請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92420
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡育彰 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Chang Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾繁茵 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Fan-Yin Tseng | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-22T16:25:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-23 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-22 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-10-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Alexandersson, E., Fraysse, L., Sjövall-Larsen, S., Gustavsson, S., Fellert, M., Karlsson, M., Johanson, U., & Kjellbom, P. (2005). Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins. Plant molecular biology, 59, 469-484.
Anyaoha, C. O., Fofana, M., Gracen, V., Tongoona, P., & Mande, S. (2019). Introgression of Two Drought QTLs into FUNAABOR-2 Early Generation Backcross Progenies Under Drought Stress at Reproductive Stage. Rice Science, 26(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.04.006 Asíns, M. J. (2002). Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 121(4), 281-291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.730285.x Barnabás, B., Jäger, K., & Fehér, A. (2008). The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell & Environment, 31(1), 11-38. Bates, L., Waldren, R. a., & Teare, I. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil, 39, 205-207. Bernier, J., Kumar, A., Ramaiah, V., Spaner, D., & Atlin, G. (2007). A Large-Effect QTL for Grain Yield under Reproductive-Stage Drought Stress in Upland Rice. Crop Science, 47(2), 507-516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0495 Boursiac, Y., Boudet, J., Postaire, O., Luu, D. T., Tournaire‐Roux, C., & Maurel, C. (2008). Stimulus‐induced downregulation of root water transport involves reactive oxygen species‐activated cell signalling and plasma membrane intrinsic protein internalization. The Plant Journal, 56(2), 207-218. Bramley, H., Turner, N. C., & Siddique, K. H. (2013). Water use efficiency. Genomics and Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops: Vol. 2 Target Traits, 225-268. Bramley, H., Turner, N. C., Turner, D. W., & Tyerman, S. D. (2009). Roles of morphology, anatomy, and aquaporins in determining contrasting hydraulic behavior of roots. Plant physiology, 150(1), 348-364. Cha-um, S., Rai, V., & Takabe, T. (2019). Proline, glycinebetaine, and trehalose uptake and inter-organ transport in plants under stress. Osmoprotectant-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives, 201-223. Clark, L. J., Price, A. H., Steele, K. A., & Whalley, W. R. (2008). Evidence from near-isogenic lines that root penetration increases with root diameter and bending stiffness in rice. Functional Plant Biology, 35(11), 1163-1171. Comas, L. H., Becker, S. R., Cruz, V. M. V., Byrne, P. F., & Dierig, D. A. (2013). Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in plant science, 4, 442. Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., & Farquhar, G. D. (2002). Improving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield. Crop Science, 42(1), 122-131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1220 de Ollas, C., & Dodd, I. C. (2016). Physiological impacts of ABA–JA interactions under water-limitation. Plant molecular biology, 91, 641-650. Deblonde, P. M. K., Haverkort, A. J., & Ledent, J. F. (1999). Responses of early and late potato cultivars to moderate drought conditions: agronomic parameters and carbon isotope discrimination. European Journal of Agronomy, 11(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00019-2 Ding, L., Gao, C., Li, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, Y., Xu, G., Shen, Q., Kaldenhoff, R., Kai, L., & Guo, S. (2015). The enhanced drought tolerance of rice plants under ammonium is related to aquaporin (AQP). Plant Science, 234, 14-21. Dixit, S., Grondin, A., Lee, C.-R., Henry, A., Olds, T.-M., & Kumar, A. (2015). Understanding rice adaptation to varying agro-ecosystems: trait interactions and quantitative trait loci. BMC genetics, 16, 1-14. Dixit, S., Huang, B. E., Sta Cruz, M. T., Maturan, P. T., Ontoy, J. C. E., & Kumar, A. (2014). QTLs for Tolerance of Drought and Breeding for Tolerance of Abiotic and Biotic Stress: An Integrated Approach. PLOS ONE, 9(10), e109574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109574 Dixit, S., Kumar Biswal, A., Min, A., Henry, A., Oane, R. H., Raorane, M. L., Longkumer, T., Pabuayon, I. M., Mutte, S. K., & Vardarajan, A. R. (2015). Action of multiple intra-QTL genes concerted around a co-localized transcription factor underpins a large effect QTL. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 15183. Dixit, S., Swamy, B. P. M., Vikram, P., Ahmed, H. U., Sta Cruz, M. T., Amante, M., Atri, D., Leung, H., & Kumar, A. (2012). Fine mapping of QTLs for rice grain yield under drought reveals sub-QTLs conferring a response to variable drought severities. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 125(1), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1823-9 Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989). Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual review of plant biology, 40(1), 503-537. Fetter, K., Van Wilder, V., Moshelion, M., & Chaumont, F. (2004). Interactions between plasma membrane aquaporins modulate their water channel activity. The Plant Cell, 16(1), 215-228. Gao, Q., Sun, J., Tong, H., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Ma, D., & Chen, W. (2018). Evaluation of rice drought stress response using carbon isotope discrimination. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 132, 80-88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.08.030 Ghimire, K. H., Quiatchon, L. A., Vikram, P., Swamy, B. P. M., Dixit, S., Ahmed, H., Hernandez, J. E., Borromeo, T. H., & Kumar, A. (2012). Identification and mapping of a QTL (qDTY1.1) with a consistent effect on grain yield under drought. Field Crops Research, 131, 88-96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.028 Gonen, T., & Walz, T. (2006). The structure of aquaporins. Quarterly reviews of biophysics, 39(4), 361-396. Grondin, A., Dixit, S., Torres, R., Venkateshwarlu, C., Rogers, E., Mitchell-Olds, T., Benfey, P. N., Kumar, A., & Henry, A. (2018). Physiological mechanisms contributing to the QTL qDTY3.2 effects on improved performance of rice Moroberekan x Swarna BC2F3:4 lines under drought. Rice, 11(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-018-0234-1 Gulías, J., Seddaiu, G., Cifre, J., Salis, M., & Ledda, L. (2012). Leaf and plant water use efficiency in cocksfoot and tall fescue accessions under differing soil water availability. Crop Science, 52(5), 2321-2331. Hao, Z., Singh, V. P., & Xia, Y. (2018). Seasonal drought prediction: advances, challenges, and future prospects. Reviews of Geophysics, 56(1), 108-141. Henry, A., Dixit, S., Mandal, N. P., Anantha, M., Torres, R., & Kumar, A. (2014). Grain yield and physiological traits of rice lines with the drought yield QTL qDTY12. 1 showed different responses to drought and soil characteristics in upland environments. Functional Plant Biology, 41(11), 1066-1077. Henry, A., Stuart-Williams, H., Dixit, S., Kumar, A., & Farquhar, G. (2019). Stomatal conductance responses to evaporative demand conferred by rice drought-yield quantitative trait locus qDTY12. 1. Functional Plant Biology, 46(7), 660-669. Hetherington, A. M., & Woodward, F. I. (2003). The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature, 424(6951), 901-908. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01843 Hidayati, N., & Anas, I. (2016). Photosynthesis and transpiration rates of rice cultivated under the system of rice intensification and the effects on growth and yield. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 23(2), 67-72. Hussain, H. A., Hussain, S., Khaliq, A., Ashraf, U., Anjum, S. A., Men, S., & Wang, L. (2018). Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities. Frontiers in plant science, 9, 393. Ishikawa, F., Suga, S., Uemura, T., Sato, M. H., & Maeshima, M. (2005). Novel type aquaporin SIPs are mainly localized to the ER membrane and show cell-specific expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Letters, 579(25), 5814-5820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.076 Kano, M., Inukai, Y., Kitano, H., & Yamauchi, A. (2011). Root plasticity as the key root trait for adaptation to various intensities of drought stress in rice. Plant and soil, 342(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0675-9 Karnatam, K. S., Jaganathan, D., & Dilip, K. R. (2020). Shortlisting putative candidate genes underlying qDTY1. 1, a major effect drought tolerant QTL in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 11(03), 916-924. Kim, Y., Chung, Y. S., Lee, E., Tripathi, P., Heo, S., & Kim, K.-H. (2020). Root response to drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). International journal of molecular sciences, 21(4), 1513. Kumar, A., Basu, S., Ramegowda, V., & Pereira, A. (2017). Mechanisms of drought tolerance in rice. Burleigh Dodds Sci. Publ. Ltd, 131-163. Kumar, A., Bernier, J., Verulkar, S., Lafitte, H. R., & Atlin, G. N. (2008). Breeding for drought tolerance: Direct selection for yield, response to selection and use of drought-tolerant donors in upland and lowland-adapted populations. Field Crops Research, 107(3), 221-231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.02.007 Kurowska, M. M., Wiecha, K., Gajek, K., & Szarejko, I. (2019). Drought stress and re-watering affect the abundance of TIP aquaporin transcripts in barley. PLOS ONE, 14(12), e0226423. Liang, X., Zhang, L., Natarajan, S. K., & Becker, D. F. (2013). Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxidants & redox signaling, 19(9), 998-1011. Luu, D. T., & Maurel, C. (2005). Aquaporins in a challenging environment: molecular gears for adjusting plant water status. Plant, Cell & Environment, 28(1), 85-96. Mishra, K. K., Vikram, P., Yadaw, R. B., Swamy, B., Dixit, S., Cruz, M. T. S., Maturan, P., Marker, S., & Kumar, A. (2013). qDTY12. 1: a locus with a consistent effect on grain yield under drought in rice. BMC genetics, 14(1), 1-10. Mishra, S. S., & Panda, D. (2017). Leaf traits and antioxidant defense for drought tolerance during early growth stage in some popular traditional rice landraces from Koraput, India. Rice Science, 24(4), 207-217. Miura, K., Okamoto, H., Okuma, E., Shiba, H., Kamada, H., Hasegawa, P. M., & Murata, Y. (2013). SIZ1 deficiency causes reduced stomatal aperture and enhanced drought tolerance via controlling salicylic acid‐induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species in A rabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 73(1), 91-104. Mohd Ikmal, A., Noraziyah, A. A. S., & Wickneswari, R. (2021). Incorporating Drought and Submergence Tolerance QTL in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)—The Effects under Reproductive Stage Drought and Vegetative Stage Submergence Stresses. Plants, 10(2), 225. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/2/225 Mohd Ikmal, A., Nurasyikin, Z., Tuan Nur Aqlili Riana, T. A., Puteri Dinie Ellina, Z., Wickneswari, R., & Noraziyah, A. A. S. (2019). Drought Yield QTL (qDTY) with Consistent Effects on Morphological and Agronomical Traits of Two Populations of New Rice (Oryza sativa) Lines. Plants, 8(6), 186. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/8/6/186 Mori, I. C., Murata, Y., Yang, Y., Munemasa, S., Wang, Y.-F., Andreoli, S., Tiriac, H., Alonso, J. M., Harper, J. F., & Ecker, J. R. (2006). CDPKs CPK6 and CPK3 function in ABA regulation of guard cell S-type anion-and Ca2+-permeable channels and stomatal closure. PLoS biology, 4(10), e327. Mukherjee, S., & Choudhuri, M. (1983). Implications of water stress‐induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiologia plantarum, 58(2), 166-170. Oo, K. S., Krishnan, S. G., Vinod, K. K., Dhawan, G., Dwivedi, P., Kumar, P., Bhowmick, P. K., Pal, M., Chinnuswamy, V., Nagarajan, M., Bollinedi, H., Ellur, R. K., & Singh, A. K. (2021). Molecular Breeding for Improving Productivity of Oryza sativa L. cv. Pusa 44 under Reproductive Stage Drought Stress through Introgression of a Major QTL, qDTY12.1. Genes, 12(7), 967. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/7/967 Oyanagi, A. (1994). Gravitropic response growth angle and vertical distribution of roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant and soil, 165, 323-326. Pan, X., Welti, R., & Wang, X. (2010). Quantitative analysis of major plant hormones in crude plant extracts by high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Nature protocols, 5(6), 986-992. Pantuwan, G., Fukai, S., Cooper, M., Rajatasereekul, S., & O’toole, J. (2002). Yield response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to drought under rainfed lowlands: 2. Selection of drought resistant genotypes. Field Crops Research, 73(2-3), 169-180. Parent, B., Hachez, C., Redondo, E., Simonneau, T., Chaumont, F., & Tardieu, F. (2009). Drought and abscisic acid effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: a trans-scale approach. Plant physiology, 149(4), 2000-2012. Rae, L., Lao, N. T., & Kavanagh, T. A. (2011). Regulation of multiple aquaporin genes in Arabidopsis by a pair of recently duplicated DREB transcription factors. Planta, 234, 429-444. Raorane, M. L., Pabuayon, I. M., Varadarajan, A. R., Mutte, S. K., Kumar, A., Treumann, A., & Kohli, A. (2015). Proteomic insights into the role of the large-effect QTL qDTY12.1for rice yield under drought. Molecular Breeding, 35(6), 139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0321-6 Richards, R., Rebetzke, G., Condon, A., & Van Herwaarden, A. (2002). Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Science, 42(1), 111-121. Riemann, M., Dhakarey, R., Hazman, M., Miro, B., Kohli, A., & Nick, P. (2015). Exploring jasmonates in the hormonal network of drought and salinity responses. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 1077. Rowe, J. H., Topping, J. F., Liu, J., & Lindsey, K. (2016). Abscisic acid regulates root growth under osmotic stress conditions via an interacting hormonal network with cytokinin, ethylene and auxin. New Phytologist, 211(1), 225-239. Royo, C., Villegas, D., del Moral, L. F. G., iacute, Elhani, S., Aparicio, N., Rharrabti, Y., & Araus, J. L. (2002). Comparative performance of carbon isotope discrimination and canopy temperature depression as predictors of genotype differences in durum wheat yield in Spain. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(5), 561-569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01016 Saikumar, S., Gouda, P. K., Saiharini, A., Varma, C. M. K., Vineesha, O., Padmavathi, G., & Shenoy, V. V. (2014). Major QTL for enhancing rice grain yield under lowland reproductive drought stress identified using an O. sativa/O. glaberrima introgression line. Field Crops Research, 163, 119-131. Sakurai, J., Ishikawa, F., Yamaguchi, T., Uemura, M., & Maeshima, M. (2005). Identification of 33 Rice Aquaporin Genes and Analysis of Their Expression and Function. Plant and Cell Physiology, 46(9), 1568-1577. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pci172 Sanchez, J., Kaur, P. P., Pabuayon, I. C. M., Karampudi, N. B. R., Kitazumi, A., Sandhu, N., Catolos, M., Kumar, A., & de los Reyes, B. G. (2022). DECUSSATE network with flowering genes explains the variable effects of qDTY12.1 to rice yield under drought across genetic backgrounds. The Plant Genome, 15(1), e20168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20168 Sandhu, N., Dixit, S., Swamy, B. P. M., Raman, A., Kumar, S., Singh, S. P., Yadaw, R. B., Singh, O. N., Reddy, J. N., Anandan, A., Yadav, S., Venkataeshwarllu, C., Henry, A., Verulkar, S., Mandal, N. P., Ram, T., Badri, J., Vikram, P., & Kumar, A. (2019). Marker Assisted Breeding to Develop Multiple Stress Tolerant Varieties for Flood and Drought Prone Areas. Rice, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-019-0269-y Scartazza, A., Lauteri, M., Guido, M. C., & Brugnoli, E. (1998). Carbon isotope discrimination in leaf and stem sugars, water-use efficiency and mesophyll conductance during different developmental stages in rice subjected to drought. Functional Plant Biology, 25(4), 489-498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1071/PP98017 Seethepalli, A., Guo, H., Liu, X., Griffiths, M., Almtarfi, H., Li, Z., Liu, S., Zare, A., Fritschi, F. B., Blancaflor, E. B., Ma, X.-F., & York, L. M. (2020). RhizoVision Crown: An Integrated Hardware and Software Platform for Root Crown Phenotyping. Plant Phenomics, 2020. https://doi.org/doi:10.34133/2020/3074916 Sharma, M., Gupta, S. K., Majumder, B., Maurya, V. K., Deeba, F., Alam, A., & Pandey, V. (2017). Salicylic acid mediated growth, physiological and proteomic responses in two wheat varieties under drought stress. Journal of proteomics, 163, 28-51. Sharp, R. E. (2002). Interaction with ethylene: changing views on the role of abscisic acid in root and shoot growth responses to water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00798.x Shivaraj, S. M., Sharma, Y., Chaudhary, J., Rajora, N., Sharma, S., Thakral, V., Ram, H., Sonah, H., Singla-Pareek, S. L., Sharma, T. R., & Deshmukh, R. (2021). Dynamic role of aquaporin transport system under drought stress in plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 184, 104367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104367 Smirnoff, N., & Cumbes, Q. J. (1989). Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes. Phytochemistry, 28(4), 1057-1060. Sonah, H., Deshmukh, R. K., Labbé, C., & Bélanger, R. R. (2017). Analysis of aquaporins in Brassicaceae species reveals high-level of conservation and dynamic role against biotic and abiotic stress in canola. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 2771. Steudle, E. (2000). Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit. Journal of experimental botany, 51(350), 1531-1542. Tron, S., Bodner, G., Laio, F., Ridolfi, L., & Leitner, D. (2015). Can diversity in root architecture explain plant water use efficiency? A modeling study. Ecological Modelling, 312, 200-210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.028 Ueda, A., Shi, W., Shimada, T., Miyake, H., & Takabe, T. (2008). Altered expression of barley proline transporter causes different growth responses in Arabidopsis. Planta, 227, 277-286. Uga, Y., Sugimoto, K., Ogawa, S., Rane, J., Ishitani, M., Hara, N., Kitomi, Y., Inukai, Y., Ono, K., & Kanno, N. (2013). Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nature genetics, 45(9), 1097-1102. Venuprasad, R., Dalid, C., Del Valle, M., Zhao, D., Espiritu, M., Sta Cruz, M., Amante, M., Kumar, A., & Atlin, G. (2009). Identification and characterization of large-effect quantitative trait loci for grain yield under lowland drought stress in rice using bulk-segregant analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120, 177-190. Vikram, P., Swamy, B. M., Dixit, S., Ahmed, H. U., Teresa Sta Cruz, M., Singh, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2011). qDTY 1.1, a major QTL for rice grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress with a consistent effect in multiple elite genetic backgrounds. BMC genetics, 12, 1-15. Wang, L.-L., Chen, A.-P., Zhong, N.-Q., Liu, N., Wu, X.-M., Wang, F., Yang, C.-L., Romero, M. F., & Xia, G.-X. (2014). The Thellungiella salsuginea tonoplast aquaporin TsTIP1; 2 functions in protection against multiple abiotic stresses. Plant and Cell Physiology, 55(1), 148-161. Wang, X., Li, Q., Xie, J., Huang, M., Cai, J., Zhou, Q., Dai, T., & Jiang, D. (2021). Abscisic acid and jasmonic acid are involved in drought priming-induced tolerance to drought in wheat. The Crop Journal, 9(1), 120-132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.06.002 Wilkinson, S., Kudoyarova, G. R., Veselov, D. S., Arkhipova, T. N., & Davies, W. J. (2012). Plant hormone interactions: innovative targets for crop breeding and management. Journal of experimental botany, 63(9), 3499-3509. Yadaw, R. B., Dixit, S., Raman, A., Mishra, K. K., Vikram, P., Swamy, B. P. M., Cruz, M. T. S., Maturan, P. T., Pandey, M., & Kumar, A. (2013). A QTL for high grain yield under lowland drought in the background of popular rice variety Sabitri from Nepal. Field Crops Research, 144, 281-287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.019 Yamazaki, K., Morita, S., & Kawata, S.-i. (1981). Correlations between the growth angles of crown roots and their diameters in rice plants. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 50(4), 452-456. Yoo, C. Y., Pence, H. E., Jin, J. B., Miura, K., Gosney, M. J., Hasegawa, P. M., & Mickelbart, M. V. (2010). The Arabidopsis GTL1 Transcription Factor Regulates Water Use Efficiency and Drought Tolerance by Modulating Stomatal Density via Transrepression of SDD1 The Plant Cell, 22(12), 4128-4141. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.078691 Yoshida, S. (1976). Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Int Rice Res Ins, Philippines, 23, 61-66. Zhang, J., Jia, W., Yang, J., & Ismail, A. M. (2006). Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crops Research, 97(1), 111-119. Zhang, J., Zhang, S., Cheng, M., Jiang, H., Zhang, X., Peng, C., Lu, X., Zhang, M., & Jin, J. (2018). Effect of Drought on Agronomic Traits of Rice and Wheat: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 839. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/839 Zwack, P. J., & Rashotte, A. M. (2015). Interactions between cytokinin signalling and abiotic stress responses. Journal of experimental botany, 66(16), 4863-4871. 林國清. (2004). 水稻新品種台南 11 號之育成. 台南區農業改良場研究彙報, 45:1-25. 陳素娥. (1996). 水稻新品種臺稉 14 號特性及栽培管理要點. 桃園區農業專訊(17), 6-8. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92420 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 全球氣候變遷導致乾旱事件頻繁,對許多重要糧食作物的生長及產量帶來嚴重威脅。如何提高水稻的水分利用效率,並能夠維持足夠的水稻產量則為重要之議題。過去許多與乾旱產量相關的數量性狀基因座 (qDTYs) 之研究顯示,在乾旱情況下,能夠有一定的產量維持。本研究將分析qDTY1.1、qDTY2.1、qDTY3.1、qDTY3.2、qDTY12.1對台灣栽培稻台南11號 (TN11) 以及台稉14號 (TK14) 水分利用效率之影響。TN11之導入系TN11-qDTY1.1/2.1/3.1與TN11-qDTY3.2和TN11-qDTY12.1相較於TN11有較低的蒸散量, TN11-qDTY1.1/2.1/3.1與TN11-qDTY3.2有更多的細根體積分佈表現,另qDTY12.1在導入TN11及TK14結果顯示在乾旱下有較好的氣孔導度維持,本研究也利用轉錄體定序 (RNA-seq) 進行全基因體表現分析,發現qDTY12.1區段的基因以及水通道蛋白相關基因,在TN11-qDTY12.1中的表現量相對親本TN11高,而TK14- qDTY12.1則相對親本TK14低。本研究結果顯示qDTYs的導入會影響植株的性狀表現以及提高水分利用效率,此外,在不同的親本中生理性狀和基因表現量也有差異性,表示qDTY的導入對植物生長的影響程度會受親本的不同而有差異。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Global climate change has led to frequent drought events, posing a serious threat to the growth and yield of many important food crops. How to improve the water use efficiency of rice and maintain sufficient rice yields is an important issue. Previous research on quantitative trait loci (qDTYs) related to drought tolerance has shown that rice can maintain a certain level of yield even under drought conditions. This study analyzes the impact of qDTY1.1, qDTY2.1, qDTY3.1, qDTY3.2, and qDTY12.1 on the water use efficiency of two Taiwanese cultivated rice varieties, Tainan 11 (TN11) and Taiken 14 (TK14). The introgression lines TN11-qDTY1.1/2.1/3.1, TN11-qDTY3.2, and TN11-qDTY12.1 showed lower transpiration rates compared to TN11. TN11-qDTY1.1/2.1/3.1 and TN11-qDTY3.2 exhibited greater distribution of fine root volume. Additionally, qDTY12.1, when introgressed into TN11 and TK14, demonstrated better stomatal conductance maintenance under drought conditions. The transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis showed genes within the qDTY12.1 region and genes related to aquaporins exhibited higher expression levels in TN11-qDTY12.1 compared to TN11, whereas in TK14-qDTY12.1, these gene expression levels were relatively lower compared to TK14.The results of this study indicate that the introduction of qDTYs affects plant trait performance and enhances water use efficiency. Furthermore, there are variations in physiological traits and gene expression levels among different parents, suggesting that the impact of qDTY introgression on plant growth varies also depending on the genetic background. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-22T16:25:32Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-22T16:25:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
摘要 II Abstract III 縮寫字對照表 IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 XI 附表目錄 XII 第一章 前人研究 1 1.1 乾旱產量相關數量基因座 1 1.2 乾旱逆境對植物外表型之影響 4 1.3水分利用效率 5 1.4植物荷爾蒙於乾旱逆境之反應 7 1.5水通道蛋白 8 第二章 材料方法 10 2.1試驗之水稻生長條件 10 2.1.1 試驗材料 10 2.1.2 田間試驗 (Table 2) 10 2.1.3生長箱試驗 11 2.1.4 蒸散量試驗 11 2.1.5 產量構成要素分析 12 2.2 氣孔導度測量 12 2.3 葉片氣孔型態觀察 12 2.4 熱影像溫度測定 13 2.5 穩定性碳同位素測定 13 2.6 根系體積與角度量測 14 2.7 水稻外施處理條件 14 2.8 脯胺酸含量分析 15 2.9 相對含水量分析 15 2.10 荷爾蒙液相層析質譜分析LC/MS/MS 16 2.11 RNA萃取 17 2.12轉錄體定序資料分析 17 2.13 RT-PCR 18 2.14 Real time qPCR 19 2.15 統計分析方法 19 第三章 結果 20 3.1 qDTY導入對植株之水分利用效率影響 20 3.2 qDTY導入對植株於乾旱逆境下滲透物質之表現 21 3.3 qDTY導入對植株之植物荷爾蒙分析 23 3.4 qDTY導入對植株於田間地上部之生長分析 26 3.5 qDTY導入對植株田間根系之生長分析 28 3.6 qDTY導入對植株於田間之產量構成要素分析 30 3.7 相關性分析 31 3.8 qDTY12.1導入系於乾旱逆境下差異表現基因之基因功能分析 32 3.9 qDTY12.1導入系差異表現基因之KEGG生物途徑分析 35 3.10 qDTY12.1導入區域相關基因之表現 36 3.11 qDTY12.1導入對水通道蛋白相關基因之表現 37 3.12 qDTY12.1導入對非生物逆境相關基因之表現 38 第四章 討論 39 4.1 qDTYs導入TN11對水分利用效率之影響 39 4.2 qDTYs導入TN11於乾旱逆境之生理功能探討 40 4.3 qDTYs導入TN11於乾旱逆境根系之表現 42 4.4 qDTYs導入TN11對滲透調節物質之影響 44 4.5 qDTYs導入TN11於乾旱逆境荷爾蒙含量之表現 45 4.6 qDTY12.1導入不同親本對生理表現之影響 46 4.7 qDTY12.1導入不同親本對基因表現之影響 47 第五章 結論 49 參考文獻 50 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 評估耐旱相關 QTL 導入水稻台南 11 及台稉14對生理、水分利用之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Physiological and Molecular Characterization of the Drought Tolerance-Related QTL Introgression lines of Tainan 11 and Taiken 14 | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許奕婷;洪傳揚;林香君 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yi-Ting Xu;Chwan-Yang Hong;Hsiang-Chun Lin | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 水稻,qDTY,乾旱,根系,轉錄體分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Oryza sativa,qDTY,drought stress,root structure,RNA-seq, | en |
dc.relation.page | 112 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304295 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-10-06 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農藝學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 農藝學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.84 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。