請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47424
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 袁孝維(Hsiao-Wei Yuan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hui-Ping Hsieh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 謝惠冰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:59:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 翁伊珊。2007。藪鳥二重唱行為功能。國立臺灣大學碩士論文。
陳湘靜。2009。冠羽畫眉生蛋期競爭策略。國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 蔡育倫。2005。藪鳥 (Liocichla steerii) 鳴唱聲的地理變異。國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 謝仲甫。2005。梅峰地區藪鳥重唱行為研究。國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 羅柳墀。1987。溪頭地區藪鳥的生物學研究。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文。 Anderson, R. C., Searcy, W. A. & Nowicki, S. 2005. Partial song matching in an eastern population of Song Sparrows, Melospiza melodia. Animal Behaviour, 69, 189–196. Arcese, P. 1987. Age, intrusion pressure and defence against floaters by territorial male Song Sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 35, 773–784. Ballentine, B., Searcy, W. A. & Nowicki, S. 2008. Reliable aggressive signalling in Swamp Sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 75, 693–703. Baptista, L. F. 1996. Nature and its nurturing in avian vocal development. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. (Ed. by Kroodsma, D. E. and E. H. Miller), Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 39–60. Beecher, M. D., Stoddard, P. K., Campbell, S. E. & Horning, C. L. 1996. Repertoire matching between neighbouring Song Sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 51, 917–923. Beecher, M. D., Nordby, J. C., Campbell, S. E., Burt, J. M., Hill, C. E. & O'Loghlen, A. L. 1997. What is the function of song learning in songbirds? In: Perspectives in Ethology. Vol. 12: Communication (Ed. by Owings, D. H., M. D. Beecher and N. S. Thompson), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 77–97. Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E., Burt, J. M., Hill, C. E. & Nordby, J. C. 2000a. Song-type matching between neighbouring Song Sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 59, 21–27. Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E. & Nordby, J. C. 2000b. Territory tenure in Song Sparrows is related to song sharing with neighbours, but not to repertoire size. Animal Behaviour, 59, 29–37. Beecher, M. D. & Brenowitz, E. A. 2005. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 143–149. Beecher, M. D. & Campbell, S. E. 2005. The role of unshared songs in singing interactions between neighbouring Song Sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 70, 1297–1304. Brindley, E. L. 1991. Response of European Robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping. Animal Behaviour, 41, 503–512. Brown, E. D. & Farabaugh, S. M. 1997. What birds with complex social relationships can tell us about vocal learning: vocal sharing in avian groups. In: Social Influences on Vocal Development. (Ed. by Snowdon, C. T. and M. Hausberger), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 98–127. Burt, J. M., Campbell, S. E. & Beecher, M. D. 2001. Song type matching as threat: a test using interactive playback. Animal Behaviour, 62, 1163–1170. Burt, J. M., Bard, S. C., Campbell, S. E. & Beecher, M. D. 2002. Alternative forms of song matching in Song Sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 63, 1143–1151. Collins, S. 2004. Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong. (Ed. by Marler, P. and H. Slabbekoorn), Academic Press, New York, pp. 39–79. Dabelsteen, T. 1992. Interactive playback: a finely tuned response. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication. (Ed. by McGregor, P. K.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 97–109. Dabelsteen, T., McGregor, P. K., Holland, J., Tobias, J. A. & Pedersen, S. B. 1997. The signal function of overlapping singing in male Robins. Animal Behaviour, 53, 249–256. Falls, J. B., Krebs, J. R. & Mcgregor, P. K. 1982. Song matching in the Great Tit (Parus major): the effect of similarity and familiarity. Animal Behaviour, 30, 997–1009. Falls, J. B. 1985. Song matching in Western Meadowlarks. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 2520–2524. Falls, J. B. 1992. Playback: A historical perspective. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication. (Ed. by McGregor, P. K.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 11–33. Fitzsimmons, L. P., Foote, J. R., Ratcliffe, L. M. & Mennill, D. J. 2008. Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of Black-capped Chickadees. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1913–1920. Getty, T. 1987. Dear enemies and the prisoner's dilemma: why should territorial neighbors form defensive coalitions? American Zoologist, 27, 327–336. Hall, M. L. 2004. A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 415–430. Hall, M. L. 2009. A review of vocal duetting in birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 40, 67–121. Hinde, R. A. 1958. Alternative motor patterns in Chaffinch song. Animal Behaviour, 6, 211–218. Hughes, M., Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. A. & Peters, S. 1998. Song-type sharing in Song Sparrows: implications for repertoire function and song learning. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 437–446. Hughes, M., Anderson, R. C., Searcy, W. A., Bottensek, L. M. & Nowicki, S. 2007. Song type sharing and territory tenure in eastern Song Sparrows: implications for the evolution of song repertoires. Animal Behaviour, 73, 701–710. Kilham, L. 1974. Early breeding season behavior of Downy Woodpeckers. The Wilson Bulletin, 86, 407–418. Kilham, L. 1977. Early breeding season behavior of Red-headed Woodpeackers. Auk, 94, 231–239. Krebs, J. R., Ashcroft, R. & Orsdol, K. V. 1981. Song matching in the Great Tit Parus major L. Animal Behaviour, 29, 918–923. Kroodsma, D. E. & Canady, R. A. 1985. Differences in repertoire size, singing behavior, and associated neuroanatomy among Marsh Wren populations have a genetic basis. Auk, 102, 439–446. Kroodsma, D. E. 1996. Ecology of passerine song develpoment. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. (Ed. by Kroodsma, D. E. and E. H. Miller), Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 3–19. Kroodsma, D. E., Liu, W. C., Goodwin, E. & Bedell, P. A. 1999. The ecology of song improvisation as illustrated by North American Sedge Wrens. Auk, 116, 373–386. Kroodsma, D. E. 2004. The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong. (Ed. by Marler, P. and H. Slabbekoorn), Academic Press, New York, pp.108–131. Lambrechts, M. & Dhondt, A. A. 1988. The anti-exhaustion hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the Great Tit. Animal Behaviour, 36, 327–334. Langemann, U., Tavares, J. P., Peake, T. M. & McGregor, P. K. 2000. Response of Great Tits to escalating patterns of playback. Behaviour, 137, 451–471. Lemon, R. E. 1968. The relation between organization and function of song in Cardinals. Behaviour, 32, 158–177. Mann, N. I., Marshall-Ball, L. & Slater, P. J. B. 2003. The complex song duet of the Plain Wren. Condor, 105, 672–682. Marshall-Ball, L. & Slater, P. J. B. 2004. Duet singing and repertoire use in threat signalling of individuals and pairs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 440–443. Mays, H. L., Doucet, S. M., Yao, C. T. & Yuan, H. W. 2006a. Sexual dimorphism and dichromatism in Steere's Liocichla (Liocichla steerii). Journal of Field Ornithology, 77, 437–443. Mays, H. L., Yao, C. T. & Yuan, H. W. 2006b. Antiphonal duetting in Steere's Liocichla (Liocichla steerii): male song individuality and correlation between habitat and duetting behavior. Ecological Research, 21, 311–314. McGregor, P. K., Krebs, J. R. & Perrins, C. M. 1981. Song repertoire and lifetime reproductive success in the Great Tit (Parus major). The American Naturalist, 118, 149–159. Mennill, D. J. & Ratcliffe, L. 2004. Overlapping and matching in the song contests of Black-capped Chickadees. Animal Behaviour, 67, 441–450. Molles, L. E. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 2001. Songbird cheaters pay a retaliation cost: evidence for auditory conventional signals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2013–2019. Morton, E. S. & Young, K. 1986. A previously underscribed method of song matching in a species with a single song 'type', the Kentucky Warbler (Oporornis formosus). Ethology, 73, 334–342. Naguib, M. & Todt, D. 1997. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in Nightingales. Animal Behaviour, 54, 1535–1543. Nelson, D. A. 1998. Geographic variation in song of Gambel's White-crowned Sparrow. Behaviour, 135, 321–342. Nielsen, B. M. B. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1995. Responses of Songs Sparrows to song-type matching via interactive playback. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 109–117. Nottebohm, F. 1972. The origins of vocal learning. The American Naturalist, 106, 116–140. Otter, K. A., Ratcliffe, L., Njegovan, M. & Fotheringham, J. 2002. Importance of frequency and temporal song matching in Black-capped Chickadees: Evidence from interactive playback. Ethology, 108, 181–191. Rogers, A. C., Mulder, R. A. & Langmore, N. E. 2006. Duet duels: sex differences in song matching in duetting eastern whipbirds. Animal Behaviour, 72, 53–61. Searcy, W. A., Nowicki, S. & Hogan, C. 2000. Song type variants and aggressive context. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 358–363. Searcy, W. A., Anderson, R. C. & Nowicki, S. 2006. Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 234–241. Slater, P. J. B. & Mann, N. I. 2004. Why do the females of many bird species sing in the tropics? Journal of Avian Biology, 35, 289–294. Soma, M., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. & Okanoya, K. 2009. Song-learning strategies in the Bengalese Finch: do chicks choose tutors based on song complexity? Animal Behaviour, 78, 1107–1113. Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Horning, C. L. & Campbell, S. E. 1991. Recognition of individual neighbors by song in the Song Sparrow, a species with song repertoires. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 211–215. Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E. & Horning, C. L. 1992. Song-type matching in the Song Sparrow. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 1440–1444. Temeles, E. J. 1994. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? Animal Behaviour, 47, 339–350. Todt, D. & Naguib, M. 2000. Vocal interactions birds: The use of song as a model in communication. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 29, 247–296. Vehrencamp, S. L. 2001. Is song-type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 1637–1642. Vehrencamp, S. L., Hall, M. L., Bohman, E. R., Depeine, C. D. & Dalziell, A. H. 2007. Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the Banded Wren: the sender's perspective. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 849–859. Wheelwright, N. T., Swett, M. B., Levin, I. I., Kroodsma, D. E., Freeman-Gallant, C. R. & Williams, H. 2008. The influence of different tutor types on song learning in a natural bird population. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1479–1493. Wilson, P. L., Towner, M. C. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 2000. Survival and song-type sharing in a sedentary subspecies of the Song Sparrow. Condor, 102, 355–363. Wright, T. F. & Dorin, M. 2001. Pair duets in the Yellow-naped Amazon (Psittaciformes : Amazona auropalliata): Responses to playbacks of different dialects. Ethology, 107, 111–124. Yuan, H. W., Liu, M. & Shen, S. F. 2004. Joint nesting in Taiwan Yuhinas: A rare passerine case. Condor, 106, 862–872. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47424 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文包含兩個章節,第一章為文獻回顧,敘述鳥類學習歌曲之假說,多數鳴禽擁有許多不同之歌型 (song type) 與曲目 (song repertoire),而且學習歌曲時會產生各種歌曲分享以及歌曲對應的行為介紹。第二章內容為在過去的研究發現,許多共域鳴禽之間會展現歌曲對應 (song matching),包括歌型對應 (song type matching) 及曲目對應 (repertoire matching) 行為。威脅假說 (threat hypothesis) 是認為當個體發出歌型對應行為是意味著增加攻擊的可能性,然而許多相關研究侷限於只有雄鳥會鳴唱的鳴禽,並未對雌鳥也會鳴唱的鳴禽多加探討。本研究目的有二,測試威脅假說,以及探討歌曲對應行為在二重唱鳥種的性別是否有差異。本研究於2008年4至8月在南投梅峰地區,探討具有二重唱行為之藪鳥 (Liocichla steerii) 的歌型對應行為,針對12對個體以鄰居與陌生雄鳥之分享歌型進行互動式回播實驗,分別於繁殖季前期 (築巢、孵蛋) 與後期 (育雛) 試驗,並記錄雄鳥回應之歌型、反應時間、鳴唱次數、音節時間、重疊率、轉換率與個體接近喇叭的行為,以及雌鳥之回應有無、反應時間、二重唱比例等參數。結果發現有歌型對應與無歌型對應之試驗相比較,有歌型對應之雄鳥反應時間顯著較短 (23.3±3.7 vs. 100.9±10.1秒)、鳴唱次數顯著較多 (23.5±3.6 vs. 7.6±1.1次) 且個體與喇叭距離顯著較短 (2.9±0.5 vs. 9.1±1.1公尺);回播陌生歌曲比回播鄰居歌曲之歌型對應比例顯著較高 (64.3 vs. 28.6%)、雌雄鳥反應時間顯著較短 (雌:55.6±9.2 vs. 71.3±8.1秒;雄:32.9±7.5 vs. 90.8±11.4秒) 、二重唱比例較高 (53 vs. 47%) 與顯著較接近喇叭 (4.4±0.8 vs. 7.7±1公尺);繁殖季前後期相比較,前期之歌型對應比例顯著較高 (75 vs. 26.1%)、雌雄鳥反應時間均顯著較短 (雌:45±4.1 vs. 78.6±8.5秒;雄:34.8±6.1 vs. 84.8±11.6秒)、二重唱比例較高 (78 vs. 27%) 且個體也顯著較接近喇叭 (4±0.7 vs. 7.5±0.9公尺)。而雌鳥接唱比例於回播陌生與鄰居歌曲 (71.4 vs. 47.6%)、繁殖季前、後期 (75 vs. 47.8%) 均無顯著差異,但當雄鳥進行歌型對應時,雌鳥接唱的比例顯著較高 (86.7 vs. 35%)、二重唱比例也顯著較多 (66 vs. 20%)。本研究證實了藪鳥雄鳥之歌型對應行為與雌鳥接唱形成二重唱之行為均為具有威脅意圖之訊息,符合威脅假說,且雄鳥會因陌生歌曲回播與繁殖季前期之領域威脅較大,選擇歌型對應來回應領域入侵者,而雌鳥則視雄鳥歌型對應比例的高低來調整接唱與否。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The thesis consists of two chapters. The first chapter is literature review. It is about the song learning hypothesis of songbirds, as well as different conditions of song sharing during song learning. The second chapter is as it is described in the following paragraphs. Basically, most songbirds have many song types and song repertoires. In the previous studies, song type matching and repertoire matching had been reported in songbirds who shared territories. According to the threat hypothesis, individuals who have the song type matching behavior would increase the likelihood of an attack on the singing intruder. Most studies focused on male-singing species, but not on female-singing species. In this thesis, I tested the threat hypothesis and investigated the differences of song matching between male and female birds. I carried out an interactive playback study on a duetting species, Steere’s Liocichla (Liocichla steerii), to investigate the song type matching in the territorial interaction. Playbacks were carried out to 12 pairs of Steere’s Liocichla at Meifeng in Nantou during their breeding season from April to August in 2008. We broadcasted the shared song types of neighbor and stranger across breeding stages (early stage: nesting and incubation, late stage: nestling and fledgling), and recorded male responses including song type, latency to sing, number of repeated song types, song frequency, overlapping rate, switching rate and the distance to the loudspeaker, as well as different female responses which includes whether an female bird answered or not as well as their latency to sing and duetting rate. We compared the responses of matching type answered and non-matched. In the answered-matching type, male showed shorter latency on singing (23.3±3.7 vs. 100.9±10.1 sec.), more frequency of song repeated (23.5±3.6 vs. 7.6±1.1) and the proximity to the loudspeaker (2.9±0.5 vs. 9.1±1.1m). Compared to the playback responses of stranger song and neighbor song, the former had higher percentage of type matching (64.3 vs. 28.6%), both males and females had shorter singing latency (male: 32.9±7.5 vs. 90.8±11.4 sec.; female: 55.6±9.2 vs. 71.3±8.1 sec.), higher percentage of duetting rate (53 vs. 47%) and males were closer to the loudspeaker (4.4±0.8 vs. 7.7±1 m). Moreover, we compared the responses early and late in the breeding stages, and the result showed that there were higher percentage of type matching behavior early in the breeding stage (75 vs. 26.1%).Both males and females had shorter singing latency (male: 34.8±6.1 vs. 84.8±11.6 sec.; female: 45±4.1 vs. 78.6±8.5 sec.), higher percentage of duetting rate (78 vs. 27%) and male was closer to the loudspeaker (4±0.7 vs. 7.5±0.9 m) early in the breeding stage. As for the female duet behavior, there was no significant difference between the response to stranger and neighbor playback (71.4 vs. 47.6%). The female duetting behavior also showed no significant difference between two breeding stages (75 vs. 47.8%). Female answer rate (86.7 vs. 35%) and duetting behavior (66 vs. 20%) was significant higher when their mates showed the type matching behavior. In conclusion, the ‘song type matching behavior’ from males and the ‘duetting behavior’ from females point to a threat intention in Steere’s Liocichla. Playback early in the breeding stage and the strangers’ voice are threatening to males. Therefore, males would choose’ type matching behavior’ to responsed to intruders. As for the females, the frequency of duetting behavior is affected by males’ type matching behaviors. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:59:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96625056-1.pdf: 809659 bytes, checksum: d066921f718e7c46affc99ed6319ba70 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書.....................I
謝辭................................II 中文摘要............................IV Abstract............................VI 目錄................................IX 表次................................XI 圖次...............................XII 第一章:文獻回顧.....................1 鳥類的聲音.........................1 歌曲學習假說.......................1 曲目量假說.......................2 分享假說.........................3 歌曲分享:方言和歌曲對應...........3 方言.............................4 歌曲對應.........................4 引用文獻...........................8 第二章:梅峰地區藪鳥歌型對應行為....14 前言..............................14 研究方法..........................17 實驗地點........................17 實驗對象........................17 個體標示與試驗前作業............18 回播方法之選擇..................18 回播裝置及程序..................19 反應測量........................20 資料分析........................21 結果..............................23 雄鳥聲音反應....................23 雌鳥聲音反應....................25 行為反應........................25 各個參數之交互關聯..............26 討論..............................29 引用文獻..........................34 表................................39 圖................................42 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 梅峰地區藪鳥歌型對應行為 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Song Type Matching in a Duetting Species, Steere’s Liocichla (Liocichla steerii) at Meifeng Area | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許鈺鸚,謝寶森,丁宗蘇,許富雄 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 藪鳥,二重唱,威脅假說,歌型對應, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | duetting,threat hypothesis,song type matching, | en |
dc.relation.page | 53 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 790.68 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。