請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101514完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳彥仰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Mike Y. Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 呂品君 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Pin-Chun Lu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-04T16:23:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-02-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-17 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] P. Abtahi, M. Gonzalez-Franco, E. Ofek, and A. Steed. I’m a giant: Walking in large virtual environments at high speed gains. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’19, page 1–13, New York, NY, USA, 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.
[2] U. Almqvist and A. Sjörs Dahlman. Validation of MobileMe–a psychophysiological recording system–from a motion sickness perspective. PhD thesis, Linköping University, 04 2006. [3] R. Banerjee. Sharpest curve on metro line, 2011. [4] J. E. Bos, S. C. de Vries, M. L. van Emmerik, and E. L. Groen. The effect of internal and external fields of view on visually induced motion sickness. Applied Ergonomics, 41(4):516–521, 2010. [5] G. Bruder, V. Interrante, L. Phillips, and F. Steinicke. Redirecting walking and driving for natural navigation in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(4):538–545, 2012. [6] G. Bruder, V. Interrante, L. Phillips, and F. Steinicke. Redirecting walking and driving for natural navigation in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(4):538–545, 2012. [7] G. Bruder, V. Interrante, L. Phillips, and F. Steinicke. Redirecting walking and driving for natural navigation in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(4):538–545, Apr. 2012. [8] P.-Y. Chen, C.-Y. Tsai, W.-H. Wang, C.-J. Lai, C.-A. Fan, S. C. Lin, C.-C. Chi, and M. Y. Chen. Aircharge: Amplifying ungrounded impact force by accumulating air propulsion momentum. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. [9] H.-j. Cho and G. J. Kim. Roadvr: Mitigating the effect of vection and sickness by distortion of pathways for in-car virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST ’20, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. [10] I. Evangelidis. Task sensitivity and noise: How mechanical properties of preference elicitation tasks account for differences in preferences across tasks., May 2023. [11] B. Games. Epic roller coasters, 2023. [12] M.-C. Games. Subway sprinters, 2023. [13] GateKeeper. Winged roller coaster fact sheet, 2012. [14] B. G. Glaser. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4):436–445, 1965. [15] J. F. Golding. Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness. Brain Research Bulletin, 47(5):507–516, Nov. 1998. [16] T. Grechkin, J. Thomas, M. Azmandian, M. Bolas, and E. Suma. Revisiting detection thresholds for redirected walking: Combining translation and curvature gains. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, SAP ’16, page 113–120, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery. [17] J. Haeling, C. Winkler, S. Leenders, D. Keßelheim, A. Hildebrand, and M. Necker. In-car 6-dof mixed reality for rear-seat and co-driver entertainment. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pages 757–758, New York, NY, USA, 2018. IEEE. [18] P. Hock, S. Benedikter, J. Gugenheimer, and E. Rukzio. Carvr: Enabling in-car virtual reality entertainment. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, page 4034–4044, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery. [19] holoride. Adding thrill to every ride | holoride, 2023. [20] Y. Hoshikawa, K. Fujita, K. Takashima, M. Fjeld, and Y. Kitamura. Redirecteddoors: Redirection while opening doors in virtual reality. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pages 464–473, New York, NY, USA, 2022. IEEE. [21] A. Inc. Apple vision pro - apple. https://www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/, 2024. (Accessed on 02/22/2024). [22] Y. Ishikawa, K. Tagawa, and H. Touyama. Alternative methods of translational gains by viewpoint manipulation in the pitch direction. In 2022 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), pages 281–286, New York, USA, 2022. IEEE. [23] L. A. Jones and H. Z. Tan. Application of psychophysical techniques to haptic research. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 6(3):268–284, 2013. [24] B.-C. Ke, M.-H. Li, Y. Chen, C.-Y. Cheng, C.-J. Chang, Y.-F. Li, S.-Y. Wang, C. Fang, and M. Y. Chen. Turnahead: Designing 3-dof rotational haptic cues to improve first-person viewing (fpv) experiences. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. [25] B. Keshavarz and H. Hecht. Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness. Hum Factors, 53(4):415–426, Aug 2011. [26] B. Keshavarz, B. E. Riecke, L. J. Hettinger, and J. L. Campos. Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1–11, Apr. 2015. [27] E. Langbehn, P. Lubos, G. Bruder, and F. Steinicke. Bending the curve: Sensitivity to bending of curved paths and application in room-scale vr. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(4):1389–1398, 2017. [28] J. Li, A. Mayer, F. Müller, A. Matviienko, and A. Butz. Location-aware virtual reality for situational awareness on the road. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, SUI ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. [29] P.-C. Lu, C.-W. Wang, Y. L. Hsu, A. Lopez, C.-Y. Tsai, C.-J. Chang, W. T. M. Tan, L.-C. Lu, and M. Y. Chen. Veer: Exploring the feasibility of deliberately designing vr motion that diverges from mundane, everyday physical motion to create more entertaining vr experiences. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’24, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. [30] K. Matsumoto, Y. Ban, T. Narumi, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose. Curvature manipulation techniques in redirection using haptic cues. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pages 105–108, New York, NY, USA, 2016. IEEE. [31] K. Matsumoto, Y. Ban, T. Narumi, Y. Yanase, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose. Unlimited corridor: Redirected walking techniques using visuo-haptic interaction. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Emerging Technologies, SIGGRAPH ’16, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery. [32] K. Matsumoto, T. Narumi, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose. Walking uphill and downhill: Redirected walking in the vertical direction. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Posters, SIGGRAPH ’17, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery. [33] A. Matviienko, F. Müller, M. Zickler, L. A. Gasche, J. Abels, T. Steinert, and M. Mühlhäuser. Reducing virtual reality sickness for cyclists in vr bicycle simulators. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’22, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. [34] M. McGill, A. Ng, and S. Brewster. I am the passenger: How visual motion cues can influence sickness for in-car vr. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, page 5655–5668, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery. [35] D. Medeiros, G. Wilson, M. Mcgill, and S. A. Brewster. The benefits of passive haptics and perceptual manipulation for extended reality interactions in constrained passenger spaces. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. [36] A. Nguyen, Y. Rothacher, E. Efthymiou, B. Lenggenhager, P. Brugger, L. Imbach, and A. Kunz. Effect of cognitive load on curvature redirected walking thresholds. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST ’20, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. [37] Nintendo. New pokemon snap | official website, 2023. [38] P. E. Paredes, S. Balters, K. Qian, E. L. Murnane, F. Ordóñez, W. Ju, and J. A. Landay. Driving with the fishes: Towards calming and mindful virtual reality experiences for the car. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2(4), Dec. 2018. [39] S. Razzaque, Z. Kohn, and M. C. Whitton. Redirected Walking. In Eurographics 2001 - Short Presentations, pages 1–6, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2001. Eurographics Association. [40] L. Rebenitsch and C. Owen. Individual variation in susceptibility to cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’14, page 309–317, New York, NY, USA, 2014. Association for Computing Machinery. [41] F. H. A. Research and Technology. Self-enforcing roadways: A guidance report, 2018. [42] M. Rietzler, J. Gugenheimer, T. Hirzle, M. Deubzer, E. Langbehn, and E. Rukzio. Rethinking redirected walking: On the use of curvature gains beyond perceptual limitations and revisiting bending gains. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 115–122, New York, USA, 2018. IEEE. [43] L. H. Robert Rosenthal, Harris Cooper. Parametric measures of effect size. In The handbook of research synthesis 621, page 231–244, New York, 1994. Russell Sage Foundation. [44] K. S. B. Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane and M. G. Lilienthal. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3):203–220, 1993. [45] T. Schmelter, L. Hernadi, M. A. Störmer, F. Steinicke, and K. Hildebrand. Interaction based redirected walking. Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech., 4(1), Apr. 2021. [46] P. Schmitz, J. Hildebrandt, A. C. Valdez, L. Kobbelt, and M. Ziefle. You spin my head right round: Threshold of limited immersion for rotation gains in redirected walking. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4):1623–1632, 2018. [47] C. B. Sinnott, P. A. Hausamann, and P. R. MacNeilage. Natural statistics of human head orientation constrain models of vestibular processing. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Apr. 2023. [48] F. Soyka, E. Kokkinara, M. Leyrer, H. Buelthoff, M. Slater, and B. Mohler. Turbulent motions cannot shake vr. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pages 33–40, New York, NY, USA, 2015. IEEE. [49] Steam. On-rail shooters category, 2023. [50] I. STUDIOS. Temple run vr, 2023. [51] E. A. Suma, M. Azmandian, T. Grechkin, T. Phan, and M. Bolas. Making small spaces feel large: Infinite walking in virtual reality. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 Emerging Technologies, SIGGRAPH ’15, New York, NY, USA, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery. [52] K. Suri and T. K. Clark. Human vestibular perceptual thresholds for pitch tilt are slightly worse than for roll tilt across a range of frequencies. Experimental Brain Research, 238(6):1499–1509, May 2020. [53] J. Vos, H. Farah, and M. Hagenzieker. Speed behaviour upon approaching freeway curves. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 159:106276, 2021. [54] N. L. Williams and T. C. Peck. Estimation of rotation gain thresholds considering fov, gender, and distractors. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(11):3158–3168, 2019. [55] T. Yamamoto, J. Shimatani, I. Ohashi, K. Matsumoto, T. Narumi, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose. Mobius walker: Pitch and roll redirected walking. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Emerging Technologies. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101514 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討在虛擬實境（VR）中，如何設計與使用者真實動態不同的運動路徑，並將日常交通移動（如地鐵、火車、汽車）轉化為更具娛樂性的 VR 體驗。此概念與過去多強調 VR 運動路徑與車輛物理運動精確同步的 In-Car VR 研究有所不同。本研究的主要目標在於瞭解使用者在左右轉向（yaw）與上下俯仰（pitch）時，對不同轉向速率與方向的喜好，以及探討在加速、巡航與減速三個階段中偏好的動態感知體驗。為此，我們首先進行了一項感知性研究（n=24），於捷運列車的直線行駛情境中進行 VR 動態體驗評估（n=18）。結果顯示，參與者偏好較高的轉向速率設計，並且在加速階段偏好向上俯仰、減速階段則偏好向下俯仰的動態體驗。儘管轉向設計可能降低部分舒適度，卻能顯著提升沉浸感（p<.01）與娛樂性（p<.001），進而增進整體體驗；在綜合舒適度考量後，89% 的參與者仍表示偏好包含此轉向設計的 VR 動態體驗。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper explores the feasibility of deliberately designing VR motion that diverges from users’ physical movements to turn mundane, everyday transportation motion (e.g., metros, trains, and cars) into more entertaining VR motion experiences, in contrast to prior car-based VR approaches that synchronize VR motion to physical car movement exactly. To gain insight into users’ preferences for veering rate and veering direction for turning (left/right) and pitching (up/down) during the three phases of acceleration (accelerating, cruising, and decelerating), we conducted a formative, perceptual study (n=24) followed by a VR experience evaluation (n=18), all conducted on metro trains moving in a mundane, straight-line motion. Results showed that participants preferred relatively high veering rates, and preferred pitching upward during acceleration and downward during deceleration. Furthermore, while veering decreased comfort as expected, it significantly enhanced immersion (p<.01) and entertainment (p<.001) and the overall experience, with comfort being considered, was preferred by 89% of participants. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-04T16:23:42Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-02-04T16:23:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 .............................................................. ii
摘要 .............................................................. iv Abstract ........................................................... v 1 Introduction ..................................................... 1 2 Related Work .................................................. 5 2.1 Redirecting Physical Paths in VR ................. 5 2.2 In-Car VR Experience ................................ 6 3 Formative, Veering Preference User Study ......... 8 3.1 Study Design .............................................. 8 3.1.1 Physical Motion .................................... 9 3.1.2 Safety and VR Sickness .......................... 9 3.1.3 Veering Directions .............................. 10 3.1.4 Veering Rate ..................................... 10 3.1.5 Veering Paths in VR 360 ...................... 12 3.2 Study Procedure ...................................... 13 3.3 Participants .............................................. 14 3.4 Quantitative Results ................................ 15 3.4.1 Veering Rate Preference ..................... 15 3.4.2 Veering Direction Preference ............... 15 3.4.3 VR Sickness ..................................... 16 3.5 Qualitative Feedback ............................... 17 3.5.1 Veering Rate Preference ..................... 17 3.5.2 Veering Direction Preference ............... 17 4 Summative User Experience Evaluation Study ......... 19 4.1 Study Design .............................................. 19 4.1.1 Physical Motion .................................... 20 4.1.2 VR 360 Motion Experience Design ........ 20 4.2 Study Procedure ...................................... 21 4.3 Participants .............................................. 22 4.4 Quantitative Results ................................ 22 4.4.1 Physical Motion with vs. without Veering ......... 22 4.4.2 Veering with vs. without Mundane, Physical Motion .... 23 4.4.3 VR Sickness ..................................... 23 4.5 Qualitative Feedback ............................... 24 4.5.1 Physical Motion with vs. without Veering ......... 24 4.5.2 Veering with vs. without Mundane, Physical Motion .... 24 5 Discussion, Limitation, and Future Work .......... 26 5.1 Personalized Veering Design ....................... 26 5.2 Example Uses ......................................... 26 5.2.1 Fully Passive VR Experience ................ 27 5.2.2 Passive VR Motions with Active Tasks ..... 27 5.2.3 Active VR Motion Experiences .............. 28 5.3 Limitations and Future Work ...................... 28 5.3.1 Additional Vehicle and Transportation .... 28 5.3.2 User Posture and Interaction ............... 28 5.3.3 Safety and Awareness ....................... 29 6 Conclusion ................................................... 31 Bibliography .................................................. 33 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 使用者體驗設計 | - |
| dc.subject | 虛擬實境 | - |
| dc.subject | 運動感知 | - |
| dc.subject | 機會式觸覺/機遇性觸覺 | - |
| dc.subject | User Experience Design | - |
| dc.subject | Virtual/Augmented Reality | - |
| dc.subject | Motion Sensation | - |
| dc.subject | Opportunistic Haptic | - |
| dc.subject | Human-centered computing | - |
| dc.title | VeeR: 設計有別於真實動態的 VR 動態路徑，創造更具娛樂性的 VR 體驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | VeeR: Deliberately Designing VR Motion that Diverges from Physical Motion to Create More Entertaining Experiences | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳炳宇;鄭龍磻;余能豪;蔡欣叡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Bing-Yu Chen;Lung-Pan Cheng;Neng-Hao Yu ;Hsin-Ruey Tsai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 使用者體驗設計,虛擬實境運動感知機會式觸覺/機遇性觸覺 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | User Experience Design,Virtual/Augmented RealityMotion SensationOpportunistic HapticHuman-centered computing | en |
| dc.relation.page | 39 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500719 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-17 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊網路與多媒體研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-02-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊網路與多媒體研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 7.96 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。