請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102401完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 廖國偉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kuo-Wei Liao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賴品傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Pin-Chieh Lai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-16T16:27:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-17 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-06-16 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-03-24 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Acharya, U., Lal, R., & Chandra, R. (2022). Data driven approach on in-situ soil carbon measurement. Carbon Management, 13(1), 401-419.
2. Ahmed, S., Griffin, T. S., Kraner, D., Schaffner, M. K., Sharma, D., Hazel, M., ... & Cash, S. B. (2019). Environmental factors variably impact tea secondary metabolites in the context of climate change. Frontiers in plant science, 10, 939. 3. Antille, D. L., Chamen, W. C., Tullberg, J. N., & Lal, R. (2015). The potential of controlled traffic farming to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon sequestration in arable land: a critical review. Transactions of the ASABE, 58(3), 707-731. 4. Ackerson, J. P. (2018). Soil sampling guidelines. Purdue University, Purdue Extension: Lafayette, IN, USA. 5. Change, I. P. O. C. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for global environmental strategies, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan. 6. Chen, C. L. 陳琦玲 (2022). Emission reduction and carbon sink enhancement technologies in the agricultural sector 農業部門減排與增匯技術. Taichung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station Special Publication 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 48–51. 7. Chen, C. P., Juang, K. W., Cheng, C. H., & Pai, C. W. (2016). Effects of adjacent land-use types on the distribution of soil organic carbon stocks in the montane area of central Taiwan. Botanical Studies, 57(1), 32. 8. Chen, T. H. 陳財輝, & Lin, H. C. 林鴻志 (2023). A case study on carbon sink estimation of Dendrocalamus latiflorus forest in Taiwan 臺灣桂竹林碳匯量推估之案例. Taiwan Forestry Research Bulletin 林業研究專訊, 30(5), 19–23. 9. Dotaniya, M. L., Meena, V. D., Saha, J. K., Rajendiran, S., Patra, A. K., Dotaniya, C. K., ... & Meena, B. P. (2019). Environmental impact measurements: tool and techniques. In Handbook of ecomaterials (pp. 33-62). Springer, Cham. 10. Entry, J. A., Sojka, R. E., & Shewmaker, G. E. (2002). Management of irrigated agriculture to increase organic carbon storage in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66(6), 1957-1964. 11. Hajra, N. G., & Kumar, R. (1999). Seasonal variation in photosynthesis and productivity of young tea. Experimental Agriculture, 35(1), 71-85. 12. Guo, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023). Carbon reduction effect of agricultural green production technology: A new evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 874, 162483. 13. Hall, M. K., Winters, A. J., & Rogers, G. S. (2014). Variations in the diurnal flux of greenhouse gases from soil and optimizing the sampling protocol for closed static chambers. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 45(22), 2970-2978. 14. Han, Z., Lin, H., Xu, P., Li, Z., Wang, J., & Zou, J. (2022). Impact of organic fertilizer substitution and biochar amendment on net greenhouse gas budget in a tea plantation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 326, 107779. 15. Hermann, D., Sauthoff, S., & Mußhoff, O. (2017). Ex-ante evaluation of policy measures to enhance carbon sequestration in agricultural soils. Ecological Economics, 140, 241-250. 16. Huisingh, D., Zhang, Z., Moore, J. C., Qiao, Q., & Li, Q. (2015). Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. Journal of cleaner production, 103, 1-12. 17. Juang, K. W., & Chen, C. P. (2023). Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in organic farming practice and abandoned tea plantation. Botanical Studies, 64(1), 28. 18. Kaiser, E., Morales, A., Harbinson, J., Kromdijk, J., Heuvelink, E., & Marcelis, L. F. (2015). Dynamic photosynthesis in different environmental conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(9), 2415-2426. 19. Lal, R., Negassa, W., & Lorenz, K. (2015). Carbon sequestration in soil. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 15, 79-86. 20. Li, S., Wu, X. U., Xue, H., Gu, B., Cheng, H., Zeng, J., ... & Chang, J. (2011). Quantifying carbon storage for tea plantations in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 141(3–4), 390–398. 21. Liao, C.C. 廖瑾郡 (2012). Carbon sequestration of wetland plants in the Hsiangshan Wetland 新竹香山濕地植物之碳吸存量 (Master’s thesis, National Chung Hsing University). National Chung Hsing University. 22. Lin, Y. S., Medlyn, B. E., & Ellsworth, D. S. (2012). Temperature responses of leaf net photosynthesis: the role of component processes. Tree physiology, 32(2), 219-231. 23. Lin, C. Y. 林家穎 (2023). Carbon stocks and carbon budgets in low elevation tea gardens in Mingjian, Taiwan 臺灣名間低海拔茶園的碳儲量及碳收支 (Master’s thesis, National Chung Hsing University). National Chung Hsing University. 24. Lin, C. Y. 林昭吟 (2023). Taiwan’s strategic plan for promoting natural carbon sinks 我國自然碳匯推動規劃. Taiwan Economic Forum 台灣經濟論衡, 21(1), 40–46. 25. Liu, Y., Liu, H., Xu, W., Wang, L., Wang, Q., Ou, G., ... & Hong, Z. (2024). Advances and challenges of carbon storage estimation in tea plantation. Ecological Informatics, 81, 102616. 26. Ma, J., McHugh, T., & Eklund, B. (2020). Flux chamber measurements should play a more important role in contaminated site management. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(19), 11645-11647. 27. Maia, S. M. F., de Souza Medeiros, A., dos Santos, T. C., Lyra, G. B., Lal, R., Assad, E. D., & Cerri, C. E. P. (2022). Potential of no-till agriculture as a nature-based solution for climate-change mitigation in Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research, 220, 105368. 28. Mancuso, G., Lavrnić, S., Canet-Martí, A., Zaheer, A., Avolio, F., Langergraber, G., & Toscano, A. (2023). Performance of lagoon and constructed wetland systems for tertiary wastewater treatment and potential of reclaimed water in agricultural irrigation. Journal of Environmental Management, 348, 119278. 29. Matteau, J. P., Célicourt, P., Létourneau, G., Gumiere, T., Walter, C., & Gumiere, S. J. (2021). Association between irrigation thresholds and promotion of soil organic carbon decomposition in sandy soil. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 6733. 30. Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., Angers, D. A., Arrouays, D., Chambers, A., ... & Winowiecki, L. (2017). Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma, 292, 59-86. 31. Oertel, C., Matschullat, J., Zurba, K., Zimmermann, F., & Erasmi, S. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review. Geochemistry, 76(3), 327-352. 32. Pang, J., Li, H., Tang, X., & Geng, J. (2019). Carbon dynamics and environmental controls of a hilly tea plantation in Southeast China. Ecology and Evolution, 9(17), 9723-9735. 33. Paustian, K., Collier, S., Baldock, J., Burgess, R., Creque, J., DeLonge, M., ... & Jahn, M. (2019). Quantifying carbon for agricultural soil management: from the current status toward a global soil information system. Carbon Management, 10(6), 567-587. 34. Pereira, L. S., Oweis, T., & Zairi, A. (2002). Irrigation management under water scarcity. Agricultural water management, 57(3), 175-206. 35. Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000). Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential. Global change biology, 6(3), 317-327. 36. Regenerative Organic Alliance. (2020). ROC soil sampling guidelines. https://regenorganic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ROC-Soil-Sampling-Guidelines.pdf 37. Reyes, S. R. C., Miyazaki, A., Yiu, E., & Saito, O. (2020). Enhancing sustainability in traditional agriculture: Indicators for monitoring the conservation of globally important agricultural heritage systems (GIAHS) in Japan. Sustainability, 12(14), 5656. 38. Rochette, P., & Eriksen-Hamel, N. S. (2008). Chamber measurements of soil nitrous oxide flux: are absolute values reliable?. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72(2), 331-342. 39. Shiau, Y. J., Burchell, M. R., Krauss, K. W., Broome, S. W., & Birgand, F. (2019). Carbon storage potential in a recently created brackish marsh in eastern North Carolina, USA. Ecological Engineering, 127, 579-588. 40. Shrestha, B. M., Chang, S. X., Bork, E. W., & Carlyle, C. N. (2018). Enrichment planting and soil amendments enhance carbon sequestration and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in agroforestry systems: a review. Forests, 9(6), 369. 41. SIVALINGAM, N. (2022). The Effect of different agronomic management practices to increase carbon sequestration in rice based cropping system: A little review. Research on Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 3(1), 1-4. 42. Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Raes, D., & Fereres, E. (2009). AquaCrop—The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agronomy journal, 101(3), 426-437. 43. Tiefenbacher, A., Sandén, T., Haslmayr, H. P., Miloczki, J., Wenzel, W., & Spiegel, H. (2021). Optimizing carbon sequestration in croplands: A synthesis. Agronomy, 11(5), 882. 44. Uri, N. D. (2001). Conservation practices in US agriculture and their impact on carbon sequestration. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 70(3), 323-344. 45. Wu, H., Deng, K., Dong, Z., Meng, X., Zhang, L., Jiang, S., ... & Xu, Y. (2022). Comprehensive assessment of land use carbon emissions of a coal resource-based city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134706. 46. Xia, W., Li, C., Nie, J., Shao, S., Rogers, K. M., Zhang, Y., ... & Yuan, Y. (2022). Stable isotope and photosynthetic response of tea grown under different temperature and light conditions. Food Chemistry, 368, 130771. 47. Yang, H., Wang, X., & Bin, P. (2022). Agriculture carbon-emission reduction and changing factors behind agricultural eco-efficiency growth in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 334, 130193. 48. Yu, G., ZHU, J., XU, L., & HE, N. (2022). Technological approaches to enhance ecosystem carbon sink in China: Nature-based solutions. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version), 37(4), 490-501. 49. Zhang, Z. (2023). Mitigating Investment Risks in Nature-Based Solutions: A Strategic Approach Towards Sustainable Project Implementation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 50. Zschornack, T., Bayer, C., Zanatta, J. A., Vieira, F. C. B., & Anghinoni, I. (2011). Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from flood-irrigated rice by no incorporation of winter crop residues into the soil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 35, 623-634. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102401 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討不同灌溉模式對茶園碳循環動態之影響，重點聚焦於宜蘭地區田間實際條件下，土壤有機碳（Soil Organic Carbon, SOC）儲存與二氧化碳（Carbon Dioxide, CO₂）通量之量化評估。研究採用密閉式靜態罩（Closed Static Chamber, CSC）進行原位氣體通量監測，並配合季度性土壤採樣，分析氣態碳排放與SOC累積變化，涵蓋三種土地利用情境：全灌溉茶園、雨養式茶園及廢耕坵塊。
實驗結果顯示，灌溉管理顯著影響茶園碳循環過程。相較於其他處理，全灌溉地塊表現出較低之CO₂排放與較高之SOC累積，展現出更強的碳封存潛能；雨養地塊則呈現通量波動性高與碳儲存效率低的特徵；廢耕地作為未受人為干預之對照，反映自然放任狀態下的土壤碳行為。儘管多年生作物系統在結構與操作上存在一定挑戰，CSC方法仍證實具備可行性與穩定性，適用於長期監測茶園溫室氣體排放。 灌溉在茶園碳循環調節中扮演關鍵角色，能同時提升作物生產力與土壤碳儲存。研究結果凸顯自然本位灌溉策略於氣候緩解上的潛力，並為永續土地管理提供具體指引。所建立之在地碳監測架構亦展現多年生農作系統整合農業發展與環境目標的可行性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates how different irrigation regimes influence carbon cycling in tea plantations, with a focus on quantifying soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and carbon dioxide (CO₂) fluxes under field conditions in Yilan, Taiwan. Through in-situ field monitoring using the closed static chamber (CSC) method and quarterly soil sampling, we examined gaseous carbon emissions and SOC accumulation in three distinct plots: a well-irrigated tea plantation, a rainfed tea field, and an abandoned tea plot.
The results reveal clear differences in carbon behavior under varying irrigation practices. Well-irrigated tea plantations demonstrated lower CO₂ emissions and higher SOC levels, indicating a stronger potential for carbon sequestration. Rainfed plots, by contrast, exhibited greater flux variability and lower carbon retention, while abandoned fields served as baselines for unmanaged soil conditions. The CSC method, despite structural challenges in perennial systems, proved to be a practical and consistent tool for long-term field monitoring. Irrigation plays a pivotal role in regulating carbon cycling in tea plantations, promoting both productivity and soil carbon storage. These results highlight the potential of nature-based irrigation for climate mitigation and offer guidance for sustainable land management. The localized carbon monitoring framework further demonstrates how perennial systems can integrate agricultural and environmental objectives. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-06-16T16:27:03Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-06-16T16:27:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledge i
Abstract iii 摘要 iv Table of Contents v List of Figures vii List of Tables xi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivation 4 1.3 Research objective 9 2. Literature review 12 2.1 Governance Frameworks and Nature-Based Solutions for Agricultural Carbon Management 12 2.2 Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics under Agricultural Management 17 2.3 Environmental Characteristics and Carbon Potential of Tea Plantations 22 2.4 Field-Based Measurement Techniques for Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes 28 3. Methodology 33 3.1 Site description 35 3.1.1 Soil characteristic investigation 37 3.2 Experimental design 42 3.2.1 Soil organic carbon (SOC) content monitor 42 3.2.2 Closed static chamber (CSC) measurement 44 3.3 Sampling procedures 53 3.3.1 Soil Sampling Procedures 53 3.3.2 Gas Sampling Procedures 57 3.4 Statistical Analysis 71 3.4.1 Signal Calibration and Concentration Quantification 73 3.4.2 Outlier Detection Based on the Interquartile Range (IQR) Method 80 3.4.3 Application of ANOVA for Validating Experimental Data 83 4. Results and Discussion 90 4.1 Spatial and Temporal variation of soil organic carbon stocks under contrasting irrigation treatments 90 4.1.1 In situ soil physical properties of the study plots 90 4.1.2 Spatial and temporal variation of SOC stocks 97 4.2 Temporal dynamics of carbon dioxide emissions under contrasting irrigation methods 106 4.2.1 Validation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Measurements and Replicate Consistency in Tea Plantations Using ANOVA 106 4.2.2 Monthly Dynamics of Carbon Fluxes Under Irrigation Treatments 110 4.2.3 Overall Trends and Patterns in CO₂ Concentration and Carbon Dynamics Across Treatments 126 4.2.4 Relationship Between Temperature and Carbon Flux Rate 131 5. Conclusions 139 References 142 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 密閉式靜態罩法 | - |
| dc.subject | 土壤有機碳 | - |
| dc.subject | 碳封存 | - |
| dc.subject | 永續農業 | - |
| dc.subject | Closed Static Chamber Method | - |
| dc.subject | Soil Organic Carbon | - |
| dc.subject | SOC | - |
| dc.subject | Carbon Sequestration | - |
| dc.subject | Sustainable Agriculture | - |
| dc.subject | Tea Garden | - |
| dc.title | 不同灌溉方式茶樹碳匯通量之機制解析與比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Mechanistic Analysis and Comparative Study of Carbon Fluxes in Tea Plantations under Different Irrigation Treatments | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 游晟暐 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Cheng-Wei Yu | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭友晉;許健輝 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yo-Jin Shiau;Chien-Hui Syu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 密閉式靜態罩法; 土壤有機碳; 碳封存; 永續農業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Closed Static Chamber Method; Soil Organic Carbon; SOC; Carbon Sequestration; Sustainable Agriculture; Tea Garden | en |
| dc.relation.page | 148 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600870 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-03-25 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-03-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.39 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。