請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8957
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林克忠(Keh-Chung Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiang-Ting Li | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李湘婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:05:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-15 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:05:02Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Arai, T., Ohi, H., Sasaki, H., Nobuto, H., & Tanaka, K. (1997). Hemispatial sunglasses: effect on unilateral spatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(2), 230-232.
Azouvi, P., Olivier, S., de Montety, G., Samuel, C., Louis-Dreyfus, A., & Tesio, L. (2003). Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: Study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(1), 51-57. Barrett, A. M., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Edwards, E., Heilman, K. M., Hillis, A. E., et al. (2006). Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for neglect and related disorders: moving from bench to bedside in stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1223-1236. Beis, J. M., Andre, J. M., Baumgarten, A., & Challier, B. (1999). Eye patching in unilateral spatial neglect: efficacy of two methods. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(1), 71-76. Bisiach, E., Perani, D., Vallar, G., & Berti, A. (1986). Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia, 24(6), 759-767. Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987). Assessment of strength deficits in eight paretic upper extremity muscle groups of stroke patients with hemiplegia. Physical Therapy, 67(4), 522-525. Brooks, V. B., & Watts, S. L. (1988). Adaptive programming of arm movements. J Mot Behav, 20(2), 117-132. Buxbaum, L. J., Ferraro, M. K., Veramonti, T., Farne, A., Whyte, J., Ladavas, E., et al. (2004). Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology, 62(5), 749-756. Chen Sea, M. J., Henderson, A., & Cermak, S. A. (1993). Patterns of visual spatial inattention and their functional significance in stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(4), 355-360. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J. :: L. Erlbaum Associates. Coulthard, E., Parton, A., & Husain, M. (2006). Action control in visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2717-2733. Denes, G., Semenza, C., Stoppa, E., & Lis, A. (1982). Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain, 105 (Pt 3), 543-552. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. Dromerick, A. W., Edwards, D. F., & Hahn, M. (2000). Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke, 31(12), 2984-2988. Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., & Nelson, S. G. (1983). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Physical Therapy, 63(10), 1606-1610. Eimer, M., Van Velzen, J., Gherri, E., & Press, C. (2006). Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing. Brain Research, 1105(1), 7-19. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, 5(7), 1688-1703. Fong, K. N., Chan, M. K., Ng, P. P., Tsang, M. H., Chow, K. K., Lau, C. W., et al. (2007). The effect of voluntary trunk rotation and half-field eye-patching for patients with unilateral neglect in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21(8), 729-741. Freeman, E. (2001). Unilateral spatial neglect: new treatment approaches with potential application to occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(4), 401-408. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(1), 13-31. Gialanella, B. (1992). Anosognosia and extrapersonal neglect as predictors of functional recovery following right hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2(3), 169. Gladstone, D. J., Danells, C. J., & Black, S. E. (2002). The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16(3), 232-240. Grotta, J. C., Noser, E. A., Ro, T., Boake, C., Levin, H., Aronowski, J., et al. (2004). Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke, 35(11 Suppl 1), 2699-2701. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350(6318), 498-500. Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H. B., Whelan, H., & Watson, R. T. (1985). Directional hypokinesia: prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology, 35(6), 855-859. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5(2), 166-170. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (2003). Neglect and related disorders. Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 296-346). New York: Oxford University Press. Heliman, K. M., Waston, R. T., & Valenstein, E. (1985). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heliman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical Neuropyschology (pp. 243-294). New York: Oxford University Press. Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Chang, Y. F., Chen, C. L., & Liu, J. S. (2009). Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 40(4), 1386-1391. Kalra, L., Perez, I., Gupta, S., & Wittink, M. (1997). The influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 28(7), 1386-1391. Katz, N., Hartman-Maeir, A., Ring, H., & Soroker, N. (1999). Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(4), 379-384. Kidd, D., Stewart, G., Baldry, J., Johnson, J., Rossiter, D., Petruckevitch, A., et al. (1995). The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 10-14. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 95, 143-146. Kinsbourne, M. (1985). Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neuropsyiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 69-86). New York: Elsevier. Konczak, J., & Karnath, H. O. (1998). Kinematics of goal-directed arm movements in neglect: control of hand velocity. Brain and Cognition, 37(3), 387-403. Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., & Wagenaar, R. C. (1999). Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy, 85(7), 377. Lang, C. E., Wagner, J. M., Dromerick, A. W., & Edwards, D. F. (2006). Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(12), 1605-1610. Lin, K. C. (1996). Right-hemispheric activation approaches to neglect rehabilitation poststroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(7), 504-515. Lin, K. C., Cermak, S. A., Kinsbourne, M., & Trombly, C. A. (1996). Effects of left-sided movements on line bisection in unilateral neglect. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(5), 404-411. Lin, K. C., Wu, C. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2008). A randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, 101, 61-64. Lin, K. C., Wu, C. Y., Wei, T. H., Lee, C. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2007). Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21(12), 1075-1086. Luaute, J., Halligan, P., Rode, G., Rossetti, Y., & Boisson, D. (2006). Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(7), 961-982. Mark, V. W., Taub, E., Perkins, C., Gauthier, L., & Uswatte, G. (2008). MRI infarction load and CI therapy outcomes for chronic post-stroke hemiparesis. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 26(1), 13-33. Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., & Nettleton, N. C. (1994). Residual rightward attentional bias after apparent recovery from right hemisphere damage: implications for a multicomponent model of neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 57(5), 597-604. Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., & Phillips, J. G. (1992). Impairments of movement initiation and execution in unilateral neglect. Directional hypokinesia and bradykinesia. Brain, 115 ( Pt 6), 1849-1874. Mattingley, J. B., Corben, L. A., Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., Phillips, J. G., & Horne, M. K. (1998). The effects of competition and motor reprogramming on visuomotor selection in unilateral neglect. Experimental Brain Research, 120(2), 243-256. Miltner, W. H., Bauder, H., Sommer, M., Dettmers, C., & Taub, E. (1999). Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke, 30(3), 586-592. Na, D. L., Adair, J. C., Williamson, D. J., Schwartz, R. L., Haws, B., & Heilman, K. M. (1998). Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 64(3), 331-338. O'Neill, B., & McMillan, T. M. (2004). The efficacy of contralesional limb activation in rehabilitation of unilateral hemiplegia and visual neglect: a baseline-intervention study Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14(4), 437-447. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113. Page, S. J., Levine, P., & Leonard, A. C. (2005). Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 19(1), 27-32. Page, S. J., Levine, P., Sisto, S., Bond, Q., & Johnston, M. V. (2002). Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16(1), 55-60. Page, S. J., Sisto, S., Johnston, M. V., & Levine, P. (2002). Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16(3), 290-295. Page, S. J., Sisto, S. A., & Levine, P. (2002). Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(11), 870-875. Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., Guariglia, C., Magnotti, L., Pizzamiglio, L., & Zoccolotti, P. (1996). Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: a cross-over study. Journal of Neurology, 243(4), 308-314. Pedersen, P. M., Wandel, A., Jorgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1996). Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(1), 25-28. Pierce, S. R., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2002). Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(2), 256-268. Plummer, A. C. (2003). Constraint-induced Therapy and the Motor Learning Literature That Underpins Its Application. Physical Therapy Reviews, 8, 143-149. Plummer, P., Morris, M. E., & Dunai, J. (2003). Assessment of unilateral neglect. Physical Therapy, 83(8), 732-740. Pohl, P. S., Winstein, C. J., & Onla-or, S. (1997). Sensory-motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity after stroke. Neurorehabilitation, 9, 57-69. Posner, M. I., & Rafal, R. D. (1987). Cognitive theories of attention and the rehabilitation of attentional deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 182. Punt, T. D., & Riddoch, M. J. (2006). Motor neglect: implications for movement and rehabilitation following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(13-14), 857-864. Rizzolatti, G. (1998). The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials Section, 106(4), 283. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25(1A), 31-40. Robertson, I., & Frasca, R. (1992). Attentional load and visual neglect. International Journal of Neuroscience, 62(1-2), 45-56. Robertson, I. H., Halligan, P. W., Bergego, C., Homberg, V., Pizzamiglio, L., Weber, E., et al. (1994). Right neglect following right hemisphere damage? Cortex, 30(2), 199-213. Robertson, I. H., & North, N. (1993a). Active and passive activation of left limbs: influence on visual and sensory neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31(3), 293-300. Robertson, I. H., & North, N. (1993b). Fatigue versus disengagement in unilateral neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 56(6), 717-719. Robertson, I. H., & North, N. T. (1994). One hand is better than two: motor extinction of left hand advantage in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 1-11. Robertson, I. H., North, N. T., & Geggie, C. (1992). Spatiomotor cueing in unilateral left neglect: three case studies of its therapeutic effects. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 55(9), 799-805. Sprague, J. M. (1966). Interaction of cortex and superior colliculus in mediation of visually guided behavior in the cat. Science, 153(743), 1544-1547. Stone, S. P., Halligan, P. W., & Greenwood, R. J. (1993). The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age and Ageing, 22(1), 46-52. Tarkka, I. M., Pitkanen, K., & Sivenius, J. (2005). Paretic hand rehabilitation with constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 501-505. Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., 3rd, Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C. S., et al. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(4), 347-354. Taub, E., & Morris, D. M. (2001). Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Current atherosclerosis reports, 3(4), 279-286. Van der Lee, J. H., De Groot, V., Beckerman, H., Wagenaar, R. C., Lankhorst, G. J., & Bouter, L. M. (2001). The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(1), 14-19. van der Lee, J. H., Wagenaar, R. C., Lankhorst, G. J., Vogelaar, T. W., Deville, W. L., & Bouter, L. M. (1999). Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke, 30(11), 2369-2375. Weintraub, S., & Mesulam, M.-M. (1985). Principles of behavioral eurology. Philadelphia: FA Davis. Winstein, C. J., & Pohl, P. S. (1995). Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 105(1), 163-174. Wolf, S. L., Blanton, S., Baer, H., Breshears, J., & Butler, A. J. (2002). Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist, 8(6), 325-338. Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Tang, S. F., Lin, K. C., & Huang, Y. Y. (2007). Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(8), 964-970. Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Tsai, W. C., Lin, K. C., & Chou, S. H. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for elderly stroke survivors: changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(3), 273-278. Wu, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Chen, H. C., Chen, I. H., & Hong, W. H. (2007). Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on movement kinematics and daily function in patients with stroke: a kinematic study of motor control mechanisms. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21(5), 460-466. Zeloni, G., Farne, A., & Baccini, M. (2002). Viewing less to see better. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 73(2), 195-198. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8957 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景: 半側忽略常見於右大腦損傷的中風患者,且會影響患者的日常生活功能與復健成效。患側空間的注意力缺損會導致患者於執行往對側空間之動作時出現障礙,亦會影響患側手(腦傷對側肢體)的動作復原。分散式侷限誘發療法為一新提倡適用於半側忽略症患者之介入方式,但其療效仍缺乏相關研究之探討。分散式侷限誘發療法可迫使患側手產生主動動作,並誘發患者增加對於患側空間的注意力,進而改善忽略症相關的動作缺損並促進動作之復原。本研究的目的為探討中風後忽略症患者接受分散式侷限誘發療法相較於控制療法於功能獨立,動作缺損及動作復原方面的改善程度。
方法: 本研究將11位中風後呈現半側忽略症之患者隨機分派至分散式侷限誘發療法組或控制治療組。分散式侷限誘發療法組患者從事每天2小時、每週5天的密集訓練,並每天侷限健側手6小時,為期3週;控制組則接受等量之傳統治療。成效評量採用運動學分析以探討患者往患側空間執行伸手及物的動作表現;臨床評估工具為功能性獨立測驗、傅格-梅爾動作復原評估量表、手臂動作研究測驗及動作活動日誌以評估患者生活功能及動作方面之改善程度。 結果: 隨機分派後,兩組參與研究之患者的特徵與前測時的動作表現皆無顯著差異。運動學分析結果顯示,分散式侷限誘發療法組相較於控制組於健側手執行跨中線往對側空間的伸手及物動作時,兩組之反應時間 (P=0.020)、動作時間 (P=0.017) 及尖峰速度 (P=0.013),達統計顯著差異。接受分散式侷限誘發療法之患者呈現較好的動作控制策略,兩組於動作控制策略的表現差異接近顯著水平且達高度效果值(P =0.052; effect size η2=0.334)。兩組患者於患側手執行伸手及物的動作表現上並無顯著差異,但接受分散式侷限誘發療法之患者於動作控制策略的改善仍呈現較好之趨勢,為中度至高度的效果值 (P =0.188; effect size η2=0.113)。在臨床評估結果方面,兩組於功能性獨立測驗 (P=0.017) 及其動作分量表 (P=0.009) 達統計顯著差異。在動作活動日誌之次量表中,患側手使用量 (AOU of MAL, P=0.015) 與患側手使用品質 (QOM of MAL, P=0.023) 結果皆達顯著差異。雖然兩組於傅格-梅爾動作復原評估量表之改善並無顯著差異(P=0.295; effect size η2=0.044),但分散式侷限誘發療法組的患者於動作復原的改善程度仍呈現較大的進步趨勢。兩組於手臂動作研究測驗的表現中亦未達顯著差異且效果值較小 (P =0.395; effect size η2=0.011)。 結論: 經過為期3週的分散式侷限誘發療法,患者於功能性日常活動之獨立程度獲得顯著提升。健側手往患側空間的動作表現亦呈現顯著的改善,顯示患側手之主動動作可誘發往患側空間的注意力,進而降低其動作障礙。此外,分散式侷限誘發療法同時能促使患者增加對於患側手動作之注意力,使患者於日常生活活動中增加使用患側手的次數並改善動作品質。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Unilateral neglect is a common disorder in right-hemisphere stroke patients and produced impact on reaching performances of both arms and on motor recovery of the more affected arm. Distributed constraint induced therapy (dCIT) has received much attention to become a new treatment of unilateral neglect. However the effects of dCIT in stroke patients with unilateral neglect remained uncertain. We proposed that dCIT could induce reduction of neglect and thus lead improvements in the related motor deficits. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether unilateral neglect patients would benefit more from dCIT, compared with controlled treatment.
Methods: 11 patients with unilateral neglect following stroke were recruited and were allocated randomly to dCIT group (2-hour practice in weekdays for 3 consecutive weeks and constraint of the less affected arm for 6 hours per day) and controlled treatment group (traditional rehabilitation for equivalent intensity and duration). We used kinematic analysis and clinical assessments (the Functional Independence Measure, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Action Research Arm Test, and the Motor Activity Log) to investigate the outcomes of reaching movements towards contralesional space, and functional and motor improvements. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups at pretreatment. Patients receiving dCIT showed significant improvements of the less affected arm in reaction time (P=0.020), movement time (P=0.017), and peak velocity (P=0.013) and showed greater improvement in preplanned motor control (p=0.052; effect size η2=0.334). For the more affected arm, there were no significant differences in the kinematic variables, though the dCIT produced a moderate to large effect on better motor control strategy (P =0.188; effect size η2=0.113). Patients after dCIT showed significant improvement in independence in daily functional tasks, especially in motor domain (FIM, P=0.017; FIM_motor, P=0.009) and improvement in functional use of the more affected arm (AOU of MAL, P=0.015; QOM of MAL, P=0.023). Though patients in dCIT group showed greater tendency in motor improvement measured by FMA, it failed to reach significant level (P =0.295; effect size η2=0.044). The two groups showed a non significant and small effect of ARAT (P =0.395; effect size η2=0.011). Conclusions: After three-week dCIT intervention, compared with CT, patients presented much more independence in activities of daily living and had better motor performance while reaching with the less affected arm toward the contralesional space. Additionally, patients were facilitated to spontaneously use the more affected arm and perform better in functional activities. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:05:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96429012-1.pdf: 761323 bytes, checksum: eaf442f905846f99199d3c4737110fe5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
學位考試審查表…………………………………………………………….…...…………i 誌謝………………………………………………………………………………..…………ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………iii Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………v Contents……………………………..………………………………...…………………vii List of tables….…………………………………………………………………………xii List of figures………………………..…………………………………………………xiv CHAPTER 1 Literature Review Background………………………………………………………..…………..…….……1-1 Unilateral neglect……………………………………………...…………….….……..…1-2 The motor deficits attributed to unilateral neglect………………………………….…...1-3 Limb activation………………………………………………………………..……….…1-5 Constraint-induced therapy…………………………………….…………..…………...1-6 Background…………………………………………………………………………..….1-7 Possible mechanisms of CIT…………………………………………………….………1-7 Treatment strategy…………………………………………………………..……….…..1-8 Effects of CIT in patients with stroke………………………………………..…….……1-9 Effects of CIT in patients with unilateral neglect after stroke………………......……..1-10 Eye patching…………………………………………………………………..…………1-11 Background………………………………………………………………………...…..1-11 Possible mechanism………………………………………………………..…………..1-12 Treatment strategy……………………………………………………..……………….1-12 Effects of eye patching on unilateral neglect……………………………..…………....1-12 Effects of motor training combined with eye patching on unilateral neglect….............1-13 References………………………………………………………………………..………1-14 CHAPTER 2 Effects of Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy in Stroke Survivors with Unilateral Neglect: Kinematic Analysis and Clinical Assessments Introduction…………………………………………………………...……………….......2-1 Purpose……………………………………………………………………….………….2-4 Hypotheses………………………………………………………….……………...........2-4 Methods………………………………………………………………….………………...2-5 Design……………………………………………………………………………...…....2-5 Participants………………………………………………………………..….……….....2-5 Intervention…………………………………………………………………...................2-6 Materials and Instrumentation…………………………………………………...……...2-7 Clinical evaluation…………………………………………………………..………..2-7 Screening measures…………………………………………………………….…..2-7 Outcome measures…………………………………………………………………2-8 Kinematic evaluation………………………………………………………………...2-9 Testing procedure…………………………………………………………………2-10 Data reduction for kinematic variables……………………………....…………...2-11 Statistics…………………………………………………………………………….….2-12 Results………………………………………………………………….…………………2-13 Characteristics of study patients…………………………………………...………..…2-13 Effects of distributed CIT on kinematics………………………………………………2-13 Effects of distributed CIT on clinical measures…………………..……………………2-14 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………….2-16 Limitations and future study………………………………………………………...…2-19 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..………...2-20 References……………………………………………………………………………..…2-21 CHAPTER 3 Effects of Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy Combined with Eye Patching in Stroke Survivors with Unilateral Neglect: Kinematic Analysis and Clinical Assessments Introduction…………………………………………………...……………………….......3-1 Purpose…………………………………………………………………………….…….3-2 Hypotheses………………………………………………………………….……...........3-3 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………3-4 Design……………………………………………………………………………...…....3-4 Participants……………………………………………………………...…………….....3-4 Intervention……………………………………………………………….……………..3-5 Materials and Instrumentation…………………………………………………………..3-6 Clinical assessments…………………………………………………………………..3-6 Kinematic measure……….…………………………………………………………...3-8 Testing procedure………………………………………………………………..…3-8 Data reduction for kinematic variables…………………………...………………..3-9 Statistics………………………………………………………………………..…...….3-10 Results……………………………………………………………….……………………3-11 Characteristics of study patients……………………………………………………..…3-11 Effects of distributed CIT combined with eye patching on kinematics……………..…3-11 Effects of distributed CIT combined with eye patching on clinical measures…………3-12 Discussion……………………………………………………………………..…………3-13 Limitations and future study……………………………………………………….…3-15 Conclusion……………………………………………………..…………………...……3-16 References…………………………………………………………………..……………3-17 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 分散式侷限誘發療法於中風後忽略症患者之療效研究:運動學分析與臨床評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy in Stroke Survivors with Unilateral Neglect: Kinematic Analysis and Clinical Assessments | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳菁宜(Ching-Yi Wu),蔡佩倫(Pei-Lun Tsai) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 半側忽略,功能性獨立,運動學分析,伸手及物動作,中風, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Unilateral neglect,functional independence,kinematic analysis,reaching movement,stroke, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf | 743.48 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。