請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/100245完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張榮珍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jung-Chen Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蕭勻甯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yun-Ning Xiao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-30T16:08:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-01 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-30 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 真實世界證據的研究設計— 務實性臨床試驗的考量重點. (2021, January 20). 衛生福利部食物藥物管理署. https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/siteListContent.aspx?sid=9354&id=35775
真實世界證據的研究設計— 務實性臨床試驗的考量重點（草案）. (2020, August 28). 衛生福利部食物藥物管理署https://regulation.cde.org.tw/10254/4045/54717/regPost Agarwal, P., Mukerji, G., Desveaux, L., Ivers, N. M., Bhattacharyya, O., Hensel, J. M., Shaw, J., Bouck, Z., Jamieson, T., Onabajo, N., Cooper, M., Marani, H., Jeffs, L., & Bhatia, R. S. (2019). Mobile App for Improved Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(1), e10321. https://doi.org/10.2196/10321 Akram S., Bibi F., Parveen N. (2024). Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding patient safety and factors associated to it. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024:952. DOI: 10.54112/bcsrjv2024i1.952 Andre, E. B., Reynolds, R., Caubel, P., Azoulay, L., & Dreyer, N. A. (2020). Trial Designs Using Real‐world Data: The Changing Landscape of the Regulatory Approval Process. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf., 29(10), 1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4932 Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12. Chunyu, Y., Cutler, D., & Nichol, M. (2007). Using the PHQ-2 to screen for depression in the general population. *Journal of Affective Disorders, 99*(1-3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.003 De Gagne, J. C., Park, H. K., Hall, K., Woodward, A., Yamane, S., & Kim, S. S. (2019). Microlearning in health professions education: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(2), e13997. https://doi.org/10.2196/13997 Demirelli, A., Güner, E. I., & Uyar, M. (2024). The effect of self-efficacy and online learning attitude on e-learning performance in nursing education. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01621-1 DeVellis R. F. (1998). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. CA: Sage. Dolan, E. D., Mohr, D., Lempa, M., Joos, S., Fihn, S. D., Nelson, K. M., & Helfrich, C. D. (2015). Using a single item to measure burnout in primary care staff: A psychometric evaluation. *Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30*(5), 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3112-6 Doorenbos, A. Z., Haozous, E., Jang, M. K., & Langford, D. J. (2019). Sequential multiple assignment randomization trial (SMART) designs for nursing research. Research in Nursing & Health, 42(6), 429–435 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00653 Doorenbos, A. Z., & Kato, Y. (2020). Pragmatic clinical trials: Increasing the rate of translating nursing research into practice†. Japan journal of nursing science: JJNS, 17(3), e12350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12350 Food and Drug Administration. (2017, August). Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Medical Devices.https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/use-real-world-evidence-support-regulatory-decision-making-medical-devices Food and Drug Administration. (2019, May). Submitting documents using real-world data and real-world evidence to FDA for drugs and biologics. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/submitting-documents-utilizing-real-world-data-and-real-world-evidence-fda-drugs-and-biologics Ford, I., & Norrie, J. (2016). Pragmatic Trials. N Engl J Med, 375(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1510059 Garrison, G. D., Baia, P., Canning, J. E., & Strang, A. F. (2015). An asynchronous learning approach for the instructional component of a dual-campus pharmacy resident teaching program. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 79(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79229 Hug, T. (2007). Didactics of microlearning. Waxmann Verlag. Hull, C. (2024). Mastery Learning: The Educator’s Guide. Otus. Retrieved from https://otus.com/resources/guides/mastery-learning Innab, S., Abuzinadah, S., & Tayeb, H. (2022). The impact of a 12-hour educational program on nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Nursing, 21, Article 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01028-4 Itani, K. M. f., & Reda, D. J. (2017). Clinical Trials Design in Operative and Non Operative Invasive Procedures. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53877-8 Jeong, N.-Y., Kim, S.-H., Lim, E., & Choi, N.-K. (2020). Pragmatic clinical trials for real-world evidence: Concept and implementation. Cardiovascular Prevention and Pharmacotherapy, 2(3), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.36011/cpp.2020.2.e12 Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2003). The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care, 41(11), 1284–1292. https://doi.org10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C Leary, A., Besse, B., & André, F. (2024). The need for pragmatic, affordable, and practice-changing real-life clinical trials in oncology. Lancet (London, England), 403(10424), 406–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02199-2 Lee, Y. C., Chiang, T. H., Chiu, H. M., Su, W. W., Chou, K. C., Chen, S. L., Yen, A. M., Fann, J. C., Chiu, S. Y., Chuang, S. L., Chen, Y. R., Chen, S. D., Hu, T. H., Fang, Y. J., Wu, M. S., Chen, T. H., Yeh, Y. P., & Collaborators of Taiwan Community-based Integrated Screening Group (2024). Screening for Helicobacter pylori to Prevent Gastric Cancer: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 332(19), 1642–1651. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.14887 Le-rademacher, J., Gunn, heather, Yao, xiaoxi, & Schaid, D. J. (2023). Clinical Trials Overview: From Explanatory to Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 98(8), 1241–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.04.013 Liew, S. C., Tan, M. P., Breen, E., Krishnan, K., Sivarajah, I., Raviendran, N., Aung, T., Nimir, A., & Pallath, V. (2023). Microlearning and online simulation-based virtual consultation training module for the undergraduate medical curriculum: A preliminary evaluation. BMC Medical Education, 23, 796. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04777-1 Liu, C., Snyder Sulmasy, L., & Santen, S. A. (2020).Development of a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Curriculum for Breaking Bad News. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 23(10), 1374–1378.https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0606 Loudon, K., Treweek, S., Sullivan, F., Donnan, P., Thorpe, K. E., & Zwarenstein, M. (2015). The PRECIS-2 Tool: Designing Trials That Are Fit for Purpose. BMJ., 350, h1247. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2147 Loudon, K., Zwarenstein, M., Sullivan, F. M., Donnan, P. T., Gágyor, I., Hobbelen, H. J. S. M., Althabe, F., Krishnan, J. A., & Treweek, S. (2017). The PRECIS-2 tool has good interrater reliability and modest discriminant validity. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 88, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.001 Maroufizadeh, S., Omani-Samani, R., Almasi-Hashiani, A., Amini, P., & Sepidarkish, M. (2019). The reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and PHQ-2 in patients with infertility. *Reproductive Health, 16*(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0692-0 Meako, C. L., Thompson, H. J., Cochrane, B. B., & Johnson, J. (2015). Factors influencing nurses’ knowledge of delirium: A study of e-learning effectiveness. BMC Medical Education, 15, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0289-2 MyTEMP writing committee (2022). Personalised cooler dialysate for patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis (MyTEMP): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet (London, England), 400(10364), 1693–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01805-0 Nicholls, S. G., Carroll, K., Hey, S. P., Zwarenstein, M., Zhang, J. Z., Nix, H. P., Brehaut, J. C., Mckenzie, J. E., Mcdonald, S., Weijer, C., Fergusson, D. A., & Taljaard, M. (2021). A Review of Pragmatic Trials Found a High Degree of Diversity in Design and Scope, Deficiencies in Reporting and Trial Registry Data, and Poor Indexing. J Clin Epidemiol., 137, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.021 Platt R, Bosworth HB, Simon GE. Making Pragmatic Clinical Trials More Pragmatic. JAMA. 2024;332(22):1875–1876. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.19528 Rudolph, M. J., Daugherty, K. K., Ray, M. E., Shuford, V. P., Lebovitz, L., & DiVall, M. V. (2019). Best Practices Related to Examination Item Construction and Post-hoc Review. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 83(7), 7204. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7204 Roland, M., & Torgerson, D. J. (1998). Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials? BMJ, 24, 316. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7127.285 Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of chronic diseases, 20(8), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0 Sung, M. (2020). Psychometric properties of a single-item burnout measure based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. *Occupational Medicine, 70*(5), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa053 Tang, Y. M., Chen, P. C., Law, K. M. Y., Wu, C. H., Lau, Y. Y., Guan, J., He, D., & Ho, G. T. S. (2021). Comparative analysis of Student's live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Computers & education, 168, 104211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211 Ullman, A. J., Beidas, R. S., & Bonafide, C. P. (2022). Methodological progress note: Hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trials. Journal of hospital medicine, 17(11), 912–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.12936 Vazquez, M. A., Oliver, G., Amarasingham, R., Sundaram, V., Chan, K., Ahn, C., Zhang, S., Bickel, P., Parikh, S. M., Wells, B., Miller, R. T., Hedayati, S., Hastings, J., Jaiyeola, A., Nguyen, T. M., Moran, B., Santini, N., Barker, B., Velasco, F., Myers, L., … ICD-Pieces Study Group (2024). Pragmatic Trial of Hospitalization Rate in Chronic Kidney Disease. The New England journal of medicine, 390(13), 1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2311708 Wallis, K. A., & Elley, C. R. (2022). Trial and Error: Challenges Conducting Pragmatic Trials in General Practice. Br J Gen Pract, 72(715), 54–55. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718289. Weinfurt, K. P., Hernandez, A. F., Coronado, G. D., DeBar, L. L., Dember, L. M., Green, B. B., Heagerty, P. J., Huang, S. S., James, K. T., Jarvik, J. G., Larson, E. B., Mor, V., Platt, R., Rosenthal, G. E., Septimus, E. J., Simon, G. E., Staman, K. L., Sugarman, J., Vazquez, M., … Curtis, L. H. (2017). Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), Article 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7 Wendler, D. (2015). “Targeted” Consent for Pragmatic Clinical Trials. J Gen Intern Med, 30(5), 679–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3169-2 Williams, H. C., Burden-Teh, E., & Nunn, A. J. (2015). What is a pragmatic clinical trial?. The Journal of investigative dermatology, 135(6), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.134 Winget M, Persky AM. A Practical Review of Mastery Learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Dec;86(10):ajpe8906. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8906. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PMID: 35027359; PMCID: PMC10159400. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/100245 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 【背景與目的】隨著真實世界數據（Real World Data, RWD）與真實世界證據（Real World Evidence, RWE）在醫療決策中日益普及，務實性臨床試驗（Pragmatic Clinical Trials, PCT）因其設計貼近常規臨床實務，已成為連接研究與臨床應用的關鍵工具。然而，台灣臨床研究護理師對PCT的認知普遍不足，且缺乏系統性教育資源。鑑於數位科技日新月異，線上教學已成為當前教育發展的重要趨勢。為此，本研究旨在探究數位化學習工具如何與護理專業知識結合，以提升護理人員的學習成效，評估線上微課程對具臨床試驗照護經驗之護理師PCT知識理解之提升成效，並探討心理狀態及學習者特質對學習成效的影響。此研究結果將為未來護理教育訓練提供重要的實證參考。
【方法】本研究採用單組前後測之類實驗設計，透過便利與滾雪球取樣法進行招募。受試者於REDCap平台完成前測問卷後，觀看約8分鐘的PCT線上微課程（透過平台或外接至YouTube播放），隨即進行後測。研究工具包括18題PCT知識測驗、7題學習者主導量表與6題學習動機量表、PHQ-2憂鬱2題及職業倦怠評估1題。所有數據使用SPSS 26.0進行描述及推論性統計，包含獨立樣本T檢定、配對樣本T檢定、皮爾森積差相關係數、階層迴歸分析及逐步迴歸分析。 【結果】本研究最終納入 150 位具臨床試驗照護經驗之護理人員，以女性為主（89.3%），平均年齡 37.8 歲；七成最高學歷為大學。八分鐘線上微課程介入後，務實性臨床試驗知識後測（15.44 ± 3.05）顯著高於前測（10.84 ± 4.25）（t = 13.57，p < .001）。後測成績與學習者主導（r = .21）及自我效能（r = .20）呈正相關，與憂鬱（r = –.23）及職業倦怠（r = –.21）呈負相關（皆 p < .05）。階層迴歸顯示控制人口與臨床背景後，憂鬱為影響學習成效的顯著負向因子（β = –.24, p < .05），總解釋力達56.5%；逐步迴歸模型則納入六項顯著預測變項，解釋力33.9%，其中臨床背景、近期培訓時數與憂鬱程度具重要影響；敏感度分析以心理變項二分法重新建模，模型解釋力提升至 56.7%（F = 33.324，p < .001），顯示「無職業倦怠」與「心情良好」者學習成效最佳。整體而言，線上微課程有效提升護理人員之 PCT 知識，學習成效受心理狀態顯著影響，未來教育設計應考量學員的心理健康，以達更佳學習效果。 【結論】本研究證實，線上微課程是提升護理人員務實性臨床試驗（PCT）知識的有效途徑，並發現學習成效與護理人員的心理特質及臨床背景密切相關。結果顯示，較高自我效能與學習者主導特質者為正向驅動力，反之，情緒憂鬱、職業倦怠或特定的臨床單位科別經驗則與學習成效不佳相關。綜合以上，本研究支持微課程為臨床教育中具效能且可複製之教學模式，未來可進一步依據學習者差異設計分層教材，以優化學習成果並強化實務應用力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background and Objective: As real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) gain prominence in healthcare decision-making, pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) have become essential for bridging research and routine practice. In Taiwan, clinical research nurses often lack sufficient knowledge of PCTs and access to structured educational resources. With the rise of digital learning, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an online microlearning course in enhancing PCT knowledge among nurses involved in clinical trials. It also explores how psychological factors and learner characteristics influence learning outcomes. The findings will provide valuable insights for advancing nursing education and training.
Methods: This study employed a single-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling. After completing a pretest questionnaire via the REDCap platform, participants viewed an 8-minute online microlearning video on PCTs (hosted on the platform or linked to YouTube), followed immediately by a posttest. Instruments included an 18-item PCT knowledge test, a self-efficacy scale (comprising 7 items on learner autonomy and 6 on learning motivation), the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) depression scale, and a single-item burnout measure. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 for both descriptive and inferential statistics, including independent and paired-sample t-tests, Pearson’s correlation, hierarchical regression, and stepwise regression analyses. Results: A total of 150 nurses with clinical trial experience were enrolled, predominantly female (89.3%) with a mean age of 37.8 years; 70% held a bachelor's degree. Following the 8-minute online microlearning intervention, posttest scores on PCT knowledge (15.44 ± 3.05） were significantly higher than pretest scores (10.84 ± 4.25) (t = 13.57, p < .001). Posttest scores were positively correlated with learner autonomy (r = .21) and self-efficacy (r = .20), and negatively correlated with depression (r = –.23) and burnout (r = –.21) (all p < .05). Hierarchical regression showed that, after controlling for demographic and clinical variables, depressive score was a significant negative predictor of learning outcomes (β = –.24, p < .05), with the model explaining 56.5% of the variance. Stepwise regression identified six significant associated factors, accounting for 33.9% of variance, with clinical background, recent training hours, and depression level being key factors. Sensitivity analysis using dichotomized psychological variables improved explanatory power to 56.7% (F = 33.324, p < .001), indicating that participants with no burnout and positive mood had the best learning outcomes. Overall, the microlearning course effectively enhanced PCT knowledge among nurses, with psychological well-being significantly influencing learning performance. Future educational interventions should consider learners’ mental health to optimize outcomes. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that online microlearning is an effective approach for enhancing nurses’ knowledge of pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs). Learning outcomes were closely associated with psychological condition and clinical background. Higher self-efficacy and learner autonomy positively influenced performance, whereas depressive symptoms, burnout, and certain clinical working roles were linked to poorer outcomes. These findings support microlearning as an efficient and scalable model for clinical education. Future curriculum design should incorporate learner-specific adaptations to optimize outcomes and strengthen practical application. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-30T16:08:52Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-30T16:08:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
中文摘要 II 英文摘要 IV 目 次 VI 圖 次 VIII 表 次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 2 第三節 研究範圍 2 第四節 研究意義 2 第二章 文獻查證 3 第一節 務實性試驗的定義及與傳統試驗的差異 3 第二節 務實性試驗的優勢 6 第三節 務實性臨床試驗的種類與適用的情況 6 第四節 評估試驗的務實性程度 11 第五節 在臨床試驗中應用務實概念的實例 13 第六節 務實性臨床試驗可能存在的偏差與挑戰 15 第七節 線上微課程的效益 16 第八節 研究流程 18 第九節 名詞定義 19 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究設計 20 第二節 研究架構 21 第三節 研究對象 21 第四節 資料收集過程 21 第五節 研究工具 22 第六節 研究工具信效度檢定 29 第七節 資料處理與分析 34 第八節 研究對象的權益保護 35 第四章 研究結果 36 第一節 研究對象人口統計描述 37 第二節 務實性試驗知識、自我效能、憂鬱及職業倦怠 41 第三節 人口背景差異分析 44 第四節 臨床試驗知識與各量表之關係 73 第五節 本研究假設之驗證 73 第六節 逐步迴歸分析結果 79 第五章 討論 83 第一節 務實性臨床試驗知識測驗分析 83 第二節 線上微課程教學介入成效之探討 84 第三節 背景變項對知識測驗成效之影響 85 第四節 知識、學習效能與心理變項之關聯探討 86 第六章 結論與建議 89 第一節 結論 89 第二節 研究限制 90 第三節 建議 91 第七章 參考文獻 94 附錄一 研究問卷內容專家效度名單 101 附錄二 研究問卷 102 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 務實性臨床試驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 線上微課程 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臨床研究護理師 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 憂鬱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 職業倦怠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Clinical Research Nurses | en |
| dc.subject | Pragmatic Clinical Trials | en |
| dc.subject | Burnout | en |
| dc.subject | Depression | en |
| dc.subject | Self-Efficacy | en |
| dc.subject | Online Microlearning | en |
| dc.title | 線上微課程對提升護理師理解務實性臨床試驗之成效 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effectiveness of Online Microlearning in Enhancing Nurses' Understanding of Pragmatic Clinical Trial | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊志偉;陳書毓 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chih-Wei Yang;Shu-Yu Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 務實性臨床試驗,線上微課程,臨床研究護理師,自我效能,憂鬱,職業倦怠, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pragmatic Clinical Trials,Online Microlearning,Clinical Research Nurses,Self-Efficacy,Depression,Burnout, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 108 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502638 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-04 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 護理學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 護理學系所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.81 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。