請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38062
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳明郎(Been-Lon Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hui Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 盧佳慧 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:59:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-05-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Abel, A.B., 1985, Dynamic behavior of capital accumulation in a cash-in-advance model, Journal of Monetary Economics 16, 55−71.
2. Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., G. Monteiro, and S.J. Turnovsky, 2004, Habit formation, catching up with the Joneses, and economic growth, Journal of Economic Growth 9, 47-80. 3. Asako, K., 1983, The utility function and the superneutrality of money on the transition path, Econometrica 51, 1593-96. 4. Auerbach, A. and M. Obstfeld, 2005, The case for open-market purchases in a liquidity trap, American Economic Review 95, 110-137. 5. Azariadis, C., 1996, The economics of poverty traps part one: complete markets, Journal of Economic Growth 1, 449-486. 6. Azariadis, C. and A. Drazen, 1990, Threshold externalities in economic development, Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 501-26. 7. Bakshi, G.S. and Z. Chen, 1996, The spirit of capitalism and stock-market prices, American Economic Review 86, 133-57. 8. Banerjee, A.V. and A.F. Newman, 1993, Occupational choice and the process of development, Journal of Political Economy 101, 274-98. 9. Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin, 1995, Economic Growth, New York: McGraw Hill. 10. Bates, T.W., K.M. Kahle and R.M. Stulz, 2006, Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? NBER working paper 12534. 11. Baumol, W.J., 1952 The transactions demand for cash: an inventory theoretic approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics 66, 545-56. 12. Beaudry, P., and F. Portier, 2004, An exploration into Pigou's theory of cycles, Journal of Monetary Economics 51, 1183−16. 13. Becker, G.S. and C.B. Mulligan, 1997, The endogenous determination of time preference, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 729-58. 14. Becsi, Z., P. Wang and M.A. Wynne, 1999, Costly intermediation, the big push and the big crash, Journal of Development Economics 59, 275-293. 15. Benabou, R., 1996, Equity and Efficiency in human capital investment: the local connection, Review of Economic Studies 63, 237-264. 16. Blanchard, O.J. and S. Fischer, 1989, Lectures on Macroeconomics, Cambridge: MIT Press. 17. Böhm-Bawerk, E.V., 1889, Positive theory of capital, translated 1959 by G. D. Huncke, Illinois: South Holland. 18. Bowles, S. and H. Gintis, 1992, Power and wealth in a competitive capitalist economy, Philosophy and Public Affairs 21, 324-53. 19. Boyd, J.H. and B.D. Smith, 1998, Capital market imperfections in a monetary growth model, Economic Theory 11, 241-73. 20. Brock, W.A., 1974, Money and growth: The case of long run perfect foresight, International Economic Review 15, 750-77. 21. Bruno, M. and W. Easterly, 1998, Inflation crises and long-run growth, Journal of Monetary Economics 41, 3-26. 22. Campbell, C.D. and G. Tullock, 1957, Some little-understated aspects of Korea’s monetary and fiscal systems, American Economic Review 47, 336-49. 23. Cavallo, D., 1996, Lessons from the stabilization process in Argentina, 1990-1996, in Symposium Proceedings: Achieving Price Stability, 169-177, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank. 24. Chang, W.Y., Y.N. Hsieh and C.C. Lai, 2000, Social status, inflation and endogenous growth in a cash-in-advance economy, European Journal of Political Economy 16, 535-45. 25. Chang, W.Y. and H.F Tsai, 2003, Mooney, social status and capital accumulation in a cash-in-advance model, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35, 657-61. 26. Chen, B.L., 2007, Multiple BGPs in a growth model with habit persistence, Journal of Money,Credit and Banking 39, 25-48. 27. Chen, B.L. and K. Shimomura, 1998, Self-fulfilling expectations and economic growth: a model of technology adoption and industrialization, International Economic Review 39, 151-70. 28. Chen, S.H. and J.T. Guo, 2007, On the growth and velocity effects of money, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside. 29. Christiano, L, R. Motto, and M. Rostagno, 2006, Monetary policy and stock market boom-bust cycles, working paper. 30. Clower, R.W., 1967, A reconsideration of the micro foundations of monetary theory, Western Economic Journal 6, 1−9. 31. Cole, H.L., G.J. Mailath, and A. Postlewaite, 1992, Social norms, saving behavior, and growth, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1092-1125. 32. Cooley, T.F., 1995, Frontiers of business cycle research, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 33. Cooper, R. and J. Ejarque, 1995, Financial intermediation and the great depression: a multiple equilibrium interpretation.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 43, 285-323. 34. Corneo, G. and O. Jeanne, 1997, On relative wealth effects and the optimality of growth, Economics Letters 54, 87-92. 35. Crettez, B., P. Michel and B. Wigniolle, 1999, Cash-in-advance constraints in the Diamond overlapping generations model: neutrality and optimality of monetary policies, Oxford Economic Papers 51, 431-52. 36. Diaz-Alejandro, C.F., 1984, Latin American debit: I don’t think we are in Kansas anymore, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1984, 335-89. 37. Dornbush, R. and J.A. Frenkel, 1973, Inflation and growth: Alternative approaches, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 5, 141-56. 38. Dotsey, M. and P.D. Sarte, 2000, Inflation uncertainty and growth in a cash-in-advance economy, Journal of Monetary Economics 35, 631-55. 39. Epstein, L.G., 1987, A simple dynamic general equilibrium model, Journal of Economic Theory 41, 68-95. 40. Epstein, L.G. and J.A. Hynes, 1983,“The rate of time preference and dynamic analysis, Journal of Political Economy 91, 611-35. 41. Feenstra, R.C., 1986, Functional equivalence between liquidity costs and the utility of money, Journal of Monetary Economics 17, 271-91. 42. Fisher, I., 1930, The Theory of Interest, reprinted 1986 by Augustus M. Kelly, Publishers, NJ. 43. Friedman, M., 1953, Choice, change, and the personal distribution of income, Journal of Political Economy 61, 277-90. 44. Friedman, M., 1977, Nobel lecture: inflation and unemployment, Journal of Political Economy 85, 451-72. 45. Friedman, M. and L. Savage, 1948, The utility analysis of choices involving risk, Journal of Political Economy 56, 279-304. 46. Futagami, K. and A. Shibata, 1998, Keeping one step ahead of the Joneses: status, the distribution of wealth, and long run growth, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 36, 109-26. 47. Galor, O., 1992, A two-sector overlapping generations model: a global characterization of the dynamical system.” Econometrica 60, 1351-86. 48. Galor, O., 1996, Convergence? Inferences from theoretical models, Economic Journal 106, 1056-69. 49. Galor, O. and H. Ryder, 1989, Existence, uniqueness, and stability of equilibrium in an overlapping generations model with productive capital, Journal of Economic Theory 49, 360-75. 50. Galor, O. and D. Weil, 2000, Population, technology and growth: from the Malthusian regime to the demographic transition and beyond, American Economic Review 110, 806-28. 51. Galor. O. and J. Zeira, 1993, Income distribution and macroeconomics, Review of Economic Studies 60, 35-52. 52. Gong, L. and H. Zou, 2001, Money, social status, and capital accumulation in a cash-in-advance model, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44, 284-93. 53. Gray, M. and S.J. Turnovsky, 1979, The stability of exchange rate dynamics under perfect myopic foresight, International Economic Review 7, 643−60. 54. Hayakawa, H., 1995, The complete complementarity of consumption and real balances and the strong superneutrality of money, Economics Letters 48, 91-97. 55. Hartzell, J.C., C. Titman and G.J. Twite, 2006, Why do firms hold so much cash? A tax based explanation, University of Texas working paper. 56. Jaimovich, N. and S. Rebelo, 2006, Can news about the future drive the business cycle, NBER Working Papers: 12537. 57. Jensen, M., 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers, American Economic Review 76, 323-329. 58. Jones, C.I., 2003, Growth, capital share, and a new perspective on production functions, mimeo., UC Berkley. 59. Kim, Y.Y. and S. Kim, 1996, Korean inflation during the U.S. military administration of 1945-48, Southern Economic Journal 63, 378-87. 60. Koompmans, T.C., 1960, Stationary ordinary utility and impatience, Econometrica 28, 287-309. 61. Krugman, P., 1987, The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: notes on trade in the process of dynamic economics of scale, Journal of Development Economics 27, 41-55. 62. Kurz, M., 1968, Optimal economic growth and wealth effects, International Economic Review 9, 348-57. 63. Lawrence, E.C., 1991, Poverty and the rate of time preference: evidence from panel data, Journal of Political Economy 99, 54-77. 64. Lucas, R.E. Jr., 1980, Equilibrium in a pure currency economy, Economic Inquiry 18, 203−20. 65. Lucas, Jr., R.E., and N. Stokey, 1984, Optimal growth with many consumers, Journal of Economic Theory 32, 139-71. 66. Ludvigson, S., 1999, Consumption and credit: a model of time-varying liquidity constraints, Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 434-47. 67. Makinen, G..E. and G.T. Woodward, 1989, The Taiwanese hyperinflation and stabilization of 1945-1952, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 21, 90-105. 68. Mankiw, N.G., 1989, Real business cycles: a new-Keynesian perspective, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 79-90. 69. Mankiw, G., D. Romer and D. Weil, 1992, A contribution to the Empirics of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407-37. 70. Matsuyama, K., 1991, Increasing returns, industrialization and indeterminacy of equilibrium, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 617-50. 71. Meng, Q., 2006, Impatience and equilibrium indeterminacy, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30, 2671-92. 72. Mulligan, C.B., 1997, Scale economies, the value of time, and the demand for cash: longitudinal evidence from firms, Journal of Political Economy 105, 1061-79. 73. Ogaki, M. and A. Atkeson, 1997, Rate of time preference, intertemporal elasticity of substitution, and level of wealth, Review of Economics and Statistics 79, 564-72. 74. Ogawa, K., 1993, Economic development and time preference schedule, Journal of Development Economics 42 175-95. 75. Obstfeld, M., 1990, Intertemporal dependence, impatience and dynamics, Journal of Monetary Economics 26, 45-75. 76. Opler, T., L. Pinkowitz, R. Sulz and R. Williamson, 1999, The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings, Journal of Financial Economics 52, 3-46. 77. Palivos, T., P. Wang and J. Zhang, 1993, Velocity of money in a modified cash-in-advance economy: theory and evidence, Journal of Macroeconomics 15, 225-48. 78. Robson, A.J., 1992, Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk, Econometrica 60, 837-57. 79. Samuelson, P.A., 1948, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA, Harvard. 80. Sargent, T.J. and N. Wallace, 1973, The stability of models of model and growth with perfect foresight, Econometrica 31, 1043−48. 81. Saving, T.R., 1971, Transaction costs and the demand for money, American Economic Review 61, 407-20. 82. Shimomura, K. 2004, Indeterminacy in a dynamic general equilibrium model of international trade.” in Human Capital, Trade and Public Policy in Rapidly Growing Economies: From Theory to Empirics, B.L. Chen, M. Boldrin and P. Wang eds., Aldershot, 153-69, UK: Edward Elgar 83. Sidrauski, M., 1967, Inflation and economic growth, Journal of Political Economy 75, 796-810. 84. Stiglitz, J.E. and A. Weiss, 1983, Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information American Economic Review 71, 393-409. 85. Stockman, A.C., 1981, Anticipated inflation and the capital stock in a cash-in-advance economy, Journal of Monetary Economics 8, 387−93. 86. Taylor, A.M., 1994, Three Phases of Argentine economic growth, NBER Historical Paper No. 60, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. 87. Tobin, J., 1965, Money and economic growth, Econometrica 33, 671-84. 88. Tsiang, S.C., 1980, Fashions and misconceptions in monetary theory and their influences on financial and banking policies, Zeitschrift-fur-die-gesamte-Staatswissenchaft 136, 584-604. 89. Turnovsky, S.J. and G. Monteiro, 2005, Consumption externalities, production externalities, and efficient capital accumulation under time non-separable preferences, European Economic Review, forthcoming. 90. Uzawa, H., 1968, Time preference, the consumption, and optimal asset holdings, In Value,Capital, and Growth: Papers in Honor of Sir John Hicks, edited by James N. Wolfe, pp.485-504. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. 91. Veblen, T., 1899, A Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Macmillan. 92. Wan Jr., H.Y., 1970, Optimal saving programs under intertemporally dependent preferences, International Economic Review 11, 521-47. 93. Wang, P. and C. K. Yip, 1992, Alternative approaches to money and growth, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23, 553–62. 94. Wilson, C.A., 1979, Anticipated shocks and exchange rate dynamics, Journal of Political Economy 87, 639–47. 95. Zhang, J., 2000, Inflation and growth: Pecuniary transactions costs and qualitative equivalence, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 32, 1-12. 96. Zou, H.F., 1994, The spirit of capitalism and long-run growth, European Journal of Political Economy 10, 279-93. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38062 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation includes three essays on monetary economics in optimal growth model. The first essay studies the role of an endogenous time preference on the relationship between inflation and growth in the long run in both the MIUF and TC models. We establish a qualitative equivalence between the two models in a setup without a labor-leisure tradeoff. When the time preference is decreasing (or increasing) in consumption and real balances, both the MIUF and TC models are qualitatively equivalent in terms of predicting a negative (or positive) relationship between inflation and growth in a steady state. Both a decreasing and an increasing time preference in consumption are consistent with the arguments found within in the literature. While a decreasing time preference in real balances corroborates with empirical evidence, there is no evidence in support of an increasing time preference in real balances.
The second essay studies the dynamic behavior of capital accumulation in a neoclassical growth model with a CIA constraint. This essay contributes to existing literature in two respects. First, a general CIA constraint is considered. We allow for the degree of CIA constraints on investment relative to that on consumption smaller or larger than one. Second, we analyze the dynamic equilibrium path of monetary shocks as opposed to a steady-state path in existing studies. Three types of shock to monetary supply are envisaged, both in terms of a permanent and a temporary shock. The dynamic behavior of equilibrium paths depends crucially on whether the relative degree of CIA constraints on investment is larger or smaller than one. Existing literature with the relative degree of CIA constraints on investment equaling or smaller than one is at the risk of neglecting the predicted patterns of equilibrium paths associated with another side of the relative CIA constraints. In order to explain multiple growth regimes, one of the most popular working hypotheses is based on initial conditions along with assumptions such as nonlinearities of production, subsistence consumption and heterogeneous agents/savings behavior. The third essay argues that a standard optimal growth model with a status effect represented by wealth naturally establishes multiple growth regimes without reliance on other assumptions. With a welfare effect, the resulting equilibrium distribution is characterized by a group with a lower level of income and another group with a higher level of income. Globally, a sufficiently strong monetary policy may be an instrument in order for an economy in a poverty trap to take off and become wealthy in the long run. Locally, our model sheds light on the relationship between money/inflation and capital in the long run that, given general cash-in-advance constraints on investment relative to consumption, is determined by the curvature of the utilities of wealth and consumption. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:59:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-F92323017-1.pdf: 1020259 bytes, checksum: ae764c56693a908ba334bd23e201af7a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv 1 Introduction 1 References 9 2 Inflation and Growth: Impatience and a qualitative Equivalence 13 2.1 Introduction 13 2.2 A MIUF Model 17 2.3 Transaction Costs Model 23 2.4 Concluding Remarks 28 References 30 3 The Dynamic Behavior of Capital Accumulation in a General Cash-in-Advance Model 35 3.1 Introduction 35 3.2 The Model 39 3.2.1 Optimization conditions 40 3.2.2 Equilibrium 41 3.2.3 Steady State 43 3.3 The Dynamic Effects of Money Supply Shocks 44 3.3.1 A Permanent Increase in Monetary Growth 46 3.3.2 A Temporary Increase in Monetary Growth 48 3.3.3 A Permanent Announcement Effect 49 3.3.4 A Temporary Announcement Effect 51 3.3.5 A Permanent False News Shock 51 3.3.6 A Temporary False News Shock 54 3.4 Cost of the Business Cycle and Speed of Adjustment 55 3.4.1 Cost of the Business Cycle 55 3.4.2 Speed of Adjustment 58 3.5 Concluding Remarks 59 References 60 4 Wealth and Multiple Growth Regimes: The Role of Monetary Policy 73 4.1 Introduction 73 4.2 The Model 76 4.2.1 Optimization 78 4.2.2 Equilibrium 79 4.2.3 Steady State 80 4.3 Characterization of Equilibrium 83 4.3.1 Local Analysis 84 4.3.2 Global Analysis 86 4.3.3 A Numerical Example 89 4.4 Concluding Remarks 90 References 91 Appendix: The local stability property of the model is proved as follows. 97 5 Conclusion 103 References 105 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 貨幣經濟學在最適成長模型之三篇論文 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Three Essays on Monetary Economics in Optimal Growth Model | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Costas Azariadis(Costas Azariadis),Michele Boldrin(Michele Boldrin),徐美(Mei Hsu),王平(Ping Wang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 內生時間偏好率,質性等價,資本累積,現金模型,動態,財富效果,貧窮陷阱, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | endogenous time preferences,qualitative equivalence,capital accumulation,CIA constraint,dynamics,wealth effect,development trap, | en |
dc.relation.page | 106 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-05-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 996.35 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。