請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88486
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 胡凱焜 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Kan-Kuen Hu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊昇樺 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Sheng-Hua Yang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T16:31:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-31 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.維基百科,聯合國氣候變遷綱要公約,https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/聯合國氣候變化框架公約。
2.環保署溫室氣體減量資訊平台,https://ghgrule.epa.gov.tw。 3.台灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心,2022,開放能源網路:2022年能源轉型綜述,https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/en-trans/open-energy/1767-2022-open-energy-review.html。 4.行政院農業委員會,2018,農漁字第1071346797號https://law.coa.gov.tw/glrsnewsout/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000938。 5.信傳媒,2023,七股民眾北上抗議「種電氾濫」光電業者願溝通 經濟部承諾總量管制,https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/36960。 6.周桂田,2016,氣候變遷驅動台灣能源轉型挑戰。載於周桂田、林子倫 (編),台灣能源轉型十四講 (頁3-26). 台北:巨流圖書公司。 7.胡太山、林海萍、潘思錡、賈秉靜,2019, 綠能產業創新模式之形塑: 台灣經驗. 建築與規劃學報, 20(1), 27-44。 8.許志義、楊宗霖、蔡志祥、葉法明,2020,論市場導向之綠電發展策略. 台灣能源期刊, 7(4), 365-387。 9.MBAlib維基,價值共創 [Value co-creation],https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/價值共創。 10.李朝輝、金永生,2013,價值共創研究綜述與展望。北京郵電大學學報(社會科學版), (2),91—96。 11.蘇怡仲 (譯),2001,競爭加倍速: 創新制勝 (J. F. Moore著)。臺北市: 智庫股份有限公司。 12.經濟部能源局,2020,太陽光電暨漁電共生推動策略說明,https://www.mrpv.org.tw/Utility/ShowAbstractFD.aspx?mid=2803。 13.中央研究院經濟研究所,2020,適地分佈之評估及漁電共生系統之設計與最佳化 (研究報告編號CRES104)。國立臺灣大學漁業研究中心,http://cfe-fish.blog.ntu.edu.tw/upload/doc/202010261006190.pdf。 14.Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. Proefschrift Erasmus Universiteit, 193, 301-314. 15.Frantzeskaki, N., Loorbach, D., & Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Governing Societal Transitions to Sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1/2), 19-36. 16.Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2006). Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development. Dordrecht: Springer. 17.Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jeweii, J., Brutschin, E., & Sovacool, B. (2018). Integrating Techno-economic Analysis and Behavioral Science for Sustainable Energy Policy. Nature Energy, 3, 589-596. 18.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. 19.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23. 20.Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value Creation through Stakeholder Synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314-329. 21.Bridoux, F., & Stoelhost, J. (2016). Stakeholder Relationships and Social Welfare: A Behavioral Theory of Contributions to Joint Value Creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 229-251. 22.Gyrd-Jones, R. I., & Kornum, N. (2013). Managing the Co-created Brand: Value the Cultural Complementarity in Online and Offline Multi-stakeholder Ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1484-1493. 23.Pera, R., Occhiocupo, N., & Clarke, J. (2016). Motive and Resources for Value Co-creation in a Multi-stakeholder Ecosystem: A Managerial Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4033-4041. 24.Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the Co-creation of Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96. 25.Klein, P. G., Mahony, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2019). Organizational Governance Adaptation: Who Is In, Who Is Out, And Who Gets What. Academy of Management Review, 44(1), 6-27. 26.Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2020). Broadening our Sight to Rethink Capitalism: A Multi-level Stakeholder Approach. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. 27.Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 75-86. 28.Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 29.Hancock, B. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. National Institute for Health Research. 30.Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. 31.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications. 32.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. 33.Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. 34.Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is Co-creation? An Interactional Creation Framework and Its Implications for Value Creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196-205. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88486 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣的水產養殖業已經發展了數百年,然而產業已經進入了衰退期。2011年,台灣開始進行能源轉型,刺激了新的產業生態系出現。2015年,聯合國宣布「2030永續發展目標」,其中漁電共生與17項永續發展目標中的多項有高度相關性,例如消除飢餓、可負擔的純淨能源、尊嚴就業與經濟發展、產業創新與基礎建設、負責任的消費與生產、保育陸域生態、永續城市與社區。這加速了產業的合作與創新,產、官、學、研也紛紛作出策略上的布局及合作。
本研究從價值共創的觀點出發,以台灣的漁電共生模式為例,透過質性研究方法的半結構式訪談,以『價值共創』、『生態系統』為理論模型的基礎,分析漁電共生與各利害關係人如何進行資源整合與合作,以及策劃和推進永續生態系統的發展。漁電共生是指利用水產養殖場所剩餘的資源來發電,這個模式結合了生態保護和能源開發的需求,透過價值共創的策略,推動了生態與經濟的可持續發展。 我們將以『漁電共生』產業中的產、官、學、研作為主要的質性研究對象,研究目的在於以價值共創觀點深入研究如何讓產業內的多方利害關係人(Multiple Stakeholders)參與生態系統,並分析產業內的各方如何進行協作進行價值共創,最終期望演化成一個持續創新與進步的生態系統。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Taiwan's aquaculture industry has developed for hundreds of years, but it has entered a period of decline. In 2011, Taiwan began to undergo energy transformation, stimulating the emergence of a new industrial ecosystem. In 2015, the United Nations announced the "2030 Sustainable Development Goals", among which aqua-electric symbiosis is highly relevant to several of the 17 sustainable development goals, such as eradicating hunger, affordable and clean energy, decent work and economic growth, industry innovation and infrastructure, responsible consumption and production, terrestrial ecosystem conservation, and sustainable cities and communities. This has accelerated the collaboration and innovation within the industry, prompting strategies and cooperation from industry, government, academia, and research entities.
This study sets out from the perspective of value co-creation, taking Taiwan's aqua-electric symbiosis model as an example, and uses semi-structured interviews in qualitative research methods. With "value co-creation" and "ecosystem" as the foundation of the theoretical model, we analyze how aqua-electric symbiosis and various stakeholders carry out resource integration and cooperation, as well as planning and promoting the development of sustainable ecosystems. Aqua-electric symbiosis refers to generating electricity from the remaining resources in aquaculture farms. This model combines the needs of ecological conservation and energy development, and promotes the sustainable development of ecology and economy through the strategy of value co-creation. We will take the "industry, government, academia, and research in the aqua-electric symbiosis industry" as the main subjects of qualitative research. The research purpose is to deeply study how to get multiple stakeholders in the industry to participate in the ecosystem from the perspective of value co-creation, and analyze how the parties within the industry cooperate to co-create value. Eventually, we hope to evolve into a continuously innovative and progressive ecosystem. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T16:31:09Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T16:31:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 碩士學位論文口試委員審定書 I
致謝 II 摘要 III Abstract Ⅳ 目錄 VI 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 3 1.3 研究問題與目的 5 1.4 研究流程與架構 6 第二章 文獻探討 7 2.1永續轉型 7 2.2 能源政策與推行方案 10 2.3 生態系統 12 2.3.1 商業生態系的意涵與結構 12 2.3.2 商業生態系的策略意涵 13 2.3.3 商業生態系之發展階段 15 2.4價值共創 16 2.4.1 價值共創的定義及模式 16 2.4.2 價值共創理論下,商業企業價值鏈結構改變與新特徵 18 2.4.3 服務論點之價值共創 20 2.4.4 策略論點之價值共創 21 2.4.5 利害關係人論點之價值共創 22 2.5文獻探討之小結 25 第三章 研究方法 26 3.1 質性研究方法 26 3.2 個案研究法 27 3.3 資料收集 28 3.3.1 初級資料收集 28 3.3.2 次級資料收集 30 3.4 資料分析 33 第四章 個案分析及討論 34 4.1 產業背景介紹 34 4.1.1 漁電共生介紹 34 4.1.2 漁電共生產業概況 34 4.1.3 漁電共生各方立場考量 36 4.2 連結利害關係人 41 4.3 集體協作,共創價值 43 4.4 以價值共創觀點討論漁電共生生態系之形成 45 4.4.1 價值主張為基礎,號招同思維的參與者 46 4.4.2 關鍵夥伴與互補資源 46 4.4.3 多利害關係人集體合作 47 4.4.4 共創價值形成生態系統 48 4.4.5 分析小結 49 第五章 結論與建議 54 5.1 研究結論 54 5.1.1 整合產業資源可以帶來更大的集體價值 54 5.1.2 提出價值主張,利用資源整合進行價值共創 55 5.1.3 價值共創中,讓參與者產生動能,更能讓生態系穩定發展55 5.2 研究建議 55 5.3 研究貢獻 57 5.3.1 學術貢獻 57 5.3.2 實務貢獻 58 5.4 研究限制 58 5.4.1 資料收集限制 58 5.4.2 單一個案之限制 58 5.4.3 未來研究建議 59 參考文獻 60 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 從價值共創觀點探討永續生態系之發展策略 -以台灣漁電共生為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring the development strategies of sustainable ecosystems from a value co-creation perspective - A case study of aqua-electric symbiosis in Taiwan. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊凡逸;潘令妍 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Fan-Yi Yang;Ling-Yen Pan | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 漁電共生,價值共創,永續生態系,多方利害關係人, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Aqua-Electric Symbiosis,Value Co-creation,Sustainable Ecosystem,Multiple Stakeholders, | en |
dc.relation.page | 63 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302294 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-02 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 進修推廣學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物科技管理碩士在職學位學程 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物科技管理碩士在職學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 5.17 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。