請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/103246完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林姿婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Tzu-Ting Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張心瑀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | HSIN-YU CHANG | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-10T16:06:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-11 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-08-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-07-30 00:00:00 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Auer, B. R., & Schuhmacher, F. (2016). Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 59, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002 Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 237–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-1 Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: the mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0101 Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2019). Adoption of CSR and Sustainability Reporting Standards: Economic Analysis and Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3427748 Cui, J., Jo, H., & Na, H. (2018). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Information Asymmetry? Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3003-8 Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226 Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013 Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2008). What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.016 Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2007). Financial development, bank discrimination and trade credit. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(2), 513–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.07.009 Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464498 Guo, Z., Jiang, W., & Ye, K. (2025). Interplay of ESG, Trust, and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence From China’s Listed Companies. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251398698 Haidar, M. I. (2025). Does Societal Trust Reduce Greenwashing? International Evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 3400–3424. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4126 Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0 Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2015). Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2575912 Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures. In Source: Journal of Accounting Research (Vol. 31, Number 2). Autumn. North, D. C. . (2011). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. Porter, M. E., & Van Der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. In Journal of Economic Perspectives (Vol. 9, Number 4). Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029 Williamson, O. E. . (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism : firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press ; Collier Macmillan. Zhu, B., & Wang, Y. (2024). Does social trust affect firms’ ESG performance? International Review of Financial Analysis, 93, 103153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103153 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/103246 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討台灣上市公司之永續表現（ESG）、企業信任與財務績效之關係。研究期間為2014年至2025年，樣本涵蓋991家台灣上市公司，共8,366筆公司年度觀察值。財務績效分別以資產報酬率（ROA）與Tobin’s Q衡量；企業信任則從投資人、債權人、供應商及政府等利害關係人面向建構綜合指標。實證方法採用固定效果迴歸、動態迴歸、中介與調節效果分析。
實證結果顯示，ESG表現與企業財務績效整體呈正向關聯，但其效果主要反映於市場績效。ESG對Tobin’s Q具有顯著且穩健的正向影響，即使控制前一期公司價值後仍然成立；相較之下，ESG對ROA的正向關聯在控制前一期獲利能力後不再顯著，顯示ESG較容易反映於投資人對企業未來價值之評估，而未必立即轉化為當期會計獲利。 此外，企業信任並未在ESG與財務績效之間形成中介效果，但ESG與信任之交乘項呈顯著正向，顯示信任具有調節作用。當企業具備較高信任基礎時，其ESG表現較容易被市場視為可信且具持續性的經營承諾，進而強化ESG對財務績效之正向影響。企業規模與產業特性分析亦顯示，大型企業之ESG表現較能提升企業信任，而高污染產業之ESG表現對市場價值的正向影響較為明顯。整體而言，企業除提升ESG實質表現外，亦應累積利害關係人信任，以提高ESG訊號之可信度與市場接受程度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines the relationships among ESG performance, corporate trust, and financial performance among Taiwanese listed firms. The sample covers 991 firms from 2014 to 2025, with 8,366 firm-year observations. Financial performance is measured by ROA and Tobin’s Q, while corporate trust is constructed from the perspectives of investors, creditors, suppliers, and the government. The empirical analysis includes fixed-effects regressions, dynamic models, and mediation and moderation tests.
The results show that ESG performance is positively associated with financial performance, mainly through market-based valuation. ESG has a significant and robust positive effect on Tobin’s Q, but its positive relationship with ROA becomes insignificant after controlling for lagged profitability. This suggests that ESG is more likely to be reflected in investors’ expectations of future firm value than in current accounting earnings. Corporate trust does not mediate the relationship between ESG and financial performance, but it significantly strengthens the positive effect of ESG. This moderating effect indicates that ESG performance is more likely to be viewed as credible when a firm has a stronger trust foundation. The effect is more evident among larger firms and in highly polluting industries. Overall, firms should improve both substantive ESG performance and stakeholder trust to enhance the credibility and market acceptance of ESG signals. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-08-10T16:06:52Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-08-10T16:06:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目次 iv 表次 v 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究動機與目標 1 第二節、研究問題與預期貢獻 2 第二章、文獻探討與研究假說 3 第一節、ESG績效與企業財務績效關係 3 第二節、信任作為非正式制度的關鍵作用與傳遞機制 4 第三節、企業規模與ESG訊號效果之差異 8 第三章、研究設計 9 第一節、樣本建構 9 第二節、變數定義與衡量 10 第三節、研究方法 16 第四章、實證結果與分析 19 第一節、敘述性統計 19 第二節、企業永續表現與財務績效之迴歸分析結果 20 第三節、信任機制分析 23 第四節、高污染產業異質性分析 30 第五節、穩健性分析 35 第五章、結論與建議 36 第一節、研究結論 36 第二節、制度環境對ESG、信任與財務績效關係之影響 38 第三節、研究限制與未來研究建議 40 參考文獻 42 附錄 46 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | ESG 表現 | - |
| dc.subject | 企業永續表現 | - |
| dc.subject | 企業信任 | - |
| dc.subject | 信任機制 | - |
| dc.subject | 財務績效 | - |
| dc.subject | ESG performance | - |
| dc.subject | corporate sustainability performance | - |
| dc.subject | corporate trust | - |
| dc.subject | trust mechanisms | - |
| dc.subject | financial performance | - |
| dc.title | ESG 表現、企業信任與財務績效 —以台灣上市公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | ESG Performance, Corporate Trust, and Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Firms in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡英哲;陳彥行 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ying-Che Tsai;Yan-Shing Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | ESG 表現; 企業永續表現; 企業信任; 信任機制; 財務績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | ESG performance; corporate sustainability performance; corporate trust; trust mechanisms; financial performance | en |
| dc.relation.page | 46 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202602839 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-08-03 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。