的廣度和深度。講課時運用有趣名稱、多媒體和問答方式有效吸引少年,操作時以分解步驟及示範帶領、2~4人分組的方式,能提高少年參與度與減少孤立狀況。觀護少年樂於學習,並表示因可以自己動手做、感覺有玩、有趣而喜愛園藝活動並且可投入其中。整體而言,治療性園藝活動方案適宜在觀護所設計實施,可以提供觀護少年生理、心理、教育、社交等方面效益,增加少年被收容期間的正面情緒及行為。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As adolescence (12~18 years of age) is in the stage not fully developed both physically and mentally, probation education is usually adopted to reclaim the juvenile delinquent. Under detention, the juvenile offenders being isolated in a controlled place are subjected to physical and mental stresses. Horticultural therapy is a supervised activity using plants and plant materials, to improve people’s well-being based on our nature-loving and intimate relationship with plants. Whether horticultural therapy program can be incorporated into the probation education curriculum at a juvenile detention house and whether the juvenile delinquents can be benefited to these programs and to what extent? How much these juveniles accept the courses and learn something or what kind of horticultural programs they would prefer? This study is conducted through an action research model to provide these answers and to serve as a reference for future improvement and implementation of horticultural programs in a juvenile correction center. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses are given to collected data from questionnaire, observations and clients’ report. The horticultural activity programs including “basic horticultural technology” and “utilization of gardening materials” are conducted bi-weekly for one and half hour period of time. Each session is designed to be complete in itself or the most after two classes so that the work can be shown within the session. The results show that horticultural activity, different from other classroom programs, offers hand-on experience and helps to stimulate learning. The activity can relieve the juvenile offenders and let forget the status of being under detention temporarily. They would obtain a variety of positive emotional experiences as they get achievements and build self-esteem in successful activity. From the horticultural programs, the juvenile participants obtain plant knowledge and gardening skills, developing creativity and environmental awareness. In a team project they can practice the patience, friendliness, cooperation and carefulness. The program also inspires the clients to actively think of their future career choices and leisure activities. The seasonal project linked to a festival enriches the program with variety and fun, meeting different individuals’ needs and serving flexibility to any client with indefinite length of stay in the program. Each session comprises lecture lesson and hand-on activities to strengthen the students’ learning. Various stimulating techniques are employed for the lecture part to enhance the students’ involvement like giving the session an interesting name, using multimedia and Q & A form. Assigning 2 to 4 clients in an activity group can increase their participation and reduce isolation. The juvenile offenders generally find the horticultural activities fun and interesting. The therapeutic horticultural program in a detention house can provide the juvenile offenders physical, psychological, educational and social benefits, leading them to positive emotion and behavior. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:30:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96628119-1.pdf: 1576720 bytes, checksum: 6844fd3583c01a20f8af092ac65319cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝..........................................I
中文摘要.....................................II 英文摘要 ...................................III 目錄..........................................V 圖目錄......................................VII 表目錄.....................................VIII 第一章 諸論...................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機......................1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題..................3 第三節 研究假定 ............................4 第四節 研究限制............................4 第二章 文獻探討...............................5 第一節 園藝治療定義、特色、類型............5 第二節 國內園藝治療之相關研究.............15 第三節 監禁環境的園藝效益.................20 園藝治療應用於犯罪少年.............21 少年犯罪成因及處遇簡介............ 25 第四節 行動研究...........................33 第三章 研究方法..............................36 第一節 研究架構 ...........................36 第二節 研究流程 ...........................37 第三節 研究情境...........................38 第四節 園藝活動課程設計...................40 第五節 資料蒐集的方式.....................43 第六節 資料處理與分析.....................44 第四章 研究結果與討論........................47 第一節 個案心得感想編碼...................47 第二節 問卷...............................61 第三節 園藝活動實施歷程與紀實.............68 第四節 綜合討論...........................95 第五章 結論與建議...........................101 第一節 結論..............................101 第二節 建議..............................106 參考文獻 ...................................130 附錄一 園藝活動問卷.........................141 附錄二 第二期園藝活動方案設計...............142 附錄三 建議園藝活動實施時間表...............166 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 治療性園藝活動應用於觀護少年之行動研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Action Research of Therapeutic Horticultural Activities at a Detention House for Juvenile Offenders | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 劉淑瓊 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林木泉 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 園藝治療,園藝活動,方案設計,教育效益,心理效益, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | horticultural therapy,horticultural activity,program design,educational effects,psychological effects, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 166 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf | 1.54 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
