請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61015
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎 | |
dc.contributor.author | Huai-Hsien Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王懷賢 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:41:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Homburg, V. (2005). The information ecology of e-government : e-government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration. . Washington, DC: IOS Press.
Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lokkesmoe, K. J. (2002). What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: The Case of Problem Formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 568-584. Capgemini. (2005). Study on stakeholder requirements for pan-European eGovernment Services. End of phase 1 report(version 1.1). Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1993). Limits to interfirm coordination through information technology: Results of a field study in consumer goods packaging distribution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 73-95. Cordella, A. (2007). e-Government towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of information Technology, 22(3), 265-274. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1997). Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success:A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19(4), 9-30. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Thinler, J. (2006). Digital era governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. London: Sage Publications. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1-21. Gartner. (2007). A Majority of e-Government Initiatives Fail or Fall Short of Expectations. San Diego: Gartner, Inc's Executive Programs. Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business and Stakeholder Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53-73. Hague, B. N., & Loader, B. (1999). Digital Democracy:Discourse and and Decision Making in the Information Age. London: Routledge. Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering Work:Don't Automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 104-113. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management For All Seasons? . Public Administration 69(1), 3-19. Klischewski, R., & Scholl, H. J. (2007). Information Quality as a Common Ground for Key Players in e-Government Integration and Interoperability Paper presented at the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Kauai, Hawaii. Mahmood, M., & Mann, G. (1993). Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 97-122. Mason, R. O. (1978). Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information & Management, 1(4), 219-234. McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean's model. . Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24-45. Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2010). Alignment 2.0 Strategic use of new internet technologies in government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 112-121. Moore, M., & Khagram, S. (2004). On Creating Public Value:What Business Might Learn from Government about Strategic Management. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper, 3. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press. Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (1997). A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: toward a theory for information systems assessment. Information Resources Management Journal, 10(1), 6-25. OECD. (2003). The e-Government Imperative Palis: OECD. Pestoff, V. A. (2005). Beyond the Market and State: Social Enterprises and Civil Democracy in a Welfare Society. Ashgate. Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46, 159-166. Phillips, B. S. (1971). Social Research: Strategy and Tactics. (Second Edition). New York, NY: Macmillan. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50-69. Raus, M., Liu, J., & Kipp, A. (2010). Evaluating IT innovations in a business-to-government context: A framework and its applications. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 122-133. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8(3), 240-253. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana,IL: University of Illinois Press. Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your Case Study: A Guide for Students and Researchers: SAGE Publications. Torkzadeh, G., & Doll, W. J. (1999). The development of a tool for measuring perceived impact of information technology on work. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science, 27(3), 327-339. Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success : A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 711-733. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods: SAGE Publications. Young, D., & Benamati, J. (2000). Differences in public Web sites: The current state of large U.S. firms. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 1(3). 行政院研究發展考核委員會. (2007). 優質網路政府計畫(97年至100年). 李政宗. (2013). 強化國家資產管理,提升運用效益─淺談國有公用不動產活化. 當代財政, 28, 1-9. 李國田. (2010). 政府資訊改造與節能. 研考雙月刊34卷第4期, 61-67. 財政部國有財產局. (2011). 財政部國有財產局50週年紀念專刊. 財政部國有財產局. 張玲星, 游佳萍, & 洪智源. (2010). 台灣電子化政府資訊系統的挑戰—利益關係人觀點. 資訊管理學報, 17(2), 201-231. 關貿網路股份有限公司. (2012). 財政部國有財產局國有公用財產管理系統網路版系統操作使用手冊【一般使用者】 關貿網路股份有限公司. (2013). 財政部國有財產署國有公用財產管理系統網路版初值建置操作手冊. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61015 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年我國政府積極發展電子化政府,於第三階段之優質網路政府計畫中,希
望透過內部資訊改造、系統共用等方式提高整體資訊資源使用效率。也因此財政部國有財產署於95年起,開始推動國有公用財產管理系統(線上版)之開發建置,希望透過統一開發公用財產管理系統的方式降低整體成本,同時公用財產資訊也可透過此系統便利地傳至線上傳輸系統,達成即時、全面性的公用財產資料蒐集,但系統於99年上線後推廣至今已出現瓶頸:無法繼續增加使用機關數,以至於預期的成本節省效益增進管理效能效益大打折扣。 本研究從電子化政府及資訊系統成功模型兩個領域進行文獻探討後,以DeLone and McLean (2003)發表之D&M資訊系統成功模型為基礎,輔以利益關係人、策略三角形的概念,對個案進行深入分析,期能找出財網系統發展瓶頸之原因、及可能改善建議,同時對D&M資訊系統於G2G(Government-to-Government)背景的使用上進行驗證。 研究結果發現,個案系統發展瓶頸,源於(1)資源的缺乏,預算不足也無法令之強制力,推行不易、(2)系統面功能不完整、(3)因開發時間過晚,各機關之既有系統造成的轉移成本高,導致使用意願低。為解決此瓶頸,本研究建議國產署考量授權階級需求,爭取更多資源及法令上的協助,或適度增加系統之開放性、鬆綁管理規定,滿足使用者功能需求以增加採用意願。未來其他政府機關在進行電子化政府系統規劃時,也應思考系統之預期效益、考量各利害關係人之需求後,始進行系統之設計及可行性之評估。在D&M資訊系統成功模型於G2G背景的驗證上,本研究發現構面間的關聯存在,但也建議其他研究者可進行量化研究方法之驗證,期能促進D&M資訊系統成功模型於公部門系統領域之應用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Taiwan government has tried to catch up the trend of eGovernment. In the third stage of eGovernment plan, they tried to saving the total IT cost through the IT infrastructure reengineering and resource sharing. Thus, National Property Administration has started to build the National Public Property Management System from 1996. By building this common and sharing system, they intended to saving the cost of maintain and development and also reached a more promptly and complete data collecting process. The system was launched in 2010 and was adopted by a few departments. But now, they meet a problem. They can’t keep promoting this system to more departments. Due to the lack of usage, the intended benefit is not fully realized.
After reviewing the literature of eGovernment and information system success model, Delone and McLean IT Success Model was chose as the main research model. This research was conducted to not only figure out the problem and the possible solution but try to validate the usage of Delone and McLean IT Success Model in the context of G2G(Government-to-Government) system. The research result shows that the problem origins from three aspect:(1)The lack of resource and authority、(2) The incompleteness of the system function、(3) The switching cost from existing system. To break this situation, we suggest National Property Administration to more consider the need of the authority to gain more support and resource. Or they can raise the openness of the system to meet the needs of function. In the future, government should pay more attention to the needs of stakeholder and clarify the intended benefit before the construction of one system. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:41:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00725022-1.pdf: 1660153 bytes, checksum: cd097394fe378f2c32175211d752e50f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景及研究動機 1 1.2 研究個案及研究目標 2 第2章 文獻探討 3 2.1 電子化政府 3 2.1.1 電子化政府興起背景 3 2.1.2 電子化政府思維的演進 4 2.1.3 台灣電子化政府發展現況 8 2.2 資訊系統成功模型 10 2.2.1 D&M資訊系統成功模型 10 2.2.2 D&M資訊系統成功模型修正版 12 2.2.3 資訊系統成功模型應用 13 第3章 研究方法與架構 16 3.1 研究方法 16 3.2 研究理論與架構 18 3.3 研究個案背景 19 3.3.1 國產署設立意義及組織的沿革 19 3.3.2 國產署施政目標 22 3.3.3 國產署資訊現況介紹 23 第4章 研究分析與建議 26 4.1 財網系統個案發展過程 26 4.1.1 開發背景 26 4.1.2 系統的意義 27 4.1.3 財網建置過程 29 4.1.4 財網系統現況 37 4.2 D&M資訊系統成功模型分析 39 4.2.1 財網系統定位及預期效益 40 4.2.2 系統品質與使用意願 41 4.2.3 服務品質與使用意願/使用滿意度 43 4.2.4 使用意願 44 4.2.5 使用與淨效益 48 4.2.6 小結 54 4.3 利害關係人、策略三角形分析 58 4.3.1 利害關係人分析 59 4.3.2 策略三角形分析 63 4.4 討論與建議 66 第5章 結論 72 參考文獻 76 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 電子化政府資訊系統成功模型之研究-以財政部國產署為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Research of the Success Model of eGovernment System: A Case Study of National Property Administration | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝冠雄,吳玲玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 電子化政府,D&M資訊系統成功模型,利害關係人模型,公部門策略三角形,國有財產管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | eGovenment,D&M IT Success Model,Stakeholder Model,Public Strategic Triangle,National Property Administration, | en |
dc.relation.page | 80 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.62 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。