請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10294完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Shiuan Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃培軒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:17:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-02-09 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:17:45Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-02-09 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 牛君白（2006）。「家長式領導及其效能再探：一項情境故事法的分析」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
吳宗祐（2008）。由華人主管威權領導到員工工作滿意度與組織承諾：信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。「本土心理學研究」，30，3-63。 吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎（2002）。怒不可遏？或忍氣吞聲？華人企業中主管威權領導行為與部屬憤怒情緒反應的關係。「本土心理學研究」，19，3-49。 吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎 （2008）。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。「本土心理學研究」，30，65-115。 李茂能（2007）。「結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編制上之應用」。台北：心理出版社。 周麗芳、鄭伯壎、樊景立、任金剛（2004）。家長式領導：回顧與展望。「華人組織行為研究的方向與策略研討會宣讀論文」。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 周麗芳、鄭伯壎、樊景立、仁金剛、黃敏萍（2006）。見家長式領導。鄭伯壎、姜定宇（主編）：「華人組織行為：議題、作法及出版」，頁46-82。台北：華泰文化。 林柏穎（2008）。「多組織層級家長式領導效能之探討：以軍事組織為例」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 姜定宇、鄭伯壎、鄭紀瑩、周麗芳（2007）。華人效忠主管的概念分析與量表建構。「中華心理學刊」，49（4），351-363。 徐瑋伶（2003）。工作動機研究之回顧與前瞻。「應用心理研究」，19，89-113。 徐瑋伶、黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、樊景立（2006）。德行領導。見鄭伯壎、姜定宇（主編）：「華人組織行為：議題、作法及出版」，頁122-149。台北：華泰文化。 翁儷偵（1998）。評定量尺標示語之心理量尺值研究：頻率及同意度。「中華心理學刊」，40 ，1 期，73-86。 許金田、胡秀華、凌孝綦、鄭伯壎、周麗芳（2004）。家長式領導與組織公行為的關係：上下關係品質之中介效果。「交大管理學報」，24，119-149。 楊國樞（1993）。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦（主編）：「中國人的心理與社會行為─理念及方法篇」，頁87-142。台北：桂冠圖書公司。 楊國樞（1995）。家族化歷程、泛家族主義、及組織管理。「臺灣與大陸的企業文化及人力資源管理研討會論文集」。台北：信義文化基金會。 劉兆明（1992）。「工作動機理論發展與實徵研究」。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（計畫編號：NSC 80-0301-H030-06）。 劉安彥(1988)，社會心理學。台北：三民書局出版社 。 鄭伯壎（1995）。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」（台北），79 ，119-173 鄭伯壎、王安智（2009） 。「德行領導及其相關因素探討：一項文化整合研究策略」。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（計畫編號：NSC97-2410-H-002-156-SS3）。 鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立（2000）。家長式領導量表：三元模式的建構與測量。「本土心理學研究」，14，3-64。 鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清（2003）。家長式領導的三元模式：中國大陸企業組織的證據。「本土心理學研究」，19，209-250。 鄭伯壎、謝佩鴛、周麗芳（2002）。校長領導作風、上下關係品質及教師角色外行為：轉型式與家長式領導的效果。「本土心理學研究」，17，105-161。 謝貴枝、梁覺（1998）。領袖的德行：現代儒學中的一個起點。見鄭伯壎、黃國隆、郭建志（主編）：「海峽兩岸之組織與管理」，頁227-242。台北：遠流出版公司。 羅新興、陳忠虎、及陳秀清（2004）。領導者類型、追隨者類型與領導效能關係之研究-國軍組織成員為實證對象。「國防管理學報」，25，51-60。 Afza, M. (2005). Superior-Subordinate Relationships and Satisfaction in Indian Small Business Enterprises. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers , 30( 3), p11-19 Aronson, E.(2004). The social animal. New York : Worth Publishers. Bachman, J. G., Smith, C. B., & Slesinger, J. A. (1966). Control, performance and satisfaction: An analysis of structural and individual effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 127-136. Bagozzi, R., & Healtherton, T. (1994). A general approach to represting multifacetedpersonality constructs: Application to self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling,1, 35-67. Becker, T. E., Billing, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and basesof employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464–482. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84,740–756. Boster, F. J., Mitchell, M. M., Lapinski, M. K., Cooper, H., Orrego, V. O., Reinke, R. (1999). The impact of guilt and type of compliance-gaining message on compliance. Communication Monographs, 66(2),168 - 177 Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551–570. Cheng, B.S., Chou, L. F., Huang, M. P., Wu, T. Y., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalisticleadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chineseorganizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism andindependence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–109. Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., & Jen, C. K. (2005). The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence. Paper Presented at 2005 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Hawaii, U.S.A. Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. Cialdini, R. B, Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey, 2:151–92. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 4th ed. Cooper,D.J. (2003). Leadership for follower commitment. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Publications. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 18, 105–115. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–80). New York: Academic Press. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York:Plenum. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains, Canadian Psychology, 49, 14-23. Dillman, D. A., Tortora, R. D., Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for constructing web surveys: An initial statement. (Technical Report No. 98-50). Pullman, WA: Washington State University Social and Economic Sciences Research Center. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374-406. Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Emans BJM, Munduate L, Klaver E, van de Vliert E. (2003). Constructive consequences of leaders’ forcing influence styles. Applied Psychoogy : An International Review,52,36–54. Ettington, D. (1992). Successfully plateaued middle managers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Mitchigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizaitons. New York: Free Press. Farh, J. L. & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In A.S.Tsui & J.T.Li (Eds.), Management and organizations in China (pp.84-127). London: McMillam. Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444. Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees' reponses to paternalistic leadership in China. In A. S.Tsai, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng (Eds.), China's domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance, 230-260. New York: Sharpe. French, J.R.P. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In: D. Cartwright (ed.),Studies in Social Power, 150–167, Michigan, Institute of Social Research. Gagne´, M., & Koestner, R. (2002). Self-determination theory as a framework for understanding organizational commitment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–363. Gagne, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M. H., Aube, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation Evidence in Two Languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4),628-646 Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L.,Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis prentice. New Jersey: Hall Englewood Cliffs. Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., & Bell, M.P. (1998). Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1),96-107. Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in thestudy of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121. Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805. Ivancevich, J. M. (1970). An analysis of control, bases of control, and satisfaction in an organizational setting. Academy of Management Journal. 13, 427-436. Kelman, H. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78. Kline, J. B., Sulsky, L. M., & Rever-Moriyama, S. D. (2000). Common method varience and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 401-421. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons’ performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 123–150. Merton, R. K. (1959). 'Social conformity, deviation, and op- portunity-structures: a comment on the contributions of Dubin and Cloward.' American Sociological Review ,24, 177-189. Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., & Haddad, N. K. (1997). Client moti- vation for therapy scale: A measure of intrinsic motivation, ex- trinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 414-435. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S.. Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-53. Peng, T. K., Kao, Y. T., & Lin, C. C. (2006). Common Method Variance in Management Research: Its Nature, Effects, Detection, and Remedies, Journal of Management, 23 (1), 77-98. Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Boulian, P. V. (1974). “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609. Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. III. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey. Rahim, M.A. (1988). ‘The development of a leader power inventory’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 491–503. Rahim, M. A., & Afza, M. (1993). “Leader Power, Commitment, Satisfaction, Compliance, and Propensity to Leave a Job among US Accountants,” Journal of Social Psychology, 133(5), 611-625. Rahim, M. A., & Buntzman, G.F. (1989). ‘Supervisory power bases, styles of handling conflict with subordinates, and subordinate compliance and satisfaction’, The Journal of Psychology, 123, 195–210. Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In D. Steiner &M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371–382). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Reips, U. D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 243–256. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1-28. Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397-427. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames, & R. E. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu (pp. 13–51). New York: Academic Press. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are ‘personal’: comparing autonomous and controlling goals on effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557. Sheldon, K. M., Reis, H. T., & Ryan, R. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270-1279. Sherman, J. D. (1989). Technical supervision and turnover among engineers and technicians: influencing factors in the work environment. Group and Organization Studies, 14, 411–421. Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin,91,482-497. Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the Work locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335-340. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232. Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(3), 414-432. Student, K. R. (1968). Supervisory influence and workgroup performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 188-194. Tang, T. L. P., T. Sutarso, A. Akande, M. W. Allen, A. S. Alzubaidi, M. A. Ansari, F. Arias-Galicai, M. G. Borg, L. Canova, B. Charles-Pauvers, B. S. Cheng, R. K. Chiu, L. Z. Du, I. Garber, C. Garcia de la Torre, R. C. Higgs, A. H. S. Ibrahim, C. K. Jen, A. M. Kazem, K. Kim, V. K. G. Lim, R. Luna-Arocas, E. Malovics, A. M. Manganelli, A. Moreira, A. U. O. Nnedum, J. E. Osagie, A. Osman-Gani, F. C. Pereira, R. Pholsward, H. D. Pitariu, M. Polic, E. G. Sardz ˇoska, P. Skobic, A. F. Stembridge, T. L. N. Tang, T. S. H. Teo, M. Tombolani, M. Trontelj, C. Urbain and P. Vlerick: (2006), ‘The Love of Money and Pay Level Satisfaction: Measurement and Functional Equivalence in 29 Geopolitical Entities Around the World’, Management and Organization Review 2(3), 423–452. Thibodeaux, H. F. III, & Lowe, R. H. (1996). Convergence of leader-member exchange and mentoring: An investigation of social influence patterns. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 97-114. Tremblaya, M. A., Blancharda, C. M., Taylora,S., Pelletiera, L. G.& Villeneuveb, M.(2009) Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,41(4), 213-226. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). Areviewand synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 4-69. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley. Warren, D. I. (1968). ‘Power, visibility, and conformity in formal organizations’, American Sociological Review, 33, 951–970. Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 115–126. Yukl, Gary A. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10294 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 組織領導的研究指出部屬的順從是領導主要的目的與結果，部屬的順從是領導表現相當重要的指標。此外，部屬的順從在華人組織中一直有著重要的文化意涵，而華人領導中家長式領導是相當重要的研究典範，因此，本研究將著重於家長式領導與部屬順從之間的關係來做探討。從過去的研究可以發現，家長式領導與部屬順從的關係在理論與實徵研究上的不一致。回顧相關的文獻，家長式領導視部屬的順從為華人文化下一種合模的「行為表現」，而忽略了順從本身可能有著內在機制上的差異，此外，許多研究指出部屬的順從行為背後，可能有著動機上的差異，因此，本研究將從動機的觀點去區分不同類型的順從概念。基於順從類型區分之目的以及順從特性與外在動機的關聯性，本研究將採用著重於外在動機類型區分的自我決定論，當作順從概念區分的主要基礎。在區辨出不同的部屬順從概念後，本研究將進一步去探討家長式領導與不同部屬順從概念之間的關係，以釐清家長式領導與部屬順從在過去研究的不一致。所以，本研究有以下兩項目的：（1）借用自我決定論的動機觀點去區分不同的部屬順從類型。（2）檢驗家長式領導與不同類型的部屬順從之間的關係。從研究一的探索性因素分析、構念關係網以及信度的檢驗，發現部屬順從確實可以被區分成四種自主程度不同的類型。接著，研究二去驗證三種家長式領導與四種部屬順從之間的關係，由區段迴歸的分析，結果顯示三種家長式領導在四種部屬順從上確實呈現出不一樣的預測型態。透過本研究的探討，有助於家長式領導與部屬順從之間關係的釐清，並彌補過去研究的缺口。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:17:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97227123-1.pdf: 826571 bytes, checksum: 63ebbee9b4ba6f38831552a7f78e0f2f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第二章 研究一：順從概念的區分 5 第一節 文獻回顧 5 第二節 研究方法 23 第三節 研究結果 36 第三章 研究二：家長式領導與四種部屬順從關係之探討 41 第一節 文獻回顧 41 第二節 研究方法 58 第三節 研究結果 71 第四章 綜合討論與建議 83 第一節 結果討論 83 第二節 研究貢獻 85 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 88 參考文獻 93 附錄一 內容效度問卷 105 附錄二 研究一問卷 109 附錄三 研究二問卷 115 附錄四 哈門氏單因子檢定 121 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 家長式領導與不同的部屬順從類型：自我決定論的觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Paternalistic Leadership and Different Types of Subordinate’s Compliance: The Perspective of
Self-Determination Theory | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃敏萍,郭建志,胡昌亞 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自我決定論,部屬順從,自主,家長式領導, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | self-determination theory,subordinate’s compliance,autonomy,paternalistic leadership, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 121 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-01-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf | 807.2 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。