Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 醫學工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101543
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor趙福杉zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorFu-Shan Jawen
dc.contributor.author謝見杰zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChien-Chieh Hsiehen
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-11T16:14:05Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-12-
dc.date.copyright2026-02-11-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-02-03-
dc.identifier.citation1.Hsieh CC, Ting MJ, Chang CT, Tsai KC, Huang YY, Jaw FS, et al. Is the shock index associated with adverse outcomes among geriatric patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department triage? Int J Gerontol. 2023;17(3):177–182.
2. Hsieh CC, Liu CY, Tsai KC, Jaw FS, Chen J. The hypoxia-age-shock index at triage to predict the outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2023;65:65–70.
3. Ting MJ, Hsieh CC, Fan CM, Sim SS, Jaw FS, Chen PC. Machine learning-enhanced hypoxia-age-shock index for predicting mortality in adult patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: a retrospective single-center cohort study. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2025; doi:10.1002/hkj2.70047.
4. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
5. Wu JT, Leung K, Bushman M, et al. Estimating clinical severity of COVID-19 from the transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China. Nat Med. 2020;26:506–510. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0822-7.
6. Agnieszka NP, Salwan RA, Lukasz MK, et al. COVID 19- Clinical picture in the elderly population: A qualitative systematic review. Aging Dis. 2020;11:988–1008. doi:10.14336/AD.2020.062052.
7. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:934–943. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994.
8. Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1775–1776. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4683.
9. Singer AJ, Morley EJ, Meyers K, et al. Cohort of four thousand four hundred four persons under investigation for COVID-19 in a New York hospital and predictors of ICU care and ventilation. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76:394–404. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.05.011.
10. Liu K, Chen Y, Lin R, Han K. Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: a comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J Infect. 2020;80:e14–e18. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005.
11. Liu Y, Mao B, Liang S, et al. Association between age and clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19. Eur Respir J. 2020;55:2001112. doi:10.1183/13993003.01112-2020.
12. Doanay F, Elkonca F, Seyhan AU, Yilmaz E, Batrel A, Ak R. Shock index as a predictor of mortality among the COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;40:106–109. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.053.
13. van Rensen IHT, Hensgens KRC, Lekx AW, et al. Early detection of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at high risk of clinical deterioration: Utility of emergency department shock index. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;49:76–79. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.049.
14. Allgöwer M, Burri C. Shock index. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967;92:1947–1950. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1106070.
15. Al Jalbout N, Balhara KS, Hamade B, Hsieh YH, Kelen GD, Bayram JD. Shock index as a predictor of hospital admission and inpatient mortality in a US national database of emergency departments. Emerg Med J. 2019;36:293–297. doi:10.1136/emermed-2018-208002.
16. Althunayyan SM, Alsofayan YM, Khan AA. Shock index and modified shock index as triage screening tools for sepsis. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12:822–826. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2019.05.002.
17. Sankaran P, Kamath AV, Tariq SM, et al. Are shock index and adjusted shock index useful in predicting mortality and length of stay in community-acquired pneumonia? Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22:282–285. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2010.12.009. 18. Hollenberg SM, Safi L, Parrillo JE, et al. Hemodynamic profiles of shock in patients with COVID-19. Am J Cardiol. 2021;153:135–139. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.029.
19. Sun B, Wang H, Lv J, Pei H, Bai Z. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients complicated with hypotension and hypoxemia: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:753035. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.753035. 20. Qi J, Ding L, Bao L, Chen D. The ratio of shock index to pulse oxygen saturation predicting mortality of emergency trauma patients. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236094. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236094.
21. Hori T, Aihara K, Watanabe T, et al. The respiratory adjusted shock index at admission is a valuable predictor of in-hospital outcomes for elderly emergency patients with medical diseases at a Japanese community general hospital. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16):4866. doi:10.3390/jcm13164866.
22. Hsieh CC, Jaw FS, Hsieh CY, Yu CJ. Prehospital age-shock index and outcomes among patients with COVID-19 disease. Am J Emerg Med. 2023;66:171.
23. Zhang JH, Fang YT, Hsieh CY, Jaw FS, Hsieh CC. Utility of emergency department triage tools in predicting the outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;80:209.
24. Hsu JY, Komine K, Jaw FS, Hsieh CC. Reader comment regarding delta shock index in the emergency department as a predictor of clinical outcomes in traumatic injury. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;92:187–188.
25. Hsieh CC, Jaw FS, Hsu CT, Hsieh CC, Chen HW. Predicting severe outcomes in pediatric trauma patients: shock index pediatric age-adjusted. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;87:132–133.
26. Chen P-S, Hsieh C-Y, Jaw F-S, Chen H-K, Hsi K-Y, Chang H-P. The hypoxia-age-shock index at triage is a useful and rapid tool. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;83:154–155. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.010.
27. Oh S, Lee K. The new combination of oxygen saturation with age shock index predicts the outcome of COVID-19 pneumonia. SAGE Open Med. 2023;11:20503121231203683. doi:10.1177/20503121231203683.
28. Chien YT, Hsieh CC, Hsieh CY, Jaw FS, Chang HP. HEART score with the GPT-4 large language model. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;S0735-6757(25)00349-3.
29. Huang HH, Hsieh CC, Jaw FS, Yeh CM. Reassessing risk stratification in the ED: HEART, HET, SVEAT, and the emerging role of HASI. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;96:278–279. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.06.064.
30. Sarıdaş A, Aydin ÖF. SHAP analysis and comparative performance of the HEART, HET, and SVEAT scores in 30-day MACE prediction. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;95:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.007.
31. Aziz F, Malek S, Ibrahim KS, et al. Short- and long-term mortality prediction after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Asians: a machine learning approach. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0254894. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254894.
32. Zhang S, Hu Z, Ye L, Zheng Y. Application of logistic regression and decision tree analysis in prediction of acute myocardial infarction events. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019;48(6):594–602. doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.12.02.
33. Achmad BF, Roan J-N, Wang C-H, Tsai M-L, Wang S-T, Chen H-M. Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a machine learning approach. Heart Lung. 2026;75:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.08.006.
34. Yu M-Y, Yoo H-Y, Han G-I, Kim E-J, Son Y-J. Comparing the performance of machine learning models and conventional risk scores for predicting major adverse cardiovascular cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e76215. doi:10.2196/76215.
35. Boeddinghaus J, Doudesis D, Lopez-Ayala P, et al. Machine learning for myocardial infarction compared with guideline-recommended diagnostic pathways. Circulation. 2024;149(14):1090–1101. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066917.
36. Öztekin A, Özyılmaz B. A machine learning based death risk analysis and prediction of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Comput Biol Med. 2025;188:109839. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109839.
37. Deng L, Zhao X, Su X, Zhou M, Huang D, Zeng X. Machine learning to predict no reflow and in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction that underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22:109. doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01853-2.
38. Lee W, Lee J, Woo SI, Choi SH, Bae JW, Jung S, Jeong MH, Lee WK. Machine learning enhances the performance of short and long-term mortality prediction model in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12886. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92362-1.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101543-
dc.description.abstract急診分流須在極短時間內進行準確的風險分層,以最佳化醫療資源配置並改善病人預後,尤其在重症病人大量湧入時更顯重要。休克指數(shock index, SI)及年齡-休克指數(age-shock index, ASI)為臨床上常用之簡易血流動力學指標,廣泛應用於急診分流;然而,其預後預測能力受限於未納入氧合狀態,而氧合不良為不良臨床結局的重要決定因子。本論文旨在以缺氧-年齡-休克指數(hypoxia-age-shock index, HASI)為核心,建構、驗證並延伸一套機器學習輔助之急診分流預後評估架構,適用於不同急診照護族群。
本整合性研究包含三項於急診情境中進行之回溯性世代研究。第一項研究探討 SI 與 ASI 於老年 COVID-19 病患中的預後效用,評估其與加護病房(ICU)收治、氣管內插管及死亡率之關聯性。第二項研究則在前述基礎上,提出將血氧飽和度(SpO₂)納入 ASI 的新型綜合指標 HASI,並於急診分流時比較 HASI、SI 與 ASI 對 COVID-19 病患不良臨床結局之預測能力。第三項研究將 HASI 的應用延伸至另一高風險急診族群,接受初級經皮冠狀動脈介入治療之 ST 段上升型心肌梗塞(STEMI)成人病患,並進一步結合以急診分流變項訓練之機器學習模型,以提升預測效能。模型鑑別力以受試者操作特徵曲線下面積(area under the curve, AUC)評估,並透過 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)進行模型可解釋性分析。
於老年 COVID-19 病患中,SI 與 ASI 對 ICU 收治、氣管內插管及死亡率皆展現可接受之鑑別能力,其中 ASI 在死亡率預測上顯著優於 SI。將缺氧狀態納入後之 HASI,其預測效能優於 SI 與 ASI,特別是在 ICU 收治與氣管內插管之預測上表現更為突出,並同時提升死亡率預測之敏感度。於 STEMI 病患族群中,HASI 亦一致優於 SI 與 ASI 於院內死亡及緊急插管之預測,證實其預測效用不侷限於感染性疾病族群。機器學習模型,尤其為樹狀結構演算法,在死亡率預測上顯著提升整體表現,惟對插管事件之預測改善幅度有限。可解釋性分析顯示,SpO₂ 為死亡率預測中最具影響力之變項,突顯氧合狀態在早期風險分層中的關鍵角色。
本論文呈現急診分流預後評估工具由傳統血流動力學指標,逐步發展為納入氧合調整之綜合指數,並進一步結合機器學習模型的演進歷程。HASI 為一項簡便、具高度可解釋性且穩健之工具,能有效於急診早期辨識高風險病患,適用於多元急診族群。雖然機器學習方法可進一步提升死亡率預測能力,HASI 仍保有臨床實用性與透明度,具備納入常規急診分流流程之可行性,有助於即時臨床決策及精準化醫療資源配置。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractEmergency department (ED) triage requires rapid, accurate risk stratification to optimize resource allocation and improve patient outcomes, particularly during surges of critically ill patients. The shock index (SI) and age-shock index (ASI) are simple hemodynamic tools widely used at triage; however, their prognostic performance is limited by the absence of oxygenation status, a key determinant of adverse outcomes. This dissertation aimed to develop, validate, and extend a machine learning–assisted triage framework centered on the hypoxia-age-shock index (HASI) for emergency care populations.
This integrated research program consisted of three retrospective cohort studies conducted in emergency settings. The first study evaluated the prognostic utility of SI and ASI in geriatric patients with COVID-19, assessing their associations with intensive care unit (ICU) admission, endotracheal intubation, and mortality. Building upon these findings, the second study introduced HASI, a novel composite index incorporating oxygen saturation (SpO₂) into ASI, and compared its predictive performance with SI and ASI for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients at triage. The third study extended the application of HASI to a different high-risk emergency population, adult patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and further enhanced prediction using machine learning (ML) models trained on triage variables. Discriminatory performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and model interpretability was explored using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
In geriatric patients with COVID-19, both SI and ASI demonstrated acceptable discrimination for ICU admission, intubation, and mortality, with ASI significantly outperforming SI in mortality prediction. The incorporation of hypoxia into the index (HASI) resulted in superior predictive performance compared with both SI and ASI, particularly for ICU admission and endotracheal intubation, while also improving sensitivity for mortality prediction. When applied to patients with STEMI, HASI consistently outperformed SI and ASI in predicting in-hospital mortality and emergency intubation, confirming its generalizability beyond infectious disease contexts. ML models, especially tree-based algorithms, markedly enhanced mortality prediction; however, gains for intubation prediction were modest. Explainability analyses highlighted SpO₂ as the most influential predictor of mortality, underscoring the critical role of oxygenation in early risk stratification.
This dissertation demonstrates a progressive evolution from traditional hemodynamic indices to an oxygenation-adjusted composite index and ultimately to machine learning–enhanced prognostic models for ED triage. HASI represents a simple, interpretable, and robust tool for early identification of high-risk patients across diverse emergency populations. While ML approaches further improve mortality prediction, HASI remains clinically practical and transparent, supporting its integration into routine emergency triage to facilitate timely decision-making and precision-guided resource allocation.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-11T16:14:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-02-11T16:14:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 IV
Table of Contents VII
List of Tables IX
List of Figures X
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods 7
2.1 Study Design and Setting 7
2.2 Study Population and Patient Selection 7
2.3 Data Collection and Variables 9
2.4 Triage Index Definitions 9
2.5 Machine Learning Model Development 10
2.6 Model Performance Evaluation and Interpretability 11
2.7 Statistical Analysis 11
2.8 Ethical Considerations 12
Chapter 3. Results 14
3.1 Study Populations and Baseline Characteristics 14
3.2 Performance of Traditional Shock Indices in COVID-19 15
3.3 Incremental Value of HASI in COVID-19 Triage 16
3.4 External Extension of HASI to STEMI 17
3.5 Machine Learning–Based Risk Prediction in STEMI 17
3.6 Model Explainability and Key Predictors 18
3.7 Summary of Integrated Findings 19
Chapter 4. Discussion 37
4.1 Principal Findings 37
4.2 Rationale for Oxygen-Enriched Shock Indices 37
4.3 Generalizability Across Emergency Populations 39
4.4 Machine Learning–Assisted Triage: Added Value and Boundaries 40
4.5 Interpretability and Physiological Insight 41
4.6 Clinical Implications 41
4.7 Strengths and Limitations 42
4.8 Future Directions 44
Chapter 5. Conclusions 45
Chapter 6. Contributions 47
References 51
Appendix 58
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject機器學習-
dc.subject急診分流-
dc.subject缺氧-年齡-休克指數-
dc.subject風險分層-
dc.subject預後模型-
dc.subjectMachine learning-
dc.subjectEmergency department triage-
dc.subjectHypoxia-age-shock index-
dc.subjectRisk stratification-
dc.subjectPrognostic model-
dc.title機器學習輔助急診分流:以缺氧-年齡-休克指數為基礎之急診族群預後模型的建構與驗證zh_TW
dc.titleMachine learning assisted triage in the emergency department: Development and validation of a prognostic model based on the HASI index for emergency care populationsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear114-1-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林恆甫;張仲達;張智銘;謝建興zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHeng-Fu Lin;Chung-Ta Chang;Chih-Ming Chang;Jiann-Shing Shiehen
dc.subject.keyword機器學習,急診分流缺氧-年齡-休克指數風險分層預後模型zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMachine learning,Emergency department triageHypoxia-age-shock indexRisk stratificationPrognostic modelen
dc.relation.page63-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202600403-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2026-02-04-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept醫學工程學系-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
顯示於系所單位:醫學工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-114-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
989.94 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved