請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56148
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 胡名霞(Ming- Hsia Hu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林沂 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:16:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-10-09 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-10-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
1 Wimo A, Jonsson L, Winblad B. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and direct costs of dementia in 2003. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006;21:175-81. 2 Organization. WH. Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva : World Health Organization, 2012., 2012 3 Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, McKeel DW, Price JL, Rubin EH, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:397-405. 4 Pettersson AF, Olsson E, Wahlund LO. Motor function in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005;19:299-304. 5 Waite LM, Broe GA, Grayson DA, Creasey H. Motor function and disability in the dementias. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15:897-903. 6 Morris JC, Rubin EH, Morris EJ, Mandel SA. Senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type: an important risk factor for serious falls. J Gerontol 1987;42:412-7. 7 Tinetti ME, Williams CS. Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1279-84. 8 Fletcher PC, Hirdes JP. Restriction in activity associated with fear of falling among community-based seniors using home care services. Age Ageing 2004;33:273-9. 9 Pettersson AF, Engardt M, Wahlund LO. Activity level and balance in subjects with mild Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002;13:213-6. 10 Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1701-7. 11 Shaw FE, Bond J, Richardson DA, Dawson P, Steen IN, McKeith IG, et al. Multifactorial intervention after a fall in older people with cognitive impairment and dementia presenting to the accident and emergency department: randomised controlled trial. Bmj 2003;326:73. 12 Ryan JJ, McCloy C, Rundquist P, Srinivasan V, Laird R. Fall risk assessment among older adults with mild Alzheimer disease. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2011;34:19-27. 13 Scheffer AC, Schuurmans MJ, van Dijk N, van der Hooft T, de Rooij SE. Fear of falling: measurement strategy, prevalence, risk factors and consequences among older persons. Age Ageing 2008;37:19-24. 14 Cumming RG, Salkeld G, Thomas M, Szonyi G. Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF-36 scores, and nursing home admission. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:M299-305. 15 Delbaere K, Close JC, Taylor M, Wesson J, Lord SR. Validation of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale in cognitively impaired older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013;68:1098-102. 16 Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 1997;77:812-9. 17 Hauer K, Becker C, Lindemann U, Beyer N. Effectiveness of physical training on motor performance and fall prevention in cognitively impaired older persons: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:847-57. 18 Oliver D, Connelly JB, Victor CR, Shaw FE, Whitehead A, Genc Y, et al. Strategies to prevent falls and fractures in hospitals and care homes and effect of cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analyses. Bmj 2007;334:82. 19 Harlein J, Dassen T, Halfens RJ, Heinze C. Fall risk factors in older people with dementia or cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:922-33. 20 Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993;43:2412-4. 21 Albert MS. Changes in cognition. Neurobiol Aging 2011;32 Suppl 1:S58-63. 22 Petersen RC, Stevens JC, Ganguli M, Tangalos EG, Cummings JL, DeKosky ST. Practice parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2001;56:1133-42. 23 Caselli RJ. Current issues in the diagnosis and management of dementia. Semin Neurol 2003;23:231-40. 24 Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Geda YE, Ivnik RJ, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Arch Neurol 2009;66:1447-55. 25 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975;12:189-98. 26 Wind AW, Schellevis FG, Van Staveren G, Scholten RJPM, Jonker C, Van Eijk JTM. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in diagnosing dementia in general practice. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 1997;12:101-8. 27 Castro-Costa É, Fuzikawa C, Uchoa E, Firmo JOA, Lima-Costa MF. Norms for the mini-mental state examination: adjustment of the cut-off point in population-based studies (evidences from the Bambuí health aging study). Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 2008;66:524-8. 28 Delbaere K, Kochan NA, Close JC, Menant JC, Sturnieks DL, Brodaty H, et al. Mild cognitive impairment as a predictor of falls in community-dwelling older people. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012;20:845-53. 29 Montero-Odasso M, Wells JL, Borrie MJ, Speechley M. Can cognitive enhancers reduce the risk of falls in older people with mild cognitive impairment? A protocol for a randomised controlled double blind trial. BMC Neurol 2009;9:42. 30 Jorstad EC, Hauer K, Becker C, Lamb SE. Measuring the psychological outcomes of falling: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:501-10. 31 Friedman SM, Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, Fried LP. Falls and fear of falling: which comes first? A longitudinal prediction model suggests strategies for primary and secondary prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1329-35. 32 Hauer KA, Kempen GI, Schwenk M, Yardley L, Beyer N, Todd C, et al. Validity and sensitivity to change of the falls efficacy scales international to assess fear of falling in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Gerontology 2011;57:462-72. 33 American Geriatrics Society, Academy GSOA, On Falls Prevention OSP. Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2001;49:664-72. 34 Taylor ME, Delbaere K, Lord SR, Mikolaizak AS, Brodaty H, Close JC. Neuropsychological, Physical, and Functional Mobility Measures Associated With Falls in Cognitively Impaired Older Adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013 35 Anstey KJ, von Sanden C, Luszcz MA. An 8-year prospective study of the relationship between cognitive performance and falling in very old adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:1169-76. 36 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed 'Up & Go': a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142-8. 37 Taylor ME, Lord SR, Delbaere K, Mikolaizak AS, Close JC. Physiological fall risk factors in cognitively impaired older people: a one-year prospective study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2012;34:181-9. 38 Taylor ME, Delbaere K, Lord SR, Mikolaizak AS, Close JC. Physical impairments in cognitively impaired older people: implications for risk of falls. Int Psychogeriatr 2013;25:148-56. 39 Hauer K, Pfisterer M, Weber C, Wezler N, Kliegel M, Oster P. Cognitive Impairment Decreases Postural Control During Dual Tasks in Geriatric Patients with a History of Severe Falls. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2003;51:1638-44. 40 Montero-Odasso M, Muir SW, Speechley M. Dual-task complexity affects gait in people with mild cognitive impairment: the interplay between gait variability, dual tasking, and risk of falls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:293-9. 41 Suzuki M, Ohyama N, Yamada K, Kanamori M. The relationship between fear of falling, activities of daily living and quality of life among elderly individuals. Nurs Health Sci 2002;4:155-61. 42 Murphy SL, Williams CS, Gill TM. Characteristics associated with fear of falling and activity restriction in community-living older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:516-20. 43 Vellas BJ, Wayne SJ, Romero LJ, Baumgartner RN, Garry PJ. Fear of falling and restriction of mobility in elderly fallers. Age Ageing 1997;26:189-93. 44 Reelick MF, van Iersel MB, Kessels RP, Rikkert MG. The influence of fear of falling on gait and balance in older people. Age Ageing 2009;38:435-40. 45 Delbaere K, Smith ST, Lord SR. Development and initial validation of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011;66:674-80. 46 Molloy DW, Alemayehu E, Roberts R. Reliability of a Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:102-5. 47 Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The Mini-Mental State Examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1992;40:922-35. 48 Anthony JC, LeResche L, Niaz U, Von Korff MR, Folstein MF. Limits of the ‘Mini-Mental State’ as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychological Medicine 1982;12:397-408. 49 Tariq SH, Tumosa N, Chibnall JT, Perry MH, 3rd, Morley JE. Comparison of the Saint Louis University mental status examination and the mini-mental state examination for detecting dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder--a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14:900-10. 50 Cruz-Oliver DM, Malmstrom TK, Allen CM, Tumosa N, Morley JE. The Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University mental status exam (SLUMS exam) and the Mini-mental status exam as predictors of mortality and institutionalization. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16:636-41. 51 Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J 1965;14:61-5. 52 Shinar D, Gross CR, Bronstein KS, Licata-Gehr EE, Eden DT, Cabrera AR, et al. Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:723-8. 53 Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:61-3. 54 Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE. The stroke rehabilitation outcome study--Part I: General description. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:506-9. 55 Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the 'get-up and go' test. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1986;67:387-9. 56 Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH, Wu HD, Wang YW, Huang FC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1343-8. 57 Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther 2000;80:896-903. 58 Abernethy B. Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: Some applications and methodological constraints. Journal of Human Movement Studies 1988;14 32. 59 Schwenk M, Zieschang T, Oster P, Hauer K. Dual-task performances can be improved in patients with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2010;74:1961-8. 60 Kraha A, Turner H, Nimon K, Zientek LR, Henson RK. Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Front Psychol 2012;3:44. 61 Courville T, Thompson B. Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: β is not Enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2001;61:229-48. 62 Bootsma-van der Wiel A, Gussekloo J, de Craen AJ, van Exel E, Bloem BR, Westendorp RG. Walking and talking as predictors of falls in the general population: the Leiden 85-Plus Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1466-71. 63 Arfken CL, Lach HW, Birge SJ, Miller JP. The prevalence and correlates of fear of falling in elderly persons living in the community. Am J Public Health 1994;84:565-70. 64 Ballard CG, Shaw F, Lowery K, McKeith I, Kenny R. The prevalence, assessment and associations of falls in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999;10:97-103. 65 Jensen J, Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Fall and injury prevention in older people living in residential care facilities. A cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:733-41. 66 Zijlstra GA, van Haastregt JC, van Rossum E, van Eijk JT, Yardley L, Kempen GI. Interventions to reduce fear of falling in community-living older people: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:603-15. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56148 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 跌倒是影響老年人健康與獨立能力的重要議題,而認知障礙及失智症老年人之「跌倒」與「害怕跌倒」發生率為一般老人之二至三倍,比例更高,也更值得重視。跌倒及害怕跌倒有可能互為因果,亦可能各有獨立機制。活動能力與認知能力是影響跌倒與害怕跌倒的兩大重要因素,近期更有學者提出活動與認知能力的交互作用,也就是雙項任務評估方式可能可以更進一步了解兩種能力之相對貢獻性。本研究目的為評估社區認知障礙或失智老人之認知能力、活動能力及雙重任務表現,進而探討上述能力表現與跌倒及害怕跌倒之關聯性及相對貢獻度。
本研究之主要研究對象為居住於社區之認知障礙或失智老人。根據醫院病歷或日照中心資料做個案之初步篩檢,經個案本人及其有同意權人同意後進行收案。每位受試者皆完成基本資料收集(包括年齡、性別、跌倒史及巴氏量表分數等)並接受約30分鐘的測試評估,評估工具包括簡版圖像化跌倒關注程度量表(測量害怕跌倒程度)、簡易智能狀態測驗(測量認知能力)、聖路易大學心智狀態測驗(測量認知能力)、計時起走測試(測量活動能力)、計時起走及減三雙重任務測試(測量認知及活動能力之雙重影響)等共五項。完成評估後滿一個月時,評估人員以電話訪問並記錄受試者自初測至電訪期間之跌倒次數與跌倒經驗。本研究使用描述性統計分析並呈現兩組受試者之基本資料特性,並使用相關性分析(correlation analysis)及迴歸分析法(regression analysis)做後續資料處理,以了解各項評估結果與跌倒次數或害怕跌倒程度之相關性及相對貢獻程度。 本研究共納入57位個案,包含17位男性及40位女性,平均年齡為79.7歲。依照簡易智能狀態測驗標準分類,47.4%的個案為重度認知功能障礙。一個月期間的跌倒次數平均為0.14次,範圍由0至1次;參加研究前一年內的跌倒次數平均為1.09次,範圍由0至12次。運用迴歸分析法,設定自變項為年齡、性別、巴氏量表分數、計時起走及減三雙重任務測試(雙重任務成本值)、計時起走測試及認知能力測驗,以跌倒次數或害怕跌倒程度做為依變項進行分析。研究結果顯示若以個案跌倒次數為依變項,無論是回溯性(retrospective)還是前瞻性(prospective)分析,均顯示認知能力分數與跌倒次數呈現正相關(以簡易智能狀態測驗為自變項,回溯性r=0.165; 前瞻性r=0.234),雙重任務成本值(dual task cost)與跌倒次數呈現負相關(回溯性r= -0.185; 前瞻性r= -0.061),貢獻程度為認知能力(以簡易智能狀態測驗為自變項|Beta|=0.371)大於活動能力(|Beta|=0.283),雙重任務表現(|Beta|=0.023)之貢獻度最小。若以個案害怕跌倒程度為依變項,則發現認知能力(以簡易智能狀態測驗為自變項r= -0.154)、活動能力(r= -0.373, p= 0.004)及雙重任務成本值(r= -0.088)與害怕跌倒程度均呈現負相關,貢獻程度為活動能力(|Beta|=0.289)大於認知能力(以簡易智能狀態測驗為自變項|Beta|=0.084),雙重任務表現(|Beta|=0.06)之貢獻度最小。 統合上述論點,認知能力愈好的認知障礙或失智社區老人,跌倒機率反而愈高;而活動能力表現與個案之害怕跌倒程度有統計上之顯著相關。若將研究結果運用於臨床策略中,適當給予輕度至中度認知障礙老人及其主要照顧者跌倒防範之概念,同時增加個案之活動能力訓練以降低害怕跌倒程度或跌倒次數,或許可達到降低跌倒發生率之目的,而雙重任務表現與認知障礙或失智社區老人之跌倒次數有相關,但相對貢獻度較少,是否適合作為社區失智老人之重要跌倒預測評估測驗則尚須進一步探究。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With aging of the world population, “Falls” and “Fear of falling” become an important issue which may influence health and independence of the older adults. The incidence of falls and fear of falling are twice or more on cognitive impaired older adults. The relationship between falls and fear of falling on cognitive impaired older adults remains unclear. Mobility and cognition may be the main factors that influence falls and fear of falling, and the interaction between these two factors has been suggest recently. This study aims to find out the relative contribution of mobility and cognition to falls and fear of falling in.
The participants in this study were cognitive impaired community-dwelling older adults recruited from National Taiwan University hospital and day care centers in Neihu and Songshan. The basic data (age, gender, fall history, Barthel index) of each subject were collected. The assessment tool including Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES, fear of falling), Timed ”Up & Go” test (TUG, mobility), Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE, cognition), Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS, cognition), Timed ”Up & Go” and Subtraction by Threes dual task (interaction between mobility and cognition). One month after the assessment, the assessor will recorded the number of falls by calling the subjects. The descriptive statistics analysis were used to describe the basic characteristics of the participants, the correlation and regression analysis were used to understand the relative contribution of those factors to falls and fear of falling. This study recruited 57 participants (17 male and 40 female), the average age was 79.7 years old. 47.4% severe cognitive impaired older adults were included in this study. The average number of falls before this assessment is 1.09 in one year, range from 0 to 12. The average number of falls after the assessment is 0.14 in 1 month, range from 0 to 1. For numbers of falls, the correlation analysis shows positive relationship with MMSE scores (retrospective/prospective r= 0.165/0.234), negative relationship with dual task cost (retrospective/prospective r= -0.185/-0.061). The order of important contributors for falls is cognition (|Beta|=0.371), mobility (|Beta|=0.283) and dual task performance (|Beta|=0.023). For fear of falling, the correlation analysis shows positive relationship with TUG seconds (r= 0.373, p=0.004), negative relationship with MMSE scores (r= -0.154), dual task cost (r= -0.088). The order of important contributors for fear of falling is mobility (|Beta|=0.289), cognition (|Beta|=0.084) and dual task performance (|Beta|=0.06). In conclusion, fall incidence may be higher in those who have better cognition status in cognitive impaired community-dwelling older adults, and the mobility may be an important factor for fear of falling due to significant high correlation. the dual task performance have low correlation and relative contribution to the number of falls, whether or not to use this kind of assessment for assessing clinical cognitive impaired older adults needs more research to find out. The result of this study can be a useful concept for designing clinical fall-prevention program. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:16:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01428011-1.pdf: 6940238 bytes, checksum: e9dfa7f2222e84f495a1c6676d105813 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書 誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 前言 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究問題與假設 3 第四節 研究重要性 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 失智症及輕度認知障礙背景介紹 6 第二節 認知障礙或失智老人之跌倒問題 7 第三節 認知障礙或失智老人之跌倒相關因素 9 第四節 評估量表與工具介紹 11 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究設計 18 第二節 研究對象 18 第三節 評估方式 19 第四節 資料處理與統計分析 22 第四章 結果 23 第一節 受試者基本資料 23 第二節 評估者間信度 24 第三節 活動能力及認知能力表現對於跌倒次數之相對貢獻度 24 第四節 活動能力及認知能力表現對於害怕跌倒之相對貢獻度 31 第五章 討論 34 第一節 認知障礙或失智社區老人之跌倒相關因素及其相對貢獻度 34 第二節 認知障礙或失智社區老人之害怕跌倒相關因素及其相對貢獻度 36 第三節 跌倒及害怕跌倒之其它相關因素 38 第四節 研究限制 39 第五節 臨床應用及未來研究方向 41 第六章 結論 43 參考文獻 44 表目錄 表1. 受試者基本資料 52 表2. 認知障礙等級分類之交叉比對表 53 表3. 評估者間信度 54 表4. 常態分佈檢定結果 55 表5. 依變項與自變項之相關性 56 表6. 自變項之相關性 57 表7. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式一 58 表8. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式二 59 表9. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式三 60 表10. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式四 61 表11. 多元邏輯斯迴歸分析結果-公式五 62 表12. 多元邏輯斯迴歸分析結果-公式六 63 表13. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式七 64 表14. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式八 65 表15. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式九 66 表16. 多元迴歸分析結果-公式十 67 圖目錄 圖1. 實驗流程圖 68 圖2. 個案教育程度百分比 69 附錄 附錄 1. 簡化版圖像化跌倒關注程度量表 70 附錄 2. 簡易智能狀態測驗 75 附錄 3. 聖路易大學心智狀態測驗 77 附錄4. 巴氏量表 79 附錄5. 受試者基本資料及評估表 81 附錄6. 研究受試者說明及同意書 88 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 認知障礙老人之活動能力及認知能力表現對於跌倒及害怕跌倒之相對貢獻分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Relative Contribution of Mobility and Cognition to Falls and Fear of Falling in Cognitive Impaired Older Adults | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 邱銘章(Ming- Jang Chiu),曹昭懿(Jau- Yih Tsauo) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 失智症,認知障礙,跌倒,害怕跌倒,認知能力,活動能力, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | dementia,cognitive impairment,fall,fear of falling,cognitive performance,mobility performance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 88 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.78 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。