Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 化學工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101362
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蔡偉博zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWei-Bor Tsaien
dc.contributor.author陳柏勲zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorPo-Hsun Chenen
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-27T16:13:14Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-28-
dc.date.copyright2026-01-27-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-01-14-
dc.identifier.citation[1] V.P. Gray, C.D. Amelung, I.J. Duti, E.G. Laudermilch, R.A. Letteri, K.J. Lampe, Biomaterials via peptide assembly: Design, characterization, and application in tissue engineering, Acta biomaterialia 140 (2022) 43-75.
[2] M.D. Shoulders, R.T. Raines, Collagen structure and stability, Annual review of biochemistry 78(1) (2009) 929-958.
[3] J. Elango, C. Hou, B. Bao, S. Wang, J.E. Maté Sánchez de Val, W. Wenhui, The molecular interaction of collagen with cell receptors for biological function, Polymers 14(5) (2022) 876.
[4] K. Gelse, E. Pöschl, T. Aigner, Collagens—structure, function, and biosynthesis, Advanced drug delivery reviews 55(12) (2003) 1531-1546.
[5] E.E. Antoine, P.P. Vlachos, M.N. Rylander, Review of collagen I hydrogels for bioengineered tissue microenvironments: characterization of mechanics, structure, and transport, Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 20(6) (2014) 683-696.
[6] R. Naomi, P.M. Ridzuan, H. Bahari, Current insights into collagen type I, Polymers 13(16) (2021) 2642.
[7] I. Boraschi-Diaz, J. Wang, J.S. Mort, S.V. Komarova, Collagen type I as a ligand for receptor-mediated signaling, Frontiers in Physics 5 (2017) 12.
[8] A. Skardal, A. Atala, Biomaterials for integration with 3-D bioprinting, Annals of biomedical engineering 43(3) (2015) 730-746.
[9] J. Glowacki, S. Mizuno, Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering, Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules 89(5) (2008) 338-344.
[10] A.B. Bello, D. Kim, D. Kim, H. Park, S.-H. Lee, Engineering and functionalization of gelatin biomaterials: From cell culture to medical applications, Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 26(2) (2020) 164-180.
[11] A. Serafin, M. Culebras, M.N. Collins, Synthesis and evaluation of alginate, gelatin, and hyaluronic acid hybrid hydrogels for tissue engineering applications, International journal of biological macromolecules 233 (2023) 123438.
[12] L. Ouyang, R. Yao, Y. Zhao, W. Sun, Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells, Biofabrication 8(3) (2016) 035020.
[13] A. Mazzocchi, M. Devarasetty, R. Huntwork, S. Soker, A. Skardal, Optimization of collagen type I-hyaluronan hybrid bioink for 3D bioprinted liver microenvironments, Biofabrication 11(1) (2018) 015003.
[14] P.-H. Chen, I.-H. Chen, W.-H. Kao, S.-Y. Wu, W.-B. Tsai, Characterization and application of photocrosslinkable collagen maleate as bioink in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting, Biomaterials Science 12(19) (2024) 5063-5075.
[15] Y.L. Xiong, Protein denaturation and functionality losses, Quality in frozen food, Springer1997, pp. 111-140.
[16] L.C. Abraham, E. Zuena, B. Perez‐Ramirez, D.L. Kaplan, Guide to collagen characterization for biomaterial studies, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 87(1) (2008) 264-285.
[17] L. Wei, W. Yan, W. Shah, Z. Zhang, M. Wang, B. Liu, Z. Xue, Y. Cao, X. Hou, K. Zhang, Advancements and challenges in stem cell transplantation for regenerative medicine, Heliyon 10(16) (2024).
[18] H. Samadian, H. Maleki, Z. Allahyari, M. Jaymand, Natural polymers-based light-induced hydrogels: Promising biomaterials for biomedical applications, Coordination Chemistry Reviews 420 (2020) 213432.
[19] S. Scheiner, Understanding noncovalent bonds and their controlling forces, The Journal of Chemical Physics 153(14) (2020).
[20] C. Zhao, Z. Wu, H. Chu, T. Wang, S. Qiu, J. Zhou, Q. Zhu, X. Liu, D. Quan, Y. Bai, Thiol-rich multifunctional macromolecular crosslinker for gelatin-norbornene-based bioprinting, Biomacromolecules 22(6) (2021) 2729-2739.
[21] K. Guo, H. Wang, S. Li, H. Zhang, S. Li, H. Zhu, Z. Yang, L. Zhang, P. Chang, X. Zheng, Collagen-based thiol–norbornene photoclick bio-ink with excellent bioactivity and printability, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13(6) (2021) 7037-7050.
[22] W. Friess, Collagen–biomaterial for drug delivery, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics 45(2) (1998) 113-136.
[23] V.L. Cross, Y. Zheng, N.W. Choi, S.S. Verbridge, B.A. Sutermaster, L.J. Bonassar, C. Fischbach, A.D. Stroock, Dense type I collagen matrices that support cellular remodeling and microfabrication for studies of tumor angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in vitro, Biomaterials 31(33) (2010) 8596-8607.
[24] K.E. Kadler, D.F. Holmes, J.A. Trotter, J.A. Chapman, Collagen fibril formation, Biochemical Journal 316(1) (1996) 1-11.
[25] S. Robins, Biochemistry and functional significance of collagen cross-linking, Biochemical Society Transactions 35(5) (2007) 849-852.
[26] M. Achilli, D. Mantovani, Tailoring mechanical properties of collagen-based scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering: the effects of pH, temperature and ionic strength on gelation, Polymers 2(4) (2010) 664-680.
[27] D.T. Cheung, M.E. Nimni, Mechanism of crosslinking of proteins by glutaraldehyde II. Reaction with monomeric and polymeric collagen, Connective Tissue Research 10(2) (1982) 201-216.
[28] S.O. Sarrigiannidis, J.M. Rey, O. Dobre, C. González-García, M.J. Dalby, M. Salmeron-Sanchez, A tough act to follow: Collagen hydrogel modifications to improve mechanical and growth factor loading capabilities, Materials Today Bio 10 (2021) 100098.
[29] R. Jeyanthi, K. Panduranga, Collagen-poly (Hema) hydrogels for the controlled release of anticancer drugs—preparation and characterization, Journal of bioactive and compatible polymers 5(2) (1990) 194-211.
[30] H.-W. Sung, D.-M. Huang, W.-H. Chang, L.L. Huang, C.-C. Tsai, I.-L. Liang, Gelatin-derived bioadhesives for closing skin wounds: an in vivo study, Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 10(7) (1999) 751-771.
[31] B.B. Pinheiro, S. Saibi, L. Haroune, N.S. Rios, L.R. Gonçalves, H. Cabana, Genipin and glutaraldehyde based laccase two-layers immobilization with improved properties: New biocatalysts with high potential for enzymatic removal of trace organic contaminants, Enzyme and Microbial Technology 169 (2023) 110261.
[32] L.O. Damink, P. Dijkstra, M. Van Luyn, P. Van Wachem, P. Nieuwenhuis, J. Feijen, Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide, Biomaterials 17(8) (1996) 765-773.
[33] J. Lee, H. Edwards, C. Pereira, S. Samii, Crosslinking of tissue-derived biomaterials in 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC), Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 7(9) (1996) 531-541.
[34] Q. Lv, K. Hu, Q. Feng, F. Cui, Fibroin/collagen hybrid hydrogels with crosslinking method: preparation, properties, and cytocompatibility, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 84(1) (2008) 198-207.
[35] M. Rafat, F. Li, P. Fagerholm, N.S. Lagali, M.A. Watsky, R. Munger, T. Matsuura, M. Griffith, PEG-stabilized carbodiimide crosslinked collagen–chitosan hydrogels for corneal tissue engineering, Biomaterials 29(29) (2008) 3960-3972.
[36] Z. Zhang, W. Liu, D. Li, G. Li, Physicochemical properties of succinylated calfskin pepsin-solubilized collagen, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry 71(8) (2007) 2057-2060.
[37] I.D. Gaudet, D.I. Shreiber, Characterization of methacrylated type-I collagen as a dynamic, photoactive hydrogel, Biointerphases 7(1) (2012).
[38] K.E. Drzewiecki, A.S. Parmar, I.D. Gaudet, J.R. Branch, D.H. Pike, V. Nanda, D.I. Shreiber, Methacrylation induces rapid, temperature-dependent, reversible self-assembly of type-I collagen, Langmuir 30(37) (2014) 11204-11211.
[39] D. Pamfil, M.T. Nistor, L.F. Zemljic, L. Verestiuc, M. Cazacu, C. Vasile, Preparation and characterization of methyl substituted maleic anhydride: Modified collagens destined for medical applications, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53(10) (2014) 3865-3879.
[40] D. Pamfil, C. Schick, C. Vasile, New hydrogels based on substituted anhydride modified collagen and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Synthesis and characterization, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53(28) (2014) 11239-11248.
[41] X. He, Q. Wang, Y. Zhao, H. Zhang, B. Wang, J. Pan, J. Li, H. Yu, L. Wang, J. Dai, Effect of intramyocardial grafting collagen scaffold with mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA network open 3(9) (2020) e2016236-e2016236.
[42] D. Pankajakshan, S.L. Voytik-Harbin, J.E. Nör, M.C. Bottino, Injectable highly tunable oligomeric collagen matrices for dental tissue regeneration, ACS applied bio materials 3(2) (2020) 859-868.
[43] A. Mandal, J.R. Clegg, A.C. Anselmo, S. Mitragotri, Hydrogels in the clinic, Bioengineering & translational medicine 5(2) (2020) e10158.
[44] K.-C. Kuo, R.-Z. Lin, H.-W. Tien, P.-Y. Wu, Y.-C. Li, J.M. Melero-Martin, Y.-C. Chen, Bioengineering vascularized tissue constructs using an injectable cell-laden enzymatically crosslinked collagen hydrogel derived from dermal extracellular matrix, Acta biomaterialia 27 (2015) 151-166.
[45] L. Tytgat, A. Dobos, M. Markovic, L. Van Damme, J. Van Hoorick, F. Bray, H. Thienpont, H. Ottevaere, P. Dubruel, A. Ovsianikov, High-resolution 3D bioprinting of photo-cross-linkable recombinant collagen to serve tissue engineering applications, Biomacromolecules 21(10) (2020) 3997-4007.
[46] D.F. Duarte Campos, M. Rohde, M. Ross, P. Anvari, A. Blaeser, M. Vogt, C. Panfil, G.H.F. Yam, J.S. Mehta, H. Fischer, Corneal bioprinting utilizing collagen‐based bioinks and primary human keratocytes, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 107(9) (2019) 1945-1953.
[47] M. Xeroudaki, M. Thangavelu, A. Lennikov, A. Ratnayake, J. Bisevac, G. Petrovski, P. Fagerholm, M. Rafat, N. Lagali, A porous collagen-based hydrogel and implantation method for corneal stromal regeneration and sustained local drug delivery, Scientific reports 10(1) (2020) 16936.
[48] M.T.I. Mredha, N. Kitamura, T. Nonoyama, S. Wada, K. Goto, X. Zhang, T. Nakajima, T. Kurokawa, Y. Takagi, K. Yasuda, Anisotropic tough double network hydrogel from fish collagen and its spontaneous in vivo bonding to bone, Biomaterials 132 (2017) 85-95.
[49] P. Bajaj, R.M. Schweller, A. Khademhosseini, J.L. West, R. Bashir, 3D Biofabrication Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16 (2014) 247-276.
[50] Y.S. Zhang, K. Yue, J. Aleman, K. Mollazadeh-Moghaddam, S.M. Bakht, J.Z. Yang, W.T. Jia, V. Dell'Erba, P. Assawes, S.R. Shin, M.R. Dokmeci, R. Oklu, A. Khademhosseini, 3D Bioprinting for Tissue and Organ Fabrication, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 45(1) (2017) 148-163.
[51] S. Derakhshanfar, R. Mbeleck, K.G. Xu, X.Y. Zhang, W. Zhong, M. Xing, 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances, Bioact Mater 3(2) (2018) 144-156.
[52] R. Chang, B. Starly, W. Sun, C. Culbertson, H. Holtorf, S. Gonda, Freeform bioprinting of liver encapsulated in alginate hydrogels tissue constructs for pharmacokinetic study, (2006).
[53] Y. He, F. Yang, H. Zhao, Q. Gao, B. Xia, J. Fu, Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting, Scientific reports 6(1) (2016) 29977.
[54] A. Blaeser, D.F. Duarte Campos, U. Puster, W. Richtering, M.M. Stevens, H. Fischer, Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity, Advanced healthcare materials 5(3) (2016) 326-333.
[55] N. Paxton, W. Smolan, T. Böck, F. Melchels, J. Groll, T. Jungst, Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability, Biofabrication 9(4) (2017) 044107.
[56] H. Shi, Y. Li, K. Xu, J. Yin, Advantages of photo-curable collagen-based cell-laden bioinks compared to methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) in digital light processing (DLP) and extrusion bioprinting, Materials Today Bio 23 (2023) 100799.
[57] M. Alruwaili, J.A. Lopez, K. McCarthy, E.G. Reynaud, B.J. Rodriguez, Liquid-phase 3D bioprinting of gelatin alginate hydrogels: influence of printing parameters on hydrogel line width and layer height, Bio-Design and Manufacturing 2 (2019) 172-180.
[58] T. Billiet, E. Gevaert, T. De Schryver, M. Cornelissen, P. Dubruel, The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability, Biomaterials 35(1) (2014) 49-62.
[59] Y. Yang, M. Wang, S. Yang, Y. Lin, Q. Zhou, H. Li, T. Tang, Bioprinting of an osteocyte network for biomimetic mineralization, Biofabrication 12(4) (2020) 045013.
[60] N. Diamantides, C. Dugopolski, E. Blahut, S. Kennedy, L.J. Bonassar, High density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of collagen bioinks, Biofabrication 11(4) (2019) 045016.
[61] B.A. Nerger, P.-T. Brun, C.M. Nelson, Microextrusion printing cell-laden networks of type I collagen with patterned fiber alignment and geometry, Soft matter 15(28) (2019) 5728-5738.
[62] Y.B. Kim, H. Lee, G.H. Kim, Strategy to achieve highly porous/biocompatible macroscale cell blocks, using a collagen/genipin-bioink and an optimal 3D printing process, ACS applied materials & interfaces 8(47) (2016) 32230-32240.
[63] M.G. Yeo, G.H. Kim, A cell-printing approach for obtaining hASC-laden scaffolds by using a collagen/polyphenol bioink, Biofabrication 9(2) (2017) 025004.
[64] M. Yeo, J.-S. Lee, W. Chun, G.H. Kim, An innovative collagen-based cell-printing method for obtaining human adipose stem cell-laden structures consisting of core–sheath structures for tissue engineering, Biomacromolecules 17(4) (2016) 1365-1375.
[65] F. Garcia-Villen, A. Guembe, M.R. José, T. Zúñiga, S. Ruiz-Alonso, L. Saenz-del-Burgo, M.I. Jesús, I.R. José, J.L. Pedraz, Characterization and assessment of new fibrillar collagen inks and bioinks for 3D printing and bioprinting, International Journal of Bioprinting 9(3) (2023).
[66] M.S. Kang, M. Kwon, S.Y. Lee, S.H. Lee, H.J. Jo, B. Kim, K.S. Kim, D.-W. Han, In situ crosslinkable collagen-based hydrogels for 3D printing of dermis-mimetic constructs, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 11(4) (2022) 045014.
[67] K. Behan, A. Dufour, O. Garcia, D. Kelly, Methacrylated cartilage ECM-based hydrogels as injectables and bioinks for cartilage tissue engineering, Biomolecules 12(2) (2022) 216.
[68] N.S. Kajave, T. Schmitt, T.-U. Nguyen, A.K. Gaharwar, V. Kishore, Bioglass incorporated methacrylated collagen bioactive ink for 3D printing of bone tissue, Biomedical Materials 16(3) (2021) 035003.
[69] Y. Kang, L. Wang, S. Zhang, B. Liu, H. Gao, H. Jin, L. Xiao, G. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Jiang, Bioactive Patch for Rotator Cuff Repairing via Enhancing Tendon‐to‐Bone Healing: A Large Animal Study and Short‐Term Outcome of a Clinical Trial, Advanced Science 11(31) (2024) 2308443.
[70] W. Zou, X. Li, N. Li, T. Guo, Y. Cai, X. Yang, J. Liang, Y. Sun, Y. Fan, A comparative study of autogenous, allograft and artificial bone substitutes on bone regeneration and immunotoxicity in rat femur defect model, Regenerative biomaterials 8(1) (2021) rbaa040.
[71] D. dos Santos Gomes, R. de Sousa Victor, B.V. de Sousa, G. de Araújo Neves, L.N. de Lima Santana, R.R. Menezes, Ceramic nanofiber materials for wound healing and bone regeneration: a brief review, Materials 15(11) (2022) 3909.
[72] W.S. Khan, F. Rayan, B.S. Dhinsa, D. Marsh, An osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic tissue‐engineered product for trauma and orthopaedic surgery: How far are we?, Stem cells international 2012(1) (2012) 236231.
[73] H.C. Anderson, Matrix vesicles and calcification, Current rheumatology reports 5(3) (2003) 222-226.
[74] S.L. Teitelbaum, Osteoclasts: what do they do and how do they do it?, The American journal of pathology 170(2) (2007) 427-435.
[75] Q. Ding, S. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Zhao, J. Yang, G. Chai, N. Wang, S. Ma, W. Liu, C. Ding, Hydrogel tissue bioengineered scaffolds in bone repair: a review, Molecules 28(20) (2023) 7039.
[76] M. Chen, H. Tan, W. Xu, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Li, T. Zhou, X. Niu, A self-healing, magnetic and injectable biopolymer hydrogel generated by dual cross-linking for drug delivery and bone repair, Acta biomaterialia 153 (2022) 159-177.
[77] Z. Wu, J. Bai, G. Ge, T. Wang, S. Feng, Q. Ma, X. Liang, W. Li, W. Zhang, Y. Xu, Regulating macrophage polarization in high glucose microenvironment using lithium‐modified bioglass‐hydrogel for diabetic bone regeneration, Advanced healthcare materials 11(13) (2022) 2200298.
[78] S. Ansari, P. Sarrion, M.M. Hasani‐Sadrabadi, T. Aghaloo, B.M. Wu, A. Moshaverinia, Regulation of the fate of dental‐derived mesenchymal stem cells using engineered alginate‐GelMA hydrogels, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 105(11) (2017) 2957-2967.
[79] L. Benning, L. Gutzweiler, K. Tröndle, J. Riba, R. Zengerle, P. Koltay, S. Zimmermann, G.B. Stark, G. Finkenzeller, Cytocompatibility testing of hydrogels toward bioprinting of mesenchymal stem cells, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 105(12) (2017) 3231-3241.
[80] S.-A. Oh, H.-Y. Lee, J.H. Lee, T.-H. Kim, J.-H. Jang, H.-W. Kim, I. Wall, Collagen three-dimensional hydrogel matrix carrying basic fibroblast growth factor for the cultivation of mesenchymal stem cells and osteogenic differentiation, Tissue Engineering Part A 18(9-10) (2012) 1087-1100.
[81] J. He, N. Zhang, Y. Zhu, R. Jin, F. Wu, MSC spheroids-loaded collagen hydrogels simultaneously promote neuronal differentiation and suppress inflammatory reaction through PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, Biomaterials 265 (2021) 120448.
[82] S. Zhu, W. Chen, A. Masson, Y.-P. Li, Cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoblast lineage commitment, differentiation, bone formation, and homeostasis, Cell Discovery 10(1) (2024) 71.
[83] H. Hwangbo, H. Lee, E.J. Roh, W. Kim, H.P. Joshi, S.Y. Kwon, U.Y. Choi, I.-B. Han, G.H. Kim, Bone tissue engineering via application of a collagen/hydroxyapatite 4D-printed biomimetic scaffold for spinal fusion, Applied Physics Reviews 8(2) (2021).
[84] S. Toosi, J. Behravan, Osteogenesis and bone remodeling: A focus on growth factors and bioactive peptides, Biofactors 46(3) (2020) 326-340.
[85] A.K. Rajendran, M.S.J. Anthraper, N.S. Hwang, J. Rangasamy, Osteogenesis and angiogenesis promoting bioactive ceramics, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 159 (2024) 100801.
[86] F. Zhao, Z. Yang, H. Xiong, Y. Yan, X. Chen, L. Shao, A bioactive glass functional hydrogel enhances bone augmentation via synergistic angiogenesis, self-swelling and osteogenesis, Bioact Mater 22 (2023) 201-210.
[87] S. Pouraghaei Sevari, J.K. Kim, C. Chen, A. Nasajpour, C.-Y. Wang, P.H. Krebsbach, A. Khademhosseini, S. Ansari, P.S. Weiss, A. Moshaverinia, Whitlockite-enabled hydrogel for craniofacial bone regeneration, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13(30) (2021) 35342-35355.
[88] Y. Pan, Y. Zhao, R. Kuang, H. Liu, D. Sun, T. Mao, K. Jiang, X. Yang, N. Watanabe, K.H. Mayo, Injectable hydrogel-loaded nano-hydroxyapatite that improves bone regeneration and alveolar ridge promotion, Materials Science and Engineering: C 116 (2020) 111158.
[89] Z. Amini, R. Lari, A systematic review of decellularized allograft and xenograft–derived scaffolds in bone tissue regeneration, Tissue and Cell 69 (2021) 101494.
[90] S. Datta, A.P. Rameshbabu, K. Bankoti, M. Roy, C. Gupta, S. Jana, A.K. Das, R. Sen, S. Dhara, Decellularized bone matrix/oleoyl chitosan derived supramolecular injectable hydrogel promotes efficient bone integration, Materials Science and Engineering: C 119 (2021) 111604.
[91] M.S. Lee, D.H. Lee, J. Jeon, G. Tae, Y.M. Shin, H.S. Yang, Biofabrication and application of decellularized bone extracellular matrix for effective bone regeneration, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 83 (2020) 323-332.
[92] V.G. Muir, J.A. Burdick, Chemically modified biopolymers for the formation of biomedical hydrogels, Chemical reviews 121(18) (2020) 10908-10949.
[93] S. Potorac, M. Popa, L. Picton, V. Dulong, L. Verestiuc, D.L. Cerf, Collagen functionalized with unsaturated cyclic anhydrides—interactions in solution and solid state, Biopolymers 101(3) (2014) 228-236.
[94] T. Lai, J. Yu, W. Tsai, Gelatin methacrylate/carboxybetaine methacrylate hydrogels with tunable crosslinking for controlled drug release, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 4(13) (2016) 2304-2313.
[95] G.K. Reddy, C.S. Enwemeka, A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in biological tissues, Clinical biochemistry 29(3) (1996) 225-229.
[96] R.E. Neuman, M.A. Logan, The determination of hydroxyproline, J Biol Chem 184(1) (1950) 299-306.
[97] S.V. Murphy, A. Atala, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs, Nat Biotechnol 32(8) (2014) 773-785.
[98] S. Boularaoui, G. Al Hussein, K.A. Khan, N. Christoforou, C. Stefanini, An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability, Bioprinting 20 (2020) e00093.
[99] H. Ravanbakhsh, V. Karamzadeh, G. Bao, L. Mongeau, D. Juncker, Y.S. Zhang, Emerging technologies in multi‐material bioprinting, Advanced Materials 33(49) (2021) 2104730.
[100] Z. Wang, R. Abdulla, B. Parker, R. Samanipour, S. Ghosh, K. Kim, A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks, Biofabrication 7(4) (2015) 045009.
[101] I. Parodi, D. Di Lisa, L. Pastorino, S. Scaglione, M.M. Fato, 3D bioprinting as a powerful technique for recreating the tumor microenvironment, Gels 9(6) (2023) 482.
[102] R.F. Pereira, P.J. Bartolo, 3D bioprinting of photocrosslinkable hydrogel constructs, J Appl Polym Sci 132(48) (2015) 1-15.
[103] W.L. Ng, J.M. Lee, M. Zhou, Y.-W. Chen, K.-X.A. Lee, W.Y. Yeong, Y.-F. Shen, Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges, Biofabrication 12(2) (2020) 022001.
[104] X.F. Cui, K. Breitenkamp, M.G. Finn, M. Lotz, D.D. D'Lima, Direct Human Cartilage Repair Using Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Technology, Tissue Engineering Part A 18(11-12) (2012) 1304-1312.
[105] G.F. Gao, T. Yonezawa, K. Hubbell, G.H. Dai, X.F. Cui, Inkjet-bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with human mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage formation with minimal printhead clogging, Biotechnol J 10(10) (2015) 1568-1577.
[106] B.S. Kwak, W. Choi, J.-w. Jeon, J.-I. Won, G.Y. Sung, B. Kim, J.H. Sung, In vitro 3D skin model using gelatin methacrylate hydrogel, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 66 (2018) 254-261.
[107] B.J. Klotz, D. Gawlitta, A.J. Rosenberg, J. Malda, F.P. Melchels, Gelatin-methacryloyl hydrogels: towards biofabrication-based tissue repair, Trends in biotechnology 34(5) (2016) 394-407.
[108] M. Poldervaart, B. Goversen, M. de Ruijter, A. Abbadessa, F. Melchels, F. Öner, 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity, PLoS ONE 12(6) (2017) e0177628.
[109] B. Velasco-Rodriguez, T. Diaz-Vidal, L.C. Rosales-Rivera, C.A. García-González, C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, A. Al-Modlej, V. Domínguez-Arca, G. Prieto, S. Barbosa, J.F.A. Soltero Martínez, P. Taboada, Hybrid methacrylated gelatin and hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds. Preparation and systematic characterization for prospective tissue engineering applications, International Journal of Molecular Science 22 (2021) 6758.
[110] Y. Liu, S.C. Ng, J.S. Yu, W.B. Tsai, Modification and crosslinking of gelatin-based biomaterials as tissue adhesives, Colloid Surface B 174 (2019) 316-323.
[111] G. Ying, N. Jiang, C. Yu, Y.S. Zhang, Three-dimensional bioprinting of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), Bio-Design and Manufacturing 1 (2018) 215-224.
[112] W.T. Brinkman, K. Nagapudi, B.S. Thomas, E.L. Chaikof, Photo-Cross-Linking of Type I Collagen Gels in the Presence of Smooth Muscle Cells: Mechanical Properties, Cell Viability, and Function, Biomacromolecules 4 (2003) 890-895.
[113] Z. Wu, J. Liu, J. Lin, L. Lu, J. Tian, L. Li, C. Zhou, Novel Digital Light Processing Printing Strategy Using a Collagen-Based Bioink with Prospective Cross-Linker Procyanidins, Biomacromolecules 23 (2022) 240−252.
[114] M.K. Maher, J.F. White, V. Glattauer, Z. Yue, T.C. Hughes, J.A.M. Ramshaw, G.G. Wallace, Variation in Hydrogel Formation and Network Structure for Telo-, Atelo- and Methacrylated Collagens, Polymers 14 (2022) 1775.
[115] K. Yang, J. Sun, Z. Guo, J. Yang, D. Wei, Y. Tan, L. Guo, H. Luo, H. Fan, X. Zhang, Methacrylamide-modified collagen hydrogel with improved anti-actin-mediated matrix contraction behavior, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 6(45) (2018) 7543-7555.
[116] Y. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Xu, J. Xia, Z. Xu, S. Zhu, M. Jin, Preparation of Chitosan/Recombinant Human Collagen-Based Photo-Responsive Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting, Gels 8(5) (2022) 314.
[117] A. Schwab, R. Levato, M. D’Este, S. Piluso, D. Eglin, J. Malda, Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting, Chemical reviews 120(19) (2020) 11028-11055.
[118] W.-B.T. Wen-Hsuan Chou, The development of injectable extracellular matrix based hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering College of Engineering National Taiwan University Master Thesis (2021).
[119] W.-B.T. I-Hsiang Chen, Characterization and Burn Wound Dressing Application of Anhydride Modified Collagen, Department of Chemical Engineering College of Engineering National Taiwan University Master Thesis, 2020.
[120] J. Matejkova, D. Kanokova, M. Supova, R. Matejka, A New Method for the Production of High-Concentration Collagen Bioinks with Semiautonomic Preparation, Gels 10(1) (2024) 66.
[121] E.O. Osidak, V.I. Kozhukhov, M.S. Osidak, S.P. Domogatsky, Collagen as bioink for bioprinting: A comprehensive review, International journal of bioprinting 6(3) (2020).
[122] N. Diamantides, L. Wang, T. Pruiksma, J. Siemiatkoski, C. Dugopolski, S. Shortkroff, S. Kennedy, L.J. Bonassar, Correlating rheological properties and printability of collagen bioinks: the effects of riboflavin photocrosslinking and pH, Biofabrication 9(3) (2017) 034102.
[123] A. Reyes, V. Bubnovich, R. Bustos, M. Vásquez, R. Vega, E. Scheuermann, Comparative study of different process conditions of freeze drying of ‘Murtilla’berry, Drying Technology 28(12) (2010) 1416-1425.
[124] A. Veiga, I.V. Silva, M.M. Duarte, A.L. Oliveira, Current trends on protein driven bioinks for 3D printing, Pharmaceutics 13(9) (2021) 1444.
[125] P. Amorim, M. d’Ávila, R. Anand, P. Moldenaers, P. Van Puyvelde, V. Bloemen, Insights on shear rheology of inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting, Bioprinting 22 (2021) e00129.
[126] Y. Weng, M. Li, M.J. Tan, S. Qian, Design 3D printing cementitious materials via Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model, Construction and Building Materials 163 (2018) 600-610.
[127] E. Mancha Sánchez, J.C. Gómez-Blanco, E. López Nieto, J.G. Casado, A. Macías-García, M.A. Díaz Díez, J.P. Carrasco-Amador, D. Torrejón Martín, F.M. Sánchez-Margallo, J.B. Pagador, Hydrogels for bioprinting: A systematic review of hydrogels synthesis, bioprinting parameters, and bioprinted structures behavior, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8 (2020) 776.
[128] S. Chae, D.-W. Cho, Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering, Acta biomaterialia 156 (2023) 4-20.
[129] M. Samandari, J. Quint, A. Rodríguez‐delaRosa, I. Sinha, O. Pourquié, A. Tamayol, Bioinks and bioprinting strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering, Advanced Materials 34(12) (2022) 2105883.
[130] J.M. Lee, S.K.Q. Suen, W.L. Ng, W.C. Ma, W.Y. Yeong, Bioprinting of collagen: considerations, potentials, and applications, Macromolecular Bioscience 21(1) (2021) 2000280.
[131] Z. Fu, S. Naghieh, C. Xu, C. Wang, W. Sun, X. Chen, Printability in extrusion bioprinting, Biofabrication 13(3) (2021) 033001.
[132] S. Tian, H. Zhao, N. Lewinski, Key parameters and applications of extrusion-based bioprinting, Bioprinting 23 (2021) e00156.
[133] Z. Zhang, Y. Jin, J. Yin, C. Xu, R. Xiong, K. Christensen, B.R. Ringeisen, D.B. Chrisey, Y. Huang, Evaluation of bioink printability for bioprinting applications, Applied Physics Reviews 5(4) (2018).
[134] A. Habib, V. Sathish, S. Mallik, B. Khoda, 3D printability of alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel, Materials 11(3) (2018) 454.
[135] T. Jungst, W. Smolan, K. Schacht, T. Scheibel, J.r. Groll, Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels, Chemical reviews 116(3) (2016) 1496-1539.
[136] X. Lan, A. Adesida, Y. Boluk, Rheological and viscoelastic properties of collagens and their role in bioprinting by micro-extrusion, Biomedical Materials 17(6) (2022) 062005.
[137] H. Ding, N.P. Illsley, R.C. Chang, 3D bioprinted GelMA based models for the study of trophoblast cell invasion, Scientific Reports 9(1) (2019) 18854.
[138] L. Siebert, E. Luna‐Cerón, L.E. García‐Rivera, J. Oh, J. Jang, D.A. Rosas‐Gómez, M.D. Pérez‐Gómez, G. Maschkowitz, H. Fickenscher, D. Oceguera‐Cuevas, Light‐controlled growth factors release on tetrapodal ZnO‐incorporated 3D‐printed hydrogels for developing smart wound scaffold, Advanced functional materials 31(22) (2021) 2007555.
[139] Q. Li, Z. Jiang, L. Ma, J. Yin, Z. Gao, L. Shen, H. Yang, Z. Cui, H. Ye, H. Zhou, A versatile embedding medium for freeform bioprinting with multi-crosslinking methods, Biofabrication 14(3) (2022) 035022.
[140] T.J. Hinton, Q. Jallerat, R.N. Palchesko, J.H. Park, M.S. Grodzicki, H.-J. Shue, M.H. Ramadan, A.R. Hudson, A.W. Feinberg, Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels, Science advances 1(9) (2015) e1500758.
[141] E.H. Schemitsch, Size matters: defining critical in bone defect size!, Journal of orthopaedic trauma 31 (2017) S20-S22.
[142] A.H. Schmidt, Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard?, Injury 52 (2021) S18-S22.
[143] M. Chatelet, F. Afota, C. Savoldelli, Review of bone graft and implant survival rate: A comparison between autogenous bone block versus guided bone regeneration, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 123(2) (2022) 222-227.
[144] E. García-Gareta, M.J. Coathup, G.W. Blunn, Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration, Bone 81 (2015) 112-121.
[145] L. Fan, S. Chen, M. Yang, Y. Liu, J. Liu, Metallic materials for bone repair, Advanced Healthcare Materials 13(3) (2024) 2302132.
[146] R. Arambula-Maldonado, K. Mequanint, Carbon-based electrically conductive materials for bone repair and regeneration, Materials Advances 3(13) (2022) 5186-5206.
[147] D. Govindarajan, S. Saravanan, S. Sudhakar, S. Vimalraj, Graphene: A Multifaceted Carbon-Based Material for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications, ACS omega 9(1) (2023) 67-80.
[148] C. Fama, G.J. Kaye, R. Flores, C.D. Lopez, J.M. Bekisz, A. Torroni, N. Tovar, P.G. Coelho, L. Witek, Three-dimensionally-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds: Construct effects on bone regeneration, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 32(3) (2021) 1177-1181.
[149] C.W. Cheah, N.M. Al-Namnam, M.N. Lau, G.S. Lim, R. Raman, P. Fairbairn, W.C. Ngeow, Synthetic material for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration: where are we now, and where are we heading next?, Materials 14(20) (2021) 6123.
[150] M.I. Alvarez Echazu, O. Perna, C.E. Olivetti, P.E. Antezana, S. Municoy, M.V. Tuttolomondo, J.M. Galdopórpora, G.S. Alvarez, D.G. Olmedo, M.F. Desimone, Recent advances in synthetic and natural biomaterials‐based therapy for bone defects, Macromolecular Bioscience 22(4) (2022) 2100383.
[151] X. Lin, S. Patil, Y.-G. Gao, A. Qian, The bone extracellular matrix in bone formation and regeneration, Frontiers in pharmacology 11 (2020) 757.
[152] A.M. Ferreira, P. Gentile, V. Chiono, G. Ciardelli, Collagen for bone tissue regeneration, Acta biomaterialia 8(9) (2012) 3191-3200.
[153] S. Yue, H. He, B. Li, T. Hou, Hydrogel as a biomaterial for bone tissue engineering: A review, Nanomaterials 10(8) (2020) 1511.
[154] A. Wierzbicka, M. Bartniak, J. Waśko, B. Kolesińska, J. Grabarczyk, D. Bociaga, The Impact of Gelatin and Fish Collagen on Alginate Hydrogel Properties: A Comparative Study, Gels 10(8) (2024) 491.
[155] F. Tabatabaei, K. Moharamzadeh, L. Tayebi, Fibroblast encapsulation in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) versus collagen hydrogel as substrates for oral mucosa tissue engineering, Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 10(4) (2020) 573-577.
[156] A. Hoshikawa, Y. Nakayama, T. Matsuda, H. Oda, K. Nakamura, K. Mabuchi, Encapsulation of chondrocytes in photopolymerizable styrenated gelatin for cartilage tissue engineering, Tissue engineering 12(8) (2006) 2333-2341.
[157] C. Chen, Z. Li, C. Xu, M. Kang, C.S. Lee, T. Aghaloo, M. Lee, Self‐Assembled Nanocomposite Hydrogels as Carriers for Demineralized Bone Matrix Particles and Enhanced Bone Repair, Advanced Healthcare Materials 13(10) (2024) 2303592.
[158] D. Li, Z. Yang, X. Zhao, Y. Luo, Y. Ou, P. Kang, M. Tian, A bone regeneration strategy via dual delivery of demineralized bone matrix powder and hypoxia-pretreated bone marrow stromal cells using an injectable self-healing hydrogel, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 9(2) (2021) 479-493.
[159] X. Yu, S. Jiang, D. Li, S.G. Shen, X. Wang, K. Lin, Osteoimmunomodulatory bioinks for 3D bioprinting achieve complete regeneration of critical-sized bone defects, Composites Part B: Engineering 273 (2024) 111256.
[160] X. Wu, Y. Huo, Z. Ci, Y. Wang, W. Xu, B. Bai, J. Hao, G. Hu, M. Yu, W. Ren, Biomimetic porous hydrogel scaffolds enabled vascular ingrowth and osteogenic differentiation for vascularized tissue-engineered bone regeneration, Applied Materials Today 27 (2022) 101478.
[161] F. Paduano, M. Marrelli, L.J. White, K.M. Shakesheff, M. Tatullo, Odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells on hydrogel scaffolds derived from decellularized bone extracellular matrix and collagen type I, PloS one 11(2) (2016) e0148225.
[162] X. Zhang, Y. He, P. Huang, G. Jiang, M. Zhang, F. Yu, W. Zhang, G. Fu, Y. Wang, W. Li, A novel mineralized high strength hydrogel for enhancing cell adhesion and promoting skull bone regeneration in situ, Composites Part B: Engineering 197 (2020) 108183.
[163] X. Wu, T. Zhang, B. Hoff, S. Suvarnapathaki, D. Lantigua, C. McCarthy, B. Wu, G. Camci‐Unal, Mineralized hydrogels induce bone regeneration in critical size cranial defects, Advanced Healthcare Materials 10(4) (2021) 2001101.
[164] L. Wang, D. Li, Y. Huang, R. Mao, B. Zhang, F. Luo, P. Gu, P. Song, X. Ge, J. Lu, Bionic Mineralized 3D‐Printed Scaffolds with Enhanced In Situ Mineralization for Cranial Bone Regeneration, Advanced Functional Materials 34(3) (2024) 2309042.
[165] S.-Y. Wu, W.-B. Tsai, Development of an In Situ Photo-Crosslinking Antimicrobial Collagen Hydrogel for the Treatment of Infected Wounds, Polymers 15(24) (2023) 4701.
[166] K. Greco, L. Francis, M. Somasundaram, G. Greco, N.R. English, J.A. Roether, A.R. Boccaccini, P. Sibbons, T. Ansari, Characterisation of porcine dermis scaffolds decellularised using a novel non-enzymatic method for biomedical applications, Journal of biomaterials applications 30(2) (2015) 239-253.
[167] M.F. Pittenger, A.M. Mackay, S.C. Beck, R.K. Jaiswal, R. Douglas, J.D. Mosca, M.A. Moorman, D.W. Simonetti, S. Craig, D.R. Marshak, Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells, science 284(5411) (1999) 143-147.
[168] P.-Y. Wang, W.-B. Tsai, N.H. Voelcker, Screening of rat mesenchymal stem cell behaviour on polydimethylsiloxane stiffness gradients, Acta biomaterialia 8(2) (2012) 519-530.
[169] W. Pustlauk, B. Paul, S. Brueggemeier, M. Gelinsky, A. Bernhardt, Modulation of chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in jellyfish collagen scaffolds by cell density and culture medium, Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 11(6) (2017) 1710-1722.
[170] M. Zhang, R.M. Powers Jr, L. Wolfinbarger Jr, Effect (s) of the demineralization process on the osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix, Journal of periodontology 68(11) (1997) 1085-1092.
[171] M.E. Grawish, L.M. Grawish, H.M. Grawish, M.M. Grawish, A.A. Holiel, N. Sultan, S.A. El-Negoly, Demineralized dentin matrix for dental and alveolar bone tissues regeneration: an innovative scope review, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 19(4) (2022) 687-701.
[172] AATB, AATB Standards for Tissue Banking, 2020.
[173] A. Bigham, S. Dehghani, Z. Shafiei, S. Torabi Nezhad, Xenogenic demineralized bone matrix and fresh autogenous cortical bone effects on experimental bone healing: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 9 (2008) 73-80.
[174] M.R. URIST, B.S. STRATES, Bone Formation in Implants of Partially and Wholly Demineralized Bone Matrix: Including Observations on Acetone-fixed Intra and Extracellular Proteins, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007) 71 (1970) 271-278.
[175] P. Human, P. Zilla, Characterization of the immune response to valve bioprostheses and its role in primary tissue failure, The Annals of thoracic surgery 71(5) (2001) S385-S388.
[176] A. Gilpin, Y. Yang, Decellularization strategies for regenerative medicine: from processing techniques to applications, BioMed research international 2017(1) (2017) 9831534.
[177] M.J. Sawkins, W. Bowen, P. Dhadda, H. Markides, L.E. Sidney, A.J. Taylor, F.R. Rose, S.F. Badylak, K.M. Shakesheff, L.J. White, Hydrogels derived from demineralized and decellularized bone extracellular matrix, Acta biomaterialia 9(8) (2013) 7865-7873.
[178] V.K. Kuna, N. Kvarnström, E. Elebring, S.S. Holgersson, Isolation and decellularization of a whole porcine pancreas, JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments) (140) (2018) e58302.
[179] B. Dozza, I.G. Lesci, S. Duchi, E. Della Bella, L. Martini, F. Salamanna, M. Falconi, S. Cinotti, M. Fini, E. Lucarelli, When size matters: differences in demineralized bone matrix particles affect collagen structure, mesenchymal stem cell behavior, and osteogenic potential, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 105(4) (2017) 1019-1033.
[180] K.J. Hogan, H. Öztatlı, M.R. Perez, S. Si, R. Umurhan, E. Jui, Z. Wang, E.Y. Jiang, S.R. Han, M. Diba, Development of photoreactive demineralized bone matrix 3D printing colloidal inks for bone tissue engineering, Regenerative Biomaterials 10 (2023) rbad090.
[181] R. Murugan, S. Ramakrishna, Modification of demineralized bone matrix by a chemical route, Journal of Materials Chemistry 14(13) (2004) 2041-2045.
[182] L. Dong, Q. Liu, Y. Gao, H. Jia, W. Dai, L. Guo, H. Fan, Y. Fan, X. Zhang, The effect of collagen hydrogels on chondrocyte behaviors through restricting the contraction of cell/hydrogel constructs, Regenerative Biomaterials 8(4) (2021) rbab030.
[183] M. Wu, X. Chen, J. Xu, H. Zhang, Freeze-thaw and solvent-exchange strategy to generate physically cross-linked organogels and hydrogels of curdlan with tunable mechanical properties, Carbohydrate Polymers 278 (2022) 119003.
[184] E. Aytekin, M.T. Vurat, A.E. Elçin, Y.M. Elçin, Decellularized Bone Matrix/45S5 Bioactive Glass Biocomposite Hydrogel‐Based Constructs with Angiogenic and Osteogenic Properties: Ex Ovo and Ex Vivo Evaluations, Macromolecular Bioscience 24(4) (2024) 2300295.
[185] N.Y. Patrawalla, N.S. Kajave, V. Kishore, A comparative study of bone bioactivity and osteogenic potential of different bioceramics in methacrylated collagen hydrogels, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 111(2) (2023) 224-233.
[186] J.M. Townsend, E.A. Kiyotake, J.T. Easley, H.B. Seim III, H.L. Stewart, K.-M. Fung, M.S. Detamore, Comparison of a thiolated demineralized bone matrix hydrogel to a clinical product control for regeneration of large sheep cranial defects, Materialia 27 (2023) 101690.
[187] J.M. Townsend, G. Sali, H.B. Homburg, N.T. Cassidy, M.E. Sanders, K.-M. Fung, B.T. Andrews, R.J. Nudo, B.N. Bohnstedt, M.S. Detamore, Thiolated bone and tendon tissue particles covalently bound in hydrogels for in vivo calvarial bone regeneration, Acta biomaterialia 104 (2020) 66-75.
[188] B. Conrad, F. Yang, Hydroxyapatite-coated gelatin microribbon scaffolds induce rapid endogenous cranial bone regeneration in vivo, Biomaterials Advances 140 (2022) 213050.
[189] S. Mansour, S. El-Dek, M. Ahmed, S. Abd-Elwahab, M. Ahmed, Effect of preparation conditions on the nanostructure of hydroxyapatite and brushite phases, Applied Nanoscience 6 (2016) 991-1000.
[190] L. Šimková, N.O. Gorodylova, Ž. Dohnalová, P. Šulcová, Influence of precipitation conditions on the synthesis of hydroxyapatite, Ceramics-Silikaty, volume 62, issue: 3 (2018).
[191] M. Moosavifar, H. Parsaei, S. Hosseini, S.M. Mirmontazeri, R. Ahadi, S. Ahadian, F.B. Engel, K. Roshanbinfar, Biomimetic Organic–Inorganic Nanocomposite Scaffolds to Regenerate Cranial Bone Defects in a Rat Animal Model, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 8(3) (2022) 1258-1270.
[192] K. Gkioni, S.C. Leeuwenburgh, T.E. Douglas, A.G. Mikos, J.A. Jansen, Mineralization of hydrogels for bone regeneration, Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 16(6) (2010) 577-585.
[193] M. Rajabi, J.D. Cabral, S. Saunderson, M. Gould, M.A. Ali, Development and optimisation of hydroxyapatite-polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogel inks for 3D printing of bone tissue engineered scaffolds, Biomedical Materials 18(6) (2023) 065009.
[194] C. Machado, C. Correa, G. Medrado, M. Leite, A. Goes, Ectopic expression of telomerase enhances osteopontin and osteocalcin expression during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells from elder donors, Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine 5(2) (2009) 49.
[195] P. Bourgine, C. Le Magnen, S. Pigeot, J. Geurts, A. Scherberich, I. Martin, Combination of immortalization and inducible death strategies to generate a human mesenchymal stromal cell line with controlled survival, Stem cell research 12(2) (2014) 584-598.
[196] A. Tsvetkova, I. Vakhrushev, Y.B. Basok, A. Grigor’Ev, L. Kirsanova, A.Y. Lupatov, V. Sevastianov, K. Yarygin, Chondrogeneic potential of MSC from different sources in spheroid culture, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 170 (2021) 528-536.
[197] S. Ichinose, T. Muneta, H. Koga, Y. Segawa, M. Tagami, K. Tsuji, I. Sekiya, Morphological differences during in vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-, synovium-MSCs, and chondrocytes, Laboratory investigation 90(2) (2010) 210-221.
[198] B. Zhou, X. Jiang, X. Zhou, W. Tan, H. Luo, S. Lei, Y. Yang, GelMA-based bioactive hydrogel scaffolds with multiple bone defect repair functions: therapeutic strategies and recent advances, Biomaterials Research 27(1) (2023) 86.
[199] Y. Wu, X. Zhang, B. Tan, Y. Shan, X. Zhao, J. Liao, Near-infrared light control of GelMA/PMMA/PDA hydrogel with mild photothermal therapy for skull regeneration, Biomaterials Advances 133 (2022) 112641.
[200] R. Wang, X. He, J. Bai, S. Su, R. Zhou, S. Gao, H. Liu, F. Zhou, Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles-Reinforced GelMA Hydrogel Loading Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Osteogenic and Inflammatory Regulatory Capacity for Bone Defect Repair, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 16(49) (2024) 67373-67384.
[201] S. Kim, M. Lee, Rational design of hydrogels to enhance osteogenic potential, Chemistry of Materials 32(22) (2020) 9508-9530.
[202] W. Jin, Y. Jin, P. Duan, H. Wu, L. Zhang, Q. Du, H. Pan, R. Tang, C. Shao, Promotion of collagen mineralization and dentin repair by succinates, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 10(30) (2022) 5826-5834.
[203] Q. Meng, Z. Man, L. Dai, H. Huang, X. Zhang, X. Hu, Z. Shao, J. Zhu, J. Zhang, X. Fu, A composite scaffold of MSC affinity peptide-modified demineralized bone matrix particles and chitosan hydrogel for cartilage regeneration, Scientific Reports 5(1) (2015) 17802.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101362-
dc.description.abstract膠原蛋白是脊椎動物中主要的細胞外基質(ECM),在細胞貼附、增殖和分化等特定生物功能中發揮著重要作用。然而,膠原蛋白以其具有極高強度的水不溶性纖維結構著稱,無法溶解於中性或生理緩衝液中,從而形成非均相的懸浮液。儘管膠原蛋白可以溶於酸性緩衝液,但這種條件與細胞包裹不相容。因此,膠原蛋白在3D生物列印和骨再生應用中的使用頻率較低,其降解衍生物明膠則更常被採用。本研究旨在開發一種可溶於水的光交聯膠原蛋白,用作3D生物列印的生物墨水以及骨再生的水凝膠。
本研究介紹了一種創新的中性可溶光交聯之馬來酸酐改質膠原蛋白(ColME),該材料非常適合作為水凝膠的前驅物。ColME的改質通過化學修飾牛I型膠原蛋白與馬來酸酐反應合成,實現了高接支率(~92%),這種改質提高了膠原蛋白在生理pH環境中的溶解性,並改變了其等電點至pH 3.5。研究證實,這種修飾在不破壞膠原蛋白三螺旋結構的情況下完成。此外,該修飾使膠原蛋白具有可進行紫外光交聯的烯基官能基,並在光起始劑加入下進行光交聯。
於3D生物列印領域,甲基丙烯酸化明膠(GelMA)被認為是生物墨水的黃金標準。然而,其流動性的限制導致生物可列印範圍較窄,相比之下,ColME的列印性更為優越。為了優化ColME的生物列印參數,調整了幾個關鍵因素,包括生物墨水濃度、擠出壓力、噴嘴速度和溫度。結果表明,降低列印溫度和減少噴嘴尺寸可顯著提高列印網格圖案的列印品質。並且,提高生物墨水濃度和噴嘴速度可增強列印性能,使其數值(Printability)超過0.9。此外,間歇性光交聯的應用促進了結構穩固的3D多層結構的發展,使複雜組織的穩定製造成為可能。細胞活性測試表明,包裹在ColME基質中(1.2–1.8%)的纖維母細胞(L929)在生物列印後保持了較高的活性(>70%)。整體而言,本研究將ColME定位為製造耐用且具有生物活性的3D組織的卓越生物墨水。
除了支持細胞黏附和增殖等基本生物學功能外,ColME水凝膠還能選擇性促進羥基磷灰石(HAp)的形成和成骨分化能力,為骨缺損修復提供了一種新型的基於細胞外基質(ECM)的策略。為了進一步增強其機械性質、細胞增殖和成骨潛能,研究人員將馬來酸酐修飾的去細胞和去鈣化豬骨基質(mDBMp)摻入水凝膠配方中。結果表明,與GelMA水凝膠相比,在複合水凝膠中培養的永生化人類骨髓間質幹細胞(hBMSCs)的DNA含量提高了3.3倍,鈣沉積量增加了3.9倍。這款以ECM為基礎的水凝膠、骨基質和羥基磷灰石結晶的仿生材料,在骨組織工程領域展現出巨大的應用潛力。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractCollagen, a major extracellular matrix (ECM) in vertebrates, plays a vital role in their particular biological functions, including cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. However, collagen is known for its water-insoluble fibrous structure of great strength, but could not be dissolved in neutral or physiological buffers, forming non-homogeneous solution. Moreover, collagen mainly dissolves in acidic buffers, this condition is incompatible with cell encapsulation, while collagen has been reported with weak mechanical properties. Consequently, collagen composite has been commonly applied to tissue engineering, while its degraded derivative, gelatin, being more commonly employed. This study aimed to develop a water-soluble photocrosslinkable collagen as a bioink for bioprinting applications and as a stiff hydrogel for bone tissue engineering.
This study introduces a novel photocrosslinkable collagen maleate (maleic anhydride–modified type I collagen; ColME) that is soluble at neutral pH and serves as an ideal hydrogel precursor. ColME was synthesized by chemically modifying bovine type I collagen with maleic anhydride, achieving a high substitution ratio (~92%) that shifted the isoelectric point to pH 3.5, rendering the collagen anionic and enhancing its solubility under physiological conditions. Importantly, the modification introduced crosslinkable alkene groups, enabling photocrosslinking upon UV irradiation in the presence of a photoinitiator.
Within the realm of bioprinting, gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) is considered a gold standard bioink. However, its limited fluidity poses challenges, resulting in a narrow bioprinting window compared to ColME. To optimize the bioprinting parameters for ColME, adjustments were made to a few key factors, including bioink concentration, extrusion pressure, nozzle speed, and temperature. The results showed that lower printing temperatures and smaller nozzle diameters substantially improved the structural fidelity of printed grid patterns. In addition, increasing the bioink concentration and nozzle speed enhanced printability, achieving values exceeding 0.9. Additionally, the application of intermittent photocrosslinking facilitated the development of structurally robust 3D multilayered constructs, enabling the stable fabrication of complex tissues. Cell viability assays showed that encapsulated fibroblast (L929) within the ColME matrix (1.2–1.8%) maintained high viability (>70%) after bioprinting. Overall, the study positioning ColME as an outstanding bioink for the creation of durable, bioactive 3D tissues.
Beyond supporting essential biological functions such as cell adhesion and proliferation, the ColME hydrogel also promotes selective hydroxyapatite (HAp) formation and osteogenic differentiation, providing a novel ECM-based strategy for bone defect compensation. To further enhance mechanical properties, cell proliferation, and osteogenic potential, maleic anhydride-modified, demineralized, and decellularized bone matrix particles (mDBMp) were incorporated into the hydrogel formulation. As a result, immortalized human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) cultured in the composite hydrogel exhibited 3.3-fold higher DNA content and 3.9-fold greater calcium deposition compared with those in GelMA hydrogels. This biomimicry of ECM-based hydrogel, bone matrix, hydroxyapatite crystals represent a promising candidate in bone tissue engineering.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-01-27T16:13:14Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-01-27T16:13:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 II
致謝 IV
摘要 VI
ABSTRACT VIII
CONTENT X
LIST OF FIGURES XIV
LIST OF TABLES XX
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. COLLAGEN AND ITS DERIVATIVES 1
1.1.1. Collagen 1
1.1.2. Gelatin 3
1.2. CHEMICAL MODIFICATION ON PROTEIN 4
1.3. FORMATION OF HYDROGEL 5
1.4. COLLAGEN-BASED HYDROGELS AND THEIR ISSUES 7
1.4.1. Parameters of Collagen Hydrogels 8
1.4.2. Chemically Crosslinked Collagen Hydrogel and Its Precursor 9
1.5. IN VITRO AND IN VIVO APPLICATION OF COLLAGEN HYDROGEL 12
1.6. FABRICATION OF HYDROGEL THROUGH BIOPRINTING 14
1.6.1. Structural Integrity and Biocompatibility 15
1.6.2. Hydrogel of Collagen and Its Derivatives via Bioprinting 17
1.7. HYDROGELS FOR BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING 22
1.7.1. Osteoconduction, Osteoinduction, and Osetogenesis to Bone Formation 23
1.7.2. Promoting Osteogenic Differentiation from Hydrogel 24
1.7.3. Enhancing Extent of Osteogenic Differentiation Based on Hydrogel 26
1.8. RESEARCH MOTIVATION 30
1.9. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 31
1.10. FIGURES 32
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 37
2.1. CHEMICALS 37
2.2. EXPERIMENTAL MATERIALS 38
2.3. SOLUTION FORMULA 41
2.4. SYNTHESIS OF COLLAGEN MALEATE (COLME) 41
2.5. SYNTHESIS OF GELATIN METHACRYLATE (GELMA) 42
2.6. CHARACTERIZATION OF COLME 43
2.7. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 44
CHAPTER 3 CHARACTERIZATION AND APPLICATION OF PHOTOCROSSLINKABLE COLLAGEN MALEATE AS BIOINK IN EXTRUSION-BASED 3D BIOPRINTING 47
3.1. INTRODUCTION 47
3.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 49
3.2.1. Chemicals 49
3.2.2. Solution Formula 51
3.2.3. Characterization of ColME 52
3.2.4. Rheological Analysis of Solutions 52
3.2.5. Preparation of Bioink and 3D Bioprinter 53
3.2.6. Characterization of printed grid structure 54
3.2.7. Fabrication of multilayered 3D bioprinted structure 54
3.2.8. Assessment of Cell Viability in 3D Printed ColME Hydrogels 55
3.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 55
3.3.1. Physiochemical Characterization of ColME 55
3.3.2. Rheological properties of native collagen, gelatin and their derivatives 59
3.3.3. Optimization of Bioprinting Parameters for Enhanced Printability and Structural Integrity of ColME Hydrogels 61
3.3.4. Influence of Cartridge Temperature and Nozzle Size on the Printing Quality of ColME Hydrogels 66
3.3.5. Optimizing Multilayered 3D Structures of ColME Bioprinting 67
3.3.6. Cell Viability in Extruded ColME Filaments 69
3.4. CONCLUSION 72
3.5. FIGURES AND TABLES 74
CHAPTER 4 FABRICATION OF A PHOTOCROSSLINKABLE COLLAGEN–BONE MATRIX IN HYDROGEL FOR BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING 93
4.1. INTRODUCTION 93
4.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 96
4.2.1. Chemicals 96
4.2.2. Solution Formula 100
4.2.3. Preparation of Demineralized and Decellularized Bone Matrix Particles (DBMp) 102
4.2.4. Characterization and Modification of Demineralized and Decellularized Bone Matrix Particles (DBMp) 103
4.2.5. Fabrication and Characterization of Bulk Hydrogels 104
4.2.6. Fabrication and Characterization of Mineralized Hydrogels 106
4.2.7. Evaluation of Multipotency, Cell Viability, and Proliferation of MSCs 106
4.2.8. Evaluation of Cell Viability and Proliferation of hBMSCs Encapsulated in Bulk Hydrogels 109
4.2.9. Evaluation of Osteogenic Differentiation of hBMSCs Encapsulated in Bulk Hydrogels 110
4.2.10. Histochemical Staining of Cryosections 111
4.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 112
4.3.1. Characterization of Demineralized and Decellularized Bone Matrix Particles (DBMp) 112
4.3.2. Characterization of Hydrogel Incorporated with Modified Bone Matrix Particles (mDBMp) 114
4.3.3. Mineralization of Hydrogels 117
4.3.4. Differentiation of Primary and Immortalized MSCs 120
4.3.5. Cell Viability and Proliferation of MSCs in Hydrogels 122
4.3.6. Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of hBMSCs Encapsulated in GelMA and ColME-Based Hydrogels 123
4.4. CONCLUSION 128
4.5. FIGURES 130
CHAPTER 5 GENERAL CONCLUSION 149
CHAPTER 6 APPENDIX 155
CHAPTER 7 REFERENCES 161
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject膠原蛋白-
dc.subject馬來酸酐改質膠原蛋白-
dc.subject3D生物列印-
dc.subject光交聯-
dc.subject列印性能-
dc.subject水凝膠-
dc.subject明膠-
dc.subject甲基丙烯酸化明膠-
dc.subject骨基質-
dc.subject成骨分化-
dc.subject礦化-
dc.subject羥基磷灰石-
dc.subjectCollagen-
dc.subjectanhydride-
dc.subjectcollagen maleate-
dc.subject3D bioprinting-
dc.subjectphotocrosslinking-
dc.subjectprintability-
dc.subjecthydrogel-
dc.subjectgelatin-
dc.subjectgelatin methacrylate-
dc.subjectbone matrix-
dc.subjectosteogenic differentiation-
dc.subjectmineralization-
dc.subjecthydroxyapatite-
dc.title光交聯之酸酐改質膠原蛋白於生物列印並結合骨基質促進硬骨修復之鑑定及應用zh_TW
dc.titleCharacterization and Application of Photocrosslinkable Collagen Maleate as Bioink in Bioprinting and Bone Matrix Composite for Bone Regenerationen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear114-1-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee游佳欣;賴瑞陽;杜育銘;劉澤英;鍾仁傑zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeJiashing Yu;Jui-Yang Lai;Yu-Ming Tu;Tse-Ying Liu;Ren-Jei Chungen
dc.subject.keyword膠原蛋白,馬來酸酐改質膠原蛋白3D生物列印光交聯列印性能水凝膠明膠甲基丙烯酸化明膠骨基質成骨分化礦化羥基磷灰石zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCollagen,anhydridecollagen maleate3D bioprintingphotocrosslinkingprintabilityhydrogelgelatingelatin methacrylatebone matrixosteogenic differentiationmineralizationhydroxyapatiteen
dc.relation.page177-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202504778-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2026-01-15-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept化學工程學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2026-01-28-
顯示於系所單位:化學工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-114-1.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
45.51 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved