請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50726
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林楨家(Jen-Jia Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Tong Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭雨桐 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:54:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 白詩滎(2013)。臺北公共自行車使用行為特性分析與友善環境建構之研究,國立政治大學私立中國地政研究所碩士論文。
交通部運輸研究所(2011)。綠色運輸知識建構與行銷推廣。臺北:交通部運輸研究所。 李茂全(2003)。大眾運輸之供應與私人運具擁有關係之研究-以臺北都會區與新竹市大學生為例。國立交通大學運輸科技與管理研究所碩士論文。 林胤宏(2011)。單車好城市。臺北:貓頭鷹出版社。 徐瑞彬(2001)。以社會經濟與土地使用因素探討臺北都會區總體旅運型態。國立交通大學運輸工程研究所碩士論文。 鼎漢國際工程顧問股份有限公司(2014)。公共自行車永續經營研究期中報告。臺北:臺北市政府交通局。 臺北市政府交通局(2015)。公共自行車租賃站設置準則。臺北:臺北市政府交通局。 YouBike 臺北市公共自行車(2015)。YouBike官網。http://taipei.youbike.com.tw/cht/index.php。(2015年4月29日) Alexander C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press. Bordagaray, M., Ibeas, A. & Dell’Olio, L. (2012). Modeling user perception of public bicycle services. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 1308-1316. Broach, J., Dill, J. & Gliebe, J. (2012). Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transportation Research Part A, 46, 1730-1740. Cervero, R. & Duncan, M. (2003). Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1478-1483. Cervero, R. & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D, 2(3), 199-219. Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L. & Neiman, A. (2009). Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3, 203-226. Corcoran, J., Li, T., Rohde, D., Charles-Edwards, E. & Mateo-Babiano, D. (2014). Spatio-temporal patterns of a public bicycle sharing program: The effect of weather and calendar events. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 292-305. de Hartog, J., Boogaard, H., Nijland, H. & Hoek, G. (2010). Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risk? Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, 1109-1116. DeMaio, P. (2009). Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(4), 44-66. Faghih-Imani, A., Elurua, N., El-Geneidy, A. M., Rabbat, M. & Haq, U. (2014). How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: Evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 306–314. Fishman, E., Washington, S. & Haworth, N. (2013). Bike share: A synthesis of the literature. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 33(2), 148-165. Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N. & Mazzei, A. (2014). Barriers to bikesharing: An analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 325–337. Goodman, A. & Cheshire, J. (2014). Inequalities in London bicycle sharing system revisited: Impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 272-279. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan. Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R. & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), 64-73. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books. Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., & Banchs, R. (2010). Urban cycles and mobility patterns: Exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6(4), 455-466. Lee, C. & Moudon, A. (2004). Physical activity and environment research in the health field: Implications for urban and transportation planning practice and research. Journal of Planning Literature, 19, 147-181. Lin, J. J. & Yu, T. P. (2011). Built environment effects on leisure travel for children: Trip generation and travel mode. Transport Policy, 18, 246-258. Lin, J.-R. & Yang, T.-H. (2011). Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints. Transportation Research Part E, 47, 284–294. Lin, J.-R., Yang, T.-H. & Chang, Y.-C. (2013). A hub location inventory model for bicycle sharing system design: Formulation and solution. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65, 77-86. Lynch, K. (1981). Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Maizlish, N., Woodcock, J., Co, S., Ostro, B. & Fanai, A. (2013). Health co-benefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay area. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 703-709. Martin, E. & Shaheen, S. (2014). Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: A tale of two U.S. cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 315-324. Mitchell R. & Rapkin, C. (1954). Urban traffic: a function of land use. New York: Columbia University Press. Moudon, A. & Lee C. (2003). Walking and biking: An evaluation of environmental audit instruments. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 21-37. Moudon, A., Lee C., Cheadle A., Collier C., Johnson D., Schmid T. & Weather R. (2005). Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transportation Research Part D, 10, 245-261. Murphy, E. & Usher, J. (2015). The role of bicycle-sharing in the city: Analysis of the Irish experience. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(2), 116-125. Nair, R. & Miller-Hooks, E. (2011). Fleet management for vehicle sharing operations. Transportation Science, 45, 524–540. Nakamura, H. & Abe, N. (2014). The role of a non-profit organization-run public bicycle-sharing programme: The case of Kitakyushu City, Japan. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 338-345. Noland, R. & Ishaque, M. (2006). Smart bicycles in an urban area: Evaluation of a pilot scheme in London. Journal of Public Transportation, 9(5), 71-95. O’Brien, O., Cheshire, J. & Batty, M. (2014). Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport system. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 262-273. Rixey, R. (2013). Station-level forecasting of bike sharing ridership: Station network effects in three U.S. systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387, 46-55. Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Tainio, M. & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2011). The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: Health impact assessment study. British Medical Journal, 343, 4521. Shaheen, S. A., Zhang, H., Martin, E. & Guzman, S. (2011). China’s Hangzhou public bicycle understanding early adoption and behavioral response to bikesharing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2247, 34-41. Shaheen, S., Guzman, S. & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143, 159-167. Soltani, A. & Allan, A. (2006). Analyzing the Impacts of microscale urban attributes on travel: Evidence from suburban Adelaide, Australia. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132, 132-137. Tran, T. D., Ovtracht, N. & Faivre d’Arcier, B. (2015). Modeling bike sharing system using built environment factors. Procedia CIRP, 30, 293-298. Vogel, M., Hamon, R., Lozenguez, G., Merchez, L., Abry, P., Barnier, J., Borgnat, P., Flandrin, P., Mallon, I. & Robardet, C. (2014). From bicycle sharing system movements to users: A typology of Vélo'v cyclists in Lyon based on large-scale behavioural dataset. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 280-291. Vogel, P. & Mattfeld, D. (2010). Modeling of repositioning activities in bike-sharing systems. Proceedings of 12th WCTR. Winters, M., Teschke, K., Grant, M., Setton, E. & Brauer, M. (2010). How far out of the way will we travel? Built environment influences on route selection for bicycle and car travel. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2190, 1-10. Wood, J., Slingsby, A. & Dykes, J. (2011). Visualizing the dynamics of London’s bicycle hire scheme. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 46(4), 239-251. Woodcock, J., Givoni, M. & Morgan, A. (2013). Health impact modelling of active travel visions for England and Wales using an integrated transport and health impact modelling tool (ITHIM). PLoS One 8, e51462. Zaltz Austwick, M., O’Brien, O., Strano, E. & Viana, M. (2013). The structure of spatial networks and communities in bicycle sharing systems. PLoS ONE 8, e74685. Zhang, M. (2004). The role of land use in travel mode choice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), 344-360. Zhao, P. (2014). The impact of the built environment on bicycle commuting: Evidence from Beijing. Urban Studies, 51(5), 1019-1037. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50726 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 公共自行車系統(public bike system, PBS)作為都市內之公共非機動綠色運具,有助於降低機動運具造成的交通壅塞、石化能源消耗、廢氣排放與公共衛生的負面影響,且相對於一般自行車有短時間租借、不用保養、停放方便和轉乘的優勢。公共自行車過去的研究多是在基本特性、車輛配置與站點選址、流量時空分布和使用者特性方面,對於「建成環境」的影響,則著墨較少。
本研究之目的在於了解建成環境對捷運使用者轉乘使用公共自行車的影響。並使用個體研究取徑探討其影響。首先,針對相關文獻分成「建成環境與私人自行車使用」與「公共自行車使用影響因素」兩個主題進行回顧,之後再進一步透過個案訪談佐證因果關係以提出理論假說。為了驗證假說關係,本研究挑選了臺北市信義區捷運101/世貿站、捷運象山站、捷運永春站和捷運市政府站為調查空間範疇,以問卷調查資料做為樣本,了解實際公共自行車使用的旅運行為。再以主成份分析、二項羅吉特模式和潛在類別模式進行分析。 研究結果證實建成環境7Ds特性(密度、多樣性、設計、離大眾運輸場站距離、迄點可及性、日常交通狀況和公共自行車站分布)會影響公共自行車使用,並且在轉乘的前段旅次和後段旅次的影響效果有所不同。潛在類別模式發現在總旅次中沒有汽車駕照但擁有私人自行車的年輕男性群體較會受到特定的建成環境影響,而在前段旅次和後段旅次上也可分別將樣本分為三個和兩個不同的群體,其分別受到不同的建成環境所影響。與過去相關文獻比較發現,公共自行車受到商業土地使用比例、離捷運站距離、旅次距離、性別和運具持有(私人自行車、機車、汽車)的影響與私人自行車相異;研究結果也證實7Ds特性相較於過去的5Ds(密度、多樣性、設計、離大眾運輸場站距離和迄點可及性)能更完整地顯示影響公共自行車使用的建成環境特徵。本研究使用個體研究取徑,其與過去文獻採用總體研究取徑的相異之處主要呈現在居住密度上,不同於過去總體研究認為居民越多,公共自行車使用越多的論點,個體研究取徑從個人旅運的角度來看,發現借還車的便利性考量,會使得居住密度負向地影響公共自行車使用;此外,個體研究取徑相較於總體,能進一步量測到旅運者在其實際旅行起迄點和旅行路線上之建成環境,以更細緻地探討建成環境對旅運行為的影響關係;最後,透過潛在類別模式的分析,本研究證實個體在建成環境對公共自行車使用的選擇偏好是異質性的,而非過去的同質性假設。除了補足過去文獻的不足之外,本研究依據實證關係進一步提出二項建立公共自行車友善都市的都市規劃策略之建議供市政規劃單位參考,以達到都市永續發展之目的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | A public bike system (PBS) is a public transport system and a green mode in urban areas. It can reduce traffic congestions, fossil fuel consumptions, air pollutions and other negative impacts of using motorized modes on public health. In addition, compared with private bikes, using public bikes has several advantages, such as short-time usage, being free of maintaining cost, and easily transferring and parking. The previous PBS studies mostly explored basic features, rental station distribution planning, spatio-temporal analysis, and users’ characteristic; however, affecting of built environment have not been comprehensively explored.
This study explored the influences of built environment on metro passagers’ public bike usage via a disaggregate approach. This study reviewed two topics of previous studies including “the influences of built environment on private bike usage” and “affecting factors of public bike usage”, and interviewed various stakeholders to develop hypothetical relationships. To verify the hypotheses, this study selected four metro stations in Xinyi District, Taipei, Taiwan to conduct questionnaire surveys and used principal components analysis, binary logit models and latent class models to analyze the sample data. The empirical evidence reveals that the 7Ds of built environment attributes (density, diversity, design, distance to transit, destination accessibility, daily traffic condition, and distribution of PBS) affected public bike usage, and the effects varied between first mile trips and last mile trips. Latent class model analysis reveals that in whole trips, younger males who did not have driving license of cars but owned bikes were affected more by specific built environment, and in first mile trips and last mile trips, each of they were classified into three and two different groups and were affected by different built environment respectively. Compared with previous studies, this study makes the following contributions. First, the effects of commercial land use, distance to metro stations, travel distance, gender and vehicle ownership on public bike usage are different from that on private bike usage. Second, the 7Ds attributes are more comprehensive than the 5Ds attributes (density, diversity, design, distance to transit, and destination accessibility) in term of explaining PBS usage. Third, the disaggregate approach in this study reaches novel and detailed findings that were never discovered by the aggregate approaches of the previous research. The aggregate approaches mostly conclude that increasing residential density increases PBS usage; however, in light of disaggregate views, it is inconvenient for residents renting and returning public bikes in dense areas and this study found a negative effect existing between residential density to PBS usage. Further, the disaggregate approach can measure built environment further detailed along a commuter’s origin, destination and route. Fourth, the latent class model analysis reveals that the choice preferences of built environment affecting public bike usage are heterogeneous, and that are different from previous studies’ homogenous assumptions. This study not only filled previous research gaps but also applied the results to develop PBS-friendly urban planning strategies for local governments in order to achieve sustainable city developments. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:54:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03228016-1.pdf: 6170581 bytes, checksum: 6cf5ff46a565f76445be0959eae3d8cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝誌 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究範疇 6 第三節 研究流程與內容 11 第四節 研究方法 15 第二章 文獻回顧 19 第一節 建成環境與私人自行車使用 19 第二節 公共自行車使用影響因素 32 第三節 綜合評析 43 第三章 研究設計 47 第一節 課題研析 48 第二節 假說研提 57 第三節 分析方法 95 第四章 資料調查與分析 113 第一節 問卷調查與資料蒐集 114 第二節 敘述統計分析 123 第三節 相關分析 136 第五章 實證分析 151 第一節 模式估計 152 第二節 假說驗證 168 第三節 意涵討論 188 第六章 結論與建議 203 第一節 結論 203 第二節 建議 210 參考文獻 213 附錄一:訪談紀錄 219 附錄二:問卷調查設計內容 259 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建成環境對公共自行車使用之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Influences of Built Environment on Public Bike Usage | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 衛萬明(Wann-Ming Wey),李家儂(Chia-Nung Li) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 建成環境,公共自行車,主成份分析,羅吉特模式,潛在類別模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | built environment,public bike,principal components analysis,logit model,latent class model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 262 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600967 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。