請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10419
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳明德 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-ting Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃鈺婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:28:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:28:03Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王惠華(民93)。政府採購法對於我國大學圖書館圖書資料採購之影響。未出版之碩士論文。國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所:台中市。
吳文慧(民92)。館際合作和文獻提供:資訊時代的定位和展望,圖書與資訊學刊,47期,36-41。 吳明德(1991)。館藏發展。漢美:台北市。 吳明德(2006)。大學圖書館館藏發展的再省思。圖書與資訊學刊,59,1-15。 吳紹群、吳明德(2007)。開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播系統之影響。圖書資訊學研究,2(1),21-54。 林呈潢(民94)。大專校院圖書館。在民國九十三年圖書館年鑑(頁143-183)。台北市:國家圖書館。 林呈潢(民95)。大專校院圖書館。在民國九十四年圖書館年鑑(頁131-154)。台北市:國家圖書館。 林基源(1999)。決策與人生:現代化決策的應用。遠流:臺北市。 洪秀雄(民84)。大學圖書館的組織結構:由中央大學組織重整的經驗說起。國立中央大學圖書館通訊,14(2)。 張玉華(1997)。期刊採訪決策分析之研究-以體育學院西文期刊為例。未出版之 碩士論文,輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北縣新莊市。 梁定澎(2006)。決策支援系統與企業智慧。智勝文化:台北市。 許士軍(1999)。管理學。東華:臺北市。 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。五南:台北市。 凱普納(Kepner, C. H.)、崔果(Tregoe, B.B.)著(2004.)。新版問題分析與決策 : 經理人KT式理性思考法(The new rational manager an updated edition for a new world,伍學經、顔斯華譯)。中國生產力中心:台北縣。(原作1981出版) 游孟儒(2004)。大學圖書館電子期刊採購問題探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 黃宗忠(1995)。圖書館管理學。天肯文化:台北市。 黃鴻珠(民96)。大專校院圖書館。在民國九十五年圖書館年鑑(頁63-82)。台北市:國家圖書館。 詹麗萍(2003)。圖書館數位化館藏的建置內容、經驗架構及使用研究,興大人文學報(下冊),33,1079-1080。 詹麗萍(2005)。電子資源與圖書館館藏發展。麥田:台北市。 趙慶芬(2006)。電子期刊的資訊組織與取用之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,台北市。 劉玟怡(2002)。電子期刊對大學圖書館組織結構及分工之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所,台中市。 潘淑惠(2004)。學術圖書館電子期刊採購模式探討。圖書資訊學刊,48, 57-70。 蔡敦浩(1986)。策略性決策過程之研究。管理評論,67-80。 蔡敦浩(民74)。策略性決策過程之研究。未出版之博士論文。國立政治大學:台北市。 盧荷生(1994)。圖書館管理。台北市:漢美。 Albanese, A. R. (2001). Moving from books to bytes, Library Journal, 126(14), 52-54. Case, M. (2005). A snapshot in time: ARL libraries and electronic journal resources. Journal of Library Administration, 42(2), 87-105. Casserly, M. (2002). Developing a concept of collection for the digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(4), 577-587. Cervone, F. (2008). Managing digital libraries: the view from 30,000 feet thinking outside the library box considerations in contextualizing digital repositories for the local environment. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(3), 148-152. Chambers, M., & So, S. (2004). Full-text aggregator database vendors and journal publishers: a study of a complex relationship. Serials Review, 30(3), 183-193. Curtis, D. (2005). E-journals: A how-to-do-it manual for building, managing, and supporting electronic journal collections. Neal-Schuman Publishers. Daft, L. (2001). Organization theory and design. South-Western College Publishing : Ohio. Daft, L. (2007).Understanding the theory and design of organizations. United States : Thomson South-Western. Dahlin, T. (1991). Operations research and organizational decision-making in academic libraries. Collection Management, 14(3/4), 49-60. Davis, T. (1997). The evolution of selection activities for electronic resources. Library Trends, 45(3), 391-403. Dollar, D. M., Gallagher, J., Glover, J., Marone, R. K., & Crooker, C. (2007). Realizing what’s essential: a case study on integrating electronic journal management into a print-centric technical services department. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95(2), 147-155. Dorner, D. (2004). The impact of digital information resources on the roles of collection managers in research libraries. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 28(3), 249-274. Dugan, R. (2002). Selection and presentation of commercially available electronic resources/ strategies for building digitized collections (Book). Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(3), 171-173. Duranceau, E. (1998). Beyond print: revisioning serials acquisitions for the digital age. Serials Librarian, 33(1/2), 83-106. Easton, C. (1998). E-journals and the middleperson. Serials Review, 24(1), 97-106. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=2&hid=101&sid=800dd6ce-3023-4678-99bd-47c175457602%40sessionmgr2 Evans, G. E. (2005). Developing library and information center collections. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Flanagan, J. C. (July, 1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358. Gerhard, K. (2005). Pricing models for electronic journals and other electronic academic materials: the state of the Art. Journal of Library Administration, 42(3/4), 1-26. Glitz, B., Hamasu, C., & Sandstrom, H. (2001). The focus group: a tool for programme planning, assessment and decision-making--an American view. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 18(1), 30-37. Hazen, D. (2000). Twilight of the gods? bibliographers in the electronic age. Library Trends, 48(4), 821-841. Higa, M., Bunnett, B., & Maina, B. (2005). Redesigning a library's organization structure. College and Research Libraries, 66(1), 41-58. Jaguszewski, J.M., & Probst, L.K.(2000). The impact of electronic resources on serial cancellations and remote storage decisions in academic research libraries. Library Trends,48(4), 799-820. Jasper, R., & Sheble, L. (2005). Evolutionary approach to managing e-resources. The Serials Librarian, 47(4), 55-70. Jewell, T. (2001). Selection and presentation of commercially available electronic resources: issues and practices. Digital Library Federation Council on Library and Information Resources: Washington, D.C.. Johnson, P. (2004). Fundamentals of collection development & management. Chicago: American Library Association. Ketcham-Van Orsdel, L., & Born, K. (1999). Serials publishing in flux. Library Journal, 124(7), 48-53. Kovacs, B. (1990). The Decision-making process for library collections: case studies in four types of libraries. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Kulp, C., & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2005). Organizational approaches to electronic resource acquisition: decision-making models in libraries. Collection Management, 30(4), 3-29. Kyrillidou, M. and Young, M. (2008). ARL Statistics 2005-06: compilation of statistics from the one hundred and twenty-three members of the Association of Research Libraries. Retrived May 1, 2008, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlstats06.pdf Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of 'muddling through', Public Administration Review, 19(2), p. 79-88. Lyles, M. A., & Mitroff, I. I. (1980). Organizational problem formulation: an empirical study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 102-119. Lynden, F. (1999). Budgeting for collection development in the electronic environment. Journal of Library Administration, 28(4), 37-56. McCabe, M. (2001). The impact of publisher mergers on journal prices: theory and evidence. Serials Librarian, 40(1/2), 157-166。 McClure, C. (1980). Information for academic library decision making: The case for organizational information management. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. McClure, C. (1982). Academic librarians, information sources, & shared decision making. Ann Arbor, Mich :University Microfilms Inernational McGinnis, S., & Kemp, J. (1998). The electronic resources group: using the cross-functional team approach to the challenge of acquiring electronic resources. Library Acquisitions: Practice and theory, 22(3), 295-301. Metz, P. (2000). Principles of selection for electronic resources. Library Trends, 48(4), 711-728. Miller, R. (2000). Electronic resources and academic libraries, 1980-2000: a historical perspective. Library Trends, 48(4), 645-671. Mintzberg, H. (1977). The new science of management decision, revised edition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(2), 342-351. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. & Theoret, A.(1976). The structure of 'Unstructured' decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246-275. Montgomery, C. H. (2000a). Measuring the impact of an electronic journal collection on library costs: a framework and preliminary observations. D-Lib Magazine, 6(10). Montgomery, C. H. (2000b). ‘Fast track’ transition to an electronic journal collection: a case study. New Library World, 101(159), 294-302. Montgomery, C. H. (2003). The evolving electronic journal collection at Drexel University. Science & Technology Libraries, 24(1/2), 173-186. Montgomery, C. H. and Sparks, J. L. (2000). The transition to an electronic journal collection: managing the organizational changes. Serials Review, 26, 4-18. Orsdel, L., & Born, K. (2002). Doing the digital flip. Library Journal, 127(7), 51-56. Osburn, C. (2006). Collection management in the library quarterly, 1931-2005. Library Quarterly, 76(1), 36-57. Osburn, C. B. (1979). Academic research and library resources: changing patterns in America. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Patton, M. Q. (1995)。質的評鑑與研究。(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。桂冠:台北。 Phillips, L., & Williams, S. (2004). Collection development embraces the digital age: a review of the literature, 1997-2003. Library Resources and Technical Services, 48(4), 273-299. Prabha, C. (2007). Shifting from print to electronic journals in ARL university libraries. Serials Review, 33(1), 4-13. Quinn, B. (2008). The psychology of group decision making in collection development. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 32(1), 10-18. Ramirez, D., & Gyeszly, S. (2001). NetLibrary: a new direction in collection development. Collection Building, 20(4), 154-164. Robbins, S. P., & Decenzo, D. A.(2001). Fundamentals of management, Prentice-Hall. Roberts, M., Kidd, T., & Irvine, L. (2004). The impact of the current e-journal marketplace on university library budget structures: some Glasgow experiences. Library Review, 53(9), 429-434. Robnett, B. (1998). Online journal pricing. Serials Librarian, 33(1/2), 55. Sewell, R. G.(2001). Library materials budget survey 2000/2001. Retrived December 23, 2007, from http://www.arl.org/scomm/lmbs/lmbs2001.html Shelton, C. (2003). Best practices in cooperative collection development: A report prepared for the center for Research Libraries Working Group on best practices in Cooperative Collection Development. Collection Management, 28(3), 122-191. Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Free Press. Smith, A. (2001). Strategies for building digitized collections. Digital Library Federation Council on Library and Information Resources: Washington, D.C.. Sohn, J. (1987). Collection development organizational patterns in ARL libraries. Library Resources and Technical Services, 31(2), 123-134. Sowden, P. (2004). University library spending on books, journals and electronic resources: 2004 update” A report for the Council of Academic and Professional Publishers”. Retrieved December 29, 2007, from http://www.publishers.org.uk/paweb/PAweb.nsf/0/26448bb44c80256c52003ddf5/SFILE/Univcrsiry%20Library%20Spcndingo/0202004v2.pdf Stockdale, R., & Standing, C. (2002). A framework for the selection of electronic marketplaces: a content analysis approach. Internet Research, 12(3), 221-235. Stoffle, C., Fore, J., & Allen, B. (1999). Developing new models for collection development. Journal of Library Administration, 28(4), 3-15. Stoller, M. (2006). A decade of ARL collection development: a look at the data. Collection Building, 25(2), 45-51. Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: an overview and analysis of recent research studies. Council on Library and Information Resources. Thornton, G. (2000). Impact of electronic resources on collection development, the roles of librarians, and library consortia. Library Trends, 48(4), 842-856. Tonkery, D. (2001). Seven common myths about acquiring and accessing E-journals. In Managing Electronic Serials: Essays Based on the ALCTS Electronic Serials Institutes 1997–1999 by Pamela M. Bluh (Chicago: ALA) http://archive.ala.org/editions/samplers/sampler_pdfs/bluh.pdf Ungson, G., Braunstein, D., & Hall, P. (1981). Managerial information processing: a research review. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 116-134. Walther, J. H. (2003). Academic library administration: a case examination of faculty-librarian perceptions of journal cancellations and the decision-making process in a large, urban Institution [electronic version]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. Available from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED482381. Wang, J., & Schroeder Jr., A. (2005). The subscription agent as E-journal intermediary. Serials Review, 31(1), 20-27. Watson, P. (2003). Acquisition of E-journals. Library Technology Reports, 39(2), 28-44. Webb, J. (2001). Collections and Systems: A new organizational paradigm for collection development. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 25(1), 461–468. Weigand, S. (2002). Incorporating electronic products into the acquisition workflow in a small college library. Library Collection, Acquisition, & Technical Services., 26, 363-366. Wilhite, M. (1999). Acquisition of electronic access to information: more money, more records, more time. Acquisitions Librarian, 11(21), 37-49. Williams, M. (2004)。研究方法的第一本書。(王盈智譯)。台北市:韋伯。(原作2003年出版) Yin, R. K. (2001)。個案研究法。(尚榮安譯)。台北市:弘智。(原作1994年出版) Zhang, X. & Haslam, M. (2005). Movement toward a predominantly electronic journal collection. Library Hi Tech., 23(1), 82-89. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10419 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 由於電子資源取用便利,普遍受到讀者喜好,大學圖書館投入越來越多的經費用以建置電子資源館藏。然而,目前圖書館普遍面臨電子資源出版數量成長快速,訂費以及服務費飛漲等問題。另外,電子資源採訪大都需要透過談判及議價,同時也牽涉合約及授權等法律問題,其採訪作業遠較紙本的採訪更為複雜。圖書館在採訪電子資源的過程中必然要做出許多決策,而在決策過程中也會有不同位的人員參與,不同階段的決策活動也可能受到不同因素的影響。
本研究以組織管理的角度,瞭解大學圖書館採訪電子資源過程中的各項決策活動、參與決策人員之間互動關係以及評選資源時所考量的各項因素。採用半結構式訪談大綱為資料蒐集工具,以國內大學為抽樣母體,採取立意抽樣法,最終訪談國內12所大學圖書館,14位負責電子資源採訪業務之主管或館員,探討國內大學圖書館採訪電子資源所歷經之決策活動,影響決策過程的要素,以及參與人員所扮演的角色,及其在決策時使用之資訊。 研究結果顯示,國內大學圖書館電子資源採訪整體決策過程屬組織決策型態,而其中各項決策活動偏向為漸進式決策模式,主要在於館員認為電子資源採訪本質不變,但經費限縮的衝擊下,必須透過電子資源館藏評估,開始進行資源之刪訂與續訂之決策活動,以修正改進過去決策結果。再以決策人數來說,國內中、小型圖書館偏向於個人決策方式而大型圖書館部門分工較細,採訪工作需倚賴跨部門合作,偏向於群體決策運作模式。此外,國內大學圖書館進行電子書採訪時,偏向是圖書館館長介入決定購買,決策型態屬於由上而下的決策關係,與電子資料庫及電子期刊決策型態不同。參與決策之相關部門以及人員方面,參與決策之相關部門多寡不一,在小型圖書館中,電子資源採訪決策活動集中在單一組別。大型圖書館則決策活動牽涉部門較多,相對需要建立完善溝通機制,作為決策資訊交流管道。在國內大學圖書館電子資源採訪決策過程中,主要決策參與人員包括館員同時為決策啟動者與決策資訊傳遞者,教師為電子資源專業館藏決策者以及館長為決策結果之審核者與支持者。影響圖書館採訪電子資源決策要素包括:館員首先針對電子資源之客觀條件進行評估,如內容、價格、授權等。同時,參與決策館員相當倚賴過去在圖書館實務工作經驗。另外,在採訪電子資源過程中,館員較少主動傳遞分享決策資訊給系上教師,產生團隊決策中資訊不對稱情況。 本研究有以下建議:第一,強化電子資源聯盟資訊分析功能,以提升附加服務價值;第二,落實電子資源館藏評鑑工作,發展多元電子資源館藏評估指標;第三,加強館員資訊分享活動,建立與教師溝通互動管道;第四,教師為專業館藏之決策協助者,非最終決策者;第五,圖書館內部作業程序整合,建立跨組協商機制。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Library patrons prefer to use electronic resources because those resources can be accessed conveniently. It is obvious that electronic resource expenditures of university libraries are increasing. However, libraries are facing the challenges of rapid increment of electronic resource titles and continuing growth of subscription fees. To acquire electronic resources, libraries usually need to negotiate with venders or publishers, which make acquisition works much more complicate than those of printed materials. Libraries need to make appropriate decisions in each stage of acquisition process. Staffs from different departments may involve in decision-making process. Meanwhile, each decision-making may be influenced by different factors.
This study focuses on decision-making process rather than on decision-making skill. Fourteen acquisition librarians from 12 university libraries were interviewed. It is intended to investigate how librarians make decision in the process of acquisition of electronic resources. Factors which influence the decision-making are analyzed. The study also explores the roles of librarians involved and information they need in making decisions. Findings of this study are as follows: The acquisition of electronic recourses process is the “organizational decision-making” type. Librarians tend to revise their decisions based on results of former decisions, that is incremental model. Two decision making styles are found: group style and individual style. Medium or small-sized libraries usually adopt the individual style. On the contrary, because cooperation and negotiation among different departments are needed, all large-sized libraries adopt group style. Most of the time, librarians make their decisions independently, which they play the roles as informational integrators and distributors. Meanwhile, teachers are the major decision makers for specific subject electronic resources. Generally speaking, university library directors are the supervisors who approve and support decisions made by subordinate librarians. Factors which affect decision-making are: selection criteria of electronic resources, experience of decision-maker, and information behavior of decision maker. According to the findings of this study, it is suggested that library consortia should provide more analytic information concerning acquisition of electronic resources. Libraries should evaluate their electronic collections and develop evaluation indicators. Librarians should put much attention to share information with peers and teachers. Teachers are good collaborators in assisting decision-making, but they are not key decision makers. Libraries may need to integrate the decision-making tasks and establish appropriate workflows. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:28:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R94126012-1.pdf: 1016060 bytes, checksum: 7f514b5a195954210293cf17be58fe91 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
目錄 i 表目錄 iii 摘要 v Abstract vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題陳述 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第四節 名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 大學圖書館電子資源館藏發展 7 第二節 電子資源與圖書館採訪業務 12 第三節 圖書館館藏管理與組織變革 20 第四節 決策相關理論與圖書館 25 第三章 研究設計與實施 31 第一節 研究方法 31 第二節 研究實施 33 第三節 研究架構 36 第四節 資料分析與處理 39 第四章 研究調查結果分析 41 第一節 圖書館基本資料分析 41 第二節 受訪者基本資料分析 49 第三節 圖書館電子資源館藏發展現況 53 第四節 圖書館電子資源採訪作業歷程 67 第五節 參與電子資源採訪決策人員 85 第六節 採訪電子資源之評估因素 97 第五章 結論與建議 121 第一節 結論 121 第二節 建議 126 第三節 後續研究建議 128 參考文獻 129 附錄一 139 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 我國大學圖書館電子資源採訪決策之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Decision-Making Processes for the Acquisition of Electronic Resources in University Libraries | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳雪華,王梅玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 電子資源,採訪,館藏管理,決策,組織管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Electronic resources,Acquisition,Collection management,Decision- making,Organizational management, | en |
dc.relation.page | 140 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 992.25 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。