Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101310
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃祥宇zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorXiang-Yu Huangen
dc.contributor.author王柏智zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorPo-Chih Wangen
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-14T16:09:48Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-15-
dc.date.copyright2026-01-14-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-12-16-
dc.identifier.citation王瑄 (2021)。強制公告自結盈餘及縮短年度財務報告申報期限之可能影響。月旦會計實務研究,42,46-53。
江易諺 (2019)。以班佛定律探討公司自結盈餘與公告盈餘之關聯,碩士論文,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所。
李建然、廖秀梅與馬心屏 (2022)。影響上市櫃公司於公開資訊觀測站自願申報自結損益的決定因素。臺大管理論叢,32(1),127-152。
岳巧盼 (2023)。自結盈餘公佈時間落差與總審計調整數之關聯,碩士論文,國立成功大學會計學研究所。
林鳳儀與蘇信安 (2011)。自願性資訊揭露與強制性資訊揭露之盈餘管理。管理學報,28(4),345-359。
林嬋娟與黃惠君 (2003)。有助縮小空窗期 差異數字見分明 從公司自結損益實施狀況一探公司良窳。會計研究月刊,(212),118-126。
金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局(金管會證期局) (2023)。提升財務報告資訊揭露政策及相關宣導事項。
范宏書、陳慶隆、李淑華與謝永明 (2008)。總審計調整數對公司財務報表公佈時效性之影響。輔仁管理評論,15(1),73-105。
張森河、黃劭彥、王登仕與康照宗 (2018)。經理人過度自信與審計能力對自結盈餘資訊揭露決策的影響。管理與系統,25(2),145-188。
楊孟萍、林瑞青與盧怡倫 (2004)。自結盈餘與公告盈餘間差異之影響因素研究。臺大管理論叢,14(2),135-160。
戴怡蕙 (2020)。盈餘公告時點與盈餘品質。管理與系統,27(3),319-362。
薛敏正、林嬋娟與林秀鳳 (2008)。董事會特性與財務報告重編。交大管理學報,2,73-103。
Alves, S. (2023). CEO duality, earnings quality and board independence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(2), 217-231.
Amir, E., & Livnat, J. (2005). The economic consequences of (not) issuing preliminary earnings announcement. Working paper, New York University.
Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
Bergstresser, D., & Philippon, T. (2006). CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 511-529.
Bradbury, M., Mak, Y. T., & Tan, S. (2006). Board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and abnormal accruals. Pacific Accounting Review, 18(2), 47-68.
Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99-126.
Burgstahler, D., & Eames, M. (2006). Management of earnings and analysts' forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(5‐6), 633-652.
Carslaw, C. A. P. N., & and Kaplan, S. E. (1991). An Examination of Audit Delay: Further Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research, 22(85), 21-32.
Chung, H., & Kallapur, S. (2003). Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 78(4), 931-955.
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344-401.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36.
DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), 145-176.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295-327.
Francis, J., Nanda, D., & Olsson, P. (2008). Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality, and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 53-99.
Givoly, D., & Palmon, D. (1982). Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, 57(3), 486–508.
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.
Hsieh, Y.-M. & Tsai, Y. (2004). Aggregate audit adjustments and discretionary accruals: Further evidence on the relation between audit quality and earnings management. Available at SSRN, 616221.
Huang, H. H., Wang, W., & Zhou, J. (2013). Shareholder rights, insider ownership and earnings management. Abacus, 49(1), 46-73.
Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.F. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Kinney Jr, W. R., & Martin, R. D. (1994). Does Auditing Reduce Bias in Financial Reporting? A Review of Audit-Related Adjustment Studies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13(1).
Knechel, W. R., & Sharma, D. S. (2012). Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: Evidence from pre-and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85-114.
Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.
Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., & Wysocki, P. D. (2009). Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), 241-276.
Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. J. (2000). Voluntary disclosure and equity offerings: reducing information asymmetry or hyping the stock? Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(4), 623-662.
Michaely, R., Rubin, A., & Vedrashko, A. (2014). Corporate governance and the timing of earnings announcements. Review of Finance, 18(6), 2003-2044.
Miller, G. S. (2002). Earnings performance and discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 173-204.
Robin, A., & Wu, Q. (2015). Firm growth and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 45, 561-590.
Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370.
Salem, R. I. A., Ezeani, E., Gerged, A. M., Usman, M., & Alqatamin, R. M. (2021). Does the quality of voluntary disclosure constrain earnings management in emerging economies? Evidence from Middle Eastern and North African banks. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(1), 91-126.
Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons, 17, 97-110.
Soltani, B. (2002). Timeliness of corporate and audit reports: Some empirical evidence in the French context. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 215-246.
Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 97-180.
Warfield, T. D., Wild, J. J., & Wild, K. L. (1995). Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(1), 61-91.
Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316.
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101310-
dc.description.abstract為提升財務資訊之時效性並縮短資訊空窗期,臺灣主管機關自 2002 年起推動「自結損益資訊申報制度」,並自 2021 年起分階段實施「年度自結財務資訊申報制度」,要求特定條件下之上市櫃公司揭露完整自結財報,並於 2023 年起全面適用。本研究以 2009 年至 2023 年之臺灣上市櫃公司為研究對象,並以自結財務資訊制度為分析基礎,探討在雙重制度架構下,企業之資訊揭露行為與盈餘品質之關聯性,並進一步解析企業於資訊空窗期間之揭露策略,是否反映其會計資訊處理能力與盈餘管理傾向。
實證結果顯示,有申報自結損益資訊之公司,其盈餘品質顯著優於未申報者,特別是在盈餘高估之樣本中效果更為顯著。進一步分群分析亦發現,無申報自結損益資訊但須申報年度自結財務資訊之公司,其盈餘操縱幅度與總審計調整幅度顯著較高,顯示資訊揭露主動性不足或會計資訊處理能力較低之企業,盈餘品質相對較差。
本研究更進一步以 IFRS 穩定施行後之年度作為替代樣本期間進行測試,亦另行排除因公告財務預測而強制申報自結損益資訊之公司樣本,重新檢驗企業資訊揭露行為與盈餘品質之關聯性,結果皆與假說一致,進一步強化結果之穩健性。惟年度自結財務資訊申報制度之實施並未顯著改善資訊揭露與盈餘品質間之關係,顯示制度成效仍待後續觀察與落實。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn response to the growing demand for timely and transparent financial information, Taiwan’s financial supervisory authority introduced the “Self-assessed Earnings Disclosure System” in 2002, followed by the phased implementation of the “Annual Self-reported Financial Information Disclosure System” beginning in 2021, which became fully applicable to all listed firms by 2023. This study investigates the association between voluntary and mandatory financial disclosure behavior and earnings quality, using a sample of Taiwanese listed and OTC-listed companies from 2009 to 2023. Specifically, the analysis examines whether firms’ disclosure practices during the financial reporting gap reflect their accounting information processing capabilities and tendencies toward earnings management.
The empirical findings demonstrate that firms voluntarily disclosing self-assessed earnings exhibit significantly higher earnings quality, as indicated by lower discretionary accruals, particularly in cases of income-increasing earnings management. Further, a disclosure-based classification reveals that firms which do not disclose self-assessed earnings but are required to submit annual self-reported financial statements tend to exhibit greater earnings manipulation and larger aggregate audit adjustments ratio, suggesting that lower disclosure initiative and weaker financial reporting capacity are associated with poorer earnings quality.
Two sets of robustness tests were conducted—one using data from the post-IFRS stabilization period, and the other excluding firms required to disclose self-assessed earnings due to financial forecasts. Both results support the main hypotheses and reinforce the robustness of the findings. Nevertheless, the implementation of the annual self-reported financial information disclosure system has not yet led to a statistically significant enhancement in the relationship between disclosure behavior and earnings quality. This outcome implies that the policy’s effectiveness in enhancing information disclosure and earnings quality remains uncertain and may depend on further institutional development and practical enforcement.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-01-14T16:09:48Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-01-14T16:09:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
摘 要 iii
Abstract iv
目 次 vi
表 次 viii
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究流程與架構 4
第二章、文獻回顧與研究假說 5
第一節、自結損益申報與年度財務資訊申報制度之沿革 5
第二節、自結盈餘與總審計調整數之相關文獻 9
第三節、資訊揭露、公司治理與盈餘品質之關聯性 11
第四節、研究假說建立 15
第三章、研究方法 19
第一節、資料來源與樣本選取 19
第二節、應變數定義 25
第三節、研究模型設計與變數衡量 28
第四章、實證結果與分析 37
第一節、敘述性統計 37
第二節、相關係數分析 45
第三節、多變量迴歸分析 51
第四節、穩健性測試 67
第五節、額外測試 74
第五章、研究結論與建議 78
第一節、研究結論 78
第二節、研究限制 80
第三節、研究貢獻與政策意涵 81
第四節、未來研究方向 82
參考文獻 83
附錄1、模型變數定義表 88
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject自結損益-
dc.subject年度自結財務資訊-
dc.subject盈餘品質-
dc.subject裁決性應計數-
dc.subject總審計調整比例-
dc.subjectSelf-assessed earnings-
dc.subjectAnnual self-reported financial information-
dc.subjectEarnings quality-
dc.subjectDiscretionary accruals-
dc.subjectAggregate audit adjustments ratio-
dc.title自結財務資訊申報與盈餘品質之關聯性zh_TW
dc.titleThe Association Between Unaudited Financial Information Disclosure and Earnings Qualityen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear114-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee廖芝嫻;翁嘉祥zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChih-Hsien Liao;Chia-Hsiang Wengen
dc.subject.keyword自結損益,年度自結財務資訊盈餘品質裁決性應計數總審計調整比例zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSelf-assessed earnings,Annual self-reported financial informationEarnings qualityDiscretionary accrualsAggregate audit adjustments ratioen
dc.relation.page89-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202503627-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2025-12-16-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學系-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-114-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
6.13 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved