請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10189
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李玲玲(Ling-Ling Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chung-Yi Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林宗以 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:08:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-22 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:08:32Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 六、參考文獻
Ahrestani F.S. 1999. Population density estimates for mammalian herbivores in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, South India. Syracuse University, New York. Bagchi S., Goyal S.P. and Sankar K. 2003. Prey abundance and prey selection by tigers (Panthera tigris) in a semi-arid, dry deciduous forest in western India. Journal of Zoology 260: 285-290. Biswas S. and Sankar K. 2002. Prey abundance and food habit of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Zoology 256: 411-420. Borah J., Deka K., Dookia S. and Gupta R.P. 2009. Food habits of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in Satpura Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Mammalia 73: 85-88. Bubenik R.A. 1982. Physiology. In: Thomas J. W. and Toweill D. E. (eds), Elk of North America. Ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA. pp. 125-179. Cook J.G. 2002. Nutrition and food. In: Toweill D. E. and Thomas J. W. (eds), North America Elk: Ecology and Management. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London, pp. 259-349. Côté S.D., Rooney T.P., Tremblay J.-P., Dussault C. and Waller D.M. 2004. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 113-147. Campbell D., Swanson G.M. and Sales J. 2004. Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 1185-1196. Chiang P.-J. 2007. Ecology and conservation of Formosan clouded leopard, its prey, and other sympatric carnivores in southern Taiwan. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A., p. 249. Demaría M.R., McShea W.J., Koy K. and Maceira N.O. 2004. Pampas deer conservation with respect to habitat loss and protected area considerations in San Luis, Argentina. Biological Conservation 115: 121-130. Eisenburg J.F. and Lockhart M. 1972. An ecological reconnaissance of Wilpattu National Park, Ceylon. Smithsonian Contribution to Zoology 101: 1-118. Forsyth D.M., Barker R.J., Morriss G. and Scroggie M.P. 2007. Modeling the relationship between fecal pellet indices and deer density. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 964-970. Fuller R.J. and Gill R.M.A. 2001. Ecological impacts of increasing numbers of deer in British woodland. Forestry 74: 193-199. Fuller T.K. 1991. Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population change? Journal of Wildlife Management 55: 393-396. Fuller T.K. 1992. Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population change - a reply. Journal of Wildlife Management 56: 613-613. Geist V. 1998. Deer of the world: their evolution, behaviour, and ecology. Stackpole Books. Gill R.M.A. 1992a. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests .3. impact on trees and forests. Forestry 65: 363-388. Gill R.M.A. 1992b. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. deer. Forestry 65: 145. Gill R.M.A. and Beardall V. 2001. The impact of deer on woodlands: the effects of browsing and seed dispersal on vegetation structure and composition. Forestry 74: 209-218. Gill R.M.A. and Morgan G. 2010. The effects of varying deer density on natural regeneration in woodlands in lowland Britain. Forestry 83: 53-63. Gray J.S., Kahl O., Janetzki C. and Stein J. 1992. Studies on the ecology of lyme disease in a deer forest in County Galway, Ireland. Journal of Medical Entomology 29: 915-920. Hill K., McMillan G. and Fariña R. 2003. Hunting-related changes in game encounter rates from 1994 to 2001 in the Mbaracayu Reserve, Paraguay. Conservation Biology 17: 1312. Jathanna D., Karanth K.U. and Johnsingh A.J.T. 2003a. Estimation of large herbivore densities in the tropical forests of southern India using distance sampling. Journal of Zoology 261: 285-290. Jathanna D., Karanth K.U. and Johnsingh A.J.T. 2003b. Estimation of large herbivore densities in the tropical forests of southern India using distance sampling. Journal of Zoology 261: 285-290. Karanth K.U. 1995. Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biological Conservation 71: 333-338. Karanth K.U., Nichols J.D. and Kumar N.S. 2011. Estimating tiger abundance from camera trap data: field surveys and analytical issues. In: O’Connell A. F., Nichols J. D. and Karanth K. U. (eds), Camera Traps in Animal Ecology. Springer Japan, pp. 97-117. Karanth K.U. and Sunquist M.E. 1992. Population structure, density and biomass of large herbivores in the tropical forests of Nagarahole, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8: 21-35. Khan J.A., Chellam R., Rodgers W.A. and Johnsingh A.J.T. 1996. Ungulate densities and biomass in the tropical dry deciduous forests of Gir, Gujarat, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 149-162. Kumar N.S. 2000. Ungulate density and biomass in the tropical semi-arid forest of Ranthambore, India. Pondicherry University. Leslie D.M., Jr. 2011. Rusa unicolor (Artiodactyla: Cervidae). Mammalian Species 43: 1-30. Lewis J.C., Flynn L.B., Marchinton R.L., Shea S.M. and Marchinton E.M. 1990. Ecology of sambar deer on St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge, Florida, USA. Bulletin of Tall Timbers Research Station 25: 1-107. MacCracken J.G. and Van Ballenberge V. 1987. Age-and sex-related differences in fecal pellet dimensions of moose. The Journal of Wildlife Management 51: 360-364. Martin J.-L., Stockton S., Allombert S. and Gaston A. 2010. Top-down and bottom-up consequences of unchecked ungulate browsing on plant and animal diversity in temperate forests: lessons from a deer introduction. Biological Invasions 12: 353-371. Martin T.E. 2007. Climate correlates of 20 years of trophic changes in a high-elevation riparian system. Ecology 88: 367-380. Mathews N., DeWoody A., Porter W., Skow L. and Honeycutt R. 1997. Genetic variation as a predictor of social structure. In: McShea W. J., Underwood H. B. and Rappole J. H. (eds), The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 99-119. Mayle B.A. 1996. Progress in predictive management of deer populations in British woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 187-198. Mayle B.A., Peace A.J. and Gill R.M.A. 1999. How many deer?: a field guide to estimating deer population size. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. Mayle B.A., Putman R.J. and Wyllie I. 2000. The use of trackway counts to establish an index of deer presence. Mammal Review 30: 233-237. McCullough D.R. 1974. Status of larger animals in Taiwan. Tourist Bureau Taipei. Taiwan, ROC. Neff D.J. 1968. The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution: a review. Journal of Wildlife Management 32: 597-614. Neff D.J., Wallmo O.C. and Morrison D.C. 1965. A determination of defecation rate for elk. Journal of Wildlife Management 29: 406-407. Ngampongsai C. 1987. Habitat use by the sambar Cervus unicolor in Thailand- a case study for Khao Yai National Park. In: Wemmer C. M. (ed), Biology and Management of the Cervidae. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 289-298. Oliver W.L.R. 1993. Threatened endemic Artiodactyls of the Philippines: status and future priorities. International Zoo Yearbook 32: 131-144. Oliver W.L.R., Cox C.R. and Dolar L.L. 1991. The Philippine spotted deer conservation project. Oryx 25: 199-205. Post E. and Pedersen C. 2008. Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 12353-12358. Putman R.J. 1996. Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems: perspectives and recommendations for future research. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 205-214. Putman R.J. and Moore N.P. 1998. Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mammal Review 28: 141-164. Rand P.W., Lubelczyk C., Lavigne G.R., Elias S., Holman M.S., Lacombe E.H. and Smith R.P. 2003. Deer density and the abundance of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 40: 179-184. Rooney T.P. 2001. Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective. Forestry 74: 201. Rooney T.P. and Waller D.M. 2003. Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 181: 165-176. Rovero F. and Marshall A.R. 2009. Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1011-1017. Sánchez Rojas G., Gallina S. and Equihua M. 2004. Pellet morphometry as a tool to distinguish age and sex in the mule deer. Zoo Biology 23: 139-146. Sankar K. and Johnsingh A.J.T. 2002. Food habits of tiger (Panthera tigris) and leopard (Panthera pardus) in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India, as shown by scat analysis. Mammalia 66: 285-289. Shrestha M.K. 2004. Relative ungulate abundance in a fragmented landscape: implications for tiger conservation. University of Minnesota. Stromayer K.A.K. and Warren R.J. 1997. Are overabundant deer herds in the eastern United States creating alternate stable states in forest plant communities? Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 227-234. Tilghman N.G. 1989. Impacts of white-Tailed deer on forest regeneration in northwestern Pennsylvania. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 524-532. Timmins R.J., Steinmetz R., Sagar Baral H., Samba Kumar N., Duckworth J.W., Anwarul Islam M.d., Giman B., Hedges S., Lynam A.J., Fellowes J., Chan B.P.L. and Evans T. 2008. Rusa unicolor. IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1. [23 April 2011 cited]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org Wang S.W. 2010. Estimating population densities and biomass of ungulates in the temperate ecosystem of Bhutan. Oryx 44: 376-382. Wang S.W. and Macdonald D.W. 2009. Feeding habits and niche partitioning in a predator guild composed of tigers, leopards and dholes in a temperate ecosystem in central Bhutan. Journal of Zoology 277: 275-283. Welch D., Staines B.W., Scott D. and French D.D. 1992. Leader browsing by red and roe deer on young sitka spruce trees in western Scotland. II. effects on growth and tree form. Forestry 65: 309-330. White G.C. 1992. Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population change?: a comment. Journal of Wildlife Management 56: 611-612. Yamada K., Elith J., McCarthy M. and Zerger A. 2003. Eliciting and integrating expert knowledge for wildlife habitat modelling. Ecological Modelling 165: 251-264. 王穎、林文昌。1987。臺灣地區山產店對野生動物資源利用調查(II)。 行政院農業委員會生態研究第021號。 王穎。1988。臺灣地區山產店對野生動物資源利用調查(III)。行政院農業委員會生態研究第017號。 呂光洋、張巍薩、花炳榮。1990。玉里野生動物保護區動物相調查。臺灣省林務局保育研究系列79-02號。 李玲玲、林宗以。2003。台灣水鹿的食性研究。行政院農業委員會林務局保育研究系列第93-2號。 李玲玲、林宗以。2004。臺灣水鹿食性暨玉里野生動物保護區水鹿族群生態研究(二)。行政院農業委員會林務局保育研究系列第92-3號。 李玲玲、林宗以、池文傑。2007。玉山國家公園南二段地區中大型哺乳動物調查暨臺灣水鹿族群間監測計畫。內政部營建署玉山國家公園管理處。 邱祈榮、陳子英、劉和義、王震哲、葉慶龍、謝長富。2009。臺灣現生天然植群圖集。行政院農業委員會林務局。 翁國精、林宗以、蔡及文。2009。玉山國家公園新康山區暨南二段中大型哺乳動物調查計畫。玉山國家公園管理處。 翁國精、林宗以、張書德、范震華。2010。玉山國家公園新康山區中大型哺乳動物監測暨水鹿族群生態調查。玉山國家公園管理處。 馬春祥、楊錫坤。1996。養鹿學。國立編譯館。 郭正彥。2004。磐石山區高地草原臺灣水鹿之日間行為。國立臺灣師範大學生命科學研究所碩士論文。 裴家騏、姜博仁。2004。大武山自然保留區及其周邊地區雲豹及其他中大型動物之現況與保育研究(三)。行政院農委會林務局保育研究92-2號。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10189 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 建立大型鹿科動物合適且標準化的密度估算方法,以獲得牠們的密度、變化趨勢,並分析牠們對棲地的選擇模式,為大型鹿科動物經營管理上最迫切需要的資訊。臺灣水鹿為臺灣最大型的草食獸,廣泛棲息於海拔150 ~ 3800 m的山區,然而對於牠們在臺灣的密度及棲地利用模式所知相當有限。本研究於2003 - 2005年以糞堆累積速率計數法透過設置固定寬度的穿越帶,對不同棲地類型進行糞堆密度調查,來估算玉里野生動物保護區臺灣水鹿的族群密度,並以forward stepwise selection複迴歸分析穿越帶的水鹿密度指標與各種棲地因子的關係,來獲得水鹿的棲地利用模式。
2003-2005年玉里野生動物保護區臺灣水鹿的平均密度為10.60隻 / km2 (SE = 2.26隻 / km2),數量為1210隻(SE = 258隻)。其中位於高海拔的太平谷¬-馬布谷的密度為21.81隻/ km2(SE = 3.76隻 / km2),密度相當高。玉里野生動物保護區周邊地區雄鹿比例顯著較保護區核心區域高,推測這些地區的水鹿族群可能為新近重新再建立的族群。水鹿棲地利用的模式包含4個棲地因子,整體模式達顯著(F4,58= 48.43,p < 0.001),且解釋了75.3%的密度變異。4個棲地因子分別為是否為森草交界類型(係數為0.157 隻 / ha)、是否為松類森林(係數為0.115隻 / ha)、非玉山箭竹的禾草類覆蓋度(係數為0.171隻 / ha)及樹葉類的物種數(係數為-0.002隻 / ha)等,常數為0.109隻 / ha。4個棲地因子係數都顯著不為0(前二者p < 0.001,後二者p = 0.001)。模式顯示在玉里野生動物保護區,以位於松林與箭竹草原交界的環境、非玉山箭竹的禾草類覆蓋度較高且樹葉類物種數較少的環境,為水鹿利用率最高的環境。本研究顯示玉里野生動物保護區高海拔地區水鹿族群密度相當高,應留意高密度族群對於森林植被更新與演替的效應。同時臺灣水鹿的糞堆分解速率在海拔、植被間差異明顯,進行糞堆計數及以糞堆當作棲地利用指標時,需要納入考量。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Standardized method of estimating population density in large cervids provides information for long-term monitoring, habitat use, etc and is urgently needed in the forest management. Formosan sambar (Rusa unicolor swinhoii) is the largest herbivore in Taiwan, which widely inhabits the mountains ranged from 150 to 3800m in elevation; however, the population size and habitat preference of this species is still unclear. We estimated the population density of sambar in Yuli Wildlife Refuge using faecal accumulation rate mothod (FAR) and dung counts with fixed-width strip transect sampling. The habitat use model was then constructed using multiple regression with forward stepwise selection, where habitat characteristics were regressed against density index of sambar.
The average density of sambar in Yuli Wildlife Refuge is 10.6/km2 (SE = 2.26) during 2003-2005 and the population size is around 1,210 (SE = 258). The highest density in the study region is 21.81/ km2 (SE = 3.76) in the Taipin Valley-Mabu Valley. The habitat model explained a significant amount of variation (75.3%), where four habitat characteristics were included (forest-grassland edge, pine forest, non-bamboo grass coverage and diversity of forbs). Sambar prefers the edge of pine forest and bamboo grassland (coefficient: 0.157/ ha, P < 0.001), pine forest (coefficient: 0.115/ ha, P < 0.001), high coverage of non-bamboo grass (coefficient: 0.171/ha, P = 0.001), and low diversity of forbs (coefficient: -0.002/ha, P = 0.001). Our results showed that decomposition rates of Formosan sambar’s dung differed significantly among altitudes and vegetation types, and should be considered when using pellet group count as a measure of habitat use. The high population density of sambar in Yuli Wildlife Refuge can potentially effect on forest renewal and succession and the intense monitoring plan is suggested. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:08:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-F87225020-1.pdf: 1817311 bytes, checksum: f1c2b24e87f1372453656c7d9a161ff0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………………………I
誌謝………………………………………………………………….………..II 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………….V 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………….VII 一、前言…………………………………………………………………………1 二、研究樣區…………….………………………………………………………6 2.1研究樣區概述………………………….……………………………6 2.2植被類型與海拔分帶分布比例.…………….……………………...7 三、研究方法……………………………………………………………………9 3.1野外取樣………………………………………..……………9 3.1.1穿越帶設置…..…………………………..……………9 3.1.2糞堆計數…..…………………………………….……13 3.1.3糞堆分解試驗………………………...………….……15 3.2族群密度估算………………………………….……..…………….……16 3.2.1密度指標估算……………………..……………….……16 3.2.2各棲地類型面積……………………….……..…….………17 3.2.3族群數量與密度估算……………….……..……….………18 3.2.3.1南北2大樣區密度估算…………...………..………18 3.2.3.2玉里野生動物保護區族群數量與密度估算…….…18 3.3棲地利用分析………………………………….……..……………….…18 3.3.1巨觀因子………………………….……..…………..….…19 3.3.2微棲地因子………………………….……..………..….…20 3.3.3其他因子………………………….…..…………..….…21 3.3.4統計分析………………………….…..…………..….…21 四、結果………………………………….……………….………….…22 4.1糞堆計數……………………………..……..…………………22 4.2糞堆分解試驗…………………………….….…...….…………22 4.3族群密度估算…………………………………..……...………22 4.3.1棲地類型密度指標…………………….……..………22 4.3.2棲地類型有效面積…………………….……..………23 4.3.3數量與密度估算…………………….….……..………24 4.3.4性別與成幼比例…………………..….….……..………24 4.4棲地利用…………….……….…..…..….….……..………25 五、討論…………….……….…..…………..….….……..………26 5.1玉里野生動物保護區水鹿密度………….…..………26 5.2水鹿族群增加的原因分析…….……………..………27 5.3應用糞堆計數法估算大型草食獸密度的建議…………28 5.4玉里野生動物保護區水鹿性別、成幼比例……………30 5.5玉里野生動物保護區臺灣水鹿棲地利用…….….………32 5.6結論與經營管理上的建議………..….….……..………33 六、參考文獻……….……….…..…………..….….…….……36 圖……….……….…..……………………..…..….….…….……45 表……….……….…..……………………..…..….….…….……51 附錄1……….……….…..……………………..…..….….…….……63 附錄2……….……….…..……………………..…..….….…….……67 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 玉里野生動物保護區臺灣水鹿(Rusa unicolor swinhoii)棲地利用與密度估算 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Habitat Use and Density Estimation of Formosan Sambar (Rusa unicolor swinhoii) in Yuli Wildlife Refuge | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 趙榮台,李培芬,謝長富,吳海音 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 臺灣水鹿,糞堆累積速率法,密度估算,棲地使用,性別比例,糞堆分解速率, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Formosan sambar,Rusa unicolor swinhoii,faecal accumulation rate,density estimation,habitat use,sex ratio,faecal decomposition rate., | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.77 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。