Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物環境系統工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102259
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳富春zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorFu-Chun Wuen
dc.contributor.author林泓毅zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHung-Yi Linen
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-08T16:42:05Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-09-
dc.date.copyright2026-04-08-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-03-18-
dc.identifier.citation經濟部水利署(2025)。「河川斷面線位置圖」。水利署開放資料平台。取自 https://data.wra.gov.tw/WraStandardWrisp/Query/StandardDetail.aspx?DictID=293(最後更新時間:2025年1月15日)。
楊貴三(1988). 新店溪中游河流地形的研究. 地理教育, (14), 85–97.
薛煜達(2021)。應用Delft3D模式探討石門水庫排淤對淡水河口地貌變遷之影響(碩士論文,國立臺灣大學)。
錢寧. (1987). 河床演變學. 科學出版社.
龔任義(2000)。新店溪之地形研究(碩士論文,國立中央大學)。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
Allen, J. R. L. (1982). Sedimentary structures, their character and physical basis. Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co.
Arcement, G. J., & Schneider, V. R. (1989). Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2339
Ashley, G. M. (1990). Classification of large-scale subaqueous bedforms; a new look at an old problem. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 60(1), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.60.160
Ashmore, P. E. (1991). How do gravel-bed rivers braid? Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 28(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1139/e91-030
Ashworth, P. J. (1996). MID-CHANNEL BAR GROWTH AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL FLOW STRENGTH AND DIRECTION. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199602)21:2%253C103::AID-ESP569%253E3.0.CO;2-O
Bagnold, R. A. (1966). An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics. US government printing office.
Baynes, E. R. C., Lague, D., Attal, M., Gangloff, A., Kirstein, L. A., & Dugmore, A. J. (2018). River self-organisation inhibits discharge control on waterfall migration. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20767-6
Best, J. (2005). The fluid dynamics of river dunes: A review and some future research directions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 110(F4), 2004JF000218. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000218
Braudrick, C. A., Dietrich, W. E., Leverich, G. T., & Sklar, L. S. (2009). Experimental evidence for the conditions necessary to sustain meandering in coarse-bedded rivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(40), 16936–16941. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909417106
Carling, P. A. (1996). Morphology, sedimentology and palaeohydraulic significance of large gravel dunes, Altai Mountains, Siberia. Sedimentology, 43(4), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1996.tb02184.x
Carling, P. A. (1999). Subaqueous Gravel Dunes. SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research, Vol. 69 (1999),. https://doi.org/10.1306/D4268A2C-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D
Carling, P. A., Richardson, K., & Ikeda, H. (2005). A flume experiment on the development of subaqueous fine‐gravel dunes from a lower‐stage plane bed. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 110(F4), 2004JF000205. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000205
Carling, P. A., & Shvidchenko, A. B. (2002). A consideration of the dune:antidune transition in fine gravel. Sedimentology, 49(6), 1269–1282. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.2002.00496.x
Chartrand, S. M., Jellinek, A. M., Hassan, M. A., & Ferrer‐Boix, C. (2018). Morphodynamics of a Width‐Variable Gravel Bed Stream: New Insights on Pool‐Riffle Formation From Physical Experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 123(11), 2735–2766. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004533
Chin, A. (1999). The morphologic structure of step–pools in mountain streams. Geomorphology, 27(3–4), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(98)00083-X
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill.
Chu, H.-J., Chen, R.-A., Tseng, Y.-H., & Wang, C.-K. (2014). Identifying LiDAR sample uncertainty on terrain features from DEM simulation. Geomorphology, 204, 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.016
Chu, H.-J., Wang, C.-K., Huang, M.-L., Lee, C.-C., Liu, C.-Y., & Lin, C.-C. (2014). Effect of point density and interpolation of LiDAR-derived high-resolution DEMs on landscape scarp identification. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 51(6), 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2014.980086
Church, M. (2006). BED MATERIAL TRANSPORT AND THE MORPHOLOGY OF ALLUVIAL RIVER CHANNELS. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 34(1), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122721
Church, M., & Haschenburger, J. K. (2017). What is the “active layer”? Water Resources Research, 53(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019675
Cisneros, J., Best, J., Van Dijk, T., Almeida, R. P. D., Amsler, M., Boldt, J., Freitas, B., Galeazzi, C., Huizinga, R., Ianniruberto, M., Ma, H., Nittrouer, J. A., Oberg, K., Orfeo, O., Parsons, D., Szupiany, R., Wang, P., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Dunes in the world’s big rivers are characterized by low-angle lee-side slopes and a complex shape. Nature Geoscience, 13(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0511-7
Claude, N., Rodrigues, S., Bustillo, V., Bréhéret, J., Tassi, P., & Jugé, P. (2014). Interactions between flow structure and morphodynamic of bars in a channel expansion/contraction, Loire River, France. Water Resources Research, 50(4), 2850–2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015182
Deltares. (2024). Delft3D-FLOW User Manual: Simulation of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic flows and transport phenomena, including sediments. Deltares.
Drake, T. G., Shreve, R. L., Dietrich, W. E., Whiting, P. J., & Leopold, L. B. (1988). Bedload transport of fine gravel observed by motion-picture photography. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 192, 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088001831
Duró, G., Crosato, A., & Tassi, P. (2016). Numerical study on river bar response to spatial variations of channel width. Advances in Water Resources, 93, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.10.003
Edmonds, D. A., & Slingerland, R. L. (2007). Mechanics of river mouth bar formation: Implications for the morphodynamics of delta distributary networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 112(F2), 2006JF000574. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000574
Egozi, R., & Ashmore, P. (2009). Experimental analysis of braided channel pattern response to increased discharge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 114(F2), 2008JF001099. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001099
Engelund, F., & Hansen, E. (1967). A Monograph on Sediment Transport in Alluvial Streams. Teknisk Forlag.
Frings, R. M., Schüttrumpf, H., & Vollmer, S. (2011). Verification of porosity predictors for fluvial sand-gravel deposits. Water Resources Research, 47(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009690
Gaeuman, D., Andrews, E. D., Krause, A., & Smith, W. (2009). Predicting fractional bed load transport rates: Application of the Wilcock‐Crowe equations to a regulated gravel bed river. Water Resources Research, 45(6), 2008WR007320. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007320
Giardino, A., Werf, J. V. D., & Ormondt, M. V. (2010). Simulating Coastal Morphodynamics with Delft3D: Case study Egmond aan Zee. Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2596.9925
Guan, M., Wright, N. G., Sleigh, P. A., Ahilan, S., & Lamb, R. (2016). Physical complexity to model morphological changes at a natural channel bend. Water Resources Research, 52(8), 6348–6364. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017917
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open Channel Flow. Macmillan.
Hirano, M. (1971). RIVER-BED DEGRADATION WITH ARMORING. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1971(195), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej1969.1971.195_55
Hsueh, Y., Wu, F., Ye, Q., Lai, S. Y. J., & Tsang, Y. (2024). Reservoir Mud Releasing May Suboptimize Fluvial Sand Supply to Coastal Sediment Budget: Modeling the Impact of Shihmen Reservoir Case on Tamsui River Estuary. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR036701. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036701
Ikeda, S. (1982). Incipient motion of sand particles on side slopes. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 108(1), 95–114.
Ikeda, S. (1988). Lateral Bed Load Transport on Side Slopes. In Civil Engineering Practice 2. Technomic Publishing Company.
Iseya, F., & Ikeda, H. (1987). Pulsations in Bedload Transport Rates Induced by a Longitudinal Sediment Sorting: A Flume Study using Sand and Gravel Mixtures. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 69(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.1987.11880193
Julien, P. (2002). River mechanics. Cambridge university press.
Kalkwijk, J. P. Th., & Booij, R. (1986). Adaptation of secondary flow in nearly-horizontal flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 24(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688609499330
Keller, E. A. (1971). Areal Sorting of Bed-Load Material: The Hypothesis of Velocity Reversal. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 82(3), 753. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1971)82%255B753:ASOBMT%255D2.0.CO;2
Kennedy, J. F. (1969). The Formation of Sediment Ripples, Dunes, and Antidunes. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.01.010169.001051
Knighton, D. (1998). Fluvial forms and processes: A new perspective. Routledge.
Leendertse, J. J. (1967). Aspects of a computational model for long-period water-wave propagation.
Leendertse, J. J., & Gritton, E. C. (1971). A water-quality simulation model for well mixed estuaries and coastal seas: Vol. II, Computation Procedures.
Leendertse, J. J., Liu, D. S.-K., & Alexander, R. C. (1973). A three-dimensional model for estuaries and coastal seas: Volume I, Principles of computation.
Lefebvre, A., & Cisneros, J. (2023). The influence of dune lee side shape on time-averaged velocities and turbulence. Earth Surface Dynamics, 11(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-575-2023
Lesser, G. R., Roelvink, J. A., Van Kester, J. A. T. M., & Stelling, G. S. (2004). Development and validation of a three-dimensional morphological model. Coastal Engineering, 51(8–9), 883–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.07.014
Lotsari, E. S., Calle, M., Benito, G., Kukko, A., Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., & Alho, P. (2018). Topographical change caused by moderate and small floods in a gravel bed ephemeral river – a depth-averaged morphodynamic simulation approach. Earth Surface Dynamics, 6(1), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-163-2018
Luchi, R., Zolezzi, G., & Tubino, M. (2010). Modelling mid‐channel bars in meandering channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35(8), 902–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1947
Luijendijk, A. P., Ranasinghe, R., De Schipper, M. A., Huisman, B. A., Swinkels, C. M., Walstra, D. J. R., & Stive, M. J. F. (2017). The initial morphological response of the Sand Engine: A process-based modelling study. Coastal Engineering, 119, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.09.005
MacVicar, B., & Best, J. (2013). A flume experiment on the effect of channel width on the perturbation and recovery of flow in straight pools and riffles with smooth boundaries. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118(3), 1850–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20133
Meyer-Peter, E., & Müller, R. (1948). Formulas for bed-load transport. Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the International Association for Hydraulic Structures Research, 39–64.
Milan, D. J., & Heritage, G. L. (2012). LiDAR and ADCP Use in Gravel‐Bed Rivers: Advances Since GBR6. In M. Church, P. M. Biron, & A. G. Roy (Eds.), Gravel‐Bed Rivers (1st ed., pp. 286–302). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119952497.ch22
Montgomery, D. R., & Buffington, J. M. (1997). Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109(5), 596–611. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109%253C0596:CRMIMD%253E2.3.CO;2
Morgan, J. A., & Nelson, P. A. (2021). Experimental investigation of the morphodynamic response of riffles and pools to unsteady flow and increased sediment supply. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 46(4), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5072
Morvan, H., Knight, D., Wright, N., Tang, X., & Crossley, A. (2008). The concept of roughness in fluvial hydraulics and its formulation in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical simulation models. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 46(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2008.9521855
Nelson, P. A., Brew, A. K., & Morgan, J. A. (2015). Morphodynamic response of a variable‐width channel to changes in sediment supply. Water Resources Research, 51(7), 5717–5734. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016806
Nelson, P. A., Venditti, J. G., Dietrich, W. E., Kirchner, J. W., Ikeda, H., Iseya, F., & Sklar, L. S. (2009). Response of bed surface patchiness to reductions in sediment supply. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 114(F2), 2008JF001144. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001144
Paarlberg, A. J., Dohmen‐Janssen, C. M., Hulscher, S. J. M. H., & Termes, P. (2007). A parameterization of flow separation over subaqueous dunes. Water Resources Research, 43(12), 2006WR005425. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005425
Papanicolaou, A. N., & Hilldale, R. (2002). Turbulence Characteristics in Gradual Channel Transition. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(9), 948–960. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:9(948)
Parker, G. (1990). Surface-based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 28(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689009499058
Parker, G. (2004). 1D Sediment Transport Morphodynamics with Applications to Rivers and Turbidity Currents. Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign. http://hydrolab.illinois.edu/people/parkerg/morphodynamics_e-book.htm
Parker, G., Klingeman, P. C., & McLean, D. G. (1982). Bedload and Size Distribution in Paved Gravel-Bed Streams. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 108(4), 544–571. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0005854
Recking, A., Frey, P., Paquier, A., & Belleudy, P. (2009). An experimental investigation of mechanisms involved in bed load sheet production and migration. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 114(F3), 2008JF000990. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF000990
Redolfi, M., Bertoldi, W., Tubino, M., & Welber, M. (2018). Bed Load Variability and Morphology of Gravel Bed Rivers Subject to Unsteady Flow: A Laboratory Investigation. Water Resources Research, 54(2), 842–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021143
Rowland, J. C., Dietrich, W. E., & Stacey, M. T. (2010). Morphodynamics of subaqueous levee formation: Insights into river mouth morphologies arising from experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 115(F4), 2010JF001684. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001684
Schuurman, F., Shimizu, Y., Iwasaki, T., & Kleinhans, M. G. (2016). Dynamic meandering in response to upstream perturbations and floodplain formation. Geomorphology, 253, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.039
Seminara, G., Colombini, M., & Parker, G. (1996). Nearly pure sorting waves and formation of bedload sheets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 312, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096001991
Sloff, K., & Mosselman, E. (2012). Bifurcation modelling in a meandering gravel–sand bed river. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37(14), 1556–1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3305
Stelling, G. S. (1983). On the Construction of Computational Methods for Shallow Water Flow Problems [PhD thesis]. Delft University of Technology.
Stelling, G. S., & Leendertse, J. (1992). Approximation of Convective Processes by Cyclic AOI Methods. Estuarine and Coastal Modeling, 771–782.
Sutherland, J., Peet, A. H., & Soulsby, R. L. (2004). Evaluating the performance of morphological models. Coastal Engineering, 51(8–9), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.07.015
Thompson, D. M. (2011). The velocity-reversal hypothesis revisited. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 35(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133310369921
Van Dijk, W. M., Teske, R., Van De Lageweg, W. I., & Kleinhans, M. G. (2013). Effects of vegetation distribution on experimental river channel dynamics. Water Resources Research, 49(11), 7558–7574. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013574
Van Rijn, L. C. (1993). Principles of sediment transport in rivers, estuaries and coastal seas.
Venditti, J. G., Nelson, P. A., Bradley, R. W., Haught, D., & Gitto, A. B. (2017). Bedforms, Structures, Patches, and Sediment Supply in Gravel‐Bed Rivers. In D. Tsutsumi & J. B. Laronne (Eds.), Gravel‐Bed Rivers (1st ed., pp. 439–466). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118971437.ch16
Whiting, P. J., Dietrich, W. E., Leopold, L. B., Drake, T. G., & Shreve, R. L. (1988). Bedload sheets in heterogeneous sediment. Geology, 16(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016%253C0105:BSIHS%253E2.3.CO;2
Wilcock, P. R. (1998). Two-Fraction Model of Initial Sediment Motion in Gravel-Bed Rivers. Science, 280(5362), 410–412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5362.410
Wilcock, P. R., Barta, A. F., Shea, C. C., Kondolf, G. M., Matthews, W. V. G., & Pitlick, J. (1996). Observations of Flow and Sediment Entrainment on a Large Gravel‐Bed River. Water Resources Research, 32(9), 2897–2909. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR01628
Wilcock, P. R., & Crowe, J. C. (2003). Surface-based Transport Model for Mixed-Size Sediment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:2(120)
Wilcock, P. R., Kenworthy, S. T., & Crowe, J. C. (2001). Experimental study of the transport of mixed sand and gravel. Water Resources Research, 37(12), 3349–3358. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000683
Wilcock, P. R., & McArdell, B. W. (1993). Surface‐based fractional transport rates: Mobilization thresholds and partial transport of a sand‐gravel sediment. Water Resources Research, 29(4), 1297–1312. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02748
Wilkinson, S. N., Rutherfurd, I. D., & Keller, R. J. (2008). An experimental test of whether bar instability contributes to the formation, periodicity and maintenance of pool–riffle sequences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33(11), 1742–1756. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1645
Williams, R. D., Measures, R., Hicks, D. M., & Brasington, J. (2016). Assessment of a numerical model to reproduce event‐scale erosion and deposition distributions in a braided river. Water Resources Research, 52(8), 6621–6642. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018491
Wright, L. D. (1977). Sediment transport and deposition at river mouths: A synthesis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 88(6), 857. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1977)88%253C857:STADAR%253E2.0.CO;2
Wu, F., & Yeh, T. (2005). Forced bars induced by variations of channel width: Implications for incipient bifurcation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 110(F2), 2004JF000160. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000160
Wu, F.-C., Shao, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-C. (2011). Quantifying the forcing effect of channel width variations on free bars: Morphodynamic modeling based on characteristic dissipative Galerkin scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116(F3), F03023. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001941
Xiao, Y., Shao, X., Wang, H., & Zhou, G. (2012). Formation process of meandering channel by a 2D numerical simulation. International Journal of Sediment Research, 27(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(12)60037-7
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102259-
dc.description.abstract礫石砂丘之形態與輸砂行為,對河道阻力與河川形貌演變具有重要影響,而其演化機制更是理解礫石河床形貌動力之基礎問題。現有理論框架對其動力機制仍存在空缺,且在定義與分類上多以形態特徵為主,缺乏明確之動力判準。本研究團隊在新店溪上游山區漸擴礫石河段中,曾於颱洪事件前後觀察到舌狀砂丘之發育,然其演化過程仍缺乏充分了解。本研究旨在透過 Delft3D 進行二維深度平均之動床數值模擬,系統性探討礫石砂丘之形成與演化過程。研究透過三階段數值模擬逐步解析其動力機制:首先以單粒徑、現地同尺度之簡化漸擴渠道,解析礫石砂丘之基礎動力機制;其次納入多粒徑輸砂之篩化行為,探討複合動力下之砂丘演化;最後以完整條件進行現地模擬,以重現並解釋颱洪事件中砂丘之發展歷程。
單粒徑水槽共進行66組情境模擬,觀察到一致的形貌發展過程。床形由平床逐漸發展為砂丘,初期受渠道漸擴影響而產生他發性演化,渠寬漸擴使流速及剪應力遞減,形成淤積性床形,有別於定寬渠或漸縮渠所發展之床形。隨床形高度持續累積,砂丘轉為自發性演化,水理、輸砂與形貌之間產生持續交互作用,並形成一回饋循環機制。此循環由床面局部增積引致流場重分配,形成剪應力梯度及輸砂梯度,促進砂丘增積與推進,再回饋流場。本研究提出比流量差作為量化指標,發現迎風面出現局部水流兩側化,並於背風面重新集中時,將形成水深驟增並觸發回饋循環。據此,提出以水流兩側化作為砂丘在動力上存在之判定基準。
多粒徑水槽共進行78組模擬,在納入篩化行為後,觀察到篩化前緣與延長背風面之複合砂丘。本研究延續回饋循環機制之分析,說明篩化床面仍可產生具砂丘動力行為之形貌。結果顯示,剪應力梯度與粒徑梯度之權重關係具有高度相關性,並可據以區分砂丘頂點與篩化前緣之主導機制。基於上述機制,提出以粒徑為基礎之可動性指數作為動力分類參數,並與渠寬漸擴率共同作為礫石床形分類依據。模擬結果顯示,當漸擴率大於0.1且可動性指數大於0.65時,床面將具備產生砂丘回饋循環之能力。
現地颱洪事件之數值模擬結果顯示,中央砂洲頂部之舌狀砂丘亦呈現回饋循環之交互行為。比流量差與可動性指數之量化方式,經適當修正後可應用於現地複雜條件中。模擬結果指出,可動性指數隨流量變化跨越門檻時,床形將於複合砂丘與純礫石砂丘之間轉換,並可合理解釋退水過程中砂丘向平床之演化歷程。整體而言,本研究證實礫石砂丘之持續發展源於水流兩側化所啟動之回饋循環,並據此建立以水動力與形貌動力為基礎之礫石床形分類判準,統整水槽與現地觀測結果。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractGravel dune morphology and sediment transport behavior exert significant influences on channel bed resistance and river morphodynamics, and their evolution mechanisms constitute a fundamental problem in understanding the dynamics of gravel-bed morphology. However, existing theoretical frameworks still contain gaps in explaining the governing mechanisms, and current definitions and classification system rely primarily on morphological characteristics, lacking clear dynamic criteria. In the upstream mountainous reach of the upper Xindian River, we observed that a linguoid gravel dune formed during three consecutive flood events, yet their evolution processes remain poorly understood.
This study aims to systematically investigate the formation and evolution of gravel dunes using the two-dimensional depth-averaged morphodynamic model Delft3D. A three-stage numerical approach was adopted to progressively resolve the governing mechanisms. First, schematized simulations with single-size gravel, field-scale gradually expanding channels were used to identify the fundamental dynamics of gravel dunes. Second, grain-sorting processes were included to examine dune evolution under composite mechanisms. Finally, simulations of the upper Xindian River field case were conducted to reproduce and interpret dune development during flood events.
In the single-size numerical flume experiments, a total of 66 scenarios were simulated, revealing a consistent morphological evolution process. The bed feature evolved from an initial plane bed into a dune bedform. In the early stage, this evolution was allogenic, driven by the gradual expansion of the channel. The channel expansion reduced flow velocity and bed shear stress, resulting in a depositional feature distinct from those formed in constant-width or gradually constricting channels. As the dune continued to grow, the evolution transitioned to autogenic, governed by continuous interactions among hydraulics, sediment transport, and morphology. This process forms a feedback loop mechanism, in which local bed aggradation redistributes the flow field, generating gradients in bed shear stress and sediment transport, and subsequently promoting dune growth and migration. Specific discharge difference was introduced as a quantitative indicator of flow bifurcation. Results show that when the flow bifurcation occurs on the stoss side and re-concentration on the lee side, a local increase in water depth is induced, triggering the feedback loop. Based on this finding, flow bifurcation is proposed as a dynamic criterion for autogenic evolution of gravel dunes.
In the multi-size numerical flume experiments comprising 78 scenarios of different grain sorting processes, shallow sorting fronts and complex dunes with extended lee sides were observed. By applying the feedback loop mechanism, the results demonstrate that multi-size gravel beds still exhibit dynamic dune behaviors. A strong correlation was found between shear-stress gradients and grain-size gradients, allowing the dominant mechanisms at the dune crest and sorting front to be distinguished. Based on these findings, a grain-size-based mobility index is proposed as a dynamic parameter for bedform classification, along with the rate of channel expansion to be used as a geometric parameter. Results show that when the expansion rate exceeds 0.1 and the mobility index exceeds 0.65, the feedback loop was established sustaining dune development.
Simulations of field case further show that the linguoid dune that formed on the crest of the mid-channel bar during floods exhibit a similar feedback mechanism. Applications of the specific discharge difference and mobility-based classification, with appropriate modifications, were successful under complex real-world conditions. Results indicate that transformation would occur between simple and complex gravel dunes as the mobility index became above or below the threshold value with changing discharge, explaining the observed dune planed-down during the falling stage of flood events. Overall, this study demonstrates that gravel-dune development is sustained by a feedback loop initiated by flow bifurcation, and establishes a dynamics-based classification framework that unifies flume and field observations.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-04-08T16:42:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-04-08T16:42:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目次 v
圖次 x
表次 xvi
符號表 xvii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究區域 3
1.3 文獻回顧 5
1.3.1 礫石河床特性 5
1.3.2 研究區域之主要地貌定義 7
1.3.3 研究區域之次要地貌特性 12
1.3.4 漸擴渠之水理與動床研究 15
1.3.5 礫石河床漸擴水槽實驗 16
1.4 研究問題與架構 18
第二章 Delft-3D模式與驗證 20
2.1 數值模式概述 20
2.1.1 文獻回顧 20
2.1.2 模式架構 21
2.2 計算網格 23
2.2.1 曲線網格(curvilinear grid) 23
2.2.2 域分解(Domain decomposition) 24
2.3 水動力模組 25
2.3.1 控制方程式 25
2.3.2 數值方法與時間步階 27
2.4 形貌動力模組 28
2.4.1 形貌更新 29
2.4.2 輸砂率計算 30
2.4.3 多層床(multiple layers)計算 34
2.5 附加修正機制設定 38
2.5.1 二次流參數化修正 38
2.5.2 輸砂床坡效應 39
2.6 模式案例驗證 41
2.6.1 驗證案例概要 41
2.6.2 模式設定 42
2.6.3 模擬結果與啟示 44
第三章 單粒徑漸擴水槽之數值實驗與形貌動力機制 49
3.1 水槽設計與模式設定 49
3.1.1 水槽幾何設計 50
3.1.2 水理參數設定 51
3.1.3 輸砂參數設定 53
3.1.4 情境模擬設定 56
3.2 模擬結果 58
3.2.1 模擬結果概述 58
3.2.2 形貌發展結果 63
3.2.3 水理結果 66
3.2.4 輸砂結果 71
3.2.5 整體演變過程 74
3.3 結果處理與數據分析 75
3.3.1 座標系統與空間基準 75
3.3.2 動力指標定義 78
3.3.3 模擬資料處理方法 81
3.4 模擬結果:兩階段演化機制 83
3.4.1 水流兩側化前之他發性演化(漸擴幾何主導) 84
3.4.2 水流兩側化後之自發性演化(回饋循環主導) 87
3.5 討論:與其他幾何條件之比較 95
3.5.1 與定寬水槽之比較 95
3.5.2 與漸縮水槽之比較 99
3.5.3 與延伸水槽之比較 104
3.5.4 單粒徑水槽實驗總結 106
第四章 多粒徑漸擴水槽之數值實驗與形貌動力機制 107
4.1 高流量模擬結果-複合砂丘(complex dune) 109
4.1.1 形貌發展結果 110
4.1.2 水理結果 113
4.1.3 輸砂結果 118
4.1.4 整體演變過程 123
4.2 低流量模擬結果-篩化前緣(sorting front) 125
4.2.1 形貌發展結果 126
4.2.2 水理結果 128
4.2.3 輸砂結果 132
4.2.4 整體演變過程 136
4.3 動力機制分析與討論 138
4.3.1 篩化行為與篩化前緣之動力機制 139
4.3.2 複合砂丘之動力機制整合 145
4.3.3 水理效應與粒徑效應於複合砂丘演化中的主導關係 149
4.4 底床可動性分析 157
4.4.1 篩化前緣與片狀床載之對比 157
4.4.2 可動性指數(Mobility index, D84*) 159
4.4.3 可動性指數與幾何效應之礫石床形相位圖(phase diagram) 163
4.4.4 多粒徑水槽實驗總結 171
第五章 現地應用 172
5.1 模式設定 172
5.1.1 計算域網格製作 172
5.1.2 水深地形資料建模 177
5.1.3 流量邊界條件 181
5.1.4 水理參數設定 185
5.1.5 輸砂參數設定 186
5.2 模式驗證 191
5.2.1 整體沖淤空間分佈 193
5.2.2 橋墩周圍之局部沖淤特徵 195
5.2.3 砂丘縱剖面變化 196
5.3 模擬結果與討論 200
5.3.1 形貌變化過程 200
5.3.2 颱洪事件對應之全域模擬結果 202
5.3.3 砂丘局部之模擬結果 208
5.4 現地與水槽數值實驗之理論驗證與討論 212
5.4.1 礫石砂丘的動力機制與水流兩側化現地應用 213
5.4.2 現地案例之可動性指數量化與礫石床形界定 218
5.4.3 現地應用結論 226
第六章 結論與建議 227
6.1 結論 227
6.1.1 單粒徑水槽實驗-砂丘動力機制的確定 227
6.1.2 多粒徑水槽實驗-複合砂丘機制與可動性指數床形分類 227
6.1.3 現地應用-砂丘在颱洪事件的動態發展歷程 228
6.2 限制 229
6.3 建議 231
6.3.1 變量流(流量歷線)效應: 231
6.3.2 跨機制之交互關係 231
6.3.3 分選前緣與片狀床載 232
參考文獻 233
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject漸擴渠-
dc.subject礫石砂丘-
dc.subject形貌動力-
dc.subjectDelft3D模式-
dc.subject可動性-
dc.subject粒徑篩化-
dc.subjectgradually expanding channel-
dc.subjectgravel dune-
dc.subjectmorphodynamics-
dc.subjectDelft3D-
dc.subjectmobility-
dc.subjectgrain sorting-
dc.title漸擴渠之單粒徑與多粒徑礫石砂丘形貌動力數值研究zh_TW
dc.titleNumerical Investigation on Morphodynamics of Single-Size and Multiple-Size Gravel Dunes in Gradually Expanding Channelsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear114-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee周憲德;陳樹群;詹錢登;周逸儒zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHsien-Ter Chou;Su-Chin Chen;Chyan-Deng Jan;Yi-Ju Chouen
dc.subject.keyword漸擴渠,礫石砂丘形貌動力Delft3D模式可動性粒徑篩化zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordgradually expanding channel,gravel dunemorphodynamicsDelft3Dmobilitygrain sortingen
dc.relation.page240-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202600752-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2026-03-18-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept生物環境系統工程學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2031-03-18-
顯示於系所單位:生物環境系統工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-114-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
23.53 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved