請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40473
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳明德 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tien-I Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡天怡 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T16:48:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-08-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Anwar, M. (2004). From doctoral dissertation to publication: a study of 1995 American graduates in Library and Information Sciences. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 36(4), 151-157.
Available. (2006). In Dictionary of Information and Library Management. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/6521941 Brace, W. (1976). Frequently cited authors and periodicals in library and information science dissertations, 1961-1970. Journal of Library & Information Science, 2(1), 16-34. Bremholm, T. (2004). Challenges and Opportunities for Bibliometrics in the Electronic Environment: The Case of the Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science. Science & Technology Libraries, 25(1/2), 87-107. Buckland, M. K. (1975). Book availability and the library user (p.93). New York : Pergamon Press. Buttlar, L. (1999). Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 227-245. Buzzard, M. L. & New, D. E. (1983). An investigation of collection support for doctoral research. College and Research Libraries, 44(6), 469-475. Casserly, M. F. & Bird, J. E. (2003). Web citation availability: analysis and implications for scholarship. College and Research Libraries 64 (4), 300-317. Citation (disambiguation). (2007). In Wikipedia. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_%28disambiguation%29 Citation. (2006). In Dictionary of Information and Library Management. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/6522466 Citation. (2008). In Wikipedia. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation Clapp, Verner W., et al. (1951). The balance of conflicting interests in building of collections: comprehensiveness versus selectivity. In Changing Patterns of scholarship and the future of research libraries: a symposium in celebration of the 200th anniversary of the establishment of the University of Pennsylvania Library (pp. 65-89). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Clarke, M. & Oppenheim, C. (2006). Citation behaviour of information science students II: Postgraduate students. Education for Information, 24(1), 1-30. Covey, D. T. (2003). The need to improve remote access to online library resources: filling the gap between commercial vendor and academic user practice. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(4), 577–599. Davis, P. M. & Cohen, S. A. (2001). The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (4), 309-14. Davis, P. M. (2002). The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: A 2000 update. College & Research Libraries, 63 (1), 53-60. Davis, P. M. (2003). The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: guiding student scholarship in a networked age. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 3(1), 41-51. Dilevko, J. & Gottlieb, L. (2002). Print sources in an electronic age : A vital part of the research process for undergraduate students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(6), 381-392. Dillon, I. & Hahn, K. (2002). Are Researchers Ready for the Electronic-Only Journal Collection? Results of a Survey at the University of Maryland. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 2(3), 375-390. Dunlap, C. R. (1976). Reaching the graduate students: Techniques and administration. In Radar, H. B. (Ed.). Faculty Involvement in Library Instruction. Ann Arbor: Pierian Press, as cited in 吳明德(民76)。我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之探討(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 76-0301-H002-13)。台北市:臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。 Egan, N. (2005). The Impact of Electronic Full-Text Resources on Interlibrary Loan: A Ten – Year Study at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserves, 15(3), 23-41. Harter, S. P. (1998). Scholarly communication and electronic journals: an impact study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(6), 507-516. Herman, I. (1991). Receptivity to foreign literature: a comparison of UK and US citing behavior in librarianship and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 13(1), 37-47. Herring, S. D. (2002). Use of scholarly resources in scholarly electronic journals: A citation analysis. College & Research Libraries, 63(4), 334-340. Jenkins, C. & Morley, M. (1999). Introduction. In Jenkins, C. & Morley, M. (Eds). Collection Management in Academic Libraries, 2nd ed., Gower, Aldershot, 1-14. Jenkins, P. O. (2002). They’re not just using web sites: A citation study of 116 student papers. College & Research Libraries News, 63(3), 164. Johnson, R. K., & Luther, J. (2007). The e-only tipping point for journals: what’s ahead in the print-to-electronic transition zone. NW: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved July 17, 2008, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/Electronic_Transition.pdf Joswick, K. E. & Stierman, J. K. (1997, Jan.). The core list mirage: A comparison of the journals frequently consulted by faculty and students. College & Research Libraries, 58, 48-55. Joswick, K. E. (1994). Library materials use by college freshmen: A citation analysis of composition papers. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 1(1), 43-65. King, D. W., & Montgomery, C. H. (2002). After migration to an electronic journal collection: impact on faculty and doctoral students. D-Lib Magazine 8(12), Retrieved July 17, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december02/king/12king.html Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning : a process approach to library and information services (2 ed.). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Kushkowski, J. D. (2005). Web citation by graduate students: a comparison of print and electronic theses. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5 (2), 259-276. Kushkowski, J., Parsons, K., & Wiese, W. (2003). Master's and Doctoral Thesis Citations: Analysis and Trends of a Longitudinal Study. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 3(3), 459-479. LaBorie, T. & Halperin, M. (1976). Citation patterns in library science dissertations. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 16, 271-283. Lee, H. (2003). Information spaces and collections: Implications for organization. Library & Information Science Research, 25(4), 419-436. Leiding, R. (2005). Using citation checking of undergraduate honors thesis bibliographies to evaluate library collections. College & Research Libraries, 66, 417-429. Liu, Z. & Yang, Z. (2004). Factors influencing distance-education graduate students' use of information sources: A user study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 24-35. MacWhinnie, L. A. (2003). The information commons: the academic library of the future. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 241–257. Malone, D. & Videon, C. (1997). Assessing undergraduates use of electronic resources: A quantitative analysis of works cited. Research Strategies, 15(3), 151-158. Miyairi, N. (2008, May). How researcher cite documents on the Web?。在國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所編,網路計量與探勘學術研討會論文集(頁21-35),台北市。 Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Volume 41, 609-641. Nisonger, T. E. (2003). Evaluation of library collections, access, and electronic resources : a literature guide and annotated bibliography. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Okrent, N. (2001). Use of full-text electronic resources by philosophy students at UNC-Chapel Hill: A citation analysis. Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina. Retrieved May 20, 2007, from http://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/2685.pdf Oppenheim, C. & Smith, R. (2001). Student citation practices in an Information Science Department. Education for Information, 19(4), 299-323. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. Peat, W. L. (1981). The use of research libraries: A comment about the Pittsburgh study and its critics. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 7, 299-231. Reitz, J. M. (2004a). Citation. In Dictionary for Library and Information Science (p.142). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Reitz, J. M. (2004b). Cite. In Dictionary for Library and Information Science (p.143). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Reitz, J. M. (2004c). Electronic style. In Dictionary for Library and Information Science (p.244). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Roberts, E. P. (1992). ILL/Document delivery as an alternative to local ownership of seldom-used scientific journals. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 18(1), 30-34. Robinson, A. M. & Schlegl, K. (2004). Student bibliographies improve when professors provides enforceable guidelines for citations. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 4(2), 275-290. Serotkin, P., Fitzgerald, P., & Balough, S. (2005). If we build it, will they come? Electronic journals acceptance and usage patterns. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 5(4), 497-512. Smith, A. G., (2004). Web links as analogues of citations. Information Research, 9(4). Retrieved May 12, 2007, from http://informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper188.html Smith, E. T. (2003). Assessing collection usefulness: an investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate student use. College & Research Libraries, 64, 344-55. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends 30, 83-106. Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved May 12, 2007, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 81–135. Thomas, J. (1993). Graduate student use of journals: a bibliometric study of psychology theses. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 12(1), 1-7. Truesdell, C. (1994). Is access a viable alternative to ownership? A review of access performance. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20(4), 200-206. van Scoyoc, A. & Cason, C. (2006). The Electronic Academic Library: undergraduate Research Behavior in Library Without Books. portal: Libraries & the Academy, 6(1), 47-58. Vaughan, L. & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and web citations: what is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (14), 1313-1322. Vaughan, L. & Shaw, D. (2005). Web citation data for impact assessment: a comparison of four science disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (10), 1075-1087. Walcott, R. (1994). Local citation studies: a shortcut to local knowledge. Science &Technology Libraries, 14, 1-14. Waldhart, T. J. (1985). Performance evaluation of interlibrary loan in the United States: A review of research. Library & Information Science Research, 7, 313-331. Warner, E. S. (1981). Impact of interlibrary access to periodicals on subscription continuation/cancellation decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(2), 93-95. Washington-Hoagland, C., & Clougherty, L. (2002). Identifying the resource and service needs of graduate and professional students: the University of Iowa user needs of graduate professional series. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 2(1), 125-143. Zhang, Y. (2001). Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(8), 628-654. Zipp, L. S. (1996). Thesis and dissertation citations as indicators of faculty research use of university library journal collections. Library Resources and Technical Services 40, 335-342. 久保田昭子(1976)。慶應義塾大学文学部図書館.情報科学生の文献利用調査。Library and Information Science,14,193-209。 內政部(2006)。戶政-人口年齡分配。內政統計年報。上網日期:2007年5月26日。網址:http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/ 巴頓(Patton, M. Q.)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(Qualitative evaluation and research methods)(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。台北縣:桂冠。(原作1990出版) 台灣大學(2008)。台灣大學2007統計年報.行政支援篇。上網日期:2008年4月16日。網址:http://acct2007.cc.ntu.edu.tw/#l6 吳明德(2006,1月)。館藏發展的再省思-從一些數據談起。在國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所編,數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集。台中市:編者。 吳明德(民76)。我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之探討(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 76-0301-H002-13)。台北市:臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。 施孟雅(1992)。從專業期刊文獻分析我國臺灣地區的圖書館學硏究。台北市:漢美。 張郁齡(1991)。我國大學圖書館法律館藏支援敎授及博碩士班硏究生學術硏究之探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 陳旭耀(1996)。臺灣地區圖書資訊學碩士論文及其引用文獻之研究。未出版之碩士論文,輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北縣。 陳秀慧與邱炯友(民90)。『網路引用文獻』分析:圖資學與其他學域之比較。國家圖書館館刊,90,47-86。 資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」(2006)。1996年起,台灣歷年上網人口統計。Focus on Internet and Data。上網日期:2006年5月3日。網址:http://www.find.org.tw/0105/howmany/usage_1.asp 資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」(2006年12月)。經常上網人口成長情形。上網日期:2007年5月26日。網址:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=165 蔣穎、楊沛超(2006)。人文社會科學研究人員資訊搜集的行為規則分析。中國圖書館學報,2006(1), 81-84。 鄭麗敏(1994a)。近20年臺灣地區圖書館學期刊論文引用參考文獻特性分析(上)。教育資料與圖書館學,32(1),94-118。 鄭麗敏(1994b)。近20年臺灣地區圖書館學期刊論文引用參考文獻特性分析(下)。教育資料與圖書館學,32(1),210-238。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40473 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 網際網路的發展對資訊使用帶來深遠的影響,資訊可獲性隨著網路興起而提升,使用者可以透過更多元的管道、更即時地取得所需的資源。許多研究提及資訊可獲性對大學師生之重要;且隨著電子資源的增加,學術引用中亦出現網路引用,也有學者開始探究網路興起前後引用型態之改變,並指出應透過量化與質化的研究方法,進一步了解引用型態之改變情形。本研究旨在探討資訊可獲性對研究生引用文獻之意義,了解網路興起前後圖書資訊學領域研究生引用文獻特性之變化情形,並掌握研究生網路引用之特性及其網路引用之考量。
本研究藉由引文分析及館藏查核法,同時搭配深度訪談法,探討資訊可獲性及網際網路對研究生引用文獻之影響,由於1997年為網路興起之年代,本研究針對其前後十年(民國七十六至九十五學年度)臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所246篇博碩士論文進行分層系統抽樣,抽出81篇樣本論文,同時納入近兩學年度館藏查核之22篇論文,共計103篇論文,對此11,425筆引用文獻進行引文分析;另一方面,針對九十四及九十五學年度之33篇論文進行館藏查核,從中徵求17位自願受訪者進行深度訪談。 研究結果顯示:(一)研究生引用文獻之來源管道以網際網路、個人收藏、有地緣關係的圖書館及人際管道為優先。其中,個人收藏以課程或業務資料為主;人際管道以指導教授及同學為主。(二)資訊可獲性與研究生的引用文獻相關,且研究生傾向引用資訊可獲性較高之文獻。研究生偏好透過其所認定較方便之管道取得所需的研究資料,並且可能依時間、相關度、階段性等因素決定是否設法取得該文獻。研究生若不確定資源的重要性、不確定可以何種管道取得或認為資源具有可替代性,則可能捨棄該資源。(三)研究生引文特性以近十年之中英文期刊與圖書為主,其中又以英文期刊為主,且近五年之文獻亦較多。(四)網路興起後,研究生引用文獻數量減少、資料類型漸趨多元、引用文獻新穎性提升。其中,引文數量減少及新穎性提升可能與論文主題有關;資料類型多元化及引用文獻新穎性提升可能與網路興起有關。(五)研究生傾向以紙本方式引用來自網際網路的資源,造成低估網路引用之比例。(六)研究生考量網路引用以權威性與學術性為主,通常以機構與出處、作者的任職單位與身份及來源網域判斷網路資源的權威性;以來源網站之屬性、內容完整性、內容及其發表型態判斷其學術性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The rapid development of the Internet and the growth of electronic resources have exerted great impacts on the ways one obtains and uses information. The prevalence of the Internet has made information more widely available, and users can now have timely access to resources they need in a variety of ways. Researchers have emphasized the importance of information availability. As electronic resources continue to grow at a rapid rate, there have been more web citations in academic works, which leads to changing patterns in citations. Some researchers have investigated how citation patterns have changed from pre- to post-Internet age, and have pointed out that we may acquire a better understanding of citation patterns through different research methods. In light of these concerns, this study has three purposes: 1) to examine the meaning of information availability to graduate students when they cite sources in their works; 2) to compare the citation patterns in LIS theses and dissertations in the pre- and post-Internet age; 3) to analyze the patterns of web citation in theses and dissertations as well as the concerns of graduate students when citing electronic resources.
This study includes citation analysis, citation checking and in-depth interviews to explore the influence of information availability on citations in theses and dissertations. The data comes from 246 theses and dissertations in the Department of LIS at National Taiwan University from 1987-88 to 2006-07 academic years. A stratified systematic sampling is employed by selecting 81 sample theses and dissertations from pre-Internet age (1987-88 to 1996-97) and post-Internet age (1997-98 to 2006-07). Meanwhile, 22 theses and dissertations, of which citations were checked, were also included to perform a citation analysis of 11,425 citations from a total of 103 theses and dissertations. In addition, citations of 33 theses and dissertations from the 2005-06 to 2006-07 academic years were checked with the NTU collection. Interviews were conducted with 17 volunteers who graduated within the most recent two academic years. Results of this study indicate that: 1) the Internet, personal collection, nearby libraries, and other informal channels are the preferred sources of information for graduate students when citing information in their thesis or dissertations; 2) graduate students tend to cite the most accessible information; 3) citations of theses and dissertations are mainly from journals and books in Chinese and English published within ten years; 4) in the post-Internet age, the number of citation has declined, the document type has become more diverse, and the currency has enhanced; 5) graduate students tend to cite electronic resources in print format, and thus the research may underestimate the total web citations; 6) graduate students are mainly concerned with the authority and academic credibility when citing information from the Internet. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T16:48:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R94126005-1.pdf: 1020651 bytes, checksum: b80994c21cb113194beb30d03c49dd87 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題陳述 1 第二節 研究範圍與限制 5 第三節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻分析 9 第一節 大學圖書館與資訊可獲性 9 第二節 圖書資訊學領域引用文獻之特性 21 第三節 網際網路對引用文獻之影響 31 第三章 研究設計與實施 39 第一節 研究方法 39 第二節 研究對象及研究工具 40 第三節 研究步驟與流程 43 第四章 引文分析及館藏查核研究結果 51 第一節 圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻之特性 51 第二節 圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻之可獲性分析 69 第五章 深度訪談研究結果 77 第一節 受訪者基本資料分析 77 第二節 研究生取用研究相關資料之偏好 79 第三節 資訊可獲性對研究生取用研究資料之影響 125 第四節 網際網路對研究生引用文獻之影響 159 第五節 綜合討論 178 第六章 結論與建議 195 第一節 結論 195 第二節 建議 201 第三節 進一步研究之建議 203 參考書目 205 附錄一 213 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 資訊可獲性對圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻影響之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Influence of Information Availability on Citations of Theses and Dissertations in Library and Information Science | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王梅玲,黃慕萱,唐牧群 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 引文分析,引用行為,本館可獲性,博碩士論文,資訊可獲性,圖書資訊學,網路引用, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | citation analysis,citing behavior,information availability,library and information science,local availability,theses and dissertations,web citation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 215 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 996.73 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。