請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51355
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊景程 | |
dc.contributor.author | Po-Tsun Chuang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 莊柏遵 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:31:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-03-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-02-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 陳威廷。2004。有害生物對臺灣農業生態環境影響之經濟分析-以福壽螺、果實蠅為例。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士論文。 莊益源。2009。東方果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)) 雄蟲誘殺效力之評估。 國立中興大學昆蟲學系博士論文。
莊益源、侯豐男。2008。改良型長效誘殺器外觀顏色對東方果實蠅誘殺效果之田間測詴與評估。臺灣昆蟲 28: 259-276。 莊益源、魏妙楹、唐立正、侯豐男。2012.。果樹重要害蟲之田間診斷要領與案例分析。2012 植物疫病蟲害診斷案例分析研討會專刊。行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局 pp. 15-25。 黃莉欣、蘇文瀛。2000。東方果實蠅之發生生態與防治。楊桃綜合管理。農業藥物毒物詴驗所pp. 171-178。 鄭允、古德業、高靜華、黃毓斌。1996。瓜果實蠅誘殺劑不穩定性研究-乃力松及克蠅之分解作用。中華農業研究 45: 422-35。 劉玉章。2002。害蟲個論-東方果實蠅 植物保護圖鑑系列9-柑橘保護。行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局pp. 82-88。 Alessandro C, Claudio I, Gianfranco A. 2012. A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bull Insectol 65: 149-160. Bateman MA. 1972. The ecology of fruit fly. Annu Rev Entomol 17: 493-518. Bluthgen N, Gebauer G, Fiedler K. 2003. Disentangling a rainforest food web using stable isotopes: dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community. Oecologia 137: 426-435. Bluthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitia W, Jaffe K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125: 229-240. Clarke AR, Armstrong KF, Carmichael AE, Milne JR, Raghu S, Roderick GK, et al. 2005. Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 50: 293-319. Chuang YY, Hou RF. 2008. Effectiveness of attract-and-kill systems using methyl eugenol incorporated with neonicotinoid insecticides against the oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 101: 352-359. Drew RAI. 1974. The responses of fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the south pacific area to male attractants. Aust J Entomol 13: 267-270. Drew RAI, Hooper GHS. 1981. The responses of fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Australia to various attractants. Aust J Entomol 20: 201-205. Fletcher B. 1987. The biology of dacine fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 32: 115-144. Floren A, Biun A, Linsenmair KE. 2002. Arboreal ants as key predators in tropical lowland rainforest trees. Oecologia 131: 137-144. Holldobler B, Wilson EO. 1990. The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Howarth VMC, Howarth FG. 2000. Attractiveness of methyl eugenol baited traps to oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): effects of dosage, placement, and color. Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc 34: 167-178. Howlett FM. 1912. The effect of oil of Citronella on two species of Dacus. T Roy Ent Soc London 60: 412-418. Howlett FM. 1915. Chemical reactions of fruit-flies. Bull Entomol Res 6: 297-305. Jakubas WJ, Shah PS, Mason JR, Norman DM. 1992. Avian Repellency of Coniferyl and Cinnamyl Derivatives. Ecol Appl 2: 147-156. Kaspariz M, Yanovlak SP. 2001. Bait use in tropical litter and canopy ants-evidence of differences in nutrient limitation1. Biotropica 33: 207-211. Koyama J, Teruya T, Tanaka K. 1984. Eradication of the oriental fruit fly (diptera: tephritidae) from the okinawa islands by a male annihilation method. J Econ Entomol 77: 468-472. Lloyd A, Leach P, Kopittke R. 1998. Effects of exposure on chemical content and efficacy of male annihilation blocks used in the eradication of Bactrocera papayae in north Queensland. Gen Appl Entomol 28: 1-8. Matsuyama T, Haraguchi D, Kuba H. 2008.Comparison of commercial adhesives used for preventing ant invasion of fruit fly monitoring trap. Kyushu Pl Prot Res 54: 123-126. Nishida R, Fukami H. 1990. Sequestration of distasteful compounds by some pharmacophagous insects. J Chem Ecol 16: 151-164. Schutze MK, Aketarawong N, Amornsak W, Armstrong KF, Augustinos AA, Barr N, et al. 2015a. Synonymization of key pest species within the Bactrocera dorsalis species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): taxonomic changes based on a review of 20 years of integrative morphological, molecular, cytogenetic, behavioural and chemoecological data. Syst Entomol 40: 456-471. Schutze MK, Mahmood K, Pavasovic ANA, Bo W, Newman J, Clarke AR, et al. 2015b. One and the same: integrative taxonomic evidence that Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) is the same species as the Oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis. Syst Entomol 40: 472-486. Shelly T. 2010. Effects of methyl eugenol and raspberry ketone / cue lure on the sexual behavior of Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl Entomol Zool 45: 349-361. Steiner LF, Mitchell WC, Harris EJ, Kozuma TT, Fujimoto MS. 1965. Oriental fruit fly eradication by male annihilation. J Econ Entomol 58: 961-964. Tan KH. 1993. Ecohormones for the management of fruit fly pests: Understanding plant-fruit-fly-predator interrelationships. Management of insect pests: Nuclear and related molecular and genetic techniques. IAEA-SM. pp. 495-503. Tan KH, Nishida R. 1996. Sex pheromone and mating competition after methyl eugenol consumption in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex. Fruit fly pests: a world assessment of their biology and management St Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL. pp. 147-153. Tan KH, Nishida R, Toong YC. 2002. Floral synomone of a wild orchid, Bulbophyllum cheiri, lures Bactrocera fruit flies for pollination. J Chem Ecol 28: 1161-1172. Terayama M. 2009. A synopsis of the Family Formicidae of Taiwan (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Liberal Arts Bull. Kanto Gakuen Univ 17: 81-266. Vargas RI, Mau RFL, Jang EB, Faust RM, Wong L. 2008. The Hawaii fruit fly area-wide pest management program. Areawide IPM: theory to implementation. CABI Books. London. United Kingdom. pp. 300-325. Vargas RI, Miller NW, Stark JD. 2003. Field trials of spinosad as a replacement for naled, DDVP, and malathion in methyl eugenol and cue-lure bucket traps to attract and kill male oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 96: 1780-1785. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Kido MH, Ketter HM, Whitehand LC. 2000. Methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps for suppression of male oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii: effects of lure mixtures and weathering. J Econ Entomol 93: 81-87. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Mackey B, Bull R. 2005. Weathering trials of amulet cue-lure and amulet methyl eugenol “attract-and-kill” stations with male melon flies and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 98: 1551-1559. Warner JR. 2003. Bait preferences and toxicity of insecticides to white-footed ants Technomyrmex albipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Master thesis, University of Florida. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51355 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 甲基丁香油誘蟲器常用於監測東方果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis) 之族群密度,為詳實反應其田間密度,許多研究皆致力於探討誘引效力的相關物化因子,例如懸掛高度或誘引物質改進,但影響果實蠅密度估算之外在生物因子似乎較少受到重視。許多研究,包括許多第一線改良場人員,皆指出果實蠅誘蟲器中出現大量螞蟻,但對於螞蟻於誘蟲器中所造成之影響則不得而知,主要因應方式大多僅建議進行防蟻措施。因此本研究以此議題為主軸,探討螞蟻存在是否影響果實蠅誘蟲器之樣本數目 (是否影響果實蠅密度監測之準確性),與影響螞蟻進入陷阱之因素。本研究以懸巢舉尾家蟻 (Crematogaster rogenhoferi) 為例,首先探討舉尾家蟻是否受甲基丁香油誘引而進入誘蟲器:以冷凍處理與有、無含毒甲基丁香油 (TME、ME) 處理之果實蠅供舉尾家蟻選擇,經12小時後雖三處理數目皆有減少,但冷凍處理之果實蠅數目均較TME及ME處理低,顯示舉尾家蟻對甲基丁香油並無明顯偏好性存在,且只於TME處理發現大量舉尾家蟻死亡,此現象與誘蟲器中死亡螞蟻如出一轍,可能為甲基丁香油中添加之乃力松 (naled) 毒害造成。後續進一步探討螞蟻進入誘蟲器對樣本造成影響是否有穩定時間點可循,室內結果至14天試驗結束時,誘蟲器中果實蠅數目幾無減少,每日皆有不同數目螞蟻死亡,推測可能含毒甲基丁香油於室內耗損極小,對螞蟻而言進入誘蟲器之門檻仍與試驗開始時幾乎相同。因此重新於室外環境後進行實驗,結果與前述室內試驗相似,無法藉由螞蟻死亡數及誘蟲器剩餘果實蠅數目推斷螞蟻何時進入誘蟲器。此干擾現象可能不受乃力松強弱影響,而是取決於螞蟻對食物之需求與否。最後於苗栗縣及新北市數樣點安裝懸掛鐵絲上以黏蟲膠處理之誘蟲器與慣行誘蟲器各一,每兩周觀察誘蟲器內果實蠅及螞蟻種類及數量,觀察是否能阻止或減少螞蟻對樣本的干擾。結果發現有多種螞蟻可於慣行誘蟲器中發現,並以舉尾家蟻屬、皺家蟻屬 (Tetramorium)、管琉璃蟻屬 (Ochetellus) 之螞蟻為大宗,且果實蠅破損比例顯著高於黏蟲膠處理組別,顯示黏蟲膠能防止螞蟻進入誘蟲器以及樣本破損的發生達近一年。本研究討論相關試驗受螞蟻干擾之潛在影響,並測試可適用於誘蟲器之防蟲資材,盼對於臺灣果實蠅相關試驗上有所幫助。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Methyl eugenol trap is one of primary methods for controlling and monitoring several fruit fly species including oriental fruit flies (Bactrocera dorsalis), a pest that causes serve ecological loss to tropical fruit trees. To accurately reflect field density of B. dorsalis, numerous studies focused on the intrinsic factors such as attractiveness of methyl eugenol. Extrinsic factors that may influence accuracy of fly density monitoring, however, receive less attention. The present study is therefore to explore the long term effect of the presence of ants on the number of B. dorsalis in the methyl eugenol traps. Relevant issues regarding attractiveness of methyl eugenol to the ants and time point(s) when the ants initiate intensive foraging activities in the traps were also discussed. B. dorsalis killed by freezing (FZ), toxicant (naled) methyl eugenol (TME) and pure methyl eugenol (ME) were offered to the acrobat ants (Crematogaster rogenhoferi) under a non-choice test, and results showed that the ants fed on the three types of B. dorsali with slight preference on FZ over others. High number of dead ants were found in TME treated groups, suggesting that TME may impose negative effects on the ants after consumed. Under both lab and field conditions, the acrobat ant nests were connected to McPhail trap in which a cotton containing TME and freshly killed B. dorsalis were placed, and number of fruit flies remained and dead ants in trap were recorded on a daily basis for two weeks. Results indicated that number of fruit flies was nearly the same after 14 days in lab conditions (walk-in chamber), but not those in field conditions where ants did consume on certain proportions of the fruit flies. Along with the finding of the number of dead ants being constantly high in both conditions, the presence of the ants in the traps as well as time point of the ants initiating foraging activities seem not affected by the amount of TME. Field experiments were also conducted in Miaoli County and New Taipei City to compare the number of B. dorsalis between conventional and glue-coated (string) methyl eugenol traps. It was observed that the proportion of intact fruit flies in the conventional traps is significant lower than the glue-coated ones, and number of ants per trap is predominantly higher in the conventional traps than in the glue-coated traps. Most of ant species observed were Crematogaster, Tetramorium and Ochetellus spp. Such patterns suggest that reduction of number of fruit flies in conventional traps likely result from foraging ants, and glue-coated trap can effectively prevent ants from entering into traps. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:31:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02645008-1.pdf: 1115667 bytes, checksum: 6ef0405f4d7f766ff6934693fe509e94 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口詴委員審定書 ............................................................................................................... i
致謝 .................................................................................................................................. ii 摘要 ................................................................................................................................. iii Abstract ............................................................................................................................. v 目錄 ................................................................................................................................ vii 表目錄 ........................................................................................................................... viii 圖目錄 ............................................................................................................................. ix 前言 .................................................................................................................................. 1 前人研究 .......................................................................................................................... 3 東方果實蠅 ........................................................................................................ 3 甲基丁香油及其應用 ........................................................................................ 3 材料與方法 ...................................................................................................................... 5 蟲源製備與器材準備 ...................................................................................................... 5 詴驗設計 .......................................................................................................................... 5 1. 螞蟻是否對甲基丁香油具偏好性 .......................................................... 5 2. 螞蟻進入誘蟲器之時間點探討 (室內) ................................................. 6 3. 螞蟻進入誘蟲器之時間點探討 (室外) ................................................. 6 4. 防蟲處理前後之果實蠅誘蟲器樣本差異之調查 .................................. 7 結果 .................................................................................................................................. 9 1. 螞蟻是否對甲基丁香油具偏好性 ............................................................. 9 2. 螞蟻進入誘蟲器之時間點探討 (室內) .................................................... 9 3. 螞蟻進入誘蟲器之時間點探討 (室外) .................................................... 9 4. 防蟲處理前後之果實蠅誘蟲器樣本差異之調查 ................................... 10 討論 ................................................................................................................................. 11 螞蟻進入誘蟲器之原因:以甲基丁香油為例 ............................................... 11 含毒甲基丁香油是否為影響螞蟻進入誘蟲器時間之因子 .......................... 12 黏蟲膠處理之誘蟲器是否能減少螞蟻干擾 .................................................. 13 參考文獻 ........................................................................................................................ 17 附錄 ................................................................................................................................ 44 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 螞蟻對甲基丁香油誘蟲器內果實蠅樣本之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effect of ants on Tephritid fly samples in methyl eugenol-baited traps | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃榮南 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭旭峰,林宗歧 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 螞蟻,黏蟲膠,果實蠅監測,甲基丁香油, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ants,density monitoring,glue-coated trap,methyl eugenol,oriental fruit fly, | en |
dc.relation.page | 45 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-02-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。