請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101465完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃國倉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kuo-Tsang Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 施博恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Bryon Flowers | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-03T16:29:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-04 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-02-03 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-01-21 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Parant, A. [World population prospects]. Futuribles 1990, 49-78.
2. Hafez, F.S.; Sa'di, B.; Safa-Gamal, M.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.; Alrifaey, M.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Stojcevski, A.; Horan, B.; Mekhilef, S. Energy Efficiency in Sustainable Buildings: A Systematic Review with Taxonomy, Challenges, Motivations, Methodological Aspects, Recommendations, and Pathways for Future Research. Energy Strategy Reviews 2023, 45, 101013, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.101013. 3. Li, X.; Yao, R. Modelling heating and cooling energy demand for building stock using a hybrid approach. Energy and Buildings 2021, 235, 110740, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110740. 4. Invidiata, A.; Lavagna, M.; Ghisi, E. Selecting design strategies using multi-criteria decision making to improve the sustainability of buildings. Building and Environment 2018, 139, 58-68, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.041. 5. Wang, T.; Seo, S.; Liao, P.-C.; Fang, D. GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: Review of two case studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016, 56, 484-493, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.037. 6. IEA. Tracking Buildings 202. Availabe online: https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-buildings-2020 (accessed on February 17, 2021). 7. Anderson, J.E.; Wulfhorst, G.; Lang, W. Energy analysis of the built environment—A review and outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015, 44, 149-158, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.027. 8. Cui, Y.; Yan, D.; Hong, T.; Ma, J. Temporal and spatial characteristics of the urban heat island in Beijing and the impact on building design and energy performance. Energy 2017, 130, 286-297, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.053. 9. Ojima, T. Changing Tokyo Metropolitan area and its heat island model. Energy and Buildings 1990, 15, 191-203, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(90)90131-2. 10. Oke, T.R.; Johnson, G.T.; Steyn, D.G.; Watson, I.D. Simulation of surface urban heat islands under ‘ideal’ conditions at night part 2: Diagnosis of causation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1991, 56, 339-358, doi:10.1007/BF00119211. 11. Schrijvers, P.J.C.; Jonker, H.J.J.; Kenjereš, S.; de Roode, S.R. Breakdown of the night time urban heat island energy budget. Building and Environment 2015, 83, 50-64, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.08.012. 12. Phelan, P.E.; Kaloush, K.; Miner, M.; Golden, J.; Phelan, B.; Silva, H.; Taylor, R.A. Urban Heat Island: Mechanisms, Implications, and Possible Remedies. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2015, 40, 285-307, doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021155. 13. Santamouris, M.; Cartalis, C.; Synnefa, A.; Kolokotsa, D. On the impact of urban heat island and global warming on the power demand and electricity consumption of buildings—A review. Energy and Buildings 2015, 98, 119-124, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.052. 14. Santamouris, M. On the energy impact of urban heat island and global warming on buildings. Energy and Buildings 2014, 82, 100-113, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.022. 15. Stathopoulou, E.; Mihalakakou, G.; Santamouris, M.; Bagiorgas, H.S. On the impact of temperature on tropospheric ozone concentration levels in urban environments. Journal of Earth System Science 2008, 117, 227-236, doi:10.1007/s12040-008-0027-9. 16. Pantavou, K.; Theoharatos, G.; Santamouris, M.; Asimakopoulos, D. Outdoor thermal sensation of pedestrians in a Mediterranean climate and a comparison with UTCI. Building and Environment 2013, 66, 82-95, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.02.014. 17. Santamouris, M.; Paraponiaris, K.; Mihalakakou, G. Estimating the ecological footprint of the heat island effect over Athens, Greece. Climatic Change 2007, 80, 265-276, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9128-0. 18. Sharma, M. Development of a ‘Green building sustainability model’ for Green buildings in India. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 190, 538-551, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.154. 19. Gou, Z.; Xie, X. Evolving green building: triple bottom line or regenerative design? Journal of Cleaner Production 2017, 153, 600-607, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.077. 20. Eichholtz, P.; Kok, N.; Quigley, J.M. Doing Well by Doing Good? Green Office Buildings. American Economic Review 2010, 100, 2492-2509, doi:10.1257/aer.100.5.2492. 21. Darko, A.; Chan, A.P.C. Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat International 2016, 57, 53-63, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.001. 22. Ngo, N.-T. Early predicting cooling loads for energy-efficient design in office buildings by machine learning. Energy and Buildings 2019, 182, 264-273, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.004. 23. Grobman, Y.J.; Elimelech, Y. Microclimate on building envelopes: testing geometry manipulations as an approach for increasing building envelopes' thermal performance. Architectural Science Review 2016, 59, 269-278, doi:10.1080/00038628.2015.1025688. 24. Corrado, V.; Ballarini, I. Refurbishment trends of the residential building stock: Analysis of a regional pilot case in Italy. Energy and Buildings 2016, 132, 91-106, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.022. 25. Sola, A.; Corchero, C.; Salom, J.; Sanmarti, M. Simulation Tools to Build Urban-Scale Energy Models: A Review. Energies 2018, 11, 3269. 26. (TESS), T.E.S.S. TRNSYS, 18.0; Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2019. 27. Software, D.B. DesignBuilder, 7.0; Gloucs, UK, 2021. 28. Strachan, P. ESP-r, 13.3.17; Energy Systems Research Unit (ESRU): University of Strathcylde, Glasgow, 2016. 29. Noel, J. CoDyBa - Dynamical Behaviour for Buildings, 6.5; JNLOG Scientific Computing: Lyon, France, 2021. 30. Laboratory, N.R.E. EnergyPlus™, 9.2.0; 2020. 31. Corrado, V.; Fabrizio, E. Chapter 5 - Steady-State and Dynamic Codes, Critical Review, Advantages and Disadvantages, Accuracy, and Reliability. In Handbook of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Asdrubali, F., Desideri, U., Eds. Butterworth-Heinemann: 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812817-6.00011-5pp. 263-294. 32. Mazzeo, D.; Matera, N.; Cornaro, C.; Oliveti, G.; Romagnoni, P.; De Santoli, L. EnergyPlus, IDA ICE and TRNSYS predictive simulation accuracy for building thermal behaviour evaluation by using an experimental campaign in solar test boxes with and without a PCM module. Energy and Buildings 2020, 212, 109812, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109812. 33. Zhang, R.; Lam, K.P.; Yao, S.-c.; Zhang, Y. Coupled EnergyPlus and computational fluid dynamics simulation for natural ventilation. Building and Environment 2013, 68, 100-113, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.04.002. 34. Yang, X.; Zhao, L.; Bruse, M.; Meng, Q. An integrated simulation method for building energy performance assessment in urban environments. Energy and Buildings 2012, 54, 243-251, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.042. 35. Bouyer, J.; Inard, C.; Musy, M. Microclimatic coupling as a solution to improve building energy simulation in an urban context. Energy and Buildings 2011, 43, 1549-1559, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.010. 36. de la Flor, F.S.; Domı́nguez, S.A. Modelling microclimate in urban environments and assessing its influence on the performance of surrounding buildings. Energy and Buildings 2004, 36, 403-413, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.050. 37. Kawai, H.; Saito, R.; Sato, R. Numerical study: How does a high-rise building affect the surrounding thermal environment by its shading? 38. Kesten, D.; Tereci, A.; Strzalka, A.M.; Eicker, U. A method to quantify the energy performance in urban quarters. HVAC&R Research 2012, 18, 100-111, doi:10.1080/10789669.2011.583307. 39. Strømann-Andersen, J.; Sattrup, P.A. The urban canyon and building energy use: Urban density versus daylight and passive solar gains. Energy and Buildings 2011, 43, 2011-2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.007. 40. Frayssinet, L.; Merlier, L.; Kuznik, F.; Hubert, J.-L.; Milliez, M.; Roux, J.-J. Modeling the heating and cooling energy demand of urban buildings at city scale. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 81, 2318-2327, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.040. 41. Piacenza, J.R.; Fields, J.J.; Hoyle, C.; Tumer, I.Y. Quantification of indoor environmental quality in sustainable building designs using structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, 27-30 July 2015. 42. Lauzet, N.; Rodler, A.; Musy, M.; Azam, M.-H.; Guernouti, S.; Mauree, D.; Colinart, T. How building energy models take the local climate into account in an urban context – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019, 116, 109390, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109390. 43. Ramponi, R.; Blocken, B.; de Coo, L.B.; Janssen, W.D. CFD simulation of outdoor ventilation of generic urban configurations with different urban densities and equal and unequal street widths. Building and Environment 2015, 92, 152-166, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.018. 44. Oke, T.R. The urban energy balance. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 1988, 12, 471-508, doi:10.1177/030913338801200401. 45. CNRM Town Energy Balance (TEB), National Centre for Meteorological Research - UMR 3589: 2014. 46. Morille, B.; Lauzet, N.; Musy, M. SOLENE-microclimate: A Tool to Evaluate Envelopes Efficiency on Energy Consumption at District Scale. Energy Procedia 2015, 78, 1165-1170, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.088. 47. Lac, C.; Chaboureau, J.P.; Masson, V.; Pinty, J.P.; Tulet, P.; Escobar, J.; Leriche, M.; Barthe, C.; Aouizerats, B.; Augros, C., et al. Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications. Geosci. Model Dev. 2018, 11, 1929-1969, doi:10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018. 48. Bruse, M. ENVI-met, 4.4.3; 45136 Essen, Germany, 2020. 49. Bueno, B.; Norford, L.; Hidalgo, J.; Pigeon, G. The urban weather generator. Journal of Building Performance Simulation 2013, 6, 269-281, doi:10.1080/19401493.2012.718797. 50. Toparlar, Y.; Blocken, B.; Maiheu, B.; van Heijst, G.J.F. A review on the CFD analysis of urban microclimate. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017, 80, 1613-1640, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.248. 51. Gros, A.; Bozonnet, E.; Inard, C. Cool materials impact at district scale—Coupling building energy and microclimate models. Sustainable Cities and Society 2014, 13, 254-266, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.02.002. 52. Castaldo, V.L.; Pisello, A.L.; Piselli, C.; Fabiani, C.; Cotana, F.; Santamouris, M. How outdoor microclimate mitigation affects building thermal-energy performance: A new design-stage method for energy saving in residential near-zero energy settlements in Italy. Renewable Energy 2018, 127, 920-935, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.090. 53. Huttner, S. Further development and application of the 3D microclimate simulation ENVI-met. Dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, 2012. 54. Crank, P.J.; Sailor, D.J.; Ban-Weiss, G.; Taleghani, M. Evaluating the ENVI-met microscale model for suitability in analysis of targeted urban heat mitigation strategies. Urban Climate 2018, 26, 188-197, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.09.002. 55. Lee, H.; Mayer, H.; Chen, L. Contribution of trees and grasslands to the mitigation of human heat stress in a residential district of Freiburg, Southwest Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 2016, 148, 37-50, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.004. 56. Morakinyo, T.E.; Lam, Y.F. Simulation study on the impact of tree-configuration, planting pattern and wind condition on street-canyon's micro-climate and thermal comfort. Building and Environment 2016, 103, 262-275, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.025. 57. Ohashi, Y.; Genchi, Y.; Kondo, H.; Kikegawa, Y.; Yoshikado, H.; Hirano, Y. Influence of air-conditioning waste heat on air temperature in Tokyo during summer: Numerical experiments using an urban canopy model coupled with a building energy model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 2007, 46, 66-81, doi:10.1175/JAM2441.1. 58. Mauree, D.; Coccolo, S.; Kaempf, J.; Scartezzini, J.-L. Multi-scale modelling to evaluate building energy consumption at the neighbourhood scale. PLOS ONE 2017, 12, e0183437, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183437. 59. Mavrogianni, A.; Davies, M.; Batty, M.; Belcher, S.E.; Bohnenstengel, S.I.; Carruthers, D.; Chalabi, Z.; Croxford, B.; Demanuele, C.; Evans, S., et al. The comfort, energy and health implications of London’s urban heat island. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 2011, 32, 35-52, doi:10.1177/0143624410394530. 60. Mirzaei, P.A.; Haghighat, F. Approaches to study Urban Heat Island – Abilities and limitations. Building and Environment 2010, 45, 2192-2201, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.04.001. 61. Cesaratto, P.G.; De Carli, M. A measuring campaign of thermal conductance in situ and possible impacts on net energy demand in buildings. Energy and Buildings 2013, 59, 29-36, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.036. 62. Johnston, D.; Miles-Shenton, D.; Farmer, D. Quantifying the domestic building fabric ‘performance gap’. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 2015, 36, 614-627, doi:10.1177/0143624415570344. 63. Spitz, C.; Mora, L.; Wurtz, E.; Jay, A. Practical application of uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis on an experimental house. Energy and Buildings 2012, 55, 459-470, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.013. 64. Bueno, B.; Nakano, A.; Norford, L. Urban weather generator: a method to predic neighborhood-specific urban temperatures for use in building energy simulations. In Proceedings of ICUC9 - 9th International Conference on Urban Climate jointly with 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment, France, July 1st, 2015. 65. Mao, J.; Yang, J.H.; Afshari, A.; Norford, L.K. Global sensitivity analysis of an urban microclimate system under uncertainty: Design and case study. Building and Environment 2017, 124, 153-170, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.011. 66. Bueno, B.; Nakano, A.; Norford, L.; Reinhart, C. Urban Weather Generator - a Novel Workflow for Integrating Urban Heat Island Effect within Urban Design Process. International Building Performance Simulation Association, BR2015 2015. 67. Yang, J.H. The Curious Case of Urban Heat Island: A Systems Analysis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Libraries, 2016. 68. Ooka, R.; Sato, T.; Harayama, K.; Murakami, S.; Kawamoto, Y. Thermal Energy Balance Analysis of the Tokyo Metropolitan Area Using a Mesoscale Meteorological Model Incorporating an Urban Canopy Model. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 2011, 138, 77-97, doi:10.1007/s10546-010-9550-8. 69. Masson, V. A Physically-Based Scheme For The Urban Energy Budget In Atmospheric Models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 2000, 94, 357-397, doi:10.1023/A:1002463829265. 70. Castaldo, V.L.; Pisello, A.L. Uses of dynamic simulation to predict thermal-energy performance of buildings and districts: a review. WIREs Energy and Environment 2018, 7, e269, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.269. 71. Hyl, C.; Lee, E.; Liu, J.; Neuendorffer, S.; Cheong, E.; H, J.; Tsay, J.; Vogel, B.; Williams, W.; Xiong, Y., et al. Ptolemy II: Heterogeneous Concurrent Modeling And Design In Java. 2002. 72. Wetter, M.; Nouidui, T.S. Building Controls Virtual Test Bed User Manual Version 1.6.0. Laboratory, L.B.N., Ed. Berkely, CA 94720, 2016; p 90. 73. Wetter, M. Co-simulation of building energy and control systems with the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed. Journal of Building Performance Simulation 2011, 4, 185-203, doi:10.1080/19401493.2010.518631. 74. Shen, P.; Dai, M.; Xu, P.; Dong, W. Building heating and cooling load under different neighbourhood forms: Assessing the effect of external convective heat transfer. Energy 2019, 173, 75-91, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.062. 75. (NREL), N.R.E.L. EnergyPlus 9.2.0; US Department of Energy: 2019. 76. Yüksek, I.; Karadayi, T. Energy-Efficient Building Design in the Context of Building Life Cycle. 2017; 10.5772/66670. 77. Building Control Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB), 1.6.0; US Department of Energy: Lawerence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 2016. 78. Ramesh, S. Urban Energy Information Modeling: A Framework To Quantify The Thermodynamic Interactions Between The Natural And The Built Environment That Affect Building Energy Consumption. Carnegie Mellon University, 2018. 79. Kharbouch, A.; Berrabah, S.; Bakhouya, M.; Gaber, J.; El Ouadghiri, D.; Idrissi Kaitouni, S. Experimental and Co-Simulation Performance Evaluation of an Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger System Integrated into a Smart Building. Energies 2022, 15, 5407. 80. Miguel, M.; Hien, W.N.; Marcel, I.; Jun Chung, H.D.; Yueer, H.; Zhonqi, Y.; Ji-Yu, D.; Raghavan, S.V.; Son, N.N. A physically-based model of interactions between a building and its outdoor conditions at the urban microscale. Energy and Buildings 2021, 237, 110788, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110788. 81. Tsoka, S. Evaluating the Impact of Urban Microclimate on Buildings’ Heating and Cooling Energy Demand Using a Co-Simulation Approach. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 652. 82. Huang, K.-T.; Li, Y.-J. Impact of street canyon typology on building’s peak cooling energy demand: A parametric analysis using orthogonal experiment. Energy and Buildings 2017, 154, 448-464, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.054. 83. Chen, Y.-C.; Lo, T.-W.; Shih, W.-Y.; Lin, T.-P. Interpreting air temperature generated from urban climatic map by urban morphology in Taipei. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 2019, 137, 2657-2662, doi:10.1007/s00704-018-02764-x. 84. Hwang, R.-L.; Lin, C.-Y.; Huang, K.-T. Spatial and temporal analysis of urban heat island and global warming on residential thermal comfort and cooling energy in Taiwan. Energy and Buildings 2017, 152, 804-812, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.016. 85. Lin, C.-Y.; Chen, F.; Huang, J.C.; Chen, W.C.; Liou, Y.A.; Chen, W.N.; Liu, S.-C. Urban heat island effect and its impact on boundary layer development and land–sea circulation over northern Taiwan. Atmospheric Environment 2008, 42, 5635-5649, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.015. 86. Koralegedara, S.B.; Lin, C.-Y.; Sheng, Y.-F.; Kuo, C.-H. Estimation of anthropogenic heat emissions in urban Taiwan and their spatial patterns. Environmental Pollution 2016, 215, 84-95, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.055. 87. LLC, L.T. Ladybug Tools, 1.2.0; 2021. 88. Bueno, B.; Roth, M.; Norford, L.; Li, R. Computationally efficient prediction of canopy level urban air temperature at the neighbourhood scale. Urban Climate 2014, 9, 35-53, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.05.005. 89. Quah, A.K.L.; Roth, M. Diurnal and weekly variation of anthropogenic heat emissions in a tropical city, Singapore. Atmospheric Environment 2012, 46, 92-103, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.015. 90. TomTom. Taiwan: Taipei traffic. TomTom Traffic Index, 2017. 91. Alchapar, N.; Pezzuto, C.; Correa, E.; Salvati, A. Thermal performance of the Urban Weather Generator model as a tool for planning sustainable urban development. Geographica Pannonica 2019, 23, 374-384, doi:10.5937/gp23-24254. 92. Palme, M.; Inostroza, L.; Villacreses, G.; Lobato, A.; Carrasco, C. Urban weather data and building models for the inclusion of the urban heat island effect in building performance simulation. Data in Brief 2017, 14, 671-675, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.08.035. 93. Martien, P.; Akbari, H.; Rosenfeld, A. Light Colored Surfaces To Reduce Summertime Urban Temperatures: Benefits, Costs, and Implementation Issues. In Proceedings of 9th Miami Internation Congress on Energy and Environment, Miami Beach, FL, 11-13 December. 94. Bretz, S.; Akbari, H.; Rosenfeld, A.; Taha, H. Implementation of Solar-Reflective Surfaces: Materials and Utility Programs. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1992, OSTI ID:10172670, doi:OSTI ID:10172670. 95. Baker, M.C. Roofs: Design, Application and Maintenance; Polyscience Publications, Canada: 1980. 96. Sailor, D.J. A review of methods for estimating anthropogenic heat and moisture emissions in the urban environment. International Journal of Climatology 2011, 31, 189-199, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2106. 97. Tsoka, S.; Tsikaloudaki, A.; Theodosiou, T. Analyzing the ENVI-met microclimate model’s performance and assessing cool materials and urban vegetation applications–A review. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018, 43, 55-76, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.009. 98. Zhong, W.; Zhang, T.; Tamura, T. CFD Simulation of Convective Heat Transfer on Vernacular Sustainable Architecture: Validation and Application of Methodology. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4231, doi:10.3390/su11154231. 99. Standardization, I.O.f. Building Components and Building Elements - Thermal Resistance and Thermal Transmittance - Calculation Method (ISO 6946: 2007). 2007. 100. Huang, C.-H.; Tsai, H.-H.; Chen, H.-c. Influence of Weather Factors on Thermal Comfort in Subtropical Urban Environments. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2001. 101. Albatayneh, A.; Alterman, D.; Page, A.; Moghtaderi, B. Alternative Method to the Replication of Wind Effects into the Buildings Thermal Simulation. Buildings 2020, 10, 237. 102. Kahsay, M.; Bitsuamlak, G.; Tariku, F. Effect of localized exterior convective heat transfer on high-rise building energy consumption. Building Simulation 2019, 13, doi:10.1007/s12273-019-0568-7. 103. Szkordilisz, F.; Zöld, A. Effect of Vegetation on Wind-Comfort. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2016, 824, 811-818, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.824.811. 104. Montazeri, H.; Blocken, B.; Derome, D.; Carmeliet, J.; Hensen, J.L.M. CFD analysis of forced convective heat transfer coefficients at windward building facades: Influence of building geometry. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 2015, 146, 102-116, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.07.007. 105. Vallati, A.; Vollaro, A.D.L.; Golasi, I.; Barchiesi, E.; Caranese, C. On the Impact of Urban Micro Climate on the Energy Consumption of Buildings. Energy Procedia 2015, 82, 506-511, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.862. 106. Jani, D.; Naim, W.; Salleh, S. Effects of High-Rise Residential Building Shape and Height on the Urban Microclimate in a Tropical Region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021, 767, 012031, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012031. 107. Yin, C.-Y. Prediction of higher heating values of biomass from proximate and ultimate analyses. Fuel 2011, 90, 1128-1132, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.031. 108. Michalak, P. Experimental and Theoretical Study on the Internal Convective and Radiative Heat Transfer Coefficients for a Vertical Wall in a Residential Building. Energies 2021, 14, 5953. 109. Tsoka, S. Evaluating the Impact of Urban Microclimate on Buildings’ Heating and Cooling Energy Demand Using a Co-Simulation Approach. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 652. 110. Sellier, D.; Ségura, R. Radial growth anisotropy and temporality in fast-growing temperate conifers. Annals of Forest Science 2020, 77, 85, doi:10.1007/s13595-020-00991-9. 111. Etzold, S.; Sterck, F.; Bose, A.K.; Braun, S.; Buchmann, N.; Eugster, W.; Gessler, A.; Kahmen, A.; Peters, R.L.; Vitasse, Y., et al. Number of growth days and not length of the growth period determines radial stem growth of temperate trees. Ecology Letters 2022, 25, 427-439, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13933. 112. Zhao, Y.; Sen, S.; Susca, T.; Iaria, J.; Kubilay, A.; Gunawardena, K.; Zhou, X.; Takane, Y.; Park, Y.; Wang, X., et al. Beating urban heat: Multimeasure-centric solution sets and a complementary framework for decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2023, 186, 113668, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113668. 113. Booten, C.; Kruis, N.; Christensen, C. Identifying and Resolving Issues in EnergyPlus and DOE-2 Window Heat Transfer Calculations; 2012; https://doi.org/10.2172/1051164. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101465 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文介紹了一種旨在彌合建築能源模擬與都市氣候建模之間差距的方法。透過BCVTB(The Building Controls Virtual Test Bed)開發了一種耦合方法，並應用於台灣台北市的案例研究，以解決街道樹木在冷卻能耗方面的重要微氣候因素。使用城市天氣生成器進行天氣檔案修改，顯示平均氣溫差異微0.63°C。該耦合方法強調了準確的風速和建築表面的對流熱傳係數（CHTCs）對確定冷卻能耗的重要性。結果顯示，CHTC 值升高會增強熱交換，而較高的風速在散熱中起著至關重要的作用。同時，研究發現，街道樹木的存在顯著減少了熱通量滲透，使炎熱月份建築表面溫度下降了高達9.5%。在 BCVTB 耦合模擬中，包含樹木的情境相較於不含樹木的情境，冷卻能耗最高可降低約 16%，顯示植栽對建築冷卻需求具有顯著的緩解效果。整體而言，本研究提供了對建築與其周圍環境之間複雜交互作用的深入理解，並突顯街道樹木與遮陽措施在降低都市熱島效應及促進節能型都市規劃中的重要性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study presents a methodological framework designed to narrow the disconnect between building energy simulation and urban climate modeling. A coupled simulation approach was implemented using the Building Control Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB) and applied to a case study in Taipei City, Taiwan, with a focus on microclimatic influences of street trees relevant to cooling energy demand. Weather file modification using the Urban Weather Generator resulted in an average air temperature difference of 0.63 °C. The coupled framework underscored the critical role of accurate wind speed representation and convective heat transfer coefficients (CHTCs) at building surfaces in governing cooling energy performance. The findings demonstrated that increased CHTC values intensify heat exchange processes, while higher wind speeds substantially enhance heat removal. Street tree presence was shown to markedly limit heat flux transmission, yielding reductions in building surface temperatures of up to 9.5% during warm periods. Cooling energy consumption decreased by as much as 16% in BCVTB simulations incorporating trees relative to scenarios without vegetation. This work provides substantive insight into the coupled interactions between buildings and surrounding urban environments. The outcomes emphasize the role of trees and shading strategies in alleviating urban heat island effects and advancing energy-efficient urban design. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-03T16:29:33Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-02-03T16:29:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | i. 論文口試委員會審定書 i
ii. Acknowledgements ii iii. 摘要 iii iv. Abstract iv v. Contents v vi. List of Figures viii vii. List of Tables x 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Urban heat island (UHI) 1 1.3. Sustainability 2 2. Literature review 3 2.1. Building energy and simulation 3 2.1.1. EnergyPlus 3 2.2. Urban microclimate 5 2.2.1. ENVI-met 5 2.2.2. Meteorological Data 7 2.2.3. Urban Weather Generator (UWG) 8 2.3. Coupled BES and UCM programs 12 2.3.1. Building Control Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB) 13 2.3.2. Interfacing the BCVTB with EnergyPlus 16 2.4. The coupled perspective 16 2.5. Objectives 18 3. Material and methods 20 3.1. Urban context and domain 21 3.1.1. Study area 21 3.1.2. Building model 21 3.2. Simulations 24 3.2.1. Weather file modification with UWG 24 3.2.2. Building energy simulation with EnergyPlus 27 3.2.3. Microclimate simulation (ENVI-met) 28 3.2.4. Building Control Virtual Test Bed (coupled platform) 30 3.3. Correspondence between ENVI-met and EnergyPlus 31 3.4. Coupled method 32 3.4.1. Coupled strategy 33 3.4.2. Absorbed direct and diffuse solar radiation 34 3.4.3. Surface boundary conditions (CHTC + RLHTC) 35 3.4.4. Implementation of coupled strategy 37 4. Results and Discussion 38 4.1. UWG generated weather results 38 4.2. ENVI-met simulated micro-climate results 40 4.2.1. Wind speed 40 4.2.2. Ambient air temperature 42 4.3. Results of BCVTB-coupled simulations 45 4.3.1. Surface temperature 45 4.3.2. EnergyPlus-only CHTC vs BCVTB-coupled CHTC 49 4.3.3. CHTC vs surface temperature 51 4.3.4. Correlation and scatter plot matrix of variables 54 4.3.5. BCVTB surface temperature results uncertainty analysis 57 4.4. Urban canyon’s micro-climate conditions with and without trees 59 4.5. Impacts of microclimate behavior on cooling energy consumption 63 4.6. Orientation-dependent cooling energy response under microclimate coupling 67 4.7. Contributions of the proposed coupled method to the trees’ cooling effect on the building’s cooling energy 70 5. Conclusions 72 5.1. Summary of findings 72 5.2. Limitations 75 5.3. Future work 77 6. References 79 7. Appendices 95 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 建築能源 | - |
| dc.subject | 對流熱傳係數(CHTC) | - |
| dc.subject | 都市峽谷氣候 | - |
| dc.subject | 樹木的降溫效果 | - |
| dc.subject | 行道樹 | - |
| dc.subject | building energy | - |
| dc.subject | CHTC | - |
| dc.subject | urban canyon climate | - |
| dc.subject | greenery cooling effect | - |
| dc.subject | street vegetation | - |
| dc.title | 發展一種用於分析行道樹對建築物製冷能耗響的協 同模擬技術 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Developing a Co-simulation Technique for Analysing Building Cooling Energy Affected by Avenue Trees | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 胡明哲;黃瑞隆;陳薇安;傅群 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ming-Che Hu;Ruey-Lung Hwang;Wei-An Chen;Chun Fu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 建築能源,對流熱傳係數(CHTC)都市峽谷氣候樹木的降溫效果行道樹 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | building energy,CHTCurban canyon climategreenery cooling effectstreet vegetation | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600160 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-01-21 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-01-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.93 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。