請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101845完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 高英哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ying-Jer Kao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪浩迪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hao-Ti Hung | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-05T16:07:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-06 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Jutho Haegeman, J. Ignacio Cirac, Tobias J. Osborne, Iztok Pižorn, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Verstraete. Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:070601, Aug 2011.
[2] Aditi Mitra. Quantum quench dynamics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., 9:245, Mar 2018. [3] M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field ising model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:135704, Mar 2013. [4] Markus Heyl. Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(5):054001, Apr 2018. [5] G Torlai, L Tagliacozzo, and G De Chiara. Dynamics of the entanglement spectrum in spin chains. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2014(6):P06001, Jun 2014. [6] Philipp Uhrich, Nicolò Defenu, Rouhollah Jafari, and Jad C. Halimeh. Out-of-equilibrium phase diagram of long-range superconductors. Phys. Rev. B, 101:245148, Jun 2020. [7] F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac. Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems. Advances in Physics, 57(2):143–224, 2008. [8] Ulrich Schollwöck. The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Ann. Phys., 326(1):96–192, 2011. [9] Román Orús. A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. Annals Phys., 349:117–158, 2014. [10] Pietro Silvi, Ferdinand Tschirsich, Matthias Gerster, Johannes Jünemann, Daniel Jaschke, Matteo Rizzi, and Simone Montangero. The Tensor Networks Anthology: Simulation techniques for many-body quantum lattice systems. SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, page 8, 2019. [11] Kouichi Okunishi, Tomotoshi Nishino, and Hiroshi Ueda. Developments in the Tensor Network — from Statistical Mechanics to Quantum Entanglement. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 91(6):062001, 2022. [12] Mari Carmen Bañuls. Tensor Network Algorithms: A Route Map. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys, 14(1), 2023. [13] M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner. Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains. Commun. Math. Phys., 144:443–490, 1992. [14] Stellan Östlund and Stefan Rommer. Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75:3537–3540, Nov 1995. [15] Guifré Vidal. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:147902, Oct 2003. [16] F. Verstraete, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac. Density matrix renormalization group and periodic boundary conditions: A quantum information perspective. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:227205, Nov 2004. [17] David Perez-Garcia, Frank Verstraete, Michael M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Matrix product state representations. Quantum Inf. Comput., 7:401–430, 2007. [18] F. Andraschko and J. Sirker. Dynamical quantum phase transitions and the Loschmidt echo: A transfer matrix approach. Phys. Rev. B, 89:125120, Mar 2014. [19] Pasquale Calabrese and John L. Cardy. Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory. J. Stat. Mech., 0406:P06002, 2004. [20] Tobias J. Osborne. Efficient approximation of the dynamics of one-dimensional quantum spin systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:157202, Oct 2006. [21] N. Schuch, M. M. Wolf, K. G. H. Vollbrecht, and J. I. Cirac. On entropy growth and the hardness of simulating time evolution. New J. Phys., 10(3):033032, 2008. [22] Jutho Haegeman, Christian Lubich, Ivan Oseledets, Bart Vandereycken, and Frank Verstraete. Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states. Phys. Rev. B, 94:165116, Oct 2016. [23] Laurens Vanderstraeten, Jutho Haegeman, Frank Verstraete, and Didier Poilblanc. Quasiparticle interactions in frustrated Heisenberg chains. Phys. Rev. B, 93:235108, Jun 2016. [24] Sebastian Paeckel, Thomas Köhler, Andreas Swoboda, Salvatore R. Manmana, Ulrich Schollwöck, and Claudius Hubig. Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states. Annals Phys., 411:167998, 2019. [25] C. Karrasch and D. Schuricht. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the quantum Potts chain. Phys. Rev. B, 95:075143, Feb 2017. [26] Valentin Zauner-Stauber and Jad C. Halimeh. Probing the anomalous dynamical phase in long-range quantum spin chains through Fisher-zero lines. Phys. Rev. E, 96:062118, Dec 2017. [27] Stefano De Nicola, Alexios A. Michailidis, and Maksym Serbyn. Entanglement view of dynamical quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126:040602, Jan 2021. [28] Jad C. Halimeh, Daniele Trapin, Maarten Van Damme, and Markus Heyl. Local measures of dynamical quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B, 104:075130, Aug 2021. [29] Jad C. Halimeh, Fabian Kolley, and Ian P. McCulloch. Chebyshev matrix product state approach for time evolution. Phys. Rev. B, 92:115130, Sep 2015. [30] Maarten Van Damme, Jean-Yves Desaules, Zlatko Papić, and Jad C. Halimeh. Anatomy of dynamical quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Res., 5:033090, Aug 2023. [31] Jesse J. Osborne, Johannes Knaute, Ian P. McCulloch, and Jad C. Halimeh. Meson mass sets onset time of anomalous dynamical quantum phase transitions, 2024. [32] P. Jurcevic, H. Shen, P. Hauke, C. Maier, T. Brydges, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, M. Heyl, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos. Direct observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions in an interacting many-body system. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:080501, Aug 2017. [33] Xue-Yi Guo, Chao Yang, Yu Zeng, Yi Peng, He-Kang Li, Hui Deng, Yi-Rong Jin, Shu Chen, Dongning Zheng, and Heng Fan. Observation of a dynamical quantum phase transition by a superconducting qubit simulation. Phys. Rev. Appl., 11:044080, Apr 2019. [34] Szabolcs Vajna and Balázs Dóra. Disentangling dynamical phase transitions from equilibrium phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B, 89:161105, Apr 2014. [35] Jad C. Halimeh and Valentin Zauner-Stauber. Dynamical phase diagram of quantum spin chains with long-range interactions. Phys. Rev. B, 96:134427, Oct 2017. [36] Ingo Homrighausen, Nils O. Abeling, Valentin Zauner-Stauber, and Jad C. Halimeh. Anomalous dynamical phase in quantum spin chains with long-range interactions. Phys. Rev. B, 96:104436, Sep 2017. [37] Ángel L. Corps and Armando Relaño. Dynamical and excited-state quantum phase transitions in collective systems. Phys. Rev. B, 106:024311, Jul 2022. [38] David Pérez-García, Leonardo Santilli, and Miguel Tierz. Dynamical quantum phase transitions from random matrix theory. Quantum, 8:1271, Feb 2024. [39] Mari Carmen Bañuls and Krzysztof Cichy. Review on novel methods for lattice gauge theories. Reports on Progress in Physics, 83(2):024401, Jan 2020. [40] Mari Carmen Bañuls, Rainer Blatt, Jacopo Catani, Alessio Celi, Juan Ignacio Cirac, Marcello Dalmonte, Leonardo Fallani, Karl Jansen, Maciej Lewenstein, Simone Montangero, Christine A. Muschik, Benni Reznik, Enrique Rico, Luca Tagliacozzo, Karel Van Acoleyen, Frank Verstraete, Uwe-Jens Wiese, Matthew Wingate, Jakub Zakrzewski, and Peter Zoller. Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies. Eur. Phys. J. D, 74(8):165, 2020. [41] Steven D. Bass and Erez Zohar. Quantum technologies in particle physics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 380:20210072, 2022. [42] Mari Carmen Bañuls, Krzysztof Cichy, Ying-Jer Kao, C. J. David Lin, Yu-Ping Lin, and David T. L. Tan. Phase structure of the (1+1)-dimensional massive Thirring model from matrix product states. Phys. Rev. D, 100(9):094504, 2019. [43] Markus Hauru, Glen Evenbly, Wen Wei Ho, Davide Gaiotto, and Guifre Vidal. Topological conformal defects with tensor networks. Phys. Rev. B, 94:115125, Sep 2016. [44] Q. Hu and G. Vidal. Spacetime symmetries and conformal data in the continuous multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:010603, Jul 2017. [45] Robijn Vanhove, Matthias Bal, Dominic J. Williamson, Nick Bultinck, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete. Mapping topological to conformal field theories through strange correlators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:177203, Oct 2018. [46] Boye Buyens, Jutho Haegeman, Karel Van Acoleyen, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Verstraete. Matrix product states for gauge field theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:091601, 2014. [47] Stefan Kühn, Erez Zohar, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Mari Carmen Bañuls. Non-Abelian string breaking phenomena with matrix product states. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015(7):130, 2015. [48] Boye Buyens, Jutho Haegeman, Henri Verschelde, Frank Verstraete, and Karel Van Acoleyen. Confinement and string breaking for QED2 in the Hamiltonian picture. Phys. Rev. X, 6(4):041040, 2016. [49] T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero. Real-time dynamics in U(1) lattice gauge theories with tensor networks. Phys. Rev. X, 6(1):011023, 2016. [50] Philipp Schmoll, Jan Naumann, Alexander Nietner, Jens Eisert, and Spyros Sotiriadis. Hamiltonian truncation tensor networks for quantum field theories, 2023. [51] Mari Carmen Bañuls, Krzysztof Cichy, J. Ignacio Cirac, Karl Jansen, and Hana Saito. Matrix product states for lattice field theories. PoS(LATTICE 2013), 332, 2014. [52] Sebastiano Peotta, Fredrik Brange, Aydin Deger, Teemu Ojanen, and Christian Flindt. Determination of dynamical quantum phase transitions in strongly correlated many-body systems using Loschmidt cumulants. Phys. Rev. X, 11:041018, Oct 2021. [53] Ian McCulloch. Detecting and characterising dynamical quantum phase transitions through higher moments. In APS March Meeting Abstracts, volume 2023, page B33.001, New York, Jan 2023. APS. [54] Ashok K. Das and Vishnu S. Mathur. Path integral solubility of two-dimensional models. Phys. Rev., D33:489, 1986. [55] Julian S. Schwinger. Gauge invariance and mass. 2. Phys. Rev., 128:2425–2429, 1962. [56] C. R. Hagen. New solutions of the Thirring model. Il Nuovo Cimento, B51(1):169–186, 1967. [57] A. Luther. Eigenvalue spectrum of interacting massive fermions in one-dimension. Phys. Rev., B14:2153–2159, 1976. [58] Ho N. Phien, Guifré Vidal, and Ian P. McCulloch. Infinite boundary conditions for matrix product state calculations. Phys. Rev. B, 86:245107, Dec 2012. [59] V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, M. T. Fishman, F. Verstraete, and J. Haegeman. Variational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states. Phys. Rev. B, 97:045145, Jan 2018. [60] M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, and K. Jansen. The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with matrix product states. J. High Energy Phys., 2013(11):158, Nov 2013. [61] Jutho Haegeman, J. Ignacio Cirac, Tobias J. Osborne, Iztok Pižorn, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Verstraete. Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:070601, Aug 2011. [62] D. J. Amit, Y. Y. Goldschmidt, and S. Grinstein. Renormalisation group analysis of the phase transition in the 2D Coulomb gas, sine-Gordon theory and XY-model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 13(2):585, Feb 1980. [63] David B. Kaplan, Jong-Wan Lee, Dam T. Son, and Mikhail A. Stephanov. Conformality lost. Phys. Rev. D, 80:125005, Dec 2009. [64] J. Zinn-Justin. Quantum field theory at finite temperature: An introduction, 2000. [65] J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems. J. Phys., C6:1181–1203, 1973. [66] J. M. Kosterlitz. The critical properties of the two-dimensional XY model. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 7(6):1046, Mar 1974. [67] A. LeClair, G. Mussardo, H. Saleur, and S. Skorik. Boundary energy and boundary states in integrable quantum field theories. Nuclear Physics B, 453(3):581–618, 1995. [68] W. van Saarloos and D. A. Kurtze. Location of zeros in the complex temperature plane: Absence of Lee-Yang theorem. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 17(6):1301, Apr 1984. [69] C. Karrasch and D. Schuricht. Dynamical phase transitions after quenches in nonintegrable models. Phys. Rev. B, 87:195104, May 2013. [70] Souvik Bandyopadhyay, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Amit Dutta. Observing dynamical quantum phase transitions through quasilocal string operators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126:200602, May 2021. [71] Souvik Bandyopadhyay, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Amit Dutta. Late-time critical behavior of local stringlike observables under quantum quenches. Phys. Rev. B, 107:064105, Feb 2023. [72] Ruchira V. Bhat and Soumya Bera. Distinguishing dynamical quantum criticality through local fidelity distances. Phys. Rev. B, 109:214313, Jun 2024. [73] Pengju Zhao, Jingxin Sun, Shengjie Jin, Zhongshu Hu, Dingping Li, Xiong-Jun Liu, Jörg Schmiedmayer, and Xuzong Chen. Determination of dynamical quantum phase transitions for boson systems using the Loschmidt cumulants method. Phys. Rev. A, 109:013309, Jan 2024. [74] Ryusuke Hamazaki. Exceptional dynamical quantum phase transitions in periodically driven systems. Nature Communications, 12(1):5108, Sep 2021. [75] Román Orús. Advances on tensor network theory: symmetries, fermions, entanglement, and holography. Eur. Phys. J. B, 87(11):280, Nov 2014. [76] M. B. Hastings. Solving gapped Hamiltonians locally. Phys. Rev. B, 73:085115, Feb 2006. [77] Andras Molnar, Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Approximating Gibbs states of local Hamiltonians efficiently with projected entangled pair states. Phys. Rev. B, 91:045138, Jan 2015. [78] M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field ising model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:135704, Mar 2013. [79] A. J. Bray. Theory of phase-ordering kinetics. Advances in Physics, 43(3):357–459, 1994. [80] Jiahao Yang, Xiao Wang, and Jianda Wu. Magnetic excitations in the one-dimensional heisenberg–ising model with external fields and their experimental realizations. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 56(1):013001, Jan 2023. [81] Qian-Can Chen, I-Kang Liu, Jheng-Wei Li, and Chia-Min Chung. Solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with quantic tensor trains: Ground states and nonlinear dynamics, 2025. [82] Marcel Niedermeier, Adrien Moulinas, Thibaud Louvet, Jose L. Lado, and Xavier Waintal. Solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation on multiple different scales using the quantics tensor train representation, 2025. [83] Aleix Bou-Comas, Marcin Płodzień, Luca Tagliacozzo, and Juan José García-Ripoll. Quantics tensor train for solving Gross-Pitaevskii equation, 2025. [84] Yuriel Núñez Fernández, Marc K. Ritter, Matthieu Jeannin, Jheng-Wei Li, Thomas Kloss, Thibaud Louvet, Satoshi Terasaki, Olivier Parcollet, Jan von Delft, Hiroshi Shinaoka, and Xavier Waintal. Learning tensor networks with tensor cross interpolation: New algorithms and libraries. SciPost Phys., 18:104, 2025. [85] Hiroshi Shinaoka, Markus Wallerberger, Yuta Murakami, Kosuke Nogaki, Rihito Sakurai, Philipp Werner, and Anna Kauch. Multiscale space-time ansatz for correlation functions of quantum systems based on quantics tensor trains. Phys. Rev. X, 13:021015, Apr 2023. [86] Vladimir A. Kazeev and Boris N. Khoromskij. Low-rank explicit QTT representation of the Laplace operator and its inverse. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 33(3):742–758, 2012. [87] Luigi Galati and Shijun Zheng. Nonlinear Schrödinger equations for Bose-Einstein condensates. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1562(1):50–64, Oct 2013. [88] Nis-Luca van Hülst, Pia Siegl, Paul Over, Sergio Bengoechea, Tomohiro Hashizume, Mario Guillaume Cecile, Thomas Rung, and Dieter Jaksch. Quantum-inspired tensor-network fractional-step method for incompressible flow in curvilinear coordinates, 2025. [89] Jutho Haegeman, Christian Lubich, Ivan Oseledets, Bart Vandereycken, and Frank Verstraete. Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states. arXiv:1408.5056, 2014. [90] E. Karimi, R. W. Boyd, P. de la Hoz, H. de Guise, J. Řeháček, Z. Hradil, A. Aiello, G. Leuchs, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto. Radial quantum number of Laguerre–Gauss modes. Phys. Rev. A, 89:063813, Jun 2014. [91] John Preskill. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2:79, Aug 2018. [92] M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner. Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 144(3):443–490, 1992. [93] Stellan Östlund and Stefan Rommer. Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75:3537–3540, Nov 1995. [94] Steven R. White. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:2863–2866, Nov 1992. [95] Steven R. White. Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. B, 48:10345–10356, Oct 1993. [96] Ian P. McCulloch. From density-matrix renormalization group to matrix product states. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2007(10):P10014, Oct 2007. [97] Ulrich Schollwöck. The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Annals of Physics, 326(1):96–192, 2011. January 2011 Special Issue. [98] Guifré Vidal. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:147902, Oct 2003. [99] Guifré Vidal. Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:040502, Jul 2004. [100] G. Vidal. Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:070201, Feb 2007. [101] Jutho Haegeman, Christian Lubich, Ivan Oseledets, Bart Vandereycken, and Frank Verstraete. Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states. Phys. Rev. B, 94:165116, Oct 2016. [102] Marcus Cramer, Martin B. Plenio, Steven T. Flammia, Rolando Somma, David Gross, Stephen D. Bartlett, Olivier Landon-Cardinal, David Poulin, and Yi-Kai Liu. Efficient quantum state tomography. Nature Communications, 1(1):149, Dec 2010. [103] Shi-Ju Ran. Encoding of matrix product states into quantum circuits of one- and two-qubit gates. Phys. Rev. A, 101:032310, Mar 2020. [104] F. Barratt, James Dborin, Matthias Bal, Vid Stojevic, Frank Pollmann, and A. G. Green. Parallel quantum simulation of large systems on small NISQ computers. npj Quantum Information, 7(1):79, May 2021. [105] Adam Smith, Bernhard Jobst, Andrew G. Green, and Frank Pollmann. Crossing a topological phase transition with a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Res., 4:L022020, Apr 2022. [106] Nikita Astrakhantsev, Sheng-Hsuan Lin, Frank Pollmann, and Adam Smith. Time evolution of uniform sequential circuits. Phys. Rev. Res., 5:033187, Sep 2023. [107] Francois Jamet, Connor Lenihan, Lachlan P. Lindoy, Abhishek Agarwal, Enrico Fontana, Baptiste Anselme Martin, and Ivan Rungger. Anderson impurity solver integrating tensor network methods with quantum computing, 2023. [108] Ian MacCormack, Alexey Galda, and Adam L. Lyon. Simulating large PEPS tensor networks on small quantum devices, 2021. [109] Adam Smith, M. S. Kim, Frank Pollmann, and Johannes Knolle. Simulating quantum many-body dynamics on a current digital quantum computer. npj Quantum Information, 5(1):106, Nov 2019. [110] Sheng-Hsuan Lin, Rohit Dilip, Andrew G. Green, Adam Smith, and Frank Pollmann. Real- and imaginary-time evolution with compressed quantum circuits. PRX Quantum, 2:010342, Mar 2021. [111] Niklas Mueller, Joseph A. Carolan, Andrew Connelly, Zohreh Davoudi, Eugene F. Dumitrescu, and Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz. Quantum computation of dynamical quantum phase transitions and entanglement tomography in a lattice gauge theory. PRX Quantum, 4:030323, Aug 2023. [112] Taichi Kosugi, Yusuke Nishiya, Hirofumi Nishi, and Yu-ichiro Matsushita. Imaginary-time evolution using forward and backward real-time evolution with a single ancilla: First-quantized eigensolver algorithm for quantum chemistry. Phys. Rev. Res., 4:033121, Aug 2022. [113] Chiara Leadbeater, Nathan Fitzpatrick, David Muñoz Ramo, and Alex J. W. Thom. Non-unitary Trotter circuits for imaginary time evolution. Quantum Science and Technology, 9(4):045007, Jul 2024. [114] Mario Motta, Chong Sun, Adrian T. K. Tan, Matthew J. O’Rourke, Erika Ye, Austin J. Minnich, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution. Nature Physics, 16(2):205–210, Feb 2020. [115] Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, Raphael C. Pooser, and George Siopsis. Practical quantum computation of chemical and nuclear energy levels using quantum imaginary time evolution and Lanczos algorithms. npj Quantum Information, 6(1):63, Jul 2020. [116] Niladri Gomes, Feng Zhang, Noah F. Berthusen, Cai-Zhuang Wang, Kai-Ming Ho, Peter P. Orth, and Yongxin Yao. Efficient step-merged quantum imaginary time evolution algorithm for quantum chemistry. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 16(10):6256–6266, Oct 2020. [117] Hirofumi Nishi, Taichi Kosugi, and Yu-ichiro Matsushita. Implementation of quantum imaginary-time evolution method on NISQ devices by introducing nonlocal approximation. npj Quantum Information, 7(1):85, Jun 2021. [118] Shi-Ning Sun, Mario Motta, Ruslan N. Tazhigulov, Adrian T. K. Tan, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, and Austin J. Minnich. Quantum computation of finite-temperature static and dynamical properties of spin systems using quantum imaginary time evolution. PRX Quantum, 2:010317, Feb 2021. [119] Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, George Siopsis, and Raphael C. Pooser. Scattering in the Ising model with the quantum Lanczos algorithm*. New Journal of Physics, 23(4):043033, Apr 2021. [120] Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, Eleftherios Moschandreou, and George Siopsis. Quantum imaginary-time evolution algorithm for quantum field theories with continuous variables. Phys. Rev. A, 105:012412, Jan 2022. [121] Chenfeng Cao, Zheng An, Shi-Yao Hou, D. L. Zhou, and Bei Zeng. Quantum imaginary time evolution steered by reinforcement learning. Communications Physics, 5(1):57, Mar 2022. [122] Takashi Tsuchimochi, Yoohee Ryo, Seiichiro L. Ten-no, and Kazuki Sasasako. Improved algorithms of quantum imaginary time evolution for ground and excited states of molecular systems. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 19(2):503–513, Jan 2023. [123] Swagat Kumar and Colin Michael Wilmott. Generalising quantum imaginary time evolution to solve linear partial differential equations. Scientific Reports, 14(1):20156, Aug 2024. [124] Ioannis Kolotouros, David Joseph, and Anand Kumar Narayanan. Accelerating quantum imaginary-time evolution with random measurements, 2024. [125] Colin P. Williams. Probabilistic nonunitary quantum computing. In Eric Donkor, Andrew R. Pirich, and Howard E. Brandt, editors, Quantum Information and Computation II, volume 5436 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, pages 297–306, Aug 2004. [126] Zixuan Hu, Rongxin Xia, and Sabre Kais. A quantum algorithm for evolving open quantum dynamics on quantum computing devices. Scientific Reports, 10(1):3301, Feb 2020. [127] Tong Liu, Jin-Guo Liu, and Heng Fan. Probabilistic nonunitary gate in imaginary time evolution. Quantum Information Processing, 20(6):204, Jun 2021. [128] Hirofumi Nishi, Taichi Kosugi, Yusuke Nishiya, and Yu-ichiro Matsushita. Acceleration of probabilistic imaginary-time evolution method combined with quantum amplitude amplification, 2022. [129] Anthony W. Schlimgen, Kade Head-Marsden, LeeAnn M. Sager-Smith, Prineha Narang, and David A. Mazziotti. Quantum state preparation and nonunitary evolution with diagonal operators. Phys. Rev. A, 106:022414, Aug 2022. [130] F. Turro, A. Roggero, V. Amitrano, P. Luchi, K. A. Wendt, J. L. Dubois, S. Quaglioni, and F. Pederiva. Imaginary-time propagation on a quantum chip. Phys. Rev. A, 105:022440, Feb 2022. [131] Taichi Kosugi, Hirofumi Nishi, and Yu-ichiro Matsushita. Exhaustive search for optimal molecular geometries using imaginary-time evolution on a quantum computer. npj Quantum Information, 9(1):112, Nov 2023. [132] Mariane Mangin-Brinet, Jing Zhang, Denis Lacroix, and Edgar Andres Ruiz Guzman. Efficient solution of the non-unitary time-dependent Schrödinger equation on a quantum computer with complex absorbing potential. Quantum, 8:1311, Apr 2024. [133] Hao-Nan Xie, Shi-Jie Wei, Fan Yang, Zheng-An Wang, Chi-Tong Chen, Heng Fan, and Gui-Lu Long. Probabilistic imaginary-time evolution algorithm based on nonunitary quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. A, 109:052414, May 2024. [134] Hirofumi Nishi, Taichi Kosugi, Yusuke Nishiya, and Yu-ichiro Matsushita. Quadratic acceleration of multistep probabilistic algorithms for state preparation. Phys. Rev. Res., 6:L022041, May 2024. [135] Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Sam McArdle, Xiao Yuan, and Simon C. Benjamin. Variational quantum algorithms for discovering Hamiltonian spectra. Phys. Rev. A, 99:062304, Jun 2019. [136] Sam McArdle, Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Ying Li, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution. npj Quantum Information, 5(1):75, Sep 2019. [137] Xiao Yuan, Suguru Endo, Qi Zhao, Ying Li, and Simon C. Benjamin. Theory of variational quantum simulation. Quantum, 3:191, Oct 2019. [138] David Amaro, Matthias Rosenkranz, Nathan Fitzpatrick, Koji Hirano, and Mattia Fiorentini. A case study of variational quantum algorithms for a job shop scheduling problem. EPJ Quantum Technology, 9(1):5, Feb 2022. [139] Marcello Benedetti, Mattia Fiorentini, and Michael Lubasch. Hardware-efficient variational quantum algorithms for time evolution. Phys. Rev. Res., 3:033083, Jul 2021. [140] Shi-Xin Zhang and Shuai Yin. Universal imaginary-time critical dynamics on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. B, 109:134309, Apr 2024. [141] Laurens Vanderstraeten, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete. Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states. SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, page 7, 2019. [142] Markus Heyl. Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(5):054001, Apr 2018. [143] John M. Martyn, Zane M. Rossi, Andrew K. Tan, and Isaac L. Chuang. Grand unification of quantum algorithms. PRX Quantum, 2:040203, Dec 2021. [144] V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, M. T. Fishman, F. Verstraete, and J. Haegeman. Variational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states. Phys. Rev. B, 97:045145, Jan 2018. [145] Kai-Hsin Wu, Chang-Teng Lin, Ke Hsu, Hao-Ti Hung, Manuel Schneider, Chia-Min Chung, Ying-Jer Kao, and Pochung Chen. The Cytnx library for tensor networks. SciPost Phys. Codebases, page 53, 2025. [146] Marton Kormos, Mario Collura, Gabor Takács, and Pasquale Calabrese. Real-time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model. Nature Physics, 13(3):246–249, Mar 2017. [147] S. B. Rutkevich. Energy spectrum of bound-spinons in the quantum Ising spin-chain ferromagnet. Journal of Statistical Physics, 131(5):917–939, Jun 2008. [148] Niall Robertson, Albert Akhriev, Jiri Vala, and Sergiy Zhuk. Approximate quantum compiling for quantum simulation: A tensor network based approach. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 6(3), May 2025. [149] A. B. Zamolodchikov. Integrals of motion and S-matrix of the (scaled) t = tc Ising model with magnetic field. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 04(16):4235–4248, 1989. [150] G. Delfino and G. Mussardo. The spin-spin correlation function in the two-dimensional Ising model in a magnetic field at t = tc. Nuclear Physics B, 455(3):724–758, 1995. [151] Jonas A. Kjäll, Frank Pollmann, and Joel E. Moore. Bound states and E8 symmetry effects in perturbed quantum Ising chains. Phys. Rev. B, 83:020407, Jan 2011. [152] Paolo Pietro Mazza, Gabriele Perfetto, Alessio Lerose, Mario Collura, and Andrea Gambassi. Suppression of transport in nondisordered quantum spin chains due to confined excitations. Phys. Rev. B, 99:180302, May 2019. [153] Olalla A. Castro-Alvaredo, Máté Lencsés, István M. Szécsényi, and Jacopo Viti. Entanglement oscillations near a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:230601, Jun 2020. [154] Flávia B. Ramos, Máté Lencsés, J. C. Xavier, and Rodrigo G. Pereira. Confinement and bound states of bound states in a transverse-field two-leg Ising ladder. Phys. Rev. B, 102:014426, Jul 2020. [155] Luka Pavešić, Daniel Jaschke, and Simone Montangero. Constrained dynamics and confinement in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model. Phys. Rev. B, 111:L140305, Apr 2025. [156] R. Coldea, D. A. Tennant, E. M. Wheeler, E. Wawrzynska, D. Prabhakaran, M. Telling, K. Habicht, P. Smeibidl, and K. Kiefer. Quantum criticality in an Ising chain: Experimental evidence for emergent E8 symmetry. Science, 327(5962):177–180, 2010. [157] Zhao Zhang, Kirill Amelin, Xiao Wang, Haiyuan Zou, Jiahao Yang, Urmas Nagel, Toomas Rõom, Tusharkanti Dey, Agustinus Agung Nugroho, Thomas Lorenz, Jianda Wu, and Zhe Wang. Observation of E8 particles in an Ising chain antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B, 101:220411, Jun 2020. [158] Haiyuan Zou, Yi Cui, Xiao Wang, Z. Zhang, J. Yang, G. Xu, A. Okutani, M. Hagiwara, M. Matsuda, G. Wang, Giuseppe Mussardo, K. Hódsági, M. Kormos, Zhangzhen He, S. Kimura, Rong Yu, Weiqiang Yu, Jie Ma, and Jianda Wu. E8 spectra of quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet BaCo2V2O8 under transverse field. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:077201, Aug 2021. [159] Joseph Vovrosh and Johannes Knolle. Confinement and entanglement dynamics on a digital quantum computer. Scientific Reports, 11(1):11577, Jun 2021. [160] Ali Javadi-Abhari, Matthew Treinish, Kevin Krsulich, Christopher J. Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D. Nation, Lev S. Bishop, Andrew W. Cross, Blake R. Johnson, and Jay M. Gambetta. Quantum computing with Qiskit, 2024. [161] M. Hebenstreit, D. Alsina, J. I. Latorre, and B. Kraus. Compressed quantum computation using a remote five-qubit quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A, 95:052339, May 2017. [162] Alba Cervera-Lierta. Exact Ising model simulation on a quantum computer. Quantum, 2:114, Dec 2018. [163] A. A. Zhukov, S. V. Remizov, W. V. Pogosov, and Yu. E. Lozovik. Algorithmic simulation of far-from-equilibrium dynamics using quantum computer. Quantum Information Processing, 17(9):1–26, Sep 2018. [164] Adam Smith, M. S. Kim, Frank Pollmann, and Johannes Knolle. Simulating quantum many-body dynamics on a current digital quantum computer. npj Quantum Information, 5(1):106, Nov 2019. [165] Christopher Lamb, Yicheng Tang, Robert Davis, and Ananda Roy. Ising meson spectroscopy on a noisy digital quantum simulator. Nature Communications, 15(1):5901, Jul 2024. [166] Joseph Vovrosh, Julius de Hond, Sergi Julià-Farré, Johannes Knolle, and Alexandre Dauphin. Meson spectroscopy of exotic symmetries of Ising criticality in Rydberg atom arrays, Jun 2025. [167] Isabel Nha Minh Le, Shuo Sun, and Christian B. Mendl. Riemannian quantum circuit optimization based on matrix product operators, Jan 2025. [168] John Preskill. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2:79, Aug 2018. [169] Jianda Wu, Márton Kormos, and Qimiao Si. Finite-temperature spin dynamics in a perturbed quantum critical Ising chain with an E8 symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:247201, Dec 2014. [170] Fangli Liu, Rex Lundgren, Paraj Titum, Guido Pagano, Jiehang Zhang, Christopher Monroe, and Alexey V. Gorshkov. Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long-range interacting quantum spin chains. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122:150601, Apr 2019. [171] Joseph Tindall and Dries Sels. Confinement in the transverse field Ising model on the heavy hex lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:180402, Oct 2024. [172] Kazuya Shinjo, Kazuhiro Seki, Tomonori Shirakawa, Rong-Yang Sun, and Seiji Yunoki. Unveiling clean two-dimensional discrete time quasicrystals on a digital quantum computer, Mar 2024. [173] John S. Van Dyke, Edwin Barnes, Sophia E. Economou, and Rafael I. Nepomechie. Preparing exact eigenstates of the open XXZ chain on a quantum computer. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 55(5):055301, Jan 2022. [174] B. Pozsgay, M. Mestyán, M. A. Werner, M. Kormos, G. Zaránd, and G. Takács. Correlations after quantum quenches in the XXZ spin chain: Failure of the generalized Gibbs ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:117203, Sep 2014. [175] Mari Carmen Bañuls, Krzysztof Cichy, Hao-Ti Hung, Ying-Jer Kao, C.-J. David Lin, and Amit Singh. Dynamical quantum phase transition and thermal equilibrium in the lattice Thirring model. Phys. Rev. Res., 7:023194, May 2025. [176] Ching-Tai Huang, Yu-Cheng Lin, and Ferenc Igloi. Quench dynamics of the quantum XXZ chain with staggered interactions: Exact results and simulations on digital quantum computers, 2025. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101845 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文探討了利用張量網路與量子電路來模擬量子多體系統以及求解偏微分方程（PDE）的方法。第一部分著重於在無限與有限長度格點的張量網路架構中使用時間依賴變分原理（Time-Dependent Variational Principle, TDVP）演算法，以研究自旋模型的動力學行為。我們透過將 Thirring 模型轉換為spin-lattice Hamiltonian，並進行複時間演化，探討其動態量子相變（Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions, DQPTs）。本研究建立了 DQPT 與 Fisher 零點（Fisher zeros）之間的關聯。此外，我們利用有限系統的 TDVP 方法，在 XXZ 模型中進行 quantum quench 後的模擬，觀察到隨著實時間演化而出現的 coarsening 現象。
接著，本論文探討以極座標下的Quantic Tensor Train (QTT) 表示法求解二維偏微分方程。為處理 Laplacian 算符在原點處的 singularity，我們提出一種方法，使得所有相關運算皆可轉換為矩陣乘積算符（Matrix Product Operators, MPOs）的形式。此架構使得我們能夠利用 DMRG 及 TDVP 等演算法，模擬二維簡諧振子與 Gross–Pitaevskii（GP）方程的基態與動態行為。 最後一部分則研究量子電路方法在多體量子動力學中的應用，特別是 Ising 模型。我們利用受 TDVP 啟發的參數化量子電路進行無限長度 Ising 模型的虛時間演化，將矩陣乘積態（Matrix Product States, MPS）轉換為量子電路的表示，並於實際量子硬體上執行模擬。同時，我們 cost function 與期望值的分佈進行統計分析，並結合 quantum Lanczos 演算法以提升變分最佳化的效果。此外，我們模擬具縱向與橫向磁場的 Ising 模型之實時間演化，以探討其所呈現的 E_8 對稱性。為提升量子電路實作效率，我們亦應用基於張量網路的壓縮技術，優化電路深度，並於真實量子裝置上進行驗證。 綜合而言，本論文展示了張量網路與量子電路方法在模擬複雜量子系統與求解偏微分方程中的高效性與靈活性，為量子模擬的理論研究與實際應用開啟了新的方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation explores methods for simulating quantum many-body systems and solving partial differential equations (PDEs) using tensor networks and quantum circuits. The first part focuses on the use of the Time-Dependent Variational Principle (TDVP) algorithm in both infinite- and finite-size lattice systems in tensor networks to study dynamical behavior in spin models. We investigate dynamical quantum phase transitions (DQPTs) in the Thirring and XXZ models by mapping the Thirring model to a spin-lattice Hamiltonian and performing complex-time evolution. A connection between Fisher zeros and DQPTs is established. In addition, we study the coarsening phenomenon in the XXZ model by applying finite-size TDVP following a quantum quench, revealing the emergence of coarsening behavior through real-time evolution.
Then, addresses the solution of two-dimensional partial differential equations using the Quantic Tensor Train (QTT) representation under polar coordinates. To manage the singularity at the origin of the Laplacian operator, we propose a regularization method that enables all relevant operations to be expressed as Matrix Product Operators (MPOs). This framework allows for ground state and dynamical simulations of the two-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator and the Gross–Pitaevskii (GP) equation using DMRG and TDVP algorithms. The final part investigates quantum circuit approaches to many-body dynamics, with a particular focus on the Ising model. We perform imaginary-time evolution of the infinite-size Ising model using parameterized quantum circuits inspired by TDVP, converting Matrix Product States (MPS) into circuit representations and executing simulations on real quantum hardware. Statistical analysis of cost function distributions and expectation values is conducted, and a quantum Lanczos algorithm is used to improve variational optimization. Additionally, we simulate the real-time evolution of the transverse-field Ising model with a longitudinal field to explore signatures of emergent E_8 symmetry. Tensor network-based compression techniques are applied to optimize the depth of the quantum circuit, further enhancing the efficiency of the implementation on quantum devices. Together, these studies demonstrate the effectiveness of tensor network and quantum circuit frameworks in simulating complex quantum systems and solving PDEs, paving the way for both theoretical advances and practical applications in quantum simulation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-03-05T16:07:07Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-03-05T16:07:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書i
誌謝iii 摘要vii Abstract ix List of Publications xiii Table of Contents xv List of Figures xix List of Tables xxv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and Role of TDVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2 Overview of Dissertation Topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Chapter 2 Dynamical Quantum Phase Transition of the Thirring and XXZ Models 7 2.1 Formalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.1.1 The Thirring Model as a Spin Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.1.2 Matrix Product State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1.3 Penalty Term and Matrix Product Operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.1.4 Brief Introduction of VUMPS and TDVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2 Equilibrium Phase Structure of the 1+1-dimensional Thirring Model 17 2.3 The Loschmidt Echo and the Mixed Transfer Matrix . . . . . . . . . 19 2.3.1 Quantum Quench and DQPT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.3.2 Investigation of DQPT in the Lattice Version of the Thirring Model . 23 2.3.3 DQPT and Thermalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.4 DQPTs and Finite-temperature Phase Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.4.1 Energy Threshold and the Inverse Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.5 DQPTs, Fisher Zeros, and the Effective-temperature–Time Plane . . . 35 2.5.1 Benchmark: Fisher Zeros and DQPTs In the XXZ Chain . . . . . . 35 2.5.2 Complex-time Evolution in the Thirring Model . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.5.3 Analytic Fisher Zeros in the Transverse-field Ising Chain . . . . . . 39 2.6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Chapter 3 Coarsening of the XXZ Model 45 3.1 Quench and Coarsening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.2 Coarsening of the XXZ Model in a Quantum Quench . . . . . . . . . 48 3.3 Statistical Averaging over Random Longitudinal Fields . . . . . . . . 58 Chapter 4 Solving PED Using Quantics Tensor Train and TDVP 63 4.1 QTT Representation in Cartesian Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.2 Simulation Results in the Cartesian Coordinate . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.3 QTT Representation in Polar Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.4 Singularity at the Origin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.5 MPO Representation in Polar Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 4.6 Simulation Results in Polar Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 4.6.1 Heat Equation in Polar Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.6.2 Schrödinger Equation in the Two-Dimensional Harmonic Oscillator 100 4.7 Rotating Gross–Pitaevskii Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 4.7.1 Rotating Gross–Pitaevskii Equation in Polar Coordinates . . . . . . 105 4.7.2 Increasing the QTT Resolution by Adding Tensor Sites . . . . . . . 107 4.7.2.1 Nearest-Neighbor Interpolation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 4.7.2.2 Linear Interpolation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.7.2.3 Extension to Polar Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.7.2.4 Application: Refinement in the Rotating GP Simulation 110 4.7.3 Real-Time Dynamics After a Quantum Quench . . . . . . . . . . . 111 Chapter 5 Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution 115 5.1 The Concept of the TDVP Based on Quantum Circuits . . . . . . . . 118 5.1.1 The TDVP based on uMPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 5.1.2 Mapping between uMPS and Quantum Circuits . . . . . . . . . . . 123 5.1.3 Real-Time Evolution on 1D Infinite-size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 5.2 Expand Non-unitary to Unitary Gate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 5.2.1 Expand Non-unitary to Unitary Gate Using SVD . . . . . . . . . . 126 5.2.2 The Construction of the Environment Gates . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 5.2.3 Expansion of the Imaginary-time Evolution Operator . . . . . . . . 127 5.3 Quantum Imaginary-time Evolution for Infinite Systems . . . . . . . 128 5.3.1 Two Approaches to Deal with Non-unitary Operator . . . . . . . . . 129 5.3.2 Quantum Lanczos Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 5.4 Quantum Imaginary-time Evolution for Finite System . . . . . . . . . 135 5.5 Simulation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 5.5.1 Results for 1D Infinite-size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 5.5.2 Results for 1D Finite-size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 5.6 Statistical Effects of Quantum Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 5.7 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 Chapter 6 𝐸8 Symmetry of the Ising Model:Using Quantum Circuits Simulation 155 6.1 𝐸8 Symmetry in Quantum Ising Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 6.2 Using IBMQ Quantum Real Device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 6.2.1 Evolution Gate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 6.2.2 Error Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 6.3 Riemannian Quantum Circuit Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 6.4 Masses in Frequency Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 6.5 Detail of Setting on Real Device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 6.6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 Chapter 7 Summary and Outlook 179 References 185 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 矩陣乘積態（MPS） | - |
| dc.subject | DQPT | - |
| dc.subject | Thirring 模型 | - |
| dc.subject | Coarsening | - |
| dc.subject | QTT | - |
| dc.subject | 量子運算 | - |
| dc.subject | E8 對稱 | - |
| dc.subject | MPS | - |
| dc.subject | DQPT | - |
| dc.subject | Thirring | - |
| dc.subject | Coarsening | - |
| dc.subject | QTT | - |
| dc.subject | Quantum computing | - |
| dc.subject | E8 Symmetry | - |
| dc.title | 多體動力學在張量網路與量子電路中的計算 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Simulation of Many-Body Dynamics with Tensor Networks and Quantum Circuits | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳柏中;鍾佳民;林瑜琤;黃一平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Pochung Chen;Chia-Min Chung;Yu-Cheng Lin;Yi-Ping Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 矩陣乘積態（MPS）; DQPT; Thirring 模型; Coarsening; QTT; 量子運算; E8 對稱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | MPS; DQPT; Thirring; Coarsening; QTT; Quantum computing; E8 Symmetry | en |
| dc.relation.page | 208 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600601 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-03-06 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 物理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf | 10.45 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。