請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/103333完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林致廷 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chih-Ting Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡思彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Szu-Yen Hu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-10T16:41:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-11 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-08-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-07-23 00:00:00 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
[1] B. Kloesel, J. A. DiNardo, and S. C. Body, “Cardiac Embryology and Molecular Mechanisms of Congenital Heart Disease: a Primer for Anesthesiologists,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 551–569, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001451. [2] B. J. Bouma and B. J. M. Mulder, “Changing Landscape of Congenital Heart Disease,” Circulation Research, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 908–922, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1161/circresaha.116.309302. [3] R. Sun, M. Liu, L. Lu, Y. Zheng, and P. Zhang, “Congenital Heart Disease: Causes, Diagnosis, Symptoms, and Treatments,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 857–860, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s12013-015-0551-6. [4] T. F. Lüscher, “Congenital heart disease: some progress, but still the challenge of a lifetime!,” European Heart Journal, vol. 38, no. 26, pp. 2021–2023, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx372. [5] H. N. A. Kindi, M. M. Maddali, P. S. Kandachar, and R. H. Anderson, “Enhancing management of double outlet right ventricle when the interventricular communication is remote from the arterial roots through three-dimensional printing,” 3D Print Med, vol. 11, p. 18, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s41205-025-00265-y. [6] G. Graham, J. A. Dearani, T. Niaz, S. Crow, F. Cetta, and E. H. Stephens, “Outcomes of Biventricular and Single Ventricle Heterotaxy Patients: A Single Center Five-Decade Experience,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 1206–1211, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.045. [7] S.-Y. Hu et al., “Impact of the pulmonary venous entry site morphology on postoperative pulmonary vein stenosis in total anomalous pulmonary venous connection patients,” J Formos Med Assoc, vol. 124, no. 9, pp. 809–815, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2024.09.006. [8] J. Zhu et al., “Losartan ameliorates ‘upstream’ pulmonary vein vasculopathy in a piglet model of pulmonary vein stenosis,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 2550–2557, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.050. [9] E. N. Feins et al., “Pulmonary vein stenosis: Anatomic considerations, surgical management, and outcomes,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 2198-2207.e3, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.022. [10] I. Valverde et al., “Three-dimensional printed models for surgical planning of complex congenital heart defects: an international multicentre study,” Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1139–1148, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx208. [11] E. Mejia, S. Sweeney, and J. E. Zablah, “Virtual 3D reconstruction of complex congenital cardiac anatomy from 3D rotational angiography,” 3D Print Med, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 4, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s41205-024-00247-6. [12] K. Giesbrecht, S. Rossi, S. Liu, S. Mukherjee, M. Bressan, and B. E. Griffith, “An anatomically informed computational fluid dynamics modeling approach for quantifying hemodynamics in the developing heart,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 5, p. e0322233, May 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322233. [13] K. Pekkan et al., “Patient-specific surgical planning and hemodynamic computational fluid dynamics optimization through free-form haptic anatomy editing tool (SURGEM),” Med Biol Eng Comput, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1139–1152, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11517-008-0377-0. [14] S. J. Yoo et al., “3D Modeling and Printing in Congenital Heart Surgery: Entering the Stage of Maturation,” Front Pediatr, vol. 9, p. 621672, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.621672. [15] D. M. Tran et al., “Minimally Invasive Surgical Repair of Simple Congenital Heart Defects Using the Right Vertical Infra-Axillary Thoracotomy Approach,” Innovations (Phila), vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 520–525, 2024, doi: 10.1177/15569845241273650. [16] P. R. Bayya et al., “Transaxillary Approach for Surgical Repair of Simple Congenital Cardiac Lesions: Pitfalls, and Complications,” World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 337–343, May 2021, doi: 10.1177/2150135121989663. [17] A. Fedorov et al., “3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network,” Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1323–1341, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. [18] C. C. Long, M.-C. Hsu, Y. Bazilevs, J. A. Feinstein, and A. L. Marsden, “Fluid-structure interaction simulations of the Fontan procedure using variable wall properties,” Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 513–527, May 2012, doi: 10.1002/cnm.1485. [19] S.-Y. Hu, H.-W. Chou, Y.-C. Wang, S.-J. Chen, Y.-S. Chen, and S.-C. Huang, “Nikaidoh Procedure for Double Outlet Right Ventricle With Transposition of the Great Arteries and Superior-Inferior Ventricles,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery Short Reports, doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2025.12.002. [20] S.-Y. Hu, Y.-C. Wang, H.-W. Chou, Y.-S. Chen, C.-T. Lin, and S.-C. Huang, “Development of a web-based preoperative planner for right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy,” Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon), vol. 31, no. 1, p. 2635776, Dec. 2026, doi: 10.1080/24699322.2026.2635776. [21] H. L. Walters, C. Mavroudis, C. I. Tchervenkov, J. P. Jacobs, F. Lacour-Gayet, and M. L. Jacobs, “Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project: double outlet right ventricle,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 69, no. 4 Suppl, pp. S249-263, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01247-3. [22] H. W. Goo, “Double Outlet Right Ventricle: In-Depth Anatomic Review Using Three-Dimensional Cardiac CT Data,” Korean J Radiol, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1894–1908, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0248. [23] A. F. Corno, S. Durairaj, and G. J. Skinner, “Narrative review of assessing the surgical options for double outlet right ventricle,” Transl Pediatr, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 165–176, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.21037/tp-20-227. [24] R. H. Anderson, A. E. Becker, B. R. Wilcox, F. J. Macartney, and J. L. Wilkinson, “Surgical anatomy of double-outlet right ventricle--a reappraisal,” Am J Cardiol, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 555–559, Sep. 1983, doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90025-5. [25] S.-J. Yoo and G. S. van Arsdell, “3D Printing in Surgical Management of Double Outlet Right Ventricle,” Front Pediatr, vol. 5, p. 289, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00289. [26] J. J. Peek et al., “Optimized preoperative planning of double outlet right ventricle patients by 3D printing and virtual reality: a pilot study,” Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, vol. 37, no. 2, p. ivad072, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad072. [27] S. Ganta, J. R. Ryan, M. J. Lewis, and J. J. Nigro, “Surgical Repair of Double Outlet Right Ventricle Infants Guided by Three Dimensional-Computed Tomography Cardiac Modeling and Printing,” World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 500–508, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1177/21501351241305129. [28] H. Al Kindi et al., “Surgical repair of unusual variant of double-outlet right ventricle with discordant atrioventricular connections and superior-inferior ventricles,” JTCVS Tech, vol. 24, pp. 145–149, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.12.004. [29] H. Nikaidoh, “Aortic translocation and biventricular outflow tract reconstruction. A new surgical repair for transposition of the great arteries associated with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 365–372, Sep. 1984. [30] E. A. Bacha, S. N. Nguyen, R. Vanderlaan, D. J. LaPar, A. B. Goldstone, and D. M. Kalfa, “Aortic root translocation (Nikaidoh) procedure for complex transposition of the great arteries with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction,” JTCVS Tech, vol. 22, pp. 243–250, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.10.006. [31] F. Li et al., “Analysis of the therapeutic effect of right mid-axillary approach in the surgical treatment of ASD and VSD in children,” J Cardiothorac Surg, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 587, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03105-y. [32] C.-X. Hu, J. Tan, S. Chen, H. Ding, and Z.-W. Xu, “Comparison of clinical outcomes and postoperative recovery between two open heart surgeries: minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracomy and traditional median sternotomy,” Asian Pac J Trop Med, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 625–629, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60105-X. [33] U. H. Nguyen et al., “Doubly committed ventricular septal defect: Is it safe to perform surgical closure through the pulmonary trunk approached by right vertical axillary thoracotomy?,” JTCVS Open, vol. 15, pp. 368–373, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.012. [34] K. An, S. Li, J. Yan, X. Wang, and Z. Hua, “Minimal Right Vertical Infra-axillary Incision for Repair of Congenital Heart Defects,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 896–902, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.052. [35] L. Yan et al., “Right vertical infra-axillary mini-incision for repair of simple congenital heart defects: a matched-pair analysis,” Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 136–141, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs280. [36] S. M. Said et al., “Safety and Efficacy of Right Axillary Thoracotomy for Repair of Congenital Heart Defects in Children,” World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 47–54, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/21501351221127283. [37] Q. Wang, Q. Li, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, Q. Zhou, and D. Wang, “Ventricular septal defects closure using a minimal right vertical infraaxillary thoracotomy: seven-year experience in 274 patients,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 552–555, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.11.026. [38] J. Dodge-Khatami, A. Dodge-Khatami, T. D. Nguyen, and A. Rüffer, “Minimal invasive approaches for pediatric & congenital heart surgery: safe, reproducible, more cosmetic than through sternotomy, and here to stay,” Transl Pediatr, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1744–1752, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.21037/tp-23-282. [39] P. Grieshaber et al., “A Low-Cost Workflow to Generate Virtual and Physical Three-Dimensional Models of Cardiac Structures,” World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 107–113, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1177/21501351241293305. [40] A. Atalay et al., “Can Right Infra-Axillary Vertical Thoracotomy Make a Big Difference in Surgical Technique Preference?,” Heart Lung Circ, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1419–1424, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.661. [41] H. Luo et al., “Right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy for surgical repair of paediatric ventricular septal defect: a propensity score matched cohort study,” Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, vol. 40, no. 8, p. ivaf153, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf153. [42] J.-H. Wu et al., “Airway Anomalies in Pediatric Patients After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study, Taiwan, 2017-2020,” Pediatr Crit Care Med, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. e438–e446, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003592. [43] C. Richardson et al., “Comparison of Slide Tracheoplasty Technique on Postoperative Anatomic Outcomes in Three-Dimensional Printed Models,” Laryngoscope, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 1306–1312, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1002/lary.29874. [44] C. M. Richardson et al., “Multidisciplinary Advanced Surgical Planning for Slide Tracheoplasty Using 3D-Printed Models,” Laryngoscope, vol. 134, no. 7, pp. 3395–3401, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1002/lary.31327. [45] N. Shimojima et al., “Outcomes of slide tracheoplasty for congenital tracheal stenosis in 80 children: A 22-year single-center experience,” J Pediatr Surg, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1205–1209, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.02.033. [46] A. Maltezeanu et al., “Slide tracheoplasty for congenital tracheal stenosis: A systematic review,” Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, vol. 182, p. 111993, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111993. [47] Y. Wu et al., “Slide Tracheoplasty for Congenital Tracheal Stenosis Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Laryngoscope, vol. 132, no. 8, pp. 1532–1541, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1002/lary.29771. [48] M. A. DeMarcantonio et al., “Slide tracheoplasty outcomes in children with congenital pulmonary malformations,” Laryngoscope, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 1283–1287, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1002/lary.26404. [49] A. de Alarcon and M. J. Rutter, “Cervical slide tracheoplasty,” Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, vol. 138, no. 9, pp. 812–816, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1001/archoto.2012.1768. [50] R. Agarwal, R. Varghese, V. Jesudian, and J. Moses, “The heterotaxy syndrome: associated congenital heart defects and management,” Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 37, no. Suppl 1, pp. 67–81, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-00935-y. [51] W. Chen et al., “Outcomes of treatment for right atrial isomerism with functional single ventricle and extracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection beyond neonatal period: Delayed surgical treatment, improving outcomes,” Front Cardiovasc Med, vol. 9, p. 914609, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.914609. [52] A. Baban et al., “Long-term survival and phenotypic spectrum in heterotaxy syndrome: A 25-year follow-up experience,” Int J Cardiol, vol. 268, pp. 100–105, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.050. [53] C. Frescura, S. Y. Ho, M. Giordano, and G. Thiene, “Isomerism of the atrial appendages: morphology and terminology,” Cardiovasc Pathol, vol. 47, p. 107205, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2020.107205. [54] U. K. Chowdhury et al., “Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Patients With Isomeric Right and Left Atrial Appendages,” World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 291–299, May 2023, doi: 10.1177/21501351221151049. [55] M. P. Eronen, K. A. U. Aittomäki, E. O. Kajantie, H. I. Sairanen, and E. J. Pesonen, “The outcome of patients with right atrial isomerism is poor,” Pediatr Cardiol, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 302–307, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0445-y. [56] D.-H. Kim and T.-J. Yun, “Anatomic repair for ventriculoarterial discordance associated with right atrial isomerism and complex pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 168, no. 4, pp. 1213–1218, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.10.019. [57] G. Graham, J. A. Dearani, T. Niaz, S. Crow, F. Cetta, and E. H. Stephens, “Outcomes of Biventricular and Single Ventricle Heterotaxy Patients: A Single Center Five-Decade Experience,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 1206–1211, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.045. [58] K. Imai et al., “Long-term outcome of patients with right atrial isomerism after common atrioventricular valve plasty,” Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 987–994, May 2017, doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx001. [59] Y.-Q. Jin et al., “Mid-term outcomes of atrioventricular valve repair in functional single ventricle patients,” Front Cardiovasc Med, vol. 11, p. 1510143, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1510143. [60] H. W. Goo et al., “Pediatric Cardiothoracic CT Guideline Provided by the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Congenital Heart Disease Study Group: Part 2. Contemporary Clinical Applications,” Korean J Radiol, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1397–1415, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1332. [61] N. Ota et al., “Improving outcomes of the surgical management of right atrial isomerism,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 832–838; discussion 838-839, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.110. [62] S. P. Marathe et al., “Outcomes of the Fontan Operation for Patients With Heterotaxy: A Meta-Analysis of 848 Patients,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 307–315, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.027. [63] H. C. Grillo, “Slide tracheoplasty for long-segment congenital tracheal stenosis,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 613-619 discussion 619-621, Sep. 1994, doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90714-5. [64] L. Chen et al., “Surgical management strategy of slide tracheoplasty for infants with congenital tracheal stenosis,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 2218–2228, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.047. [65] H. C. Grillo, C. D. Wright, G. J. Vlahakes, and T. E. MacGillivray, “Management of congenital tracheal stenosis by means of slide tracheoplasty or resection and reconstruction, with long-term follow-up of growth after slide tracheoplasty,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 145–152, Jan. 2002. [66] M. Maeda and H. C. Grillo, “Effect of tension on tracheal growth after resection and anastomosis in puppies,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 658–668, Apr. 1973. [67] S.-J. Chen, E.-T. Wu, C.-C. Wang, H.-W. Chou, Y.-S. Chen, and S.-C. Huang, “Excessive Tracheal Length in Patients With Congenital Tracheal Stenosis,” Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 138–145, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.059. [68] R. S. Loomba, K. Nijhawan, and R. Anderson, “Impact of Era, Type of Isomerism, and Ventricular Morphology on Survival in Heterotaxy: Implications for Therapeutic Management,” World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 54–62, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2150135115601831. [69] P. J. Kilner, G. Z. Yang, A. J. Wilkes, R. H. Mohiaddin, D. N. Firmin, and M. H. Yacoub, “Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart,” Nature, vol. 404, no. 6779, pp. 759–761, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1038/35008075. [70] P. E. Hammer, K. McEnaney, R. Callahan, C. W. Baird, D. M. Hoganson, and K. J. Jenkins, “The Role of Elevated Wall Shear Stress in Progression of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: Evidence from Two Case Studies,” Children (Basel), vol. 8, no. 9, p. 729, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/children8090729. [71] Y. Cheng, A. Qiao, Y. Yang, and X. Fan, “Numerical Simulation of Hemodynamics in Two Models for Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection Surgery,” Front Physiol, vol. 11, p. 206, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00206. [72] J. Jin, K. Gu, J. Liang, J. Yu, and X. Fan, “Numerical modeling assisting in surgical treatment of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection in children,” World J Pediatr Surg, vol. 7, no. 3, p. e000741, 2024, doi: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000741. [73] J. Jin, K. Gu, J. Liang, J. Yu, and X. Fan, “Numerical modeling assisting in surgical treatment of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection in children,” World J Pediatr Surg, vol. 7, no. 3, p. e000741, 2024, doi: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000741. [74] Y. Cheng, A. Qiao, Y. Yang, and X. Fan, “Numerical Simulation of Hemodynamics in Two Models for Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection Surgery,” Front Physiol, vol. 11, p. 206, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00206. [75] J. Jin, X. Ma, X. Fu, Z. Zhang, and J. Yu, “Fluid-Structure Interaction Model for Predicting Surgical Result of Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection and Estimating Pulmonary Venous Properties,” Cardiovasc Eng Technol, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 725–734, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13239-022-00613-7. [76] S.-Y. Hu et al., “Impact of the pulmonary venous entry site morphology on postoperative pulmonary vein stenosis in total anomalous pulmonary venous connection patients,” J Formos Med Assoc, vol. 124, no. 9, pp. 809–815, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2024.09.006. [77] E. N. Feins et al., “Pulmonary vein stenosis: Anatomic considerations, surgical management, and outcomes,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 2198-2207.e3, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.022. [78] J. Zhu et al., “Losartan ameliorates ‘upstream’ pulmonary vein vasculopathy in a piglet model of pulmonary vein stenosis,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 2550–2557, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.050. [79] P. E. Hammer, K. McEnaney, R. Callahan, C. W. Baird, D. M. Hoganson, and K. J. Jenkins, “The Role of Elevated Wall Shear Stress in Progression of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: Evidence from Two Case Studies,” Children (Basel), vol. 8, no. 9, p. 729, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/children8090729. [80] J. Lantz et al., “Impact of Pulmonary Venous Inflow on Cardiac Flow Simulations: Comparison with In Vivo 4D Flow MRI,” Ann Biomed Eng, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 413–424, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-02153-5. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/103333 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 複雜性先天性心臟病具有極端複雜的解剖異質性,且大多數需要多次手術介入處理。由於解剖之變異性大,手術前之詳細規劃與血流動力學之預測格外重要,然而傳統二維影像難以完整呈現其三維空間關係。本論文建立一套漸進式之計算工程平台,應用於多種先天性心臟病及縱膈腔疾病,從三維手術模擬進階至幾何型態計算學,最終延伸至計算血流動力學評估,以優化複雜先天性心臟病的手術決策與預後預測。
在手術模擬階段,本研究針對極度複雜之上下型右心室雙出口構造,透過虛擬手術預測傳統修補對於右心室出入口之壓迫,並驗證大動脈根部轉位術之可行性。在兒童微創心臟手術規劃上,開發了幾何射線演算法將手術室視野量化為可見度分數。15例臨床驗證顯示模擬器預測之主動脈管路插管位置分數是決定術中視野困難度之最顯著因子 (rho=-0.710, p=0.003)。 在幾何型態計算學階段,針對先天性氣管狹窄手術推導出斜切式滑動氣管整形術之幾何公式,5例應用顯示術後截面積增加327.2%,長度縮短僅15.8%,優於文獻報告之40-50%。此外針對右心房異構症合併功能性單一心室此一罕見疾病,提出心尖偏移指數(AEI)作為手術後長期存活預後指標,cox-LASSO迴歸中AEI為唯一獨立預測因子 (HR=0.088, p=0.002),交叉驗證C指數達0.764。且高AEI組存活率78.6%,顯著優於低AEI組之23.1% (p=0.005)。 在血流動力學計算階段,對6例心外型全肺靜脈回流異常術後病患建立8個計算流體力學模型並計算量化。壁面剪應力變異係數可顯著區分狹窄與非狹窄模型(p=0.0098),DBSCAN演算法則依照剪應力之高群聚區域定位高剪應力熱區,且與實際手術術中之發現高度一致。 本論文建立了從影像重建到功能性預測之計算架構,將複雜的三維解剖構造轉化為可量化的臨床指標,為複雜性先天性心臟病之精準計算手術提供系統性的工程基礎。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Complex congenital heart diseases (CHD) exhibit extreme anatomical heterogeneity and frequently require multiple surgical interventions. Due to this high anatomical variability, detailed preoperative planning and hemodynamic predictions are critical; however, traditional 2D imaging fails to adequately capture their complex 3D spatial relationships. This thesis establishes a progressive computational engineering platform applied to various CHDs and mediastinal diseases. Advancing from 3D surgical simulation to geometric morphometrics, and ultimately to computational hemodynamics, this platform aims to optimize surgical decision-making and prognostic predictions for complex CHD.
In the surgical simulation phase, virtual surgery was utilized on the highly complex superior-inferior double outlet right ventricle to predict the compression of the right ventricular inflow and outflow tracts caused by traditional repair, successfully validating the feasibility of aortic root translocation. For pediatric minimally invasive cardiac surgery planning, a geometric ray-casting algorithm was developed to quantify the surgical field of view into visibility scores. Clinical validation across 15 cases revealed that the simulator-predicted visibility score for the aortic cannulation site was a significant determinant of intraoperative visual difficulty (rho = -0.710, p = 0.003). In the geometric morphometrics phase, geometric formulas for oblique slide tracheoplasty were derived for congenital tracheal stenosis. Application in 5 cases demonstrated a 327.2% increase in postoperative cross-sectional area with only a 15.8% reduction in length, significantly outperforming the 40-50% length reduction reported in the literature. Furthermore, for the rare condition of right atrial isomerism (RAI) with a functional single ventricle, the Apical Eccentricity Index (AEI) was proposed as a prognostic indicator for long-term postoperative survival. In Cox-LASSO regression analysis, AEI emerged as the sole independent predictor (HR = 0.088, p = 0.002) with a cross-validated C-index of 0.764. The survival rate in the high-AEI group (78.6%) was significantly superior to that of the low-AEI group (23.1%, p = 0.005). In the hemodynamic computation phase, 8 computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models were established and quantified for 6 patients following the repair of extracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC). The coefficient of variation of wall shear stress (WSS) significantly differentiated stenotic from non-stenotic models (p = 0.0098). Additionally, the DBSCAN algorithm localized high WSS hotspots based on high-clustering regions, demonstrating high consistency with actual intraoperative findings. In conclusion, this thesis establishes a comprehensive computational framework ranging from image reconstruction to functional prediction. By translating complex 3D anatomical structures into quantifiable clinical indices, it provides a systematic engineering foundation for precision computational surgery in complex CHD. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-08-10T16:41:22Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-08-10T16:41:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract v Content viii List of Figures xiii List of Tables xv List of Abbreviations xvi Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Clinical Background 1 1.2 The Engineering Gap 2 1.3 Research Objectives 3 1.3.1 Aim 1: To establish patient-specific 3D modeling platforms for virtual surgical planning 4 1.3.2 Aim 2: To develop quantitative geometric morphometric indices for risk stratification. 4 1.3.3 Aim 3: To investigate the functional hemodynamic mechanism based on patient-specific 3D models 4 1.4 Thesis Organization 4 1.4.1 Chapter 1:General Introduction 4 1.4.2 Chapter 2: General Computational Framework. 5 1.4.3 Chapter 3: Aim 1: Surgical Simulation 5 1.4.4 Chapter 4: Aim 2: Geometric Morphometrics 5 1.4.5 Chapter 5: Aim 3: Hemodynamic Analysis. 5 1.4.6 Chapter 6: Integration and Translation 6 Chapter 2. General Materials and Methodologies 7 2.1 Overview of the Integrated Computational Framework 7 2.1.1 Image Acquisition and Import 7 2.2 Segmentation Protocols and Reconstruction Strategies 8 2.2.1 Protocol A: Intraluminal Blood Pool Reconstruction: 8 2.2.2 Protocol B: Soft Tissue and Structural Morphology 8 2.2.3 Protocol C: Hollow Structure Generation (Shelling) 9 2.3 Manual Refinement and Expert Validation 10 2.4 Geometric Landmarking and Feature Definition 10 2.4.1 Fiducial Registration 11 2.4.2 Curve and Boundary Interpolation 11 2.5 Models Generation and Export 11 2.6 Ethical Approval for each thesis 12 Chapter 3. Application of Patient-Specific 3D Modeling in Surgical Simulation and Preoperative Planning 13 3.1 Introduction 14 3.1.1 Scenario 1: The Intracardiac Challenge: Complex DORV and Procedure Selection: 14 3.1.2 Scenario 2: The Extracardiac Challenge: Optimization of Minimally Invasive Access 17 3.2 Methodology: Simulation Frameworks 17 3.2.1 Intracardiac Simulation Workflow: Virtual Surgery for Complex DORV: 18 3.2.2 Extracardiac Simulation Workflow: The Geometric Ray-Casting Algorithm 18 3.3 Results-1: Intracardiac Decision Support (Scenario 1) 22 3.3.1 Patient character 22 3.3.2 Simulation-Based Strategy Selection 22 3.3.3 Proceeding surgery and validate the clinical results 25 3.4 Results-2: Extracardiac Simulation Workflow: The Geometric Ray-Casting Algorithm (Scenario 2) 27 3.4.1 Implementation of the Web-Based Planner 28 3.4.2 Patient 1: Optimization for Complex Dual-Pathology 28 3.4.3 Multi-Parametric Sensitivity Analysis 31 3.5 Results-3: Clinical Validation of the Scoring System (Scenario 2) 31 3.5.1 Study Design and Cohort 31 3.5.2 Target Lesion Accessibility: 33 3.5.3 Scores Validation: Simulation Score vs. Surgeon Rating: 33 3.5.4 Geometric Determinants 34 3.6 Discussion 36 3.6.1 The application of 3D reconstruction techniques in preoperative surgical planning for complex congenital heart disease. 36 3.6.2 Extending the Framework: From Intracardiac Repair to Extracardiac Access 37 3.6.3 Clinical Validation: From Proof-of-Concept to Intraoperative Correlation 39 3.7 Conclusions 40 Chapter 4. Geometric Morphometrics: From Subjective Description to Objective Quantification 42 4.1 Introduction 42 4.1.1 Congenital Tracheal Stenosis: Geometric Quantification for Precision Incision Planning for Beveled Slide Tracheoplasty 43 4.1.2 Right Atrial Isomerism with functional single ventricle: Quantifying Ventricular Topology 45 4.2 Methodology 47 4.2.1 Study Population: 47 4.2.2 Part I: Methodology for Designing Geometrically-guide Beveled Slide Tracheoplasty for Congenital Tracheal Stenosis 48 4.2.3 Part II: Methodology for 3D Geometric Assessment for Outcome Analysis in Right Atrial Isomerism Patients 54 4.3 Results Part I: Geometric Optimization in Congenital Tracheal Stenosis 60 4.3.1 Phase I: In Vitro Validation of the Geometric Model 60 4.3.2 Phase II: Clinical Geometric Morphological Analysis: 64 4.4 Results Part II: Geometric Prognostication in Right Atrial Isomerism 68 4.4.1 Baseline Clinical Characteristics of the Study Patients: 69 4.4.2 Geometric Phenotyping: 71 4.4.3 Sub-analysis: Geometry and Intermediate Staging 73 4.4.4 Survival Analysis and Risk Stratification 76 4.4.5 Penalized Multivariable Modeling and Validation 78 4.4.6 Hemodynamic Validation via Computational Fluid Dynamics 78 4.5 Discussion 81 4.5.1 Congenital Tracheal Stenosis: Mathematical Precision in Surgical Reconstruction 81 4.5.2 Right Atrial Isomerism: Ventricular Geometry as a Prognostic Biomarker 83 4.5.3 Methodological Integration: Two Paradigms of Geometric Analysis 86 4.6 Conclusions 87 Chapter 5. Hemodynamic Analysis: From Static Anatomy to Functional Prediction 88 5.1 Introduction 88 5.2 Methods 91 5.2.1 Patient Selection and Study Design 91 5.2.2 Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Computational Domain Preparation 92 5.2.3 Boundary Conditions and Solver Settings 93 5.2.4 Wall Shear Stress Quantification 96 5.2.5 Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise for WSS hotspot clusters detection 97 5.3 Results 98 5.3.1 CFD flow analysis and validation 98 5.3.2 WSS Distribution and Coefficient of Variation 99 5.3.3 DBSCAN Hotspot Localization and Surgical Concordance 102 5.4 Discussion 107 5.4.1 The Hemodynamic Paradigm Shift in TAPVC Management 107 5.4.2 WSS Heterogeneity (CV) as a Predictive Biomarker: 108 5.4.3 Machine Learning-Assisted Surgical Translation: DBSCAN Clustering 109 5.4.4 Limitations and Future Directions 109 5.5 Conclusions 112 Chapter 6. Integrated Discussion, Clinical Translation, and Future Perspectives 113 6.1 Synthesis of the Three-Phase Computational Framework 113 6.2 Methodological Coherence and Cross-Chapter Insights 115 6.3 Limitations 117 6.4 Clinical Translation: Toward Computational Precision Surgery 118 6.5 General Conclusions 120 References 122 Appendix 134 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 先天性心臟病 | - |
| dc.subject | 三維重建 | - |
| dc.subject | 手術模擬 | - |
| dc.subject | 幾何型態計算學 | - |
| dc.subject | 計算流體力學 | - |
| dc.subject | 微創心臟手術 | - |
| dc.subject | congenital heart disease | - |
| dc.subject | three-dimensional reconstruction | - |
| dc.subject | surgical simulation | - |
| dc.subject | geometric morphometric | - |
| dc.subject | computational fluid dynamics | - |
| dc.subject | minimally invasive cardiac surgery | - |
| dc.title | 三維幾何於先天性心臟病之計算分析:從手術規劃、型態量化到血流動力學評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Computational Analysis of Three-Dimensional Geometry in Congenital Heart Disease: From Surgical Planning to Geometric Quantification and Hemodynamic Assessment | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 楊馥菱;黃書健 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Fu-Ling Yang;Shu-Chien Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃念祖;吳毅暉;虞希禹;許華倚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Nien-Tsu Huang;I-Hui Wu;Hsi-Yu Yu;hua-yi hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 先天性心臟病; 三維重建; 手術模擬; 幾何型態計算學; 計算流體力學; 微創心臟手術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | congenital heart disease; three-dimensional reconstruction; surgical simulation; geometric morphometric; computational fluid dynamics; minimally invasive cardiac surgery | en |
| dc.relation.page | 150 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202602284 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-07-27 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-08-11 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 5.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
