請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44793
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 翁崇雄(Chorng-Shyong Ong) | |
dc.contributor.author | Po-Yen Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳伯彥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T03:55:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-07-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-06-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王淑端(民84),「企業資訊化支出與經營績效關係之實證硏究」,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
2. 巫亮全(民 97),「從實質選擇權觀點探討不確定環境下資訊科技投資之研究—以企業資源規劃系統為例」,國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。 3. 林文華(民92),「資訊科技投入程度、組織管理相關變數與組織績效之關聯性研究」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 4. 林東清(民 95),資訊管理-e化企業的核心競爭能力,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。 5. 唐永泰(民 93),「資訊科技投資與流程觀點的IT企業價值」,國立台北大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 6. 國立政治大學商學院台灣智慧資本硏究中心、資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心編著(民95),智慧資本管理,台北:華泰文化。 7. 陳品宏(民 93),「資訊科技投資對企業績效之關係研究」,國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 8. 陳美純(民 90),「資訊科技投資與智慧資本對企業績效影響之研究」,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。 9. 陳謝裕(民 89),「企業競爭的核心:IT Capability─構面的探討與衡量尺度的建立」,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 10. 黃國彰(民96),「各項選股指標於台灣股票市場的實用性探討--應用對象與應用時機之研究」,國立台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 11. 謝清佳,吳琮璠(民98),資訊管理理論與實務,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。 12. 劉上旗(民95),「台灣股市本益比之影響因素及投資績效分析」,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 13. Amit, R., and Schoemaker , P. H. 'Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent,' Strategic Management Journal (14), 1993, pp. 33-46. 14. Barney, J.B. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, ” Journal of Management(17:1), 1991, pp. 99-120. 15. Barua, A., Kriebel, H. C., and Mukhopadhyay, T. 'Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation,' Information Systems Research (6:1), 1995, pp. 3-23. 16. Bender, D.H. “Financial Impact of Information Processing,” Journal of Management Information Systems (3:2), 1986, pp. 22-32. 17. Bharadwaj, A. S. “A Resource-based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation,” MIS Quarterly (24: 1), 2000, pp. 169-196. 18. Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., and Konsynski, B. “Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin’s q,” Management Science (45:7), 1999, pp. 1008-1024. 19. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. M. “Beyond the Productivity Paradox,” Communications of the ACM (41:8), 1998, pp. 49-55. 20. Carr, N.G. “IT Doesn’t Matter,” Harvard Business Review, 2003 May, pp.41-49. 21. Chircu, A.M., and Kauffman, R.J. “Limits to Value in Electronic Commerce-Related IT Investments,” Journal of Management Information Systems (17:2), 2000, pp.59-80. 22. Choi, B. ,and Jong, M. “Assessing the impact of knowledge management strategies announcements on the market value of firms,” Information & Management 47,2010, pp.42-52. 23. Clement, A. and Gotlieb, C.C. “Evaluation of an Organizational Interface: The New Business Department at a Large Insurance Firm,” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems (5:4), 1987, pp.328-339. 24. Clemons, E. K. 'Corporate Strategies for Information Technology: A Resource-Based Approach,' Computer (24:11), 1991, pp.23-32. 25. Clemons, E. K. 'Information Systems for Sustainable Competitive Advantage,' Information & Management (11:3), 1986, pp. 131-136. 26. Clemons, E. K., and Row, M. C. 'Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences,' MIS Quarterly (15:3), 1991, pp. 275-294. 27. Davern, M.J. and Kauffman, R.J. “Discovering Potential and Realizing Value from Information Technology Investments,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:4), 2000, pp.121-143. 28. Davis, L., Dehning, B., and Stratopoulos, T. “ Does the Market Recognize IT-enabled Competitive Advantage,” Information & Management (40:7), 2003, pp.705-716. 29. Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., and Kraemer, K. L. “Information Technology and Economic Performance: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence,” ACM Computing Surveys (35:1), 2003, pp. 1-28. 30. Dehning,B. , Richardson,V.J., and Zmud, R.W. “The Financial Performance Effects of IT-Based Supply Chain Management Systems in Manufacturing Firms,” Journal of Operations Management(25:4), 2007, pp.806-824. 31. Deise, M.V., Nowilow, C., King, P., and Wright,A. “Executive’s Guide to e-Business: From Tactics to Strategy,” Price water house coopers L L P., 2000. 32. Dewan, S. and Ren, F. “Risk and Return of Information Technology Initiatives: Evidence from Electronic Commerce Announcements,” Information Systems Research (18:4), 2007, pp.370-394. 33. Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage,” Management Science (35:12), 1989, pp.1504-1511. 34. Eikebrokk, T.R., and Olsen, D.H. “An Empirical Investigation of Competency Factors Affecting E-Business Success in European SMEs,” Information & Management (44:4), 2007, pp.364-383. 35. “FedEx Corp.: Structural Transformation through E-Business,” The Asia Case Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong,2000. 36. Feeny, D.F. and Ives, B. “In Search of Sustainability: Reaping Long-Term Advantage from Investments in Information Technology,” Journal of Management InformationS ystems (7:1), Summer1 990, pp. 27-46. 37. Grant, R. M. “The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage,” California Management Review (33:3), 1991, pp. 114-35. 38. Harris, S.E. and Katz, J.L. “Predicting Organizational Performance Using Information Technology Managerial Control Ratios,” Proceeding of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science 4,1991, pp.197-204. 39. Hitt, L., and Brynjolfsson, E. “Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value,” MIS Quarterly (20:2), 1996, pp. 121-142. 40. Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, G.R. “Strategic Management Theory,” Houghton Mifflin Press, New York, 2008. 41. Kettinger, W. J., Grover, V., Guha, S., and Segars, A.H. “Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance, ” MIS Quarterly (18:1), 1994, pp. 31-58. 42. Kivijarvi, H. and Sannrien,T. “Investment in Information Systems and the Financial Performance of the Firm” Information & Management (28:2), 1995, pp. 143-163. 43. Kohli, R. and Devaraj, S. “Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empirical Research,” Information Systems Research (14:2), 2003, pp.127-145. 44. Laudon, K.C. and Laudon J.P. “Management Information Systems,” Pearson Press, 2010. 45. Lucas, H. “Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox: Assessing the Value of Investing in IT,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1999. 46. Martinsons, M.G., and Martinsons, V. “Rethinking the Value of IT, Again” Communication of the ACM (45:7), 2002, pp.25-26. 47. Mata, F.J., Fuerst, W.L., and Barney, J.B. “Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis, ” MIS Quarterly(19: 4), 1995, pp. 487-505. 48. McAfee, A., and Brynjolfsson, E. “Investing in the IT That Makes a Competitive Difference,” Harvard Business Review (86:7/8), 2008, pp.98-107. 49. McFarlan, F.W. “Information Technology Changes the Way You Compete,” Harvard Business Review (62:3), 1984, pp.98-103. 50. Melville, N. , Kraemer, K. , and Gurbaxani, V. “ Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: an Integrative Model of IT Business Value, ” MIS Quarterly(28: 2), 2004, pp. 283-322. 51. Miller, M.H., and Modigliani, F. “Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares,” The Journal of Business (34:4), 1961, pp.411-433. 52. Mooney, J.G., Gurbaxani, V., and Kraemer, K.L. “A Process Oriented Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology, ” Database for Advances in Information Systems (27:2), 1996, pp.68-81. 53. Poter, M. E., and Miller, V.E. “How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage, ” Harvard Business Review (63:4), 1985, pp.149-160. 54. Powell, T.C., and Dent-Micallef, A. “Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources,” Strategic Management Journal (18:5), 1997, pp.375-405. 55. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G., “The Core Competence of the Organization,” Harvard Business Review (68:3), 1990, pp.79-93. 56. Ranganathan, C. and Brown, C.V. “ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables,” Information Systems Research (17:2), 2006, pp.145-161. 57. Ray, G., Muhanna, and W.A., Barney, J., “Information Technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis”, MIS Quarterly (29:4), 2005, pp. 625-651. 58. Rosenthal, R. “Replication in Behavioral Research,” in Replication Research in the Social Sciences, J.W. Neuliep(ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1991, pp. 1-30. 59. Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., and Goodhue, D. L. “Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets,” Sloan Management Review (38:1), 1996, pp. 31-42. 60. Russo, M. V., and Fouts, P. A. 'A Resource-based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability,' Academy of Management Journal (40:3), 1997, pp. 534-59. 61. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. S., and Grover, V. “Shaping Agility Through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing The Role of Information Technology in Contemporary, ” MIS Quarterly (27: 2), 2003, pp. 237-263. 62. Santhanam, R. , and Hartono, E. “Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance,” MIS Quarterly (27: 1), 2003, pp. 125-153. 63. Schendel, D. 'Introduction to Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally Based Theory of Competitive Advantage,' Strategic Management Journal (15), 1994, pp. 1-4. 64. Sircar, S., Turnbow, J.L., and Bordoloi, B. “A Framework for Assessing the Relationship Between Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:4), 2000, pp.66-97. 65. Soh, C., and Markus, M. L. 'How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis,' in Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, J. I. DeGross, G. Ariav, C. Beath, R. Hoyer, and C. Kemerer (eds.), Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 29-41. 66. Stoel, M.D. and Muhanna W.A. “IT Capabilities and Firm Performance: a Contingency Analysis of the Role of Industry and IT Capability Type,” Information & Management (46:4), 2009, pp181-189. 67. Stratopoulos, T., and Dehning, B., “Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox?,” Information & Management (38 :2), 2000, pp.103–117. 68. Tsang, E.W.K., and Kwan, K. M. “Replication and Theory Development in Organizational Science: A Critical Realist Perspective,” Academy of Management Review (24:4), 1999, pp.759-780. 69. Weill, P, and Qlson, M. H. “Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications,” MIS Quarterly (13:1), 1989, pp. 2-17. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44793 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 資源基礎觀點被廣泛使用來解決IT投資與企業績效的生產力矛盾議題,研究者認為企業藉由投資創造優異的IT能力,進而提高企業績效。然而績效僅能表現出現在與過去的成果,並無法反映企業未來的營運情況,但IT對企業的影響是持續性且能帶來成長機會的,若只採用績效來衡量是會低估資訊科技所帶來的價值,進而影響到企業主對於資訊科技的投資意願與決策。
然而根據評價理論,企業價值包含正常盈餘與未來成長機會,其中正常盈餘代表當期的企業績效與未來績效的持續性影響;此外IT所帶來的成長機會也應包含在企業價值中。因此本研究採用資訊科技能力做為自變數,著重於IT對於企業的持續性與成長性的影響,並且認為使用企業價值來檢驗IT能力所帶來的價值會是更適宜的。 使用InformationWeek雜誌每年所公布的企業IT排行榜,從2001至2009年共427家入選企業作為IT領導者。檢驗發現比起其他企業在企業績效是正向影響但不顯著,對於企業價值則是正顯著影響,並且IT能力對於價值的影響是顯著於對績效的影響。此外進一步使用產業別進行分群,發現IT對於不同產業的影響並非一致的。但整體而言,資訊科技能力對於企業價值有正顯著影響則是肯定的,並且比起使用企業績效能夠更準確且全面地衡量資訊科技所帶來的影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The resource-based view (RBV) is widely used to solve the issue of IT investment and firm performance as “productivity paradox.” The researchers think that firms by investing to create superior IT capability, and then increase their firm performance.
However, the performance can only reflect the current and past outcome, but cannot reflect the future operating situation. Because the IT impact on business is continuous and can bring growth opportunities, only use performance to measure the impact will underestimate the value from IT. Furthermore, it may impact the willingness and decision of owners to invest in IT. Based on the evaluation theory, firm value includes normalized earnings and growth opportunities. The normalized earnings in which representatives of current firm performance and the sustainable effects of future performance; In addition, the growth opportunities brought by IT should be included in the firm value. In this study, IT capabilities as an independent variable, and focus on the sustainable and growth opportunity of IT for firms, and thinks that use firm value to examine the value from IT capability is more appropriate. Using the firm’s IT ranks that published by InformationWeek every year, there are 427 firms as the IT leaders from 2001 to 2009. The results are that the IT impact on performance is positive but not significant; the IT impact on value is positive and significant; the IT impact on value is more significant than on performance. In addition, we use the industry sectors to cluster, and find that the IT impact is not consistent in different industry. Overall, the positive significant impact of IT capability to firm value is confirmed, and then using the value is more accurate and comprehensive to measure the impact from IT. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T03:55:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97725011-1.pdf: 1638040 bytes, checksum: 349b2a95a0cc79e92fa19d181902f093 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 表 次 六
圖 次 七 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 資訊科技能力文獻回顧 4 第二節 內部優勢 8 第三節 外部優勢 12 第四節 企業價值衡量探討 15 第三章 研究架構 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 研究假設 20 第四章 研究方法 22 第一節 樣本選擇 22 第二節 變數選擇 24 第三節 檢定方式 25 第五章 結果 26 第一節 全部樣本 26 第二節 產業樣本 30 第三節 個案比較 37 第六章 討論 39 第一節 全部樣本 39 第二節 產業樣本 41 第三節 個案研究 43 第四節 學術貢獻 44 第五節 管理意涵 45 第六節 研究限制 45 第七節 未來研究 46 第八節 結論 47 參考文獻 49 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 資訊科技能力與企業價值之關係研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Information Technology Capability and Firm Value | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李書行(Li, Shu-Hsing),陳忠仁(Chung-Jen Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 資訊科技能力,企業價值,企業績效, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Information Technology Capability,Firm Value,Firm Performance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 55 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-06-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.6 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。