請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101509完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳家麟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chia-Lin Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 何玟儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen-Yi Ho | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-04T16:21:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-02-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-11-21 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 英文參考文獻
1. Abecasis, P., De Michiel, F., Basalisco, B., Haanperä, T., & Iskandar, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence: The competitive landscape. Copenhagen Economics. 2. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D., Wu, J., Winter, C., ... Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901). Curran Associates, Inc. 3. Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V., Arulkumaran, K., Sengupta, B., & Bharath, A. A. (2018). Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(1), 53–65. 4. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 27). Curran Associates, Inc. 5. Härlin, T., Rova, G. B., Singla, A., Sokolov, O., & Sukharevsky, A. (2023). Exploring opportunities in the generative AI value chain. McKinsey & Company. 6. Hinton, G. E., Rumelhart, D. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536. 7. Ho, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, H., & Chen, H. (2020). AP-LDM: Attentive and progressive latent diffusion model for training-free high-resolution image generation. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 8. Isola, P., Zhu, J. Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017). Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1125–1134). 9. Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013). Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations. 10. Lu, D. C., Tai, L. A., Wu, H., & Lin, Y. (2024). A qualitative study of user perception of M365 AI Copilot. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), 104–115. 11. McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12–14. 12. McKinsey & Company. (2023). The economic potential of generative AI. McKinsey & Company. 13. Reznikov, R. B. (2024). Leveraging generative AI: Strategic adoption patterns for enterprises. Modeling the Development of the Economic Systems, 11(29), 75–88. 14. Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 10684–10695). 15. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536. 16. Sagi, S. (2024). Hybrid AI: Harnessing the power of cloud and on-premise datacenter for enterprise AI use cases. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 1(1), 1–12. 17. Sallam, R., Elliot, B., & others. (2024). How to calculate business value and cost for generative AI use cases (ID G00805323). Gartner. 18. Singla, A., Sukharevsky, A., Yee, L., Chui, M., & Hall, B. (2025). The state of AI: How organizations are rewiring to capture value. McKinsey & Company. 19. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. 20. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30). Curran Associates, Inc. 21. Wei, Q., & Mahmood, A. (2020). Recent advances in variational autoencoders with representation learning for biomedical informatics: A survey. IEEE Access, 8, 211922–211941. 22. Xu, N., Chen, H., & Gao, Y. (2013). Spherical latent spaces for stable variational autoencoders. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 23. Yee, L., Chui, M., Roberts, R., Rodchenko, T., Singla, A., Sukharevsky, A., & Zurkiya, D. (2023). What every CEO should know about generative AI. McKinsey & Company. 中文參考文獻 24. 陳怡如(2024)。善用軟硬整合 AI落地百工百業。工業技術與資訊月刊,391期。 網路資料 25. Evan Bailyn. (2025). Top Generative AI Chatbots by Market Share. https://firstpagesage.com/reports/top-generative-ai-chatbots/ 26. Hall, S. (2024). Copilot for Microsoft 365 review: Hands-on deep dive. Computerworld. https://www.computerworld.com/article/2513395/copilot-for-microsoft-365-review-hands-on-deep-dive.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com 27. 林裕洋(2025)。生成式 AI 應用情境多,如何帶動生態系產業成形?掌握 2025年生成式 AI 關鍵策略!CIO Taiwan。https://www.cio.com.tw/85544/ 28. 財團法人人工智慧科技基金會(2023)。2023臺灣產業AI化調查報告。 29. Microsoft. (2020). 2020 annual report. https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar20/index.html 30. Microsoft. (2021). 2021 annual report. https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar21/index.html 31. Microsoft. (2022). 2022 annual report. https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar22/index.html 32. Microsoft. (2023). 2023 annual report. https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar23/index.html 33. Microsoft. (2024). 2024 annual report. https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar24/index.html 34. Microsoft. (2023). Microsoft 365 Copilot 官方網站。https://www.microsoft.com/zh-tw/microsoft-365/microsoft-365-enterprise 35. Microsoft. (2024). Dynamics 365 Copilot 官方網站。https://www.microsoft.com/zh-tw/dynamics-365 36. Microsoft. (2025). 探索 Microsoft 365 Copilot 的運作方式。https://learn.microsoft.com/zh-tw/training/modules/introduction-microsoft-365-copilot/3-how-copilot-works 37. Microsoft. (2025). Microsoft Scenario Library. https://adoption.microsoft.com/en-us/scenario-library/ 38. Stryker, C., & Scapicchio, M. (2024). What is generative AI? IBM. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/generative-ai 39. 魏鑫陽(2025)。AI 概念股最新完整輪廓!半導體與 AI 伺服器等供應鏈一表掌握。遠見雜誌。https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/116721 40. 張彥文(2025)。盤點六大應用.五大連結.三大挑戰 企業大腦升級!生成式 AI 引爆轉型革命!哈佛商業評論。https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/23755/ai-revolution 41. 聯發科技(2020)。聯發科技一○九年年報。https://cdnwww.mediatek.com/posts/%E8%81%AF%E7%99%BC%E7%A7%912020%E5%B9%B4%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B10121.pdf 42. 聯發科技(2021)。聯發科技一一○年年報。https://cdn-www.mediatek.com/posts/110%E5%B9%B4%E8%81%AF%E7%99%BC%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1.pdf 43. 聯發科技(2022)。聯發科技一一一年年報。https://cdn-www.mediatek.com/posts/111%E5%B9%B4%E8%81%AF%E7%99%BC%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1.pdf 44. 聯發科技(2023)。聯發科技一一二年年報。https://cdn-www.mediatek.com/posts/112%E8%81%AF%E7%99%BC%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1.pdf 45. 聯發科技(2024)。DaVinci 官方網站。https://dvcbot.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DW/pages/2064385/FAQ | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101509 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著生成式人工智慧技術於2022年底迅速崛起,企業正迎來新一波生產力轉型的契機。生成式人工智慧具備學習資料模式並產出內容的能力,已逐步應用於企業業務中,展現出優化既有流程甚至重塑營運模式的潛力。在企業導入此類生產力工具以提升競爭力的過程中,需同時面對技術架構選擇,以及內部技術能力與外部市場條件等多重考量。
本研究以聯發科技DaVinci平台與Microsoft Copilot為研究個案,探討兩款企業級生成式人工智慧生產力工具於部署架構與應用模式上的差異。研究採用文獻回顧與個案分析法,首先梳理生成式人工智慧的技術發展脈絡、企業導入架構與應用策略,再進一步分析全球市場趨勢與臺灣企業的實際應用現況。在個案分析部分,深入比較聯發科技DaVinci平台與Microsoft Copilot在功能模組設計與技術特性上的表現,並從部署彈性、資料安全、系統擴展性、法規遵循與應用場景等層面進行探討。 研究結果顯示,DaVinci平台在資料管理與工具擴展性方面表現較為優異,特別是支援地端部署的特性,有助於企業強化資料主權與隱私;而Copilot則憑藉其高度與既有生態系的整合,在導入簡便、成本與法規相容性方面具備明顯優勢,較適合需要快速導入的企業。根據臺灣產業在AI應用成熟度與數位化程度上的差異,兩者各有適用情境,研究結果也給予各產業導入工具建議。 最後,研究亦針對生成式人工智慧工具的供應商與導入企業提出進一步建議。供應商應積極強化資料治理模組與法規透明度,主動建立並公開其遵循的國際合規框架,協助臺灣企業提升AI治理能力並降低導入門檻。同時,企業導入者亦應將生成式人工智慧納入中長期發展藍圖,明確設定應用目標與成效評估機制。此外,供應商若能強化軟硬體整合能力並推動使用者友善策略,將有助於拓展企業應用市場並提升整體競爭力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence technologies in late 2022, enterprises are facing a new wave of productivity transformation. Generative AI, which is capable of learning data patterns and producing content autonomously, has been gradually integrated into various business operations, demonstrating its potential not only to optimize existing workflows but also to reshape business models. As organizations seek to adopt such productivity tools to enhance competitiveness, they must consider multiple factors, including application models, deployment infrastructure, internal technical capabilities, and external market conditions.
This study focuses on two enterprise-level generative AI productivity tools—MediaTek’s DaVinci platform and Microsoft Copilot—as case studies to explore differences in their deployment architectures and application models. Adopting a methodology that combines literature review and case analysis, the research first outlines the development of generative AI technologies, enterprise implementation frameworks, and application strategies. It then examines global market trends and the current state of adoption among Taiwanese enterprises. The case study further compares the functional module designs and technical characteristics of the DaVinci platform and Microsoft Copilot, analyzing them in terms of deployment flexibility, data security, scalability, regulatory compliance, and practical use cases. The findings indicate that the DaVinci platform performs well in data management and tool extensibility, particularly through its support for on-premise deployment, which enhances enterprise data sovereignty and system integration. In contrast, Microsoft Copilot leverages strong integration within Microsoft’s ecosystem, offering notable advantages in process automation, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory compatibility, making it more suitable for organizations requiring rapid implementation. Based on varying levels of AI maturity and digitalization across Taiwanese industries, the study provides contextual recommendations for selecting appropriate tools. Lastly, this research offers strategic suggestions for both AI solution providers and adopting enterprises. Providers are advised to strengthen data governance modules and improve regulatory transparency by establishing and publicly disclosing international compliance frameworks, thereby helping Taiwanese companies enhance AI governance capabilities and reduce adoption barriers. Enterprises are encouraged to incorporate generative AI into their mid- to long-term strategic planning, with clearly defined objectives and performance evaluation mechanisms. In addition, providers that enhance software-hardware integration and develop ecosystem strategies will be better positioned to expand enterprise applications and improve overall competitiveness. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-04T16:21:21Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-02-04T16:21:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目次 vi 圖次 viii 表次 ix 1 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究方法 3 1.4 研究限制 4 2 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1 生成式人工智慧 6 2.1.1 生成式人工智慧歷史發展 6 2.1.2 生成式人工智慧核心技術 7 2.2 企業部署生成式人工智慧之基礎架構 11 2.2.1 雲端部署人工智慧 11 2.2.2 地端部署人工智慧 13 2.3 企業應用生成式人工智慧之模式 15 2.3.1 企業應用生成式人工智慧之策略思維 15 2.3.2 企業應用生成式人工智慧之技術模式 17 2.4 臺灣各產業生成式人工智慧企業應用現況 21 3 第三章 企業級生成式人工智慧生產力工具市場分析 28 3.1 生成式人工智慧生產力工具產業發展概況 28 3.1.1 全球市場主要競爭者 28 3.1.2 臺灣在全球市場的角色與現狀 32 3.2 企業選擇生成式人工智慧生產力工具的關鍵影響因素 35 3.3 企業應用生成式人工智慧生產力工具的成本評估 37 3.4 臺灣企業導入生成式人工智慧生產力工具概況 44 3.4.1 臺灣整體現況 44 3.4.2 臺灣各產業別生成式人工智慧工具導入狀況分析 47 4 第四章 個案分析 51 4.1 個案公司介紹 51 4.1.1 聯發科技股份有限公司 51 4.1.2 微軟公司 57 4.2 生成式人工智慧企業生產力工具 62 4.2.1 聯發科DaVinci生成式人工智慧服務平台 62 4.2.2 Microsoft Copilot企業生產力工具 71 4.3 生成式人工智慧企業生產力工具比較分析 84 4.3.1 導入企業應用模式比較 84 4.3.2 導入企業部署架構比較 89 4.4 結論 94 5 第五章 研究結論與建議 95 5.1 研究結論 95 5.2 研究建議 98 英文參考文獻 101 中文參考文獻 103 網路資料 103 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 生成式人工智慧 | - |
| dc.subject | 企業生產力工具 | - |
| dc.subject | 應用程式整合 | - |
| dc.subject | SaaS工具 | - |
| dc.subject | 聯發科 DaVinci | - |
| dc.subject | Microsoft Copilot | - |
| dc.subject | 臺灣企業AI治理 | - |
| dc.subject | Generative Artificial Intelligence | - |
| dc.subject | Enterprise Productivity Tools | - |
| dc.subject | Application Integration | - |
| dc.subject | SaaS Solutions | - |
| dc.subject | MediaTek DaVinci | - |
| dc.subject | Microsoft Copilot | - |
| dc.subject | AI Governance in Taiwanese Enterprises | - |
| dc.title | 生成式人工智慧企業生產力工具比較分析–以聯發科DaVinci與微軟Copilot為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Comparative Analysis of Generative AI Enterprise Productivity Tools: The Case Study of MediaTek DaVinci and Microsoft Copilot | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 李杭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Hang Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 余峻瑜;畢南怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jiun-Yu Yu;Nan-Yi Bi | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 生成式人工智慧,企業生產力工具應用程式整合SaaS工具聯發科 DaVinciMicrosoft Copilot臺灣企業AI治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Generative Artificial Intelligence,Enterprise Productivity ToolsApplication IntegrationSaaS SolutionsMediaTek DaVinciMicrosoft CopilotAI Governance in Taiwanese Enterprises | en |
| dc.relation.page | 105 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501287 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-11-24 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-11-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.6 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
