請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10286
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林奇秀(Chi-Shiou Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Fan Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳一帆 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:17:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-02-09 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:17:06Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-02-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 卜小蝶(2007)。社會性標記網站。在使用者導向之網路資源組織與檢索(頁57-83)。台北市:文華圖書館管理。
卜小蝶、張淇龍(2009)。社會性書籤網站之使用者與標籤特性初探。圖書資訊學研究,4(1),1-26。 江明修、陳欽春(2008)。充實社會資本之研究。在行政院經濟建設委員會編著,新世紀第二期國家建設計畫研擬專題研究系列iii(頁177-251)。臺北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。 吳明隆(2005)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計(第二版)。臺北市:知城數位科技。 吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用(第二版)。臺北市:五南。 吳萬益(2008)。企業研究方法(第三版)。臺北市:華泰。 李文益、黃毅志(2004)。文化資本、社會資本與學生成就的關聯性之研究─以台東師院為例。台東大學教育學報,15(2),23-58。 李威伸(2003)。文化資本與學業成就關係之研究─以台中市國中學生為例。未出版之碩士論文,東海大學教育研究所,台中市。 李政忠(2004)。網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議。資訊社會研究,6,1-24。 李銘薰、卜小蝶(2009)。電腦與數位3C專業虛擬社群知識分享之影響因素研究。教育資料與圖書館學,46(3),377-401。 李廣均(2004)。文化適應與象徵鬥爭─「名字�命名」的社會學分析。臺北市:學富文化。 周新富(2005)。布爾迪厄論學校教育與文化再製。臺北市:心理出版社。 朋尼維茲(P. Bonnewitz)(2002)。布赫迪厄社會學的第一課(Premieres lecons sur la sociologie de Pierre Bourdieu)(孫智綺譯)。臺北市:麥田出版;城邦文化發行。(原著出版年:2002) 林南(N. Lin)(2005)。社會資本(Social capital: A theory of social structure and action)(林祐聖、葉欣怡譯)。臺北市:弘智文化。(原著出版年:2001) 林信廷(2009)。Making community work:社會資本與社區參與相關性之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系,南投縣埔里鎮。 林建宏(2002)。社會階層與流行音樂消費關係研究。未出版之碩士論文,中國文化大學新聞研究所,台北市。 邱天助(2002)。布爾迪厄文化再製理論。臺北市:桂冠。 邱天助(2007)。國家意志下,人文社會學術生產的再反思:bourdieu場域分析的啟示。圖書資訊學研究,2(1),1-19。 邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。 張淳熙(2008)。從文化資本與社會資本探究東南亞裔新移民子女學業成就與自我效能之共變結構模式。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商學系,臺北市。 張淇龍(2007)。社會性書籤網站使用者之標記動機及標籤選擇因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所在職進修碩士班,臺北市。 陳怡靖(2009)。台灣地區公/私立幼稚園教職取得之研究:人力資本、文化資本、社會資本之檢驗。教育與社會研究,17,79-110。 陳青達(2005)。文化資本與學業成效關係之研究─以雲林縣國民小學六年級學生為例。未出版之碩士論文,中正大學教育研究所,嘉義縣民雄鄉。 陳偉棻(2008)。性別意識和線上交友自我形象的建構與認同─以PTT的Alltogether版為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學新聞研究所,臺北市。 斯沃茨(D. Swartz)(2006)。文化與權力:布爾迪厄的社會學(Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu)(陶東風譯)。上海:上海譯文。(原著出版年:1997) 程慧榮、黃國彬、孫坦(2009)。國外基於大眾標注系統的標籤研究。圖書情報工作,53(2),121-124、133。 黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式:理論與應用(第三版)。臺北市:五南。 楊雅婷(2006)。網路資源使用者之標記行為研究─以社會性書籤系統為例。未出版之碩士論文,世新大學資訊傳播學研究所,臺北市。 楊顓芙(2009)。Trends of the theory of planned behavior: Using co-citation analysis。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學經營管理研究所,新竹市。 廖淑婷(2007年12月20日)。Web 2.0發展現況與趨勢。上網日期:2010年6月04日。檢自:http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence/reports/pop_Docfull.asp?func=&sesd=80695795&docid=CDOC20071220002&cate=&querytext=&countrypno= 榮泰生(2007)。AMOS與研究方法。臺北市:五南。 鄭惠文(2009)。台灣大學生社會資本與成就動機之相關研究─以淡江大學為例。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所,臺北縣淡水鎮。 鄭豪志(2008)。成人文化資本、社會資本及後設認知能力與其自我導向學習傾向關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文,中正大學成人及繼續教育學系,嘉義縣民雄鄉。 賴彥如(2006)。解讀、觀展�表演與文化資本:探討「台灣龍捲風」網路社群的差異。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學新聞研究所,台北市。 謝旭洲(2008)。社會統計與資料分析。臺北縣深坑鄉:威仕曼文化。 龎惠潔(2005)。美麗人生:網路相簿社群的互動行為研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學新聞研究所,臺北市。 竇玉萌、趙丹群(2009)。協作標注系統研究綜述。現代圖書情報技術,175,9-17。 Bourdieu, P.、Wacquant, L. J. D.(2004)。實踐與反思:反思社會學導引(An invitation to reflexive sociology)(李猛、李康譯)。北京市:中央編譯。(原著出版年:1992) Hills, M.(2005)。在社群與層級之間的迷文化(朱華瑄譯)。在迷文化(Fan cultures)(頁79-110)。臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化。(原著出版年:2002) May, C.(2004)。質疑資訊社會(The information society: A sceptical view)(葉欣怡譯)。臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化。(原著出版年:2002) Ruane, J. M.(2007)。研究方法概論(Essentials of research methods: A guide to social research)(王修曉譯)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2005) Angus, E., Thelwall, M., & Stuart, D. (2008). General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr. Online Information Review, 32(1), 89-101. Baym, N. K. (1998). The emergence of on-line community. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 35-65). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. Berman, S. (1971). Prejudices and antipathies: A tract on the LC subject heads concerning people. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25. Chen, I. Y. L. (2007). The factors influencing members' continuance intentions in professional virtual communities: A longitudinal study. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 451-467. Cheong, P. H., & Poon, Jessie. (2008). WWW.FAITH.ORG: (Re)structuring communication and the social capital of religious organizations. Information, Communication & Society, 11(1), 89-110. Chi, E. H., & Mytkowicz, T. (2008). Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. Chi, L., Chan, W. K., Seow, G., & Tam, K. (2009). Transplanting social capital to the online world: Insights from two experimental studies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 19(3), 214-236. Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888. Chopin, K. (2008). Finding communities: Alternative viewpoints through weblogs and tagging. Journal of Documentation, 64(4), 552-575. Chou, S.-W., & Chang, Y.-C. (2008). An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Creation in Electronic Networks of Practice: Social Capital and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual. Christensen, B. (2008). Minoritization vs. Universalization: Lesbianism and Male Homosexuality in LCSH and LCC. Knowledge organization, 35(4), 229-238. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), S95-S120. Delicious (2010, May 24). Wikipedia. Retrieved June 3, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delicious_(website) Ding, Y., Jacob, E. K., Caverlee, J., Fried, M., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Profiling social networks: A social tagging perspective. D-Lib Magazine, 15(3/4), Retrieved June 7, 2010, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march09/ding/03ding.html Farrell, S., Lau, T., & Nusser, S. (2007). Building communities with people-tags. In C. Baranauskas, P. Palanque, J. Abascal & S. D. J. Barbosa (Eds.), Human-computer interaction - INTERACT 2007 (pp. 357-360). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. Foulonneau, M., & Riley, J. (2008). What is metadata? Metadata for Digital Resources: Implementation, Systems Design and Interoperability (pp. 3-10). Oxford: Chandos. Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208. Guy, M., & Tonkin, E. (2006). Folksonomies: Tidying up tags?. D-Lib Magazine, 12(1), Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 1962) Halpin, H., Robu, V., & Shepherd, H. (2007). The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., & Scott, J. (2005). Social bookmarking tools (I): A general review. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html Heckner, M., Muhlbacher, S., & Wolff, C. (2008). Tagging tagging. Analysing user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems. Journal of Digital Information, 9(2), Retrieved June 4, 2010, from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/download/246/208 Heymann, P., Koutrika, G., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2008). Can social bookmarking improve web search? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining. Hood, S. (2008, Nov. 6). Delicious is 5!. Wikipedia. Retrieved June 3, 2010, from http://blog.delicious.com/blog/2008/11/delicious-is-5.html Hufford, J. R. (1991). Use studies and OPACs. Technical Services Quarterly, 9(1), 57-70. Jacob, E. K. (2004). Classification and categorization: A difference that makes difference. Library Trends, 52(3), 515-540. Jiang, H., & Carroll, J. M. (2009). Social capital, social network and identity bonds: a reconceptualization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies. Johnson, C. A. (2007). Social capital and the search for information: Examining the role of social capital in information seeking behavior in Mongolia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 883-894. Kenny, D. A. (2009). Mediation. Retrieved December 8, 2010, from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm Kipp, M. E. I., & Campbell, D. G. (2006). Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. Paper presented at the Proceedings Annual General Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: collective use of the internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9(5), 582-611. Lawton, P. (2005). Capital and stratification within virtual community: A case study of Metafilter.com. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alta., Canada. Lozar Manfreda, K., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Internet surveys. In E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox & D. A. Dillman (Eds.), International handbook of survey methodology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Li, X., Guo, L., & Zhao, Y. E. (2008). Tag-based social interest discovery. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. Macgregor, G., & McCulloch, E. (2006). Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review, 55(5), 291-300. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Doyd, D., & Davis, M. (2006). Position paper, tagging, taxonomy, Flickr, article, toread. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web. Marvasti, A. F. (2008). Social structure in tagging practices: Reality or myth? , Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Mathes, A. (2004, December). Folksonomies - cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. Retrieved March 9, 2009, from http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html Mathwick, C., Wiertz, C., & de Ruyter, K. (2008). Social capital production in a virtual P3 community. Journal of Consumer Reasearch, 34(6), 832-849. Mesnage, C., & Jazayeri, M. (2006). Specifying the Collaborative Tagging System. Paper presented at the Semantic Authoring and Annotation Workshop, 2006. Mika, P. (2007). Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Web Semantics, 5(1), 5-15. Moulaison, H. L. (2008). Social tagging in the Web 2.0 Environment: Author vs. User tagging. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(2), 101-111. Munk, T. B., & Mork, K. (2007a). Folksonomy, the power law & the significance of the least effort. Knowledge Organization, 34(1), 16-33. Munk, T. B., & Mork, K. (2007b). Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies - an empirical study. Knowledge Organization, 34(3), 115-127. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Different roles, different strokes: Organizing virtual customer environments to promote two types of customer contributions. Organization Science, 21(2), 554-572. Olson, H. A. (2000). Difference, culture and change: The untapped potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1/2), 53-71. Olson, H. A. (2001). The power to name: Representation in library catalogs. Sign: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26(3), 639-668. Olson, H. A. (2007). How we construct subjects: A feminist analysis. Library Trends, 56(2), 509-541. O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65(1), 17-37. Peterson, E. (2006). Beneath the metadata: some philosophical problems with folksonomy. D-Lib Magazine, 12(11), Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ november06/peterson/11peterson.html Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-683. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American. New York: Simon & Schuster. Raban, D. R. (2008). The incentive structure in an online information market. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(14), 2284-95. Recuero, R. d. C. (2008). Information flows and social capital in weblogs: a case study in the Brazilian blogosphere. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. Rivadeneira, A. W., Gruen, D. M., Muller, M. J., & Millen, D. R. (2007). Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Santos-Neto, E., Ripeanu, M., & Iamnitchi, A. (2007). Tracking user attention in collaborative tagging communities. Paper presented at the Workshop on contextualized attention metadata. Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., et al. (2006). tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. Smith, G. (2008). Tagging: people-powered metadata for the social web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Soroka, V., & Rafaeli, S. (2006). Invisible participants: how cultural capital relates to lurking behavior. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web. Spiteri, L. F. (2007). The structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(3), 13-25. Vanderlei, T. A., Durao, F. A., Martins, A. C., Garcia, V. C., Almeida, E. S., & Meira, S. R. d. L. (2007). A cooperative classification mechanism for search and retrieval software components. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing. Wang, J.-C., & Chiang, M.-J. (2009). Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective. Decision Support Systems, 47(4), 466-476. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57. Wiertz, C., & de Ruyter, K. (2007). Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 347-376. Zollers, A. (2007). Emerging motivations for tagging: Expression, performance, and activism. Paper presented at the 16th International World Wide Web Conference. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10286 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 社會性標記是近年廣為應用且備受矚目的web 2.0網路服務形態之一。網路樂觀論者認為社會性標記系統提供了平等自由的標記環境,讓每個使用者都可透過標記行為發聲,共同參與社群語義的建構。然而諸多社會性標記系統與標籤使用的實證研究,卻發現無論是標籤使用次數、資源收錄頻率、或使用者活躍程度,皆存在顯著的差異,差異的成因便成了值得研究的議題。本研究故採文化資本與社會資本為分析取徑,並分為線下與線上形態,探討使用者線下�線上文化資本及社會資本與社會性標記行為的關係。
本研究採理論驗證性量化分析,以網路書籤標記平台Delicious網站的使用者為研究對象,利用網路問卷蒐集使用者的線下�線上文化資本與社會資本擁有狀況,以及標記行為方面的資訊(含個人導向標記動機、社會導向標記動機、標記策略運用、及標記模仿等四部份),藉以分析各類型資本之間的關係與各類型資本對社會性標記行為的影響。 研究發現Delicious使用者同類型資本的線下與線上形態之間,粗具結構同形關係,然而僅線下文化資本與線上文化資本間的結構同形較為明顯;不同類型資本的線下與線上形態之間則略可交叉兌換,但線下資本對線上資本狀況的解釋力並不佳。其次,在各類型資本對社會性標記行為的影響方面,本研究發現Delicious使用者的線下�線上文化資本及線下社會資本對個人導向標記動機具有正向影響;線下�線上社會資本對社會導向標記動機具正向影響;線下�線上文化及社會資本均對標記策略運用有正向影響;線下�線上社會資本則對標記模仿具正向影響。根據以上研究結果,本研究推論社會性標記系統中的權力結構為:個人的線下及線上文化資本應會影響其對集體標籤集合的貢獻度,線上社會資本則可能影響社群語義建構的涉入度,貢獻度及涉入度則又形塑個人在社群語義建構中扮演的主導�追隨角色,據此各類型資本可能影響使用者間的標記權力關係。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Social tagging is a recent popular Web 2.0 application. Some technology optimists have claimed that social tagging ushered in a free tagging environment which allows every user an equal opportunity to articulate his/her thoughts and join the construction of common semantics. However, empirical studies of social bookmarking systems and tag usages indicated that the variations existed among users in the frequencies of URL bookmarking, tag uses, and activeness in tagging. These suggest that participation in the construction of social tags and the common semantics behind them may not have been as equal as suggested. The behavioral differences in tagging thus become a topic worthy of studying. This study explored users’ social tagging behavior from the perspectives of cultural capital and social capital, which were derived from the sociologist, Pierre Bourdieu, and other theorists’ analytic frameworks. To examine the impact of cultural and social capitals on tagging behavior, this study examined their workings in offline and online forms.
Adopting a quantitative approach, this study surveyed the users of Delicious.com, a well-known social bookmarking website. Online questionnaire was used to assess users’ possession of offline and online cultural capital and social capital and their tendencies of social tagging including their motivations in self-oriented tagging and social-oriented tagging, level of strategic tagging and the level of tagging imitation. Inferential statistical procedures were used to examine the complex relationships between the offline and online cultural and social capitals as well as the impact of various forms of social/cultural capitals on the tagging behavior. The study results revealed two major findings. First, homological relationships existed between the offline and online forms of the two types of capital, particularly in cultural capital. Exchangeable relationships could also be observed between the two types of capital’s offline and online forms. Second, Delicious users’ offline/online cultural capital and offline social capital affected the behavior of self-oriented tagging; offline/online social capital affected social-oriented tagging; offline/online cultural capital and offline/online social capital both affected tagging strategies usage; offline/online social capital affected the behavior of tagging imitation. The findings suggest that the offline/online cultural capital may affect one’s contribution of new tags into the entirety of social tags, and online social capital may affect one’s participation in the construction of common semantics. User roles may be characterized by the degree of tag contribution and participation, which resulted in the distinctions of leaders and followers. It may shed lights on the observations of the power relationships among tag users and the common semantic construction. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:17:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R96126005-1.pdf: 1022458 bytes, checksum: 59b5ae8f11df23981543764fb92be140 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的、架構與假設………………………………………7 第三節 研究範圍與限制………………………………………9 第四節 名詞解釋………………………………………9 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………13 第一節 標籤、標記與社會性標記系統………………………………………13 第二節 資本理論與網路研究………………………………………32 第三節 文化資本概念與研究構面………………………………………39 第四節 社會資本概念與研究構面………………………………………47 第五節 本研究之理論架構………………………………………55 第三章 研究方法與設計………………………………………69 第一節 研究設計………………………………………69 第二節 問卷設計………………………………………73 第三節 問卷實施與資料處理………………………………………88 第四章 研究結果與討論………………………………………101 第一節 研究樣本概述………………………………………101 第二節 線下文化�社會資本對線上文化�社會資本的影響………………………………………113 第三節 線下與線上文化資本及社會資本對社會性標記行為的影響………………………………………122 第四節 再論社會性標記系統的權力結構………………………………………144 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………153 第一節 主要研究發現………………………………………153 第二節 研究建議………………………………………158 參考文獻………………………………………163 附錄:研究問卷………………………………………175 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 從線下與線上文化資本及社會資本觀點探索社會性標記行為 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring Social Tagging Behavior from the Perspectives of Online and Offline Cultural Capital and Social Capital | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃慕萱(Mu-hsuan Huang),藍文欽(Wen-Chin Lan),林維真(Wei-Jane Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 社會性標記行為,文化資本,社會資本, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Social Tagging Behavior,Cultural Capital,Social Capital, | en |
dc.relation.page | 180 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-01-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf | 998.49 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。