請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39107
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo-Ja Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉又嘉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:02:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-02-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-02-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-01-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Albert, S. & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational Identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 8, 263-295. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J.E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 13-17. Alvesson, M. (1990). Organization: From substance to image? Organization Studies, 11, 373-394. Arora, R. G. & Cavusgil, S. T. (1985). “Image and cost factors in the choice of mental health-care organization.” Academy of Marketing Science. 13, 119-129. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20-39. Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. In J. A. C. Baum & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 17-62. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 226-224. Berg, P. O. (1985). Organization change as a symbolic transformation process. In P. Frost, L. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds). Reframing organizational culture, 281-300. Berverly Hills, CA: Sage. Berney, J. (1998). A strategy conversation on the topic of organizational identity. In D. A. Whetten and P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in Organizations, 103-109. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Boorstin, D. J. (1961). The Image. New York: Harper & Row. Brown, J. D., Collins, R. L., & Schmidt, G. W. (1988). Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 445-453. Brown, M. E. (1969). Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 346-355. Brown, T. J., & Cox, E. L. (1997). Corporate associations in marketing and consumer research: A review. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1), 34-39. Burke, P. J. (1997). An identity model for network exchange. American Sociological Review, 62, 134-150. Cheney, G. (1983). “On the various and changing meanings of organized membership: A field study of organizational identification.” Communication Monographs, 50, 342-375. Child, T. & Smith, C. (1987). The context and process of organizational transformation, Journal of Management Studies, 24, 565-593. Crowne, C. P., & Marlowe, D. A. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354. Dutton, J. E. & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263. Elsbach, K. D. & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members’ response to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442-476. Elsbach, K. D. & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal. 35, 699-738. Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421-444. Fiol, C. M. (2001). Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27, 691-699. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing values from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233-258. Foote, N. (1953). “Identification as a basis for a theory of motivation.” American Sociological Review, 16, 14-21. Foreman, P. & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ Identification with Multiple-Identity Organizations. Organization Science, 13, 618-635. Gagliardi, P. (1986). The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organization Studies. 7, 117-134. Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal. 36, 414-427. Gecas, V. (1982). The Self-Concept. In Turner, R. H., & Short, J. F. Jr. (eds.) Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1-33. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Ginzel, L. E., Kramer, R. M., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 227-266. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 63-81. Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Image, identity and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370-403. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor. Greenberg, J. (1990). “Looking fair versus being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice.” In Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 111-157. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Grunig, J. E. (1993). Image and substance: From symbolic to behavioral relationships. Public Relations Review, 19, 121-139. Grusky, O. (1966). Career mobility and organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 488-503. Haggard, E. A. (1958). Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. NY: Dryden. Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 356-365. Higgins, E. T. (1987). “Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.” Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. Hinings, C. R. & Greenwood, R. (1988). The dynamics of strategic change. New York: Basil, Blakwell. Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge. Hogg, M. A. & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization process in organization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121-140. Hsu, W. L. & Cheng, B. S. (2002). Organizational identification: A preliminary theoretical and fundamental analysis. Chung Shan Management Review, 10, 45-64. (In Chinese). Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 50-71. Markus, H. R., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social-psychological perspective. In Rosenzweg, M. R., & Porter, L. W. (eds.) Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Melewar, T. C., & Jenkin, E. (2002). Defining the corporate identity construct. Corporation Reputation Review, 5 (1), 76-90. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372-368. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). E-O Linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press. O’Reilly, C. & Chatman, J. (1986). “Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499. Perrow, C. (1961). “Organizational prestige: Some functions and dysfunctions.” American Journal of Sociology, 61, 373-391. Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609. Pratt, M. G.. (1998). To be or not to be: Central question in organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row: New York. Proter, T. B. (2001). Theorizing organizational identity. Academy of management Proceedings, OM: D1-D5. Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1987). Expression of emotion as part of the work rule. Academy of Management Review, 12, 23-27. Reger, R. K., Gustafson, L. T., DeMarie, S. M., & Mullane, J. V. (1994). Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy Management Review. 19, 565-584. Rindova, V. P., & Schultz. M. (1998). Identity within and identity without: Lesson from corporate and organizational identity. In D. A. Whetten and P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations, 46-55. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Selame, E. & Selame, J. (1988). The Company Image: Building Your Identity and Influence in the Marketplace. New York: Wiley. Scott, S. G.. & Lane, V.R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 43-62. Shrout, P.E. & J. L. Fleiss (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428. Steele, C. M. (1988). “The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self.” In Leonard Bekowitz (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261-302. New York: Academic Press. Stimpert, J. L., Gustafson, L.T., & Yolanda, Y. (1998). Organizational identity with the strategic management conversation: Contribution and assumption. In D.A. Whetten & P.C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations, 83-98. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Sutton, R. I. & Rafaeli, A. (1988). Untangling the relationship between displayed emotion and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Academy of Management Journal, 311, 461-487. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93. Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology intergoup relations, 77-98. London: Academic Press. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1985). “The social identity theory of intergroup behavior.” In Steven Worchel and William G. Austin (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2, 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell. Van Dyne, L, Graham, J. W., & Dienesch R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765-802. Van Reil, C.B.M. & Blamer, J.M.T. (1997). Corporate identity: The concept, its measurement and management. European Journal of Marketing, 31 (5), 340-353. Vardi, Y., Wiener, Y., & Poppa, M. (1989). “The value content of organizational mission as a factor in the commitment of members.” Psychological Reports, 65, 27-34. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development an validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. Whetten D. A, & Godfrey, P.C. (1998) Identity in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Whetten, D. A., Lewis, D., & Mischel, L. J. (1992). Towards an integrated model of organizational identity and member commitment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Las Vegas. Yang, K. S. (1981b). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 159–170. Yang, K. S. (1992). Chinese social orientation: The perspective of social orientation. The psyche and behavior of Chinese people – Method and Principle. In Yang K. S. and Yu, A. B. (Eds.) Taipei: Kuai Kuan. (In Chinese). 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎 (1992)。組織認同:理論與本質之初步探索分析。中山管理評論,10 (1), 45-64。 楊國樞 (1992). 中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點. 中國人的心理與行為- 方法與理念篇(一九九二). 楊國樞、余安邦(主編)(1993). 臺北:桂冠圖 書公司. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39107 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究收集來自26所台灣大專院校、623位學生的受試者資料,用以探討組織認定、組織形象與組織聲譽三者彼此間的關係與效果。在個人層次上,研究發現學生個人對所屬學校的認定或形象建構越正面,其對所屬學校的組織承諾感與正向情緒越高,並且會展現較多的組織公民行為。更進一步的分析顯示,當學生個人對學校的組織認定和其所知覺到的外界形象建構有正向契合時,促使其展現正面行為(組織承諾感、正向情緒與組織公民行為)的效果最佳,個人組織認定與形象建構不契合時效果次之,二者有負向契合時效果最差。此外,在華人社會中,正向之形象建構對個人展現正面行為的促發效果較正向之組織認定要高。
在組織層次上,學校的認定、形象或聲譽越正面,該學校在組織層次上關於組織承諾感、組織公民行為與正向情緒的加總指標程度越高,在大學評鑑資料中的表現也越佳。兩兩比較組織認定、形象或聲譽的契合性時,發現具有正向契合時學校的表現最佳,不契合時其表現次之,而負向契合時表現最差。同樣的,在華人社會中,正向的組織形象對學校表現之影響較正向的組織認定要大。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research examines the effect of organizational identity, image, and reputation by data collected from 623 students in 26 universities in Taiwan. At individual level the research result shows the more positive a member’s perceived organizational identity or construed external image is, the better the member’s outcome. The individual outcomes is the best for members being favorably congruent, second best for being incongruent, and worst for being unfavorably congruent, in identity and image comparison. Also, members with more positive construed external image in Chinese society where other orientation is emphasized show better outcome than members with more positive perceived organizational identity. At organizational level the result shows the more positive the organizational identity, image, or reputation is, the better the organization’s outcome. Certain organizational outcomes achieve the best for organizations being favorably congruent, second best for being incongruent, and worst for being unfavorably congruent, in identity-image, identity-reputation, and image-reputation comparisons. Moreover, Chinese organizations in which other orientation is emphasized show better outcome with more positive organizational image than organizations with more positive identity. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:02:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R91227033-1.pdf: 791402 bytes, checksum: 67d32de5ec6a3e09e31ac44a348f94ba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………………..1
Research Background…………………………………………..………………….1 Research Objective……………………………………………..………………….3 Chapter Two: Literature Review……………………………………………………....4 Organizational Identity……………………….…………………..………………..4 Organizational Image……………………………………………..……………….9 Organizational Reputation………………………………………..………………11 A Holistic View……………………………………………………..……………13 Congruity Settings…………………………………………………..……………15 Individual and Organizational Outcome……………………………..…………..19 Individual Level Effect……………………………………..…………………….24 Organizational Level Effect……………………………………..……………….37 Research Framework……………………………………………………..………58 Chapter Three: Research Methodology………………………………………………60 Research Participants………………………………………………..…………...60 Research Methods….……………………………………………………..….......62 Research Procedures…………………………………………………..………….76 Data Analysis…………………………………………………………..…………77 Chapter Four: Individual Level Research Result…………………………………….80 Correlations of Key Variables………………………………………………..…..80 The Effect of Perceived Organizational Identity and Construed External Image..84 Chapter Five: Organizational Level Research Result………………………………..93 Correlations of Key Variables……………………………………………………93 The Effect of Organizational Identity, Image, and Reputation…………………..97 Chapter Six: Discussion…………………………………………………………….113 Research Findings………………………………………………………………113 Research Limits…………………………………………………………………120 Future Research Directions……………………………………………………..122 Implications for Organizational Theory and Practice…………………………..123 References…………………………………………………………………………..126 Appendix A: Student Questionnaire………………………………………………...138 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 組織認定、組織形象與組織聲譽:在個人與組織層次上的內外在知覺差異效果 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Organizational Identity, Image, and Reputation: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Effect in Various Congruity Settings | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳彰儀,徐瑋伶,賴志超,練乃華 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 他人取向,負向契合,不契合,正向契合,組織認定建構,組織形象建構,組織認定,組織形象,組織聲譽, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Other Orientation,Unfavorably Congruent,Perceived Organizational Identity (POI),Construed External Image (CEI),Organizational Identity (OI),Organizational Image (OM),Organizational Reputation (OR),Favorably Congruent,Incongruent, | en |
dc.relation.page | 143 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-01-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 772.85 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。