請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44292
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林國慶 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ni-Chen Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳妮蓁 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:49:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-13 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
內政部地政司,2009。『非都市土地使用管制規則』。http://www.land.moi.gov.tw/law/chhtml/lawmain1.asp。 王松永、張豐丞、李怡真、楊賜霖、林法勤,2005。「柳杉疏伐木有效利用之探討」,『國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告』。19卷4期,293-300。 王義仲,2002。「林木對碳吸存效益評估」,『華岡農科學報』。10期,53-67。 任憶安、林俊成,1997。「台灣私有造林獎勵方式效果的評估-林農反映調查報告」,『台灣林業科學』。12卷4期,393-402。 任憶安、陳永修、陳坤照,1987。「台灣林間放牧在經濟上之可行性分析」,『林業試驗所研究報告季刊』。2卷3期,211-215。 任憶安、塗三賢、吳萬益,1998。「台灣私有林農對現行修訂之造林獎勵反應的初步調查」,『台灣林業科學』。13卷2期,139-146。 行政院農業委員會,2002。「平地景觀造林及綠美化計畫」。台北:林務局編印。 行政院農業委員會,2007。『農業統計年報』,http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=17729。 行政院主計處,2005。『農林漁牧普查統計』,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=3279&CtUnit=389&BaseDSD=7。 行政院農業委員會林務局,2002。「推動平地景觀造林實施策略參考手冊」。台北:林務局編印。 行政院農業委員會林務局,2009。『林業法規』,http://www.forest.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=249&CtUnit=11&BaseDSD=7&xq_xCat=1&mp=1。 吳俊賢、林俊成、李國忠、陳溢宏、林麗貞、林瑞進,2005。「森林能源作物之二氧化碳吸存效果與能源產出效率」,『臺大實驗林研究報告』。19卷1期,43-53。 吳俊賢、劉瓊霦、陳溢宏、陳麗琴、林俊成、鄭美如、許秋雁,2006。「六龜試驗林森林生態系經營經濟效益評估之研究」,『台灣林業科學』。21卷2期,191-203。 李久先、顏添明,1995。「紅檜人工林單木生長之研究(二)-Chapman-Richards 生長模式在疏伐林分之應用」,『國立中興大學實驗林研究報告』。17卷1期,125-136。 李久先、顏添明,1998。「應用RICHARDS生長模式分析疏伐林分之單木生長」,『中華林學季刊』。31卷2期,165-176。 李久先、顏添明、許哲維,2007。「私有林主經營意願與造林獎勵方式關係之探討」,『林業研究季刊』。29卷1期,39-50。 李明晃,1998。「以混農林業經營方式配合全民造林運動」,『豐年』。48卷5期,40-44。 李俊志、羅紹麟,2008。「私有林主休閒林業經營行為意向模式之研究-以台中縣私有林主為例」,『林業研究季刊』,30卷4期,41-52。 李國忠、林俊成,2000。「森林資源碳吸存與碳排放權交易」,『臺灣林業』。26卷4期,19-24。 李國忠、林俊成、陳麗琴,2000。「臺灣杉人工林碳吸存潛力及成本效益」,『林業研究專訊』。15卷1期,115-123。 李皇照、陳郁方 ,2004。「國內旅遊市場消費者特性分析」,『生物與休閒事業研究』。1卷1期,51-64。 汪大雄,2007。「疏伐作業對人工林組成、生長、結構和林地微環境之影響」,『林業研究專訊』。14卷1期,8-9。 汪大雄、湯適謙、邱志明,2006。「六龜試驗林臺灣杉人工林疏伐四年後對生長和林分結構影響之分析」,『臺灣林業科學』,21卷3期,339-351。 周榮昌、陳志成、翁美娟,2004。「台灣地區家戶汽機車相互持有與使用間的關係」,『運輸計劃季刊』。33卷4期,625-648。 周榮昌、劉祐興、連思源,2006。「高速公路高乘載專用車道接受度之分析」,『運輸學刊』。18卷4期,331-364。 林俊成,1994。「私有林經營意願與補貼制度之研究—台北縣個案研究」。碩士論文,國立台灣大學森林學研究所。 林俊成、王培蓉、陳麗琴、林裕仁,2008。「環境態度類型對森林生態系服務重要性認知之研究」,『台灣林業科學』,23卷,51-62。 林俊成、鄭美如、劉淑芬、李國忠,2002。「全民造林運動二氧化碳吸存潛力之經濟效益評估」,『臺灣林業科學』。17卷3期,311-21。 林國慶,1992。「最適農地管制水準之決定-農地財產權管制理論」,『臺灣土地金融季刊』。29卷3期,55-62。 林國慶,2003。「平地造林政策分析」,『農業經濟叢刊』。8卷2期,111-140。 林國慶,2006。「台糖平地景觀效益之評估」,行政院農業委員會林務局委託研究計畫系列,95-00-5-13。 林國慶,2007。「最適造林獎勵制度之研究」,行政院農業委員會林務局委託研究計畫系列,96-00-5-09。 林國慶,2008。「提昇農民平地造林所得之探討計畫」,行政院農業委員會林務局委託研究計畫系列,97-00-5-16。 林國慶、王亞男,2004。「平地景觀造林政策評估」。行政院農業委員會林務局委託研究計畫系列,93-00-5-09。 林國慶、王亞男,2005。「京都議定書與平地景觀造林政策之研究」,行政院農業委員會林務局委託研究計畫系列,94-00-5-01。 林國慶、柳婉郁,2006。「考量碳吸存效益之杉木造林獎勵金分析」,『農業經濟半年刊』。79期,71-102。 林國慶、柳婉郁,2007。「平地景觀造林政策之執行成果與實證分析」,『經濟法制論叢』。第40 期,175-211。 林翰謙、黃金城、張義雄、黃俊傑、王瓊華,2003。「柳杉疏伐木多階段利用創作之評估」,『臺灣林業』。29卷6期 邱志明,2006。「疏伐撫育經營策略對森林碳吸存之影響」,『林業研究專訊』。13卷1期,6-9。 施孟隆、黃炳文、彭克仲,2002。「加入WTO台南縣畜牧業者經營意願之研究」,『農業經濟半年刊』。72卷,119-148。 柳婉郁,2004。「最適造林獎勵金之研究」。碩士論文,國立台灣大學農業經濟研究所。 徐瑋宏、郭平欣,2008。「子宮頸抹片篩檢『認知』與『利用』的影響因素分析─雙元普羅比模型之實證研究」,『台灣衛誌』。27卷3期,231-242。 許應哲,2001。「台灣酪農業者對前景預期的計量分析」,『農業經濟半年刊』。69卷,91-106。 陳成業、林怡秀,2008。「職業運動賽會消費者購票行為預測模式之建構-以美國NBA丹佛金塊隊為例」,『體育學報』。41卷2期,69-82。 陳明杰,2007。「疏伐作業對人工林林地水土保持影響」,『林業研究專訊』。14期1卷 ,10-13。 陳彥仲、許佑全,2004。「建立以單一函數推估租賃住宅之供給及需求選擇機率彈性-台北都會區與台南都市地區之比較分析」,『都市與計劃』。31卷4期,413-426。 陳振威,1951。「台灣經營混農林之商榷」,『台灣農林』。5卷9期,26-27。 陳麗琴、林俊成、張新儀、劉瓊霦,2005。「台灣地區森林遊憩經濟價值之效益移轉」,『台大實驗林研究報告』。19卷4期,271-279。 曾喜鵬、薛立敏,2004。「家戶在都會區內部之遷移與住宅選擇模式-以住宅消費失衡與調整為觀點的解釋」,『建築與規劃學報』。5卷1期,1-28。 馮正民、郭奕妏,2006。「路線資訊類型對高速公路小汽車駕駛人路線移轉行為之影響」,『運輸計劃季刊』。36卷4期,477-508。 黃裕星,1998。「台灣山地混農林業發展芻議」,『豐年』。48卷5期,22-29。 葉春淵、黃琮琪、羅炳和、李家銘,2007。「消費者國族中心主義對農產品購買行為之研究-新鮮蘋果為例」,『中華農學會報』。8卷6期,571-584。 鄭欽龍、施友元,2006。「南投地區承租造林地林木伐採成本之分析」,『中華林學季刊』。39卷3期,315-327。 鄭欽龍、陳重銘、陳瑩達,2006。「台灣人工林疏伐成本之計量分析」,『中華林學季刊』。39卷1期,57-66。 謝欣怡、袁孝維、丁宗蘇,2005。「疏伐作業對野生動物多樣性之影響」,『台灣林業』。31卷1期,17-20。 謝漢光,1950。「台灣山地造林應採混農林作業制」,『台灣農林』。4卷3期,23。 謝漢欽、汪大雄、林俊成,2003。「應用地理資訊系統估算六龜試驗林森林蓄積變動之二氧化碳吸存效應」,『台灣林業科學』。18卷3期,171-182。 顏添明,2006。「由疏伐示範區的成立談疏伐作業的重要性及未來遠景」,『臺灣林業』。32卷5期,17-23。 顏添明、李久先、許哲維,2008。「私有林主之參與經驗與造林獎勵政策關係之探討-以台中縣為例」,『林業研究季刊』。30卷3期,53-64。 羅卓振南、邱志明、陳燕章,2000。「藤枝地區臺灣杉人工林疏伐修枝效果之研究」,『臺灣林業科學』。15卷2期,237-244。 羅紹麟、林喻東, 1999。「臺灣地區混農林業經濟價值之評估」,國立中興大學實驗林研究彙刊。21卷1期,21-35。 羅紹麟、林喻東,1993。「台灣地區混農林業經營之研究」,國立中興大學實驗林研究報告。15卷2期,57-82。 羅紹麟、林喻東,2002。「混農林業永續發展的初探」,森林生態系永續經營研討會,42-63。 譚榮、曲福田,2005。「補貼對林業生產及森林生態效益影響的經濟學分析:一個定量分析模型」,『自然資源學報』。20卷4期,605-612。 二、英文部分 Antle, J. M., J. J. Stoorvogel, and R. O. Valdivia, 2007. “Assessing the economic impact of agricutural carbon sequastration: Terraces and agroforestry in the Peruvian Andes,” Agricutural, Ecosystem, and Environmental. 122:435-445. Beetz, A., 2002. “Agroforestry overview,” www.attra.ncat.org Behan, J., K. McQuinn, and M. J. Roche, 2006.“Rural land use: Traditional agriculture or forestry?” Land Economics. 82(1):112-123. Bogaerts, T., I. P. Williamson, and E. M. Fendel , 2002. “The role of land administration in the accession of Central European countries to the European Union,” Land Use Policy. 19(1):29-46. Bonfim, D., 2009. “Credit risk drivers: Evaluating the contribution of firm level information and of macroeconomic dynamics,” Journal of Banking and Finance. 33(2):281-299. Bonyad, A., 2006. “Silvicultural thinning intensity effects on increasing the growth of planted Loblolly Pine (Pinus Taeda L.) stands in Northern Iran,” Taiwan Journal of Forest Science. 21(3):317-326. Brey, R., P. Riera, and J. Mogas, 2007. “Estimation of forest values using choice modelling: An application to Spanish forests,” Ecological Economics. 64(2):305-312. Bromley, D. W., 2008. “Formalising property relations in the developing world: The wrong prescription for the wrong malady,” Land Use Policy. 26(1):20-27. Brown, G. and P. Reed, 2000. “Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning,” Forest Science. 46(2):240-247. Campos, P. and A. Caparros, 2006. “Social and private total Hicksian incomes of multiple use forests in Spain,” Ecological Economics. 57:545-557. Campos, P., P. Ovando, and Montero G., 2008. “Does private income support sustainable agroforestry in Spanish dehesa?” Land Use Policy. 25(4):510-522. De Oliveira, J. A. P., 2008. “Property rights, land conflicts and deforestation in the Eastern Amazon,” Forest Policy and Economics. 10(5):303-315. Dixon, R. K, J. K. Winjum, and P. E Schroeder, 1993. “Conservation and sequestration of carbon,” Global Environment Change. 3(2):159-173. Drydakis, N., 2009. “Sexual orientation discrimination in the labour market,” Labour Economics. 16(4):364-372. Dudek, D. J. and A. LeBlanc, 1990. “Offsetting new CO2 emission: a rational first greenhouse policy step,” Contemporary Policy Issues. 8:29-42 Franco, D., D. Franco, I. Mannino, and G. Zanetto, 2001. “The role of agroforestry networks in landscape socioeconomic processes: The potential and limits of the contingent valuation method,” Landscape and Urban Planning. 55(4): 239-256. Gaston, N. and T. Kishi, 2007. “Part-time workers doing full-time work in Japan,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 21(4):435-454. Gimet C., 2007. “Conditions necessary for the sustainability of an emerging area: The importance of banking and financial regional criteria,” Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 17(4):317-335. Gong, P. and B. Kristron , 1999. “Regulating forest rotation to increase CO2 sequestration,” SLU(Sveriges Landbruksuniversitet), Institutionen for skogsekonomi, Arbetsraort 272. Gould, K. A., D. R. Carter, and R. K. Shrestha, 2006. “Extra-legal land market dynamics on a Guatemalan agricultural frontier: Implications for neoliberal land policies,” Land Use Policy. 23(4):408-420. Greene, W. H. (2007). Econometric analysis. (5th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Hartman, R., 1976. “The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value,” Economic Inquiry. 14: 52-58. Houghton, R. A., 1996. “Converting terrestrial ecosystems from sources to sinks of carbon,” Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Mitigation Strategies in Asia and the Pacific, Ambio. 25(4):267-272. Huang, C.H. and G.D. Kronrad, 2001.“The cost of sequestering carbon on private forest lands,” Forest Policy and Economics. 2:133-142. Jongeneel, R. A., N. B. P. Polman, and L. H.G. Slangen, 2008. “Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional?” Land Use Policy. 25(1):81-94. King, F.S., 1987. “The history of agroforestry system, agroforestry systems in the tropics,” International Council for Research in Agroforestry ICRAF House, off Limuru Road, Gigiri P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya. 1-12 Kumar, S. and S. Kant, 2007. “Exploded logit modeling of stakeholders’ preference for multiple forest values,” Forest Policy and Economics. 9: 516-526. Ladenburg, J., 2008. “Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark: Choice of development strategy,” Renewable Energy. 33(1):111-118. Lehtonen, E., J. Kuuluvainen, E. Pouta, M. Rekola, C. Li, 2003. “Non-market benefits of conservation in southern Finland,” Environmental Science and Policy. 6:195-204. Lubowski, R. N., A. J. Plantinga, and R. N. Stavins, 2006. “Land-use change and carbon sinks: Econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 51(1):135-152. Maclaren, J. P. 1996. “Plantation forestry—it ’s role as a carbon sink: conclusions from calculations based on New Zealand’s planted forest estate. In: Apps M, Price D, editors. Effects of forest management, harvesting and wood processing on ecosystem carbon dynamics: A boreal case study.” Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle. New York: Springer-Verlag. 257-270. Markussen, T., 2008. “Property rights, productivity, and common property resources: Insights from rural Cambodia,” World Development. 36(11):2277-2296. Merlo, M., E. Milocco, R. Panting, and P. Virgilietti, 2000. “Transformation of environmental recreational goods and services provided by forestry into recreational environmental products,” Forestry Policy and Economics. 1:127-138. Moons, E. and S. Rousseau, 2007. “Policy options for afforestation in Flanders,” Ecological Economics. 64(1): 194-203. Morris, S., 2007. “The impact of obesity on employment,” Labour Economics. 14(3):413-433. Moulton, R. and K. Richards, 1990. “Cost of sequestration carbon through tree planting and forest management in the U.S.,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., Gen Tech. Rep. W.O.58. Moura-Costa, P., Y. S. Wai, O. C. Lye, A Ganing, R. Nussbaum, and T. Mojiun, 1994. “Large scale enrichment planting with dipterocarps as an alternative for carbon offset - methods and preliminary results,” Innoprise-Face Foundation Rainforest Rehabilitation Project (Infapro) Innoprise Corporation Sdn. Bhd., Danum Valley Field Centre PS 282, 91108 Lahad Datu, Sabah, Malaysia. Muzhingi, T., A. S. Langyintuo, L. C. Malaba, and M. Banziger, 2008. “Consumer acceptability of yellow maize products in Zimbabwe,” Food Policy. 33(4):352-361. Nair, P. K. R., 1985. “Classification of agroforestry systems,” Agroforestry Systems. 3:97-128 Nishitani, K., 2009. “ An empirical study of the initial adoption of ISO 14001 in Japanese manufacturing firms,” Ecological Economics. 68(3):669-679. Perez, C., C. Roncoli, C. Neely, and J. L. Steiner, 2007. “Can carbon sequestration markets benefit low-income producers in semi-arid Africa? Potentials and challenges,” Agricultural Systems. 94( 1): 2-12. Povellato, A., F. Bosello, and C. Giupponi, 2007. “Cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gases mitigation measures in the European agro-forestry sector: A literature survey,” Environmental Science and Policy. 10(5): 474-490. Ramlal, E., D. Yemshanov, G. Fox,and D. McKenny, 2009. “A bioeconomic model of afforestation in Southern Ontario: Integration of fiber, carbon and municipal biosolids values,” Journal of Environmental Management. 90:1833-1843. Rolston, H., and J. Courfal, 1991. “A forest ehtic and multivalue forest management,” Forest Science. 89:35-40. Sakata, K., 2005, “Carbon dioxide price from which an afforestation interest rate becomes maximum in each cutting age: Loblolly pine in southeast Georgia, USA,” Journal of Forest Research. 10(5):385–390. Samuelson, P. A., 1976. “Economics of forestry in an evolving society,” Economic Inquiry. 14(4):466-492. Sauer, J. and J. M. Abdallah, 2007. “Forest diversity, tobacco production and resource management in Tanzania,” Forest Policy and Economics. 9(5):421-439. Sedjo, R. A. and A. M. Solomon, 1989. “Climate and forests,” in Rosenberg, N. J., Easterling, W. E.Ⅲ, Crosson, P. R., and Darmstadter, J. (eds.), Greenhouse Warming: Abatement and Adaptation, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 105-119. Sedjo, R.A., 1989. “Forests to offset the greenhouse effect,” Journal of Forestry. 87(7):12-16. Sjaastad, E. and B. Cousins, 2008. “Formalisation of land rights in the South: An overview,” Land Use Policy. 26:(1)1-9. Slangen, L.H.G., G.C. Van Kooten, and .P.P.F. Van Rie, 1997. “Economics of timber plantations on CO2 emissions in the Netherlands,” Tijdschrift voor Sociaal Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek van de Landbouw. 12:318–333. Tassone, V. C., J. Wesseler, and F. S. Nesci, 2004. “Diverging incentives for afforestation from carbon sequestration: An economic analysis of the EU afforestation program in the south of Italy,” Forest Policy and Economics. 6:567-578. Turner, R. K. and I. Bateman, 1992. “Pricing the european environment: United Kingdom,” Pricing the European Environment. 150-176. Van Kooten, G. C., L. M. Arthur, and W. R. Wilson, 1992. “Potential to sequester carbon in Canadian forests: Economic considerations,” Canada Public Policy. 18(8):127-38. Van Noordwijk, M., D. A. Suyamto, B. Lusiana, A. Ekadinata, and K. Hairiah, 2008. “Facilitating agroforestation of landscapes for sustainable benefits: Tradeoffs between carbon stocks and local development benefits in Indonesia according to the FALLOW model,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 126(2): 98-112. Wang, K. M, G. J. Y. Hsu and T. W. Kuo, 1999. “Simulating the Effect of CO2 Emission Reduction in Taiwan,” Proceedings of the 20th Annual North American Conference, pp.354-364, Orlando: International Association for Energy Economics. Wiebe, K. D. and R. Meinzen-Dick, 1998. “Property rights as policy tools for sustainable development,” Land Use Policy. 15(3):203-215. Winjum, J. K., S. Brown, and B. Schlamadinger, 1998. “Forest harvests and wood products: Sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide,” Forest Science. 44(2):272-84. Wise R., O. Cacho, and R. Hean, 2007. “Fertilizer effects on the sustainability and profitability of agroforestry in the presence of carbon payments,” Environmental Modelling and Software. 22:1372-1381. Zelek, C. and G. Shively, 2003. “Measuring the opportunity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical agriculture,” Land Economics. 79(3):282-298. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44292 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 平地景觀造林政策自2002年1月1日起開始執行,計畫執行6年,預計完成25,100公頃之新植造林。自2002年至2007年底為止共完成造林8,919.18公頃,執行率為35.53%。造成私有農地造林不易推動之主要原因是為農民一旦參與造林,則該土地之財產權在造林之20年期間將會受到平地造林規範之限制,導致許多原先在農牧用地規範下的權利及可以提昇所得的機會將受到影響與限制,進而影響到農民參與平地造林的意願。因此,本研究的目的為探討提昇農民平地造林所得的可能方案,並以實證分析造林戶對於各項方案是否可以提昇所得的認知,以及這些認知對於該方案的支持度之影響。本研究首先對目前的平地造林規範進行財產權分析,並且針對造林戶之林地及地上物,研擬九種可能提昇農民所得之經營管理方案。本研究進一步引用林國慶(2008)對造林戶、專家學者、地方政府機關、及中央政府機關等四類與平地造林相關之受訪者進行問卷調查,以瞭解這四類受訪者對於現行平地造林規範的認知及看法。接著,本研究以實證分析造林戶對於九種經營管理方案是否能提昇所得認知對於支持度的影響。根據實證結果,本研究以受訪者對於九項方案之支持度高且歧異度低為推薦原則,高度推薦的二項方案為「建立碳排放企業認養機制」、「允許利用或出售森林副產物」;推薦的二項方案為「允許林農疏伐並出售疏伐木」及「在林地上發展休閒農業或生態休閒農業」。有所保留意見的方案為「允許林農將超過法定樹木之林木移栽出售」及「在林木下種植耐蔭植物」等二項,不予推薦的方案為「允許在林地上養雞鴨」、「允許在造林期間將景觀植物整株移栽出售」及「允許在林地上興建小木屋或農舍」等三項。本研究之實證分析主要目的為討論造林戶對於提昇農民平地造林是否能提昇所得之認知對於該方案支持度之影響。實證結果顯示,造林戶對於提昇農民平地造林所得之九種經營管理方案能提昇所得認知對支持度具正向顯著影響。本研究建議,對於參與平地造林之林地及地上林木之財產權規範,應加以明確界定,以利資源之有效利用,並且提昇農民所得,更能進一步保障森林之正外部性。針對本研究高度推薦及推薦的經營管理方案,政府應積極建立明確之規範,使造林戶可以使用其資源並增加可以提昇所得之機會。針對本研究不予推薦的經營管理方案,政府應建立明確之規範,以利於訂定明確之檢測標準,以使森林能有效發揮其正的外部性。針對本研究採保留意見之經營管理方案,政府則應評估其鬆綁後之效率與公平性,以及鬆綁後之執行成本,並進一步建立明確之規範,使造林戶能有效使用其資源,並增加其提昇所得之機會,以及確保平地造林之政策目標。對於財產權之明確規範與鬆綁應以不違反平地造林政策之目標,且不損害平地造林所提供之外部效益為原則。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Afforestation in the plain area program has been implemented for 6 years since 2002. From 2002 to 2007, the total area of new afforestation is 8,919.18 ha, that is only 35.53% of the original goal of 25,100 ha. The main difficulty of promoting private afforestation is the constrained land property rights imposed by the regulations for the period of 20 years after farmers enrolled in the afforestation program, which might reduce farmers’ opportunities to increase income. The purpose of this study is to recommend possible ways of forest and forest land managements in order to enhance the income opportunities for farmers participating in the afforestation program. This study also analyzes the cognitions of farmers in different management measures in enhancing income which might affect their supports of recommended management measures. A survey data by Lin (2008) was employed in this study. Farmers participating in the afforestation program in Hualien County, Pingtung County, and Tainan County, the related experts and scholars, county and city government officials, Forestry Bureau and the Forest Management Office officials were interviewed in this survey. The criteria used in the recommendation of those management measures considered are two folds. One is the high degree of supports and the other is the low degree of differences in the degree of supports among four groups of people surveyed. Based on these two criteria, two management measures are highly recommended, which include “establishing enterprise adoption mechanism of carbon emission” and “allowing farmers to use or sell special forest products”. Two management measures are recommended, which include “allowing farmers to thin and sell thinned logs” and “allowing farmers to develop leisure agriculture or biological leisure agriculture”. Two management measures are recommended with reservations, which include “allowing farmers to remove those trees which are more than legally required” and “allowing farmers to plant the shade-tolerant kinds of plaints”. And lastly three management measures are not recommended, which include “allowing farmers to raise chickens and ducks on the forest land”, “allowing farmers to remove and sell landscape plants in the period of afforestation”, and “allowing farmers to construct log cabin or farmhouse on the forest land”. The empirical resuls show that the cognitions of recommended management measures in enhancing farmers’ income have positive effects on the attitude of farmers in supporting the recommended management measures. The regulations of afforestation program on both the forest land and the objects on the land should be well-defined for the efficient use of resources. The government should set the priority to introduce highly recommended and recommended management measures and whereby modify the regulations which are deemed necessary in order to increase the opportunities of enhancing income by farmers. The regulation modification should be based on the principle of sustaining the positive externality provided by the forest land and complied with the original objectives of the policy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:49:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96627004-1.pdf: 1557847 bytes, checksum: bf4261a0c999f98630beddbbf786d79f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
謝 辭 II 摘 要 III ABSTRACT V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究步驟與流程 3 第四節 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 森林價值與外部效益 6 第二節 提昇農民造林所得之方法 10 第三節 私有財產權與永續發展 28 第三章 平地造林財產權分析 30 第一節 平地造林之規範 30 第二節 參加平地造林前後財產權之比較分析 33 第三節 平地造林之財產權理論分析 37 第四章 提昇農民所得之經營管理方案 42 第一節 現行平地造林政策之執行問題分析 42 第二節 提昇農民所得之九種經營管理方案 47 第五章 提昇農民平地造林所得之問卷調查 54 第一節 問卷調查對象 55 第二節 問卷設計 57 第三節 樣本資料結構分析 58 第六章 提昇農民平地造林所得之實證分析 62 第一節 提昇農民平地造林所得之敘述統計分析 62 第二節 提昇農民平地造林所得之實證模型設定 76 第三節 提昇農民平地造林所得之模型變數定義與說明 87 第四節 提昇農民平地造林所得之實證結果分析 95 第七章 結論與政策建議 109 第一節 平地造林財產權分析 110 第二節 提昇農民所得之經營管理方案 111 第三節 提昇農民所得之問卷調查 113 第四節 提昇農民所得之實證分析與推薦可提昇農民所得之經營管理方案 114 第五節 本研究推薦之經營管理方案分析 116 第六節 政策建議 116 參考文獻 119 附錄一 農牧用地容許使用項目及許可使用細目表 129 附錄二【提昇農民平地造林所得之探討計畫】問卷調查表-農民部分 134 附錄三【提昇農民平地造林所得之探討計畫】問卷調查表-專家學者與行政官員 部分 144 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 提昇農民平地造林所得之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on Enhancing Income for Farmers Participating in the Afforestation in the Plain Area Program | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王亞男,柳婉郁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 平地造林,農民所得,農業環境,Probit 模型,Ordered Probit模型,二階段工具變數法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Afforestation in the Plain Area Program,Farm Income,Agricultural Environment,Probit Model,Ordered Probit Model,Two-Stage Instrumental Variable Estimation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 149 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.52 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。