請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/100184完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chun-Yen Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊晶晶 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Ching Yang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T16:46:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-25 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-24 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 張仁和、林以正、黃金蘭（2011）。 中文版「止觀覺察注意量表」之信效度分析。測驗學刊，58，235-260。https://doi.org/10.7108/pt.201104.0090
黃鳳英、吳昌衛、釋惠敏、釋果暉、趙一平、戴志達（2015）。「臺灣版五因素正念量表」之信效度分析。測驗學刊，62(3)。231-260。 蔡宇平、林映汝、陳志宏、謝昭賢、張俊彥（2017）應用功能性磁振造影探討觀看水景對腦區活化之反應。建築學報，101，133-142。https://doi.org/10.3966/101632122017090101008 American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Mindfulness. In APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved June 10, 2025, from https://dictionary.apa.org/mindfulness Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness Training as a Clinical Intervention: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg015 Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504 Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107313003 Baminiwatta, A., & Solangaarachchi, I. (2021). Trends and Developments in Mindfulness Research over 55 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications Indexed in Web of Science. Mindfulness, 12(9), 2099-2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01681-x Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077 Blanke, E. S., & Brose, A. (2017). Mindfulness in Daily Life: a Multidimensional Approach. Mindfulness, 8(3), 737-750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0651-4 Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol, 84(4), 822-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 Brown, K. W., M., R. R., & and Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for its Salutary Effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298 Burger, T., Potgieter, J. C., & Nell, W. (2024). Methods and Environmental Conditions Typical of Nature-Based Mindfulness Practice: A Scoping Review. Mindfulness, 15(7), 1621-1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02393-8 Chandrasiri, A., Collett, J., Fassbender, E., & De Foe, A. (2020). A virtual reality approach to mindfulness skills training. Virtual Reality, 24(1), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00380-2 Chen, A., & Tang, Y. (2024). Exploring the Facilitating Environment for Mindfulness Meditation: Establishing a Framework through Analysis of Means and Exploratory Factor Analysis. Mindfulness, 15(10), 2519-2535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02442-2 Chiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clin Psychol Rev, 31(3), 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.003 Choe, E. Y., Jorgensen, A., & Sheffield, D. (2020a). Does a natural environment enhance the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)? Examining the mental health and wellbeing, and nature connectedness benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 202, 103886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103886 Choe, E. Y., Jorgensen, A., & Sheffield, D. (2020b). Simulated natural environments bolster the effectiveness of a mindfulness programme: A comparison with a relaxation-based intervention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101382 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. NY: Harper and Row. Djernis, D., Lerstrup, I., Poulsen, D., Stigsdotter, U., Dahlgaard, J., & O’Toole, M. (2019). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nature-Based Mindfulness: Effects of Moving Mindfulness Training into an Outdoor Natural Setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), 3202. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173202 Hanley, A. W., Mehling, W. E., & Garland, E. L. (2017). Holding the body in mind: Interoceptive awareness, dispositional mindfulness and psychological well-being. J Psychosom Res, 99, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.05.014 Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 215-226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.007 Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001 Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., Böcking, S., Ravaja, N., Laarni, J., Saari, T., Gouveia, F., & Sacau, A. (2015). The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES). Journal of Media Psychology, 28, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000137 Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Res, 191(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006 Ivanovski, B., & Malhi, G. S. (2007). The psychological and neurophysiological concomitants of mindfulness forms of meditation. Acta Neuropsychiatr, 19(2), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5215.2007.00175.x Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3 Kabat-Zinn, J. (2015). Mindfulness. Mindfulness, 6(6), 1481-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0456-x Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, Restoration, and the Management of Mental Fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 480-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973106 Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1995). The Biophilia Hypothesis (Vol. 4). Island Press. Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind. Science, 330(6006), 932-932. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.1192439 Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. (1996). RESTORATIVE QUALITIES OF FAVORITE PLACES. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018 Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., Shapiro, S., Carmody, J., Abbey, S., & Devins, G. (2006). The toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445-1467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20326 Li, D., & Sullivan, W. C. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149-158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015 López-Martínez, F. (2017). Visual landscape preferences in Mediterranean areas and their socio-demographic influences. Ecological Engineering, 104, 205-215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.036 Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186 Lutz, A., Jha, A. P., Dunne, J. D., & Saron, C. D. (2015). Investigating the phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices from a neurocognitive perspective. Am Psychol, 70(7), 632-658. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039585 Lymeus, F., Lindberg, P., & Hartig, T. (2019). A natural meditation setting improves compliance with mindfulness training. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 98-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.008 Lymeus, F., Lundgren, T., & Hartig, T. (2017). Attentional Effort of Beginning Mindfulness Training Is Offset With Practice Directed Toward Images of Natural Scenery. Environment and Behavior, 49(5), 536-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516657390 Ma, J., Zhao, D., Xu, N., & Yang, J. (2023). The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality (VR) based mindfulness training on improvement mental-health in adults: A narrative systematic review. EXPLORE, 19(3), 310-318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2022.08.001 Macaulay, R., Johnson, K., Lee, K., & Williams, K. (2022). Comparing the effect of mindful and other engagement interventions in nature on attention restoration, nature connection, and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101813. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101813 Macaulay, R., Johnson, K., Lee, K., & Williams, K. (2024). Examining the facets of mindful engagement and mind wandering in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 94, 102253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102253 Macaulay, R., Lee, K., Johnson, K., & Williams, K. (2022). Mindful engagement, psychological restoration, and connection with nature in constrained nature experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104263 MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992-1000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010 Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale:Linking Individuals' Connection With Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748 Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Grandpierre, Z. (2019). Mindfulness in nature enhances connectedness and mood. Ecopsychology, 11(2), 81-91. Pasca, L., Aragonés, J. I., & Coello, M. T. (2017). An Analysis of the Connectedness to Nature Scale Based on Item Response Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 8 - 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01330 Peters, J. R., Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., & Smart, L. M. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness and rejection sensitivity: The critical role of nonjudgment. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 125-129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.029 Ray, T. N., Franz, S. A., Jarrett, N. L., & Pickett, S. M. (2021). Nature Enhanced Meditation: Effects on Mindfulness, Connectedness to Nature, and Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 53(8), 864-890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916520952452 Seabrook, E., Kelly, R., Foley, F., Theiler, S., Thomas, N., Wadley, G., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2020). Understanding How Virtual Reality Can Support Mindfulness Practice: Mixed Methods Study [Original Paper]. J Med Internet Res, 22(3), e16106. https://doi.org/10.2196/16106 Sevenant, M., & Antrop, M. (2010). The use of latent classes to identify individual differences in the importance of landscape dimensions for aesthetic preference. Land Use Policy, 27(3), 827-842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.002 Simón-Vicente, L., Rodríguez-Cano, S., Delgado-Benito, V., Ausín-Villaverde, V., & Cubo Delgado, E. (2024). Cybersickness. A systematic literature review of adverse effects related to virtual reality. Neurología, 39(8), 701-709. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2022.04.009 Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013). State Mindfulness Scale (SMS): Development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1286-1299. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034044 Tang, Y.-Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916 Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7 Van Gordon, W., Shonin, E., & Richardson, M. (2018). Mindfulness and Nature. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1655-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0883-6 White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482-493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004 Zhang, G., Yang, J., Wu, G., & Hu, X. (2021). Exploring the interactive influence on landscape preference from multiple visual attributes: Openness, richness, order, and depth. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 65, 127363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127363 Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/100184 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去研究證實以自然為基礎的正念干預，對個體的健康促進具有加乘效果。這些研究涵蓋各式自然環境、正念指導與測量方式，大多指出相較建成環境，自然環境擁有的明顯優勢。儘管景觀環境本身具有高度的多樣性，但目前相關文獻很少將其置於統一的分析框架中探討。此外，自然環境中的景觀特徵與恢復特性可能會對正念歷程產生影響。在此背景下，虛擬自然的發展提供了一種可操作的工具。有鑑於此，本研究選擇森林與水體兩類代表性環境進行比較，旨在探索正念練習者於不同環境中狀態正念與景觀偏好的差異，並進一步檢視兩者之間的關聯。隨機分配67位參與者到三種不同的環境（森林、水體、室內），透過全景投影教室呈現虛擬自然，並搭配引導語進行2次15分鐘正念練習。參與者於實驗開始前填寫特質正念量表與自然連結量表；練習結束後填寫狀態正念及偏好問項，並且進行5-10分鐘的簡短訪談。研究結果顯示環境條件對狀態正念及景觀偏好有影響，其中又以水體表現較佳；此外，狀態正念及其他正念機制（身體覺察、去中心化）皆與景觀偏好成正向關聯。本研究為自然環境與正念結合提供證據，同時指出水體環境對正念練習具有特殊效益，並近一步發現偏好作為狀態正念的潛在影響因子。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous research has shown that nature‑based mindfulness interventions can enhance health benefits. These studies, encompassing various natural settings, mindfulness guidance approaches, and measurement methods, generally indicate that natural environments offer clear advantages over built environments. However, the inherent diversity of landscape environments has rarely been examined within a single framework. Given that specific landscape features and restorative characteristics may influence mindfulness processes, this study compared two representative natural environments forests and waterscape to explore differences in state mindfulness and landscape preference among mindfulness practitioners. A total of 67 participants were randomly assigned to one of three environments (forest, water, indoor), presented through an immersive panoramic projection classroom. Each participant engaged in two 15-minute guided mindfulness sessions. Before the sessions, participants completed measures of trait mindfulness and nature connectedness; after the sessions, they filled out questionnaires on state mindfulness and landscape preference, followed by a brief 5–10 minute interview. The results showed that environmental conditions influenced both state mindfulness and landscape preference, with water environments leading to the highest scores. Moreover, state mindfulness and its key components (such as body awareness and decentering) were positively associated with landscape preference. This study provides empirical support for combining nature and mindfulness and suggests that water environments may offer unique benefits for mindfulness practice. It also highlights preference as a potential factor influencing mindfulness outcomes. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-24T16:46:38Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-24T16:46:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目次 iii 圖次 v 表次 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究緣起 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 正念 4 第二節 自然環境與正念的關係 9 第三節 小結 15 第三章 研究方法 16 第一節 研究架構與假設 16 第二節 研究變項 17 第三節 研究工具 23 第四節 資料分析方法 28 第四章 研究結果與討論 29 第一節 描述性統計 29 第二節 研究假設檢驗 32 第三節 主觀感受內容分析 36 第四節 結果討論 43 第五章 結論與建議 49 第一節 研究結論 49 第二節 研究限制與建議 50 參考文獻 53 附錄一 實驗問卷 59 附錄二 正念指導語文本 72 附錄三 知情同意書 74 附錄四 重要文獻摘錄 78 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 自然連結 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 虛擬自然 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 身體覺察 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 去中心化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非評判性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | decentering | en |
| dc.subject | non-judgment | en |
| dc.subject | nature relatedness | en |
| dc.subject | virtual nature | en |
| dc.subject | body awareness | en |
| dc.title | 森林、水體對景觀偏好與狀態正念之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Influences of Forest and Water Environment on Landscape Preference and State Mindfulness | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州;歐聖榮;張伯茹;吳昌衛 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yann-Jou Lin;Sheng-Jung Ou;Po-Ju Chang;Chang-Wei Wu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 身體覺察,去中心化,非評判性,自然連結,虛擬自然, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | body awareness,decentering,non-judgment,nature relatedness,virtual nature, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 85 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202504317 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-05-31 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.34 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。