請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34601
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張育森(Yu-Sen Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yung-Liang Peng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 彭永良 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:17:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-02-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-01-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王麗婷. 1998. 自然源揮發性有機物現場觀測與排放量推估之研究. 國立雲林科技大學環境與安全工程系碩士論文.
2. 吳金村. 2004. 森林釋出異戊二烯對大氣品質之影響. 林業研究專訊.11(6):10-12. 3. 吳泄澤. 2000. 本土樹種揮發性有機物排放系數與環境因子影響之研究. 國立雲林科技大學環境與安全工程技術研究所碩士論文. 4. 李昆龍. 2004. 台灣地區常見植物排放異戊二烯之研究. 國立台學植物病理與微生物學研究所碩士論文. 5. 武維華、張蜀秋、袁明、張軍.2003.植物生理學.科學出版社. 6. 姚銘輝、盧虎生、朱鈞.2002. 葉綠素螢光與作物生理反應. 科學農業50(1,2):31-41. 7. 孫岩章. 2002. 植物對臭氧及多種有毒氣體的吸收與淨化. 生物源揮發性有機物與臭氧污染國際研討會論文集. 國立雲林科技大學. 8. 孫岩章. 2004. 樹木對淨化生物源揮發性有機物等空氣污染物評估計畫期末報告. 行政院環境保護署九十二年度科技研究計畫. 9. 孫岩章. 2005. 常用樹木對淨化源揮發性有機物與空氣污染之評估計畫. 行政院環境保護署科技研究計畫. 10. 徐鈺雯. 2004. 缺水逆境對檸檬桉釋出異戊二烯之影響. 國立中興大學森林學系研究所碩士論文. 11. 張艮輝、陳杜甫、游智淵. 2002. 生物源揮發性有機物排放量之模式推估. 生物源揮發性有機物與臭氧污染國際研討會論文集. 國立雲林科技大學. 12. 張育森. 1997. 台北市街道行道樹綠化現況與展望. 環境綠化(27):58-66. 13. 張莉、白艷瑩、王效科、歐陽志雲、牟玉靜、繆啟龍. 2002. 浙江省毛竹異戊二烯排放規律及其影響. 生態學報.22(8):1339-1334 14. 張福珠、苗鴻、魯純. 1994. 落葉闊葉林釋放異戊二烯的研究. 環境科學. 15(1):1-5. 15. 彭于珍. 2004. 熱逆境對檸檬桉釋出異戊二烯之影響. 國立中興大學森林學系研究所碩士論文. 16. 游榮華. 2000. 植物排放異戊二烯對大氣環境之影響. 國立雲林科技大學環境與安全工程技術研究所碩士論文. 17. 葉雲卿. 1995. 不同樹種異戊二烯排放系數之研究. 國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文. 18. 趙廣東、劉世榮. 2002. 植物源異戊二烯及其生態意義.應用生態學報. 13(4):505-509. 19. 劉悅萍、宮飛、趙曉萌.2005. 水楊酸介導的信號轉導途徑與植物抗逆性.中國農學通報21(7):227-229. 20. 潘瑞熾、王小菁、李娘輝.2004. 植物生理學.高等教育出版社.P112 21. 蔡志全、秦秀英. 2002. 植物釋放揮發性有機物(VOCs)的研究發展. 生態科學21(1):86-90. 22. 鄭福田. 2002. 植物對空氣品性之綜合影響. 生物源揮發性有機物與臭氧污染國際研討會論文集. 國立雲林科技大學. 23. Arey, J., A. M. Winer, R. Atkinson, S. M. Aschmann, W. D. Long, C. L. Morrison and D. M. Olszyk. 1991. Terpenes emitted from agricultural species found in California's Central Valley. J. Geophys. Res. 96:9329-9336. 24. Bazza, F.1990. The response of natural systems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annual review of ecology and systematic.121:167-196. 25. Blacet, F. E. 1952. Photochemistry in the lower atmosphere. Ind. Eng. Chem. 44: 1339-1952. 26. Buckley, P. T. 2001. Isoprene emission from a Florida scrub oak species grown in ambient and elevated carbon dioxide. Atmosph.Environ.35:631-634. 27. Beijamin, M. 1996. Low-emission urban forests:Ataxonomic methodology for assessing isoprene and monoteroene emission rates. Atmosph. Environ. 30:1437-1452. 28. Chang, K. H., T. F. Chen and H. C. Huang. 2005. Estimation of biogenic volatile organic compounds emissions in subtropical island-Taiwan. Sci. total environ. 346:184-199. 29. Fall, R. and M. C. Wildermuch. 1998. Isoprene synthesis: From biochemical mechanism to emission algorithm. J. Geophys. Res. 103: 25599-25606. 30. Funk, J. L., J. E. Mak, and M. T. Lerdau. 2004. Stress-induced changes in carbon sources for isoprene production in Populus deltoids. Plant. Cell and Environment 27:747-755. 31. Grennfelt , P. and J. Schjoldager. 1984. Phytochemical oxidants in the troposphere: A mounting menace. AMBIO 13:61-67. 32. Guenther, A. C. N. Hewitt and D. Erickson. 1995. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emission. J. Geophys. Res.100:8873-8892. 33. Guenther, A., P. Zimmerman, L. Klinger, J. Greenberg, C. Ennis, K. Davis, W. Pollock, H . Westberg, G.Allwine and C. Geron. 1996. Estimates of regional natural volatile organic compound fluxes from enclosure and ambient measurements. J. Geophy. Res.101(1): 1345-1360. 34. Guenther, A., P. Zimmerman and M. Wildermuth. 1994. Natural volatile organic compound emission rate estimates for U.S. woodland landscapes. Atmos. Environ. 28(6):1197-1210. 35. Grinspoon, J., W. D. Bowman and R. Fall. 1991. Delayed onset of isoprene emission in developing velvet bean (Mucuna sp.) leaves. Plant Physiol. 97:170-174. 36. Hanson, D. T. and T. D. Sharkey. 2001. Rate of acclimation of the capacity for isoprene emission in response to light and temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 24:937-946. 37. Harrison, D., M. C. Hunter, A. C. Lewis, P. W. Seakins, T. V. Nunes and C. A. Pio. 2001. Isoprene and monoterpene emission from the conferous species Abies-borisiiregis-implications for regional air chemistry in Greece. Atmosph. Environ. 34:4687-4698. 38. Ingram, D .L. 1985. Modeling high temperature and exposure time interactions on Pittosporum tobira root cell membrane thermostabilty. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110(4):470-473. 39. Ingram, D. L. and D. W. Buchanan. 1984. Lethal high temperatures for roots of three citrus rootstocks. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109(2):189-193. 40. Jacob, D. J., J.A. Logan, G. M. Gardner, R. M. Yevich, C. M. Spivakowsky, S. C. Wofsy, S. Sillman and M. J. Prather. 1993. Factors regulating ozone over the United States and its export to the global atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 98:14817-14827. 41. Jianhui, B. and B. Baker. 2004. Model simulation of isoprene emission flux in a tropical forest plantation of rubber trees. Acta Scientiae Circums.24(2)197-207. 42. Jones, C. A. and R. A. Rasmussen. 1975. Production of isoprene by leaf tissue. Plant Physiol. 55(6): 982–987. 43. Keller, M. and M .Lerdau. 1999.Isoprene emission from tropical forest canopy leaves. Global Biogeochem. Cycles13:19-29. 44. Krupa, S. U. and W. J. Manning. 1988. Atmospheric ozone: Formation and effects on vegetation. Environ. Pollut. 50:101-137 45. Kuzma, J. and R. Fall . 1993. Leaf isoprene emission rate is dependent on leaf development and the level of isoprene synthase. Plant Physiol 101: 435-440 46. Kuzma, J. M., M. Nemecek and W. H. Pollock. 1995. Bacteria produce the volatile hydrocarbon isoprene. Curr. Microbiol.30:97-103 47. Kuzuyama, T. T. Shimizu, S. Takahashi and H. Seto. 1998. Fosmidomycin, a specific inhibitor of 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5 phosphate reductoisomerase in the nonmevalonate pathway for terpenoid biosynthesis. Tetrahedron Letters.39:7913-7916. 48. Lamb, B., H. Westberg, G. Allwine and T. Quarles. 1985, Biogenic hydrocarbon emissions from deciduous and coniferous trees in the United States, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 2380-2390. 49. Lerdau, M. A. Guenther and R. Monson. 1997. Plant production and emission of volatile organic compounds.BioSci.47:373-383. 50. Lerdau, M. T. and M. Keller .1997. Control on isoprene emission from trees in a subtropical dry forest. Plant Cell Environ. 20:569-578. 51. Logan ,B. A., R. K. Monson and M. J. Potosnak. 2000. Biochemistry and physiology of foliar isoprene production. Trends Plant Sci. 5(11)477-481. 52. Loreto, F. 1997. Emission of isoprene by plants: Their role in atmospheric chemistry, response to the environment, and biochemical pathway. J. Environ. Pathol. Tax Onc. 16(2,3):119-124. 53. Loreto, F. and S. Delfine. 2000. Emission of isoprene from salt-stressed Eucalyptus globulus leaves. Plant Physiol 123: 1605-1610. 54. Loreto, F. and T. D. Sharkey. 1993.Isoprene emission by plants is affectsed by transmissible wound signals. Plant Cell Environ.16:563-570. 55. Loreto, F. and T. D. Sharkey. 1993. On the relationship between isoprene emission and photosynthetic metabolites under different environmental conditions. Planta. 189:420-424. 56. Loreto, F., P. Nascetti and A. Graverini. 2002. Emission and content of monoterpenes in intact and wounded needles of the Mediterranean pine, Pinus pinea. Funct Ecol.14:589-595. 57. Monson, R. K. and R.Fall.1989 Isoprene emission from aspen leaves. Plant Physiol. 90(1):267-274. 58. Meier, J. K., K. Bode, L. Schafer, G.. Schebesk, A. Wolf, E. Brancaleoni, A. Cecinato, P. Ciccioli, M. Frattoni, L. Dutaur, J. L. Fugit, V. Simon and L. Torres. 1998 Simultaneous field measurements of terpene and isoprene emission from two dominant mediterranea oak species in relation to a north American species. Atmos. Environ. 32(11):1947-1953. 59. Piea, P. A.1995. Isoprene emission rates from northern red oak using a whole-tree chamber. Atmos. Environ.29(12):1347-1353. 60. Rosenstiel, T. N., M. J. Potosnak, K. L. Griffin, R. Fall and R.K. Monson.2003.Increased CO2 uncouples growth from isoprene emission in an agriforest ecosystem. Nature advance online publication.421(16):256-259. 61. Schaff, D. A., C. D. Clayberg and G. A. Milliken. 1987 .Comparison of TTC and electrical conductivity heat tolerance screening techniques in Phaseolus. HortScience 22(4):642-645. 62. Sharkey, T. D. 1996. Isoprene synthesis by plants and animals. Endeavour.20(5):74-78. 63. Sharkey, T. D. and E. L. Singsaas. 1995. Why plants emit isoprene? Nature 374:769. 64. Sharkey, T. D., X. Chen and S.Yeh. 2001. Isoprene increases thermotolerance of fosmidomycin-fed leaves. Plant Physiol.125:2001-2006. 65. Sharkey, T. D., E. L. Singsaas and M. Lerdau. 1999. Weather effects on isoprene emission capacity and applications in emission algorithms. Ecol Appl. 9:1132-1137. 66. Silver, G. M. and R. Fall,1991. Enzymatic synthesis of isoprene from dimethylallyl diphosphate in aspen leaf extracts. Plant Physiol. 97(4): 1588–1591 67. Singsaas, E. L. and T. D. Sharkey.1998. The regulation of isoprene emission responses to rapid leaf temperature fluctuations. Plant Cell Environ. 21:1181-1188. 68. Singsaas, E. L. and T. D. Sharkey. 2000. The effects of high temperature on isoprene synthesis in oak leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 23:751-757. 69. Taiz,L. and E. Zeiger.2002 Plant Physiology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. 70. Tingey, D. T., M. Manning , L. C. Grothaus and W. F. Burns. 1979. Influence of light and temperature on isoprene emission rate from live oak. Plant Physiol.47:112-118. 71. Wagner, W. P., D. Helmig and R. Fall. 2000.Isoprene biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis via the methyerthritol phosphate pathway.J.Natl Prod,63:37-40. 72. Yeh, D. M. and P.Y. Hsu. 2004. Heat tolerance in English ivy as measured by an electrolyte leakage technique. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 79 (2) 298–302. 73. Zhang, X., J. Mu, W. Song and Y. Zhuang. 2000. Seasonal variations of isoprene emissions from deciduous trees. Atmos. Environ. 34:3027-3032. 74. Zhen, R. G. 2001. From inhibitors to target site genes and beyond-herbicidal inhibitor as powerful tools for functional genomics. Weed Sci. 49:266-272. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34601 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 植物在行光合作用、淨化空氣的同時,也可能釋放出生物源揮發性有機物,其中以異戊二烯的釋放為大宗。本研究擬針對常見的綠化植栽種類進行異戊二烯排放量的檢測,並進一步探討環境因子及化學藥劑種類對於異戊二烯釋放量的影響,期能建立本土性綠化植栽的異戊二烯釋放情形之基本資料。
本試驗使用聚丙烯枝條套袋圍封法,以火燄離子化檢測器進行分析,檢測結果顯示:在常見的78種綠化植栽中,依分類為桑科的榕樹、薜荔等12種、楊柳科的垂柳及水柳、蘇木科的羊蹄甲及金邊黃槐、棕櫚科的孔雀椰子、小薜科的南天竹及樟科的錫蘭肉桂等合計19種綠化植栽檢測出有異戊二烯的釋放情形,其餘的59種植栽種類則皆未能檢測到釋放情形發生。 進一步探討光線、溫度、水份及節位等因子對楓香異戊二烯生成之影響。隨著遮光程度的減少,異戊二烯釋放量有逐漸增加的趨勢,至全日照(遮光0%)時有異戊二烯最高的釋放量(92.2μg.g-1.h-1);日夜溫25/20℃時釋放量較少,30/25℃明顯上升,尤其35/30℃時有最高的異戊二烯的釋放量(28.7μg.g-1.h-1);缺水時異戊二烯釋放量明顯上升,在第五天有最高的釋放量(36.7μg.g-1.h-1),爾後逐漸降低;在節位方面,以靠近中段的6-10節有最大的釋放量(10.0μg.g-1.h-1),其次為基部的11-15節(8.0μg.g-1.h-1),由枝條頂端算起1-5節的釋放量為最低(4.6μg.g-1.h-1)。 楓香在處理Ethephon (100ppm)後檢測不出有異戊二烯的釋放;處理CaCl2(0.01M)、Fosmidomycin(4μM)及Jasmonic acid(10μM)後,異戊二烯釋放量由對照組的53.7μg.g-1.h-1降為1.3μg.g-1.h-1、0.5μg.g-1.h-1及2.2μg.g-1.h-1;而在處理Salicylic acid(1mM)後,異戊二烯釋放明顯增加約5倍的釋放量。楓香在50℃水浴30分鐘後的熱傷害值較能區分出處理間之葉片熱穩定性的差異,在對照組的熱傷害值大約在25.4%,抑制異戊二烯的釋放後,熱傷害值提高至33.7%;楓香植株處理Fosmidomycin(4μM)後先在40℃下處理60及120分鐘後,再以葉片進行50℃水浴熱致死時間試驗,在處理60分鐘後,熱致死時間約40.4分鐘後熱傷害值達到50%,而對照組在約44分鐘後才達到50%;處理120分鐘後,熱致死時間約在2.5分鐘即達50%熱傷害值,且在5分鐘內迅速升高至100%,由此間接證明經由異戊二烯的釋放可增加耐熱性及提高膜的穩定性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOCs) especially isoprene can be emissioned by some plants. This study was designed to measure the isoprene emission in ornamental plants and to probe the influence of the environmental and chemical factors on isoprene emission in order to build the database of isoprene for the local plants.
In this study, isoprene emission was measured in plants by PP plastic bag enclosure method in combination with GC-FID. Emission of isoprene were examined in 78 species of ornamental plants. Among them, isoprene emission could be detected in 19 species and bot be detected in 59 species. Effect of light , temperature and water on isoprene emission in Liquidamber formosana were measured. The results showed that the isoprene emission in plants increased with the light level. The shading degree lower to 0% had the highest isoprene emission (92.2 μg.g-1.h-1) and the increased emission with reduction of shading degree. During day/night temperature treatment , isoprene emission were low at and below 25/20℃ treatment and the emission became significant increased during 30/25~35/30℃, especially at 35/30℃(28.7 μg.g-1.h-1).Isoprene emission in plants increased after water stress treatment and the highest emission (36.7 μg.g-1.h-1) appeared at the 5th day, but the emission began decreasing at the 6th day. Regrading the isoprene emission on position of plants, the highest emission (10 μg.g-1.h-1)were on 6-10 nodes of medial shoot, then on 11-16 nodes of basic shoot had 8.0 μg.g-1.h-1 and emission on 1-5 nodes of top shoot were lowest. After Ethephon spraying, isoprene emission could not be detected in Liquidamber formosana. Spraying with different chemicals including CaCl2(0.01mol/L), Fosmidomycin(4μM) and Jasmonic acid(10 μmol/L), isoprene emission in plants was decreased to 1.3,0.5 and 2.2 μg.g-1.h-1 respectively, as compared with control treatment(53.7 μg.g-1.h-1).Isoprene emission from plants increased approximately 5 time after salicylic acid(1 mmol/L) treatment. Thermo stability for Liquidamber formosana by measuring the electrolyte leakage at 50℃ water bath for 30 minutes showed relative injury was 33.7% after Fosmidomycin(4 μM) spray treatment as compared with control treatment(25.4%).The plant was put under 40℃ for 30 and 120 minutes combination Fosmidomycin(4 μM) treatment and measure heat-killing time at 50℃ used leaf tissue by electrolyte leakage method.At 40℃ for 60 minutes , heat-killing time was 40.4 minutes after fosmidomycin spray , compared to the control(44.0 minutes),and during 120 minutes of 40℃ the heat-killing time was 2.5 minutes compared to the control(29.0 minutes). From these evidences, it is proved that plant can increase heat-tolerance and maintain membrane stability for plant. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:17:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92628132-1.pdf: 491142 bytes, checksum: f0d04fb291189d5edbd142efe0015321 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 (Introduction) 1
第二章 前人研究 (Literature Review) 2 一、異戊二烯之特性 2 二、異戊二烯的生合成途徑 2 (一)二羥甲基戊酸途徑(mevalonic acid pathway) 2 (二)甲基紅蘚糖醇磷酸途徑(methylerythritol phosphate pathway) 2 三、異戊二烯對環境的影響 3 四、異戊二烯的檢測方法 4 (一)葉圓片分析法(Leaf disk method) 4 (二)完全圍封法(Complete enclosure method) 4 (三)部分枝條圍封法(Branch enclosure method) 5 (四)微氣象法(Micrometeorology methods) 5 (五)追蹤劑法(Including tracer methods) 5 (六)植物學分類推估法(Taxonomic methods) 5 五、植物釋放異戊二烯的功用 5 (一)抗瞬間輻射熱與維持膜的穩定性 5 (二)迅速清除臭氧和OH.自由基 6 (三)能量的耗散 6 六、影響植物釋放異戊二烯的因子 6 (一)光強度 6 (二)溫度 6 (三)水份 7 (四)二氧化碳濃度 7 (五)植物分類地位 7 (六)葉齡 7 第三章 常見綠化植栽異戊二烯釋放之研究 8 一、前言(Introduction) 8 二、材料與方法(Materials and Methods) 8 (一)植物材料 8 (二)植物釋放異戊二烯之檢測方法 9 (三)袋內異戊二烯氣體濃度分析 9 三、結果(Results) 10 四、討論(Discussion) 10 第四章 光線、溫度、水份等因子對楓香異戊二烯生成之研究 17 一、前言(Introduction) 17 二、材料與方法(Materials and Methods) 18 (一)試驗一 遮光對於楓香異戊二烯釋放之影響 18 (二)試驗二 不同溫度對於楓香異戊二烯釋放之影響 18 (三)試驗三 水份逆境對於楓香異戊二烯釋放之影響 19 (四)試驗四不同時間、節位對於楓香異戊二烯釋放之影響 19 (五)試驗設計與統計分析 20 三、結果(Results) 20 四、討論(Discussion) 22 第五章 藥劑處理對楓香異戊二烯的釋放及耐熱性之研究 37 一、前言(Introduction) 37 二、材料與方法(Materials and Methods) 38 (一)試驗一 不同藥劑處理對楓香異戊二烯釋放之影響 38 (二)試驗二 異戊二烯與耐熱性之研究 39 (三)試驗設計與統計分析 39 三、結果(Results) 40 四、討論(Discussion) 41 中文摘要 47 Summary 49 參考文獻(References) 51 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 常見綠化植栽異戊二烯生成因子之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Factors of Isoprene Production from Ornamental Plants | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 孫岩章(En-Jang Sun) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張艮輝(Ken-Hui Chang),葉德銘(Der-Ming Yeh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 綠化植栽,異戊二烯,生物源揮發性有機物,聚丙烯枝條套袋圍封法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Ornamental Plants,Isoprene,Biogenic volatile organic compound,PP bag branch enclosure method, | en |
dc.relation.page | 56 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-01-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 479.63 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。