請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26804
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 簡怡雯(Yi-Wen Chien) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Ying Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳純瑩 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:26:28Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 郝仲鈺 (2006),“Consumers’ Correction for Judgments of Brand Extension: Bias Knowledge and Motivation,”國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
陳筱涵 (2006),“Effect of Bias-Specific vs. Nonbias-specific Knowledge on Brand Attitude: Correction for Perceived High-price Product Stereotype,” 國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文 吳柏蒼 (2005), “How Would Bias Knowledge Influence Consumers’ Attitude toward Products: Correction Behavior for Endorser and Mood Biases,”國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文 Bargh, John A. and Paula Pietromonaco (1982), “Automatic Information processing and Social Perception: The Influence of Trait Information Presented Outside of Conscious Awareness on Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(September), 437-449 Cacioppo, J. T., and Petty, R. E. (1982), “The Need for Cognition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131 Herr, Paul M. (1986), “Consequences of Priming: Judgment and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(December), 1106-1115 Herr, Paul M., (1989), “Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 67-75 Herr, Paul M., Steven J. Sherman and Russell H. Fazio (1983), “On the Consequences of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340 Higgins and Gillian A King (1981), “Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information-Processing Consequences of Individual and Contextual Variability,” in Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, eds. Nancy Cantor and John F. Kihlstrom, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, 69-121 Higgins, William S Rholes, and Carl R. Jones (1977), “Category Accessibility and Impression Formation,” Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 13(March), 141-154 Kubovy, Michael (1977), “Response Availability and the Apparent Spontaneity of Numerical Choices,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 359-364 Martin, L. L. (1986), “Set/reset: Use and Disuse of Concepts in Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504 Martin, L. L. and Achee, J. W. (1992), “Beyond Accessibility: The Role of Processing Objectives in Judgment,” The Construction of Social Judgment, 195-216. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Martin, L. L. and Seta, J. J. (1983), “Perceptions of Unity and Distinctiveness as Determinants of Attraction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 755-764 Martin, L. L. and Seta, J. J., and Crelia, R. A. (1990), “Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People’s Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37 Petty, R. E., and Wegener, D. T. (1993), “Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-induced Contrast,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137-165 Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., and Williams, K. D. (1980), “The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information Processing View,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 81-92 Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L. and Brock, T. C. (1976), “Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption versus Effort Justification,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884 Schwarz, N., and Bless, H. (1992), “Constructing Reality and its Alternatives: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model of Assimilation and Contrast Effect in Social Judgment,” In L. L. Martin and A. Tesser (Eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments, 217-245, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kubler, A., and Wanke, M. (1993), “Awareness of the Influence as a Determinant of Assimilation versus Contrast,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 53-62 Thompson, W. C., Fong, G. T., and Rosenhan, D. L. (1981), “Inadmissible Evidence and Juror Verdicts,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 453-463 Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A. and Geiselman, R. E. (1987), “A Formal Analysis of Ratings of Physical Attractiveness: Successive Contrast and Simultaneous Assimilation,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 230-356 Wegener, D. T. (1994), “The Flexible Correction Model: Using Naïve Theories of Bias to Correct Assessments of Targets,” Doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Wegener, D. T. and Petty, R. E. (1995), “Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: The Role of Naïve Theories in Corrections for Perceived Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51. Wegener, D. T. and Petty, R. E. (1997), “The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naïve Theories of Bias in Bias Correction,” Advanced in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 141-208. Wyer, R. S., and Budesheim, T. L. (1987), “Person Memory and Judgments: The Impact of Information That One is Told to Disregard,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 14-29 Wyer, R. S. and Srull, T. K. (1981), “Category Accessibility: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues Concerning the Processing of Social Stimulus Information,” Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, 1, 161-197, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26804 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要是將彈性修正模型(Flexible Correction Model)運用在消費者行為當中,此模型強調在擁有動機與能力下,人們的修正行為會依照其所知覺到的偏誤方向以及偏誤量來進行修正,而本實驗透過對代言人形象以及對目標產品整體市場表現的操弄,來觀察受測者的修正量。研究結果顯示,當未提及產品市場整體表現時,人們因為本性對事物擁有較為正面的期待,因此對於負面代言人會知覺到較多的偏誤,故其對負面代言人的偏誤修正量會高於正面形象代言人;當題及產品市場整體表現優良時,因市場表現成為一種人們判斷產品好壞的指標,人們知覺負面代言人所帶來的偏誤會高於正面代言人所形成的偏誤,進而對負面代言人有較高的修正量;若當市場整體表現皆為不良時,也會因市場表現成為一種判斷指標,而使得人們知覺正面代言人相較於負面代言人帶來較多的偏誤,進而對正面代言人有較多的偏誤修正量。除此之外,面對同一個代言人時,人們在不同市場表現情形下,其對修正量也應有差異,此部分的預測雖未獲得實驗結果的顯著支持,但其方向、量的大小與預測是一致的,若將樣本數放大,仍有可能驗證本研究的假設。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the current study, the Flexible Correction Model was applied to the consumer behavior field. According to this model, people with motivation and ability would execute correction behavior, and the direction and magnitude of correction behavior would base on their perceived bias. In this experiment, the endorsers’ images and the market performance of target product were manipulated to examine the different magnitude of correction behavior. Results showed that when the market performance was equivalent (equivalent), the magnitude of correction behavior toward the unfavorable endorser was larger than the favorable endorser since people might begin with relatively positive expectations. When the market was manipulated as superior, the market performance became an indicator. People would perceive more bias amount toward the unfavorable endorser and then the correction amount for the unfavorable endorser was larger comparing with the favorable endorser. If the market performance was manipulated as inferior, people would perceive more bias toward the favorable endorser comparing with the unfavorable endorser and the magnitude of correction behavior would be larger. In addition, when under the same endorser, the magnitude of correction behavior should be different toward different market performance. Although results showed that the correction amounts under different market performance were not different significantly, the direction and the magnitude of correction corresponded to what we expected. It was believed that the proposition of these two hypotheses would be supported when enlarging the sample size. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:26:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95741022-1.pdf: 724222 bytes, checksum: 787ebc1dc8557a971162c800f68583ab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌 謝......................................................i
摘 要.....................................................ii Abstract.................................................iii CHAPTER 1 STUDY PURPOSE...................................1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW...............................6 2.1 Context Effect-Assimilation and Contrast..........6 2.2 Correction Models.................................8 CHAPTER 3 PROPOSED THEORIES & HYPOTHESES.................17 3.1 Theory Foundation................................17 3.2 Hypotheses.......................................20 3.3 Uniqueness of the Current Study..................25 CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENT.....................................27 4.1 Pretest..........................................27 4.2 Main Experiment..................................30 4.3 Independent Variables............................35 4.4 Dependent Measure................................36 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS........................................39 5.1 Manipulation Checks..............................39 5.2 Dependent Variables..............................42 CHAPTER 6 GENERAL DISCUSSION.............................56 6.1 Conclusion .......................................56 6.2 Limitations......................................62 6.3 Managerial Implication...........................63 6.4 Future Research Direction and Suggestion.........65 REFERENCE................................................66 APPENDIX A-Questionnaires in Pretest.....................69 APPENDIX B-Questionnaires in Test........................77 APPENDIX C-Questionnaires in Retest......................87 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 影響消費者對代言人偏誤因子的修正量:
正面/負面代言人形象及產品市場整體表現的影響效果 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Factors Affecting the Magnitude of Correction for Endorser Effects:
Endorser's Image and Market Performance of the Target Product | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭中強(Chung-Chiang Hsiao),陳建維(Chien-Wei Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 偏誤修正,修正幅度,代言人,市場表現, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | bias correction,the magnitude of correction,endorser,market performance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 103 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 707.25 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。