請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102543完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 戚樹誠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shu-Cheng Chi | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝東昇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Tung-Sheng Hsieh | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-08T16:31:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-07-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-06-29 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
叢均如（2014）。癌症病人的心理困擾。癌症新探，67。http://web.tccf.org.tw/lifetype/index.php?op=Default&blogId=1&Date=201401&&page=2 衛生福利部國民健康署癌症防治組（2025年2月4日）。結合世界癌症日提供癌友全方位癌症照護。衛生福利部國民健康署新聞稿。https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=4878&pid=18801 沈莉馨（2024年9月21日）。17癌年輕化！9癌老年人比例降 年輕人反升。自由時報。https://health.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/4803150 吳詠霓（2024年5月23日）。全球癌症年輕化！研究揭每天多喝1杯「這類飲料」罹癌率增30%以上 7大致癌因子曝。健康2.0。https://health.tvbs.com.tw/cancer/347096 田孟心（2024年3月26日）。為什麼全球愈來愈多年輕人罹癌？康健。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5134620 張維宏（2025年1月15日）。癌後想回歸職場又怕撐不住、留在原公司比較好 嗎？4個建議幫助抉擇。癌症問康健。https://cancer.commonhealth.com.tw/article/1464 英文文獻 Alfano, C. M., & Rowland, J. H. (2006). Recovery issues in cancer survivorship: A new challenge for supportive care. The Cancer Journal, 12(5), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200609000-00012 Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992). Does self–other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00848.x Attridge, M. (2019). A global perspective on promoting workplace mental health and the role of employee assistance programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(4), 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117119838101c Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260 Bower, J. E. (2014). Cancer-related fatigue—Mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 11(10), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.127 Cancer Research UK. (2021). Cancer statistics for the UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics-for-the-uk Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165 Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304 De Boer, A. G. E. M., Taskila, T., Ojajärvi, A., Van Dijk, F. J. H., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M. (2009). Cancer survivors and unemployment: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA, 301(7), 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.187 Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6 Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 Feuerstein, M., Todd, B. L., Moskowitz, M. C., Bruns, G. L., Stoler, M. R., Nassif, T., & Yu, X. (2010). Work in cancer survivors: A model for practice and research. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 4(4), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0154-6 Fleenor, J. W., Smither, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Braddy, P. W., & Sturm, R. E. (2010). Self–other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1005–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.006 Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524 Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. Greidanus, M. A., de Boer, A. G. E. M., Tiedtke, C. M., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., de Rijk, A. E., & Tamminga, S. J. (2020). Supporting employers to enhance the return to work of cancer survivors: Development of a web-based intervention (MiLES intervention). Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 14(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00844-z Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.93 Hewitt, M., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E. (Eds.). (2006). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11468 Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055 Johnston, D. W., Johnston, M., Pollard, B., Kinmonth, A. L., & Mant, D. (2004). Motivation is not enough: Prediction of risk behavior following diagnosis of coronary heart disease from the theory of planned behavior. Health Psychology, 23(5), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.533 Joyce, S., Modini, M., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., Bryant, R., Mitchell, P. B., & Harvey, S. B. (2016). Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: A systematic meta-review. Psychological Medicine, 46(4), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715002408 Kooij, D. T. A. M., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306 Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554 Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0536 Lev, E. L., Paul, D., & Owen, S. V. (1999). Age, self-efficacy, and change in patients’ adjustment to cancer. Cancer Practice, 7(4), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.74004.x Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTS.0000014671.27856.7e Lorig, K. R., Ritter, P., Stewart, A. L., Sobel, D. S., Brown, B. W., Albert Bandura, Gonzalez, V. M., Laurent, D. D., & Holman, H. R. (2001). Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Medical Care, 39(11), 1217–1223. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008 Lovelace, D. L., McDaniel, L. R., & Golden, D. (2019). Long-term effects of breast cancer surgery, treatment, and survivor care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 64(6), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13012 Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164 Maitlis, S. (2020). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 325–361. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993111 Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227 Mehnert, A. (2011). Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 77(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.01.004 Menger, F., Mohammed Halim, N. A., Rimmer, B., & Sharp, L. (2021). Post-traumatic growth after cancer: A scoping review of qualitative research. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29(11), 7013–7027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06253-2 Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732 Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301 Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786060 Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 Rutt, J. L., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2016). From past to future. Psychology and Aging, 31(6), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000090 Schmitt, A., Zacher, H., & de Lange, A. H. (2013). Focus on opportunities as a boundary condition of the relationship between age and work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(7), 1020–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.698055 Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701396641 Seifart, U., & Schmielau, J. (2017). Return to work of cancer survivors. Oncology Research and Treatment, 40(12), 760–763. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485079 Seiler, A., & Jenewein, J. (2019). Resilience in cancer patients. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208 Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5 Southwick, S. M., Bonanno, G. A., Masten, A. S., Panter-Brick, C., & Yehuda, R. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), 25338. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338 Spelten, E. R., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M. (2002). Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: A literature review. Psycho-Oncology, 11(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.585 Syse, A., Tretli, S., & Kravdal, Ø. (2008). Cancer’s impact on employment and earnings—A population-based study from Norway. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-008-0053-2 Tavan, H., Azadi, A., & Veisani, Y. (2019). Return to work in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 25(1), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_114_18 Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01 Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 1–11. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC89228 Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011 Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015425 Zacher, H. (2013). Older job seekers’ job search intensity: The interplay of proactive personality, age and occupational future time perspective. Ageing & Society, 33(7), 1139–1166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000451 Zacher, H., & Yang, J. (2016). Organizational climate for successful aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01007 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102543 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討癌症生存者於重返職場後，如何重構其工作身份與職場行為，並在身心限制與不確定性下，追求可持續的工作與生活模式。研究以創傷後成長（Posttraumatic Growth, PTG）理論為基礎，並結合正向逆境（positive adversity）之視角，探討癌症生存者如何重新詮釋工作意義、調整角色認知，以及透過工作塑造（job crafting）與主動行為進行職場適應。
本研究採質性研究方法，透過訪談蒐集 12 位受訪者之資料，包括 6 位癌症生存者與 6 位同事，其中包含 2 組生存者－同事配對個案，以進行雙視角分析。研究透過主題分析與跨個案比較，探討癌症生存者於創傷後成長、自我效能、時間觀、社會與機構支持，以及工作身份與職場行為重構等面向之轉化歷程。 研究發現指出，癌症生存者之重返職場並非單純的恢復歷程，而是一種動態的工作身份與生活價值重建歷程。其創傷後成長主要展現在價值排序與時間觀的轉變，而非工作投入的持續擴張。生存者對工作能力的認知，亦由追求績效與角色擴張，逐步轉向功能穩定、身心平衡與可持續工作參與。在職場行為上，其主動性更多呈現為策略性與可持續性的工作調整，而非傳統以績效導向為主的擴張型主動行為。此外，研究亦發現，社會支持與組織支持對癌症生存者之自我效能維持、心理安全感與長期工作參與具有重要影響。 本研究進一步指出，癌症生存者之職場適應，不應僅被理解為功能恢復或回到疾病前狀態，而是個體在限制與不確定性中，透過意義重構、資源重新配置與工作調整，逐步建立可持續工作模式的歷程。本研究除補充癌症生存者重返職場相關文獻外，亦對組織支持、健康職場建構與可持續工作管理提供實務意涵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study explores how cancer survivors reconstruct their work identity and workplace behaviors after returning to work under conditions of limitation and uncertainty. Drawing on posttraumatic growth (PTG) theory and the perspective of positive adversity, the study examines how survivors reinterpret the meaning of work and adapt through job crafting and proactive behaviors.
Using a qualitative research design, this study conducted interviews with 12 participants, including six cancer survivors and six colleagues, with two matched survivor–colleague dyads for dual-perspective analysis. Through thematic analysis and cross-case comparisons, the study investigates processes related to posttraumatic growth, self-efficacy, and work identity reconstruction. The findings suggest that returning to work is not merely a recovery process, but a dynamic process of reconstructing work identity and life values. Survivors gradually shift from pursuing performance and role expansion toward maintaining functional stability, work–life balance, and sustainable work participation. Their proactive behaviors are more likely to appear as sustainability-oriented work adjustments. Social and organizational support also play important roles in sustaining survivors’ self-efficacy and long-term work participation. This study contributes to the literature on cancer survivors’ return to work, while providing practical implications for sustainable work management. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-07-08T16:31:22Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-07-08T16:31:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審訂書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目次 v 圖次 ix 表次 x 第一章緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究架構與流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 研究系絡：癌症生存者重返職場 5 第二節 創傷後成長：從心理歷程到行為實踐 7 第三節 自我效能：癌症生存者對自我能力的信念 9 第四節 時間觀：癌症生存者如何看待未來 12 第五節 社會與機構支持：癌症生存者獲得的支持 14 第六節 癌症生存者工作身份與職場行為的重構 17 一、癌症生存者工作身份的重構 17 二、癌症生存者職場行為的重構 18 第七節 小結 19 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 研究設計 22 一、研究取向 22 二、命題發展 23 三、資料分析方法之說明 24 四、生存者-同事之雙視角配對設計 24 第二節 訪談 24 一、訪談大綱 24 二、訪談對象 25 第三節 訪談實施 27 一、訪談對象邀約 27 二、訪談研究目的和大綱說明 27 三、訪談人數和期間 27 第四節 編碼 27 第五節 研究者反思 29 一、研究者位置可能帶來之影響與偏誤風險 30 二、反思素材之使用方式與界線聲明 31 三、偏誤控制與研究嚴謹性強化策略 31 四、小結 32 第四章 資料分析 33 第一節 配對分析（Dyadic Analysis） 33 一、S1 vs. C1分析 33 二、S2 vs. C2分析 59 三、S1/C1與 S2/C2的配對分析總結 83 第二節 非配對個案分析：癌症生存者 85 一、S3 85 二、S4 93 三、S5 109 四、S6 120 五、非配對癌症生存者分析總結 127 第三節 非配對個案分析：生存者同事 130 一、C3 130 二、C4 134 三、C5 139 四、C6 145 五、非配對生存者同事分析總結 152 第四節 分析發現與研究命題建構之銜接 154 第五章 結論與建議 155 第一節研究命題之提出 155 一、研究命題一 156 二、研究命題二 158 三、研究命題三 160 四、研究命題四 162 五、研究命題五 165 六、本研究的命題定位與限制 167 七、從未來建議看生存者之反思與倡議 169 第二節 實務意涵 169 一、組織層次 170 二、主管層次 170 三、同事層次 171 四、生存者層次 171 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 172 一、研究方法之限制與未來方向 172 二、樣本與情境範圍之限制 172 三、疾病類型與治療階段的異質性 173 四、角色視角之取樣限制 173 第四節 結論與建議 173 參考文獻 175 附錄一、癌症生存者訪談大綱 184 附錄二、生存者同事訪談大綱 187 附錄三、研究者反思：訪談 189 附錄四、研究者倫理 208 一、告知與同意 208 二、保密原則 208 三、尊重與傾聽 208 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 癌症生存者 | - |
| dc.subject | 重返職場 | - |
| dc.subject | 工作身份重構 | - |
| dc.subject | 創傷後成長 | - |
| dc.subject | 工作塑造 | - |
| dc.subject | Cancer Survivors | - |
| dc.subject | Return to Work | - |
| dc.subject | Work Identity Reconstruction | - |
| dc.subject | Posttraumatic Growth | - |
| dc.subject | Job Crafting | - |
| dc.title | 癌症生存者工作身份與職場行為的重建構：一項質性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Cancer Survivors’ Reconstruction of Work Identity and Workplace Behavior: A Qualitative Investigation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃家齊;許碧芬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jia-Chi Huang;Bi-Fen Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 癌症生存者; 重返職場; 工作身份重構; 創傷後成長; 工作塑造 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Cancer Survivors; Return to Work; Work Identity Reconstruction; Posttraumatic Growth; Job Crafting | en |
| dc.relation.page | 208 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202601488 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-06-29 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 進修推廣學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物科技管理碩士在職學位學程 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-07-09 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物科技管理碩士在職學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-2.pdf | 1.9 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。