請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102265完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李章銘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jang-Ming Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 宗孟瑋 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Meng Wei Chung | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-27T16:08:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-28 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-04-27 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Jin, W., et al., Global, regional, and national burden of esophageal cancer: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Biomarker Research, 2025. 13(1): p. 3.
2. Morgan, E., et al., The Global Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in 2020 and Projections to 2040: New Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020. Gastroenterology, 2022. 163(3): p. 649–658.e2. 3. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2022. 4. Shapiro, J., et al., Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2015. 16(9): p. 1090–1098. 5. Yang, H., et al., Long-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC5010 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg, 2021. 156(8): p. 721–729. 6. Liu, G., et al., Recurrence timing and patterns incorporating lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol, 2024. 14: p. 1310073. 7. Zanoni, A., et al., ypN0: Does It Matter How You Get There? Nodal Downstaging in Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016. 23(Suppl 5): p. 998–1004. 8. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature, 2017. 541(7636): p. 169–175. 9. Mariette, C. and J.P. Triboulet, Is preoperative chemoradiation effective in treatment of oesophageal carcinoma? The Lancet Oncology, 2005. 6(9): p. 635–637. 10. 衛生福利部癌症登記資料管理小組. (2023). 衛生福利部 111 年(2022)癌症登記報告:2022年癌症登記統計結果分析 [Cancer registry annual report 2022]. 衛生福利部. 11. Walsh, T.N., et al., A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med, 1996. 335(7): p. 462–7. 12. Bosset, J.F., et al., Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med, 1997. 337(3): p. 161–7. 13. Mandard, A.M., et al., Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer, 1994. 73(11): p. 2680–6. 14. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2021). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers. Version 2.2021. . 15. Meredith, K.L., et al., Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy is the Major Determinant of Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010. 17(4): p. 1159–1167. 16. Liu, J., et al., Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in real-world practice: an analysis of the clinical outcomes and long-term survival, and the feasibility of using major pathological response as a surrogate endpoint. European Journal of Medical Research, 2025. 30(1): p. 342. 17. Li, Y., et al., Impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy on postoperative safety in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol, 2025. 15: p. 1573597. 18. Zhang, S., et al., Development and Validation of PET/CT-Based Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Status in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2023. 30(12): p. 7452–7460. 19. Shao, L., et al., Three-field versus two-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched comparison. J Thorac Dis, 2018. 10(5): p. 2924–2932. 20. Zhang, X., et al., Accuracy of detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (preSINO trial): a prospective multicenter diagnostic cohort study.BMC Cancer,2020.20(1):p. 194. 21. Noordman, B.J., et al., Detection of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer (preSANO): a prospective multicentre, diagnostic cohort study. Lancet Oncol, 2018. 19(7): p. 965–974. 22. Blackham, A.U., et al., The prognostic value of residual nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in patients with complete primary tumor response. J Surg Oncol, 2015. 112(6): p. 597–602. 23. Chen, X.L., et al., Patterns of lymph node recurrence after radical surgery impacting on survival of patients with pT1-3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Korean Med Sci, 2014. 29(2): p. 217–23. 24. Jaber, J.J., et al., Multi-institutional investigation of the prognostic value of lymph nodel yield in advanced-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck, 2014. 36(10): p. 1446–52. 25. Lemieux, A., et al., Lymph Node Yield as a Predictor of Survival in Pathologically Node Negative Oral Cavity Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016. 154(3): p. 465–72. 26. Farrokhian, N., et al., Assessing Prognostic Value of Quantitative Neck Dissection Quality Measures in Patients With Clinically Node-Negative Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022. 148(10): p. 947–955. 27. Lu, R.D., et al., Increased resected lymph node stations improved survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer, 2024. 24(1): p. 177. 28. Zou, G.R., et al., Prognostic impact of cigarette smoking on the survival of patients with established esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving radiotherapy: A retrospective study from southern China. Exp Ther Med, 2019. 17(5): p. 3671–3681. 29. Zheng, Y., et al., Smoking affects treatment outcome in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received chemotherapy. PLoS One, 2015. 10(4): p. e0123246. 30. Tong, Y., D. Liu, and J. Zhang, Connection and distinction of tumor regression grading systems of gastrointestinal cancer. Pathol Res Pract, 2020. 216(9): p. 153073. 31. Becker, K., et al., Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer, 2003. 98(7): p. 1521–30. 32. Thies, S. and R. Langer, Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal carcinomas after neoadjuvant treatment. Front Oncol, 2013. 3: p. 262. 33. Wu, R., et al., Predictive Value of Tumor Regression Grading on the Prognosis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, 9900: p. 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000860. 34. Zhu, Y., et al., Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China. BMC Gastroenterology, 2017. 17(1): p. 41. 35. Mantziari, S., et al., Low-Dose Radiation Yields Lower Rates of Pathologic Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024. 31(4): p. 2499–2508. 36. Yang, Y., et al., Impact of Radiation Dose on Survival for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol, 2020. 10: p. 1431. 37. Qin, Q., et al., Does timing of esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation affect outcomes? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery, 2018. 59: p. 11–18. 38. Wang, J., et al., Impact of Preoperative Time Intervals for Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Short-term Postoperative Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Population-based Study Using the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) Data. Annals of Surgery, 2024. 280(5). 39. Karashima, R., et al., Advantages of FDG-PET/CT over CT alone in the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today, 2015. 45(4): p. 471–7. 40. Lee, J.Y., et al., Improved detection of metastatic lymph nodes in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma by combined interpretation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography. Cancer Imaging, 2019. 19(1): p. 40. 41. DeYoung, C.M., et al., The ability of whole body FDG18 PET imaging to predict pathologic response to induction chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. A prospective phase II trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2003. 57(2, Supplement): p. S165–S166. 42. Lai, H.H., et al., Maximum standardised uptake value of positron emission tomography as a predictor of oesophageal cancer outcomes. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2024. 19(1): p. 567. 43. Dewan, A., et al., Impact on Radiological and Pathological Response with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Its Effect on Survival in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Thoracic Esophagus. J Gastrointest Cancer, 2017. 48(1): p.42–49. 44. Levine, E.A., et al., Predictive value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in the identification of responders to chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg, 2006. 243(4): p. 472–8. 45. Flamen, P., et al., Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Annals of Oncology, 2002. 13(3): p. 361–368. 46. Nagaki, Y., et al., PET-Uptake Reduction into Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Therapy is Highly Predictive of Prognosis for Patients Who have Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy Plus Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022. 29(2): p. 1336–1346. 47. Jimenez-Jimenez, E., et al., Nodal FDG-PET/CT uptake influences outcome and relapse location among esophageal cancer patients submitted to chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2019. 21(9): p. 1159–1167. 48. Miyata, H., et al., Impact of number of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-positive lymph nodes on survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg, 2016. 103(1): p. 97–104. 49. Xu, M., et al., Prediction of lymph node metastasis by PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun, 2019. 40(9): p. 933–939. 50. Xia, L., et al., Prognostic value of baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol, 2023. 18(1): p. 41. 51. Deng, W., et al., A prognostic nomogram for overall survival after neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Oncotarget, 2017. 8(25): p. 41102–41112. 52. Lin, C.C., et al., Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with twice weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol, 2007. 18(1): p. 93–98. 53. Rizk, N.P., et al., Prognostic factors after combined modality treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Thorac Oncol, 2007. 2(12): p. 1117–23. 54. Downey, R.J., et al., Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial. J Clin Oncol, 2003. 21(3): p. 428–32. 55. Schoppmann, S.F., et al., Lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion diminishes prognosis in esophageal cancer. Surgery, 2013. 153(4): p. 526–34. 56. Rawat, S., et al., Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma esophagus: is surgical resection required? J Gastrointest Cancer, 2013. 44(3): p. 277–84. 57. Leng, X., et al., Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Lymph Node Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus: From the Results of NEOCRTEC5010, a Randomized Multicenter Study. Ann Surg, 2021. 274(6): p. e1022–e1029. 58. Swisher, S.G., et al., Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Ann Surg, 2005. 241(5): p. 810–7; discussion 817–20. 59. Sudo, N., et al., Clinical Utility of ypTNM Stage Grouping in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021. 28(2): p. 650–660. 60. Takei, S., et al., Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment to Predict Risk of Recurrence after Surgery in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Observational Study. Ann Surg, 2025. 61. Valkema, M.J., et al., Optimization of detection of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Annals of Esophagus, 2020. 4. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102265 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 食道鱗狀細胞癌在東亞地區相當常見,診斷時多已進展至局部晚期且合併淋巴結轉移。雖然術前輔助化學放射線治療合併手術已成為標準治療,並能改善部分患者預後,但術後復發風險仍高,臨床上極需更準確的預後評估工具,以輔助術後管理與追蹤決策。
方法: 本研究回顧分析接受術前輔助化學放射線治療與手術的臨床淋巴結陽性局部晚期食道鱗狀細胞癌患者之臨床、影像、治療及病理資料。透過單變項 Cox 回歸分析篩選預後因子,建立一套整合14項顯著預測變數的新型預後評分系統,並進行驗證分析以預測復發與死亡風險。 結果: 此預後評分模型具良好之區辨力與校正能力。預測總生存期方面,其準確率為76.9%,曲線下面積(AUC)為0.734;預測無惡化存活期方面,準確率為71.4%,AUC 為0.721。相較於傳統 AJCC 分期與僅使用病理因子的模型,本評分系統展現出更佳的預測表現。 結論: 本研究提出一套結合臨床、影像、治療與病理資訊的預後評估工具,不僅優於現行標準分期系統,亦具臨床實用性,可協助辨識高風險患者,進一步強化術後照護與追蹤策略。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background:
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a common malignancy in East Asia, frequently diagnosed at a locally advanced stage with lymph node involvement. Although chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has become the standard treatment and improves outcomes in selected patients, recurrence remains a significant concern. There is a need for accurate prognostic tools to guide postoperative management and follow-up strategies. Methods: This study analyzed clinical, imaging, treatment, and pathological data from patients with clinically node-positive, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Univariable Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors. A novel scoring system, integrating 14 significant predictors, was developed and validated to estimate survival and recurrence risk. Results: The prognostic scoring model showed good discrimination and calibration. For predicting overall survival, the scoring system achieved an accuracy of 76.9% and an area under the curve of 0.734. For progression-free survival, the accuracy was 71.4% with an area under the curve of 0.721. Compared with traditional staging methods and pathologic-only systems, the new complete scoring model demonstrated superior predictive performance. Conclusions: This study presents a new risk prediction tool that integrates clinical, imaging, treatment, and pathological data. It outperforms conventional staging and offers a practical approach for identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from more intensive postoperative care and monitoring. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-04-27T16:08:40Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-04-27T16:08:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
口試委員會審定書 1 中文摘要 2 Abstract 3 Acknowledgments 4 Figures and Tables 5 Chapter 1. Introduction 15 1.1 Background 15 1.2 Clinical Challenge and Research Rationale 15 1.3 Study Objective 16 Chapter 2. Literature Review 17 2.1 Epidemiology of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma 17 2.2 Current Treatment Strategies for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma 18 2.3 The Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Metastasis in ESCC 21 2.4 Prognostic Heterogeneity and Gaps in Current Research 23 2.5 Clinical, Imaging, and Pathological Prognostic Indicators of ESCC 24 2.5.1 Established Clinical & Pathological Prognostic Factors 24 2.5.2 nCRT Dose, Chemotherapy Regimen, and Timing to Surgery 25 2.5.3 Gaps: Imaging-Based Survival Predictors vs. Treatment Response Focus 26 2.6 Prognostic Utility and Limitations of PET/CT in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma 26 2.6.1 PET-Based Metabolic Response and Its Prognostic Implications 27 2.6.2 PET Prognostic Implications on LNM activity and N stage 28 2.6.3 Emerging PET Parameters: Spatial Metrics and Node-Based Analysis 28 2.8 Clinical Application and Research Motivation 29 Chapter 3. Methods 31 3.1 Patient selection 31 3.2 Statistical Analysis 32 3.3 Treatment plan 33 3.4 18FDG-PET/CT protocol 34 3.4.1 PET-Based Metabolic Response Definitions 34 3.5 Follow-up and definition of recurrence 35 Chapter 4 Result 36 4.1 Baseline Characteristics and Cohort Comparability 36 4.2 Prognostic Variable Selection and Impact in the Derivation Cohort 37 4.2.1 Patient-Related Factors 37 4.2.2 Imaging-Related Factors 37 4.2.3 Treatment-Related Factors 38 4.2.4 Pathology-Related Factors 38 4.2.5 Continuous Variable Cutoff Analysis 38 4.2.6 Ranking of Prognostic Factors by Effect Size 39 4.3 Set up PRIME Scoring System 39 4.3.1 Risk Stratification Based on PRIME Score 40 4.4 Validation of the PRIME Scoring System and Comparative Prognostic Performance 40 Chapter 5. Discussion 42 5.1 Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rate in Comparison with Previous Studies 42 5.2 Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival, and Recurrence Rate in Comparison with Previous Studies 42 5.3 Prognostic Performance and Limitations of PET-Derived Variables 44 5.4 Number of PET-positive nodal stations with potential prognostic value 45 5.5 Comparative Prognostic Performance of the PRIME Score, Pathologic-only system and AJCC Staging 46 5.6 From Traditional Staging to Multidimensional Prognostic Models: Insights from the PRIME Cohort 47 5.7 Incorporating Emerging Biomarkers and Advanced Imaging Analytics 48 Chapter 6. Limitations 50 Chapter 7. Conclusion 51 Reference: 52 Appendix. 56 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 局部晚期食道鱗狀細胞癌 | - |
| dc.subject | 淋巴結轉移 | - |
| dc.subject | 正子電腦斷層掃描 | - |
| dc.subject | 術前輔助化學放射治療 | - |
| dc.subject | 手術 | - |
| dc.subject | 預後評分系統 | - |
| dc.subject | Locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma | - |
| dc.subject | Lymph node metastasis | - |
| dc.subject | PET/CT | - |
| dc.subject | neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy | - |
| dc.subject | surgery | - |
| dc.subject | prognostic scoring system | - |
| dc.title | 淋巴轉移之局部晚期食道鱗狀細胞癌預後評分 系統之建立:結合病理、影像與臨床因子的多變項模型(PRIME評分系統) | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Development of a Prognostic Scoring System for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Clinical Lymph Node Metastasis at Diagnosis: A Multivariable Model Integrating Pathological, Radiological, and Clinical Factors (The PRIME Score) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建勳;成佳憲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jian-Xun Chen;Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 局部晚期食道鱗狀細胞癌,淋巴結轉移正子電腦斷層掃描術前輔助化學放射治療手術預後評分系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,Lymph node metastasisPET/CTneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapysurgeryprognostic scoring system | en |
| dc.relation.page | 57 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501917 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床醫學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-04-28 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 臨床醫學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 3.46 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
