請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101876完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周嘉辰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chia-Chen Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳佳穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Ying Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-05T16:23:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-06 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文
于振亞（2015）。《筆桿子與刀把子:中國人權政策黨政邏輯的詮釋》。臺北：臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系，碩士論文。 王信賢（2018）。〈科技威權主義：習近平「新時代」 中國大陸國家社會關係〉，《展望與探索》，16(5)：111-127。 田先紅（2022a）。〈問責-避責關係新解：基於「行動-制度-環境」架構。〉，《華中農業大學學報 (社會科學版)》，2022(5): 38-48。 田先紅（2022b）。〈“數字避責”: 重大突發公共事件中基層官員避責行為研究——基於多案例的綜合分析。〉，《廣西師範大學學報》(哲學社會科學版)》，58(1): 74-87。 朱春奎、錢玉進（2020）。〈突發公共事件在主流媒體微博空間傳播機制研究。〉，《電子科技大學學報社科版》，22(5): 1-10。 李岩（2014）。〈自媒體環境下的 「官媒」 特質與舉措〉，《今傳媒》，22(12): 114-115。 李連江（2012）。〈差序政府信任〉，《二十一世紀》，131: 108-114。 高頡（2014）。〈多種類型的威權主義: 中國政體類型的探討〉，《中國大陸研究》，57(3)：1-38。 陳岩（2023）。〈中國醫療反腐：醫生與藥代親身揭內幕風暴之後如何改革？〉，《BBC 中文網》。8月21日。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-66552855。2024/1/30檢索。 陳韋帆、古倫維（2018）。〈中文情感語意分析套件 CSentiPackage 簡介〉，《圖書館學與資訊科學》，44 (1)：24-41。 梁軍、柴玉梅、原慧斌、昝紅英、劉銘（2014）。〈基於深度學習的微博情緒分析〉，《中文資訊學報》，28(5)：155-161。 張昆(2006）。〈大眾媒介的政治屬性與政治功能〉，《武漢大學學報(人文科學版)》，59(1)：96-100。 黃宗智（2021）。〈民主主義與群眾主義之間: 中國民眾與國家關係的歷史回顧與前瞻願想〉，《文史哲》，(2)：5-15。 黃曉玲、戴良鐵（2016）。〈醫生群體因素在醫病關係中影響及評估〉，《中國公共衛生》，32(9)：1246-1248。 貳、英文 Bach, T., & Wegrich, K. (2019). "The politics of blame avoidance in complex delegation structures: the public transport crisis in Berlin." European Political Science Review, 11(4): 415–431. Baekkeskov, E., & Rubin, O. (2017). "Information dilemmas and blame‐avoidance strategies: From secrecy to lightning rods in Chinese health crises." Governance, 30(3): 425-443. Boin, A., Hart, P. T., McConnell, A., & Preston, T. (2010). "Leadership style, crisis response and blame management: The case of Hurricane Katrina." Public administration, 88(3): 706-723. Cai, Y. (2002). "The resistance of Chinese laid-off workers in the reform period." The China Quarterly,170: 327-344. Chen, D. (2017). “Supervision by public opinion” or by government officials? Media criticism and central-local government relations in China. Modern China, 43(6): 620-645. Chou, C. C., & Teng, C. S. (2025). Diversion of public criticism and the politics of blame avoidance in China. China Information, 39(1), 30-52. Hague, Barry N., and Brian D. Loader(1999).“1999 Digital democracy: an introduction.” In Hague, Barry N., and Brian D. Loader(eds.),Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age,17-36.London: Routledge. Hansson, S. (2015). "Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis." Discourse & Society, 26(3): 297-322. Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2015). "Avoiding blame—a comprehensive framework and the A ustralian H ome I nsulation P rogram F iasco." Policy Studies Journal, 43(1): 139-161. Hinterleitner, M. (2017). "Reconciling perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour." Political Studies Review, 15(2): 243-254. Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2017). "Anticipatory and reactive forms of blame avoidance: Of foxes and lions." European political science review, 9(4): 587-606. Hood, C. (2010). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton University Press. Kriegmair, L., Rittberger, B., Zangl, B., & Heinkelmann-Wild, T. (2022). "Dolce far niente? Non-compliance and blame avoidance in the EU." West European Politics, 45(5): 1153-1174. Lieberthal, K. & Oksenberg, M. (1988). Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton University Press. Li, H., & Zhou, L. A. (2005). "Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China." Journal of public economics, 89(9-10): 1743-1762. Li, J., Ni, X., & Wang, R. (2021). "Blame avoidance in China's cadre responsibility system." The China Quarterly, 247: 681-702. Li, Y. (2013). "Fragmented authoritarianism and protest channels: a case study of resistance to privatizing a hospital." Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 42(2): 195-224. Ma, A. (2024). China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State: How Internet Regulators’ Predicament Produces Regulatees’ Autonomy. Springer Nature Singapore. Mertha, A, (2009)."“Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process." The China Quarterly,200:995–1012. Ran, R. (2017). "Understanding blame politics in China's decentralized system of environmental governance: actors, strategies and context." The China Quarterly, 231: 634-661. Ran, R. & Jian, Y.(2021). "When transparency meets accountability." China Review 21(1) : 7-36. Robertson, C. E., Pröllochs, N., Schwarzenegger, K., Pärnamets, P., Van Bavel, J. J., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023). "Negativity drives online news consumption." Nature human behaviour 7(5): 812-822. Tu, W. (2024). "Unpacking the accountability cube and its relationship with blame avoidance." Public Management Review, 26(3): 701-723. Weaver, R. K. (1986). "The politics of blame avoidance." Journal of public policy, 6(4): 371-398. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101876 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 避責行為（Blame Avoidance Behavior）理論指出，政府面對公共輿論事件壓力，時常會採取一系列逃避被公眾究責的行為。本研究旨在探討涉及中央政府程度以及輿論聲量不同的公共輿論事件之下，中國大陸政府的避責策略選擇以及用語中的情緒詞彙差異。本研究將報導中使用的避責策略論述語句分為 4 類：推卸地方政府、推卸非政府行為者、自身正當性證明，以及率先承認錯誤策略。研究長春長生疫苗造假案件、腫瘤黑幕事件、河南村鎮銀行賦紅碼事件以及北京長峰醫院火災事件，等 4 起案例，以 19 家中央官方媒體對於案件的報導語句進行內容分析和文字探勘。結果表明，面對不同特性的事件，中央官方媒體中的避責策略使用不同，但都很少使用先承認自身錯誤以博取好感的策略。在情緒詞彙傾向方面，所有事件的報導都偏向正面而平和的情緒，但同樣也因為涉及政府層級以及輿論聲量大小不同，而有不同的情緒傾向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Blame avoidance behavior theory posits that governments often engage in a series of actions to evade public accountability when faced with the pressure of public opinion. This study aimed to examine the Chinese government's choice of blame-avoidance strategies and the emotional vocabulary used in its reporting of public events with varying degrees of central government involvement and public opinion volume. This study categorized blame-avoidance strategies into four categories: blaming local governments, blaming non-governmental actors, justifying one's own legitimacy, and admitting mistakes first. The study examined four incidents: the Changchun Changsheng vaccine scandal, Dark side of cancer treatment incident, the Henan village bank red code incident, and the Beijing Changfeng Hospital fire case. Content analysis and sentiment analysis were conducted on reports from 19 central government official media. The results showed that central government official media used different blame-avoidance strategies for different incidents but rarely used the strategy of admitting their own mistakes first. In terms of emotional vocabulary, the reports on all incidents tended to be positive and peaceful, but there were also different emotional tendencies due to the different levels of government involved and the volume of public opinion. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-03-05T16:23:27Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-03-05T16:23:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝................................................................................................................. i
中文摘要........................................................................................................ ii 英文摘要.......................................................................................................iii 目次............................................................................................................... iv 圖次............................................................................................................... vi 表次.............................................................................................................. vii 第一章 緒 論............................................................................................1 第一節 研究緣起與問題意識........................................................... 1 壹、研究緣起................................................................................1 貳、問題意識................................................................................3 第二節 研究目的與主要研究問題................................................... 4 壹、研究目的................................................................................4 貳、主要研究問題....................................................................... 4 第二章 相關理論回顧與文獻探討......................................................... 10 第一節 相關理論檢討..................................................................... 10 壹、避責(BAB)理論.................................................................. 10 貳、碎裂式威權......................................................................... 12 第二節 國內外相關研究檢討......................................................... 14 壹、避責(BAB)策略.................................................................. 14 貳、碎裂式威權與 BAB............................................................17 第三章 研究設計......................................................................................19 第一節 研究途徑與研究方法......................................................... 19 壹、文本搜集............................................................................. 19 貳、策略分類............................................................................. 21 第二節 研究架構與研究假設......................................................... 24 壹、研究架構............................................................................. 24 貳、研究假設............................................................................. 24 第三節 論文結構與章節安排說明................................................. 27 第四章 避責策略種類............................................................................ .28 第一節 避責策略種類統計............................................................. 28 第二節 事件使用策略差異............................................................. 33 壹、單一事件分析..................................................................... 33 貳、事件比較............................................................................. 38 第五章 情感分析結果............................................................................ .41 第一節 情緒分數結果..................................................................... 42 第二節 結果差異分析..................................................................... 45 第六章 結 論..........................................................................................51 第一節 主要研究發現..................................................................... 51 壹、避責策略運用差異............................................................. 51 貳、報導情緒差異..................................................................... 52 參、總結......................................................................................53 第二節 後續研究建議..................................................................... 54 參考文獻......................................................................................................56 壹、中文......................................................................................56 貳、英文......................................................................................57 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 避責行為 | - |
| dc.subject | 公共輿論 | - |
| dc.subject | 中國大陸 | - |
| dc.subject | Blame Avoidance Behavior | - |
| dc.subject | public opinion | - |
| dc.subject | China | - |
| dc.title | 中國醫療衛生輿情事件中的中央政府避責行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Blame Avoidance Behaviour of Chinese Central Government in Medical Incidents | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾偉峯;鄧志松 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wei-Feng Tzeng;Chih-Sung Teng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 避責行為,公共輿論中國大陸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Blame Avoidance Behavior,public opinionChina | en |
| dc.relation.page | 58 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600305 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-09 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-03-06 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國家發展研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf | 1.27 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。