http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102 2026-03-12T04:30:26Z http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5959 標題: 龍潭渴望園區空污事件行動者網絡之風險溝通分析; The risk communication analysis of actor network in the air pollution event of the Aspire-Park 作者: Jiun-Ren Lin; 林俊仁 摘要: 本文透過渴望園區空污事件的行動者網絡與風險溝通，探討渴望園區第三期的居民在面對空氣異味時，是如何面對與解決空污的問題，以及透過行動者網絡與風險溝通所產生的合作模式，藉由依循此模式的概念，在當前台灣的環境爭議中，是否能作為解決環境問題的另一種新途徑?並在空污事件中的發展脈絡裡，除了以行動者網絡的觀點作為分析事件的過程外，本文更整合風險溝通的角度，來探討在此事件中，每一時期的發展脈絡其所帶有的風險特質與問題為何，以及過程中各行動者之間的衝突與合作又是如何轉折，因此本文除了著重在各行動者間的轉譯過程外，更聚焦於此行動者群體間的風險溝通，並且在事件結束之後，討論未來將可能產生的風險衝突。; Through the actor network and risk communication of the Aspire-Park air pollution event, to discuss the third phase of the residents who are in the face of the air smells, and how do they confront and solve the problem of air pollution? As well as through this cooperation model of actor network and risk communication, and the concept followed by this model whether as an another new way of the solution to the current environmental problems of Taiwan? This research analyzes air pollution event in the context of Aspire-Park, not only stresses the Actor -Network Theory’s angle of the course of the event, but also integrates the risk communication’s viewpoints to explore each period of context in the event with what risk characteristics and problems are, and how to turn the conflicts and the cooperation of the various actors in the process, so this research also emphasizes the various actors in the translation process and focuses on the risk communication in this group of actors, and the research will discuss what risk conflicts may arise after the Aspire-Park event in the future. 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66249 標題: 黨內民主原則之理論與實務：德、日、台政黨規範比較研究; The Intra-Party Democratic Principle in Theory and Practice: A Comparative Study of the Political Parties Acts of Germany, Japan and Taiwan 作者: Chung-Chieh Yang; 楊仲傑 摘要: 黨內民主係政黨自主之重要原則，在分工逐漸細緻的現代民主秩序中，政黨已是穩定運作的民主國家裡不可或缺之角色。由於政黨之於民主政治的重要性，除了政黨間的互動應符合民主原則外，政黨內部的運作也必須按照如普遍性、公正性、公平性等基本門檻，進而對自身所為之決策與處分負責。本論文透過德國、日本、與中華民國三個政黨政治與憲政發展之案例，採文獻分析和比較分析兩種質化方法，並以上述三國案例分析得到的資料，設定政黨之憲法地位、政黨法制化程度、以及司法權審查範圍等比較項，嘗試歸納出黨內民主原則之操作模型。再藉由筆者所建立之操作模型，對我國現有之政黨規範與黨內民主運作為重新檢視，並嘗試提出法制面之修正建議，以期對我國政黨內部運作之民主化做出貢獻。; Intra-party democracy is one of important principle for party autonomy. In a modern democratic order with a gradual and meticulous division of labor, the roles of political parties have become indispensable in a democratic country for stable operations. Due to the importance of political parties as to democratic politics, in addition to the interaction between political parties, which should be in accordance with democratic principles, the internal operation of political parties must also comply with basic thresholds such as universality, impartiality, and equity. Henceforth, the political parties will be able to be responsible for their decisions and sanctions. This research is based on the cases of the political and constitutional development of the three political parties in Germany, Japan, and the Republic of China (Taiwan), respectively. Through the literature analysis and comparative analysis of the two qualitative methods, along with the data obtained from the analysis of the above three countries, this paper intends to establish the party's constitutional status, degree of legalization and judicial review scope, trying to summarize the operation model of intra-party democratic principles. Based on the operational model established in this research and taking it a step further, this paper re-examines the current existing party norms and the intra-party democracy operations in Taiwan, and tries to propose amendments to the legal system in order to contribute to the democratization of the internal operation of Taiwan’s political parties. 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47901 標題: 點對點服務業者著作權責任問題之研究; A Study on the Peer to Peer Service Providers' Liability for Copyright Infringement 作者: Jian-Shiun Chen; 陳建勳 摘要: 論文中文摘要 隨著Web2.0時代的來臨，網路科技的發展日新月異，使著作被廣泛利用，也造成了前所未見的大量侵權利用行為，參閱國內外司法判決，關於近來網路著作權之侵害，主要乃在點對點傳輸檔案相關之侵權問題（Peer-to-Peer，P2P）。 我國於2001年台南地檢署因MP3檔案而搜索成大校園事件之後，國人對於網路著作權開始明顯關注。根據RIT及警政署保智大隊的調查，顯示我國網路著作權之侵害日益嚴重。 面對著作遭受侵害，世界各國著作權人對網路服務業者提起訴訟的案例日益增加，由於網路服務業者本身並未從事侵權行為，當網路服務使用者侵害他人權益時，網路服務業者對於其使用者是否應負責一直是個重要的研究問題。美國 1998年通過之千禧年著作權法最初的制定即是預防這類網路著作權侵害問題，以提供安全港條款方式，讓符合特定條件的網路服務業者得以主張免責保護，並提供配合著作權人阻止侵權行為的誘因。 我國為因應P2P侵害著作權問題，參考美國千禧年著作權法與美國Grokster案最高法院判決，於著作權法新增P2P條款及「網路服務提供者之民事免責事由」專章，以處理網路服務業者的侵權與責任問題。 然而P2P服務業者是否應為使用者行為負侵害責任？P2P服務業者在我國與美國法上究竟負有何種責任？其是否適用我國網路服務業者免責事由阻卻其罪責？由於我國司法實務判決於ezpeer與kuro兩案見解迥異，且P2P是否適用美國千禧年著作權法免責亦是美國食物上之重要爭議，在在顯示相關問題仍待解決。 本文將就相關問題進行比較法上之研究，以美國與我國之P2P服務業者相關法例為核心，包括介紹美國之著作權侵權責任、美國與我國法院具代表性案例之相關爭議，並整理歸納比較我國與美國P2P服務業者法規範之異同；且對於「網路服務提供者之民事免責事由」進一步分析立法之利弊得失。本文的目的即在於釐清P2P服務業者的相關責任，並對我國最新修法提供評論與建議。; Abstract With the developing of technology and the Web 2.0 era, intellectual works has been abused widely, which also creates numerous infringement behaviors. Refer to both domestic and oversea judgments about internet copyright infringements, the Peer-to-Peer(P2P) file transformation appears to be the main infringement cause. After Tainan District Prosecutors Office conducted investigated in the campus of National Cheng Kung University in 2001, people started to pay attention on internet copyrights. According to the survey done by RIT and Intellectual Property Rights Police Team, it seems that the situation of internet copyright infringements is getting worse. Noticing the situation of infringements, copyright owners all over the world have gradually taken proceedings against internet service providers. However, internet service providers are not really engaged in infringements. Therefore, It remains an open question about the responsibilities of internet service providers on infringements. The Digital Millenium Copyright Act passed in America in 1998 aimed exactly on preventing this sort of problems about infringements and providing the safe harbor provision for qualified internet service providers to claim their liability disclaimer and assist copyright owners in preventing infringements. Refer to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act passed in America and domestic court judgments, domestic copyright laws finally added the P2P provision and the “Copyright Law ISP Industry Exemption Revision” for dealing with the infringement and responsibility problems about internet service providers. Should P2P service providers be responsible for user behavior infringements? What responsibility do P2P service providers take according to domestic and American laws? Can they apply the liability disclaimer of domestic internet service providers to avoid guilt? The judgments on ezpeer and kuro provide two different versions about infringements. It seems that the related problems are necessary to solve. This study aims to compare domestic and American laws on the related rules about P2P service providers. In the study we presented the introduction about responsibilities of copyright infringements in American, the typical cases about domestic and American copyright infringements, and the differences and similarities between domestic and American provisions on P2P service providers. We further analyzed the legislation about the “Copyright Law ISP Industry Exemption Revision” on both sides. The purpose of this study is to clarify the related responsibilities of P2P service providers and provide some suggestions for revising domestic copyright laws. 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27490 標題: 鴻海科技集團的多角化策略與經營績效; The Diversification Strategy and Performance of Foxconn Technology Group 作者: Siao-Ping Lin; 林筱萍 摘要: 在面臨國際化、自由化浪潮的衝擊之下，隨著經濟結構、社會結構變遷，集團企業在台灣經濟成長中的角色日益重要。企業在追求成長的過程中，須不斷地擴充企業的規模，而多角化的經營方式，已成為企業作為擴張經營範圍與規模的方式之一，然多角化之經營策略，雖具備分散經營風險、擴張經營範圍、可能達到經濟規模效益之優勢，但未經慎思而單憑個人之志所選擇的進入領域，卻可能拖垮企業主業之經營成效。 近年來台灣的多角化企業中，就屬電子代工製造業的【鴻海科技集團】表現最為亮眼，鴻海集團的產業多角化跨足電腦、通訊、消費性電子、零售通路、車用電子以及數位內容等，其躍進式的成長，打造出富可敵國的規模，因此希望透過本研究，探索鴻海集團如何執行繁複的多角化經營策略，並成功的提升本身的經營績效。 研究後發現鴻海的多角化策略有三項特點，一是著重研發與擅用專利，二為獨特的CMMS與逆向整合，三是善用分割與併購策略。此外，鴻海的多角化策略也確實對整體經營績效有正面幫助。 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z