請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59360
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林淑文(Shu-Wen Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jia-An Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪佳安 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:21:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-28 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-28 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-06-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Wiedenmayer K, Summers RS, Mackie CA, Everard M, Tromp D. Developing pharmacy practice - A focus on patient care. Netherlands: World Health Organization and International Pharmaceutical Federation; 2006.
2. 顧記華、沈麗娟、陳基旺、何蘊芳、林慧玲. 臺灣六年制藥學教育的創建. 台灣醫學. 2016;20(1):27-32. 3. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會. 醫院評鑑基準及評量項目-急性一般病床100床以上. Available at: http://www.jct.org.tw/FrontStage/index.aspx. Accessed 3/16, 2017. 4. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會. 醫院評鑑基準及評量項目-急性一般病床99床以下. Available at: http://www.jct.org.tw/FrontStage/index.aspx. Accessed 3/16, 2017. 5. 全國法規資料庫. 藥品優良臨床試驗準則. Available at: http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=L0030056. Accessed 3/16, 2017. 6. 全國法規資料庫. 藥師法. Available at: http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=L0030066. Accessed 3/16, 2017. 7. 林慧玲、許光陽、闕壯卿、李安榮、簡伯武、高雅慧、蔡義弘、張建雄、魏道昌、陳基旺. 2005 年台灣藥學教育白皮書. 醫學教育. 2006;10(3):165-85. 8. Beringer P. Remington: the science and practice of pharmacy. 21 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. 9. Kaboli PJ, Hoth AB, McClimon BJ, Schnipper JL. Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. May 08 2006;166(9):955-64. 10. Chisholm-Burns MA, Kim Lee J, Spivey CA, et al. US pharmacists' effect as team members on patient care: systematic review and meta-analyses. Med Care. Oct 2010;48(10):923-33. 11. Gallagher J, McCarthy S, Byrne S. Economic evaluations of clinical pharmacist interventions on hospital inpatients: a systematic review of recent literature. Int J Clin Pharm. Dec 2014;36(6):1101-14. 12. Touchette DR, Doloresco F, Suda KJ, et al. Economic evaluations of clinical pharmacy services: 2006-2010. Pharmacotherapy. Aug 2014;34(8):771-93. 13. 陳芳婷、李浩銓、王郁青、李炳鈺. 藥師介入服務提升住院用藥安全. 藥學雜誌. 2014;30(1):55-60. 14. 莊美華、李紀慧、林俊龍. 藥師減少可預防性用藥疏失所扮演之角色. 慈濟醫學. 2005;17(Suppl 4):29-34. 15. 吳家瑋、康皓程、林欣儀、吳宜真、黃織芬、王繼娟、林淑文、林慧玲、沈麗娟、林綺珊. 臺灣藥師抗凝血門診服務. 臺灣臨床藥學雜誌. 2016;24(2):81-5. 16. 譚延輝、蔡富雄、王建贏、李煥文、賴香螢. 漫談臺灣社區藥師執行判斷性服務的臨床效益. 臺灣臨床藥學雜誌. 2016;24(1):59-72. 17. 譚延輝、郭錦璋、回德仁. 藥師對一般外科病患提供藥事照顧之探討. 醫學研究. 1998;18(6):376-89. 18. 林慧玲. 臺灣藥學教育之發展現況. 醫療品質. 2013;7(2):11-8. 19. 林慧玲、林淑文、何蘊芳、沈麗娟. 六年制藥學系課程設計的理念與原則:以醫院藥學為例. 台灣醫學. 2016;20(1):33-9. 20. Prideaux D. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Curriculum design. BMJ. Feb 01 2003;326(7383):268-70. 21. 國立臺灣大學. 國立臺灣大學藥學系. Available at: http://rx.mc.ntu.edu.tw/myDOP/SCENE/CURRICULUM/maincurriculum.php?rub=curriculum//1. Accessed 12/28, 2016. 22. 國立臺灣大學. 臺大課程地圖. Available at: http://coursemap.aca.ntu.edu.tw/course_map_all/class.php?code=4030. Accessed 12/28, 2016. 23. Anderson HM, Anaya G, Bird E, Moore DL. A Review of Educational Assessment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005;69(1):84-100. 24. Accreditation Standards and Key Elements for The Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to The Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. Chicago, Illinois: Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education; 2015. 25. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. Sep 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63-7. 26. 李石增、史青平、朱宗藍等. 臨床能力評量指引. 第二版 ed: 台灣愛思唯爾; 2013. 27. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. Jan 25 2007;356(4):387-96. 28. Pittenger AL, Chapman SA, Frail CK, Moon JY, Undeberg MR, Orzoff JH. Entrustable Professional Activities for Pharmacy Practice. Am J Pharm Educ. May 25 2016;80(4):57. 29. Kelley KA, McAuley JW, Wallace LJ, Frank SG. Curricular mapping: process and product. Am J Pharm Educ. Oct 15 2008;72(5):100. 30. Armayor GM, Leonard ST. Graphic strategies for analyzing and interpreting curricular mapping data. Am J Pharm Educ. Jun 15 2010;74(5). 31. 王嘉陵. 臺灣高等教育課程地圖繪製之反思. 教育研究與發展期刊. 2011;7(2):57-79. 32. Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Med Teach. Mar 2001;23(2):123-37. 33. Plaza CM, Draugalis JR, Slack MK, Skrepnek GH, Sauer KA. Curriculum mapping in program assessment and evaluation. Am J Pharm Educ. Apr 15 2007;71(2):20. 34. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet. Mar 24 2001;357(9260):945-9. 35. Boyce EG. Finding and using readily available sources of assessment data. Am J Pharm Educ. Oct 15 2008;72(5):1-10. 36. 國立臺灣大學醫學院藥學專業學院. 進階藥學實習手冊. 初版 ed. 臺北市; 2015. 37. 臺灣大學藥學院藥學系、臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院藥劑部. 國立臺灣大學藥學院藥學系 - 藥學實習暨調劑學實習手冊; 2014. 38. Scott DM, Friesner DL, Miller DR. Pharmacy students' perceptions of their preparedness to provide pharmaceutical care. Am J Pharm Educ. Feb 10 2010;74(1):8. 39. Sumpradit N, Suttajit S, Hunnangkul S, Wisaijohn T, Putthasri W. Comparison of self-reported professional competency across pharmacy education programs: a survey of Thai pharmacy graduates enrolled in the public service program. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014;5:347-57. 40. Crawford SY, Awe C, Tawk RH, Simon Pickard A. A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Study of Pharmacy Student Perceptions of Readiness to Serve Diverse Populations. Am J Pharm Educ. May 25 2016;80(4):62. 41. Kairuz T, Noble C, Shaw J. Preceptors, interns, and newly registered pharmacists' perceptions of New Zealand pharmacy graduates' preparedness to practice. Am J Pharm Educ. Aug 10 2010;74(6):108. 42. Hill LH, Kirkwood CK. Student and preceptor perception of performance in advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005;69(4):63. 43. Kirkpatrick MAF, Pugh CB. Assessment of Curricular Competency Outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;65:217-24. 44. Whelan AM, Mansour S, Farmer P, Yung D. Moving from a lecture-based to a problem-based learning curriculum-perceptions of preparedness for practice. Pharmacy Education. 2007;7(3):239-47. 45. Donovan JL, Kanaan AO, Silva MA, Horton E, Abel C, Belliveau PP. Assessment of center for the advancement of pharmaceutical education (CAPE) outcomes in a capstone course of an accelerated pharmacy program. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2011;3(4):299-306. 46. Zelenitsky S, Vercaigne L, Davies NM, Davis C, Renaud R, Kristjanson C. Using curriculum mapping to engage faculty members in the analysis of a pharmacy program. Am J Pharm Educ. Sep 15 2014;78(7):139. 47. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997. 48. 蔣立琦、郭雅雯、林綽娟. 自我效能之概念分析. 護理雜誌. 2004;51(2):67-72. 49. Artino Jr AR. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ. May 2012;1(2):76-85. 50. Artino Jr AR, Hemmer PA, Durning SJ. Using self-regulated learning theory to understand the beliefs, emotions, and behaviors of struggling medical students. Academic Medicine. 2011;86(10):S35-S8. 51. Hendry GD, Ginns P. Readiness for self-directed learning: validation of a new scale with medical students. Med Teach. Oct 2009;31(10):918-20. 52. Opacic DA. The relationship between self-efficacy and student physician assistant clinical performance. Journal of Allied Health. 2003;32(3):158-66. 53. 朱宗信. 住院醫師教育的六大核心能力. 第二版 ed: 台灣醫學教育學會; 2014. 54. Artino Jr AR, Dong T, DeZee KJ, et al. Development and initial validation of a survey to assess students' self-efficacy in medical school. Mil Med. Sep 2012;177(9 Suppl):31-7. 55. Young HN, Hwang MJ, Dilworth TJ, Mott D, Cox ED, Moreno MA. Development and evaluation of an instrument to measure community pharmacists' self-efficacy beliefs about communicating with Spanish-speaking patients. Res Social Adm Pharm. Dec 2011;7(4):330-7. 56. Martin BA, Chui MA, Thorpe JM, Mott DA, Kreling DH. Development of a scale to measure pharmacists' self-efficacy in performing medication therapy management services. Res Social Adm Pharm. Jun 2010;6(2):155-61. 57. Dahl JR, Hall AM. A scale to measure pharmacy students' self-efficacy in performing medication therapy management services. Am J Pharm Educ. Nov 12 2013;77(9):191. 58. Alsharif NZ, Roche VF, Qi Y. Students' Perception of Self-Efficacy Following Medicinal Chemistry Skills Laboratory Exercises. Am J Pharm Educ. Jun 25 2016;80(5):76. 59. 徐麗珍、黃淑萍. 從藥師七大核心能力談實證醫學的臨床應用. 教研創新季刊. 2012(2):12-3. 60. ASHP Statement on Pharmaceutical Care. Available at: https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/policy-guidelines/docs/statements-pharmaceutical-care.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2017. 61. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research: Sage; 2002. 62. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents; 2006:307-37. 63. Maibach EW, Murphy DA. Self-efficacy in health promotion research and practice: conceptualization and measurement. Health education research. 1995;10(1):37-50. 64. 梁淑媛、蔡秀鸞、莊宇慧、吳淑芳、童恆新、王采芷、李慧貞. 淺談自我效能信念及測量工具. 馬偕護理雜誌. 2013;7(2):7-11. 65. DeVellis RF, 邱皓政(譯). 量表編制-理論與應用. 臺北市: 五南圖書; 2010. 66. 葉重新. 教育研究法. 臺北市: 心理; 2004. 67. 歐淑玲、李絳桃、陳美伶、曾旭民. 產婦性健康自我效能量表之發展. 實證護理. 2008;4(2):138-48. 68. 國立臺灣大學. 國立臺灣大學學生成績評量辦法. Available at: http://www.aca.ntu.edu.tw/lawList.asp. Accessed 5/2, 2017. 69. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys - The Tailored Design Method. 4 ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. 70. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology. 2003;88(5):879-903. 71. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. Oct 2006;29(5):489-97. 72. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. Aug 2007;30(4):459-67. 73. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design: Sage; 2004. 74. Presser S, Couper MP, Lessler JT, et al. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public opinion quarterly. 2004;68(1):109-30. 75. Zorek JA, Fike DS, Eickhoff JC, et al. Refinement and Validation of the Student Perceptions of Physician-Pharmacist Interprofessional Clinical Education Instrument. Am J Pharm Educ. Apr 25 2016;80(3):47. 76. Spark MJ, Willis J. Application of cognitive interviewing to improve self-administered questionnaires used in small scale social pharmacy research. Res Social Adm Pharm. Mar-Apr 2014;10(2):469-74. 77. Fowler FJ, 傅仰止、田芳華(譯). 改進調查問題:設計與評估. 臺北市: 弘智文化; 1999. 78. Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2007;71(2):287-311. 79. 吳明隆. SPSS統計應用與學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計. 新北市: 易習圖書; 2013. 80. Liang SY, Wu WW, Kuo CY, Lu YY. Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Symptom-Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Breast Cancer Related to Chemotherapy. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). Dec 2015;9(4):312-7. 81. Conway JM, Huffcutt AI. A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational research methods. 2003;6(2):147-68. 82. Osborne JW, Costello AB. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review. 2009;12(2):131-46. 83. 柴惠敏. 常態分佈 Normal Distribution 之檢測. Available at: http://www.pt.ntu.edu.tw/hmchai/SAS/SASdescriptive/SASnormality.htm. Accessed 5/5, 2017. 84. Burke JM, Miller WA, Spencer AP, et al. Clinical pharmacist competencies. Pharmacotherapy. Jun 2008;28(6):806-15. 85. Entry-level Competencies Needed for Pharmacy Practice in Hospitals and Health-Systems. Available at: http://www.ashp.org/DocLibrary/MemberCenter/Entry-level-Competencies.aspx. Accessed 12/25, 2016. 86. Medina MS, Plaza CM, Stowe CD, et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. Oct 14 2013;77(8):162. 87. Rouse MJ. Quality Assurance of Pharmacy Education: the FIP Global Framework. International Pharmaceutical Federation. Available at: http://fip.org/files/fip/PharmacyEducation/Quality_Assurance/QA_Framework_2nd_Edition_online_version.pdf. Accessed 12/26, 2016. 88. Hagemeier NE, Hess Jr R, Hagen KS, Sorah EL. Impact of an interprofessional communication course on nursing, medical, and pharmacy students' communication skill self-efficacy beliefs. Am J Pharm Educ. Dec 15 2014;78(10):186. 89. Kelley KA, Stanke LD, Rabi SM, Kuba SE, Janke KK. Cross-validation of an instrument for measuring professionalism behaviors. Am J Pharm Educ. Nov 10 2011;75(9):179. 90. Kimhi E, Reishtein JL, Cohen M, Friger M, Hurvitz N, Avraham R. Impact of Simulation and Clinical Experience on Self-efficacy in Nursing Students: Intervention Study. Nurse Educ. Jan-Feb 2016;41(1):E1-4. 91. Siddiqui OI. Methods for Computing Missing Item Response in psychometric scale construction. American Journal of Biostatistics. 2015;5(1):1-6. 92. Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ. Aug 07 2008;337:a288. 93. FIP Statement of professional standards: continuing professional development. Available at: https://www.fip.org/www/uploads/database_file.php?id=221&table_id=. Accessed 05/30, 2017. 94. Benson A, Cribb A, Barber N. Understanding pharmacists' values: A qualitative study of ideals and dilemmas in UK pharmacy practice. Social Science & Medicine. 2009;68(12):2223-30. 95. Makowsky MJ, Schindel TJ, Rosenthal M, Campbell K, Tsuyuki RT, Madill HM. Collaboration between pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners: a qualitative investigation of working relationships in the inpatient medical setting. Journal of interprofessional care. 2009;23(2):169-84. 96. Kvancz DA. A distinctive competency. Am J Health Syst Pharm. May 01 2006;63(9):819-28. 97. Franklin M, Sorra J. Community Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety Culture: user's guide. AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-0085. April 2014. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/qual/patientsafetyculture/pharmsurvindex.htm. Accessed May 28, 2017. 98. Farrell B, Richardson L, Raman-Wilms L, de Launay D, Alsabbagh MW, Conklin J. Self-efficacy for deprescribing: A survey for health care professionals using evidence-based deprescribing guidelines. Res Social Adm Pharm. Jan 28 2017. 99. 王愛玲、郭素娥、方素瓔、李世凱、徐畢卿. 戒菸服務自我效能量表-精神衛生臨床專業人員版之中文版發展與信效度檢定. 護理雜誌. 2012;59(5):49-56. 100. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology. 2012;63:539-69. 101. Bakken LL, Sheridan J, Carnes M. Gender differences among physician-scientists in self-assessed abilities to perform clinical research. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(12):1281-6. 102. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. Oct 2005;80(10 Suppl):S46-54. 103. Kaufman DM, Laidlaw TA, Langille D, Sargeant J, MacLeod H. Differences in medical students' attitudes and self-efficacy regarding patient-doctor communication. Acad Med. Feb 2001;76(2):188. 104. Rutter PM, Duncan G. Can professionalism be measured?: evidence from the pharmacy literature. Pharmacy Practice. 2010;8(1):18-28. 105. Beatty SJ, Kelley KA, Metzger AH, Bellebaum KL, McAuley JW. Team-based learning in therapeutics workshop sessions. Am J Pharm Educ. Oct 01 2009;73(6):100. 106. Chisholm MA, Cobb H, Duke L, McDuffie C, Kennedy WK. Development of an instrument to measure professionalism. Am J Pharm Educ. Aug 15 2006;70(4):85. 107. Childress BC, Bosler J, Beck M. Improving Student Knowledge in Medication Management Through an Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience. The Consultant Pharmacist®. 2013;28(6):390-5. 108. Jackson TL. Application of quality assurance principles: teaching medication error reduction skills in a 'real world' environment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(1):17. 109. FIP Statement of professional standards continuing professional devement. Available at: https://www.fip.org/www/uploads/database_file.php?id=221&table_id=. Accessed 05/30, 2017. 110. Yamamura S, Takehira R. Effect of practical training on the learning motivation profile of Japanese pharmacy students using structural equation modeling. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions. 2017;14(2). 111. Saseen JJ, Linnebur SA, Borgelt LM, Trujillo J, Fish DN, Mueller S. A Pharmacotherapy Capstone Course to Target Student Learning and Programmatic Curricular Assessment. Am J Pharm Educ. Apr 2017;81(3):45. 112. Williams B, Beovich B, Ross L, Wright C, Ilic D. Self-efficacy perceptions of interprofessional education and practice in undergraduate healthcare students. J Interprof Care. May 2017;31(3):335-41. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59360 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究背景:
自我效能(self-efficacy)是增進學習動機、產生學習行為的一大重要因素,確保學生在專業能力上具備良好的自我效能,不但能協助學生逐漸邁向成功,亦能做為教師由學生主觀認知的角度出發,評估教學成效的有力證據。臺大藥學系近年來已順利轉型為六年制Pharm.D.(Doctor of Pharmacy)學位,在此特別的時間點,建構一個量表來測量並觀察藥學生的專業能力自我效能的變化,將成為未來教育評估的重要參考依據之一。 研究目的: 本研究期望建構一個藥學專業能力自我效能量表,並進行信效度的驗證,同時對臺大藥學系高年級學生進行橫斷性的調查,以比較不同學制及年級之間自我效能的差異。 研究方法: 本研究透過完整的文獻回顧、焦點團體會議、內容效度審核、認知訪談預試等流程建構量表之構面與問項,並實際對臺大藥學系高年級學生進行施測,再經項目分析、分構面探索性因素分析、效標關聯效度及內部一致性檢定來驗證量表的信效度。最後以Student’s t-test、Mann-Whitney U-test及Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance ranks進行不同學制及年級之間自我效能的差異檢定。 研究結果: 本研究依照文獻回顧、焦點團體等資料,建構出包含五個構面(人際關係及溝通技巧、專業素養、藥事照護、醫療體制下之臨床工作、從工作中學習與成長)之「藥學系六年制學生專業能力自我效能量表」,共119個問項,每個問項的I-CVI均大於0.83,整份量表的S-CVI/Ave為0.98。施測後共回收了81份有效問卷(有效回收率94%),經項目分析及分構面探索性因素分析後,保留了53個問項,量表整體的內部一致性係數為0.969(各構面均達0.9以上)。在效標關聯效度上,近兩年學習成績較高者比起較低者,在專業素養、藥事照護以及量表整體得分上有顯著較高的自我效能(p < 0.05)。 而在橫斷性調查中顯示,六年制之六年級學生的自我效能在總分或各構面得分上,都比四年制之四年級、六年制之四年級與五年級三組學生還高,且在專業素養、藥事照護、醫療體制下之臨床工作、從工作中學習與成長等構面上,與六年制之四年級學生達到顯著差異(p < 0.05),另在藥事照護構面上,亦顯著地高於四年制之四年級學生(p < 0.05)。 結論: 本研究建構之自我效能量表具有良好的信、效度,未來之藥學教育研究者可以利用此量表來評估、觀察、監測學生的專業能力自我效能,收集來自學生端主觀的能力評估依據,做為教學成效的參考資料。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background:
Self-efficacy is crucial for students to be motivated and successfully strive for active learning. Students with high self-efficacy in professional competencies may not only reassure themselves to attain achievement, but their subjective assessments are also powerful evidence to evaluate effectiveness of teaching. The Bachelor of Science (B.S.) program in National Taiwan University School of Pharmacy has transited to 6-year Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) program recently. It is crucial to develop a scale to measure pharmacy students’ self-efficacy of professional competencies as an evidence for an evaluation of educational outcomes. Objectives: We aimed to develop a scale to measure pharmacy students’ self-efficacy of professional competencies and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Besides, we also aimed to explore the differences of students’ self-efficacy of 2 programs and years by a cross-sectional survey. Methods: The scale was developed based on literature review, interview of focus group, experts review and pretest with cognitive interview. We collected surveys from senior pharmacy students. We performed item analysis, stratified exploratory factor analysis, criterion-related validity and Cronbach’s alpha to validate the scale. Lastly, we compared the differences of self-efficacy between programs and years by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance ranks. Results: Five constructs (interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, pharmaceutical care, system based practice, practice based learning and improvement) and 119 items had been established based on literature review and experts’ opinions. The content validity index showed satisfying results (All I-CVIs higher than 0.83, S-CVI/Ave 0.98). A total of 81 students (94% response rate) responded the survey. After item analysis and stratified exploratory factor analysis, 53 items had been retained. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.969 for the whole scale (All constructs higher than 0.9). For criterion-related validity, students group of superior academic performance showed significantly higher self-efficacy than students group of inferior academic performance in the constructs of professionalism, pharmaceutical care and the total score (p < 0.05). In the cross-sectional survey, 6th year Pharm.D. students showed highest self-efficacy in all five constructs and the total score compared to the rest of students. Specifically, the former demonstrated significantly higher self-efficacy than 4th year Pharm.D. students in the constructs of professionalism, pharmaceutical care, system based practice, practice based learning and improvement (p < 0.05). In addition, 6th year Pharm.D. students also showed significantly higher self-efficacy than 4th year B.S. students in the construct of pharmaceutical care (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The newly developed scale demonstrated good reliability and validity. It may serve as a psychometrically sound tool for pharmacy educators and researchers to measure pharmacy students’ self-efficacy in professional competencies, and hence an evidence for educational outcomes evaluation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:21:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R05451006-1.pdf: 3378587 bytes, checksum: 311981254c315d627a1a4654a370622b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii Abstract v 圖目錄 xiii 表目錄 xiv 第1章 研究背景 1 1.1 醫藥環境變革 1 1.1.1 世界醫藥環境概況 1 1.1.2 臺灣藥事服務相關環境 1 1.2 藥師角色再定位 2 1.2.1 藥師服務型態之改變 2 1.2.2 藥師介入臨床服務 2 1.3 藥學教育改革 3 1.3.1 世界藥學教育趨勢 3 1.3.2 臺灣臨床藥學教育相關環境 3 1.3.3 臺灣大學之藥學教育變革 4 第2章 文獻探討 8 2.1 藥學教育評估 8 2.1.1 教育評估的基本概念 8 2.1.2 教育評估的相關準則 8 2.1.3 課程評估可用的資料 10 2.1.4 臺大藥學教育現有的評估方式 13 2.2 運用「學生自評」的相關研究 14 2.2.1 調查性研究 14 2.2.2 課程評估研究 16 2.3 學生自我效能與相關性研究 18 2.3.1 自我效能的意義 18 2.3.2 自我效能量表的建構研究 20 2.3.3 運用自我效能的藥學相關研究 21 第3章 研究目的 23 第4章 研究方法 24 4.1 藥學生專業能力架構探討 24 4.1.1 文獻蒐集 24 4.1.2 資料彙整 25 4.1.3 各核心能力構面之定義、內涵 25 4.2 焦點團體 27 4.2.1 成員組成 27 4.2.2 實施程序 27 4.2.3 訪談指引 28 4.2.4 逐字稿分析 29 4.3 專業能力自我效能量表之建構 29 4.3.1 問項設計 29 4.3.2 量表尺度選擇 31 4.3.3 效度驗證題目 31 4.3.4 問項的排列 33 4.3.5 問卷說明書 33 4.4 內容效度審查 35 4.4.1 內容效度指數 35 4.4.2 專家組成 36 4.4.3 審查程序 36 4.5 認知訪談預試 36 4.5.1 認知訪談簡介 36 4.5.2 預試程序 37 4.5.3 訪談指引 37 4.5.4 逐字稿分析 38 4.6 實際調查 38 4.6.1 倫理委員會審核 38 4.6.2 受試者選擇 38 4.6.3 調查程序 38 4.7 統計分析 39 4.7.1 作業軟體 39 4.7.2 統計模型設定 39 4.7.3 項目分析 40 4.7.4 KMO及Bartlett’s球型檢定 40 4.7.5 探索性因素分析 41 4.7.6 信度分析 42 4.7.7 常態性檢定 42 4.7.8 組別間比較 43 4.7.9 多元線性迴歸 43 第5章 研究結果 44 5.1 藥學生專業能力架構 44 5.1.1 主要參考文獻 44 5.1.2 各藥學會定義之概述與彙整 44 5.1.3 刪除之能力項目 45 5.2 焦點團體 46 5.2.1 受訪者背景資料 46 5.2.2 第一次焦點團體 47 5.2.3 第二次焦點團體 49 5.2.4 焦點團體小結 51 5.3 內容效度審查 51 5.3.1 專家組成 51 5.3.2 內容效度指數(CVI) 52 5.3.3 根據專家建議修改 52 5.3.4 內容效度小結 52 5.4 認知訪談預試 53 5.4.1 受訪者背景資料 53 5.4.2 意義單元、摘錄與問項修改 53 5.4.3 認知訪談預試小結 56 5.5 問卷發放與回收 58 5.5.1 有效回收率 58 5.5.2 遺漏值處理 58 5.6 項目分析 58 5.6.1 問項鑑別度 58 5.6.2 同質性檢驗 59 5.6.3 內部一致性係數(Cronbach’s α) 59 5.6.4 項目分析小結 59 5.7 KMO及Bartlett’s球型檢定 64 5.7.1 整體問項 64 5.7.2 分構面評估 64 5.8 探索性因素分析 65 5.9 短版量表信度 76 5.10 各組別之人口變項與描述性統計 76 5.11 效標關聯效度 78 5.11.1 依「進階醫院藥學實習經驗」檢定自我效能差異 78 5.11.2 依「近兩年學業成績平均」檢定自我效能差異 81 5.12 組別間自我效能差異分析 83 5.12.1 依性別分組之自我效能差異 83 5.12.2 「人際關係及溝通技巧」自我效能 85 5.12.3 「專業素養」自我效能 87 5.12.4 「藥事照護」自我效能 89 5.12.5 「醫療體制下之臨床工作」自我效能 91 5.12.6 「從工作中學習與成長」自我效能 93 5.12.7 藥學生專業能力自我效能 95 5.12.8 各問項之組別間比較 97 5.12.9 組別間比較小結 101 5.13 多元線性迴歸 103 第6章 討論 106 6.1 藥學專業能力架構 106 6.2 焦點團體內容 106 6.3 內容效度審核 108 6.4 認知訪談預試 109 6.5 項目分析 109 6.6 問卷之發放與回收 110 6.7 填答者之人口變項 110 6.8 建構效度 111 6.9 效標關聯效度 112 6.9.1 依「進階醫院藥學實習經驗」檢定自我效能差異 112 6.9.2 依「近兩年學業成績平均」檢定自我效能差異 113 6.10 內部一致性信度 113 6.11 組別間自我效能差異分析 114 6.11.1 性別間自我效能差異 114 6.11.2 藥學專業能力(整體量表) 114 6.11.3 人際關係及溝通技巧 114 6.11.4 專業素養 116 6.11.5 藥事照護 117 6.11.6 醫療體制下之臨床工作 117 6.11.7 從工作中學習與成長 118 6.11.8 六年制畢業生各構面能力比較 118 6.12 多元線性迴歸 119 6.13 研究限制 120 6.14 未來建議 120 第7章 結論 122 第8章 參考文獻 123 第9章 附錄 132 9.1 附錄一 132 9.2 附錄二 150 9.3 附錄三 157 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建構與驗證「藥學系六年制學生專業能力自我效能量表」 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Development and Validation of A Scale to Measure Pharm.D. Students' Self-Efficacy in Professional Competencies | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 蕭斐元(Fei-Yuan Hsiao) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林慧玲(Fe-Lin Lin),沈麗娟(Li-Jiuan Shen),吳佳儀(Chia-Yi Wu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 藥學專業能力,藥學教育,自我效能,量表建構, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Pharmacy professional competency,pharmacy education,self-efficacy,scale development, | en |
dc.relation.page | 159 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701193 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-06-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床藥學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床藥學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。