請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87611
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭麗珍 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Li-Chen Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳彥竹 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Chu Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-20T16:21:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-06-20 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-17 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
王滋苑(2016)。從服務使用者角度探究兒童少年保護個案服務處遇之成效 〔未出版之博士論文〕。屏東科技大學社會工作系。 王琳(2008)。親職認知對管教行為的影響:探討兒童衝突的管教。中華心理衛生學刊,21(3),245-272。 尹欣如(2013)。兒童虐待事件中社工風險評估與成案決策之相關性探究──以桃園縣家暴中心為例〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所。 內政部兒童局(2005)。兒童及少年保護工作指南。台灣社會工作專業人員協會編撰。 American Humane Association.(2011).兒少保護社會工作。(鄭麗珍 總校閱)。洪業文化。(原著出版於2004年) 呂安雅(2013)。從公私部門觀點探討兒少保工作團隊落實家庭處遇協同合作之現況〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立屏東科技大學社會工作系研究所。 吳芝瑩(2017)。家庭維繫服務社工人員之處遇實務探討〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學社會工作學研究所。 余漢儀(1995)。兒童虐待:現象檢視與問題反思。巨流圖書公司。 余漢儀(2014)。台灣兒少保護的變革兼論高風險家庭服務方案的影響。台灣社會研究季刊,96,137-173。 佘耕任(2017)。管控誰的風險?臺灣兒少保護案件的實務成案標準〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所。 宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍(2002)。社會工作理論-處遇模式與案例分析。洪葉文化。 宋麗玉、施教裕(2009)。優勢觀點─社會工作理論與實務。洪葉文化。 宋麗玉、施教裕、張錦麗(2004)。九十三年推動受暴婦女優點個案管理模式之教育訓練、督導與評估計畫案。內政部家庭暴力暨性侵害防治委員會。 沈瓊桃(2018)。處罰父母、拯救小孩?臺灣強制性親職教育輔導的結果評估:以兒虐再通報率為指標。社會政策與社會工作學刊,22,97-133。 Babbie, E. (2005)。社會科學研究方法(第九版,上下。李美華譯)。時英。(原著出版於1998年) Babbie, E. (2019)。研究方法:基礎理論與技巧(三版。林佳瑩審閱、蔡毓智譯)。雙葉書廊。(原著出版於1993年) 林宜輝、陳怡如(2017)。國際兒童保護體制改革之制度論初探:以兒童保護與家庭支持典範交流為例,及其對臺灣兒保改革之啟發。臺大社會工作學刊,36,97-136。http://dx.doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr2017.36.03 林賢文、張必宜(2003)。兒童保護家庭重整服務中社工員之處遇決策與角色-以 臺北市兒童少年保護工作為例。性別、兒童與社會福利-成長停滯年代下的思考研討會,嘉義縣,台灣。 林明禛(2019)。探討重複開案受虐兒童家庭特質及社工處遇。東吳社會工作學報,36,33-56。 Weber, R.P.(1989)。內容分析法導論(林義男、陳淳文譯)。巨流文化。(原著出版於1990年) 鈕文英(2021)。研究方法與設計:量化、質性與混合方法取向(三版)。雙葉書廊。 香港明愛青少年及社區服務、香港城市大學應用社會科學系(2015年2月)。虐兒行為成因及對兒童成長的影響調查研究報告。香港明愛青少年及社區服務。 高淑芳、陸洛(2001)。父母管教態度與國中生升學考試壓力感受之關係。應用心理研究,10,221-250。 孫旻儀、王鍾和(2008)。「教師管教方式量表」之編製及模式之驗證研究。測驗學刊,55(3),611-633。 孫旻儀(2010)。父母管教方式對教師管教方式影響之代間傳遞模式探討。輔導與諮商學報,32(1),43-66。http://dx.doi.org/10.7040/JGC.201005.0043 連珮榕(2020)。公部門兒少保個案之家庭處遇模式── 以高雄市家防中心為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學社會工作研究所。 張心怡、馮瑞鶯、黃美智(2019)。兒童虐待之研究倫理議題。護理雜誌,66(5),72-79。http://dx.doi.org/10.6224/JN.201910_66(5).10 張秀鴛、辜煜偉(2016)。兒少虐待防治工作發展與前瞻。社區發展季刊,156,8-15。 陳怡廷(2016)。進行家庭維繫服務之社工員結案決策探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系。 陳治緯(2018)。淺談父母管教方式與青少年憂鬱情緒。家庭教育雙月刊,71,40-44。http://dx.doi.org/10.6422/JFEB 陳啟榮(2011)。學校體罰迷思之釐清。諮商與輔導,305,61-63+56。http://dx.doi.org/10.29837/CG 陳清檳、黃文喜、張文宗(2010)。高職電機電子群學生父母管教方式、學習態度與學習成效知覺之研究。教育與多元文化研究,2,223-260。 陳婉琪、徐崇倫(2011)。愛的教育,鐵的紀律?父母教養方式與青少年心理健康之相關。教育研究集刊,57(2),121-154。http://dx.doi.org/10.6910/BER.201106_(57-2).0004 陳榮華、盧欽銘、洪有義、陳李綢(1980)。教師、學生及家長對體罰意見的調查研究。教育心理學報,13,57-74。 黃雅慧(2010)。合法管教與違法處罰之區辨。國教新知,57(1),83-96。http://dx.doi.org/10.6701/TEEJ.201003_57(1).0008 許如悅、鄭麗珍(2003)。兒保工作人員對兒虐案件之風險研判與處遇決策。社會政策與社會工作學刊,7(1),163-213。http://dx.doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.200306.0163 許廣名(2013)。台灣地區兒少身體暴力傷害型態之分析〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學法醫研究所。 教育部國民及學前教育署(2021)。教育人員兒童及少年保護工作手冊。教育部。 游美貴(2015)。家庭暴力防治:社工對被害人服務實務。洪葉文化。 葉毓蘭、黃翠紋、張詔雄(2004)。家庭暴力防治專業人員工作手冊 校園處理兒童少年遭受虐待/目睹婚姻暴力實務工作手冊。教育部。 衛生福利部(2016)。兒少虐待及疏忽:醫事人員工作手冊。衛生福利部。 衛生福利部保護服務司(2021)。兒童及少年保護統計專區。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/lp-1303-105-xCat-cat04.html。 衛生福利部、教育部內政部、勞動部(2018)。強化社會安全網計畫。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3763-40093-1.html 衛生福利部、教育部、法務部、內政部、勞動部(2021)。強化社會安全網計畫第二期計畫(110-114)。https://topics.mohw.gov.tw/SS/cp-4515-62472-204.html 廖秋芬(1997)。社會工作員對兒童保護案件處遇計畫的價值抉擇之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東海大學社會工作學系。 趙善如(2009)。提昇兒童少年保護個案家庭處遇組織間合作效能之要素:從實務工作者觀點探討之。臺大社會工作學刊,20,133-177。http://dx.doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr2009.20.04 鄭善明、王素芬、陳獻益、田業勇、潘雪芳、鄭淑琪(2009)。受虐兒童保護服務處遇模式之研究-以屏東縣為例。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,7,43+45-70。http://dx.doi.org/10.29750/TJTHCA.200910.0003 鄭麗珍(2015)。兒童少年保護社會工作實務手冊。巨流圖書公司。 盧樺熠(2011)。從系統理論談兒童及少年保護處遇工作。諮商與輔導,305,40-44。 瞿海源,畢恆達,劉長萱,楊國樞,蘇國賢,王增勇,林本炫,林國明,柯志明,徐振國,湯京平,吳嘉苓,周平,黃應貴,蕭阿勤,藍佩嘉(2012)。社會及行為科學研究法二:質性研究法。台灣東華書局股份有限公司。 劉俊良、張弘遠、陳意文 (2019)。父母管教方式與青少年偏差行為之相關研究。致理學報,39,419-458。 劉淑瓊、呂立(2017)。重大兒童及少年虐待事件分析研究。衛生福利部委託研究。 劉淑瓊、彭淑華(2008)。兒虐致死及攜子自殺成因探討及防治策略之研究。內政部兒童局97年度委託研究計畫。 劉雅涵(2021)。父母懲戒權範圍之法實證研究:體罰的合理界線〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所。 魏道名(2018)。誰與同行-兒少保護個案之主要照顧者接受服務的經驗〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系。 英文部分 Afifi, T. O., Ford, D., Gershoff, E. T., Merrick, M., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Ports, K. A., MacMillan, H. L., Holden, G. W., Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., & Peters Bennett, R. (2017). Spanking and adult mental health impairment: The case for the designation of spanking as an adverse childhood experience. Child abuse & neglect, 71, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.014 Afifi, T.O., Fortier, J., MacMillan, H.L. et al. (2019). Examining the relationships between parent experiences and youth self-reports of slapping/spanking: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19, 1345. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7729-6 Altschul, Inna & Lee, Shawna & Gershoff, Elizabeth. (2016). Hugs, Not Hits: Warmth and Spanking as Predictors of Child Social Competence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 695-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12306. Antle, B. F., Christensen, D. N., van Zyl, M. A., & Barbee, A. P. (2012). The impact of the Solution Based Casework (SBC) practice model on federal outcomes in public child welfare. Child abuse & neglect, 36(4), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.009 Antle, B. F., Barbee, A. P., Christensen, D. N., & Sullivan, D. J. (2009). The prevention of child maltreatment recidivism through the Solution-Based Casework model of child welfare practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12). https://doi.org/1346–1351.10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.06.008 Barlow, J., Simkiss, D. and Stewart‐Brown, S. (2006). Interventions to prevent or ameliorate child physical abuse and neglect: findings from a systematic review of reviews. Journal of Children's Services, 1(3), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17466660200600020 Bavolek, S.J. ( 2000, November ). The Nurturing Parenting Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Bigger, Lee., Jones Marla, Nelson Laurence(2021). Solution Based Casework (SBC) Because “What Happens After The Knock Matters”. Family Solution-Solution based casework training. https://oca.georgia.gov/document/publication/csolutionbasedcaseworkgasummitpresentationoriginal1511293521pdf/download Belsky, J., & Vondra, J. (1989). Lessons from child abuse: The determinants of parenting. In D. Cicchetti & V. Carlson (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 153–202). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665707.007 Britner,P.A., Mossler,D.G.,(2002), Professionals' decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(4) ,317-332.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00311-3 Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26071r6 Carter, E. & McGoldrick, Monica. (1980). The family life cycle: An overview. The family life cycle: A framework for family therapy, 3-20. Chen, M., & Chan, K. L. (2016). Effects of Parenting Programs on Child Maltreatment Prevention: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma, violence & abuse, 17(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566718 Children’’s Bureau. (2015). Child and family services reviews: Procedure manual. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/ sites/default/files/cb/round3_procedures_manual.pdf Coleman, DL., Dodge, K.A., Campbell, SK. (2010). Where and How to Draw the Line Between Reasonable Corporal Punishment and Abuse. Law and contemporary problems, 73, 107-166. UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). (2007). General comment No. 8 (2006): The Right of the Child to Protection from Corporal Punishment and Other Cruel or Degrading Forms of Punishment (Arts. 19; 28, Para. 2; and 37, inter alia). CRC/C/GC/8. https://www.refworld.org/docid/460bc7772.html Delfabbro, P., Elizabeth, F., & Mccormick, J., & Kettler, L. (2013). Reunification in a complete entry cohort: A longitudinal study of children entering out-of-home care in Tasmania, Australia. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1592-1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.06.012 DePanfilis, D., & Zuravin, S. J. (1998). Rates, patterns, and frequency of child maltreatment recurrences among families known to CPS. Child Maltreatment, 3, 27-42. DePanfilis, D., & Zuravin, S. J. (1999). Predicting child maltreatment recurrences during treatment. Child abuse & neglect, 23(8), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(99)00046-0 DePanfilis, D. (2000). How do I use case record keeping to guide intervention and provide accountability? In H. Dubowitz & D. DePanfilis (Eds.), Handbook for child protection practice (pp. 598–603). Sage Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452205489 Depanfilis, D., Salus, M. K. & United States Office Of Child Abuse And Neglect. (2003). Child Protective Services: A Guide for Caseworkers. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect. DePanfilis, Diane. (2018). Child Protective Services: A Guide for Caseworkers. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/cps2018.pdf#page=10&view=Chapter%. Baginsky, M., Manthorpe, J., & Moriarty, J. (2020). The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families and Signs of Safety: Competing or Complementary Frameworks?. The British Journal of Social Work, 51, 2571–2589. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa058 Durrant, J., & Ensom, R. (2012). Physical punishment of children: lessons from 20 years of research. Canadian Medical Association journal, 184(12), 1373–1377. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101314 Finan, S., Bromfield, L., Arney, F., & Moore, T. (2018). Assessing the quality and comprehensiveness of child protection practice frameworks. Adelaide: Australian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., Wormuth, BK., Vanderminden, J., & Hamby, S. (2019). Corporal Punishment: Current Rates from a National Survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1991–1997 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01426-4 Fluke, J.D., Shusterman, G.S., Hollinshead, D., Yuan., McDonald, W.R., & Associates. (2005). Rereporting and recurrence of child maltreatment: Findings from NCANDS. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/rereporting-recurrence-child-maltreatment-findings-ncands-1 Fortson, B. L., Klevens, J., Merrick, M. T., Gilbert, L. K., & Alexander, S. P. (2016). Preventing child abuse and neglect: A technical package for policy, norm, and programmatic activities. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://dx.doi.org/10.15620/cdc.38864 Fréchette, S., Zoratti, M., & Romano, E. (2015). What Is the Link Between Corporal Punishment and Child Physical Abuse? Journal of Family Violence, 30(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9663-9 Gershoff E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological bulletin, 128(4), 539–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539 Gershoff, E.T. (2013), Spanking and Child Development: We Know Enough Now to Stop Hitting Our Children. Child Dev Perspect, 7(3), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12038 Gershoff, E. T., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of family psychology, 30(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000191 Goldman, J., Salus, M. K., Wolcott, D., & Kennedy, K. Y (2003). A coordinated response to child abuse and neglect: The foundation for practice. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., Administration for Children and Families., Administration on Children, Youth and Families., Children's Bureau., & Office on Child Abuse and Neglect. http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/foundation/index.cfm Greene, R. R., & Ephress, P. H. (1991). Human behavior theory and social work practice. Walter de Gruyter & Co. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications, Inc. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications, Inc. Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Mokros, A. (2018). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, properties, debates, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 39–79). The Guilford Press. Hélie, S., & Bouchard, C. (2009). Recurrent reporting of child maltreatment: State of knowledge and avenues for research. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(3), 416–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.013 Hindley, N., Ramchandani, P. G., & Jones, D. P. H. (2006). Risk factors for recurrence of maltreatment: A systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91(9), 744–752. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.085639 Holzer, P., Bromfield, L., & Richardson, N. (2006). The effectiveness of parent education programs for preventing child maltreatment. Child Family Community Australia. Laslett, A. M., Room, R., Dietze, P., & Ferris, J. (2012). Alcohol's involvement in recurrent child abuse and neglect cases. Addiction, 107(10), 1786–1793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03917.x Lipien, L., & Forthofer, M. S. (2004). An event history analysis of recurrent child maltreatment reports in Florida. Child abuse & neglect, 28(9), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.03.011 Lundahl, B. W., J. Nimer and Parsons, B. (2006). Preventing Child Abuse: A Meta-Analysis of Parent Training Programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(3), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731505284391 Isokuortti, N., Aaltio, E., Laajasalo, T., & Barlow, J. (2020). Effectiveness of child protection practice models: a systematic review. Child abuse & neglect, 108, 104632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104632 Jackson, S., Kelly, L., & Leslie, B. (2017). Parental participation in statutory child protection intervention in Scotland. British Journal of Social Work, 47(5), 1445-1463. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw090 Jenkins, B. Q., Tilbury, C., Hayes, H., & Mazerolle, P. (2018). Factors associated with child protection recurrence in Australia. Child abuse & neglect, 81, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.05.002 Jent, J. F., Eaton, C. K., Knickerbocker, L., Lambert, W. F., Merrick, M. T., & Dandes, S. K. (2011). Multidisciplinary Child Protection Decision Making About Physical Abuse: Determining Substantiation Thresholds and Biases. Children and youth services review, 33(9), 1673–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.029 Jud, A., Fegert, J. M., & Finkelhor, D. (2016). On the incidence and prevalence of child maltreatment: A research agenda. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 10(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-016-0105-8 Tripodi, Stephen & Kennedy, Stephanie & Kim, Johnny & Brown, Samantha & Gowdy, Grace. (2014). Does Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Reduce Future Physical Abuse? A Meta-Analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514543024. Kjellgren, C., Svedin, C. G., & Nilsson, D. (2013). Child Physical Abuse—Experiences of combined treatment for children and their parents: A pilot study. Child Care in Practice, 19(3), 275–290. Kok, E. (2011). Methodebeschrijving Signs of Safety: Databank effectieve interventies huiselijk geweld. Movisie. www.movisie.nl/effectievesocialeinterventies Levey, E. J., Gelaye, B., Bain, P., Rondon, M. B., Borba, C. P., Henderson, D. C., & Williams, M. A. (2017). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions designed to decrease child abuse in high-risk families. Child abuse & neglect, 65, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.004 MacLeod, J., & Nelson, G. (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: a meta-analytic review. Child abuse & neglect, 24(9), 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(00)00178-2 Milevsky, A., Schlechter, M., Netter, S. et al. (2007). Maternal and Paternal Parenting Styles in Adolescents: Associations with Self-Esteem, Depression and Life-Satisfaction. J Child Fam Stud, 16, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9066-5 Mills, G.E., & Gay, L.R. (2018). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (12th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Molloy, D., Barton, S., & Brims, L. (2017). Improving the effectiveness of the child protection system: overview. Early Intervention Foundation. https://www.eif.org.uk/report/improving-the-effectiveness-of-the-child-protection-system-overview Montgomery, P., Gardner, F., Ramchandani, P., & Bjornstad, G. (2015). Systematic review of interventions following physical abuse. Department for Education. Nelson, G., Laurendeau, M.C., & Chamberland, C. (2001). A review of programs to promote family wellness and prevent the maltreatment of children. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 33(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087123 Norman, R. E., Byambaa, M., De, R., Butchart, A., Scott, J., & Vos, T. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS medicine, 9(11), e1001349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349 Patel, S. N., Shanmugam, I., Obong'o, C., Mupambireyi, Z., Kasese, C., Bangani, Z., & Miller, K. S. (2021). Child disciplinary practices, abuse, and neglect: Findings from a formative study in Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe. Child abuse & neglect, 115, 105016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105016 Pecora, P. J., Whittaker, J. K., Maluccio, A.N., Barth, R. P. (2000). The Child Welfare Challenge:Policy, Practice, and Research (2th ed.). Aldine Transaction. Straus, M. A., & Donnelly, D. A. (2001). Beating the Devil out of Them: Corporal Punishment in American Families and its Effects on Children (1st ed.). Routledge Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1997). Aspiring to Partnership. The Signs of Safety approach to child protection. Child Abuse Review, 6, 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0852(199708)6:33.0.CO;2-J. Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of Safety: A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework (1st Ed.). W.W. Norton & Company. United Kingdom, Department for Education. (2018, July). Working together to safeguard children : A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. HM Government. https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/22324/ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Child and family service reviews. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/monitoring/child-family-services-reviews. Van der Put, C. E., Assink, M., Gubbels, J., & Boekhout van Solinge, N. F. (2018). Identifying Effective Components of Child Maltreatment Interventions: A Meta-analysis. Clinical child and family psychology review, 21(2), 171–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-017-0250-5 Waid, J., Jeanie Santaularia, N., Piescher, K., & LaLiberte, T. (2021). A latent class analysis of modifiable risk factors associated with child maltreatment re-reporting and recurrence. Child abuse & neglect, 120, 105249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105249 Wang, Q., & Chang, L. (2010). Parenting and child socialization in contemporary China. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 53–67). Oxford University Press. Wang, F., Wang, M., & Xing, X. (2018). Attitudes mediate the intergenerational transmission of corporal punishment in China. Child abuse & neglect, 76, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.003 World Health Organization. (2006). Preventing child maltreatment : a guide to taking action and generating evidence. World Health Organization and International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43499 Zhang, S., Fuller, T.L., & Nieto, M. (2013). Didn't we just see you? Time to recurrence among frequently encountered families in CPS. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 883-889. Zolotor, A. J., Theodore, A. D., Runyan, D. K., Chang, J. J., & Laskey, A. (2011). Corporal punishment and physical abuse: population‐based trends for three‐to‐11‐year‐old children in the United States. Child Abuse Review, 20, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1128 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87611 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在目前兒少保護政策下,教育基本法規範強調家外的零體罰政策,但相較於兒少於家內被體罰,囿於民法所示父母的懲戒權利,及兒童權利公約的精神,兒少保社工到底如何去看待因為管教不當或體罰而調查成為保護案件。本研究的目的是想了解兒少經通報調查成為管教不當或身體虐待之案件樣貌,以及兒少保社工如何評估上述兩類案件以及判斷的基準的差異,並整理其所提供之介入服務。本研究勾勒出兒少保社工評估管教不當或身體虐待之兒童保護案件的樣貌,以及分析兒少保社工之介入策略與服務方法。
資料來源為衛生福利部保護資訊系統中,五個直轄縣市政府的兒少保社工撰寫的個案紀錄,研究之案件為2020年12月31日止結案之個案紀錄共計815件。研究結果顯示施虐者大多為父母,且為男性比例較高。兒少被體罰原因依序為日常生活瑣事被處罰、與學校相關問題,如成績不理想及不服從管教,如頂嘴、口角爭執。手段主要以責打或傷害身體為主、並且使用工具或是徒手為之。傷勢種類以淤、挫傷最多;傷勢部位以軀幹、四肢所佔比例最高,其次為臉部及頭部。暴力嚴重程度屬於嚴重暴力較多,已屬於身體虐待範疇。父母或主要照顧者多數認為體罰兒少是合理管教,但又承認教養上有問題,並且多數不認為是兒少問題。兒少保社工在評估管教或是虐待之間、兒少的反應、暴力嚴重程度與傷勢危機狀況上有差異,另外在性別與年齡層也有顯著差異,但針對外顯傷勢、傷勢部位、受傷程度或是是否使用器具等因素沒有差別。大多數案件在安全評估多屬於「安全」範圍,於風險評估上則較多為「中」或「低」的風險狀態。 以介入服務來看,父母或主要照顧者是願意配合社工的介入,服務時間則以一年內最多。家庭服務以社工訪談服務、一般性親職教育、資源網絡連結及提供福利服務方案為主。兒少服務以就學輔導、兒少心理輔導與治療、醫療服務及陪同服務較多。施虐者服務則為父母的心理治療及治療最多,次為精神疾病治療。 研究建議:(一) 建議兒少保通報案件不要區分成管教不當及身體虐待兩種類型,兒少被體罰實質結果均屬於身體虐待範疇,不因分類不同而在服務上有所區別。(二)社工服務介入成為提供兒少保「基本款」的服務項目,仍需教育單位(學校)與醫療單位(心理輔導治療)協助。(三) 發展兒少保社工對於判斷管教不當及身體虐待的看法,以達一致性評估。最後希望結構化決策工具(SDM)進行本土化研究。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Under the current child protection policy, the Basic Education Law emphasizes the policy of zero corporal punishment outside the home. How do child protective social workers treat investigations due to improper discipline or corporal punishment as protection cases? This study aims to understand the appearance of child protection cases reported and investigated as improper discipline or physical abuse. Furthermore, how do the child protection social workers evaluate the above two types of cases and the differences in judging criteria and sort out the provided information intervention service? This study outlines the appearance of children's social workers evaluating child protection cases of improper discipline or physical abuse. It analyzes the intervention strategies and service methods of children's social workers when they provide treatment services.
The source of the data is the case records written by the child and child protection social workers of the governments of five counties and cities directly under the Central Government in the protection information system of the Ministry of Health and Welfare. The cases studied are 815 case records closed as of December 31, 2020. The study results show that most abusers are parents, and the proportion of males is relatively high. The reasons for corporal punishment of children order, being punished for trivial daily life, school-related problems, such as unsatisfactory grades, and disobedience to discipline, such as talking back and quarreling. The means are mainly beating or injuring the body and tools or bare hands. Bruises and contusions were the most common injuries; trunk and limbs accounted for the highest proportion of injuries, followed by the face and head. The severity of violence belongs to serious violence, which falls into the category of physical abuse. Most parents or primary caregivers think corporal punishment is a reasonable discipline for children. However, they admit that there are parenting problems, and most do not think it is a problem for children. There are differences in the evaluation of discipline or abuse, children's response, violence severity, and injury crisis status by social workers of children and children's insurance. In addition, there are significant differences in gender and age groups, but there are differences in apparent injuries, injury sites, and injury degrees. There was no difference in factors such as whether or not to use appliances. Most of the cases belong to the "safe" range in the safety assessment and the "medium" or "low" risk status in the risk assessment. In terms of intervention services, parents and primary caregivers are willing to cooperate with the intervention of child and child protective social workers, and the service time is at most within one year. Family services include social worker interview services, general parenting education, resource network links, and welfare service programs. Children's services include school counseling, psychological counseling and treatment, medical, and accompanying services. Parents received the most psychotherapy and treatment for abusers, followed by psychiatric treatment. Research suggestions: (1) It is suggested not to differentiate between improper discipline and physical abuse. The substantive results of corporal punishment for children and children are all in the category of physical abuse, and there is no difference in service due to different classifications. (2) The intervention of social work services has become a service item that provides the "basic fund" of child and child protection, and the assistance of academic units (schools) and medical units (psychological counseling and treatment) is still needed. (3) To develop children's social workers' views on judging improper discipline and physical abuse to achieve consistent evaluation. Finally, academia researches the Structured Decision-making Model (SDM) in future localization research. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-06-20T16:21:26Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-06-20T16:21:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
誌謝 i 中文摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究問題與背景 1 第二節 研究動機與研究範圍 11 第三節 研究目的 14 第二章 文獻探討 16 第一節 臺灣兒童保護政策的發展 16 第二節 身體虐待、管教不當與體罰 19 第三節 兒少安全與風險評估 32 第四節 臺灣兒少保處遇介入服務 36 第三章 研究方法 55 第一節 研究典範與選取之考量 55 第二節 研究問題、架構與假設 58 第三節 資料來源與抽樣方法 60 第四節 變項的操作性與測量 63 第五節 資料蒐集與分析方法 68 第六節 研究倫理 74 第四章 研究分析與發現 76 第一節 人口變項分析 76 第二節 兒少因被體罰通報兒少保護案件之樣貌 82 第三節 介入服務之分析 105 第五章 研究結論與建議 114 第一節 研究結果與討論 114 第二節 研究建議 120 第三節 研究限制 123 參考文獻 125 附錄一 138 表目錄 表1-1-1兒童少年受虐類型 6 表1-1-2 兒少保護案件-施虐者本身因素 7 表1-1-2 (續) 兒少保護案件-施虐者本身因素 8 表2-2-1 兒少保護案件-兒童本身受虐原因 21 表2-2-2 管教與虐待的區別 30 表2-3-1 風險層級與安全評估結果 35 表2-3-2 以受虐風險為基礎的繼續服務或結案指引 36 表2-4-1 兒少保護案件處遇計畫類型 43 表3-3-1 2020年結案之案件數 62 表3-4-1風險評估層級分數 66 表4-1-1-1兒少基本資料 77 表4-1-1-2 兒童年齡層、教育程度與性別交叉表 77 表4-1-1-3 家庭內家庭暴力或兒少保護通報情形 78 表4-1-2-1 父母或主要照顧者(施虐者)基本資料 79 表4-1-2-2 施虐者身分及是否為主要照顧者 80 表4-1-2-3 家庭結構與福利身分 81 表4-2-1-1 施虐者原因之複選題個數 83 表4-2-1-2 調查時由社工填寫施虐者原因 83 表4-2-1-3 兒童特殊狀況原因個數 84 表4-2-1-4 兒童特殊狀況 84 表4-2-1-5 兒少受體罰原因 85 表4-2-1-6 體罰手段 86 表4-2-1-5.1 兒少受體罰原因 86 表4-2-1-7 體罰兒少使用工具類型 87 表4-2-1-8 是否有傷勢及傷勢種類 88 表4-2-1-8.1 傷勢部位 89 表4-2-1-9 暴力嚴重程度與傷勢危機程度 89 表4-2-2-1 父母或主要照顧者(施虐者)對於體罰的看法 91 表4-2-2-2 兒少對於體罰的反應 92 表4-2-2-2.1 自保能力與年齡層卡方檢定 92 表4-2-2-3 案件類型與過度體罰與否交叉表 93 表4-2-2-4 暴力嚴重程度與是否有過度管教及體罰交叉表 94 表4-2-2-5 傷勢危機程度與是否有過度管教及體罰交叉表 95 表4-2-2-6 使用工具與否與是否有過度管教及體罰交叉表 95 表4-2-2-7 傷勢部位與過度管教體罰交叉表 96 表4-2-2-8 體罰原因與是否有過度管教及體罰交叉表 97 表4-2-3-1 受虐類型與評估因素 98 表4-2-3-1.1 案件類型與性別交叉表 99 表4-2-3-1.2 案件類型與傷勢危機度交叉表 99 表4-2-3-1.3 案件類型與暴力嚴重程度交叉表 100 表4-2-3-1.4 SDM-S安全評估與案件類型交叉列表 100 表4-2-3-1.5 案件類型與兒少反應交叉表 101 表4-2-3-1.6 體罰原因與案件類型交叉表 101 表4-2-3-1.7 體罰原因與案件類型交叉表 102 表4-2-3-2 各項因素與暴力嚴重程度交叉表 103 表4-2-3-3 身體虐待評估之羅吉斯蒂迴歸 104 表4-3-1-1 SDM評估 105 表4-3-1-2 SDMR風險程度 106 表4-3-1-2.1 SDMR風險再評估結果 106 表4-3-1-2.2 SDM安全評估及兒少通報紀錄 107 表4-3-1-2.3 暴力嚴重程度與SDM-S評估 107 表4-3-1-3 SDM風險再評估與介入項目卡方檢定 108 表4-3-1-4 父母進案後及社工介入後配合態度 109 表4-3-2-1 社工提供服務項目(家庭部分) 110 表4-3-2-2 社工提供服務項目(兒少部分) 111 表4-3-2-3 社工提供服務項目(施虐者部分) 112 表4-3-2-4 服務區間 112 表4-3-2-5 結案原因 113 圖目錄 圖 1 管教不當與身體虐待的分別 59 圖 2 資料蒐集過程 68 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 從「體罰」的概念看兒少保護案件: 身體虐待乎?管教不當乎? | zh_TW |
dc.title | A review of child protective services cases from a perspective of corporal punishment: Is it physical abuse or improper discipline? | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳毓文;游美貴;吳書昀;林敬軒 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Wen Chen;Mei-Kuei Yu;Shu-Yun Wu;Ching-Hsuan Lin | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 身體虐待,管教不當,體罰,介入服務, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | physical abuse,improper discipline,corporal punishment,intervention services, | en |
dc.relation.page | 140 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300439 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-18 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學系 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-06-30 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.2 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。