請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26062
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王泰昌(Taychang Wang),劉嘉雯(Chiawen Liu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Cheng Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳俞丞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:59:25Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-06-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amihud, Y., and H. Mendelson. 1986. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics 17 (2):223-249.
Benninga, S. Z., and O. H. Sarig. 1997. Corporate finance: A valuation approach International Edition ed: The McGraw-Hill Companies, INC. Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72 (3):323-349. Botosan, C. A. 2004. The role of information precision in determining the cost of equity capital. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (2-3):233-259. Botosan, C. A., and M. A. Plumlee. 2002. A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (1):21-40. Brown, S., and S. A. Hillegeist. 2007. How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry. Review of Accounting Studies 12 (2-3):443-477. Chan, K., L. K. C. Chan, N. Jegadeesh, and J. Lakonishok. 2006. Earnings quality and stock returns. Journal of Business 79 (3):1041-1082. Chang, R.-D., C.-J. Fang. 2006. Effects of the information disclosure and evaluation system on earnings management. The International Journal of Accounting Studies 42:1-22 (In Chinese). Chang, W.-J., L.-T. Chou, and H.-W. Lin. 2003. Audit quality and discretionary accruals: A Study of Voluntary Forecast Firms. NTU Management Review 14 (1):1-46 (In Chinese). Chen, J.-P., C.-Y. Hsu. 2008. The effect of disclosure level on the cost of equity capital. Soochow Journal of Economics and Business 61: 67-108 (In Chinese). Cheng, H.-T. 2007. The effect of information disclosure and transparency ranking system of corporate earnings management, an examination of 2005 ranking results. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Chengchi University, Graduate Institute of Accounting. DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61 (3):400-420. Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance : The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18:3-42. Dechow, P. M., and I. D. Dechev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (supplement):35-59. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management The Accounting Review 70 (2):193-225. Diamond, D. W., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance 46 (4):1325-1359. Easley, D., S. Hvidkjaer, and M. O'Hara. 2002. Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? The Journal of Finance 57 (5):2185-2221. Easley, D., and M. O'Hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance 59 (4):1553-1583. Easton, P. D. 2004. PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review 79 (1):73-95. Easton, P. D., and G. A. Sommers. 2007. Effect of analyst's optimism on estimates of the expected rate of return implied by earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (5):983-1014. Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47 (2):427-465. Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33:3-56. Francis, J., R. Lafond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2003. Earnings quality and the pricing effect of earnings patterns. Working Paper, Duke University, University of Wisconsin, Duke University, Financial Accounting Standards Board. Francis, J., R. Lafond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79 (4):967-1010. Francis, J., R. Lafond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39:295-327. Francis, J., D. Nanda, and P. M. Olsson. 2008. Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality, and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (1):53-99. Francis, J., and L. Vincent. 2003. The relative and incremental explanatory power of earnings and alternative (to earnings) performance measures for returns. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (1):121-164. Frankel, R., M. McNichols, and G. P. Wilson. 1995. Discretionary disclosure and external financing. The Accounting Review 70 (1):135-150. Gebhardt, W. R., C. M. C. Lee, and B. Swaminathan. 2001. Toward an implied cost of capital Journal of Accounting Research 39 (1):135-176. Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7:85-107. Jhuang, S.-J. 2007. A study of the relationship between accrual quality and costs of capital. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Graduate Institute of Accounting. Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2):193-228. Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39:163-197. Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2):246-271. Lee, J.-Z., H.-C. Chen, and H.-J. Chang. 2005. The association between the information disclosure and transparency ranking system and stocks valuation. In 2005 Contemporary Accounting Theory and Practice Symposium. Ming Chuan University (In Chinese). Leuz, C., and C. Schrand. 2008. Voluntary disclosure and the cost of capital: Evidence from firm's responses to Enron shock. Working Paper, University of Chicago, University of Pennsylvania. Leuz, C., and R. E. Verrecchia. 2005. Firms' capital allocation choices, information quality, and the cost of capital. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania. McNichols, M. F. 2002. Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement):61-69. Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73 (4):459-474. Tasker, S. C. 1998. Bridging the information gap: Quarterly conference calls as a medium for voluntary disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies 3:137-167. Verrecchia, R. E. 1990. Information quality and discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12:365-380. Yu, T.-Y. 2005. Earnings quality and the cost of capital. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Graduate Institute of Accounting (In Chinese). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26062 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究欲探討揭露程度、盈餘品質與資金成本間之互動關係。過去研究顯示,揭露程度與資金成本間存在著負相關之關係,而盈餘品質與資金成本同時也存在著負相關之關係。本研究參照Francis et al. (2008)之研究概念,試圖探討揭露程度與資金成本間之關係在將盈餘品質納入考量後,是否能依然存在於台灣市場。
本研究利用證券暨期貨市場發展基金會所設置之「資訊揭露評鑑系統」之揭露評等為揭露程度之代理變數,並由修正Jones模型所衍生之三個裁決性盈餘模型為盈餘品質之代理變數。實證結果發現,評鑑之揭露等級越高,該等級之資金成本越低,顯示揭露程度與資金成本之負相關顯著存在於台灣市場中。但一旦盈餘品質納入考量後,該顯著負向關係並無如Francis et al. (2008)所發現,由顯著負相關之盈餘品質所取代。本研究結果顯示,尚有可能存在不同於盈餘品質之其他因素於台灣市場中,影響公司經理人對於揭露之意願,抑或是市場對於揭露程度之評價。另外,本研究對盈餘品質之代理變數做敏感性測試時,發現揭露等級最高之公司相較於其他評鑑等級較不受盈餘品質納入之影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the relation between disclosure level, earnings quality and cost of equity capital. Prior literatures have generally documented a negative relation between disclosure level and cost of equity capital, as well as a negative relation between earnings quality and cost of equity capital. Following the concept of Francis et al. (2008), this study attempts to investigate whether the negative association between disclosure level and cost of equity capital still holds when earnings quality is taken into consideration in the Taiwan context.
By using the disclosure ranking system by Security and Futures Institution of Taiwan as the disclosure level proxy, and earnings quality proxy derived basing on modified Jones model, this study finds disclosure level is significantly associated with cost of equity capital. The negative relation still holds after earnings quality is considered in the examination. Such findings are inconsistent with Francis et al. (2008), implying that there may be factors other than earnings quality that are considered in the pricing or incentive of firm disclosure under Taiwan context. Extending the examination with other measure of earnings quality, the finding is robust for the most transparent firms, but sensitive for firms in lower rankings of disclosure. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:59:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96722022-1.pdf: 470172 bytes, checksum: 4f83cbb77557f21147a50f1aa4795032 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents IV
List of Tables V 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development 4 2.1 Disclosure Level and Cost of Equity Capital 4 2.2 Earnings Quality and Cost of Equity Capital 10 2.3 Disclosure Level, Earnings Quality and Cost of Equity Capital 12 3. Measurement of Test Variables and Model Specification 15 3.1 Disclosure Level 15 3.2 Earnings Quality 19 3.2.1 Modified Jones Model 21 3.2.2 Performance Matched Modified Jones Model 27 3.3 Expected Cost of Equity Capital 28 3.4 Model Specification 31 3.4.1 Cost of Equity Capital and Disclosure Level 31 3.4.2 Cost of Equity Capital and Earnings Quality 37 3.4.3 Cost of Equity Capital, Disclosure Level and Earnings Quality 38 4. Sample Selection and Variable Descriptions 41 4.1 Sample Selection 41 4.2 Variable Description 43 5. Empirical Results and Analyses 58 5.1 Disclosure Level and Cost of Equity Capital 58 5.2 Earnings Quality and Cost of Equity Capital 66 5.3 Disclosure Level, Earnings Quality and Cost of Equity Capital 69 6. Sensitivity Analysis 78 6.1 Alternative sample of year 2006 and 2007 78 6.2 Alternative earnings quality proxy 81 7. Conclusion 88 References 91 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 揭露程度、盈餘品質與資金成本之關聯性研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Disclosure Level, Earnings Quality and Cost of Capital | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.advisor-orcid | ,劉嘉雯(acliu@ntu.edu.tw) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林瑞青 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 揭露程度,盈餘品質,資金成本,資訊風險,揭露評價, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Disclosure level,earnings quality,cost of equity capital,information risk,disclosure pricing, | en |
dc.relation.page | 96 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-06-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 459.15 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。