請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4665
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張國鎮(Kuo-Chun Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Jen Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉俊仁 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T17:44:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-27 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T17:44:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 姚乃嘉,黃榮堯,葉啟章,蔡閔光,「第二代台灣地區橋梁管理資訊系統建置規畫」,交通運輸研究所,2013
[2] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Fifth Edition” 2010. [3] Andrzej S. Nowak. “Calibration of LRFD Bridge Code” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 8, 1995. [4] Zach Liang, and George C. Lee. “Bridge Pier Failure Probabilities under Combined Hazard Effects of Scour, Truck and Earthquake. Part I: Occurrence Probabilities” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 12, Issue 2. 2013. [5] Zach Liang, and George C. Lee. “Bridge Pier Failure Probabilities under Combined Hazard Effects of Scour, Truck and Earthquake. Part II: Failure Probabilities” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 12, Issue 2. 2013. [6] Zach Liang. “Principles and Approaches for Multi-Hazard (MH) LRFD” 7th National Seismic Conference on Bridge and Highways. Keynote Speech, 2013. [7] Zach Liang, and George C. Lee. “Towards multiple hazard resilient bridges a methodology for modeling frequent and infrequent time-varying loads Part I” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 11, Issue 3. 2012. [8] Zach Liang, and George C. Lee. “Towards multiple hazard resilient bridges a methodology for modeling frequent and infrequent time-varying loads Part II” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 11, Issue 3. 2012. [9] 財團法人台灣營建研究院,「鐵路橋梁過河沖刷段橋墩與基礎結構系統檢測技術之研究」, 2008。 [10] 台灣世曦工程顧問股份有限公司,「橋墩即時沖刷深度警戒值與行動值之研訂」,2010。 [11] Shirole, A. M., and R. C. Holt. “Planning for a Comprehensive Bridge Safety Assurance Program” Transportation Research Record 1290, 1991. [12] Parker, Gene W., Lisa Bratton, and David S. Armstrong. “Stream Stability and Scour Assessments at Bridges in Massachusetts” The Survey, 1997. [13] 林呈,「本省西部重要河川橋梁橋基災害分析與橋基保護工法資料庫系統之建立」,交通部運輸研究所專題研究計畫成果報告,1998。 [14] Jean-Louis Briaud, Francis C. K. Ting, H. C. Chen, Rao Gudavalli, Suresh Perugu, and Gengsheng Wei. “SRICOS: Prediction of Scour Rate in Cohesive Soils at Bridge Piers” Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 4, 1999. [15] Laura C. Bolduc, Paolo Gardoni, and Jean-Louis Briaud. “Probability of Exceedance Estimates for Scour Depth around Bridge Piers” Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 2, February 1, 2008. [16] 交通部,「公路排水設計規範」,2008。 [17] Peggy A. Johnson, and Daniel A. Dock. “Probabilistic Bridge Scour Estimates” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 7, 1998. [18] Jean-Louis Briaud, Paolo Gardoni, and Congpu Yao. “Statistical, Risk, and Reliability Analyses of Bridge Scour” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 140, No. 2. 2014. [19] Azadeh Alipour, Behrouz Shafei, and Masanobu Shinozuka. “Reliability-Based Calibration of Load and Resistance Factors for Design of RC Bridges under Multiple Extreme Events: Scour and Earthquake” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 5, May 1, 2013. [20] Alfredo H-S. Ang, Wilson H. Tang. “Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Volume I-Basic Principles” Wiley, 1975. [21] 沈明毅,「樁基礎縮尺橋梁模型之沖刷易損性曲線建置試驗研究」,國立台灣大學碩士論文,2013。 [22] 台灣高鐵,「高鐵設施容許變形值一覽表」,2011。 [23] FHWA “Principles of Multiple-Hazard Design for Highway Bridges”, 2013 [24] 陳能鴻,「單垮樁基礎橋梁模型之振動台實驗研究」,國立台灣大學碩士論文,2013。 [25] ASTM Standard D3080-98. “Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions” Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000. [26] ASTM Standard D4253-93. “Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils using a Vibration Test” Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000. [27] ASTM Standard D4254-91. “Standard Test Methods for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density” Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000. [28] Applied Technology Council ATC-32. “Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations” Redwood City, California. [29] 蔡益超,「公路橋梁耐震性能設計規範研究」,交通部臺灣區國道新建工程局,2011。 [30] Ghosn, M., F. Moses, & Wang, J. “NCHRP Report 489: Design of Highway Bridges for Extreme Events” Transportation Research Board, 2003. [31] Yin-Nan Huang. “Performance Assessment of Conventional and Base-isolated Nuclear Power Plants for Earthquake and Blast Loadings” ProQuest, 2008. [32] 陳志豪,「考量等效沖刷載重之橋梁可靠度設計方法研究」,國立台灣大學碩士論文,2014。 [33] A. Alipour. “Performance Assessment of Highway Bridges Under Earthquake and Scour Effect” , 2012. [34] 經濟部水利署中區水資源局,「大度攔河堰計畫管線工程詳細地況調查」,2009 [35] 交通部運輸研究所,「訂定跨河橋梁橋基沖刷檢測作業規範(草案)之研究」,2011 [36] 苟昌煥,「混凝土橋梁耐震能力評估與資料庫系統之建立」,中華大學碩士論文,2003。 [37] Reese, L. C., W. R. COX, AND F. D. KOOP, “Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand.” Proceeding, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, Vol. II, Paper No.2080, 1974, 99.473-484 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4665 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 對於跨河橋梁而言在各種造成橋梁發生破壞之原因中,國內外研究均指出沖刷現象為主要原因之一。而現有的橋梁設計規範中,尚未以載重型式針對沖刷效應進行適當設計考量,若考量多重災害之可靠度設計,應用載重抗力係數設計法時將產生設計載重型式不一致之困擾。本研究應用創新思維,將沖刷效應轉換為等值載重之形式,並將等值載重放入載重組合後,得到直接之設計方法。
本研究接續團隊歷年研究成果,由等效沖刷載重模式出發。將此等效沖刷作用載重模式應用至沖刷易損性曲線之建置及多重災害之載重抗力係數設計法中,盼能在考量沖刷事件之橋梁評估及設計提供幫助。以蒙地卡羅法進行亂數分析,配合條件機率計算橋梁破壞機率以建置沖刷易損性曲線;而多重災害之載重抗力係數設計法則以可靠度分析來完成。 建置出沖刷易損性曲線後,工程師可由沖刷易損性曲線迅速判斷橋梁沖刷深度所對應到的破壞機率。而多重災害之載重抗力係數設計法之載重係數,則使用在跨河橋梁設計上,以求合乎可靠度分析邏輯之設計流程。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | There are many reasons that make crossing bridge failure, Domestic and international studies have pointed out that one of the main reasons is scour event. In the existing bridge design codes, the scour effect is not considered as a load effect. When considering multiple-hazard reliability design, engineers will face the problem with load and resistance factor design which didn't consider scour effect as a load. This study offer a creative thinking that transfer the scour effect into load pattern and put in load combinations, obtain a more direct method of design.
The research team continues the previous results, start from the concept of equivalent scour load. We purposed two applications of equivalent scour load, one is build the scour fragility curve, the other is calculate the load factors of multiple-hazard load and resistance factor design. The objective is to help engineers to evaluate and design crossing bridge with scour event. Using Monte Carlo method to simulate hazard, and evaluate the bridge failure probability with the conditional probability. Finally we can get scour fragility curve. To calculate the load factors in multiple-hazard load and resistance factor design by reliability analysis. After develop scour fragility curve, engineers can quickly obtain the failure probability by scour depth. The load factor of multiple-hazard load and resistance factor design will be used in design crossing bridge, which make design procedure smoother. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:44:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02521245-1.pdf: 7132958 bytes, checksum: 7036725352d651e5e2580d807eb4851f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
摘要: III 英文摘要(ABSTRACT): V 目錄: VII 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 XII 符號說明: XIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1. 研究背景 1 1.2. 研究動機與目的 1 1.3. 研究流程與論文架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1. 橋梁沖刷破壞模式 7 2.2. 考量沖刷效應之橋梁設計方法 10 2.3. 等效沖刷作用載重模式 10 2.4. 結構可靠度分析與設計 13 2.5. 沖刷易損性曲線建置方法 21 第三章 等效沖刷載重模式 29 3.1. 前言: 29 3.2. 修正等效沖刷作用載重模式: 30 3.3. 小結 33 第四章 縮尺橋墩之土壤側向承載力實驗 45 4.1. 試驗目的 45 4.2. 試驗配置 45 4.3. 試驗結果 47 4.4. 小結 48 第五章 可靠度設計方法 66 5.1. 前言 66 5.2. 蒙地卡羅法 66 5.3. 機率分佈模式 66 5.4. 沖刷易損性曲線之建立 69 5.5. 載重係數計算方法 72 5.6. 小結 75 第六章 參考算例 88 6.1. 前言 88 6.2. 西濱大橋之參考算例 88 6.3. 小結 92 第七章 結論與建議 101 7.1. 結論 101 7.2. 建議與後續研究方向 102 參考文獻 104 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 受沖刷橋梁可靠度設計方法研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study on the Reliability-based Design Method for Scoured Bridges | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 田堯彰(Yao-Zhang Tian),黃尹男(Yin-Nan Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 橋梁沖刷,等效沖刷作用載重,沖刷易損性曲線,多重災害之載重抗力係數設計法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Bridge scour,Equivalent scour load,Scour fragility curve,Multi hazard-LRFD, | en |
dc.relation.page | 108 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf | 6.97 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。