請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101290完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林麗瓊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Li-Chyong Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 施緹亞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Septia Kholimatussadiah | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-13T16:14:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-14 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-01-13 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-10-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
1. Bard, A. J., Mirkin, M. V., Unwin, P. R. & Wipf, D. O. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. 12. Theory and Experiment of the Feedback Mode with Finite Heterogeneous Electron-Transfer Kinetics and Arbitrary Substrate Size. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 1861-1868 (1992). 2. Bard, A. J., Fan, F.-R. F. & Mirkin, M. V. Scanning electrochemical microscopy. Electroanal. Chem. 18, 243-373 (1994). 3. Amemiya, S., Bard, A. J., Fan, F. R. F., Mirkin, M. V. & Unwin, P. R. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1, 95-131 (2008). 4. Dery, S., Friedman, B., Shema, H. & Gross, E. Mechanistic Insights Gained by High Spatial Resolution Reactivity Mapping of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous (Electro)Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 123, 6003-6038 (2023). 5. Limani, N., Boudet, A., Blanchard, N., Jousselme, B. & Cornut, R. Local probe investigation of electrocatalytic activity. Chem. Sci. 12, 71-98 (2021). 6. Macpherson, J. V. & Unwin, P. R. Combined scanning electrochemical-atomic force microscopy. Anal. Chem. 72, 276-285 (2000). 7. Macpherson, J. V. & Unwin, P. R. Noncontact electrochemical imaging with combined scanning electrochemical atomic force microscopy. Anal. Chem. 73, 550-557 (2001). 8. Kueng, A., Kranz, C., Mizaikoff, B., Lugstein, A. & Bertagnolli, E. Combined scanning electrochemical atomic force microscopy for tapping mode imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1592-1594 (2003). 9. Kueng, A., Kranz, C., Lugstein, A., Bertagnolli, E. & Mizaikoff, B. Integrated AFM-SECM in tapping mode: Simultaneous topographical and electrochemical imaging of enzyme activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 42, 3238-3240 (2003). 10. Nellist, M. R. et al. Atomic force microscopy with nanoelectrode tips for high resolution electrochemical, nanoadhesion and nanoelectrical imaging. Nanotechnol. 28, 095711 (2017). 11. Shi, X. N., Qing, W. H., Marhaba, T. & Zhang, W. Atomic force microscopy - Scanning electrochemical microscopy (AFM-SECM) for nanoscale topographical and electrochemical characterization: Principles, applications and perspectives. Electrochim. Acta 332 (2020). 12. Ebejer, N., Schnippering, M., Colburn, A. W., Edwards, M. A. & Unwin, P. R. Localized High Resolution Electrochemistry and Multifunctional Imaging: Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 82, 9141-9145 (2010). 13. Ebejer, N. et al. Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy: A Versatile Technique for Nanoscale Electrochemistry and Functional Imaging. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 6, 329-351 (2013). 14. Wahab, O. J., Kang, M. & Unwin, P. R. Scanning electrochemical cell microscopy: A natural technique for single entity electrochemistry. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 22, 120-128 (2020). 15. Zoski, C. G. Handbook of electrochemistry. (Elsevier, 2006). 16. Polcari, D., Dauphin-Ducharme, P. & Mauzeroll, J. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy: A Comprehensive Review of Experimental Parameters from 1989 to 2015. Chem. Rev. 116, 13234-13278 (2016). 17. Bertoncello, P. Advances on scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) for energy. Energ. Environ. Sci. 3, 1620-1633 (2010). 18. Bentley, C. L. et al. Nanoscale Electrochemical Mapping. Anal. Chem. 91, 84-108 (2019). 19. Wittstock, G., Burchardt, M., Pust, S. E., Shen, Y. & Zhao, C. Scanning electrochemical microscopy for direct imaging of reaction rates. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 46, 1584-1617 (2007). 20. Danis, L., Gateman, S. M., Kuss, C., Schougaard, S. B. & Mauzeroll, J. Nanoscale Measurements of Lithium-Ion-Battery Materials using Scanning Probe Techniques. Chemelectrochem. 4, 6-19 (2017). 21. Huang, S. H., Parandhaman, M., Farnia, S., Kim, J. & Amemiya, S. Nanoelectrochemistry at liquid/liquid interfaces for analytical, biological, and material applications. Chem. Commun. 59, 9575-9590 (2023). 22. Edgecomb, J. et al. Electrochemical Imaging of Precisely-Defined Redox and Reactive Interfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 63 (2024). 23. Raju, A. R., Schougaard, S. B. & Mauzeroll, J. Current trends in SECM for energy storage devices: Reaching the microstructure level to tune devices and performance. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 45 (2024). 24. Barroso-Martínez, J. S. & Escudero-Escribano, M. In Situ Elucidation of Reaction Mechanisms in Electrocatalysis Using Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Chemcatchem. 17 (2025). 25. Zhang, B. Y. et al. Investigation of Regeneration Kinetics in Quantum-Dots-Sensitized Solar Cells with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6, 20913-20918 (2014). 26. Kylberg, W., Wain, A. J. & Castro, F. A. Screening of Photoactive Dyes on TiO2 Surfaces Using Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 17384-17392 (2012). 27. Martin, C. J. et al. Development of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) techniques for the optimization of dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 119, 86-91 (2014). 28. Tefashe, U. M., Loewenstein, T., Miura, H., Schlettwein, D. & Wittstock, G. Scanning electrochemical microscope studies of dye regeneration in indoline (D149)-sensitized ZnO photoelectrochemical cells. J. Electroanal. Chem. 650, 24-30 (2010). 29. Schmidt, I. et al. Spatially Resolved Analysis of Screen Printed Photoanodes of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Electrochim. Acta 222, 735-746 (2016). 30. Bülter, H., Peters, F., Schwenzel, J. & Wittstock, G. Spatiotemporal Changes of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase in Lithium-Ion Batteries Detected by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 53, 10531-10535 (2014). 31. Watkins, T. S. et al. A combined SECM and electrochemical AFM approach to probe interfacial processes affecting molecular reactivity at redox flow battery electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 15734-15745 (2020). 32. Mahankali, K., Thangavel, N. K. & Arava, L. M. R. In Situ Electrochemical Mapping of Lithium-Sulfur Battery Interfaces Using AFM-SECM. Nano Lett. 19, 5229-5236 (2019). 33. Tao, B. L., Yule, L. C., Daviddi, E., Bentley, C. L. & Unwin, P. R. Correlative Electrochemical Microscopy of Li-Ion (De)intercalation at a Series of Individual LiMn2O4 Particles. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 58, 4606-4611 (2019). 34. Santos, C. S., Botz, A., Bandarenka, A. S., Ventosa, E. & Schuhmann, W. Correlative Electrochemical Microscopy for the Elucidation of the Local Ionic and Electronic Properties of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase in Li-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 61 (2022). 35. Lang, S. Y. & Wen, R. Understanding the solid electrolyte interphases in battery systems by electrochemical atomic force microscopy and its derivatives. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 46 (2024). 36. Daboss, S. et al. Characterization of the solid/electrolyte interphase at hard carbon anodes via scanning (electrochemical) probe microscopy. Electrochim. Acta 453 (2023). 37. Cannan, S. et al. Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) studies of catalytic EC' processes: theory and experiment for feedback, generation/collection and imaging measurements. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 5403-5412 (2011). 38. Martin, R. D. & Unwin, P. R. Theory and experiment for the substrate generation tip collection mode of the scanning electrochemical microscope: Application as an approach for measuring the diffusion coefficient ratio of a redox couple. Anal. Chem. 70, 276-284 (1998). 39. Eckhard, K. & Schuhmann, W. Localised visualisation of O2 consumption and H2O2 formation by means of SECM for the characterisation of fuel cell catalyst activity. Electrochim. Acta 53, 1164-1169 (2007). 40. Leonard, K. C. & Bard, A. J. The Study of Multireactional Electrochemical Interfaces via a Tip Generation/Substrate Collection Mode of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy: The Hydrogen Evolution Reaction for Mn in Acidic Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15890-15896 (2013). 41. Wang, Y. L. & Wipf, D. O. Visualizing Hydrogen Oxidation Reaction Activity of Polycrystalline Platinum by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167 (2020). 42. Zoski, C. G. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: Investigation of hydrogen oxidation at polycrystalline noble metal electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 6401-6405 (2003). 43. Ma, W. et al. Electrochemical Size Measurement and Characterization of Electrodeposited Platinum Nanoparticles at Manometer Resolution with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Nano Lett. 17, 4354-4358 (2017). 44. Nie, W. et al. Visualizing the Spatial Heterogeneity of Electron Transfer on a Metallic Nanoplate Prism. Nano Lett. 21, 8901-8909 (2021). 45. Salek, S. & Byers, J. C. Influence of Particle Size on Mass Transport during the Oxygen Reduction Reaction at Single Silver Particles Using Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 8494-8500 (2024). 46. Wang, Q. L. et al. Boosting Interfacial Electron Transfer and CO2 Enrichment on ZIF-8/ZnTe for Selective Photoelectrochemical Reduction of CO2 to CO. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 16, 36462-36470 (2024). 47. Guo, S. X. et al. Advanced Spatiotemporal Voltammetric Techniques for Kinetic Analysis and Active Site Determination in the Electrochemical Reduction of CO. Accounts Chem. Res. 55, 241-251 (2022). 48. Wahab, O. J., Kang, M., Daviddi, E., Walker, M. & Unwin, P. R. Screening Surface Structure-Electrochemical Activity Relationships of Copper Electrodes under CO(2) Electroreduction Conditions. ACS Catal. 12, 6578-6588 (2022). 49. Schott, C. M. et al. Revealing Catalytic Properties of Palladium/Gold Systems toward Hydrogen Evolution, Oxidation, and Absorption with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. ACS Catal. 15, 9035-9046 (2025). 50. Yao, Y. F. et al. Identifying In Situ Activity and Selectivity of Oxygen Reduction Catalysts at the Subparticle Level. ACS Nano 19, 18502-18512 (2025). 51. Liberman, I., Ifraemov, R., Shimoni, R. & Hod, I. Localized Electrosynthesis and Subsequent Electrochemical Mapping of Catalytically Active Metal-Organic Frameworks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022). 52. Sánchez-Sánchez, C. M. & Bard, A. J. Hydrogen Peroxide Production in the Oxygen Reduction Reaction at Different Electrocatalysts as Quantified by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 81, 8094-8100 (2009). 53. Kai, T. H., Zhou, M., Duan, Z. Y., Henkelman, G. A. & Bard, A. J. Detection of CO2•− in the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide in N,N‑Dimethylformamide by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 18552-18557 (2017). 54. Zhao, Y. et al. Identification of Dynamic Active Sites in the Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 31722-31730 (2025). 55. Ritzert, N. L., Szalai, V. A. & Moffat, T. P. Mapping Electron Transfer at MoS2 Using Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Langmuir 34, 13864-13870 (2018). 56. Eidenschink, J. & Matysik, F. M. Development of an in situ Mediator Dosing Concept for Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy in Lithium-Ion Battery Research. Chemelectrochem. 11 (2024). 57. Trinh, D., Keddam, M., Novoa, X. R. & Vivier, V. Alternating-Current Measurements in Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy, Part 1: Principle and Theory. Chemphyschem. 12, 2169-2176 (2011). 58. Wang, Y. X., Kececi, K., Velmurugan, J. & Mirkin, M. V. Electron transfer/ion transfer mode of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM): a new tool for imaging and kinetic studies. Chem. Sci. 4, 3606-3616 (2013). 59. Nam, Y., Cho, S. E. & Ahn, H. S. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Reveals Facet-Dependent Structure-Selectivity Relationship for CO2 Reduction on Gold Surfaces. ACS Catal. 14, 17084-17089 (2024). 60. Pal, A., Shankar, A. R. & Krishna, N. G. Corrosion mapping of intermetallic in a dissimilar weldment using in-situ alternating current scanning electrochemical microscopy. Mater. Today Commun. 41 (2024). 61. Mishra, A., Zorigt, M., Kim, D. O. & Rodríguez-López, J. Voltammetric Detection of Singlet Oxygen Enabled by Nanogap Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 8847-8851 (2024). 62. Hernández-Concepcíon, B., Souto, R. M. & Izquierdo, J. Novel dynamic method based on CV-SECM and SWV-SECM for the in situ chemical imaging of reactive metal surfaces undergoing corrosion and corrosion inhibition illustrated with the case of copper corrosion inhibition by benzotriazole. Electrochim. Acta 474 (2024). 63. Sun, T., Wang, D. C. & Mirkin, M. V. Tunneling Mode of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy: Probing Electrochemical Processes at Single Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 57, 7463-7467 (2018). 64. Ma, Y. F., Zhao, Y. J., Liu, R. J. & Wang, D. C. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Featuring Transient Current Signals in Carbon Nanopipets with Dilute or No Redox Mediator. Anal. Chem. 94, 11124-11128 (2022). 65. Barman, K., Wang, X., Jia, R. & Mirkin, M. V. Mediated Charge Transfer at Nanoelectrodes: A New Approach to Electrochemical Reactivity Mapping and Nanosensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 8547-8551 (2021). 66. Skaanvik, S. A., Stephens, L. I., Gateman, S. M., Geissler, M. & Mauzeroll, J. Quantitative Feedback Referencing for Improved Kinetic Fitting of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Measurements. Anal. Chem. 94, 13852-13859 (2022). 67. Lefrou, C. & Cornut, R. Analytical Expressions for Quantitative Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (SECM). Chemphyschem. 11, 547-556 (2010). 68. Cornut, R. & Lefrou, C. New analytical approximation of feedback approach curves with a microdisk SECM tip and irreversible kinetic reaction at the substrate. J. Electroanal. Chem. 621, 178-184 (2008). 69. Tan, S. Y., Perry, D. & Unwin, P. R. Double layer effects in voltammetric measurements with scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). J. Electroanal. Chem. 819, 240-250 (2018). 70. Bae, J. H., Yu, Y. & Mirkin, M. V. Diffuse Layer Effect on Electron-Transfer Kinetics Measured by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (SECM). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 1338-1342 (2017). 71. Howard, J. et al. A comparative computational and scanning electrochemical microscopy study of factors influencing electron transfer at the hydrogenated and pristine graphite - propylene carbonate electrochemical interface. J. Mater. Chem. A 13, 10097-10110 (2025). 72. Leslie, N., Mena-Morcillo, E., Morel, A. & Mauzeroll, J. Fitting Kinetics from Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Images of Finite Circular Features. Anal. Chem. 94, 15315-15323 (2022). 73. Ryu, C. H., Mandal, D. & Ren, H. Gas-Liquid-Solid Three-Phase Boundary in Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy. ACS Meas. Sci. Au 4, 729-736 (2024). 74. Mirabal, A. & Barton, S. C. Numerical Correction of In Situ AFM-SECM Measurements. Anal. Chem. 93, 12495-12503 (2021). 75. Askarova, G., Barman, K. & Mirkin, M. V. Quantitative Measurements of Electrocatalytic Reaction Rates with NanoSECM. Anal. Chem. 96, 6089-6095 (2024). 76. Blount, B., Juarez, G., Wang, Y. F. & Ren, H. iR drop in scanning electrochemical cell microscopy. Faraday Discuss. 233, 149-162 (2022). 77. Hill, C. M., Kim, J. & Bard, A. J. Electrochemistry at a Metal Nanoparticle on a Tunneling Film: A Steady-State Model of Current Densities at a Tunneling Ultramicroelectrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11321-11326 (2015). 78. Hill, C. M., Kim, J., Bodappa, N. & Bard, A. J. Electrochemical Nonadiabatic Electron Transfer via Tunneling to Solution Species through Thin Insulating Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6114-6119 (2017). 79. Liu, D. Q. et al. Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials. Nat. Commun. 12, 7110 (2021). 80. Park, H. S., Leonard, K. C. & Bard, A. J. Surface Interrogation Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (SI-SECM) of Photoelectrochemistry at a W/Mo-BiVO4 Semiconductor Electrode: Quantification of Hydroxyl Radicals during Water Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 12093-12102 (2013). 81. Li, F. & Unwin, P. R. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (SECM) of Photoinduced Electron Transfer Kinetics at Liquid/Liquid Interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C. 119, 4031-4043 (2015). 82. Moghaddam, M. et al. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Meets Optical Microscopy: Probing the Local Paths of Charge Transfer Operando in Booster-Microparticles for Flow Batteries. Small 20 (2024). 83. Askarova, G., Hesari, M., Wang, C. & Mirkin, M. Decoupling Through-Tip Illumination from Scanning in Nanoscale Photo-SECM. Anal. Chem. 94, 7169-7173 (2022). 84. Askarova, G. et al. Photo-scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Observation of Overall Water Splitting at a Single Aluminum-Doped Strontium Titanium Oxide Microcrystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 6526-6534 (2023). 85. Kumar, S. & Satpati, A. K. Investigation of interfacial charge transfer kinetics of photocharged Co-Bi modified BiVO4 using scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). Electrochim. Acta 368 (2021). 86. Li, X. & Pan, S. L. Transparent Ultramicroelectrodes for Studying Interfacial Charge-Transfer Kinetics of Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation at TiO2 Nanorods with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 93, 15886-15896 (2021). 87. Zhang, B. Y., Zhang, X. F., Xiao, X. & Shen, Y. Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting System—A Study of Interfacial Charge Transfer with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 8, 1606-1614 (2016). 88. Hatfield, K. O., Gole, M. T., Schorr, N. B., Murphy, C. J. & Rodríguez-López, J. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy-Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy: Observation of Real-Time Surface pH Perturbations. Anal. Chem. 93, 7792-7796 (2021). 89. Krukiewicz, K. Coupling scanning probe microscopy with nanofluidics for the electrochemical investigation of microorganisms at the nanoscale. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 51 (2025). 90. Groysman, S. et al. Sensitive Imaging of Electroactive Species in Plasmonic Electrochemical Microscopy Enabled by Nanoconfinement. ACS Electrochem. 1, 974-986 (2025). 91. Dabbous, A., Maillot, B., Audibert, J. F., Brasiliense, V. & Miomandre, F. Plasmon-Induced Simultaneous Electrochemical and Fluorescence Switches Probed by Combined SECM and Fluorescence Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 128, 19829-19838 (2024). 92. Wenzel, S. F., García-Carrillo, R. & Ren, H. Electrochemical correlative microscopy: Discovering insights into structure-reactivity relationships for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 50 (2025). 93. Mena-Morcillo, E., van der Zalm, J. & Chen, A. C. Spatially Resolved Optical Spectroscopic Measurements with Simultaneous Photoelectrochemical Mapping Using Scanning Electrochemical Probe Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 4600-4606 (2023). 94. Guerret-Legras, L. et al. Time-Resolved Fluorescence Microscopy Combined with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy: A New Way to Visualize Photo-Induced Electron Transfer Quenching with an Electrofluorochromic Probe. J. Phys. Chem. C. 124, 23938-23948 (2020). 95. Ma, Y. F. & Wang, D. C. Revealing Electrical Double-Layer Potential of Substrates by Hysteresis Ion Transport in Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 93, 15821-15825 (2021). 96. Sarkar, S., Wang, X., Hesari, M., Chen, P. & Mirkin, M. Scanning Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Microscopy on Finder Grids: Toward Correlative Multitechnique Imaging of Surfaces. Anal. Chem. 93, 5377-5382 (2021). 97. Cheng, L. et al. Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy Platform with Local Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 93, 16401-16408 (2021). 98. Wang, A. C., Jin, R. & Jiang, D. C. Integrated scanning electrochemical cell microscopy platform with local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy using a preamplifier. Faraday Discuss. 257, 182-193 (2025). 99. Henrotte, O. et al. Spatially resolved photocatalytic active sites and quantum efficiency in a 2D semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 16 (2025). 100. Collins, L. et al. Probing charge screening dynamics and electrochemical processes at the solid-liquid interface with electrochemical force microscopy. Nat. Commun. 5 (2014). 101. Samadi, M. et al. Group 6 transition metal dichalcogenide nanomaterials: synthesis, applications and future perspectives. Nanoscale Horiz. 3, 90-204 (2018). 102. Qorbani, M., Chen, K. H. & Chen, L. C. Hybrid and asymmetric supercapacitors: achieving balanced stored charge across electrode materials. Small 20, 2400558 (2024). 103. An, J. R. et al. Perspectives of 2D materials for optoelectronic integration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022). 104. Liu, A. H. et al. The roadmap of 2D materials and devices toward chips. Nano-Micro Lett. 16 (2024). 105. Zhao, Y. et al. Interlayer breathing and shear modes in few-trilayer MoS2 and WSe2. Nano Lett. 13, 1007-1015 (2013). 106. Siao, M. D. et al. Two-dimensional electronic transport and surface electron accumulation in MoS. Nat. Commun. 9 (2018). 107. Chaves, A. et al. Bandgap engineering of two-dimensional semiconductor materials. Npj 2D Mater. Appl. 4 (2020). 108. Yeh, P. C. et al. Layer-dependent electronic structure of an atomically heavy two-dimensional dichalcogenide. Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015). 109. Kim, H. G. & Choi, H. J. Thickness dependence of work function, ionization energy, and electron affinity of Mo and W dichalcogenides from DFT and GW calculations. Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021). 110. Kumar, D., Kumar, V., Kumar, R., Kumar, M. & Kumar, P. Electron-phonon coupling, thermal expansion coefficient, resonance effect, and phonon dynamics in high-quality CVD-grown monolayer and bilayer MoSe. Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022). 111. Jin, W. C. et al. Direct Measurement of the Thickness-Dependent Electronic Band Structure of MoS2 Using Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013). 112. Ahn, G. H. et al. Strain-engineered growth of two-dimensional materials. Nat. Commun. 8 (2017). 113. Tripathi, M. et al. Structural Defects Modulate Electronic and Nanomechanical Properties of 2D Materials. ACS Nano 15, 2520-2531 (2021). 114. Zhang, C. D. et al. Strain distributions and their influence on electronic structures of WSe2-MoS2 laterally strained heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 152 (2018). 115. Li, H. et al. Activating and optimizing MoS2 basal planes for hydrogen evolution through the formation of strained sulphur vacancies. Nat. Mater. 15, 48-54 (2016). 116. Chia, X. Y. & Pumera, M. Characteristics and performance of two-dimensional materials for electrocatalysis. Nat. Catal. 1, 909-921 (2018). 117. Desai, S. B. et al. Strain-induced indirect to direct bandgap transition in multilayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 14, 4592-4597 (2014). 118. Wang, Y. M. et al. Bulk and edge properties of twisted double bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 18, 48 (2022). 119. Chhowalla, M. et al. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 5, 263-275 (2013). 120. Marcellina, E. et al. Evidence for Moire Trions in Twisted MoSe2 Homobilayers. Nano Lett. 21, 4461-4468 (2021). 121. Chiodini, S. et al. Moire Modulation of Van Der Waals Potential in Twisted Hexagonal Boron Nitride. ACS Nano 16, 7589-7604 (2022). 122. Zhang, Y., Felser, C. & Fu, L. Moiré metal for catalysis. Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024). 123. Li, H. et al. Kinetic study of hydrogen evolution reaction over strained MoS2 with sulfur vacancies using scanning electrochemical microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5123-5129 (2016). 124. Sun, T. et al. Nanoscale mapping of hydrogen evolution on metallic and semiconducting MoS2 nanosheets. Nanoscale Horiz. 4, 619-624 (2019). 125. Hill, J. W. & Hill, C. M. Directly Mapping Photoelectrochemical Behavior within Individual Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanosheets. Nano Lett. 19, 5710-5716 (2019). 126. Yu, Y. et al. Tunable angle-dependent electrochemistry at twisted bilayer graphene with moire flat bands. Nat. Chem. 14, 267-273 (2022). 127. Djire, A. et al. Basal plane hydrogen evolution activity from mixed metal nitride MXenes measured by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2001136 (2020). 128. Zhong, J. H. et al. Quantitative Correlation between Defect Density and Heterogeneous Electron Transfer Rate of Single Layer Graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16609-16617 (2014). 129. Zhang, J. et al. Heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics of defective graphene investigated by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 491, 553-559 (2019). 130. Schumacher, S. et al. Revealing the Heterogeneity of Large-Area MoS2 Layers in the Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Chemelectrochem. 9 (2022). 131. Kislenko, V. A., Pavlov, S. V. & Kislenko, S. A. Influence of defects in graphene on electron transfer kinetics: The role of the surface electronic structure. Electrochim. Acta 341 (2020). 132. Kumatani, A. et al. Comprehensive electrochemical imaging analyses of redox activities correlated to multilayer graphene and graphite structures. Electrochim. Acta 499 (2024). 133. Takahashi, Y. et al. High-resolution electrochemical mapping of the hydrogen evolution reaction on transition-metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 59, 3601-3608 (2020). 134. Yakimova, R. et al. Analysis of the Formation Conditions for Large Area Epitaxial Graphene on SiC Substrates. Mater. Sci. Forum, pp. 565-568 (2010). 135. Qorbani, M. et al. Atomistic insights into highly active reconstructed edges of monolayer 2H-WSe2 photocatalyst. Nat. Commun. 13, 1256 (2022). 136. Norskov, J. K. et al. Trends in the exchange current for hydrogen evolution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, J23-J26 (2005). 137. Angulo, A., van der Linde, P., Gardeniers, H., Modestino, M. & Fernández Rivas, D. Influence of Bubbles on the Energy Conversion Efficiency of Electrochemical Reactors. Joule 4, 555-579 (2020). 138. Ando, K., Uchimoto, Y. & Nakajima, T. Concentration profile of dissolved gas during hydrogen gas evolution: an optical approach. Chem. Commun. 56, 14483-14486 (2020). 139. van der Linde, P. et al. Gas bubble evolution on microstructured silicon substrates. Energ. Environ. Sci. 11, 3452-3462 (2018). 140. Battistel, A., Dennison, C. R., Lesch, A. & Girault, H. H. Local Study on Hydrogen and Hydrogen Gas Bubble Formation on a Platinum Electrode. J. Phys. Chem. C. 123, 10849-10856 (2019). 141. Georgescu, N. S., Robinson, D. A. & White, H. S. Effect of Nonuniform Mass Transport on Nanobubble Nucleation at Individual Pt Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 125, 19724-19732 (2021). 142. Iwata, R. et al. Bubble growth and departure modes on wettable/non-wettable porous foams in alkaline water splitting. Joule 5, 887-900 (2021). 143. Hao, R., Fan, Y., Howard, M. D., Vaughan, J. C. & Zhang, B. Imaging nanobubble nucleation and hydrogen spillover during electrocatalytic water splitting. Proceed. of the Nat. Acad. of Sci. 115, 5878-5883 (2018). 144. Fernández, D., Maurer, P., Martine, M., Coey, J. M. D. & Möbius, M. E. Bubble Formation at a Gas-Evolving Microelectrode. Langmuir 30, 13065-13074 (2014). 145. Schönherr, H., Hain, N., Walczyk, W., Wesner, D. & Druzhinin, S. I. Surface nanobubbles studied by atomic force microscopy techniques: Facts, fiction, and open questions. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 55, 08NA01 (2016). 146. Fang, C.-K., Ko, H.-C., Yang, C.-W., Lu, Y.-H. & Hwang, I.-S. Nucleation processes of nanobubbles at a solid/water interface. Sci. Rep. 6, 24651 (2016). 147. Liu, Y., Lu, X., Peng, Y. & Chen, Q. Electrochemical Visualization of Gas Bubbles on Superaerophobic Electrodes Using Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 93, 12337-12345 (2021). 148. Liu, Y. L. et al. Visualization and Quantification of Electrochemical H2 Bubble Nucleation at Pt, Au, and MoS2 Substrates. ACS Sensors 6, 355-363 (2021). 149. Tzalenchuk, A. et al. Towards a quantum resistance standard based on epitaxial graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 186-189 (2010). 150. Yazdi, G. R., Iakimov, T. & Yakimova, R. Epitaxial Graphene on SiC: A Review of Growth and Characterization. Crystals 6 (2016). 151. Patel, A. N. et al. A New View of Electrochemistry at Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 20117-20130 (2012). 152. Huang, H. et al. Graphene Nanoarchitectonics: Recent Advances in Graphene-Based Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 31, 1903415 (2019). 153. Wehrhold, M. et al. A highly durable graphene monolayer electrode under long-term hydrogen evolution cycling. Chem. Commun. 58, 3823-3826 (2022). 154. Ye, G. et al. Defects Engineered Monolayer MoS2 for Improved Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nano Lett. 16, 1097-1103 (2016). 155. Du, H. Y. et al. Nanoscale redox mapping at the MoS2-liquid interface. Nat. Commun. 12, 1321 (2021). 156. Güell, A. G. et al. Redox-Dependent Spatially Resolved Electrochemistry at Graphene and Graphite Step Edges. ACS Nano 9, 3558-3571 (2015). 157. Zhang, X. Y., Xin, J. & Ding, F. The edges of graphene. Nanoscale 5, 2556-2569 (2013). 158. Phani, A., Jung, H. S. & Kim, S. Deconvolution of dissipative pathways for the interpretation of tapping-mode atomic force microscopy from phase-contrast. Communications Physics 4 (2021). 159. Deng, Z., Smolyanitsky, A., Li, Q. Y., Feng, X. Q. & Cannara, R. J. Adhesion-dependent negative friction coefficient on chemically modified graphite at the nanoscale. Nat. Mater. 11, 1032-1037 (2012). 160. Ma, Q. Q., Young, J., Gao, J. N., Tao, Y. & Zhang, W. Nanoscale Hydrophobicity and Electrochemical Mapping Provides Insights into Facet Dependent Silver Nanoparticle Dissolution. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 2665-2673 (2023). 161. Xie, L. et al. Mapping the Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Surface Hydrophobicity on the Sphalerite Mineral. J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 5620-5628 (2017). 162. Munz, M., Giusca, C. E., Myers-Ward, R. L., Gaskill, D. K. & Kazakova, O. Thickness-Dependent Hydrophobicity of Epitaxial Graphene. ACS Nano 9, 8401-8411 (2015). 163. Banerjee, S., Sardar, M., Gayathri, N., Tyagi, A. K. & Raj, B. Conductivity landscape of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite surfaces containing ribbons and edges. Phys. Rev. B 72, 075418 (2005). 164. Deng, S. K. & Berry, V. Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mechanism, electronic properties, and applications. Mater. Today 19, 197-212 (2016). 165. Zhu, W. J. et al. Structure and Electronic Transport in Graphene Wrinkles. Nano Lett. 12, 3431-3436 (2012). 166. Lai, S. C. S., Patel, A. N., McKelvey, K. & Unwin, P. R. Definitive Evidence for Fast Electron Transfer at Pristine Basal Plane Graphite from High-Resolution Electrochemical Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 51, 5405-5408 (2012). 167. Velicky, M. & Toth, P. S. From two-dimensional materials to their heterostructures: an electrochemist's perspective. Appl. Mater. Today 8, 68-103 (2017). 168. Bentley, C. L., Kang, M. & Unwin, P. R. Nanoscale structure dynamics within electrocatalytic materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 16813-16821 (2017). 169. Wurstbauer, U., Miller, B., Parzinger, E. & Holleitner, A. W. Light-matter interaction in transition metal dichalcogenides and their heterostructures. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 50, 173001 (2017). 170. Lee, H. et al. Layer-dependent interfacial transport and optoelectrical properties of MoS2 on ultraflat metals. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 11, 31543-31550 (2019). 171. Yang, R. J. et al. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides for photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 135, e202218016 (2023). 172. Deng, D. H. et al. Catalysis with two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 218-230 (2016). 173. Wu, J. J. et al. Exfoliated 2D transition metal disulfides for enhanced electrocatalysis of oxygen evolution reaction in acidic medium. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1500669 (2016). 174. Zhao, Y., Huang, J. Z., Chen, J. Q., Liu, Y. W. & Zhai, T. Y. Chemical-vapor-deposition-grown 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: a generalist model for engineering electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nano Res. 16, 101-116 (2022). 175. Liu, X. et al. Activating the electrocatalysis of MoS2 basal plane for hydrogen evolution via atomic defect configurations. Small 18, 2200601 (2022). 176. Voiry, D. et al. The role of electronic coupling between substrate and 2D MoS2 nanosheets in electrocatalytic production of hydrogen. Nat. Mater. 15, 1003-1009 (2016). 177. Raman, R. et al. Selective activation of MoS2 grain boundaries for enhanced electrochemical activity. Nanoscale Horiz. 9, 946-955 (2024). 178. Yu, Y. F. et al. Layer-dependent electrocatalysis of MoS2 for hydrogen evolution. Nano Lett. 14, 553-558 (2014). 179. Singh, V., Morel, A., Gallant, D. & Mauzeroll, J. From microscale to road scale: Bridging the gaps of predictive aluminum corrosion using SECM. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 12, 2400669 (2025). 180. Hui, J. S. et al. Kinetic modulation of outer-sphere electron transfer reactions on graphene electrode with a sub-surface metal substrate. Electrochim. Acta 211, 1016-1023 (2016). 181. Güell, A. G. et al. Redox-dependent spatially resolved electrochemistry at graphene and graphite step edges. ACS Nano 9, 3558-3571 (2015). 182. Bentley, C. L. et al. Electrochemical maps and movies of the hydrogen evolution reaction on natural crystals of molybdenite (MoS2): basal vs. edge plane activity. Chem. Sci. 8, 6583-6593 (2017). 183. Zhao, X. et al. Plasmonic imaging of the layer-dependent electrocatalytic activity of two-dimensional catalysts. Nat. Commun. 13, 7869 (2022). 184. Yang, L. et al. Lattice strain effects on the optical properties of MoS2 nanosheets. Sci. Rep. 4, 5649 (2014). 185. Terrones, H. et al. New first order Raman-active modes in few layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Sci. Rep. 4, 4215 (2014). 186. Bevan, K. H., Foong, Y. W., Shirani, J., Yuan, S. S. & Farraj, S. A. Physics applied to electrochemistry: tunneling reactions. J. Appl. Phys. 129, 090901 (2021). 187. Memming, R. Semiconductor Electrochemistry (Second Edition). (Wiley-VCH VerlagGmbH & Co.KGaA, 2015). 188. Gao, Y. Q., Georgievskii, Y. & Marcus, R. A. On the theory of electron transfer reactions at semiconductor electrode/liquid interfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3358-3369 (2000). 189. Gosavi, S. & Marcus, R. A. Nonadiabatic electron-transfer at metal surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 2067-2072 (2000). 190. Güell, A. G., Ebejer, N., Snowden, M. E., Macpherson, J. V. & Unwin, P. R. Structural correlations in heterogeneous electron transfer at monolayer and multilayer graphene electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7258-7261 (2012). 191. Velicky, M. et al. Electron transfer kinetics on mono- and multilayer graphene. ACS Nano 8, 10089-10100 (2014). 192. Li, X. L. et al. Layer-number dependent optical properties of 2D materials and their application for thickness determination. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1604468 (2017). 193. Zhou, H. L. et al. Large area growth and electrical properties of p-type WSe2 atomic layers. Nano Lett. 15, 709-713 (2015). 194. Laturia, A., Van de Put, M. L. & Vandenberghe, W. G. Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk. Npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2, 6 (2018). 195. Sangwan, V. K. & Hersam, M. C. Electronic transport in two-dimensional materials. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 69, 299-325 (2018). 196. Das, S., Chen, H. Y., Penumatcha, A. V. & Appenzeller, J. High performance multilayer MoS2 transistors with scandium contacts. Nano Lett. 13, 100-105 (2013). 197. Lin, M. W. et al. Thickness-dependent charge transport in few-layer MoS2 field-effect transistors. Nanotechnol. 27, 165203 (2016). 198. Lee, W. Y. et al. Layer dependence of out-of-plane electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient in continuous mono- to multilayer MoS2 films. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 26896-26903 (2021). 199. Zheng, J. Y. et al. High-mobility multilayered MoS2 flakes with low contact resistance grown by chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604540 (2017). 200. Cabré, M. B., Paiva, A. E., Velicky, M., Colavita, P. E. & McKelvey, K. Electrochemical kinetics as a function of transition metal dichalcogenide thickness. Electrochim. Acta 393, 139027 (2021). 201. Britnell, L. et al. Electron tunneling through ultrathin boron nitride crystalline barriers. Nano Lett. 12, 1707-1710 (2012). 202. Son, Y. et al. Layer number dependence of MoS2 photoconductivity using photocurrent spectral atomic force microscopic imaging. ACS Nano 9, 2843-2855 (2015). 203. Patten, H. V. et al. Electrochemical mapping reveals direct correlation between heterogeneous electron-transfer kinetics and local density of states in diamond electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 51, 7002-7006 (2012). 204. Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science 355, 146 (2017). 205. Faber, M. S. & Jin, S. Earth-abundant inorganic electrocatalysts and their nanostructures for energy conversion applications. Energ. Environ. Sci. 7, 3519-3542 (2014). 206. Noh, S. H. et al. Tuning the catalytic activity of heterogeneous two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides for hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 20005-20014 (2018). 207. Tsai, C., Chan, K. R., Abild-Pedersen, F. & Norskov, J. K. Active edge sites in MoSe2 and WSe2 catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction: a density functional study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 13156-13164 (2014). 208. Kholimatussadiah, S. et al. In-situ observation of hydrogen nanobubbles formation on graphene surface by AFM-SECM. Electrochim. Acta 493, 144425 (2024). 209. Muthu, J. et al. The HER performance of 2D materials is underestimated without morphology correction. Chem. Eng. J. 465, 142852 (2023). 210. Muthu, J., Khurshid, F., Hofmann, M. & Hsieh, Y. P. Review of extrinsic factors that limit the catalytic performance of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) in hydrogen evolution reactions (HER). Chemelectrochem. 11, e202400259 (2024). 211. Bozheyev, F. & Ellmer, K. Thin film transition metal dichalcogenide photoelectrodes for solar hydrogen evolution: a review. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 9327-9347 (2022). 212. Li, H. Y., Jia, X. F., Zhang, Q. & Wang, X. Metallic transition-metal dichalcogenide nanocatalysts for energy conversion. Chem 4, 1510-1537 (2018). 213. Han, G. H., Duong, D. L., Keum, D. H., Yun, S. J. & Lee, Y. H. van der Waals metallic transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Rev. 118, 6297-6336 (2018). 214. Najafi, L. et al. Niobium disulphide (NbS2)-based (heterogeneous) electrocatalysts for an efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 25593-25608 (2019). 215. Yang, J. et al. Ultrahigh-current-density niobium disulfide catalysts for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Mater. 18, 1309 (2019). 216. Chen, X. B. et al. Origin of hydrogen evolution activity on MS2 (M = Mo or Nb) monolayers. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 18898-18905 (2015). 217. Yan, R. et al. Thickness dependence of superconductivity in ultrathin NbS2. Appl. Phys. Express 12 (2019). 218. Wang, H. et al. High-quality monolayer superconductor NbSe2 grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat. Commun. 8 (2017). 219. Xi, X. X., Berger, H., Forró, L., Shan, J. & Mak, K. F. Gate tuning of electronic phase transitions in two-dimensional NbSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016). 220. Wang, B. L. et al. Bifunctional NbS2-based asymmetric heterostructure for lateral and vertical electronic devices. ACS Nano 14, 175-184 (2020). 221. Sukanya, R., Alves, D. C. D. & Breslin, C. B. Review-Recent Developments in the Applications of 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides as Electrocatalysts in the Generation of Hydrogen for Renewable Energy Conversion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 169 (2022). 222. Jaramillo, T. F. et al. Identification of active edge sites for electrochemical H2 evolution from MoS2 nanocatalysts. Science 317, 100-102 (2007). 223. Qorbani, M. et al. Atomistic insights into highly active reconstructed edges of monolayer 2H-WSe2 photocatalyst. Nat. Commun. 13 (2022). 224. Ye, G. L. et al. Defects engineered monolayer MoS2 for improved hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Lett. 16, 1097-1103 (2016). 225. Xie, J. F. et al. Defect-rich MoS2 ultrathin nanosheets with additional active edge sites for enhanced electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 25, 5807-5813 (2013). 226. Voiry, D., Yang, J. & Chhowalla, M. Recent strategies for improving the catalytic activity of 2D TMD nanosheets toward the hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 28, 6197-6206 (2016). 227. McMullan, W. G. & Irwin, J. C. Raman-scattering from 2H-NbS2 and 3R-NbS2. Solid State Commun. 45, 557-560 (1983). 228. Mlack, J. T. et al. Transfer of monolayer TMD WS2 and Raman study of substrate effects. Sci. Rep. 7, 1-8 (2017). 229. Rodriguez, A. et al. Activation of Raman modes in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides through strong interaction with gold. Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022). 230. Conley, H. J. et al. Bandgap Engineering of Strained Monolayer and Bilayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 13, 3626-3630 (2013). 231. Fu, Q. D. et al. One-step synthesis of metal/semiconductor heterostructure NbS2/MoS2. Chem. Mater. 30, 4001-4007 (2018). 232. Kholimatussadiah, S. et al. Volcano-type behavior in spatially resolved electron transfer and hydrogen evolution reaction mapping over 2D electrocatalysts. Small Methods 9 (2025). 233. García, R., Magerle, R. & Perez, R. Nanoscale compositional mapping with gentle forces. Nat. Mater. 6, 405-411 (2007). 234. Zheng, X. J. & Zhu, L. L. Theoretical analysis of electric field effect on Young's modulus of nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006). 235. Liebig, A., Hapala, P., Weymouth, A. J. & Giessibl, F. J. Quantifying the evolution of atomic interaction of a complex surface with a functionalized atomic force microscopy tip. Sci. Rep. 10 (2020). 236. Wang, Z. J. et al. Nanomechanical insights into hydrophobic interactions of mineral surfaces in interfacial adsorption, aggregation and flotation processes. Chem. Eng. J. 455 (2023). 237. Zhao, B. Y. et al. Mechanical mapping of nanobubbles by PeakForce atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter 9, 8837-8843 (2013). 238. Nalaskowski, J., Nguyen, A. V., Hupka, J. & Miller, J. D. Study of particle-bubble interaction using atomic force microscopy-current possibilities and challenges. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 36, 253-272 (2002). 239. Walczyk, W. & Schönherr, H. Dimensions and the profile of surface nanobubbles: tip nanobubble interactions and nanobubble deformation in atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 30, 11955-11965 (2014). 240. Kim, Y. et al. Alloyed 2D metal-semiconductor heterojunctions: origin of interface states reduction and Schottky barrier lowering. Nano Lett. 16, 5928-5933 (2016). 241. Xu, B. et al. Alleviation of Schottky barrier heights at TMDs/metal interfaces with a tunneling layer of semiconducting InSe nanoflake. Appl. Surf. Sci. 636 (2023). 242. Kim, G. S. et al. Schottky barrier height engineering for electrical contacts of multilayered MoS2 transistors with reduction of metal-induced gap states. ACS Nano 12, 6292-6300 (2018). 243. Wang, Y. Y. et al. Does p-type ohmic contact exist in WSe2-metal interfaces? Nanoscale 8, 1179-1191 (2016). 244. Ding, X. et al. NbS2: A promising p-type ohmic contact for two-dimensional materials. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12 (2019). 245. Liu, Y. Y., Stradins, P. & Wei, S. H. Van der Waals metal-semiconductor junction: weak Fermi level pinning enables effective tuning of Schottky barrier. Sci. Adv. 2 (2016). 246. Chen, G. R. et al. Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moire superlattice. Nature 572, 215-+ (2019). 247. Balents, L., Dean, C. R., Efetov, D. K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity and strong correlations in moire flat bands. Nat. Phys. 16, 725-733 (2020). 248. Chen, G. R. et al. Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moire superlattice. Nature 581, E3-E3 (2020). 249. Tong, Q. J. et al. Topological mosaics in moire superlattices of van der Waals heterobilayers. Nat. Phys. 13, 356-362 (2017). 250. Gu, S. Z. et al. Twist angle-dependent work functions in CVD-grown twisted bilayer graphene probed by Kelvin probe force microscopy. Nanoscale 15, 5825-5833 (2023). 251. Chen, G. R. et al. Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moire superlattice. Nat. Phys. 15, 237-241 (2019). 252. Van Winkle, M., Zhang, K. D. & Bediako, D. K. Nanoscale Structure and Interfacial Electrochemical Reactivity of Moire-Engineered Atomic Layers. Accounts Chem. Res. 58, 415-427 (2025). 253. Hsieh, V. et al. Domain-Dependent Surface Adhesion in Twisted Few-Layer Graphene: Platform for Moire-Assisted Chemistry. Nano Lett. 23, 3137-3143 (2023). 254. Shabani, S. et al. Deep moire potentials in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers. Nat. Phys. 17, 720 (2021). 255. Rosenberger, M. R. et al. Twist Angle-Dependent Atomic Reconstruction and Moire Patterns in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Heterostructures. ACS Nano 14, 4550-4558 (2020). 256. Hesp, N. C. H. et al. Nano-imaging photoresponse in a moire unit cell of minimally twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 12 (2021). 257. van der Zande, A. M. et al. Tailoring the Electronic Structure in Bilayer Molybdenum Disulfide via Interlayer Twist. Nano Lett. 14, 3869-3875 (2014). 258. Liu, K. H. et al. Evolution of interlayer coupling in twisted molybdenum disulfide bilayers. Nat. Commun. 5 (2014). 259. Huang, S. X. et al. Probing the Interlayer Coupling of Twisted Bilayer MoS2 Using Photoluminescence Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 14, 5500-5508 (2014). 260. Puretzky, A. A. et al. Low-Frequency Raman Fingerprints of Two-Dimensional Metal Dichalcogenide Layer Stacking Configurations. ACS Nano 9, 6333-6342 (2015). 261. Schneider, E., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Maultzsch, J. Interlayer Raman modes in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024). 262. O'Brien, M. et al. Mapping of Low-Frequency Raman Modes in CVD-Grown Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Layer Number, Stacking Orientation and Resonant Effects. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016). 263. Puretzky, A. A. et al. Twisted MoSe2 Bilayers with Variable Local Stacking and Interlayer Coupling Revealed by Low-Frequency Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Nano 10, 2736-2744 (2016). 264. Xu, M. Z. et al. Reconfiguring nucleation for CVD growth of twisted bilayer MoS2 with a wide range of twist angles. Nat. Commun. 15 (2024). 265. Lee, C. et al. Anomalous Lattice Vibrations of Single- and Few-Layer MoS2. ACS Nano 4, 2695-2700 (2010). 266. Molina-Sánchez, A. & Wirtz, L. Phonons in single-layer and few-layer MoS2 and WS2. Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011). 267. Tonndorf, P. et al. Photoluminescence emission and Raman response of monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, and WSe2. Optics Express 21, 4908-4916 (2013). 268. Sekine, T., Izumi, M., Nakashizu, T., Uchinokura, K. & Matsuura, E. Raman-Scattering and Infrared Reflectance in 2H-MoSe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49, 1069-1077 (1980). 269. Kim, K., Lee, J. U., Nam, D. & Cheong, H. Davydov Splitting and Excitonic Resonance Effects in Raman Spectra of Few-Layer MoSe. ACS Nano 10, 8113-8120 (2016). 270. Liang, L. B. et al. Low-Frequency Shear and Layer-Breathing Modes in Raman Scattering of Two-Dimensional Materials. ACS Nano 11, 11777-11802 (2017). 271. Nam, D., Lee, J. U. & Cheong, H. Excitation energy dependent Raman spectrum of MoSe2. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015). 272. Plechinger, G. et al. Raman spectroscopy of the interlayer shear mode in few-layer MoS2 flakes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 (2012). 273. Boora, M. et al. Low-Frequency Raman Study of Large-Area Twisted Bilayers of WS2 Stacked by an Etchant-Free Transfer Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 16, 2902-2911 (2024). 274. He, J. G., Hummer, K. & Franchini, C. Stacking effects on the electronic and optical properties of bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2. Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014). 275. Yao, J. D., Zheng, Z. Q. & Yang, G. W. Promoting the Performance of Layered-Material Photodetectors by Alloy Engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 8, 12915-12924 (2016). 276. Kim, J. et al. Wafer-Scale Production of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Alloy Monolayers by Nanocrystal Conversion for Large-Scale Ultrathin Flexible Electronics. Nano Lett. 21, 10570-10571 (2021). 277. Cui, F. F. et al. Synthesis of Large-Size 1T' ReS2xSe2(1−x) Alloy Monolayer with Tunable Bandgap and Carrier Type. Adv. Mater. 29 (2017). 278. Zuo, Y. G. et al. Robust growth of two-dimensional metal dichalcogenides and their alloys by active chalcogen monomer supply. Nat. Commun. 13 (2022). 279. Tang, P. T. et al. Rapid Wafer-Scale Growth of MoS2(1–x)Se2x Alloy Monolayers with Tunable Compositions and Optical Properties for High-Performance Photodetectors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 4, 12609-12618 (2021). 280. Zhang, W. T. et al. CVD synthesis of Mo(1−x)WxS2 and MoS2(1−x)Se2x alloy monolayers aimed at tuning the bandgap of molybdenum disulfide. Nanoscale 7, 13554-13560 (2015). 281. Mann, J. et al. 2-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides with Tunable Direct Band Gaps: MoS2(1–x)Se2x Monolayers. Adv. Mater. 26, 1399-1404 (2014). 282. Bera, A., Kundu, B., Ghorai, U. K. & Pal, A. J. Alloyed transition-metal dichalcogenides (Mo1−xWxSe2) through a hydrothermal synthesis route: Probing layer-number-dependent band energies and band-gap bowing via scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7 (2023). 283. Dong, J. S., Zhao, Y. P. & Ouyang, G. The effect of alloying on the band engineering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Physica E 105, 90-96 (2019). 284. Susarla, S. et al. Quaternary 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (TMDs) with Tunable Bandgap. Adv. Mater. 29 (2017). 285. Nguyen, K. M. & Park, J. Y. Tunable bandgap and growth mechanism of WS2xSe2(1-x) monolayer alloys synthesized via chemical vapor deposition. J. Alloy Compd. 1035 (2025). 286. Duan, X. D. et al. Synthesis of WS2xSe2-2x Alloy Nanosheets with Composition-Tunable Electronic Properties. Nano Lett. 16, 264-269 (2016). 287. Kiran, V., Mukherjee, D., Jenjeti, R. N. & Sampath, S. Active guests in the MoS2/MoSe2 host lattice: efficient hydrogen evolution using few-layer alloys of MoS2(1−x)Se2x. Nanoscale 6, 12856-12863 (2014). 288. Gong, Q. F. et al. Ultrathin MoS2(1–x)Se2x Alloy Nanoflakes For Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 5, 2213-2219 (2015). 289. Lei, Y. et al. Low-temperature Synthesis of Heterostructures of Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Alloys (WxMo1-xS2) and Graphene with Superior Catalytic Performance for Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Nano 11, 5103-5112 (2017). 290. Qiao, J. H. et al. Ultrathin MoSSe alloy nanosheets anchored on carbon nanotubes as advanced catalysts for hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 44, 16110-16119 (2019). 291. Hu, P. et al. Agent-assisted VSSe ternary alloy single crystals as an efficient stable electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 15714-15721 (2019). 292. Kwon, I. S. et al. WSe2-VSe2 Alloyed Nanosheets to Enhance the Catalytic Performance of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Nano 16, 12569-12579 (2022). 293. Kwon, I. S. et al. Composition-Tuned (MoWV)Se2 Ternary Alloy Nanosheets as Excellent Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysts. ACS Nano 17, 2968-2979 (2023). 294. Chen, X. S. et al. Tuning electrochemical catalytic activity of defective 2D terrace MoSe2 heterogeneous catalyst via cobalt doping. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11357-11363 (2017). 295. Kwon, I. S. et al. MoSe2-VSe2-NbSe2 Ternary Alloy Nanosheets to Boost Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 34 (2022). 296. Fu, Q. et al. Synthesis and Enhanced Electrochemical Catalytic Performance of Monolayer WS2(1–x)Se2x with a Tunable Band Gap. Adv. Mater. 27, 4732-4738 (2015). 297. Sahin, H. et al. Anomalous Raman spectra and thickness-dependent electronic properties of WSe2. Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013). 298. Zhao, W. J. et al. Evolution of Electronic Structure in Atomically Thin Sheets of WS2 and WSe2. ACS Nano 7, 791-797 (2013). 299. Sreedhara, M. B. et al. Nanotubes from Ternary WS2(1–x)Se2x Alloys: Stoichiometry Modulated Tunable Optical Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 10530-10542 (2022). 300. Zhao, W. J. et al. Lattice dynamics in mono- and few-layer sheets of WS2 and WSe2. Nanoscale 5, 9677-9683 (2013). | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101290 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文之目的為利用掃描電化學顯微鏡對二維電催化材料在固液相介面之奈米級結構活性之研究。利用原子力顯微鏡結合掃描電化學顯微鏡,進行定量原位之介面電子轉移動力學探測,並達到高解析度之空間解析。本研究中運用並討論掃描電化學顯微鏡之兩種主要模式:回饋模式用於探測外層(弱耦合、非催化)電子轉移,基材生成與尖端收集模式應用於檢測內層(強耦合、催化)電子轉移,特別是可用於析氫反應之研究。
本文將其分為七個章節,其中包含兩章緒論與五章研究結果之深入探討。第一章闡述了研究背景、動機與目標,強調掃描電化學顯微鏡在能源相關奈米材料表徵鑑定之應用。第二章將闡述實驗與計算方法,從二維材料生長到掃描電化學顯微鏡量測細節。 第三章揭示了在析氫反應過程中氫奈米氣泡之成核、生長及脫附於石墨烯表面之觀察結果。本文視覺化了氣泡動態於不同石墨烯基材,例如高定向熱解石墨與於石墨烯覆蓋碳化矽。基材生成與尖端收集模式展示了氫氣氣泡之析出是受局域性活性位點與表面性質(邊緣、褶皺與親水性)影響。高定向熱解石墨烯之疏水性將使氣泡大小、覆蓋面積與生命週期提升。反之,親水性的石墨烯覆蓋碳化矽則會產生較小氣泡且容易從表面脫離。結果進一步揭示了石墨烯覆蓋碳化矽較高定向熱解石墨烯對於產氫反應具較優之電化學活性。 第四章揭示二硒化鎢作為電催化劑其基面活性與介面電子轉移之火山型行為。本研究發現最佳厚度為四層,由於穿隧勢壘與特定電子態密度之間的交互作用,有利於非絕熱電子轉移。奈米級電子映射和微米級電化學裝置展示了少層較單/雙層二硒化鎢能產生更快之介面電子轉移與更高的析氫反應活性。其更快的動力學與更低的析氫反應過電位歸因於費米能階附近的更高電子態密度,此外並提高電極-電解質界面處平面外電子轉移之可能性與改善平面內電荷傳輸。本研究表明透過調整二硒化鎢厚度,其基面可以被電化學活化,以用於非催化與催化電子轉移。 第五章討論了半導體二硒化鎢與金屬二硫化鈮異質結構之功能化,二硫化鈮之高功函數提高了二硒化鎢之基面電化學活性。此結果可以歸因於豐富的局域性電子狀態密度與強電子耦合,從而增強界面電子轉移動力學與電催化析氫反應。原子力顯微鏡之力-體積映射揭示二硒化鎢與金屬二硫化鈮之間的強黏附性,確保二硒化鎢在酸性環境中之穩定性。此外,在本實驗中觀察到二維二硒化鎢之層間電化學屏蔽行為,該行為選擇性地鈍化二硫化鈮表面的自然氧化。在此異質結構中實現了較低的半導體/金屬能帶偏移,這意味著肖特基勢壘高度降低,接觸電阻降低,從而提高了電荷注入效率。結果表明,二硒化鎢/二硫化鈮異質結構具有更高的電化學析氫性能和更長的穩定性。並證明利用二硫化鈮作為金屬載體,二硒化鎢基面既可用於非催化電子轉移,也可用於電催化析氫。 第六章和第七章簡要探討了層間堆疊結構和合金化分別如何影響各種二維過渡金屬二硫屬化物(如二硫化鉬、二硒化鉬、二硫化鎢、二硒化鎢與硫硒化鎢合金)之非絕熱電子轉移動力學速率。我們觀察到對應3R相之AB堆疊較對應2H相之AA'堆疊具有更高的電化學活性;此種結果很可歸因於更強的層間電子耦合,從而改善了平面內和平面外的電荷傳輸特性。同時,單層硫硒化鎢合金比二硫化鎢和二硒化鎢具有更好的電化學性能,這是由於豐富的活性位點和提高的電導率。 本論文涵蓋了二維材料的各種功能化,透過調控其形貌、異質結構、扭轉角和合金化,以及掃描電化學顯微鏡如何作為多功能原位電分析工具來全面研究界面物理和奈米級電化學,從而實現表面結構與局部電化學性質之間的直接關聯,且實用於各種應用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this thesis is to present the progress made in the nanoscale structure–electrochemical activity studies of two-dimensional (2D) electrocatalytic materials across solid–liquid interfaces with scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). Utilizing atomic force microscopy (AFM) coupled with SECM, the interfacial electron transfer dynamics is quantitatively probed in situ and spatially resolved at the nanoscale with high resolution. Here, the two main modes of SECM are thoroughly employed and discussed: SECM feedback mode is used to probe the outer-sphere/weak-coupling/non-adiabatic/non-catalytic electron transfer, while SECM substrate generation and tip collection (SG/TC) mode is used to probe the inner-sphere/strong-coupling/adiabatic/catalytic electron transfer, particularly for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).
This thesis is divided into eight chapters, which consists of two introductory chapters, followed by five chapters discussing the main findings, and one concluding chapter. Specifically, Chapter 1 describes the background, motivation, and objectives of the study, emphasizing the state of the art of the applications of SECM in the characterizations of nanomaterials for energy-related applications. The technical sections covering the experimental and computational methods are presented in Chapter 2, from the growth of 2D materials to the details of SECM measurements. Chapter 3 reveals the observation of hydrogen nanobubbles nucleation, growth, and departure from the surface of graphene during HER. We visualize the gas bubble dynamics on different graphene substrates, i.e., highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) and few-layer graphene on SiC (FLG/SiC). SECM SG/TC mode shows that the hydrogen bubble evolution is influenced by the local active sites and surface properties (edges, wrinkles, and wettability). Hydrophobic HOPG increases the size, coverage, and the lifetime of the bubbles. On the other hand, hydrophilic FLG/SiC generates smaller bubbles which tend to easily depart from the surface. The results further show that FLG/SiC is electrochemically more active than HOPG for hydrogen generation. Chapter 4 unravels the basal plane activity and volcano-type behavior of interfacial electron transfer at WSe2 electrocatalysts. We find the optimal thickness, which is four-layers, at which the nonadiabatic electron transfer becomes favorable due to the interplay between the tunneling barrier and the layer-specific electronic density of states (DOS). Nanoscale electrochemical mapping and microscale electrochemical devices show that the few-layer WSe2 generates faster interfacial electron transfer and higher HER activity than monolayer/bilayer WSe2. Faster kinetics and lower HER overpotential is assigned to the higher DOS near the Fermi level that promotes the probability of out-of-plane electron transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interface and improved in-plane charge transport. We show that WSe2 basal plane can be electrochemically activated for both non-catalytic and catalytic electron transfer by tailoring the thickness. Chapter 5 discusses the functionalization of semiconductor/metal WSe2/NbS2 heterostructures, in which the high work function metallic NbS2 improves the basal plane electrochemical activity of WSe2. This outcome is likely assigned to the enriched local DOS and strong electronic coupling, resulting in an enhancement of interfacial electron transfer kinetics and electrocatalytic hydrogen production. AFM force–volume mapping reveals a strong adhesion between NbS2 and WSe2, ensuring the stability of atomically thin WSe2 in a harsh acidic environment. Further, we observe a layer-dependent electrochemical screening behavior of 2D WSe2 which selectively passivates the surface of NbS2 from native oxidation. A lower semiconductor/metal band offset is realized in WSe2/NbS2 heterostructures, implying a reduced Schottky barrier height and lower contact resistance, resulting in an improved charge injection efficiency. The results show that WSe2/NbS2 heterostructures achieve higher electrochemical HER performance with prolonged stability. We demonstrate that the basal plane of WSe2 can be activated for both non-catalytic electron transfer and electrocatalytic HER by utilizing NbS2 as the metal support. Chapter 6 and 7 briefly explores how interlayer stacking configurations and alloying, respectively, influences the rate of nonadiabatic electron transfer kinetics at various 2D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), i.e., MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, and WSSe alloy. We observe that the AB stacking, which corresponds to the 3R phase, achieves higher electrochemical activity than the AA’ stacking, which corresponds to the 2H phase; this outcome is likely assigned to the stronger interlayer electronic coupling that improves the in-plane and out-of-plane charge transport properties. Meanwhile, monolayer WSSe alloy performs better electrochemical activity than WS2 and WSe2 possibly due to the enriched active sites and increased conductivity. In summary, this thesis covers various structural functionalization of 2D materials—i.e., by tailoring their morphology, thickness, heterostructures, twist-angle, and alloying—to modulate the electronic structures, resulting in a modified local electrochemical activity. AFM-SECM is carefully utilized to probe the in situ nanoscale electrochemistry of these modified 2D materials, enabling direct correlation between the nanoscale features and local electrochemical properties, which is useful for a wide variety of applications. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-01-13T16:14:00Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-01-13T16:14:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
Acknowledgements iii Abstract vi 摘要 x Table of Contents xiii Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Introduction to scanning electrochemical microscopy 2 1.3 Scanning electrochemical microscopy for 2D materials 5 1.4 Objectives of study 7 Chapter 2 – Methods 9 2.1 2D materials growth, exfoliation, transfer, and device fabrication 9 2.2 Scanning electrochemical microscopy 12 2.3 Materials characterizations 17 2.4 First-principle calculations 17 Chapter 3 – In situ visualization of hydrogen bubbles evolution on graphene 19 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 Results and discussion 21 3.3 Conclusion 28 Chapter 4 – Edge- and layer-dependent interfacial electron transfer and hydrogen evolution reaction on 2D WSe2 electrocatalysts 30 4.1 Introduction 30 4.2 Results and discussion 33 4.2.1 Edge- and layer-dependent outer-sphere electron transfer on WSe2 35 4.2.2 The role of tunneling barrier and electronic DOS 39 4.2.3 Electrocatalytic HER activity on 2D WSe2 44 4.3 Conclusion 52 Chapter 5 – Electrocatalytic activation of WSe2 basal plane and selective surface passivation of NbS2 with semiconductor/metal heterostructures for hydrogen evolution 53 5.1 Introduction 54 5.2 Results and discussion 56 5.2.1 Heterostructures formation 56 5.2.2 Electrochemical behavior of WSe2/NbS2 heterostructures 58 5.2.3 Electrocatalytic HER of WSe2/NbS2 heterostructures 61 5.2.4 Nanoscale surface properties of WSe2/NbS2 heterostructures 66 5.2.5 Lower band offset in WSe2/NbS2 heterostructures 71 5.3 Conclusion 73 Chapter 6 – Twist angle/interlayer stacking-dependent nanoelectrochemistry on 2D TMDs (MoSe2, MoS2, WSe2, and WS2) 75 6.1 Introduction 75 6.2 Results and discussion 77 6.3 Conclusion 84 Chapter 7 – Basal plane electrochemical activity on 2D WSSe alloy 85 7.1 Introduction 85 7.2 Results and discussion 87 7.3 Conclusion 95 Chapter 8 – Concluding remarks 96 8.1 Summary 96 8.2 Outlook 98 References 101 Research Publications 122 Conferences and Awards 124 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 二維材料 | - |
| dc.subject | 電催化 | - |
| dc.subject | 電子轉移 | - |
| dc.subject | 析氫反應 | - |
| dc.subject | 原位表徵 | - |
| dc.subject | 奈米電化學 | - |
| dc.subject | 掃描電化學顯微鏡 | - |
| dc.subject | 2D materials | - |
| dc.subject | electrocatalysis | - |
| dc.subject | electron transfer | - |
| dc.subject | hydrogen evolution reaction | - |
| dc.subject | in situ characterization | - |
| dc.subject | nanoelectrochemistry | - |
| dc.subject | scanning electrochemical microscopy | - |
| dc.title | 掃描電化學顯微鏡於二維材料奈米介面電子轉移動力學之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Probing nanoscale interfacial electron transfer dynamics in two-dimensional materials with scanning electrochemical microscopy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳貴賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Kuei-Hsien Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 邱雅萍;謝馬利歐;柯伯尼 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ya-Ping Chiu;Mario Hofmann;Mohammad Qorbani | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 二維材料; 電催化; 電子轉移; 析氫反應; 原位表徵; 奈米電化學; 掃描電化學顯微鏡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | 2D materials; electrocatalysis; electron transfer; hydrogen evolution reaction; in situ characterization; nanoelectrochemistry; scanning electrochemical microscopy | en |
| dc.relation.page | 126 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202504598 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-10-20 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-10-17 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 物理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.9 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
