Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 環境工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/100934
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蕭大智zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorTa-Chih Hsiaoen
dc.contributor.authorKijpat Thavornzh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKijpat Thavornen
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-26T16:09:27Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-27-
dc.date.copyright2025-11-26-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-08-26-
dc.identifier.citationAdams, P. J., & Seinfeld, J. H. (2002). Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107(D19), AAC 4-1-AAC 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001010
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., & Schultz, M. G. (2001). Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D19), 23073-23095. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807
Black, T. L. (1994). The new NMC mesoscale Eta Model: description and forecast examples [Article]. Weather & Forecasting, 9(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0265:TNNMEM>2.0.CO;2
Brean, J., Rowell, A., Beddows, D. C. S., Shi, Z., & Harrison, R. M. (2023). Estimates of Future New Particle Formation under Different Emission Scenarios in Beijing. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(12), 4741-4750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08348
Brouwer, D. H., Lidén, G., Asbach, C., Berges, M. G. M., & van Tongeren, M. (2014). Chapter 5 - Monitoring and Sampling Strategy for (Manufactured) Nano Objects, Agglomerates and Aggregates (NOAA): Potential Added Value of the NANODEVICE Project. In U. Vogel, K. Savolainen, Q. Wu, M. van Tongeren, D. Brouwer, & M. Berges (Eds.), Handbook of Nanosafety (pp. 173-206). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416604-2.00005-6
Croft, B., Martin, R., Moore, R., Ziemba, L., Crosbie, E., Liu, H., Russell, L., Saliba, G., Wisthaler, A., Müller, M., Schiller, A., Galí Tàpias, M., Chang, R., McDuffie, E., Bilsback, K., & Pierce, J. (2021). Factors controlling marine aerosol size distributions and their climate effects over the northwest Atlantic Ocean region. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21, 1889-1916. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021
Croft, B., Martin, R. V., Chang, R. Y.-W., Bindle, L., Eastham, S. D., Estrada, L. A., Ford, B., Li, C., Long, M. S., Lundgren, E. W., Sinha, S., Sulprizio, M. P., Tang, Y., van Donkelaar, A., Yantosca, R. M., Zhang, D., Zhu, H., & Pierce, J. R. (2024). Toward Fine Horizontal Resolution Global Simulations of Aerosol Sectional Microphysics: Advances Enabled by GCHP-TOMAS. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 16(10), e2023MS004094. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS004094
D'Amato, G., Pawankar, R., Vitale, C., Lanza, M., Molino, A., Stanziola, A., Sanduzzi, A., Vatrella, A., & D'Amato, M. (2016). Climate Change and Air Pollution: Effects on Respiratory Allergy. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res, 8(5), 391-395. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2016.8.5.391
Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., & Wagner, R. (2005). Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: Eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 10, 323-336.
Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W., Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P., Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., & Rummukaines, M. (2013). Evaluation of Climate Models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In.
GEOS–Chem-Wiki. (2021). APM aerosol microphysics. GEOS-Chem Wiki. Retrieved May 24 from Retrieved from https://wiki.seas.harvard.edu/geos-chem/index.php/APM_aerosol_microphysics
Gillespie, P., Tajuba, J., Lippmann, M., Chen, L.-C., & Veronesi, B. (2013). Particulate matter neurotoxicity in culture is size-dependent. NeuroToxicology, 36, 112-117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2011.10.006
Jacob, D., Petersen, J., Eggert, B., Alias, A., Christensen, O. B., Bouwer, L. M., Braun, A., Colette, A., Déqué, M., Georgievski, G., Georgopoulou, E., Gobiet, A., Menut, L., Nikulin, G., Haensler, A., Hempelmann, N., Jones, C., Keuler, K., Kovats, S., . . . Yiou, P. (2014). EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Regional Environmental Change, 14(2), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
Jacobson, M. Z. (2005). Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139165389
Karagulian, F., Belis, C. A., Dora, C. F. C., Prüss-Ustün, A. M., Bonjour, S., Adair-Rohani, H., & Amann, M. (2015). Contributions to cities' ambient particulate matter (PM): A systematic review of local source contributions at global level. Atmospheric Environment, 120, 475-483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087
Lushnikov, A. A. (2010). Introduction to Aerosols. In Aerosols ‐ Science and Technology (pp. 1-41). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527630134.ch1
Mareddy, A. R. (2017). 5 - Impacts on air environment. In A. R. Mareddy (Ed.), Environmental Impact Assessment (pp. 171-216). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811139-0.00005-0
Napari, I., Noppel, M., Vehkamäki, H., & Kulmala, M. (2002). Parametrization of ternary nucleation rates for H2SO4-NH3-H2O vapors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107(D19), AAC 6-1-AAC 6-6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002132
Olin, M., Patoulias, D., Kuuluvainen, H., Niemi, J. V., Rönkkö, T., Pandis, S. N., Riipinen, I., & Dal Maso, M. (2022). Contribution of traffic-originated nanoparticle emissions to regional and local aerosol levels. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22(2), 1131-1148. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1131-2022
Park, S. J., Lugon, L., Jacquot, O., Kim, Y., Baudic, A., D'Anna, B., Di Antonio, L., Di Biagio, C., Dugay, F., Favez, O., Ghersi, V., Gratien, A., Kammer, J., Petit, J. E., Sanchez, O., Valari, M., Vigneron, J., & Sartelet, K. (2025). Population exposure to outdoor NO2, black carbon, and ultrafine and fine particles over Paris with multi-scale modelling down to the street scale. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25(6), 3363-3387. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3363-2025
Piracha, A., & Chaudhary, M. T. (2022). Urban Air Pollution, Urban Heat Island and Human Health: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 14(15), 9234. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9234
Powell, B. (2016). Chapter 22 - Statistical Modelling of Climate Change. In T. M. Letcher (Ed.), Climate Change (Second Edition) (pp. 341-354). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63524-2.00022-1
Read, S. A. K., Jiménez, A. S., Ross, B. L., Aitken, R. J., & van Tongeren, M. (2014). Chapter 2 - Nanotechnology and Exposure Scenarios. In U. Vogel, K. Savolainen, Q. Wu, M. van Tongeren, D. Brouwer, & M. Berges (Eds.), Handbook of Nanosafety (pp. 17-58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416604-2.00002-0
Romieu, I., Castro-Giner, F., Kunzli, N., & Sunyer, J. (2008). Air pollution, oxidative stress and dietary supplementation: a review. Eur Respir J, 31(1), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00128106
Spyrou, C., Mitsakou, C., Kallos, G., Louka, P., & Vlastou, G. (2010). An improved limited area model for describing the dust cycle in the atmosphere [https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013682]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115(D17). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013682
Tie, X., Brasseur, G., & Ying, Z. (2010). Impact of model resolution on chemical ozone formation in Mexico City: application of the WRF-Chem model. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10(18), 8983-8995. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8983-2010
Trivitayanurak, W., Adams, P. J., Spracklen, D. V., & Carslaw, K. S. (2008). Tropospheric aerosol microphysics simulation with assimilated meteorology: model description and intermodel comparison. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8, 3149-3168.
Vander Hoorn, S., Johnson, J. S., Murray, K., Smit, R., Heyworth, J., Lam, S., & Cope, M. (2022). Emulation of a Chemical Transport Model to Assess Air Quality under Future Emission Scenarios for the Southwest of Western Australia. Atmosphere, 13(12), 2009. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/12/2009
Vehkamäki, H., Kulmala, M., Napari, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Timmreck, C., Noppel, M., & Laaksonen, A. (2002). An improved parameterization for sulfuric acid–water nucleation rates for tropospheric and stratospheric conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107(D22), AAC 3-1-AAC 3-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002184
Wang, K., Ma, X., Tian, R., & Yu, F. (2023). Analysis of new particle formation events and comparisons to simulations of particle number concentrations based on GEOS-Chem–advanced particle microphysics in Beijing, China. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23(7), 4091-4104. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4091-2023
Watson AY, Bates RR, & D, K. (1988). Air Pollution, the Automobile, and Public Health. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK218156/
Westervelt, D. M., Pierce, J. R., & Adams, P. J. (2014). Analysis of feedbacks between nucleation rate, survival probability and cloud condensation nuclei formation. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14(11), 5577-5597. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5577-2014
Xu, R., Wang, D., Li, J., Wan, H., Shen, S., & Guo, X. (2023). A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Air Quality Prediction Based on the Time–Frequency Domain Relationship. Atmosphere, 14(2), 405. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/2/405
Yin, L., Wang, L., Zheng, W., Ge, L., Tian, J., Liu, Y., Yang, B., & Liu, S. (2022). Evaluation of Empirical Atmospheric Models Using Swarm-C Satellite Data. Atmosphere, 13(2), 294. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/2/294
Zhao, H., Che, H., Zhang, X., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, Y. (2013). Characteristics of visibility and particulate matter (PM) in an urban area of Northeast China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 4(4), 427-434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2013.049
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/100934-
dc.description.abstract超細懸浮微粒(Ultrafine particles, UFPs,粒徑 <0.1 µm)具有高度健康風險,但由於大氣過程複雜,其精確模擬與控制仍具挑戰性。本研究針對亞熱帶都市環境的臺中市進行超細懸浮微粒動態特徵之探討。
研究利用 2021 年 4 月的觀測資料,包含粒徑數目分布(PNSDs, 11.8–593.5 nm)、硫酸濃度以及氣象參數,並採用配置 15 個粒徑分箱的 GEOS-Chem-TOMAS 模式,測試五種成核機制(Base、Binary、Binary ion、Ternary、Ternary ion),以評估主要新粒子生成(New Particle Formation, NPF)過程。
模擬結果顯示,Base、Ternary 與 Ternary ion 機制產生零星成核爆發,而 Binary 機制作用極為有限。雖然硫酸(H2SO4)濃度高峰與爆發現象同時出現,但線性相關性極弱(Pearson R ≈ -0.04),顯示 NPF 為高度複合性的多因子過程。
統計比較結果指出,GEOS-Chem-TOMAS 模式對各粒徑模式下的粒子數濃度(PNCs)皆有顯著低估(NMBs:-8.5% 至 -90.9%),相關係數亦偏低(0.06–0.21),顯示模式難以重現觀測變化。
重要的是,無論觀測或模擬皆顯示在 2021 年 4 月缺乏典型「香蕉型」NPF 事件,而背景氣膠主要由 Aitken 與累積模態主導。模擬中的零星爆發未導致持續成長,顯示臺中市大氣條件普遍不利於持續 NPF 發生。
本研究結果凸顯模式改良之迫切需求。未來建議改進成核與成長參數化、引入更高解析度之都市排放清單,並提升氣象輸入準確性。同時,後續觀測應增設 <10 nm 粒徑偵測儀器,以加強對 NPF 的限制與模式評估。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUltrafine particles (UFPs, <0.1 µm) pose significant health risks, yet their accurate modeling and control remain challenging due to complex atmospheric processes. This study investigated UFP dynamics in Taichung City, Taiwan, a subtropical urban environment.
The research utilized comprehensive observational data from April 2021, including particle number size distributions (PNSDs, 11.8–593.5 nm), sulfuric acid, and meteorological parameters. The GEOS-Chem-TOMAS model, configured with 15 size bins, tested five nucleation schemes (Base, Binary, Binary ion, Ternary, Ternary ion) to assess dominant New Particle Formation (NPF) mechanisms.
Simulation results showed sporadic nucleation bursts from Base, Ternary, and Ternary ion schemes, with negligible activity from Binary schemes. While elevated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) peaks coincided with bursts, a weak linear correlation (Pearson R ≈ -0.04) indicated NPF is a complex, multi-factorial process.
A statistical comparison revealed the GEOS-Chem-TOMAS model consistently and significantly underestimated observed particle number concentrations (PNCs) across all modes (NMBs: -8.5% to -90.9%). Correlation coefficients were low (0.06–0.21), showing the model struggled to reproduce observed variability.
Crucially, both observations and simulations consistently lacked classical "banana-shaped" NPF events throughout April 2021. Instead, background aerosols in Aitken and accumulation modes dominated. Sporadic simulated bursts did not lead to sustained growth, suggesting Taichung's atmospheric conditions were generally unfavorable for sustained NPF.
These findings highlight the critical need for targeted model improvements. Future enhancements should focus on refining nucleation/growth parameterizations, incorporating higher-resolution urban emission inventories, and enhancing meteorological inputs. Employing sub-10 nm detection instruments in future observations would also improve NPF constraint and model evaluation.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-11-26T16:09:27Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-11-26T16:09:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents


口試委員會審定書 i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT v
Table of Contents vii
List of Figures x
List of Tables xii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Research objectives 3
1.3 Scope of study 3
1.4 Limitations 4
1.5 Expected outcome 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 Particulate Matter 5
2.1.1 Definition and categorization 5
2.1.2 Source of PM 6
2.1.3 Effects of PM 7
2.2 Modeling of atmospheric pollutants 8
2.2.1 Process in the atmosphere 8
2.2.2 Aerosol microphysics process 10
2.2.3 Box model 12
2.2.4 Different types of models 13
2.2.5 Chemical transport model 16
2.3 GEOS-chem model 17
2.3.1 Overview 17
2.3.2 Full chemistry simulation 18
2.3.3 TOMAS microphysics module 19
2.3.4 APM microphysics module 20
2.4 Measurement of ambient PM and their precursors 21
2.5 New Particle Formation 22
2.6 Literature Review 24
a. New particle formation event 24
b. Modeling study of new particle formation 25
c. New particle formation event in Asia in a recent study 27
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 29
3.1 Overview of the research steps 29
3.2 The study area 29
3.3 Atmospheric modeling 29
3.3.1 Model setup 29
3.3.2 Simulations of nucleation scenarios 30
3.4 Observation data 31
3.5 Criteria of NPF 31
Chapter 4 Research Results 34
4.1 Observation of New Particle Formation (NPF) Events 34
4.1.1 Particle Size Distribution from SMPS Observations 34
4.1.2 Meteorological Conditions Associated with NPF 37
4.1.3 Background Aerosol Characteristics 39
4.2 Evaluation of GEOS-Chem-TOMAS Model Performance 46
4.2.1 Simulated PNSD Contour 46
4.2.2 Time-Averaged Particle Number Size Distribution and Variability 49
4.2.3 Total and Mode-Specific Particle Number Concentrations 51
4.2.4 Diurnal Variation 58
4.2.5 Size Distribution Snapshots 61
4.2.6 Potential Causes of Discrepancies 64
4.3 Sensitivity Study on Nucleation Mechanisms 67
4.3.1 Nucleation Rates 67
4.3.2 Statistical Comparison 71
Chapter 5 Conclusion 75
Reference 80
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject超細懸浮微粒-
dc.subject新粒子生成-
dc.subjectGEOS-Chem-TOMAS-
dc.subject大氣模式-
dc.subject氣膠動態-
dc.subject臺中市-
dc.subjectUltrafine particles-
dc.subjectNew Particle Formation-
dc.subjectGEOS-Chem-TOMAS-
dc.subjectAtmospheric modeling-
dc.subjectAerosol dynamics-
dc.subjectTaichung City-
dc.title研究臺中市超細懸浮微粒之特性、來源與歸趨zh_TW
dc.titleA Study of Characteristics, Origins and Fates of Ultrafine Particles over Taichung City, Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear114-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisorWin Trivitayanurakzh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorWin Trivitayanuraken
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeKhemarath Osathaphan;Sirima Panyametheekulzh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeKhemarath Osathaphan;Sirima Panyametheekulen
dc.subject.keyword超細懸浮微粒,新粒子生成GEOS-Chem-TOMAS大氣模式氣膠動態臺中市zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordUltrafine particles,New Particle FormationGEOS-Chem-TOMASAtmospheric modelingAerosol dynamicsTaichung Cityen
dc.relation.page83-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202504426-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-08-27-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept環境工程學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-11-27-
顯示於系所單位:環境工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-114-1.pdf7.79 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved