Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72083
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 季昭華 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Ying Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳珈瑩 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T06:22:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-22 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adams, N.J., Farnworth, M.J., Rickett, J., Parker, K.A., Cockrem, J.F., 2011. Behavioural and corticosterone responses to capture and confinement of wild blackbirds (Turdus merula). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 134, 246-255.
Aviva, P., Carcoline, S. 2014. Developing prognostic scores. In Medical Statistics at a Glance (Wiley-Blackwell), 138-141. Axelrod, J., Reisine, T.D., 1984. Stress hormones: their interaction and regulation. Science 224, 452-459. Beaufrère, H. 2016. Medical, Nursing, and Cosmetic Procedures, In: Samour, J. (Ed.) Avian medicine. Elsevier Missouri, 204-245. Best, D., Mullineaux, E. 2003. Basic principles of treating wildlife casualties, In: Mullineaux, E., Best, D., Copper, J.E. (Eds.) BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualites. BSAVA Publications, Gloucester, 6-28. Brasmer, T.H., Piermattei, D.L., 1984. The acutely traumatized small animal patient, Vol 2. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 45-54. Brodbelt, D.C., Blissitt, K.J., Hammond, R.A., Neath, P.J., Young, L.E., Pfeiffer, D.U., Wood, J.L.N., 2008. The risk of death: the Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Small Animal Fatalities. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 35, 365-373. Burroughs, A.K., Sabin, C.A., Rolles, K., Delvart, V., Karam, V., Buckels, J., O'Grady, J.G., Castaing, D., Klempnauer, J., Jamieson, N., 2006. 3-month and 12-month mortality after first liver transplant in adults in Europe: predictive models for outcome. The Lancet 367, 225-232. Celinski, M., Jonas, M., 2004. Scoring systems in the ICU. Surgery-Oxford International Edition 22, 94-96. Champion, H.R., Sacco, W.J., Carnazzo, A.J., Copes, W., Fouty, W.J., 1981. Trauma score. Critical care medicine 9, 672-676. Champion, H.R., Sacco, W.J., Copes, W.S., Gann, D.S., Gennarelli, T.A., Flanagan, M.E., 1989. A revision of the Trauma Score. The Journal of trauma 29, 623-629. Chatterji, C., Raj, A., 2011. Intensive care unit scoring systems. Apollo Medicine 8, 89-93. Cousquer, G., 2005. First aid and emergency care for the avian casualty. In practice 27, 190-203. Dickens, M.J., Earle, K.A., Romero, L.M., 2009. Initial transference of wild birds to captivity alters stress physiology. General and Comparative Endocrinology 160, 76-83. Doneley, B. 2012. Comparative Avian Anatomy and Physiology: Why Are Birds Different? . In: WSAVA/FECAVA/BSAVA World Congress Doneley, B. 2016a. Clinical Techniques, In: Doneley, B. (Ed.) Avian Medicine and Surgery in Practice: Companion and Aviary Birds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 81-94. Doneley, B. 2016b. Supportive Therapy, In: Doneley, B. (Ed.) Avian Medicine and Surgery in Practice: Companion and Aviary Birds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 145-150. Doneley, R. 2016c. The Clinical Examination, In: Samour, J. (Ed.) Avian medicine. Elsevier Missouri, 49-72. Fecteau, G., Pare, J., Van Metre, D.C., Smith, B.P., Holmberg, C.A., Guterbock, W., Jang, S., 1997. Use of a clinical sepsis score for predicting bacteremia in neonatal dairy calves on a calf rearing farm. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 38, 101. Goldsworthy, S., P. Gales, R., Giese, M., Brothers, N., 2000. Effects of the Iron Baron oil spill on little penguins (Eudyptula minor). I. Estimates of mortality, Vol 27, 559-571 pp. Grahm, J.E. 2016. Hemorrhage, In: Grahm, J.E. (Ed.) Blackewll's Five-minite Veterinary Consult: Avian.Oxford, UK, 134-136. Harrison, G.J., Ritchie, B.W. 1994. Making Distinctions In The Physical Examination, In: Avian Medicine: Principles And Application. Wingers Publishing, Florida, 144-175. Hayes, G., Mathews, K., Doig, G., Kruth, S., Boston, S., Nykamp, S., Poljak, Z., Dewey, C., 2010. The Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE) Score: A Severity of Illness Stratification System for Hospitalized Dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 24, 1034-1047. Hayes, G., Mathews, K., Doig, G., Kruth, S., Boston, S., Nykamp, S., Poljak, Z., Dewey, C., 2011. The Feline Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (Feline APPLE) Score: a severity of illness stratification system for hospitalized cats. J Vet Intern Med 25, 26-38. Heard, D. 2016. Anesthesia. In Current Therapy in Avian Medicine and Surgery, Speer, B.L., ed. ( Missouri, ELSEVIER), 601-613. Hosmer Jr, D.W., Lemeshow, S., Sturdivant, R.X. 2013. Model-Building Strategies and Methods for Logistic Regression, In: Applied Logistic Regression. 89-152. Jain, S., Mansfield, B., Wilcox, M.H., 1999. Subcutaneous fluid administration – better than the intravenous approach? Journal of Hospital Infection 41, 269-272. Johnson, T. 2014. Take a Number: Trauma Scoring Systems In: Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 2014 Spring Symposium Hawaii. Jolly, M. 2015. Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury in Morepork Owls: A Review of Diagnostic and Treatment Options In: AAVAC-UPAV, 31-39. Kelly, A., Halstead, C., Hunter, D., Leighton, K., Grogan, A., Harris, M., 2011. Factors affecting the likelihood of release of injured and orphaned woodpigeons (Columba palumbus), Vol 20, 523-534 pp. King, A., McLelland, J., 1989. Form and Function in Birds, Vol 4. Academic Press, San Diego. King, L.G., Stevens, M.T., Ostro, E.N.S., Phil, D.D.M., Shankar, J.R., 1994. A Model For Prediction Of Survival In Critically III Dogs. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 4, 85-99. King, L.G., Wohl, J.S., Manning, A.M., Hackner, S.G., Raffe, M.R., Maislin, G., 2001. Evaluation of the survival prediction index as a model of risk stratification for clinical research in dogs admitted to intensive care units at four locations. American journal of veterinary research 62, 948-954. Kirby, R. 1991. Approach to the trauma patient. In: Proceedings, 15. Kirkwood, J. 2003. Introduction: wildlife casualties and the veterinary surgeon, In: Mullineaux, E., Best, R., Cooper, J.E. (Eds.) BASAVA Wildlife Casualties. British Small Animal Veterinary Association, Gloucester, 1-5. Kirkwood, J., Best, R., 1998. Treatment and rehabilitation of wildlife casualties: legal and ethical aspects. In Practice 20, 214-216. Knaus, W.A., Draper, E.A., Wagner, D.P., Zimmerman, J.E., 1985. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical care medicine 13, 818-829. Knaus, W.A., Zimmerman, J.E., Wagner, D.P., Draper, E.A., Lawrence, D.E., 1981. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Critical care medicine 9, 591-597. Lichtenberger, M., 2004. Principles of shock and fluid therapy in special species. Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine 13, 142-153. Marla, L., Connie, O., Carolyn, C., H., T.D., Daniel, D., Cheryl, P., Lori, M., Rebecca, K., 2009. Comparison of fluid types for resuscitation after acute blood loss in mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 19, 467-472. Meredith, A. 2016. Wildlife triage and discion-making, In: Mullineaux, E., Keeble, E. (Eds.) BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. BSAVA publications, Glousceter, 27-36. Miller, E.A.M. 2012. Minimum Standards for wildlife rehabilitation, Miller, E.A.M., ed. (Minnesota, National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association and International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council). Molina-López, R.A., Casal, J., Darwich, L., 2015. Prognostic indicators associated with early mortality of wild raptors admitted to a wildlife rehabilitation centre in Spain. Veterinary Quarterly 35, 9-15. Molony, S., Baker, P., Garland, L., Cuthill, I., Harris, S., 2007. Factors that can be used to predict release rates for wildlife casualties. Animal Welfare-Potters Bar Then Wheathampstead 16, 361. Morgan, K.N., Tromborg, C.T., 2007. Sources of stress in captivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102, 262-302. Mullineaux, E., Keeble, E. 2016. First aid and emergency care, In: 2 (Ed.) BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. British Small animal Veterinary Association, Gloucester. Peterson, K.L., Hardy, B.T., Hall, K., 2013. Assessment of shock index in healthy dogs and dogs in hemorrhagic shock. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 23, 545-550. Platt, S.R., Radaelli, S.T., McDonnell, J.J., 2001. The prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Coma Scale in head trauma in dogs. Journal of veterinary internal medicine 15, 581-584. Quesenberry, K.E., Hillyer, E.V. 1994. Supportive Care and Emergency Therapy, In: Ritchie, B.W., Harrison, G.J., Harrison, L.R. (Eds.) Avian Medicine: Principles and Application. Wingers Publishing, Inc., Florida, 145-174. Riley, J., Barron, H., 2016a. Wildlife emergency and critical care. Veterinary Clinics: Exotic Animal Practice 19, 613-626. Riley, J., Barron, H., 2016b. Wildlife Emergency and Critical Care. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 19, 613-626. Rockar, R.A., Drobatz, K.S., Shofer, F.S., 1994. Development of a scoring system for the veterinary trauma patient. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 4, 77-83. Scott, D.E. 2016a. Fluid Therapy and Treatments In: Scott, D.E. (Ed.) Raptor Medicine, Surgery, and Rehabilitation. CABI, Boston, 81-96. Scott, D.E. 2016b. Handling and Phusical Examination, In: Scott, D.E. (Ed.) Raptor Medicine, Surgery, and Rehabilitation. CABI, Boston, 1-10. Sharp, B.E., 1996. Post-release survival of oiled, cleaned seabirds in North America. Ibis 138, 222-228. Smith, A.E., 2018. Prediction Factors for Release of Wildlife at a Midwestern Rehabilitation Facility. Steinohrt, L.A., 1999. Avian fluid therapy. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, 83-91. Teasdale, G., Jennett, B., 1974. Assessment of Coma and Impaired Consciousness: A Practical Scale, The Lancet 304, 81-84. Thomas, D.R., Cote, T.R., Lawhorne, L., Levenson, S.A., Rubenstein, L.Z., Smith, D.A., Stefanacci, R.G., Tangalos, E.G., Morley, J.E., Council, D., 2008. Understanding clinical dehydration and its treatment. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 9, 292-301. Williams, D.L., 2012. The avian eye. Ophthalmology of Exotic Pets, 119-158. Yaakov, D.R., Rosenthal, K.L., Golder, F.J., Shofer, F.S. 2007. What is the Mortality Rate of Anesthetized Birds? . In: International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium Orieana. 台北市獸醫師公會。2017。獸醫診療機構診療費用標準。台北市獸醫師公會。http://www.tpvma.org.tw/laws.php。 胡瑜。2018。落難動物的重生之路——野生動物救傷募資計畫。嘖嘖。https://www.zeczec.com/projects/rescuewildlife 季昭華。2017。106年度北台灣野生動物急救保育及疾病研究暨台灣獼猴內視鏡結紮計畫期末報告。未發表資料。 邵文逸。2006。實証醫學中的統計原理。醫療爭議審議報導 : 爭審案例討論暨相關論述。行政院衛生署。台北市。 哈多吉。2013.。創傷嚴重度指標計算方式之比較—國內外文獻回顧。中華緊急救護技術員協會醫誌。第3期。第25-31頁。 蔣功國。2018。 2017救傷分析。冠羽。第282期。第41-43頁。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/72083 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 野生動物救傷的最終目的在於幫助野生動物康復並返回野外,然而,在野鳥入院後的48小時,具有很高的死亡率,為了幫助獸醫師評估剛入院患禽的生理狀態,並給予治療建議,本研究針對入院時所進行的初步評估項目,與入院後48小時的死亡率進行分析,期建立一個初期檢傷系統,並分析不同治療方式與死亡率的差異,以提高傷救的成功率。
本研究於2016年十月至2018年八月間,共分析200隻野鳥,於入院時記錄鳥種、年齡以及身體體態指數、呼吸次數、心跳次數、意識狀態、黏膜顏色、拉皮測試、微血管回充時間、創傷等級等八個理學檢查項目。以及48小時內對該患禽所進行的醫療處置及最後結果。所有野鳥分為161隻的訓練樣本及39隻的驗證樣本,將訓練樣本以邏輯斯回歸進行分析,得到野鳥檢傷分數,並以此得到預估的死亡率。訓練樣本中每個個體的野鳥檢體以野鳥檢傷分數進行排序後,以四分位數進行分組,再利用卡方檢定比較分數相近下,不同處置間的結果是否有顯著差異。 透過回歸分析,本研究發現心跳速率、意識狀態、黏膜顏色與野鳥入院48小時死亡率有關,可利用回歸係數得到野鳥檢傷分數(Wild bird triage score, WST)公式,WST=0.451*(心跳分數)+0.794*(意識狀態分數)+0.513*(黏膜顏色分數)-2.909 (P<0.05),由此分數預估救傷野鳥在入院後48小時的死亡率之公式為P(死亡率)=eWTS/(1+ eWTS ),並可得到分數與死亡率之對照表,分數越高代表死亡率越高。本系統之接收者特徵曲線下面積(area under the curve, AUC)為0.729,達到可接受標準。經過Youden指數輔助,在切點等於-1.4940時,敏感度為67.4%及特異度為70.3%,其陽性似然比為2.30。 將卡方檢定的結果顯示在分數較低的組別中,不同處置間的結果並沒有顯著差異,只有分數最高的第四組具有顯著差異,在該組中,上針給予輸夜的組別死亡率低於皮下給予的組別。 本研究所提出的三項因子:心跳速率、意識狀態、黏膜顏色,分別包含了循環系統及神經系統的評估,與過去人類醫學及小動物急診加護所提出的檢傷系統相類似。過去的野生動物救傷文獻中,也建議野生動物入院後首要被評估的系統應為心血管系統,在相關鳥類的動物實驗中也顯示失血會導致心跳的速率改變。本研究結果與過去野鳥救傷長期預後因子的研究結果有所不同,顯示在野鳥救傷的不同階段,需要不同面向的評估。而治療策略的比較則顯示在嚴重程度較高的組別中,上針給予輸液也許可以幫助死亡率的降低。 本研究嘗試建立一完整的野鳥檢傷系統,以期提供一個非侵入性並可快速取得資料的指標,幫助臨床醫師預測野鳥在入院初期的死亡率,並給予相對應的治療建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | To overcome high mortality rate encountered in wild bird rescue and achieve early prediction of prognosis, establishing a triage system and management criteria for birds is mandatory. A scoring system was set up to evaluate the outcomes of different levels of stabilization managements under different patient factors.
Signalment and physical examination parameters including body condition score, heart rate, respiratory rate, mentation, severity of symptoms and hydration state of 200 rescued birds from several wildlife rescue facilities were collected from October, 2016 to August, 2018. Prognosis and stabilization manner based on invasiveness including overnight stabilization, oxygen support, subcutaneous (SQ) fluid therapy and intravenous(IV) or intraosseous(IO) fluid therapy during the first 48-hour-hospitalization were also recorded. The Wild Bird Triage Score was set up by logistic regression analysis to predict mortality of the first 48 hours. Chi-Square Tests was performed to compare result of different management in similar score. Logistic regression model indicates the heart rate score, tenting skin score and mucus membrane color score have positive correlation with mortality rate (P<0.05). The model was tested for receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve was 0.729, with 67.4% sensitivity, 70.3% specificity at the cut-off point -1.4049 The positive likelihood was 2.30. The result of Chi-Square Tests demonstrate no significant differences in the first second and third class, while significant differences are noted in the fourth class. In the fourth class, the average mortality of IV/IO class are lower than SQ class, The three factors are related to cardiovascular system and neurological system, similar to previous literatures of human and small animal medicine. Therefore, evaluation of cardiovascular system and neurological system should be the first priority after animal admission. In a previous study, mallard ducks showed heart rate alternation after acute hemorrhage. These risk factors were not investigated in previous wild bird prognostic indicators studies. It emphasized different rehabilitation stages may require different assessments. As for therapy strategy, intravenous or intraosseous fluid therapies could reduce mortality rate in patients of different severity, while subcutaneous fluid therapy is more appropriate for patient of medial severity. The study established a general wild bird triage score system which offered a guild line based on non-invasive and rapidly assessable examinations. Apply to the scoring system, clinicians can estimate the first-48-hour mortality rate of hospitalized wild birds and provide appropriate treatments. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T06:22:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04643004-1.pdf: 2656405 bytes, checksum: 44c8ebedfee588b884a0cf8bd3abab71 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝………………………………………………………………………………………i
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………….ii Abastract………………………………………………………………………………...iv 目錄………………………………………………………………………………….vi 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………………viii 表目錄………………………………………………………………………………......ix 第一章 前言…………………………………………………………………………….1 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………….2 第一節 臺灣鳥類救傷現況…………………………………………………...2 第二節 野鳥救傷決策流程…………………………………………………...3 第三節 野鳥的理學檢查以及急救穩定……………………………………...5 第四節 野鳥救傷預後研究………………………………………………….10 第五節 建立預後分數的研究……………………………………………….12 第六節 人類醫學與小動物急診檢傷評分系統回顧……………………….16 第三章 材料方法……………………………………………………………………...19 第一節 研究對象與資料蒐集……………………………………………...19 第二節 研究材料…………………………………………………………...21 第三節 檢傷表格設計……………………………………………………...22 第四節 實驗流程…………………………………………………………...27 第五節 統計分析…………………………………………………………...28 第四章 結果…………………………………………………………………………...30 第一節 救傷野鳥整體分析…..……………………………………………...30 第二節 邏輯斯回歸分析…………………………………………………….39 第三節 野鳥檢傷分數系統表現…………………………………………….41 第四節 不同處置方式與死亡率的關係分析……………………………….47 第五章 討論………………………………………………………………………...…56 第一節 救傷野鳥總體分布………………………………………………….56 第二節 野鳥檢傷分數與其它預後文獻結果比較………………………….58 第三節 野鳥檢傷分數與其他物種急診加護檢傷系統比較……………….60 第四節 評估檢傷系統設計及偏差討論………………………………..….63 第五節 不同處置方式對死亡率的關係討論……………………..………...65 第六章 結論…………………………………………………………………………...67 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………….68 附錄…………………………………………………………………………………….75 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建立臺灣野鳥救傷在初步穩定時期之檢傷分數及處置建議模型 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Development of Triage Score and Management Criteria during Initial Stabilization in Taiwan Wild Bird Rescues | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林中天,余品奐 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 檢傷,評分系統,野鳥,救傷,野生動物醫學,保育醫學, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Triage,scoring system,wild bird,rescue,wildlife medicine,conservation medicine, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201804000 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 獸醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床動物醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
Appears in Collections: | 臨床動物醫學研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf Restricted Access | 2.59 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.