Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101481Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳學良 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsueh-Liang Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪瑞陽 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ray-Yang Hung | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-04T16:07:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-02-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-01-28 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton University Press.
Amodei, D., & Hernandez, D. (2018). AI and compute. OpenAI. https://openai.com/research/ai-and-compute Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556310 Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017, July). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/07/the-business-of-artificial-intelligence Dawson, P., Lowendahl, J.-M., & Gaehtgens, F. (2023, July 24). Understanding Gartner’s hype cycles (Gartner Research ID: G00793868). Gartner. Dedehayir, O., & Steinert, M. (2016). The hype cycle model: A review and future directions. Technovation, 45–46, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001 Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805 Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. Fenn, J. (1995). When to leap on the hype cycle. Gartner Research. Fenn, J., & Raskino, M. (2008). Mastering the hype cycle: How to choose the right innovation at the right time. Harvard Business Press. Floridi, L. (2024). Why the AI hype is another tech bubble. Philosophy & Technology, 37, Article 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00817-w Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 Garber, P. M. (1990). Famous first bubbles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.35 Gartner. (2020). Hype cycle for emerging technologies, 2020. Gartner. Goldfarb, B., & Kirsch, D. A. (2019). Bubbles and crashes: The boom and bust of technological innovation. Stanford University Press. Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking qualitative data. SAGE. International Energy Agency. (2024). Electricity 2024: Analysis and forecast to 2026. https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2024 Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Wernick, A. (2011). Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 521–548. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 Kindleberger, C. P., & Aliber, R. Z. (2011). Manias, panics, and crashes: A history of financial crises (6th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, 1097–1105. Litman, T. (2021). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Linden, A., & Fenn, J. (2003). Understanding Gartner’s hype cycles. Gartner Research. Odlyzko, A. (2010). Collective hallucinations and inefficient markets: The British Railway Mania of the 1840s. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1537338 Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798. O’Leary, D. E. (2008). Gartner’s hype cycle and information system research issues. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(4), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.09.001 Ofek, E., & Richardson, M. (2001). Dotcom mania: The rise and fall of internet stock prices (NBER Working Paper No. 8630). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8630 OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2009). Technological revolutions and stock prices. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1451–1483. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1451 Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Edward Elgar Publishing. Research Affiliates. (2025, March). The AI boom vs. the dot-com bubble: Have we seen this movie before? Research Affiliates. https://www.researchaffiliates.com Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press. Shiller, R. J. (2019). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton University Press. Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (2000). Behavioral portfolio theory. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(2), 127–151. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., … Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489. Steinert, M., & Leifer, L. (2012). Finding one’s way: Re-discovering a hunter-gatherer model based on wayfaring. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 251–262. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02243 Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M. A., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101481 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨於探討新技術出現時的市場行為與企業因應之道。首先,依據Gartner Hype Cycle模型的五階段,分別以技術發展、資本市場行為、媒體敘事三個構面去探討鐵路與網際網路兩大技術泡沫經典案例。根據歷史事實分析歸納出技術泡沫發生的特徵與成因,並對照目前正在發生的兩大新技術趨勢,自駕車與AI,進行的軌跡。研究發現,先前兩大技術泡沫具有一定程度的共通性,而目前兩大技術熱潮也正依循同樣的路徑發展。
其次,在解析技術熱潮(或泡沫)的特徵與成因之後,本研究繼續探討新技術相關企業如何在大趨勢下之反應。本研究後半段,分別選取網際網路泡沫與當下的AI熱潮下成功與失敗的公司作為個案,透過動態能力理論之視角,嘗試辨識出相似的特徵。本研究發現,依據動態能力理論三構面,成功存活的企業都同時做對了感知趨勢、把握機會、資源再配置轉型等關鍵作為,而失敗企業則是在變化快速的市場之中,做錯某些決定而步向失敗。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to investigate market behaviors and corporate responses during the emergence of new technologies. Drawing on the Gartner Hype Cycle’s five-stage framework, the research analyzes two historical cases of major technological bubbles—the British railway mania and the dot-com bubble—through the lenses of technological development, capital market behavior, and media narratives. By examining historical facts, this study identifies common causes and characteristics of technological bubbles and compares these with the trajectories of two contemporary technological trends. The findings reveal that both historical bubbles share significant structural similarities and that current technologies appear to be following a similar developmental path.
Beyond understanding the nature of bubbles, the study further explores how companies can respond effectively during periods of technological transition. In the latter part of the research, case studies of both successful and failed companies from the dot-com and AI eras are analyzed through the lens of dynamic capabilities theory. The results indicate that companies that survived and thrived were those that simultaneously demonstrated strong capabilities in sensing trends, seizing opportunities, and transforming resources and structures. In contrast, firms that failed often made critical missteps in a rapidly changing market environment, ultimately leading to their downfall. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-04T16:07:32Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-02-04T16:07:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次
口試委員審定書 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 目 次 iv 圖 次 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與課題 3 第三節 論文章節架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節Gartner Hype Cycle模型 5 第二節 泡沫理論 10 第三節 前景理論 14 第四節 動態能力理論 16 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 研究方法概要與介紹 21 第二節 個案選擇與資料蒐集方法 26 第三節 研究流程與架構 29 第四章 技術趨勢之質性分析:鐵路、網路、自駕車、AI 34 第一節 鐵路泡沫 35 第二節 網路泡沫 57 第三節 智能車 76 第四節 AI 98 第五節 研究洞見 124 第五章 企業在技術泡沫下的因應之道—以網路與AI為例 138 第一節 對比網路與 AI 產業:從歷史經驗中發現共性 138 第二節 網路泡沫下企業發展的異質性:成功與失敗企業 140 第三節 當代 AI 技術趨勢下成功與失敗企業特徵 156 第四節 研究洞見:動態能力理論視角下成功與失敗企業特徵整理 176 第六章 結論與建議 179 第一節 研究結論 179 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 180 參考文獻 184 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 網路泡沫 | - |
| dc.subject | 技術成熟度曲線 | - |
| dc.subject | 動態能力理論 | - |
| dc.subject | Dot-com Bubble | - |
| dc.subject | Gartner Hype Cycle | - |
| dc.subject | Dynamic Capabilities Theory | - |
| dc.title | 新技術趨勢初期之市場非理性行為與企業因應之道 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Technology-Driven Speculative Bubbles: A Comparative Analysis of Historical Patterns and Organizational Responses | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉峻賓;蕭義棋;鍾璧徽 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Ping Yeh;Yi-Chi Hsiao;Pi-Hui Chung | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 網路泡沫,技術成熟度曲線動態能力理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Dot-com Bubble,Gartner Hype CycleDynamic Capabilities Theory | en |
| dc.relation.page | 186 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600365 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-01-29 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 國際企業學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf Restricted Access | 2.86 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
