請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10362
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 辛炳隆(Ping-Lung Hsin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsi-Wen Mao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 茆昔文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:23:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-23 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:23:33Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
一、書籍及期刊 王松柏,2005,簡論勞動法之特殊性格、規範方法與勞動三權在我國之現況,2005年台灣勞動學學術研討會論文集,台北:台灣勞動學會,頁969至1002。 丘昌泰,1998,政策科學之理論與實務-美國與台灣經驗,台北:五南。 台灣勞工陣線,1999,台灣勞工的主張:2000勞動政策白皮書,台北:勞動者雜誌。 成之約,2000,勞資關係體系民主化的意義與方向,民主轉型與經濟衝突,台北:桂冠出版。 朱柔若,1998 ,社會變遷中的勞工問題,台北:揚智出版。 李允傑,1992,台灣工會政策的政治經濟分析,台北:巨流圖書公司。 李允傑,2002,政府與工會,台北:空中大學。 吳瓊恩,2002,公共行政學發展趨勢的探究:三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論基礎,公共行政學報第7期,頁173-220。 吳瓊恩,2007,建構「無謀預的行政倫理」:新公共服務五對概念的比較與檢驗,公共行政學報第23期,頁1-28。 林水波,1999,公共政策論衡,台北:智勝。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花,2005,質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析,身心障礙研究季刊,第2期第3卷,頁122-136。 馬財專,2007,結構網絡的分析及其脈絡,政治科學論叢,第33期,頁1至42。 徐正光,1989,從異化到自主:台灣勞工運動的基本性格和趨勢,台灣新興社會運動」,台北:巨流圖書公司,頁103-125。 張台麟,2005,歐洲聯盟社會對話之機制與經驗,94年行政院勞工委員會推動社會對話宣導會會議資料,台北:行政院勞工委員會,未出版,頁1-15。 張峰益,2010,台灣工會的危機,全產總工訊第34期,頁17-22。 焦興鎧,2003,歐洲聯盟勞資關係法制之建構 ,歐洲統合與臺灣,台北:前衛出版,頁81至132。 黃志隆,2008,'荷蘭與丹麥彈性安全政策的探討:制度主義的生命歷程政策研究途徑',社會政策與社會工作學刊 12(1): 91-144。 黃偉峰,2003,剖析歐洲聯盟正在成型的治理體系,歐美研究第三十三卷第二期,頁291至344。 黃建銘,2010 ,從民主治理觀點論新臺中直轄市之行政區劃策略,文官制度季刊第二卷第一期,頁19-44。 陳敦源、王光旭,2005,歐美政府治理理論與實踐學術研討會論文集,台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。 陳敦源,2006,全民健康保險監理會未來運作機制規劃之研究,九十五年度全民健保監理委員會委託計畫研究案,行政院衛生署。 陳敦源,2009,透明之下的課責:台灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎,文官制度季刊,第一卷第二期,頁21-55。 陳敦源,2009,民主治理:公共行政與民主制度的制度性調和。臺北:五南。 葉陽明,2005,全球化與歐洲統合深化對德國民主治理的衝擊及其回應,臺德學刊,第8期,頁40至76。 楊通軒,1998,聯盟策略與勞工政策:從工會聯盟觀之,勞資關係論叢,第8期,頁119-154。 蔡允棟,2002,新治理與治理工具的選擇:政策設計的層次分析,中國行政評論,第11期第2卷,頁47-76。 蔡秀娟,2006,存在或虛幻?組織信任研究回顧與展望,公共行政學報,第21期,頁163-178。 魯俊孟、張正良,2009,民主治理下課責機制之檢驗,發表於2009年11月27至29日金門縣舉辦之兩岸社會政經文化國際學術研討會。 潘世偉,2005,從工業關係到僱用關係,2005年台灣勞動學學術研討會論文集,台北:台灣勞動學會,頁837-862。 劉志鵬,2003,麻雀變老鷹?對集體勞動法修改草案的雜感,勞資關係論文集(一),台北:行政院勞工委員會,頁419-428。 劉坤億,2003,「地方治理與地方政府角色職能的轉變」,國立空中大學,空大行政學報第13期,頁233~268。 戴國榮,2007,變動的勞動世界與台灣工會的未來-第十二屆亞洲社會論壇紀實 ,石油勞工第374期。 謝創智,2010,從工會運作現況談打造新的工會圖像,全產總工訊第34期,頁23-28。 二、網頁 林昭禎,2009,經濟全球化對臺灣勞工權益之影響(2000年至2008年),財團法人國家政策研究基金會網站,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/6323。 張鑫隆,2007,有關日本全國性總工會的幹部訓練和勞工教育,勞動者雜誌第145期,http://labor.ngo.org.tw/weekly/c271020.htm。 陳正良,2001 ,新世紀的勞資關係-台灣工會體系之問題剖析與改革建議,財團法人國家政策研究基金會網站,http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/090/SS-R-090-035.htm。 陳正良,2002,破除國內經社迷障:強化社會夥伴和社會對話功能,財團法人國家政策研究基金會http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/091/SS-C-091-181.htm。 陳正良,2005,我國勞資關係情勢報告-台灣工會架構現況分析,行政院勞工委員會集體協商資訊服務網網站,http://cb.cla.gov.tw/content/labor/labor04_01.php?sn=151。 焦興鎧,2002,社會夥伴與現代勞動法制之建構:從歐洲聯盟之經驗談起,財團法人國家政策研究基金會http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/091/SS-C-091-215.htm。 潘世偉,2006,我國勞資關係路線圖:藍海策略之思考,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/095/SS-B-095-021.htm。 貳、西文部分: 1、 書籍及期刊: 周志杰,2004,Assessing Effects of Globalization on Intra-state Political Governance: A Comparison between Corporatist States in Latin America and West Europe.發表於2004年9月18-19日2004年中國政治學會年會暨學術研討會。 Lindblom,Charles E.,Edward Woodhouse,J.原著,陳恆鈞、王崇斌、李珊瑩譯,2001,台北:韋伯,譯自The Policy-Making Process,1993,3(ed). Bang,H.P.,2004,Culture Governance: Governing Self‐Reflexive Modernity,Public Administration, 82(1),pp.157-190. Bevir, M. and R.A.W. Rhodes. 2003. ‘Decentering British Governance: From Bureaucracy to Networks’.pp. 61-78. Bressers, Hans and Stefan Kuks ,2003,What Does “Governance” Mean?From Conception to Elaborlation.Achieving sustainable development: the challenge of governance across social Scales. Londen:Praeger,p.p.65-88. Cawson, A.,1986 Corporatism and Political Theory (Oxford: Basil Blackwell,pp.66. Cohen, J. and J. Rogers, eds.,1995,Associations and Democracy. Oxford: Verso Books. Goodin,R.E. 1996. Institutions and their design. The Theory of Institutional Design,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,pp.1-53. Deacon, B. ,and Hulse, M. and Stubbs, P.,1997,Global Social Policy: international organizations and the future of welfare. London: Sage. Hartog, J. (1999).Wither Dutch corporatism? Two Decades of Employment Policies and Welfare Reform. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 46(4),pp.458-487. Hassel,A.,1999, `The erosion of industrial relations in Germany', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37,pp.483-505. Heijden, Jurgen van der, Rob Prins ,2007, Governance Process Management.Dutch State of the Art and Future Expectations, Utrecht:AT Osborne Company. Hirst, P. and G. Thompson,1995,“Globalization and the Future of the Nation State.” Economy and Society, 24: 408-442. Hooghe, Liesbet, 1996, “Introduction: Reconciling EU-Wide Policy and National Diversity”, in Cohesion policy and European integration: building multi-level governance, Oxford:Clarendon Press,pp.1–24. Jackson, Michael P.,1991,An Introduction to Industrial Relations,London:Routledge,pp. 12-15. Jann W.,2003,“State, Adminstration and Governance in Germany: Competing Traditions and Dominant Narratives”,Public Administration ,81(1), 2003 (95–118) Jessop, Bob ,2003,“Governance and meta-governance: on reflexiveity, requisite variety and requisite irony”, Governance as Social and Political Communication ,Manchester: Manchester University Press,pp.101-116 . Katz,Harry C.,Thomas A. Kochan & Alexander J.S.Colvin,2008,An Introduction to Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations,New-York,NY:McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Kerremans,B.,1996,“Do Institutions Make a Difference? Non-institutionalism, Neo-institutionalism, and the Logic of Common Decision-Making in the European Union.” Governance,9,217-40. Kettl,Donald F.,2000, The Global Public Management Revolution:A Report on the Transformation of Governance,Brookings Institution Press. Kickert W.J.M.,F.A.van Vught(eds),1995,Public policy and administration sciences in The Netherlands,Hemel Hempstead:Harvester Wheatsheaf. Kickert, W.J.M. 1997.‘Public Governance in the Netherlands: An Alternative to Anglo-American ‘Managerialism’, Public Administration Vol. 75 Winter 1997 (731–752). Kickert, W.J.M.,2002,Pyblic Governance in Small Continental European States. International Journal of Public Administration 25(12):1471-1491. Kooiman,Jan,ed.,1993 ,Modern Governance: New government- society interactions, London: Sage. Kooiman,J.,1999,“Social Political Governance: Overview, Reflections and Design”,Public Management, 1(1),pp.67-92. Kooiman, J.,2000,‘Societal Governance: Level, Modes and Orders of Social-PoliticalInteraction’,Debating Governance. Authority,Steering and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 138-64. Kooiman, J.,2003,Governing as Governance. London: Sage Publications. Meuleman,Louis,2008,Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets:The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations ,Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. Meer, M. van der, J.Visser, T.Wilthagen, Paul F. van der Heijden,2004,Adaptive and reflexive governance - Changing boundaries of national socialeconomic decision-making in the Netherlands.Industrial Relations in Europe Conference (IREC),Utrecht School of Governance, 26 – 28 August 2004. Pennen, Ton V. D.,2005,“Actor strategies in decentralized policy networks.”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20: 301–315. Pierre,J.,and B.G.Peters,2000, Governance, Politics and the State, Basingstoke: Macmillan. Rose, R. ,1993, Lesson Drawing in Public Policy, Chatham House, NJ. Rose, R. (Ed.). ,2003, Challenge to governance: Studies in overloaded polities. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Rosenau,J.N.,1995,Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Goverance, 1,pp.13-43. Rhodes,R.A.W.,1996,The New Governance: Governing Without Government, Political Studies, 44(4): 652-667. Rhodes,R.A.W.,2000,Governance and Public Administration,Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Decmocracy,pp.54-59. Smouts,M.,C.,1998,“The proper use of governance in international relations,”International Social Science Journal, No.155, pp.81-89. Sørensen E. and J. Torfing ,2008,Measuring the Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks:the case of the Femern Belt Forum,http://diggy.ruc.dk/handle/1800/4125。 Streek,1995,German Capitalism:Does It Exist? Can It Survive?New Political Economy,2(2),pp.237–256. Torfing, J. (2005) `Governance Network Theory: Towards a Second Generation', European Political Science 4(3),pp.305-15. Van Kersbergen, K.,and F.Van Waarden,2004,“Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problem of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research,43,pp.143-171. Van Waarden, F. (2002) ‘Dutch Consociationalism and Corporatism: A Case of Institutional Persistence’, Acta Politica 37(1/2; special issue): 44–68. Vliet, M. v. ,1993, Environmental regulation of business: options and constraints for communicative governance. In Jan Kooiman (Ed.), Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Newbury Park, California: Sage. Visser J.,1998,‘The Netherlands: the return of responsive corporatism’,in Ferner, A., and Hyman, R.,Changing industrial relations in Europe, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 283-314 . Weiss, L.,1998,The Mythof the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Woltjer,J.,2000,Consensus Planning:the Relevance of Communicative Planning Theory in Dutch Infrastructure Development,Ashgate: Aldershot. 二、網頁 Fitzenberger,B., Karsten Kohn and Alexander C. Lembcke ,2008, Union Density and Varieties of Coverage: The Anatomy of Union Wage Effects in GermanyZEW Discussion Paper No. 08-012, Mannheim.http://www.zew.de/en/publikationen/publikation.php3?action=detail&nr=4262. Kemmerling,A.,Oliver Bruttel,2005,New Politics in German Labour Market Policy?The Implications of the Recent Hartz Reforms for the German Welfare State. http://bibliothek.wz-berlin.de/pdf/2005/i05-101.pdf. Streeck, Wolfgang, “German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive?”, MPIFG Discussion Paper, November 1995. Available from: http:// www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de (accessed 28 February 2010) Stone,Diane,2000,‘Learning Lessons, Policy Transfer and the International Diffusion of Policy Ideas’, 下載於Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation網站,http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/abstracts/abwp6901/ Tömmel,Ingeborg,2007,Modes of governance in the EU,Paper presented for the EUSA-Conference 2007:Montreal, http://www.unc.edu/euce/eusa2007/papers/toemmel-i-12g.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10362 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在許多國家政策參與及治理的過程中,工會往往扮演相當重要的角色,甚至成為共同決定政策的社會伙伴,在我國工會的發展中卻遭遇許多的阻礙,諸如法令的限制、政治的影響、勞動意識不足等,使得工會在集體勞資關係中無法發揮應有的角色,遑論工會能在參與政策及治理的過程中發揮其影響力。同時政府對於開放決策場域讓工會參與決策仍有很大疑慮,制度上提供讓工會參與的案例不多,國內也缺乏相關的研究,故這領域的研究仍有待填補。
本研究藉由治理理論的探討,以及訪談資料的蒐集,綜合分析後之結果顯示,工會具有參與政策及治理過程的利基與劣勢。工會藉由勞工集體聲音的表達,最容易獲得勞工政策參與的機會,若政府能適當地給予工會參與政策及治理的管道及協助,加上工會自我能力的提升,工會在許多層面確實能成為政府政策的諮商者、資訊提供者,乃至共同治理的社會伙伴。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Trade unions play vital role in government policy participation in many countries. In some advanced economies, the trade union movement even shares policy governance with the employers and government and being called as social partners. In Taiwan, the trade unions’ role in policy participation and governance has been retarded as a result of legal and political factors. Consequently trade unions’ function in the public policy participation and governance is limited. In addition, trade unions’ opportunities to participate public policy and acted as partner in policy governance is also reduced. Therefore trade unions cannot play effective role in social dialogue, not to even mention monitoring the outcome of the public policy. In Taiwan, domestic researchers have generally focused on the study of the role of trade unions in collective labor relations, trade unions’ policy participation and governance has been ignored without careful exploration. It is the purpose of this study to uncover such an issue to supplement the gap of contemporary public policy research.
This study shows that even legal and political factors have been subsequently restricted trade unions capability to participate and govern public policy in Taiwan; it is still possible for trade unions to participate and share governance in public policy. According to our theory analysis and data collected from intensive interviews, this study finds that trade unions are likely to obtain opportunities to participate and govern public policy if trade unions are able to express their collective voices. It is also suggested that trade unions are also possible to be invited as government advisors, information providers, and even as social partners with other social groups, given that appropriate channels and assistance provided by the government. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:23:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R93322035-1.pdf: 964060 bytes, checksum: 172e47d92386123ec5dfe7719b918920 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………… 2 第二節 研究目的與問題………………………………………… 3 第三節 研究範圍與架構………………………………………… 6 第四節 研究限制………………………………………………… 9 第五節 章節安排………………………………………………… 9 第二章 治理理論………………………………………………… 11 第一節 治理的緣起與定義……………………………………… 11 第二節 治理理論的論證………………………………………… 15 第三節 治理的模式……………………………………………… 22 第四節 治理的兩難……………………………………………… 31 第三章 工會參與治理的劣勢與危機…………………………… 37 第一節 台灣獨特的勞資關係體系……………………………… 37 第二節 工會的利害關係人與政策夥伴角色…………………… 39 第三節 外部劣勢………………………………………………… 44 第四節 內部威脅………………………………………………… 50 第四章 治理學習對象…………………………………………… 63 第一節 德國……………………………………………………… 64 第二節 荷蘭……………………………………………………… 72 第三節 歐盟……………………………………………………… 80 第五章 參與治理的策略應用…………………………………… 87 第一節 影響參與治理的因素…………………………………… 87 第二節 制度建構策略…………………………………………… 95 第三節 政策學習策略…………………………………………… 104 第四節 小結……………………………………………………… 109 第六章 結論與政策建議………………………………………… 112 第一節 研究結論………………………………………………… 112 第二節 政策建議………………………………………………… 115 ◎ 參考文獻……………………………………………………… 122 ◎ 附錄…………………………………………………………… 132 附錄1:訪談問卷大綱提要……………………………………… 132 附錄2-1:A1政治大學勞工研究所教授訪談紀錄……………… 134 附錄2-2:A2文化大學法律系教授訪談紀錄…………………… 138 附錄2-3:A3開南大學通識教育中心教授訪談紀錄…………… 142 附錄2-4:B1行政院勞工委員會官員訪談紀錄………………… 147 附錄2-5:B2行政院勞工委員會官員訪談紀錄………………… 150 附錄2-6:B3行政院勞工委員會官員訪談紀錄………………… 154 附錄2-7:C1全國性總工會副秘書長訪談紀錄………………… 158 附錄2-9:C2全國性各業工會聯合會秘書長訪談紀錄………… 163 附錄2-10:C3全國性總工會顧問訪談紀錄……………………… 168 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣工會參與政策與治理之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of Taiwan Trade Unions’ Policy Participation and Governance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹火生,潘世偉 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 工會,參與政策,治理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Trade Unions,Policy Participations,Governance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 170 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 941.46 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。