請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101553完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃詩淳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Sieh-Chuen Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賴顗安 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-An Lai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-11T16:18:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-12 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-02-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、中文文獻（依作者姓名之筆畫順序） （一）書籍 郭志超、林瑤棋（編）（2023）。《閩南宗族社會》，福建人民出版社。 （二）期刊論文 王曉丹（2017）。〈司法意識與司法信賴──權威、感知與正義觀〉，《檢察新論》，21，13－23。 吳重禮（2008）。〈司法與公共支持：台灣民眾對於司法體系的比較評價〉，《台灣政治學刊》，12(2)，15－66。 侯佩君（2023）。〈雙底冊電話調查合併組合加權處理之比較分析〉，《選舉研究》，30(1)，頁43－88，doi:10.6612/tjes.202305_30(1).0002。 陳怡如、劉從葦、呂建德（2017）。〈臺灣民眾為什麼不信任司法？──一個模糊集合的分析〉。《Democracy & Governance / 民主與治理》，4(1)，頁29－67。https://doi.org/10.3966/2311505X2017020401002 黃國昌（2009）。〈法學實證研究方法初探〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，(175)，頁142－153。 黃國昌、陳恭平、林常青（2017）。〈台灣人民對法院的信任支持及觀感：以對法官判決之公正性為中心〉，《台灣政治學刊》，21(1)，頁51－112。 （三）學位論文 林詩偉（2005）。〈集體認同的建構：當代台灣客家論述的內容與脈絡分析（1987－2006）〉（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所）。 陳彥宇（2013）。〈影響台灣民眾司法信任之因素探討〉（碩士論文，國立臺北大學）。 魯永強（2007）。〈臺灣法庭外語通譯現況調查與檢討〉（碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學翻譯研究所）。 （四）研究報告 陳聰富（2002）。〈法治主義、法律文化與台灣社會變遷－以民意調查與統計資料為中心〉。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫，計畫編號：NSC 90-2414-H-002-014，臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。 （五）網路文獻 司法院（2024）。112年一般民眾對司法認知調查（AF010018）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫，2024年12月6日。https://doi.org/10.6141/TW-SRDA-AF010018-1 司法院（2024）。〈112年一般民眾對司法認知調查〉，中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫，https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/search/metadata/detail/AF010018（最後瀏覽日：2025年10月17日）。 李翰，〈二審推翻恐龍判決 性侵女童改判7年半〉，《中國時報》，2011年8月27日，https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20110827000878-260102?chdtv （最後瀏覽日：2025年12月16日）。 林長順，〈實際參審後 國民法官對司法信任度100%〉，《中央通訊社》，2025年2月1日，https://www.cna.com.tw/news/asoc/202502010048.aspx （最後瀏覽日：2025年12月16日）。 教育部（2025）。〈當前教育重大政策〉，教育部全球資訊網，https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=37E2FF8B7ACFC28B（最後瀏覽日：2026年1月2日）。 二、 英文文獻 （一）書籍 Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications. Bean, C. (2005). Is there a crisis of trust in Australia? In S. Wilson, G. Meagher, R. Gibson, D. Denemark, & M. Western (Eds.), Australian social attitudes: The first report. UNSW Press. Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. Wiley Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Allyn & Bacon. Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Basil Blackwell. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. Klöter, H. (2005). Written Taiwanese. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz. Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford University Press. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press. （二）專書論文 Braithwaite, V. (1998). Communal and exchange trust norms: Their value base and relevance to institutional trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 46–47). Russell Sage Foundation. Goodman-Delahunty, J., Tait, D., & Martschuk, N. (2020). Procedural fairness and jury satisfaction: An analysis of relational dimensions. In D. Meyerson, C. Mackenzie, & T. MacDermott (Eds.), Procedural justice and relational theory: Philosophical, empirical and legal perspectives (p. 45). Routledge. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power (pp. 35–40). Wiley. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall. （三）期刊論文 Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. Chen, S. (2010). Multilingualism in Taiwan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2010.040 Cialdini, R. B., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 357–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002041 Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265–279. Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010). Four ingredients: New recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(4), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq041 Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Howes, L. (2016). Social persuasion to develop rapport in high stakes interviews: A qualitative analysis of Asian-Pacific policing practices. Policing & Society: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 26(3), 270–290. Haggard, S., & Tiede, L. (2011). The rule of law and economic growth: Where are we? World Development, 39, 673–685. Hauser, R. M., & Warren, J. R. (1997). Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: A review, update, and critique. Sociological Methodology, 27, 177–298. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19 Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3 Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. Ruiz-Adame, M., Martínez-Rodríguez, S., & Posada-Pérez, J. A. (2023). The effect of socioeconomic factors, fear of crime and social mobilization on the evaluation of judiciary decisions. Revista Galega de Economía, 32(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.32.3.9274 Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403 Sandel, T. L. (2003). Linguistic Capital in Taiwan: The KMT’s Mandarin Language Policy and Its Perceived Impact on Language Practices of Bilingual Mandarin and Tai-gi Speakers. Language in Society, 32(4), 523–551. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4169285 Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. Sønderskov, K. M., & Dinesen, P. M. (2016). Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Political Behavior, 38, 179–202. Tsao, F. F. (1999). The Language Planning Situation in Taiwan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 20(4–5), 328–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434639908666383 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. Tyler, T. R. (2007). Procedural justice and the courts. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 44(1/2), 31–36. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 78–95. van den Bos, K., Hulst, L., Robijn, M., Romijn, S., & Wever, T. (2023). Field experiments examining trust in law: Interviewer effects on participants with lower educational backgrounds. Utrecht Law Review, 19, 1–19. Wallace, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2021). Measuring trust and confidence in courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.418 Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. （四）學位論文 Bredenoord, B. J. B. (2016). Culture and queries: Google search data as a reflection of national culture (Bachelor’s thesis). University of Twente, The Netherlands. Retrieved from https://essay.utwente.nl/fileshare/file/70141/Bredenoord_BA_BMS.pdf Mercier, K. (2024). Intranational cross-cultural adaptation of communication style on brand attitude: An exploration of communication style localization on social media to within-country cross-cultural differences in Switzerland (Master’s thesis, University of Fribourg). https://www.unifr.ch/marketing/fr/assets/public/PDF%20Travaux%20de%20Master/020824_MasterThesis_MercierKim_v.Final.pdf （五）工作論文 Campo, F., Nunziata, L., & Rocco, L. (2020). Talking business: New evidence on how language shapes economic behaviour (IZA Discussion Paper No. 13897). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://docs.iza.org/dp13897.pdf （六）國際組織／國外機關報告 Council of Europe, European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). (2019). Compilation of Venice Commission opinions and reports concerning courts and judges (Document CDL-PI(2019)008-e). Council of Europe. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-PI(2019)008-e International Consortium for Court Excellence. (2020). Global measures of court performance (3rd ed.). Secretariat for the International Consortium for Court Excellence. http://www.courtexcellence.com Rogers, J., & Godard, D. (2006). Trust and confidence in the California courts, Part II: Executive summary of methodology with survey instruments. Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts. （七）網路文獻 Burn, J. (2023). Judicial reform in Taiwan in the context of the Citizen Judges Act. Taiwan Insight. https://taiwaninsight.org/2023/03/22/judicial-reform-in-taiwan-in-the-context-of-the-citizen-judges-act/ (last visited 2026/01/07). Euroview. (2023). Taiwan begins citizen judge programme. European Chamber of Commerce Taiwan. https://euroview.ecct.com.tw/category-inside.php?id=1356 (last visited 2025/1/7). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions – 2024 results: Building trust in a complex policy environment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en (last visited 2025/12/16) Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610445429. (last visited 2025/11/06) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101553 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 進入二十一世紀後，隨著民主化的鞏固與媒體生態的開放，民眾對司法的批判焦點從「政治干預」轉向了「專業傲慢」和「與社會脫節」，「恐龍法官」這一負面標籤廣泛流行。然而，當民眾無法再透過信任來化約對未來的恐懼時，司法體系便面臨正當性的崩塌。為了解「部分參與國民法官審判之民眾對於司法信任的提升」是否能代表整體社會的信任轉向，教育程度、法律知識與語言習慣的差異是否會對法官信任產生不同的影響，本研究提出了由教育程度到司法認知程度，進而影響法官信任的假設，並推論使用語言對於司法認知程度到法官信任之關聯的調節效果。使用司法院「112年一般民眾對司法認知調查」中之4858份樣本進行分析，研究結果支持了司法認知程度作為教育程度到法官信任的中介機制，亦發現使用語言存在與研究假設相異的調節效果，且另外針對年齡的部分進行額外分析。最後，本研究對結果進行討論，並說明研究貢獻與研究限制，提出實務建議及未來研究方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, with the consolidation of democracy and the liberalization of the media environment, public criticism of the judiciary in Taiwan has shifted from concerns over political interference to accusations of professional arrogance and disconnection from society. The widespread use of the derogatory label “dinosaur judges” has become a symbolic manifestation of this transformation. When citizens can no longer rely on trust to reduce uncertainty about the future, the judiciary faces a crisis of legitimacy.
To examine whether the increased judicial trust observed among citizens who participate in lay judge trials can be generalized to society as a whole, and to explore whether differences in educational attainment, legal knowledge, and language use exert distinct effects on trust in judges, this study proposes a theoretical model in which education influences trust in judges through judicial cognition, while language use moderates the relationship between judicial cognition and trust in judges. Using 4,858 observations from the Judicial Yuan’s The General Public Survey on Judicial Cognition of 2023, the empirical results support judicial cognition as a mediating mechanism between education level and trust in judges. The findings further reveal a moderating effect of language use that diverges from the original research hypothesis. Additional analyses are also conducted with respect to age differences. Finally, this study discusses the theoretical and practical implications of the findings, outlines its research limitations, and proposes directions for future research. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-11T16:18:40Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-02-11T16:18:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
謝辭 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 iv 圖次 vi 表次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 司法信任 9 第二節 由教育程度到法官信任 13 第三節 司法認知程度之中介機制 18 第四節 使用語言之調節效果 22 第三章 研究方法 29 第一節 資料來源 29 第二節 研究對象 33 第四章 研究結果 37 第一節 描述性統計及相關性分析 37 第二節 假設驗證 40 第三節 額外分析 46 第五章 分析與討論 52 第一節 研究討論與主要結論 52 第二節 研究建議 59 第三節 研究限制 62 第四節 未來實務建議與研究方向 64 第六章 結論 71 參考文獻 73 附錄一 83 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 司法信任 | - |
| dc.subject | 教育程度 | - |
| dc.subject | 司法認知程度 | - |
| dc.subject | 法官信任 | - |
| dc.subject | 使用語言 | - |
| dc.subject | judicial trust | - |
| dc.subject | educational attainment | - |
| dc.subject | judicial cognition | - |
| dc.subject | trust in judges | - |
| dc.subject | language use | - |
| dc.title | 從教育程度到法官信任：司法認知程度的中介效果與使用語言的調節效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From Educational Attainment to Trust in Judges: The Mediating Role of Judicial Cognition and the Moderating Effect of Language Use | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王曉丹;趙儀珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hsiao-Tan Wang;Yee-San Teoh | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 司法信任,教育程度司法認知程度法官信任使用語言 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | judicial trust,educational attainmentjudicial cognitiontrust in judgeslanguage use | en |
| dc.relation.page | 96 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600480 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-04 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 科際整合法律學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 科際整合法律學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.68 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。