請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101146完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳家麟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chialin Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李庠家 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Xiang-Jia Lee | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-31T16:06:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-01 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-12-31 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-11-21 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部份
(一)期刊文章 1. 丁淑華(2000)。組織變革認知與心理歷程。人力資源管理學報,5(3),78-95。 2. 王匯華(2012)。錢德勒命題及其後現代挑戰,東北財經大學學報,(1),17-21。取自http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=41069768 3. 李丹(2023)。大陸式現代化下塑膠產業綠色轉型的實踐路徑。塑膠科技,44(5), 120-123。取自http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7110001770 4. 李立中與羅文華(2020)。臺灣模具產業的技術創新與挑戰。機械工程學報, 36(3),78-92。取自https://doi.org/10.6504/JME. 202007_ 36(3).0003 5. 李吉仁(2024)。轉型再成長:策略架構與執行力。天下雜誌,台北。 6. 李吉仁(2019)。驅動轉型成為轉機。哈佛商業評論臺灣版,(4),84-95。取自https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0009500.html 7. 李強、張欣與劉芳(2023)。大陸塑膠行業的智慧製造趨勢。國際生產研究期刊,61(12),123-138。取自https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2056789 8. 李新鄉(2008)。組織變革定義與類型。組織管理,12(1),30-45。 9. 林秀鳳與李建然(2008),管理特質對企業績效之影響。中山管理評論,16(4),703-742。 10. 武兵書(2021)。大陸模具產業三十年發展。模具技術評論,10(2),15-25。 11. 張立(2019)。大陸經濟改革與產業增長。復旦大學出版社,上海。 12. 張強、李青(2023),大陸模具設計智慧化研究。機械工程學報,59(4),89-102。 13. 陳美惠、林宜君、黃北豪與周右昇(2019)。政治關聯、管理者能力與公司績效之關聯性。當代會計,20(2),173-215。 14. 陳富德(2024)。淺談中小型塑膠製品製造業之永續發展方向與策略。台灣經濟研究月刊,46(4),60-67。 15. 黃宇平(2021)。臺灣模具產業的全球化挑戰與應對。經濟學報,50(4),89-105。取自https://doi.org/10.7075/TJE.202110_50(4).0004 16. 黃睿、孟德芳與顧飛(2013)。關於“錢德勒命題”的思考—基於錢德勒管理思想。大陸管理資訊化,16(11),59-60。取自http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=47772708 17. 楊仁壽、卓秀足與趙芸(2009)。組織變革過程研究。管理評論,28(2),67-85. 18. 劉健(2018)。產業組織模式創新:基於錢德勒學說的綜述與分析。大陸經貿導刊,26,41-43。取自http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7000489545 19. 劉志與張明(2022)。大陸模具製造的數位轉型。大陸機械工程,33(5),67-7。 20. 吳清山與林天祐(2005),焦點團體法。教育資料與研究雙月刊,65,135-148。 21. 盧素涵(2023)。模具製造的智慧化與數位化趨勢。工業技術雜誌,15(1),22-35。http://www.itri.org.tw/publications (二)博碩士論文 1. 吳良榮(2002)。證券金融業電子化顧客關係管理策略。 [未出版碩士論文],國立臺灣科技大學。 2. 洪雪貞(2003)。以焦點團體法探討病患在醫院門診的醫療照護服務需求-以某區域教學醫院為例。[未出版碩士論文],國立雲林科技大學。 3. 遊政達(2003)。應用焦點團體探討使用者需求脈絡之研究。[未出版碩士論文],國立臺北科技大學。 4. 歐建國(2025)。從領導者角度探討塑膠模具產業國際行銷策略之挑戰-以A公司為例,[未出版碩士論文],中原大學。取自https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/U0017-0407202516414222 5. 鄭光旭(2018)。應用焦點團體法探討使用者需求脈絡之研究,[未出版碩士論文],國立臺北科技大學。 (三)研究報告 1. 周雅容(1997)。焦點團體法在調查研究上的應用。調查研究,3,51-73。 2. 梁正和(2019)。臺灣模具產業升級策略研究,經濟與管理研究,25(2),34-50。取自https://doi.org/10.6140/JEM.201906 _25(2).0002 (四)專著 1. 管倖生(2008)。設計研究方法,全華圖書。 (五)網路資料 1. 李穎傑與吳珮慈(2013)。客家委員會獎助客家學術研究計畫-美濃客家文化元素探究暨創意商品設計與評估,客委會。https://sign.hakka.gov.tw/file/Attach/1990/1/422010595671.pdf 2. 大陸塑膠加工工業協會(2023)。2022年大陸塑膠加工工業統計。http://www.cppia.com.cn 3. 大陸塑膠工業協會(2024)。大陸塑膠工業2025年市場展望。 http://www.cpia.org.cn 4. 國家發展改革委(2024)。大陸碳中和計畫2024~2030。 http://www.ndrc.gov.cn 5. 臺灣經濟研究院(2024)。供應鏈重組對台資在大陸企業的影響,http://www.teri.org.tw 6. 臺灣外貿協會(2024)。2023年台資在大陸投資趨勢。http://www.taiwantrade.com.tw 7. 大陸塑膠加工工業協會(2023)。2022年大陸塑膠加工工業統計。http://www.cppia.com.cn 8. 台灣經濟研究院(2024)。供應鏈重組對台資在大陸企業的影響。http://www.teri.org.tw 9. 台灣外貿協會(2024)。2023年台資在大陸投資趨勢。http://www.taiwantrade.com.tw 二、英文部份 (一)期刊文章 1. Adler, N. J. (2002). International dimensions of organizational behavior (4th ed.). South-Western. 2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. 3. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-116. 4. Dyer, W. G. (1985). The cycle of cultural evolution in organizations. In R. H. Kilmann (Ed.), Gaining control of the corporate culture (pp. 200-229). Jossey-Bass. 5. Freinkel, S. (2011). Plastic: A toxic love story. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 6. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). Longman. 7. Green, A. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 119-130). 8. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass. 9. Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J. W., & Woodman, R. W. (2011). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning. 10. Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1982). Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. Wiley. 11. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass. 12. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley. 13. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Pitman Publishing. 14. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press. 15. Routledge. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Sage. 16. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. 17. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass. 18. Stake, R. E. (1981). Case study methodology: An epistemological advocacy. In J. 19. Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage. 20. Yin, R. K. (2001). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage. (二)網路資料 1. Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1403-1432. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi030 2. Ahn, S. H. (2021). Customer-centric strategy and structure fit for performance of small and medium-sized manufacturing firms. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 245-253. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.245 3. Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2022). Organizational culture: Cultural change work in progress. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003154242 4. Aupperle, K. E. (2014). Revisiting strategy and structure: An empirical test of Chandler's performance theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 26(2), 137-156. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44113647 5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 6. Bentley, K. A., Newton, N. J., & Thompson, A. M. (2017). Business strategy, internal control over financial reporting, and audit reporting quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 49-69. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51693 7. Beske, P., Land, A., & Seuring, S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 131-143. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026 8. Burnes, B. (2023). Understanding the Lewin change model: Revisiting and revising for contemporary times. Journal of Change Management, 23(1), 1-23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2022.2137832 9. Chen, H. C. (2017). The application of focus group method to explore the handover experience of clinical nurse preceptors: A qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(8), 1-10. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n8p1 10. Chen, Y., Eshleman, J. D., & Soileau, J. S. (2017). Business strategy and auditor reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(2), 63-86. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51574 11. Choi, T. Y., Rogers, D., & Hart, P. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation. Journal of Operations Management, 37(3), 45-60. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1032 12. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's Q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623 13. Cimpan, C., Devanathan, S., Maheshwari, M., Owsianiak, M., Pagliero, M., & Rothmann, R. (2024). Product-service system business model for plastics industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 453, 141874. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141874 14. Cui, C., Li, S., & Zhang, A. N. (2023). Managerial ability and stock price synchronicity. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101925. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101925 15. Demerjian, P., Lev, B., & McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229-1248. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487 16. Doukas, J. A., & Zhang, R. (2021). Managerial ability, corporate social culture, and M&As. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101942. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101942 17. European Commission. (2023). The European Green Deal. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu 18. Eurostat. (2024). Environmental statistics 2023. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat 19. Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079-1108. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/256667 20. Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P., Pigosso, D. C., & Soufani, K. (2023). Drivers and barriers for circular business model innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 381-394. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3339 21. Gigliotti, R., Vardaman, J., Marshall, D. R., & Gonzalez, K. (2022). The role of perceived organizational support in individual change readiness. Journal of Change Management, 22(2), 123-141. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2022.2116078 22. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI standards: Universal standards. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org 23. Grand View Research. (2024). Medical plastics market analysis 2024~2025. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com 24. Grand View Research. (2024). Plastic market size, share & trends analysis report by product, by application, by region, and segment forecasts, 2024~2030. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/global-plastics-market 25. Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., & Rahman, S. (2017). Supply chain resilience and digital transformation: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3412-3425. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1266287 26. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 27. Harsch, K., & Festing, M. (2020). Dynamic talent management capabilities and organizational agility. Journal of World Business, 55(3), 101048. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101048 28. Hatch, M. J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 657-693. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.9402210154 29. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2023). World employment and social outlook 2023. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org 30. Kandampully, J., Zhang, T., & Bilgihan, A. (2022). Service innovation and customer experience: A post-pandemic perspective. Journal of Service Management, 33(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2021-0092 31. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299-302. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 32. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1995/05/leading-change-why-transformation-efforts-fail-2 33. Krueger, R. A. (1993). Quality control in focus group research. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 65-85). Sage. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349008.n5 34. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/focus-groups/book245498 35. Kumar, A., & Samadder, S. R. (2023). Circular transformation in plastic management lessens the carbon footprint of the plastic industry. Materials Today Sustainability, 21, 100365. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100365 36. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103 37. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. Lit, K., Evans, S., Cardenas, L. M., & Rochon, E. (2024). Business model innovation in circular start-ups: Overcoming barriers in the circular plastics economy. International Small Business Journal, 42(3), 358-388. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231217954 38. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817-835. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275676 39. Maldonado-Romo, J., Burlea-Schiopoiu, A., Khan, S. A. R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, A., Nadeem, S. P., & Rehman, S. U. (2024). Advancing sustainable manufacturing: A case study on plastic recycling. Cogent Engineering, 11(1), 2425672. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2024.2425672 40. Market Research Future. (2024). Global plastics manufacturing market research report 2024-2025. Retrieved from https://www.marketresearchfuture.com 41. Miao, G., & Zhao, X. (2023). The influence of greenwashing on green capital capability: Evidence from stakeholders' perceptions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2335-2354. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2491 42. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 43. Moreno, S. E. L., Ayola, B. L. N., Salas, R., & Nallusamy, S. (2025). Enhancement of operational efficiency in a plastic manufacturing industry through TPM, SMED, and machine learning—Case study. Sustainability, 17(16), 7445. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167445 44. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 45. Navissi, F., Sridharan, V. G., Khedmati, M., Lim, E. K. Y., & Evdokimov, E. (2017). Business strategy, over- (under-) investment, and managerial compensation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(2), 63-86. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51637 46. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2352381 47. Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570-581. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2392363 48. Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1991). The quality of managers in centralized versus decentralized organizations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1), 289-295. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2937917 49. Smithers. (2024). Biodegradable plastics market report 2024~2025. Retrieved from https://www.smithers.com 50. Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI). (2020). Historical trends in plastic production. Retrieved from https://www.plasticsindustry.org 51. Statista. (2024). Plastic market size worldwide 2033. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1060583/global-market-value-of-plastic/ 52. Statista. (2025). Global plastics manufacturing market size 2025 forecast. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com 53. Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483395685 54. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 55. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2024). Plastics recycling. Retrieved from report 2023. https://www.epa.gov 56. Wang, C. (2022). The impact of CEO power on corporate capital structure: New evidence from dynamic thresholds panel model. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 107-120. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.044 57. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207 58. World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of manufacturing report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org 59. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150 60. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 216-226. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101146 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著經濟全球化發展,企業面臨著全新的危機與挑戰,如何成為全球供應鏈中不可或缺的角色,企業就需要加速步入快速成長期,並積極開輾轉型佈局,以此適應全球化發展趨勢。相比其他行業,塑膠製造業在國際化市場中佔據重要地位,尤其是臺灣,塑膠製造商隨著加工出口導向政策迅速成長,成為帶動臺灣經濟發展的重要推手之一。C公司從事塑膠製造40餘年,並開始向大陸、歐美市場、東南亞市場推進。面對不同的市場環境與格局,C公司除了要保證產品能夠應用於電子、軍工、汽車、醫療等各個領域之外,還需要順應國際化發展趨勢,不斷對商業模式進行優化和挑戰,以便更適應外部市場發展規律,確保C公司能夠紮根於不同國家,更好地從事生產經營活動。
基於此,本文圍繞塑膠製造商新事業成長策略與轉型佈局進行研究,選擇以C公司作為案例,通過文獻資料法、案例分析法、邏輯分析法等多種方式,以C-SOP、五力分析架構、商業模式九宮格作為分析工具,分析塑膠製造產業的宏觀環境、行業環境,並針對C公司開展C-SOP分析,包括策略佈局中提升市場影響力、注重產品及技術革新、增加企業融資管道;組織協同中優化組織結構、組建單獨專案團隊、提高企業內部協同效率;興業領導中打造高素質領導團隊、精準評估領導工作、健全領導激勵機制;文化塑形中保持企業文化競爭力、營造企業文化新氛圍、積極開展企業文化效果評估。同樣,結合C公司實際情況,從目標客層、價值主張、通路結構、顧客關係、收入來源、關鍵資源、關鍵活動、關鍵夥伴、成本結構等進行商業模式轉型分析,得出C公司商業模式轉型面臨網路通路開發不足、客戶關係維繫不佳、關鍵資源亟待優化、結構成本分配失衡等困境。同時,探索C公司商業模式轉型的關鍵因素,強調C公司商業模式轉型需要通過選擇深度適應本土化戰略,精準觀察目標群體潛在需求;擴展多元籌資管道,主動規避籌資帶來的巨大風險;積極研發全新生產技術,利用數位技術驅動市場行銷;基於戰略導向重構組織架構,試著提升經營管理水準等措施,才能幫助C公司順利完成商業模式轉型,從而在國際化市場中佔據更為重要的地位。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the development of economic globalization, enterprises are facing brand-new crises and challenges. How to become an indispensable role in the global supply chain, enterprises need to accelerate into a period of rapid growth and actively carry out transformation and layout to adapt to the development trend of globalization. Compared with other industries, the plastic manufacturing industry occupies an important position in the international market, especially in Taiwan Province. With the export-oriented policy of processing, plastic manufacturers have grown rapidly and become one of the important drivers of Taiwan Province's economic development. Company C has been engaged in plastic manufacturing for more than 40 years, and has begun to promote to Chinese mainland, Europe, America and Southeast Asia. Facing different market environments and patterns, Company C should not only ensure that its products can be used in various fields, such as electronics, military industry, automobiles, medical care, etc., but also adapt to the international development trend, constantly optimize and challenge its business model, so as to better adapt to the laws of external market development and ensure that Company C can take root in different countries and better engage in production and business activities.
Based on this, this paper studies the new career growth strategy and transformation layout of plastic manufacturers, and chooses C company as a case. By means of literature review, case analysis and logical analysis, C-SOP, five-force analysis framework and business model Jiugongge are used as analysis tools to analyze the macro-environment and industry environment of plastic manufacturing industry, and C-SOP analysis is carried out for C company, including enhancing market influence, focusing on product and technological innovation, and so on. Optimize the organizational structure, set up a separate project team and improve the efficiency of internal collaboration; Build a high-quality leadership team, accurately evaluate leadership work and improve leadership incentive mechanism; Maintain the competitiveness of corporate culture, create a new atmosphere of corporate culture and actively carry out the evaluation of corporate culture effect in cultural shaping. Similarly, combined with the actual situation of Company C, this paper analyzes the business model transformation from the aspects of target customer level, value proposition, channel structure, customer relationship, income source, key resources, key activities, key partners and cost structure, and concludes that the business model transformation of Company C faces difficulties such as insufficient development of network channels, poor maintenance of customer relationship, urgent optimization of key resources and unbalanced distribution of structural costs. At the same time, it explores the key factors of C company's business model transformation, and emphasizes that C company's business model transformation needs to deeply adapt to the localization strategy and accurately understand the potential needs of the target group; Expand multiple financing channels and actively avoid the huge risks brought by financing; Actively research and develop new production technologies and use digital technology to drive marketing; Only by reconstructing the organizational structure based on strategic orientation and trying to improve the level of operation and management can C Company successfully complete the transformation of its business model and occupy a more important position in the international market. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-12-31T16:06:46Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-12-31T16:06:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員會審定書 I 致謝 II 中文摘要 III THESIS ABSTRACT IV 目次 VI 圖次 VIII 表次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究問題與目的 2 1.3 研究流程與技術路線 5 1.4 研究方法 9 第二章 文獻探討與綜述 15 2.1 組織文化與變革 15 2.2 企業轉型 C-SOP 17 2.3 企業價值鏈與企業價值 21 2.4 理論綜述 24 第三章 研究田野與C個案概述 27 3.1 全球塑膠製造業產業概述 27 3.2 大陸模具製造業發展歷程 30 3.3 臺灣塑膠製造產業發展概況 32 3.4 C個案公司概述 34 第四章 C公司競爭動態能力分析與困境之探討 38 4.1 C公司PEST情勢分析 40 4.2 C公司當前商業模式之探討 47 4.3 C公司經營競爭現況分析 52 4.4 C公司現存經營困境與發展威脅分析 60 第五章 C公司轉型策略與佈局之探討(群體焦點法) 69 5.1 企業轉型能力C SOP分析 72 5.2 動態競爭策略與新價值主張 75 5.3 新商業模式創新 95 5.4 轉型佈局(C-SOP 四軸) 103 第六章 C公司轉型策略與佈局之探討 118 6.1 研究結論 118 6.2 管理意涵 120 6.3 研究貢獻 124 6.4 研究限制 125 參考文獻 127 圖次 圖1-1:研究流程圖 7 圖1-2:研究流程圖 8 圖2- 1:公司轉型的 C-SOP 架構 19 圖4-1:臺灣跟大陸GDP增長趨勢(2020~2024年) 43 圖4-2:ESG綜合概念圖 45 圖4-3:C公司當前之商業模式九宮格 51 圖5-1:C 公司與領先群的動態競爭架構 82 圖5-2:C公司價值地圖與顧客素描需求對照 91 圖5-3:C公司2025~2034年策略轉型期之商業模式畫布 102 圖5-4:C公司策略佈局 105 圖5-5:C公司融資管道規劃 107 圖5-6:RACI矩陣 109 圖5-7:C公司企業文化轉型重點 115 表次 表1-1:參與本研究焦點團體法的成員列表 14 表4-1:大陸與臺灣塑膠限制法規彙整 42 表4-2:C公司PEST分析總覽 47 表4-3:問題-成因-影響矩陣 53 表4-4:結合企業五管與PEST之SWOT分析架構 54 表4-5:C公司現行結合企業五管與PEST之SWOT分析 56 表4-6:C公司現行SO、WO、ST、WT策略分析表 59 表4-7:C公司現存經營困境與發展威脅矩陣 60 表5-1:C公司領導評估模型 113 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 塑膠行業 | - |
| dc.subject | 新事業成長 | - |
| dc.subject | 商業模式轉型 | - |
| dc.subject | Plastic industry | - |
| dc.subject | New career growth | - |
| dc.subject | Business model transformation | - |
| dc.title | 塑膠製造商新事業成長策略與轉型佈局-以C公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | New career growth strategy and transformation layout of plastic manufacturers-taking C company as an example | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 簡睿哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Ruey-Jer Jean | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭明;李緒紅 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ming Zheng;Xuhong Li | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 塑膠行業,新事業成長商業模式轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Plastic industry,New career growthBusiness model transformation | en |
| dc.relation.page | 136 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202504692 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-11-24 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-11-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.91 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
